Burntwood-Action-Group-.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Inspection of Lichield District Council’s Local Plan Allocations Hearing Statement from Burntwood Action Group (BAG) BAG has 250 members and its 16 committee members represent most areas of Burntwood. By ‘liking’ our posts on facebook 388 people have shown their support for our statements regard the protection of the Green Belt and our input to driving forward improvements to Burntwood's infrastructure and amenities. BAG also represents the views, on Burntwood’s Green Belt, of 2500 residents of Burntwood who responded to the Consultation on the above document. Our submission in objection to the original draft was in great detail and this brief note aims to clarify our position. We supported the Focused Changes to the Plan as it abandoned plans for housing development in the Green Belt. In the late 1950s the land now referred to as Burntwood Town was chosen by Lichfield District Council to house “Birmingham overspill.” Infill between the villages of Chase Terrace, Chasetown, Boney Hay and Burntwood, coupled with outward sprawl has resulted in the, confusingly named, conurbation called Burntwood. To confuse matters further a town centre called Burntwood Town Centre was created at Sankey’s Corner in Chase Terrace, a mile from the shopping centre at Burntwood village.. That Town Centre has never provided the facilities required by this ever-expanding urban sprawl. Other than cheaper housing than Lichfield, the main attraction of Burntwood is its green surroundings. Burntwood has already been allowed to grow beyond the limit which can be supported by its infrastructure and the majority of its residents commute outwards for work, shopping, leisure activities and complex health needs. The table below illustrates how Burntwood is starved of facilities compared to Lichfield. Infrastructure/Facility Burntwood Lichfield Population (2011 Census) 26,049 (19% less than Lichfield) 32,219 A38 Trunk Rd NE-SE A51 NW-SE A5190 East-West Main Roads A525 N-S A5295 Western Bypass A5127 South A461 SW Railway Stations 0 2 Bus Stations 0 1 Banks/ Building Socs. 0 8 Universities 0 1 Secondary Schools 2 4 Hospitals 0 1 Health Centres 2 4 Leisure Centres 1 2 Theatres 0 1 Supermarkets 3 6 Department Stores 0 1 Cafes / Restaurants 14 21 The Inspector of the Local Plan Strategy recognised that: (para 236) “It is undoubtedly the case that there are a number of constraints at Burntwood - such as its limited range and level of services, the proximity of the Cannock Chase AONB, the possibility of coalescence with the West Midlands conurbation to the south and with villages such as Hammerwich to the south east – and these are not likely to change over time.” Developers are now trying to justify their plans for housing development in Burntwood’s Green Belt with the argument that an increased population is required to make improvements of Burntwood Town Centre viable. BAG maintains that, in its current state, Burntwood is not sustainable as a freestanding settlement due to its large population and inadequate facilities and infrastructure. The Local Plan Strategy is wrong in identifying Burntwood as a most sustainable settlement and BAG will be pursuing that argument through the review of the Plan. Vic Chamberlain Chairman Burntwood Action Group .