Detection Methods for Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds: a Unified Treatment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Detection Methods for Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds: a Unified Treatment Living Rev Relativ (2017) 20:2 DOI 10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1 REVIEW ARTICLE Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment Joseph D. Romano1 · Neil. J. Cornish2 Received: 23 August 2016 / Accepted: 17 January 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract We review detection methods that are currently in use or have been pro- posed to search for a stochastic background of gravitational radiation. We consider both Bayesian and frequentist searches using ground-based and space-based laser interferometers, spacecraft Doppler tracking, and pulsar timing arrays; and we allow for anisotropy, non-Gaussianity, and non-standard polarization states. Our focus is on relevant data analysis issues, and not on the particular astrophysical or early Universe sources that might give rise to such backgrounds. We provide a unified treatment of these searches at the level of detector response functions, detection sensitivity curves, and, more generally, at the level of the likelihood function, since the choice of sig- nal and noise models and prior probability distributions are actually what define the search. Pedagogical examples are given whenever possible to compare and contrast different approaches. We have tried to make the article as self-contained and compre- hensive as possible, targeting graduate students and new researchers looking to enter this field. Keywords Gravitational waves · Data analysis · Stochastic backgrounds Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. B Joseph D. Romano [email protected] Neil. J. Cornish [email protected] 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA 2 Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA 123 2 Page 2 of 223 Living Rev Relativ (2017) 20:2 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................... 1.1 Motivation and context ...................................... 1.1.1 Why do we care about detecting a stochastic background? ................ 1.1.2 Why is detection challenging? ............................... 1.1.3 What detection methods can one use? ........................... 1.1.4 What are the prospects for detection? ........................... 1.2 Searches across the gravitational-wave spectrum ......................... 1.2.1 Cosmic microwave background experiments ....................... 1.2.2 Pulsar timing arrays .................................... 1.2.3 Space-based interferometers ................................ 1.2.4 Other detectors ...................................... 1.3 Goal of this article ......................................... 1.4 Unification ............................................. 1.5 Outline ............................................... 2 Characterizing a stochastic gravitational-wave background ...................... 2.1 When is a gravitational-wave signal stochastic? ......................... 2.2 Plane-wave expansions ...................................... 2.2.1 Polarization basis ..................................... 2.2.2 Tensor spherical harmonic basis .............................. 2.2.3 Relating the two expansions ................................ 2.3 Statistical properties ........................................ 2.3.1 Quadratic expectation values for Gaussian-stationary backgrounds ........... 2.4 Fractional energy density spectrum ................................ 2.5 Characteristic strain ........................................ 3 Statistical inference ........................................... 3.1 Introduction to Bayesian and frequentist inference ........................ 3.2 Frequentist statistics ........................................ 3.2.1 Frequentist hypothesis testing ............................... 3.2.2 Frequentist detection probability ............................. 3.2.3 Frequentist upper limits .................................. 3.2.4 Frequentist parameter estimation ............................. 3.2.5 Unified approach for frequentist upper limits and confidence intervals .......... 3.3 Bayesian inference ........................................ 3.3.1 Bayesian parameter estimation .............................. 3.3.2 Bayesian upper limits ................................... 3.3.3 Bayesian model selection ................................. 3.4 Relating Bayesian and frequentist detection statements ..................... 3.5 Simple example comparing Bayesian and frequentist analyses .................. 3.5.1 Simulated data ....................................... 3.5.2 Frequentist analysis .................................... 3.5.3 Bayesian analysis ..................................... 3.5.4 Comparison summary ................................... 3.6 Likelihoods and priors for gravitational-wave searches ..................... 3.6.1 Calculating the likelihood ................................. 3.6.2 Choosing a prior ...................................... 4 Correlations ............................................... 4.1 Basic idea ............................................. 4.2 Relating correlations and likelihoods ............................... 4.3 Extension to multiple data samples ................................ 4.3.1 White noise and signal .................................. 4.3.2 Colored noise and signal ................................. 4.4 Maximum-likelihood detection statistic ............................. 4.5 Bayesian correlation analysis ................................... 4.6 Comparing frequentist and Bayesian cross-correlation methods ................. 4.6.1 Frequentist analysis .................................... 123 Living Rev Relativ (2017) 20:2 Page 3 of 223 2 4.6.2 Bayesian analysis ..................................... 4.7 What to do when cross-correlation methods aren’t available ................... 4.7.1 Single-detector excess power statistic ........................... 4.7.2 Null channel method ................................... 5 Geometrical factors ........................................... 5.1 Detector response ......................................... 5.1.1 Spacecraft Doppler tracking ................................ 5.1.2 Pulsar timing ........................................ 5.1.3 Laser interferometers ................................... 5.2 Calculation of response functions and antenna patterns ..................... 5.2.1 One-way tracking ..................................... 5.2.2 Two-way tracking ..................................... 5.2.3 Michelson interferometer ................................. 5.3 Overlap functions ......................................... 5.3.1 Definition ......................................... 5.3.2 Interpretation ....................................... 5.3.3 Normalization ....................................... 5.3.4 Auto-correlated response ................................. 5.4 Examples of overlap functions .................................. 5.4.1 LHO-LLO overlap function ................................ 5.4.2 Big-bang observer overlap function ............................ 5.4.3 Pulsar timing overlap function (Hellings and Downs curve) ............... 5.5 Moving detectors ......................................... 5.5.1 Monochromatic plane waves ............................... 5.5.2 Stochastic backgrounds .................................. 5.5.3 Rotational and orbital motion of Earth-based detectors .................. 6 Optimal filtering ............................................ 6.1 Optimal combination of independent measurements ....................... 6.2 Correlated measurements ..................................... 6.3 Matched filter ........................................... 6.4 Optimal filtering for a stochastic background ........................... 6.4.1 Optimal estimators for individual frequency bins ..................... 6.4.2 More general parameter estimation ............................ 7 Anisotropic backgrounds ........................................ 7.1 Preliminaries ........................................... 7.1.1 Quadratic expectation values ............................... 7.1.2 Short-term Fourier transforms ............................... 7.1.3 Cross-correlations ..................................... 7.1.4 Spherical harmonic components of γ(t; f, nˆ) ....................... 7.2 Modulations in the correlated output of two detectors ...................... 7.2.1 Time-dependent cross-correlation ............................. 7.2.2 Calculation of the optimal filter .............................. 7.2.3 Inverse problem ...................................... 7.3 Maximum-likelihood estimates of gravitational-wave power ................... 7.3.1 Likelihood function and maximum-likelihood estimators ................ 7.3.2 Extension to a network of detectors ............................ 7.3.3 Error estimates ....................................... 7.3.4 Point spread functions ................................... 7.3.5 Singular-value decomposition ............................... 7.3.6 Radiometer and spherical harmonic decomposition methods ............... 7.4 Frequentist detection statistics .................................. 7.5 Phase-coherent mapping ..................................... 7.5.1 Maximum-likelihood estimators and Fisher matrix .................... 7.5.2 Point spread functions ................................... 7.5.3 Singular value decomposition ..............................
Recommended publications
  • Phase Transitions and Gravitational Wave Tests of Pseudo-Goldstone Dark Matter in the Softly Broken Uð1þ Scalar Singlet Model
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 99, 115010 (2019) Phase transitions and gravitational wave tests of pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in the softly broken Uð1Þ scalar singlet model † Kristjan Kannike* and Martti Raidal National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Rävala 10, Tallinn 10143, Estonia (Received 26 February 2019; published 10 June 2019) We study phase transitions in a softly broken Uð1Þ complex singlet scalar model in which the dark matter is the pseudoscalar part of a singlet whose direct detection coupling to matter is strongly suppressed. Our aim is to find ways to test this model with the stochastic gravitational wave background from the scalar phase transition. We find that the phase transition which induces vacuum expectation values for both the Higgs boson and the singlet—necessary to provide a realistic dark matter candidate—is always of the second order. If the stochastic gravitational wave background characteristic to a first order phase transition will be discovered by interferometers, the soft breaking of Uð1Þ cannot be the explanation to the suppressed dark matter-baryon coupling, providing a conclusive negative test for this class of singlet models. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.115010 I. INTRODUCTION Is there any other way to test the softly broken Uð1Þ Scalar singlet is one of the most generic candidates for singlet DM model experimentally and to distinguish the the dark matter (DM) of the Universe [1,2], whose proper- particular model from more general versions of singlet scalar ties have been exhaustively studied [3–6] (see [7,8] for a DM? A new probe of physics beyond the Standard Model recent review and references).
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and the Quest in British Science Fiction Television CRITICAL EXPLORATIONS in SCIENCE FICTION and FANTASY (A Series Edited by Donald E
    Gender and the Quest in British Science Fiction Television CRITICAL EXPLORATIONS IN SCIENCE FICTION AND FANTASY (a series edited by Donald E. Palumbo and C.W. Sullivan III) 1 Worlds Apart? Dualism and Transgression in Contemporary Female Dystopias (Dunja M. Mohr, 2005) 2 Tolkien and Shakespeare: Essays on Shared Themes and Language (ed. Janet Brennan Croft, 2007) 3 Culture, Identities and Technology in the Star Wars Films: Essays on the Two Trilogies (ed. Carl Silvio, Tony M. Vinci, 2007) 4 The Influence of Star Trek on Television, Film and Culture (ed. Lincoln Geraghty, 2008) 5 Hugo Gernsback and the Century of Science Fiction (Gary Westfahl, 2007) 6 One Earth, One People: The Mythopoeic Fantasy Series of Ursula K. Le Guin, Lloyd Alexander, Madeleine L’Engle and Orson Scott Card (Marek Oziewicz, 2008) 7 The Evolution of Tolkien’s Mythology: A Study of the History of Middle-earth (Elizabeth A. Whittingham, 2008) 8 H. Beam Piper: A Biography (John F. Carr, 2008) 9 Dreams and Nightmares: Science and Technology in Myth and Fiction (Mordecai Roshwald, 2008) 10 Lilith in a New Light: Essays on the George MacDonald Fantasy Novel (ed. Lucas H. Harriman, 2008) 11 Feminist Narrative and the Supernatural: The Function of Fantastic Devices in Seven Recent Novels (Katherine J. Weese, 2008) 12 The Science of Fiction and the Fiction of Science: Collected Essays on SF Storytelling and the Gnostic Imagination (Frank McConnell, ed. Gary Westfahl, 2009) 13 Kim Stanley Robinson Maps the Unimaginable: Critical Essays (ed. William J. Burling, 2009) 14 The Inter-Galactic Playground: A Critical Study of Children’s and Teens’ Science Fiction (Farah Mendlesohn, 2009) 15 Science Fiction from Québec: A Postcolonial Study (Amy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.09714V1 [Gr-Qc] 19 Jul 2020 Tem PSR J0737-3039A/B
    Probing Noncommutative Gravity with Gravitational Wave and Binary Pulsar Observations Leah Jenks,1 Kent Yagi,2 and Stephon Alexander1 1Brown Theoretical Physics Center and Department of Physics, Brown University, 182 Hope Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02903 2Department of Physics, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400714, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4714, USA (Dated: July 21, 2020) Noncommutative gravity is a natural method of quantizing spacetime by promoting the spacetime coordinates themselves to operators which do not commute. This approach is motivated, for exam- ple, from a quantum gravity perspective, among others. Noncommutative gravity has been tested against the binary black hole merger event GW150914. Here, we extend and improve upon such a previous analysis by (i) relaxing an assumption made on the preferred direction due to noncommuta- tivity, (ii) using posterior samples produced by the LIGO/Virgo Collaborations, (iii) consider other gravitational wave events, namely GW151226, GW170608, GW170814 and GW170817, and (iv) consider binary pulsar observations. Using Kepler's law that contains the noncommutative effect at second post-Newtonian order, we derive corrections to the gravitational waveform phase and the pericenter precession. Using the gravitational wave and double pulsar binary observations, we find bounds on a space-time noncommutative tensor θ0i in terms of the preferred frame direction with respect to the orientation of each binary. We find that the gravitational wave bounds are stronger than the binary pulsar one by an order of magnitude and the noncommutative tensor normalized by the Planck length and time is constrained to be of order unity. I. INTRODUCTION of noncommutative gravity stems from these theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing Primordial Gravitational Waves Below the Binary-Black-Hole-Produced Stochastic Background
    Digging Deeper: Observing Primordial Gravitational Waves below the Binary-Black-Hole-Produced Stochastic Background The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Regimbau, T. et al. “Digging Deeper: Observing Primordial Gravitational Waves below the Binary-Black-Hole-Produced Stochastic Background.” Physical Review Letters 118.15 (2017): n. pag. © 2017 American Physical Society As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.151105 Publisher American Physical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108853 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. week ending PRL 118, 151105 (2017) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 14 APRIL 2017 Digging Deeper: Observing Primordial Gravitational Waves below the Binary-Black-Hole-Produced Stochastic Background † ‡ T. Regimbau,1,* M. Evans,2 N. Christensen,1,3, E. Katsavounidis,2 B. Sathyaprakash,4, and S. Vitale2 1Artemis, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Observatoire Côte d’Azur, CS 34229, Nice cedex 4, France 2LIGO, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 3Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota 55057, USA 4Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA and School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, United Kingdom (Received 25 November 2016; revised manuscript received 9 February 2017; published 14 April 2017) The merger rate of black hole binaries inferred from the detections in the first Advanced LIGO science run implies that a stochastic background produced by a cosmological population of mergers will likely mask the primordial gravitational wave background.
    [Show full text]
  • Observational Signatures from Tidal Disruption Events of White Dwarfs
    Doctoral Dissertation 博士論文 Observational signatures from tidal disruption events of white dwarfs (白色矮星の潮汐破壊現象からの観測兆候) A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2020 令和 2 年 12 月 博士(理学)申請 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo 東京大学大学院理学系研究科物理学専攻 Kojiro Kawana 川名 好史朗 i Abstract Recent advances in optical surveys have yielded a large sample of astronomical transients, including classically known novae and supernovae (SNe) and also newly discovered classes of transients. Among them, tidal disruption events (TDEs) have a unique feature that they can probe massive black holes (MBHs). A TDE is an event where a star approaching close to a BH is disrupted by tides of the BH. The disrupted star leaves debris bound to the BH emitting multi-wavelength and multi-messenger signals, which are observed as a transient. The observational signatures of TDEs bring us insights into physical processes around the BH, such as dynamics in the general relativistic gravity, accretion physics, and environmental information around BHs. Event rates of TDEs also inform us of populations of BHs. A large number of BHs have been detected, but still there are big mysteries. The most mysterious BHs are intermediate mass BHs (IMBHs) because they are a missing link: there is almost no certain evidence of IMBHs, while there are many detections of stellar mass BHs and supermassive BHs (SMBHs). Searches for IMBHs are not only important to reveal mysteries of IMBHs themselves, but also to understand origin(s) of SMBHs. Several scenarios to form SMBHs have been proposed, but it is still unclear which scenario(s) are real in the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • +14 Days of Tv Listings Free
    CINEMA VOD SPORTS TECH + 14 DAYS OF TV LISTINGS 1 JUNE 2015 ISSUE 2 TVGUIDE.CO.UK TVDAILY.COM Jurassic World Orange is the New Black Formula 1 Addictive Apps FREE 1 JUNE 2015 Issue 2 Contents TVGUIDE.CO.UK TVDAILY.COM EDITOR’S LETTER 4 Latest TV News 17 Food We are living in a The biggest news from the world of television. Your television dinners sorted with revolutionary age for inspiration from our favourite dramas. television. Not only is the way we watch television being challenged by the emergence of video on 18 Travel demand, but what we watch on television is Journey to the dizzying desert of Dorne or becoming increasingly take a trip to see the stunning setting of diverse and, thankfully, starting to catch up with Downton Abbey. real world demographics. With Orange Is The New Black back for another run on Netflix this month, we 19 Fashion decided to celebrate the 6 Top 100 WTF Steal some shadespiration from the arduous journey it’s taken to get to where we are in coolest sunglass-wearing dudes on TV. 2015 (p14). We still have a Moments (Part 2) long way to go, but we’re The final countdown of the most unbelievable getting there. Sports Susan Brett, Editor scenes ever to grace the small screen, 20 including the electrifying number one. All you need to know about the upcoming TVGuide.co.uk Formula 1 and MotoGP races. 104-08 Oxford Street, London, W1D 1LP [email protected] 8 Cinema CONTENT 22 Addictive Apps Editor: Susan Brett Everything you need to know about what’s Deputy Editor: Ally Russell A handy guide to all the best apps for Artistic Director: Francisco on at the Box Office right now.
    [Show full text]
  • Resampling Residuals on Phylogenetic Trees: Extended Results Peter J
    Resampling Residuals on Phylogenetic Trees: Extended Results Peter J. Waddell1, Ariful Azad2 and Ishita Khan2 [email protected] 1Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, U.S.A. 2Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, U.S.A . In this article the results of Waddell and Azad (2009) are extended. In particular, the geometric percentage mean standard deviation measure of the fit of distances to a phylogenetic tree are adjusted for the number of parameters fitted on the tree. The formulae are also presented in their general form for any weight that is a function of the distance. The cell line gene expression data set of Ross et al. (2000) is reanalyzed. It is shown that ordinary least squares (OLS) is a much better fit to the data than a Neighbor Joining or BME tree. Residual resampling shows that cancer cell lines do indeed fit a tree fairly well and that the tree does have strong internal structure. Simulations show that least squares tree building methods, including OLS, are strong competitors with BME type methods for fitting model data, while real world examples often suggest the same conclusion. “… his ignorance and almost doe-like naivety is keeping his mind receptive to a possible solution.” A quotation from Kryten: Red Dwarf VIII-Cassandra Keywords: Resampled Residual Bootstrap, flexi-Weighted Least Squares Phylogenetic Trees fWLS, Balanced Minimum Evolution BME, Phylogenomics, Gene Expression Tree Waddell, Azad and Khan (2010). Extended Results of Residual Resampling on Trees Page 1 1 Introduction This article updates and extends some of the results in Waddell and Azad (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds
    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds Nelson Christensen1;2 z 1ARTEMIS, Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire C^oted'Azur, CNRS, 06304 Nice, France 2Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA Abstract. A stochastic background of gravitational waves can be created by the superposition of a large number of independent sources. The physical processes occurring at the earliest moments of the universe certainly created a stochastic background that exists, at some level, today. This is analogous to the cosmic microwave background, which is an electromagnetic record of the early universe. The recent observations of gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors imply that there is also a stochastic background that has been created by binary black hole and binary neutron star mergers over the history of the universe. Whether the stochastic background is observed directly, or upper limits placed on it in specific frequency bands, important astrophysical and cosmological statements about it can be made. This review will summarize the current state of research of the stochastic background, from the sources of these gravitational waves, to the current methods used to observe them. Keywords: stochastic gravitational wave background, cosmology, gravitational waves 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are a prediction of Albert Einstein from 1916 [1,2], a consequence of general relativity [3]. Just as an accelerated electric charge will create electromagnetic waves (light), accelerating mass will create gravitational waves. And almost exactly arXiv:1811.08797v1 [gr-qc] 21 Nov 2018 a century after their prediction, gravitational waves were directly observed [4] for the first time by Advanced LIGO [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • Supernova Physics with Gravitational Waves: Newborn Black Holes Are “Kicked”
    Supernova physics with gravitational waves: Newborn black holes are “kicked” Richard O’Shaughnessy [email protected] 614 906 9649 Davide Gerosa [email protected] 626 395 6829 Daniel Wysocki [email protected] ! ! Accepted for publication in Physical Review Letters Poster 317.07 [see iPoster] June 5, AAS 2 3 GW151226: Gravitational waves from a black hole binary B. P.• ABBOTTGW151226et al. is the second, less massive binary black hole confidently detectedPHYS. by REV. LIGO X 6, 041015 (2016) GW151226 Abbott et al, PRX 6, 041015 (2016) ; PRL 118 221101 (2017) FIG. 4. Posterior probability densities of the masses, spins, and distance to the three events GW150914, LVT151012, and GW151226. source For the two-dimensional distributions, the contours show 50% and 90% credible regions. Top left panel: Component masses m1 and source source source m2 for the three events. We use the convention that m1 ≥ m2 , which produces the sharp cut in the two-dimensional source 0.3 distribution. For GW151226 and LVT151012, the contours follow lines of constant chirp mass (M 8.9−þ0.3 M and source 1.4 ¼ ⊙ M 15:1−þ1.1 M , respectively). In all three cases, both masses are consistent with being black holes. Top right panel: The mass and¼ dimensionless⊙ spin magnitude of the final black holes. Bottom left panel: The effective spin and mass ratios of the binary components. Bottom right panel: The luminosity distance to the three events. following section and are consistent with our expect- closely mirror the original analysis of GW150914, as ations for an astrophysical BBH source.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2104.05033V2 [Gr-Qc] 2 May 2021 Academy of Science, Beijing, China, 100190; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei- Jing 100049, China
    Mission Design for the TAIJI misson and Structure Formation in Early Universe Xuefei Gong, Shengnian Xu,Shanquan Gui, Shuanglin Huang and Yun-Kau Lau ∗ Abstract Gravitational wave detection in space promises to open a new window in astronomy to study the strong field dynamics of gravitational physics in astro- physics and cosmology. The present article is an extract of a report on a feasibility study of gravitational wave detection in space, commissioned by the National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences almost a decade ago. The objective of the study was to explore various possible mission options to detect gravitational waves in space alternative to that of the (e)LISA mission concept and look into the requirements on the technological fronts. On the basis of relative merits and bal- ance between science and technological feasibility, a set of representative mission options were studied and in the end a mission design was recommended as the start- ing point for research and development in the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The Xuefei Gong Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and System Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China, 100190. e-mail: [email protected] Shengnian Xu Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and System Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China, 100190. e-mail: [email protected] Shanquan Gui School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Depart- ment of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. e-mail: [email protected]. Shuanglin Huang Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and System Science, Chinese arXiv:2104.05033v2 [gr-qc] 2 May 2021 Academy of Science, Beijing, China, 100190; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei- jing 100049, China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Tragedy: Examining Nietzsche's Return to the Greeks
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2018-4 The eD ath of Tragedy: Examining Nietzsche’s Return to the Greeks Brian R. Long Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation Long, Brian R., "The eD ath of Tragedy: Examining Nietzsche’s Return to the Greeks" (2018). Honors Bachelor of Arts. 34. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab/34 This Capstone/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Bachelor of Arts by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Death of Tragedy: Examining Nietzsche’s Return to the Greeks Brian Long 1 Thesis Introduction In the study of philosophy, there are many dichotomies: Eastern philosophy versus Western philosophy, analytic versus continental, and so on. But none of these is as fundamental as the struggle between the ancients and the moderns. With the writings of Descartes, and perhaps even earlier with those of Machiavelli, there was a transition from “man in the world” to “man above the world.” Plato’s dialogues, Aristotle’s lecture notes, and the verses of the pre- Socratics are abandoned for having the wrong focus. No longer did philosophers seek to observe and question nature and man’s place in it; now the goal was mastery and possession of nature.
    [Show full text]