DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Global Automotive Tax Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 Global Automotive Tax Guide www.pwc.com 2015 Global Automotive Tax Guide November 2015 A guide covering everything you need to know about car taxation in 44 countries – from import and registration to finance, direct and indirect taxation Global Automotive Tax Guide Published by PwC November 2015 568 pages, numerous tables and figures The material contained in this guide reflects the position between December 2014 and April 2015 (respectively September 2015 for Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan, Malta, Mexico, Moldova, New Zealand, South Korea, South Africa, Thailand, Ukraine, USA). Whilst we have made every attempt to ensure the information contained in this guide is accurate, neither PwC nor the author can accept any responsibility for errors or omissions in the factual content. When specific problems occur in practice, it will often be necessary to refer to the laws, regulations and legal decisions of the country and to obtain appropriate professional advice. All rights reserved. Reproductions, microfilming, storage and processing in electronic media are not permitted without the publisher’s approval. PwC helps organisations and individuals create the value they’re looking for. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 184,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax and advisory services. Tell us what matters to you and find out more by visiting us at www.pwc.com. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC does not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. © 2015 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors Tax matters! We welcome you to the 2015 Global Automotive Tax Guide. This publication compiles tax aspects relating to the use of a car in 44 of the world’s most relevant car markets. It provides unique oversight over aspects like custom duties upon importation, car registration duties, car taxation – both from a direct and indirect tax perspective as well as company car taxation rules in those markets. The level of taxes and duties raised around the use of a car will eventually determine demand. Therefore, the information provided in this guide by the Global Automotive Tax network of PwC is indispensable for strategy departments of OEMs and suppliers, fleet operators, HR departments and tax departments of multi-national companies with activities in these markets. We hope that you find this guide useful and the information may serve as a tool in supporting your organizations’ tax strategy. Alexander Unfried Global Automotive Tax Leader T: + 49 711 25034 3216, [email protected] www.pwc.com/us Table of contents Argentina .................................................................................................................. 6 Austria .................................................................................................................... 21 Belgium ................................................................................................................... 29 Brazil ...................................................................................................................... 46 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................. 65 Canada ................................................................................................................... 75 People’s Republic of China (PRC) .......................................................................... 96 Czech Republic ...................................................................................................... 104 Denmark ................................................................................................................ 115 Estonia .................................................................................................................. 128 Finland.................................................................................................................. 136 France ................................................................................................................... 146 Germany ............................................................................................................... 159 Greece ................................................................................................................... 170 Hungary ............................................................................................................... 182 India ...................................................................................................................... 197 Ireland ................................................................................................................. 209 Italy ...................................................................................................................... 220 Japan ................................................................................................................... 230 Latvia .................................................................................................................... 244 Lithuania .............................................................................................................. 256 Luxembourg ......................................................................................................... 266 Malta .................................................................................................................... 278 Mexico .................................................................................................................. 309 Moldova ................................................................................................................ 328 Netherlands .......................................................................................................... 346 New Zealand ....................................................................................................... 360 Norway ................................................................................................................. 376 Poland ...................................................................................................................384 PwC Portugal ................................................................................................................ 397 Romania ............................................................................................................... 412 Russia ................................................................................................................... 422 Slovakia ................................................................................................................ 437 Slovenia ................................................................................................................ 451 South Africa .......................................................................................................... 466 South Korea .......................................................................................................... 473 Spain .....................................................................................................................483 Sweden .................................................................................................................. 495 Switzerland .......................................................................................................... 503 Thailand ............................................................................................................... 513 Turkey ................................................................................................................... 522 Ukraine ................................................................................................................. 533 United Kingdom ................................................................................................... 548 United States of America ..................................................................................... 558 PwC Argentina Ricardo Tavieres Automotive Tax Leader p: +54 11 4850 0000 Ext.6708 e: [email protected] Néstor Rossi p: +54 11 4850 0000 Ext.6713 e: [email protected] Ignacio Biagioni p: +54 341 446-8022 e: [email protected] Argentina 1. Importation of vehicles 1.1. Customs duties 1.1.1. New vehicles A “Mutual Agreement on Automotive Policy between the Republic of Argentina and the Federative Republic of Brazil” is in effect until June 30, 2016. This agreement establishes a 35% import duty for motor vehicles that do not originate from either of the parties (Argentina or Brazil), with exceptions regarding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County Tax Settlement Guide
    SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY FINAL TAX SETTLEMENT June 1, 2019 SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY FINAL TAX SETTLEMENT INDEX Tax Settlement Narrative Real Estate Page 1 – 4 Personal Page 5 – 6 Utility and Carrier Page 7 Net Tax and Distribution of Net Tax Page 7 – 11 Excess Collector’s Commission Page 12 Tax Settlement Checklist Page 13 Sample Tax Settlement Exhibits Page 14 – 22 Rate Calculation Examples Page 23 – 25 Cost Sheet Example Page 26 Monthly Distribution of Ad Valorem Taxes Page 27 Monthly Distribution of Sales Tax Rebate Page 28 Sales Tax Final Tax Settlement Page 29 – 30 General Information Pertaining to Ad Valorem Taxation Page 31 – 55 Certain Legislative Acts Pertaining to Taxes Page 56 – 66 GENERAL NARRATIVE The millage rates used for the extension of taxes will be those millage rates levied by the Quorum Court in its regular meeting in November of each year, in accordance with Ark. Code Ann. § 14- 14-904. The 2001 Legislature amended Ark. Code Ann. § 14-14-904, allowing the Quorum Court to correct millage levies in cases where an incorrect levy was due to clerical errors and/or the failure of the taxing entity to report the correct millage. The correction is effected by a county court order. In this manual, the millage rates have equalized for all taxing units and, therefore, are the same for both real estate and personal property. The breakdown of this sample tax settlement into real, personal, and utility taxes has a dual purpose: (1) to provide a mechanism to identify and isolate possible errors by type of tax and (2) to recognize those counties where the real and personal tax rates have not yet equalized.
    [Show full text]
  • ACEA Tax Guide 2018.Pdf
    2018 WWW.ACEA.BE Foreword The 2018 edition of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association’s annual Tax Guide provides an overview of specific taxes that are levied on motor vehicles in European countries, as well as in other key markets around the world. This comprehensive guide counts more than 300 pages, making it an indispensable tool for anyone interested in the European automotive industry and relevant policies. The 2018 Tax Guide contains all the latest information about taxes on vehicle acquisition (VAT, sales tax, registration tax), taxes on vehicle ownership (annual circulation tax, road tax) and taxes on motoring (fuel tax). Besides the 28 member states of the European Union, as well as the EFTA countries (Iceland, Norway and Switzerland), this Tax Guide also covers countries such as Brazil, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Turkey and the United States. The Tax Guide is compiled with the help of the national associations of motor vehicle manufacturers in all these countries. I would like to extend our sincere gratitude to all involved for making the latest information available for this publication. Erik Jonnaert ACEA Secretary General Copyright Reproduction of the content of this document is not permitted without the prior written consent of ACEA. Whenever reproduction is permitted, ACEA shall be referred to as source of the information. Summary EU member countries 5 EFTA 245 Other countries 254 EU member states EU summary tables 5 Austria 10 Belgium 19 Bulgaria 42 Croatia 48 Cyprus 52 Czech Republic 55 Denmark 65 Estonia 79 Finland 82 France 88 Germany 100 Greece 108 Hungary 119 Ireland 125 Italy 137 Latvia 148 Lithuania 154 Luxembourg 158 Malta 168 Netherlands 171 Poland 179 Portugal 184 Romania 194 Slovakia 198 Slovenia 211 Spain 215 Sweden 224 United Kingdom 234 01 EU summary tables Chapter prepared by Francesca Piazza [email protected] ACEA European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association Avenue des Nerviens 85 B — 1040 Brussels T.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation & Compliance Road Tax – Vehicle Excise Duty Fact Sheet – October 2018
    Regulation & Compliance Road Tax – Vehicle Excise Duty Fact Sheet – October 2018 Background The majority of vehicles driven on UK roads have to pay Vehicle Excise Duty (VED, also know as road fund licence). This page provides guidance to members on the current rates, how to pay and obtain refunds. How is VED calculated for cars? The vehicle excise duty is calculated based on the CO2 emissions of the car for the first year of registration and the list price of the car in years 2 to 7. If the list price of the car is over £40,000 a more expensive rate of VED is payable in years 2 to 7. The list price includes the price of the vehicle and any non-standard accessory which is attached to the vehicle when it is first registered. This includes: • Manufacturers Recommended Retail Price • The price of any non-standard option – fitted by the manufacturer • VAT • Electric cars – if the battery is leased then the cost of the battery constitutes parts of the list price • Delivery charges including pre delivery inspection charges It does not include: • Warranty / insurance and service packages etc • Any non-standard accessory – fitted by the dealer • Modifications such as ‘police packs’, ambulance / fire engine modifications • Modifications for disabled drivers The purpose of this fact sheet is to provide general guidance and information only. Although every effort is made to ensure that the content is accurate, the BVRLA cannot accept any liability whatsoever for any inaccuracy contained within it, nor for any damage or loss, direct or indirect, which may be suffered as a result of any reliance placed upon the information provided, whether arising in contract, tort or in any other way.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Volume Roads Subscriber Categories Chairman
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD No. 1426 Highway and Facility Design; Bridges, Other Structures, and Hydraulics and Hydrology Lo-w-Volutne Roads: Environtnental Planning and Assesstnent, Modern Titnber Bridges, and Other Issues A peer-reviewed publication of the Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATI ONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1993 Transportation Research Record 1426 Sponsorship of Transportation Research Record 1426 ISSN 0361-1981 ISBN 0-309-05573-3 GROUP 5-INTERGROUP RESOURCES AND ISSUES Price: $25. 00 Chairman: Patricia F. Waller, University of Michigan Committee on Low-Volume Roads Subscriber Categories Chairman:. Ronald W. Eck, West Virginia University IIA highway and facility design Abdullah Al-Mogbel, Gerald T. Coghlan, Santiago Corra UC bridges, other structures, and hydraulics and hydrology Caballero, Asif Faiz, Gerald E. Fisher, Richard B. Geiger, Jacob Greenstein, George M. Hammitt II, Henry Hide, Stuart W. TRB Publications Staff Hudson, Kay H. Hymas, Lynne H. Irwin, Thomas E. Mulinazzi, Director of Reports and Editorial Services: Nancy A. Ackerman Andrzej S. Nowak, Neville A. Parker, James B. Pickett, George B. Associate Editor/Supervisor: Luanne Crayton Pilkington II, James L. Pline, Jean Reichert, Richard Robinson, Associate Editors: Naomi Kassabian, Alison G. Tobias Bob L. Smith, Walter J. Tennant, Jr., Alex T. Visser, Michael C. Assistant Editors: Susan E. G. Brown, Norman Solomon Wagner Office Manager: Phyllis D. Barber Senior Production Assistant: Betty L. Hawkins G. P .. Jayaprakash, Transportation Research Board staff The organizational units, officers, and members are as of December 31, 1992. Printed in the United States of America Transportation Research Record 1426 Contents Foreword v Part 1-Environmental Planning and Assessment Environmental Impact Assessment and Evaluation of Low-Volume 3 Roads in Finland Anders H.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Australian Government's Taxation White Paper
    Submission to the Australian Government’s Taxation White Paper JUNE 2015 Contents Page Executive Summary 3 Transparent 3 Fair 4 Efficient 4 The Case for Reform 5 Introduction 5 Transparent 6 Motoring Taxation: What do Motorists Pay? 6 Fuel Taxation 7 Fuel Excise 7 Effects of the Reintroduction of Indexation 8 Interim Step – Revenue & Expenditure on Roads 9 Fuel Tax Credits 11 GST 11 Recommendations 12 Fair 12 Customs Duty 12 Luxury Car Tax 13 State and Territory Taxes 14 Registration 14 Stamp Duty 15 Recommendations 16 Efficient 16 The Current State of Funding for Roads 16 Infrastructure Reform 18 Previous Reviews 18 Medium to Long-Term Reform: Road User Charging 20 Principles for Australian Road Pricing Reforms 21 Which Road User Charging Models Might be Considered 21 Charges to Toll Providers Based on Performance 22 Recommendations 22 Executive Summary The AAA appreciates the opportunity to provide input into the Australian Government’s Tax White Paper process. The Government’s Infrastructure Audit clearly outlines the need for ongoing infrastructure investment that will allow new economic and social opportunities to be realised. Future funding constraints therefore present a core challenge to realising these opportunities and this Tax White Paper is an opportunity to outline the required program of reform. Existing institutional arrangements, especially in the transport sector, do not provide sufficient funding to address future infrastructure needs1. The combined expenditure of the public and private sectors on infrastructure will need to be expanded, all at a time when spending by governments is being constrained by other legitimate competing demands (notably health services and welfare).
    [Show full text]
  • Rrgp.222101-336.Pdf
    Revista Română de Geografie Politică Year XXII, no. 2, 2020, pp. 48-60 ISSN 1582-7763, E-ISSN 2065-1619 DOI 10.30892/rrgp.222101-336 THE TERRITORIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT USED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN THE ÉSZAK-ALFÖLD (NORTH GREAT PLAINS) REGION OF HUNGARY BETWEEN 2014 AND 2020 Zoltán BADAR County Directorates of Hajdú-Bihar, Hungarian State Treasury, Hatvan utca 15., 4026 Debrecen, Hungary, e-mail: [email protected] Gábor KOZMA University of Debrecen, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Earth Sciences, Department of Social Geography and Regional Development Planning, Egyetem tér 1., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Badar, Z., & Kozma, G. (2020). The Territorial Characteristics of European Union Subsidies for Economic Development Used by Local Authorities in the Eszak-Alföld (North Great Plains) Region of Hungary between 2014 and 2020. Revista Română de Geografie Politică, 22(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.30892/rrgp.222101-336 Abstract: In the EU budgetary period 2014-2020 the Hungarian Government devoted significant attention to economic development and its plan was to use 60% of EU regional policy subsidy for this purpose. In the light of this fact, the main aim of our publication is examine the spatial characteristics of the EU economic development aid awarded to local authorities situated in North Great Plain Region (Hajdú-Bihar county, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok county, Szabolcs- Szatmár-Bereg county), and to point out the differences between the individual areas and settlements. As a result of our research it can be concluded that firstly the smallest settlements were in an unfavourable position (fewer subsidy applications and smaller subsidy amounts), while in case of larger settlements, the examination does not show clear results.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1 Vehicle Costs This Chapter Examines Direct Financial Costs of Vehicle Use
    Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis – Vehicle Costs Victoria Transport Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org) 5.1 Vehicle Costs This chapter examines direct financial costs of vehicle use. These are divided into fixed costs, which are unaffected by mileage, and variable costs, which increase with mileage. This indicates the savings from transportation improvements that allow consumers to reduce their vehicle ownership and use. Definitions Vehicle Costs include various costs to own and use vehicles, and incremental equipment costs for telework. These indicate the savings that result when vehicle ownership and use are reduced. These costs are divided into fixed (also called ownership) and variable (also called operating, marginal or incremental) costs, as indicated below. Variable costs increase with vehicle mileage, fixed costs do not. Fixed Costs Variable Costs Vehicle purchase or lease Maintenance and repair Insurance Fuel, fuel taxes and oil Registration and vehicle taxes Paid parking and tolls Some costs that are considered fixed are actually partly variable. Depreciation is partly variable because increased mileage requires increased vehicle repairs and replacement, and reduces vehicle resale value. Used vehicle price guides (www.edmunds.com and www.kbb.com) indicate that mileage-related depreciation typically averages 5-15¢ per mile, about as much as vehicle operating costs. Most leased vehicles have additional charges averaging about 10¢ per mile for mileage over a certain annual mileage (typically 15,000 miles). Increased driving also increases the risk of additional user costs from crashes, traffic and parking citations. Mileage-Based Depreciation Example (by Art Ludwig, www.oasisdesign.net) It is significantly more expensive to drive your car, and you save much more when you reduce your vehicle mileage, than indicated by the American Automobile Association’s widely reproduced car cost estimates (www.aaa-calif.com/members/corpinfo/costbrch.asp).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Energy Efficient Vehicles on Gas Tax (Highway Trust Fund) and Alternative Funding for Infrastructure Construction, Upgrade, and Maintenance
    MICHIGAN OHIO UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER Alternate energy and system mobility to stimulate economic development. Report No: MIOH UTC TS51 2012-Final The Impact of Energy Efficient Vehicles on Gas Tax (Highway Trust Fund) and Alternative Funding for Infrastructure Construction, Upgrade, and Maintenance FINAL REPORT PROJECT TEAM Utpal Dutta Ph.D. P.E Nishita Patel Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering University of Detroit Mercy 4001 W. McNichols Road Detroit, MI 48221 Report No: MIOH UTC TS51 2012-Final Developed By: Utpal Dutta Principal Investigator, UDM Phone (313)993-1040 [email protected] Nishita Patel Graduate Student, UDM SPONSORS This is a Michigan Ohio University Transportation Center project funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the University of Detroit Mercy. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this report was supported through the Michigan Ohio University Transportation Center with funding provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and matching funding from the University of Detroit Mercy. In addition to the sponsors, the authors would like to express their appreciation to the Michigan Department of Transportation and the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) for their generous assistance in time and information. This support is gratefully acknowledged. DISCLAIMERS The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Michigan State Transportation Commission, the Michigan Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Used Motor Vehicle Imports and the Impact on Transportation in Zambia Working Paper No
    Used Motor Vehicle Imports and the Impact on Transportation in Zambia Working Paper No. 21 December 2014 “Working towards the formulation of sound economic policies”. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. OBJECTIVES 7 3. METHODOLOGY 8 3.1. Desk Review 8 3.2. Key informant Interviews 8 3.3. Data and Data Analysis 8 3.4. Definitions of Concepts 8 4. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 10 4.1. The average age of Zambia’s Motor Vehicle Fleet is increasing 10 A significant cause of this average age is that imported vehicles are getting 4.2. 13 older. 4.3. The fit Lifespan of second-hand Motor Vehicles in Zambia is low 15 4.4. The number of vehicles which are deemed unfit has increased significantly 15 4.5. Road Worthiness Inspections 17 4.6. Apparent disconnect between fitness status and crash rates 18 4.7. Policy Framework 18 CONTENTS 4.8. Policy Recommendation 21 4.8.1. The three short term policy options are: 22 4.8.2. Medium to Long Term Policy Options 24 5. CONCLUSION 26 REFERENCES 27 ANNEXURE 28 Transportation and Infrastructure Development i ii Transportation and Infrastructure Development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In May, 2014, then Transport, Works, Supply and Communications Minister Christopher Yaluma, announced that Government would not limit the age of motor vehicles imported into Zambia. This was in response to concerns voiced by some stakeholders in the transport sector regarding the condition of some of the second-hand motor vehicle imports. The Minister argued that limiting the age of imported motor vehicles would disadvantage the majority of Zambians who can hardly afford to buy motor vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paper Explores the Significance of the State Border in the Daily Life Of
    95/153 IGNACY JÓŹWIAK Mobility, work and citizenship in uncertain times. An ethnography of cross-border links at the boundaries of the European Union March 2017 www.migracje.uw.edu.pl1 Ignacy Jóźwiak Centre of Migration Research, University of Warsaw (Warsaw, Poland) [email protected] 2 Abstract This paper explores the role of the state border in the daily life of the borderlanders, the inhabitants of the Transcarpathia region in Western Ukraine. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the two border locations, it offers an insight into the region which has been affected by the 'EUropeanization' (due to its geographical location and historical legacies) of the border regime on the one hand and, as entire country, by the post 2014 crisis in Ukraine. The study points to the practices of the use of the border and cross-border links as well as the changes the patterns for doing so have undergone. In the face of political crisis and economic recession, Ukrainians face greater pressure to migrate while in the country's Western borderlands an increased utilization of already existing cross-border links can be observed. The subject-matter is set it in the framework of transnationalism and borderlands studies. Key words: state border, borderlands, migration, ethnography, transnationalism Abstrakt Artykuł omawia rolę, jaką granica państwa odgrywa w życiu codziennym mieszkańców pogranicza na przykładzie Zakarpacia w Zachodniej Ukrainie. Bazując na badaniach etnograficznych w dwóch przygranicznych lokalizacjach, przybliża region dotknięty z jednej strony (za sprawą geograficznego położenia oraz historycznego dziedzictwa) przez procesy 'Europeizacji' reżimu granicznego, a z drugiej (podobnie jak cały kraj) przez aktualny kryzys na Ukrainie.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Taxes and Charges in Europe an Overview Study of Economic Internalisation Measures Applied in Europe
    Transport taxes and charges in Europe An overview study of economic internalisation measures applied in Europe BY: Arno Schroten (CE Delft), Peter Scholten (CE Delft), Lisanne van Wijngaarden (CE Delft), Huib van Essen (CE Delft), Marco Brambilla (TRT), Marco Gatto (TRT), Silvia Maffii (TRT), Frank Trosky (Planco), Holger Kramer (ISL), Reinhard Monden (ISL), Damaris Bertschmann (INFRAS), Maura Killer (INFRAS), Anne Greinus (INFRAS), Vitalie Lambla (PMR), Kareen El Beyrouty (Ricardo), Sofia Amaral (Ricardo), Tom Nokes (Ricardo), Ancelin Coulon (Ricardo) March - 2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport Directorate A — Policy Coordination Unit A3 — Economic analysis and better regulation Contact: Rolf Diemer E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels 1 4.K83 - Transport taxes and charges in Europe - March 2019 EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you) LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 ISBN 978-92-79-99561-3 doi: 10.2832/416737
    [Show full text]
  • Affirmed by the Oregon Supreme Court
    854 September 21, 2017 No. 49 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON George WITTEMYER, Petitioner on Review, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent on Review. (CC 130304234; CA A154844; SC S064205) On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted March 6, 2017, at Lewis & Clark Law School, Portland. George Wittemyer, Pro Se, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs on behalf of himself as petitioner on review. Denis M. Vannier, Deputy City Attorney, City of Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief on behalf of respondent on review. John A. Bogdanski, Pro Se, Portland, argued the cause and filed the on behalf of himself as amicus curiae. Kristian Roggendorf, Lake Oswego, filed the brief on behalf of amicus curiae Eric Fruits, Ph.D. Sean O’Day, League of Oregon Cities, Salem, filed the brief for amicus curiae League of Oregon Cities. P.K. Runkles-Pearson, Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP, Portland, filed the brief on behalf of amicus curiae Portland Public School District. ______________ * On appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Kelly Skye, Judge. 278 Or App 746, 377 P3d 589 (2016). Cite as 361 Or 854 (2017) 855 Before Balmer, Chief Justice, and Kistler, Walters, Landau, Nakamoto, and Flynn, Justices.** LANDAU, J. The decision of the Court of Appeals and the limited judgment of the circuit court are affirmed. Case Summary: Plaintiff alleged that the City of Portland’s arts tax was a prohibited poll or head tax. The trial court determined that the tax was not a poll or head tax. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision and plaintiff petitioned for review.
    [Show full text]