DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuscola County, MI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuscola County, MI 43.943072N 43.916418N 83.859018W GOVERNMENTAL UNIT REFERENCE MAP (2015): Tuscola County, MI 82.835271W LEGEND Bloomfield SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE Caseville township township Federal American Indian Reservation L'ANSE RESERVATION (TA 1880) Lincoln township Off-Reservation Meade township Trust Land T1880 Chandler township MCD* American Indian Tribal Subdivision SHONTO (620) Alaska Native Regional McKinley township Corporation (ANRC) NANA ANRC 52120 State (or statistically ARENAC 011 equivalent entity) NEW YORK 36 BAY 017 County (or statistically ARENAC 011 equivalent entity) ERIE 029 HURON 063 Minor Civil Division Lk Huron Pigeon (MCD)1 Lee town 41460 MCD* Bay Port Census County Division 2 Jemez CCD 91650 1 (CCD) Fairhaven township Bad Consolidated City Elkton Axe MILFORD 47500 Colfax township Bad Axe Incorporated Place 3 Davis 18100 Oliver township Bad Axe Winsor township Census Designated Place (CDP) 2 Cochiti 16560 Sigel HURON 063 Verona township township DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL TUSCOLA 157 Interstate 3 Water Body Pleasant Lake U.S. Highway 2 Swamp or Marsh Okefenokee Swamp State Highway 4 Marsh Ln Bering Glacier Other Road Glacier MCD* Cul-de-sac Airport Oxnard Airport Circle College or University Coll/Univ Bingham township Geographic Offset or Corridor4 Sebewaing Sheridan township Military Fort Belvoir 4WD Trail, Stairway, Grant township Paris Alley, Walkway, or Ferry Owendale Ubly Prison or Juvenile P/JDC township Southern RR Detention Center MCD* 00000 Brookfield township Railroad Sebewaing township Pipeline or Cemetery Powell Cmtry Power Line Ridge or Fence Golf Course Pinehurst GlfCrs HURON 063 Property Line or National Park or Forest Yosemite NP SANILAC 151 Nonvisible Boundary Tumbling Cr Other Park Perennial Stream St Francis Park Bangor charter township Piney Cr Gagetown 31180 Minden Intermittent Stream Outside Subject Area township Unionville 81420 Mountain Peak or Hill Mt. Baker Inset Area A1 T 2 3 Elkland township 25300 4 Austin township U Where state, county, and/or MCD/CCD boundaries coincide, the map shows the S BAY 017 C boundary symbol for only the highest-ranking of these boundaries. Where American O Greenleaf Indian reservation and American Indian tribal subdivision boundaries coincide, the map L A township shows only the American Indian reservation boundaries. 1 Hampton charter township 5 7 Entity names are followed by either their FIPS code or census code; parentheses indicate Akron township 00720 Elmwood township 25720 a census code. Columbia township 17420 1 'MCD*' indicates a false MCD. These are for Census Bureau use only. 2 The CCD and CDP boundaries represent statistical entities only and are not updated through the BAS. 3 Incorporated place name color corresponds to the incorporated place fill color. Wheatland 4 Geographic offsets and corridors are displayed directly on the road. Geographic MCD* A1 township offsets and corridors represent the road right-of-way for both or one side of a road Bay and typically extend thirty feet from the road. City Wisner township 88080 Essexville MCD* Due to space limitations, some road names, along with other feature and geography names on the map, may not be shown. The Census Bureau stores primary and alternate road names, but only primary road names are used to label the roads on these maps. Akron 00700 Argyle Evergreen township township Almer township 01620 Bay City Portsmouth charter township Ellington township 25380 Novesta township 59420 Fairgrove township 27100 Gilford township 32160 Merritt township Fairgrove 27080 TUSCOLA 157 SANILAC 151 C1 C2 Snover Moore township Robin Glen-Indiantown BAY 017 Caro 13420 Custer township Zilwaukee township 5 MCD* 13420 6 7 SAGINAW 145 Reese Reese Kingston township 43400 Lamotte township Wells township 85280 B1 Reese Watertown BAS SIGNATURE BOX Buena Vista Reese township charter township Juniata township 42140 Indianfields The corrected boundaries shown on the map township 40440 are accurate as of January 1, 2016. Blumfield township Denmark township 21600 Print Name Buena Vista Kingston 43380 Position Signature Buena Vista Telephone Date TUSCOLA 157 SAGINAW 145 Miller Fld Koylton township 43880 Dayton township 19980 For Census Use Only Fremont township 30760 Elmer NPC COUNTY D1 township PROCESSING SHEET CHANGES Bridgeport Marlette township State Code: County Code: Elk township Changes: (circle) N B C F A J PL AL Other Entity Affected Type of Change (circle) Bridgeport Frankenmuth township Tuscola township 80940 Vassar township 81860 charter township Tanke Fld Marlette MCD* E1 MCD* B F A L J TUSCOLA 157 Clifford B F A L J MCD* LAPEER 087 Frankenmuth Frankenmuth Flynn township SANILAC 151 Rich LAPEER 087 8 9 township Burlington township 10 75 75 Watertown township 84460 Millington 54220 Millington township 54240 Arbela township 03220 Birch Run township Taymouth township Fostoria 29920 Birch Run TUSCOLA 157 Brown City North Speaker township 87 Branch MCD* LAPEER 0 Burnside Otter township Lake TUSCOLA 157 MCD* Maple Valley township North Branch township Total Sheets: 17 (Index 1; Parent 10; Inset 6) GENESEE 049 Deerfield township Burt SAGINAW 145 GENESEE 049 LAPEER 087 Marathon township GENESEE 049 Thetford township Forest township MCD* Montrose charter township Vienna charter township NAME: Tuscola County (157) Barnes Lake-Millers Lake ENTITY TYPE: County or statistically equivalent entity ST: Michigan (26) 43.203715N 43.177381N 83.889103W 82.878103W Projection: Albers Equal Area Conic All legal boundaries and names are as reported through the 2015 Boundary and Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS) ID: 22615700000 INDEX OR PARENT SHEET #: 000 Annexation Survey (BAS). The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau Datum: NAD 83 INSET SHEET #: 000000 statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation Spheroid: GRS 80 0 3 6 9 12 15 Kilometers BAS Submission Deadline: March 1, 2016 for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority 1st Standard Parallel: 42 47 51 or rights of ownership or entitlement. 2nd Standard Parallel: 47 12 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 Miles PDF versions of the BAS maps are now available at: 2015 COUNTY REF MAP (INDEX) Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau's MAF/TIGER database (BAS16), September 2015 Central Meridian: -86 16 13 The plotted map scale is 1:112585 www.census.gov/geo/partnerships/bas.html Created by Geography Division: November 25, 2015 Latitude of Projection's Origin: 41 41 45 False Easting: 0 For more information, or to request additional maps, please email [email protected], U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau False Northing: 0 call 1-800-972-5651, or visit www.census.gov/geo/partnerships/bas.html. 455022615700000000000000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ACT Act 359 of 1947 an ACT to Authorize the Incorporation of Charter Townships; to Provide a Municipal Char
    THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ACT Act 359 of 1947 AN ACT to authorize the incorporation of charter townships; to provide a municipal charter therefor; to prescribe the powers and functions thereof; and to prescribe penalties and provide remedies. History: 1947, Act 359, Eff. Oct. 11, 1947;Am. 1998, Act 144, Eff. Mar. 23, 1999. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 42.1 Short title; charter townships; incorporation; powers, privileges, immunities and liabilities; petition; special census; expenses. Sec. 1. (1) This act shall be known and may be cited as “the charter township act”. (2) A township, having a population of 2,000 or more inhabitants according to the most recent regular or special federal or state census of the inhabitants of the township may incorporate as a charter township. The charter township shall be a municipal corporation, to be known and designated as the charter township of ............................, and shall be subject to this act, which is the charter of the charter township. The charter township, its inhabitants, and its officers shall have, except as otherwise provided in this act, all the powers, privileges, immunities, and liabilities possessed by a township, its inhabitants, and its officers by law and under chapter 16 of the Revised Statutes of 1846, being sections 41.1a to 41.110c of the Michigan Compiled Laws. (3) A special census of the inhabitants of a township desiring to incorporate under this act shall be taken by the secretary of state upon receipt of a petition signed by not less than 100 registered electors of the township.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribal Lands In
    A REPORT ON INDIAN TOWNSHIP PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBAL LANDS IN THE VICINITY OF PRINCETON, MAINE Anthony J. Kaliss 1971 Introduction to 1971 Printing Over two years have passed since I completed the research work for this report and during those years first one thing and ttan another prevented its final completion and printing. The main credit for the final preparation and printing goes to the Division of Indian Services of the Catholic Diocese of Portland and the American Civil Liberities Union of Maine. The Dioscese provided general assistance from its office staff headed by Louis Doyle and particular thanks is due to Erline Paul of Indian Island who did a really excellent job of typing more than 50 stencils of title abstracts, by their nature a real nuisance to type. The American Civil Liberities Union contrib­ uted greatly by undertaking to print the report Xtfhich will come to some 130 pages. Finally another excellent typist must be thanked and that is Edward Hinckley former Commissioner of Indian Affairs who also did up some 50 stencils It is my feeling that this report is more timely than ever. The Indian land problems have still not been resolved, but more and more concern is being expressed by Indians and non-Indians that something be done. Hopefully the appearance of this report at this time will help lead to some definite action whether in or out of the courts. Further research on Indian lands and trust funds remains to be done. The material, I believe, is available and it is my hope that this report will stimulate someone to undertake the necessary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Boundaries and Annexation
    Section 1: Local Government Chapter 4: Boundaries and Annexation Introduction petition is filed, or if a referendum is held The first and only principle of law and the incorporation passes, the SBC then governing boundaries of municipalities is orders an election to be held to elect a that no one—no governmental authority, or charter commission. Upon election, the individual, person or entity—has any legally charter commission drafts a charter and protected right to the placement of a sends it to the governor’s office for municipal boundary in a particular location. approval. If so approved, an election is then Municipal boundaries are drawn by held (1) to approve the charter, and (2) to politicians in the legislature. They can be elect the first slate of municipal officials. If redrawn at any time by those same the charter does not secure approval of the politicians or by a vote of the people. electorate, the charter commission has three Political boundaries are created by years within which to submit a new incorporation. They are changed by proposed charter to the governor’s office. disincorporation, consolidation, annexation, (See Chapter 3, Charter Revision and or detachment. Amendment for more on charter commissions) Incorporation Disincorporation Villages and cities have separate statutes addressing incorporation. Both statutes have Disincorporation in a home rule city begins one thing in common. The process begins by with the filing of a petition of at least 25 securing a petition for incorporation from percent of the city electors. A city sends the the State Boundary Commission (SBC). The petition to the county commission, which is SBC has an informational guideline on how required to review it.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Water Management Plan
    STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN GENERAL COMPLIANCE STANDARDS AND NPDES PHASE II REQUIREMENTS FOR STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN FOR DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP RELEVANT TO NPDES COC MIG610166 SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP SAGINAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN Prepared By: Revised November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 II. ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................... 4 A. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................. 4 B. REVIEW PROCEDURE .................................................................................... 10 1. PRE-DESIGN MEETING ............................................................................ 10 2. FORMAL REVIEW .................................................................................... 11 C. PLAN APPROVAL/ISSUANCE OF STORM WATER PERMIT .................................... 13 D. CHANGES TO PLAN AFTER APPROVAL.......................................................... 13 E. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................ 14 F. FEE SCHEDULE ............................................................................................. 16 H. EXEMPTIONS ...................................................................................................... 16 I. APPEALS PROCESS ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introductionntroduction
    CCHAPTERHAPTER 1:1: IINTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTION In This Chapter: Historical Setting - History & Memories Location in the County & Region - Location & Description, Municipal Boundaries Regional Influences on the Township - Accessibility, Urban Development, Transportation, Recreation and Cultural Facilities PORT HURON TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION The information presented here is a combination of input from citizens and elected and appointed officials, as well as Township Planning Commission members and staff, along with the assistance and guidance of the St. Clair County Planning Commission. It contains statistical data and information, both past and present, that can give some insight for our future. While we cannot definitively project future development, we can try to help determine efficient and effective ways of managing and shaping the way our Township develops. In concert with that thought, this plan also includes a chapter on a Vision for the Township which includes both goals and objectives. This can help us focus on what we would like development to look like when it comes, and to give direction to developers on the expectations we have as a community. Knowing that these goals and objectives have been developed by our citizens gives them guidance as to what is desirable and marketable to our residents and therefore profitable to them. While many master plans contain an overwhelming amount of statistical information, we hope to provide a fair amount of usable information in the form of maps, charts and tables that demonstrate logical and historical reasons and trends for what has taken place in the Township and how we can benefit from that in our future.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Packet
    CANTON C ommunit y CANTON ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1150 S. CANTON CENTER ROAD CANTON, MI 48188 REGULAR BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 10, 2019 6:00 P.M.: CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: ANTHONY, FOSTER, GRAHAM-HUDAK, SIEGRIST, SLAVENS, SNEIDEMAN & WILLIAMS CLOSED SESSION: UPDATE ON PENDING LITIGATION (MEIER VS. CANTON TOWNSHIP) ADOPTION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES: NOVEMBER 19 & 26, DECEMBER 3, 2019 PROMOTION RECOGNITION: 1) SERGEANT COLTHURST 2) LIEUTENANT ANDES 3) LIEUTENANT JOHNSON CITIZEN’S NON-AGENDA ITEM COMMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENT PAYMENT OF BILLS CONSENT CALENDAR: 1) CONSIDER RE-APPOINTMENT OF RON PENNINGTON TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS (MSD) 2) CONSIDER SECOND READING OF AN AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX A – ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE GREATLAND REAL ESTATE REZONING (MSD) GENERAL CALENDAR: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR NOTICE OF INTENT RESOLUTION TO ISSUE LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (1) (FBD) 2) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CANTON TOWNSHIP AND THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES WITH A TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023 (1) (HR) 3) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CANTON TOWNSHIP AND THE TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL AND OFFICE WORKERS ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN WITH A TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022 (1) (HR) 4) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF WAGE INCREASE AND OTHER MERIT COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MERIT (FULL-TIME, NON-UNION) EMPLOYEES FOR THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR (1) (HR) 5) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF WAGE INCREASE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS (1) (SUPERVISOR) 6) CONSIDER AWARD OF THE FINAL ADJUSTING CHANGE ORDER TO FISHBECK, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE 2019 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (1) (MSD) 7) CONSIDER AWARD OF A CHANGE ORDER TO THE CONTRACT WITH GREAT LAKES CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Troy City, MI 83.059894W
    42.642944N 83.193339W GOVERNMENTAL UNIT REFERENCE MAP (2015): Troy city, MI Toucan St Enterprise Dr Dr Commerce Research Dr Research A us Ln Meadow Long C tin F o h x i A c v e k d Bagley Ave W a R H o d Ave Dearborn i o Simpson Dr Simpson e c e l Hartline Dr H d k am e a Norton Lawn St Lawn Norton pt s o o n t d Dr Walbridge Cir S S Northfield Dr r n L y t n k Harrington Rd Harrington L n r i a l e Upp Dr Ridge Gravel w r Devo i S Woodelm Dr bo Dr Corinthia r n D C Dawes t o Walsh Dr Walsh e R g St Weaverton y o Rid Dartmouth Dr Frankson Ave B d a Bond St n l e Ave c Audubon Blvd t t r b S S a u k ry Dr Auburn Rd 42.639122N B r y la Vineyard Ave ky e 83.059894W S v r R a i L r H d o we g e Dr Quail E Auburn Rd E a W Auburn Rd s Auburn Rd t Midvale Dr Rd Livernois S e LEGEND r W n Sp A rin o SYMBOL DESCRIPTION o v g Huling St Huling Grant Rd Grant e h d A a i SYMBOL l Jonathon Cir E l Meadowview Dr l L Dr Courtfield v l e o D R LABEL STYLE Waco St Waco x n r d June Ave h Hickory L M Marlowe a aw G Hessel Ave M a m m n n r Collingwood Dr Cir Jonathan r R n Federal American Indian Gerald Ave elvin Ave Longview Ave Ave e Emmons Ave d D o Harrison Ave L k e r r n n S N n Devondale Rd h o a R Reservation Donley Ave Donley MCD* 69035 o a s s S Rochester Rd Rochester S d d r b P y i t D o w L'ANSE RESERVATION (TA 1880) o G d n i Tamm Ave Fantail Dr o t an d R Buttercup c r L d G h a Primrose Dr Schimmel Ave w Rockhaven Ave Sibley Off-Reservation n r r i Ave Culbertson Bathurst Ave S Trust Land D C t Ave m t a r Christie Ln e Gilsam Ave h l T1880
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States
    132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane 45°N Harlem Belcourt WAS HIN Box Wagner E GTO Plummer Elder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato IO Poplar K R Toppenish A 43°N New L Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N Warm N Springs LA KE No H r Fort U t Yates Boston hw Billings R TS e Crow ET 41°N s Agency O S t HU Worcester O R N AC RE eg Lame Deer OTA NTARIO SS GON io MINNES E O MA 42°N n Sisseton K A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T SIN I C WISCON Eagle H 40°N IDA Butte Buffalo Boise HO C I 6 41°N R M o E cky M SOUTH DAKOTA ou K AN ntai ICHIG n R A M egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee R Fort Hall R west 24 E d Detroit Mi E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine Ridge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ A 39°N IOW Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD E NEBRASKA OHIO D
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Michigan Submission for Mandatory Fee-To-Trust Acquisition Pursuant to The
    THE SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MICHIGAN SUBMISSION FOR MANDATORY FEE-TO-TRUST ACQUISITION PURSUANT TO THE MICHIGAN INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT THE “SIBLEY PARCEL” (+/- 71 acres in Huron Charter Township, Wayne County, Michigan) Submission and Supporting Exhibits June 10, 2014 Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Submission for Mandatory Fee-to Trust Acquisition The “Sibley Parcel,” Huron Charter Township, Michigan TABLE OF CONTENTS Submission for Mandatory Fee-to-Trust Acquisition I. SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 II. APPLICABLE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 1 A. Tribal History, Recognition, And Name ................................................................... 2 B. Acquisition Of The Parcel .......................................................................................... 3 C. Statutory Authority .................................................................................................... 3 1. MILCSA Imposes A Mandatory Trust Obligation When Its Requirements Are Satisfied ................................................................. 3 2. MILCSA’s Requirements Are Satisfied Here .................................................... 5 III. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 8 Supporting Exhibits 1. Purchase Agreement 2. Title Commitment and
    [Show full text]
  • Community Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Greenway Plan
    2019-2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION 3 Location 3 Climate 3 Natural Resources 4 Land 4 Water and Wetlands 5 Trails and Greenways 7 Vegetation and Wildlife 8 Potential Conservation Areas 8 Social Characteristics 11 Regional Population 17 Economics/Business and Industry 18 School Facilities 19 Investing In Parks, Recreation and Open Space 20 Tourism 21 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE 22 Plan Jurisdiction 22 Parks Operations and Management 22 Organizational Chart 23 Budget 24 RECREATION INVENTORY 24 Map of Parks and Recreation Areas owned or operated by Niles Charter Township 25 Parks Inventory, Evaluation, and Barrier-Free Assessment 26 Other Township and Nearby Recreational Opportunities 31 Cultural/Historic Buildings and Property 32 Regional Parks 33 City of Niles Parks 33 Water Activity - Public Access Sites 34 Area Campgrounds 34 Area Golf Courses 34 Other Opportunities 34 Northern Indiana Parks Affiliated with Indiana-Michigan River Valley Trail 34 Status Report of Previous DNR Grant-Assisted Projects 35 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING AND PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS 36 2018 Public Input and 2018 Survey Results 37 MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 49 Mission Statement 49 Overall Planning Goals 49 ACTION PLAN 50 General Park Projects 50 Other Potential Projects 51 Individual Park Projects 52 PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENTATION 61 Public Input Session 61 Public Notice of Review and Comment Period 63 Public Notice of Public Hearing of the Proposed Plan 64 Resolution of the Township Board 65 Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes – Public Hearing 66 Letter to County Planning Commission 68 Letter to Regional Planning Agency 69 Letter to Department of Natural Resources 70 Recreation Plan Certification Checklist 71 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As a community, Niles Charter Township has demonstrated complete understanding of the value, and broad scope, of benefits that comprehensive recreational planning can bring to residents and visitors.
    [Show full text]