DOCSLIB.ORG

A Value Chain Analysis of Fresh Vegetables in Kenya and Tanzania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Value Chain Analysis of Fresh Vegetables in Kenya and Tanzania SLE Publication Series Market-driven development and poverty reduction: A value chain analysis of fresh vegetables in Kenya and Tanzania Commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH – Beratungsgruppe Entwicklungsorientierte Agrarforschung (BEAF) African Insect Science for Food and Health (icipe) and The World Vegetable Center – Regional Center for Africa (AVRDC-RCA) Associated Partners GTZ – PSDA Nairobi Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya Project Team: Thomas Koenig (Team Leader), Jantje Blatt, Kristian Brakel, Kristina Kloss, Thorsten Nilges, Franziska Woellert Nairobi, Berlin, January 2008 Disclaimer: The findings, interpretations, and conclusions in this report are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) or the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ). Schriftenreihe des SLE (Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung) SLE Publication Series (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) Herausgeber / SLE Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Editor (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Sitz: Hessische Straße 1-2 10115 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/sle www.berlinerseminar.de Redaktion / Gabriele Beckmann Managing Editor SLE Layout Dorian Frieden SLE Druck / Zerbe Druck & Werbung Printing Planckstr. 11 15537 Grünheide OT Hangelsberg Vertrieb / SLE Distributors Hessische Straße 1-2 10115 Berlin 1. Auflage 2008 / 1-200 1st edition 2008 Copyright 2008 by SLE ISSN 1433-4585 ISBN 3-936602-32-8 Titelbild / Central Market in Arusha, Tanzania, and onion bags in Tanzania for the Cover photo cross-border trade, Kristian Brakel Foreword v Foreword The Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development (Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung), at the Humboldt University Berlin, has trained young professionals in the field of German and international development cooperation for more than forty years. Three month consulting projects conducted on behalf of German and international cooperation organisations form part of the one-year postgraduate course. In multidisciplinary teams young professionals carry out research on innovative future- oriented topics, and act as consultants. Involving various local actors in the process is of paramount importance here. The findings of this “applied research” provide an immediate contribution to solving development problems in rural areas. Over the years, SLE has managed more than a hundred consulting projects in more than sixty countries, and regularly publishes the results in this series. th In 2007 four groups from the 45 course of the SLE simultaneously executed projects in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Tanzania, Mozambique and Philippines which focussed on the planning and poverty-orientation of development programmes. The present study was sponsored by the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Development and Cooperation (BMZ). Prof. Otto Kaufmann Carola Jacobi-Sambou Dean Director Agricultural Horticultural Faculty SLE – Centre for Advanced Humboldt University Berlin Training in Rural Development vi Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Preliminary Note On 27 December 2007 the presidential election was held in Kenya. Immediately following the election large-scale riots took place to protest against the delay in the vote count and against the election result itself. Since then there have been violent clashes along political and ethnic lines in the course of which almost 800 people have lost their lives. The study team is appalled by these events. We were in Nairobi and the neighbouring regions in Kenya during the election campaign and we spent a very peaceful time there. During the months spent in Kenya the SLE group had no inkling that the situation would escalate to such an extent. On a day to day basis we did not experience Kenyan tribal allegiances as a universally determining factor. Our partners and the people we interviewed for the study cooperated beyond ethnic lines. Our thoughts go out to these people who were so helpful and open to us during our stay. The thought that the lives of some of our partners are endangered by the riots and that others might be the victims of violence is very distressing for us. We truly hope that peace will soon return to Kenya and – with the support of the donor community – that reforms take place that will really help the poorest Kenyans. First of all, the study team would like to thank GTZ-BEAF, represented by Michael Bosch, for the commission to carry out the present study. Dr. Dagmar Mithöfer, icipe, and Stefan Pletziger, AVRDC; acted as the representatives of our partner institutions in Kenya and Tanzania. We are very thankful for their support with logistics and organisation as well as their brilliant expertise. Hassan Mndiga, AVRDC, was a very important key resource person who provided a great deal of important input for the study. In Kenya we cooperated closely with GTZ-PSDA, represented by Eberhard Krain, Margaret Orina and Heike Höffler. Monica Mueni and Virginia Mwai, both Ministry of Agriculture in Kenya, were very supportive during the data collection in Kenya. All of them helped the team to establish contacts to interview partners and provided detailed information on the Kenyan situation. Our cooperation with the translators was fruitful and effective in carrying out the interviews at all levels as we intended. We would like to thank Gladys Machange, David Solomon, Mayson Ruangisa, Peter Karanka and Francis Imani in Tanzania and Teresiah Mbugua and Gibson Githaiga in Kenya for their excellent cooperation. During our data collection the team split up into subgroups at different production sites and markets to carry out interviews. We appreciated the collaboration with our Acknowledgements vii counterparts in assisting us in contacting all the interview partners and receiving detailed information about the local situation. In Tanzania we cooperated with Simon Loto, Arumeru District, Mr. Maganga, Karatu District, and Fatuma Mdibalema, Arusha Municiplatiy Council. In Kenya Peter Ndungu, Farm Concern International, and Peter Makokha, MoA, both in Kieni West, Obadiah Mwangi in Mwea as well as Duncan Murithi, Farm Concern International and Monica Mueni, MoA, assisted us in Nairobi. For the issue of cross-border trade we would like to thank Josphat Mugambi, Kenyan trader, in particular for his open minded cooperation. We talked to more than one hundred interview partners in both countries. This study would not have been possible without their willingness to spend so much time with us. The SLE team, namely Iris Paulus and Gabi Beckmann provided valuable comments on our work at different stages. Nicholena Gann proofread the study to check the English language and Dorian Frieden finalised the layout. We would like to express our thanks to everybody mentioned here for their particular support and contribution to this study. The SLE-Team viii Executive Summary Executive Summary In recent years horticulture’s relevance has increased in East Africa. Mainly export oriented middle and large scale enterprises have benefited from this development. At the same time, domestic demand for horticultural products has increased due to a rapidly growing urban population and relatively high income elasticity linked to demand for vegetables. Agriculture in general plays an important role in both countries’ economies as the share of the Kenyan and Tanzanian GDP indicates (24% in Kenya und 45% in Tanzania). Strengthening the labour intensive horticulture sub-sector could contribute to poverty reduction, because the majority of the poor population lives and works in rural areas. This is one of the core hypotheses of the present study. Horticulture in this context includes the entire value chain from production up to consumption of vegetables. Tomatoes and onions were chosen as the focus products of the study, because both commodities play an important role in the domestic vegetables market and, furthermore, the two research institutes icipe and AVRDC, with whom the study team cooperated, are particularly interested in these crops. The following three major research areas were identified: • Investigation into the potential for poverty reduction within a market-driven development of the respective value chains, • Analyses of the cross-border onion trade between Tanzania und Kenya, • Value chain comparison of the two countries. First of all, in order to carry out the survey the poor actors of the value chains were identified, secondly their relation and power distribution among the actors was analysed and thirdly the legal regulations in force, the issue of standards in particular, were considered. The analyses of fresh vegetables’ value chains include the input supply, production, various stages of trading and marketing and finally consumption. Transport has been considered as a cross-sectional issue, because different actors provide this service at different stages within the chains. The regional cross-border trade of onions between Tanzania and Kenya is subsumed under domestic trade in statistical terms. In addition to this functional perspective of value chains, there is an institutional perspective focusing on the actors’ contribution to the chains. The study team combined this institutional perspective with the livelihood approach in order to determine the actors’ living conditions and their vulnerability within the value
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Tanzania in Figures
    2019 Tanzania in Figures The United Republic of Tanzania 2019 TANZANIA IN FIGURES National Bureau of Statistics Dodoma June 2020 H. E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli President of the United Republic of Tanzania “Statistics are very vital in the development of any country particularly when they are of good quality since they enable government to understand the needs of its people, set goals and formulate development programmes and monitor their implementation” H.E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli the President of the United Republic of Tanzania at the foundation stone-laying ceremony for the new NBS offices in Dodoma December, 2017. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical information is very important as it helps a person to do things in an organizational way with greater precision unlike when one does not have. In my business, for example, statistics help me know where I can get raw materials, get to know the number of my customers and help me prepare products accordingly. Indeed, the numbers show the trend of my business which allows me to predict the future. My customers are both locals and foreigners who yearly visit the region. In June every year, I gather information from various institutions which receive foreign visitors here in Dodoma. With estimated number of visitors in hand, it gives me ample time to prepare products for my clients’ satisfaction. In terms of my daily life, Statistics help me in understanding my daily household needs hence make proper expenditures.” Mr. Kulwa James Zimba, Artist, Sixth street Dodoma.”. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical Data is useful for development at family as well as national level because without statistics one cannot plan and implement development plans properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination Meeting Held in Arusha, Tanzania (10 December 2019)
    REPORT OF THE WILLOWS IMPACT EVALUATION (WIE) DISSEMINATION MEETING HELD IN ARUSHA, TANZANIA (10 DECEMBER 2019) PI: Prof. Sia Msuya Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center P.O. Box 3010 Moshi, Tanzania Tel: +255- 2754379 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Table of contents 1.0. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0. Meeting Participants ................................................................................................................ 3 3.0. Meeting Presentations .............................................................................................................. 4 4.0. Discussion and Meeting Recommendations ............................................................................ 6 5.0. Closing Remarks ...................................................................................................................... 9 6.0. Conclusions ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.0. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 12 8.0. Appendices .............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 1.0. Background The Willows Impact Evaluation project (hereafter WIE is a collaborative evaluation programme between (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (hereafter KCMUCo) and the Harvard T.H Chan School
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ‟s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision INVITATION for TENDER TENDER FOR
    World Vision INVITATION FOR TENDER TENDER FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY OF GOODS TENDER No. WVT/TC/03/2021 World Vision Tanzania (WVT) is a Christian relief, development and advocacy Organization, dedicated to working with Children, families and Communities to overcome poverty and injustice. Inspired by our Christian values, we are dedicated to working with the world’s most vulnerable people_ We serve all people regardless of religion, race, ethnicity or gender. 1. The World Vision Tanzania -Head office Arusha invites sealed tenders from eligible Contractor class six and above (class 1 to 6) Registered by CRB-Tanzania (Local Contractor Categories) in Civil -for construction of water supply projects, building projects and drilling of Boreholes_ These works shall be executed in Kagera, Tanga, Dodoma, Simiyu, Arusha and Manyara Regions. Also bidders are invited to submit their bids for supply of beehive kit and its accessories. 2. The Scope of work involves Construction of water supply projects, construction of Buildings (Classrooms, Latrines at schools and Supply of beehive kit and its accessories. 3. Site visits for all construction related works shall be conducted as per schedule shown in the tender documents. CATEGORY A: CONSTRUCTION WORKS 1. Lot 1: Rukoma & Bushangaro Aps Water Projects; -Construction of Nsheshe Water Project -Rukoma· AP -Bukoba District -Kagera Region. -Construction of 10 distribution point at Kamagambo water project bushangaro-Karagwe District- Bushangaro AP-Kagera Region 2. Lot II: lzigo and Mbuka Aps Water projects; -Construction of Kimbugu water project at lzigo Ap-Muleba District Council -Construction of Water project at Bisheke village in Mbuka Ap -Muleba District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Arumeru District Catherine W
    Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania Conservation agriculture in Africa series Series editors Bernard Triomphe Josef Kienzle Martin Bwalya Soren Damgaard-Larsen Titles Conservation agriculture as practised in Ghana Philip Boahen, Benjamin Addo Dartey, Genevieve Delali Dogbe, E. Asare Boadi, Bernard Triomphe, Soren Daamgard-Larsen, John Ashburner Conservation agriculture: a Uganda case study Paul Nyende, Anthony Nyakuni, John Peter Opio, Wilfred Odogola Conservation agriculture in Zambia: a case study of Southern Province Frédéric Baudron, Herbert M. Mwanza, Bernard Triomphe, Martin Bwalya Conservation agriculture as practised in Kenya: two case studies Pascal Kaumbutho, Josef Kienzle, editors Laikipia District Tom Apina, Paul Wamai, Philip Mwangi Siaya District Philip K. Mwangi, Kennedy O. Okelo, Tom Apina Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: three case studies Richard Shetto, Marietha Owenya, editors Arumeru District Catherine W. Maguzu, Dominick E. Ringo, Wilfred Mariki, Marietha Owenya, Flora Kola, Charles Leseyo Karatu District Dominick E. Ringo, Catherine W. Maguzu, Wilfred Mariki, Marietha Owenya, Njumbo, Frank Swai Mbeya District Saidi Mkomwa, Ahaz Mussei, Remmy Mwakimbwala, Ndabhemeye Mulengera, Elimpaa Kiranga Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: three case studies Richard Shetto, Marietha Owenya, editors Arumeru District Karatu District Mbeya District Publishers African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT) PO Box 14733, Westlands Nairobi 00800, Kenya tel and fax: +254 20 445 1391 website:
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Study of Three Villages in Karatu District Tanzani A
    SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSIT Y & THE OPEN UNIVERSITY OF TANZANI A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN T (2005-2007) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION O F COMMUNITY BASED ENVIRONMENTA L CONSERVATION PROJECTS THE CASE STUDY OF THREE VILLAGES IN KARATU DISTRICT TANZANI A THE PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED I N PARTIAL FULFILMEN T FO R THE REQUIREMENTS O F THE MASTER OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN T (MSc-CED). SALUSTIN N . HALL U i SUPERVISOR'S CERTIFICATIO N I, D r Jame s Lweikiz a Kisoza , I certify tha t I have thoroughly rea d this projec t report o f Salusti n Nicola s Hall u title d PERFORMANC E EVALUATIO N O F COMMUNITY BASED ENVIRONMENTA L CONSERVATION PROJECTS . And found it to be in an acceptable form for submission ii COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means of electronic retrieval or mechanical, without prio r permission of the author. iii DECLARATION I, Salusti n Nicola s Hallu , d o hereb y declar e t o th e SENAT E o f th e Ope n University o f Tanzania that this projec t pape r i s the resul t o f m y original findings , and tha t i t ha s no t bee n submitte d fo r th e simila r degre e awar d i n an y othe r University. iv DEDICATION I extend m y appreciatio n to m y family fo r thei r understanding , when the y misse d my ful l fatherl y car e when I was bus y undergoin g schedule s for m y MS c CED degree programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Knowledge of Soils Among the Iraqw in Selected Villages in Mbulu and Karatu Districts: Implications for Research Interventions
    Mwaseba D. et al.: Local knowledge of soils among the Iraqw in Mbulu 150 LOCAL KNOWLEDGE OF SOILS AMONG THE IRAQW IN SELECTED VILLAGES IN MBULU AND KARATU DISTRICTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH INTERVENTIONS Mwaseba1, D., Msanya1, B.M., Ole-Meiludie 2, D.J. and Massawe 3, A.W. 1Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3022, Morogoro, Tanzania 2 Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, TOSCA, P.O. Box 1056 Morogoro, Tanzania 3 Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Rodent Control Centre, P.O. Box 3047 Morogoro, Tanzania ABSTRACT This article reports on some findings from an on-going study in seven villages in Mbulu and Karatu Districts. These are Kainam, Gunyoda and Moringa (Mbulu District) and Kambi ya Simba, Kilima Tembo, Rhotia Kati and Kansay (Karatu District). The selected villages are predominantly inhabited by the Iraqw who are Afroasiatic or Hamitic- Cushitic speaking people. They form 65% of the people in the two districts. Using a combination of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and formal surveys the study found that there is a wealth of knowledge with regard to soil classification in the area. On the whole farmers use various criteria to classify their soils that also guide land use decisions. However, reliance on local knowledge in the classification of soils, landforms and land use is more common with small-scale agriculture, wh ereas large-scale farmers particularly in Karatu District rely more on research recommendations communicated to them through the public extension service or by researchers themselves to improve productivity in the area. While acknowledging the wealth of local knowledge in the area, the study recommends for scientific research interventions in partnerships with the local people in order to address existing land use limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Baseline Study for Hand in Hand Eastern Africa Program in Northern Tanzania August 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables.......................................................................................................................... 3 List of figures ........................................................................................................................ 4 List of Abbreviations.............................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgement................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Overview of HiH EA Model.................................................................................... 13 1.2 HiH EA Expansion Plan for Tanzania.................................................................... 14 2. The Baseline Study...................................................................................................... 15 2.1 The Scoping Study................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Objectives of the Scoping
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Manyara Watershed Assessment
    USFS - Greg Bevenger Photo/ Lake Manyara Watershed Assessment Progress Report December 2003 Lake Manyara Watershed Assessment: Progress Report—December 2003 1 I. LAKE MANYARA WATERSHED ASSESSMENT Overview African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) has initiated a detailed assessment of the Lake Manyara watershed, which is one of two catchment basins that sustain the Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem, in northern Tanzania. Through a partnership with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), AWF is working to protect forest, soil and water resources in important African landscapes, through its African Heartland program. To address concerns of habitat fragmentation and environmental degradation within the Lake Manyara watershed AWF has partnered with local stakeholders and the USFS to conduct an assessment of the watershed. AWF is leading the assessment, which includes development of a GIS and associated database, and compilation of relevant information related to the Lake Manyara watershed. USFS is providing technical assistance in watershed science, as well as financial support. AWF is building upon the considerable work that has already been undertaken by partners in the region1, in order to improve the conservation of natural resources in this important landscape. AWF and USFS are conducting this assessment through a process that aims to characterize ecosystem elements from a watershed perspective, identify key issues and problems in the watershed, and ultimately provide management recommendations. Masai Steppe Heartland The assessment is being implemented through AWF’s African Heartland program, which is a collaborative, landscape-level management approach to conserving Africa’s unique wildlife resources. Heartlands are large areas of exceptional natural value where AWF works with a variety of partners, including local people, governments and other resource users to ensure these landscapes are prioritized for conservation and are kept ecologically and economically viable.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFILE of ARUSHA REGION Arusha Region Is One of Tanzania's 31 Administrative Regions
    PROFILE OF ARUSHA REGION Arusha Region is one of Tanzania's 31 administrative regions. Its capital and largest city is the city of Arusha. The region is bordered by Kajiado County and Narok County in Kenya to the north, the Kilimanjaro Region to the east, the Manyara and Singida regions to the south, and the Mara and Simiyu regions to the west. Major towns include Monduli, Namanga, Longido, and Loliondo to the north, Mto wa Mbu and Karatu to the west, and Usa River to the east. The region is comparable in size to the combined land and water areas of the United States state of Maryland] Arusha Region is a global tourist destination and is the center of the northern Tanzania safari circuit. The national parks and reserves in this region include Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Arusha National Park, the Loliondo Game Controlled Area, and part of Lake Manyara National Park. Remains of 600-year-old stone structures are found at Engaruka, just off the dirt road between Mto wa Mbu and Lake Natron. With a HDI of 0.721, Arusha is one among the most developed regions of Tanzania. History Much of the present area of Arusha Region used to be Maasai land. The Maasai are still the dominant community in the region. their influence is reflected in the present names of towns, regional culture, cuisine, and geographical features. The administrative region of Arusha existed in 1922 while mainland Tanzania was a British mandate under the League of Nations and known as Tanganyika. In 1948, the area was in the Northern Province, which includes the present day regions of Manyara and Kilimanjaro.
    [Show full text]
  • Arusha District Council
    ARUSHA DISTRICT COUNCIL INVESTMENT PROFILE DISCLOSE THE POTENTIAL OF ARUSHA DISTRICT COUNCIL February, 2017 FOREWORD I would like to welcome all esteemed investors to explore the irresistible opportunities provided by the Arusha District Council. Arusha District Council was established in 2007, the Council has a vision of to be a leading transformed Council that provides high quality services for Sustainable Development of the Community by 2025. In order to increase competitiveness in attracting investors to our District Council, effort and initiative to identify, expose and promote investment opportunities available in Arusha District Council is going on. We are indeed determined to utilize potential areas owned by the Council, Communities and those own by private developer. In this Investment Profile, we give you opportunities to realize your entrepreneurial ambitions and explore them. We believe in supporting our investors’ aspirations as the Council. As we want to be one among the leading investment avenues in Tanzania. In Arusha District Council investors are favoured with presence of suitable investment climate that will help you capitalize on untapped opportunities in Arusha and Tanzania as a whole. Whereby investment can be done to the following areas of interests include tourism, processing industries, livestock and agricultural sector, beekeeping, sports and recreation centre, modern market, real estate, socio-economic services. Investment climate is characterised by peace and stability, availability of raw materials, market, abundant natural resources, road and transportation network, electricity services and the strategic geographical location will support establishment and success of investments. It is because of the above mention few facts we are proud to say that Arusha District Council is the best investment destination of your choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Waache Wasome Let Them Learn
    Waache Wasome Let Them Learn TANZANIA Quarterly Progress Report Y 3 Q1 October 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-17-00001 Submitted by the Bantwana Initiative of World Education, Inc. (WEI/Bantwana) Waache Wasome Let Them Learn Tanzania | Y3 Q1 Progress Report 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Project Activities .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Objective 1: Build the agency, knowledge, and protective assets of girls in secondary school ..... 8 Objective 2: Increase family commitment and capacity to invest in girls’ education...................... 10 Objective 3: Foster a girl friendly and supportive school environment ............................................ 20 Objective 4…………………………………………………………………………….……….30 C. Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning ................................................................................................. 35 D. Project Management .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]