6902 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

‘‘single window’’ through which update control numbers assigned to PART 200—ORGANIZATION; exporters can comply with export laws information collection requirements of CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND and regulations. We received no the Commission by the Office of INFORMATION AND REQUESTS comments on the certification in the Management and Budget pursuant to the proposed rule; accordingly, no Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. Subpart N—Commission Information Regulatory Flexibility analysis is Collection Requirements Under the required and none has been prepared. DATES: Effective date: February 9, 2015. Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB Control Numbers Executive Orders FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel K. Chang, Senior Counsel, at This rule has been determined to be ■ 1. The authority citation for part 200, (202) 551–6792, Office of Regulatory subpart N, continues to read as follows: not significant for purposes of Executive Policy, Division of Investment Orders 12866 and 13563, and has been Management, U.S. Securities and Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506; 44 U.S.C. 3507. drafted according to the requirements of Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., those Executive Orders. It has also been § 200.800 [Amended] Washington, DC 20549–8549. determined that this rule does not ■ 2. In § 200.800(b), in the table, remove contain policies with federalism SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The the following entries: Form ET, implications as that term is defined Commission published a final rule at 76 wherever it appears; Rule 1(a); Rule under Executive Order 13132. FR 71872, on November 21, 2011, which 1(b); Rule 1(c); Rule 2; Rule 3; Rule 7; Rule 7(d); Rule 20(b); Rule 20(c); Rule Paperwork Reduction Act rescinded rules and forms adopted under the Public Utility Holding 20(d); Rule 23; Rule 24; Rule 26; Rule 29; Rule 44; Rule 45; Rule 47(b); Rule This rule does not contain any Company Act (‘‘PUHCA’’),1 revised 52; Form 53; Rule 54; Rule 57(a); Rule information collection subject to the other rules and forms to correct 57(b); Rule 58; Rule 62; Rule 71(a); Rule Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). outdated references to PUHCA, However, notwithstanding any other 72; Rule 83; Rule 87; Rule 88; Rule 93; corrected outdated references due to provision of law, no person is required Rule 94; Rule 95; Rule 100(a); Uniform enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall to respond to, nor shall a person be System of Accounts for Mutual Service subject to a penalty for failure to comply Street Reform and Consumer Protection Companies and Subsidiary Service with, a collection of information subject Act of 2010 (‘‘the Dodd-Frank Act’’), Companies, Public Utility Holding 2 to the requirements of the PRA, unless and made other ministerial corrections. Company Act of 1935; Preservation and that collection of information displays a Congress repealed PUHCA effective Destruction of Records of Registered current, valid Office of Management and 2006, and the Dodd-Frank Act amended Public Utility Holding Companies and Budget (OMB) control number. various provisions of the federal of Mutual and Subsidiary Service securities laws and removed references Companies; Form U5A; Form U5B; List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 30 to PUHCA from those laws. Form U5S; Form U–1; Form U–13–1; Economic statistics, Exports, Foreign The final rule contained a Form U–6B–2; Form U–57; Form U–9C– trade, Reporting, and recordkeeping typographical error that prevented an 3; Form U–12(I)–A; Form U–12(I)–B; requirements. amendment to the Code of Federal Form U–13E–1; Form U–R–1; Form U– Accordingly, as discussed above, the Regulations.3 This technical amendment 13–60; Form U–3A–2; Form U–3A3–1; interim final rule amending title 15, is being published so that the table in Form U–7D; Form U–33–S; Form ID, 259.602, 3235–0328; and Form SE., Code of Federal Regulations, part 30, 17 CFR 200.800(b) can be updated to 259.603, 3235–0327. which was published at 79 FR 49659 on reflect that amendment. August 22, 2014, is adopted as a final Dated: February 3, 2015. rule without change. List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 200 Brent J. Fields, Dated: January 30, 2015. Administrative practice and Secretary. John H. Thompson, procedure, Authority delegations [FR Doc. 2015–02465 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] Director, Bureau of the Census. (Government agencies), Classified BILLING CODE 8011–01–P [FR Doc. 2015–02520 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] information, Conflicts of interest, BILLING CODE 3510–07–P Government employees, Organization and functions (Government agencies). DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Text of the Amendments Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau COMMISSION For the reasons set out in the 17 CFR Part 200 preamble, Title 17, Chapter II of the 27 CFR Part 9 Code of Federal Regulations is amended [Release No. 33–9273A, 34–65686A, 39– as follows: [Docket No. TTB–2014–0003; T.D. TTB–127; 2480A, IA–3310A and IC–29855A] Ref: Notice No. 142] RIN 1513–AC05 Rescission of Outdated Rules and Forms, and Amendments To Correct Establishment of The Rocks District of References Milton-Freewater Viticultural Area AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 1 15 U.S.C. 79 (repealed effective 2006). AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Commission. 2 Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). Trade Bureau, Treasury. ACTION: Technical amendment. 3 The final rule incorrectly referenced 17 CFR ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. 200.80(b) of Subpart M, rather than 17 CFR SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange 200.800(b) of Subpart N. As a result of the incorrect SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) reference, the table in 17 CFR 200.800(b) of Subpart and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the is making technical amendments to N was not amended. approximately 3,770-acre ‘‘The Rocks

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Feb 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1 rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 6903

District of Milton-Freewater’’ and a delineated boundary, as 9.74), which covers multiple counties in viticultural area in Umatilla County, established in part 9 of the regulations. Washington and Oregon. The proposed Oregon. The viticultural area lies These designations allow vintners and AVA contains approximately 3,770 entirely within the Walla Walla Valley consumers to attribute a given quality, acres and has approximately 250 acres viticultural area which, in turn, lies reputation, or other characteristic of a of commercially producing vineyards. within the Columbia Valley viticultural wine made from grapes grown in an area The petition names 19 wine producers area. TTB designates viticultural areas to the wine’s geographic origin. The that have vineyards within the proposed to allow vintners to better describe the establishment of AVAs allows vintners AVA, and it notes that three of the 19 origin of their wines and to allow to describe more accurately the origin of producers also have winery facilities consumers to better identify wines they their wines to consumers and helps within the proposed AVA. may purchase. consumers to identify wines they may According to the petition, the DATES: This final rule is effective March purchase. Establishment of an AVA is distinguishing feature of the proposed 11, 2015. neither an approval nor an endorsement The Rocks District of Milton-Freewater FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: by TTB of the wine produced in that AVA is its soil. Approximately 96 Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and area. percent of the proposed AVA is covered with soil from the Freewater series, Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Requirements Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street including Freewater very cobbly loam NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB and Freewater gravelly silt loam. These phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175. regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines soils contain large amounts of loose, uncemented gravel, cobbles, and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any interested party boulders that form very deep layers. The Background on Viticultural Areas may petition TTB to establish a grape- rockiness of Freewater series soils prevents erosion and discourages rot TTB Authority growing region as an AVA. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) and mildew by allowing water to drain Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol prescribes standards for petitions for the freely. The depth of the soil allows roots Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 establishment or modification of AVAs. to penetrate 30 feet or more before U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary Petitions to establish an AVA must hitting a restrictive layer of bedrock or of the Treasury to prescribe regulations include the following: cemented soil. The numerous cobbles in for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, • Evidence that the area within the the soil absorb and store solar radiation, and malt beverages. The FAA Act proposed AVA boundary is nationally which raises the soil and air provides that these regulations should, or locally known by the AVA name temperatures and reduces the risk of among other things, prohibit consumer specified in the petition; frost damage in the late spring and early deception and the use of misleading • An explanation of the basis for fall. Finally, soils of the Freewater series statements on labels and ensure that defining the boundary of the proposed contain high amounts of calcium, labels provide the consumer with AVA; titanium, and iron, which are important adequate information as to the identity • A narrative description of the nutrients for vine growth. and quality of the product. The Alcohol features of the proposed AVA affecting By contrast, the soils surrounding the and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau viticulture, such as climate, geology, proposed The Rocks District of Milton- (TTB) administers the FAA Act soils, physical features, and elevation, Freewater AVA are silt loams from the pursuant to section 1111(d) of the that make the proposed AVA distinctive Walla Walla, Ellisforde, Yakima, Homeland Security Act of 2002, and distinguish it from adjacent areas Umapine, Hermison, Onyx, and Oliphan codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The outside the proposed AVA boundary; series. Cobbles are uncommon or Secretary has delegated various • The appropriate United States entirely absent from these soils. The authorities through Treasury Geological Survey (USGS) map(s) soils are also not as deep as soils of the Department Order 120–01 (Revised), showing the location of the proposed Freewater series and are often underlain dated December 10, 2013, to the TTB AVA, with the boundary of the by dense, compacted layers of sand and Administrator to perform the functions proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; silt called ‘‘Touchet beds.’’ The soils are and duties in the administration and and also less resistant to erosion than enforcement of this law. • A detailed narrative description of Freewater series soils and contain lower Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR the proposed AVA boundary based on levels of calcium, titanium, and iron. part 4) authorizes the establishment of USGS map markings. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and definitive viticultural areas and the use The Rocks District of Milton-Freewater Comments Received of their names as appellations of origin Petition on wine labels and in wine TTB published Notice No. 142 in the advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB TTB received a petition from Dr. Federal Register on February 26, 2014 regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth Kevin R. Pogue, a professor of geology (79 FR 10742), proposing to establish standards for the preparation and at Whitman College in Walla Walla, The Rocks District of Milton-Freewater submission of petitions for the Washington, proposing the AVA. In the proposed rule, TTB establishment or modification of establishment of the ‘‘The Rocks District summarized the evidence from the American viticultural areas (AVAs) and of Milton-Freewater’’ AVA in Umatilla petition regarding the name, boundary, lists the approved AVAs. County, Oregon, near the town of and distinguishing feature—its cobbly Milton-Freewater. The proposed AVA soils—for the proposed AVA. The Definition lies entirely within the Oregon portion proposed rule also compared the Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB of the Walla Walla Valley AVA (27 CFR distinguishing feature of the proposed regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines 9.91), which covers portions of Walla AVA to the surrounding areas. For a a viticultural area for American wine as Walla County, Washington and Umatilla detailed description of the evidence a delimited grape-growing region having County, Oregon. The Walla Walla Valley relating to the name, boundary, and distinguishing features, as described in AVA is, in turn, entirely within the distinguishing feature of the proposed part 9 of the regulations, and a name larger Columbia Valley AVA (27 CFR AVA, and for a comparison of the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Feb 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1 rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES 6904 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

distinguishing feature of the proposed or soils series contacts on published Valley’’ AVA names, due to the AVA to the surrounding areas, see geologic and soil maps.’’ proposed AVA’s location within both of Notice No. 142. Section 9.12(a)(4) of the TTB those multistate AVAs, but the wines In Notice No. 142, TTB solicited regulations (27 CFR 9.12(a)(4)) requires would not be eligible to use ‘‘The Rocks comments on the accuracy of the name, proposed AVA boundaries to be drawn District of Milton-Freewater’’ as an boundary, and other required using features found on USGS maps, appellation of origin because the wine is information submitted in support of the such as roads, elevation contours, range finished in Washington, outside the petition. In addition, TTB solicited and township lines, rivers, and state in which the AVA is located. comments on whether the geographic mountain peaks. TTB’s requirement Each of the 16 comments stated that features of the proposed The Rocks mandating the use of this type of map TTB should amend its regulations to District of Milton-Freewater AVA are so to mark AVA boundaries facilitates the allow wines produced primarily from distinguishable from the established establishment of new AVAs that share a grapes grown within the proposed AVA Walla Walla Valley AVA and Columbia concurrent boundary, or are located to be labeled with ‘‘The Rocks District Valley AVA that the proposed AVA entirely within or entirely overlap an of Milton-Freewater’’ AVA name even if should not be part of those AVAs. established AVA, by ensuring that the the wines are produced in facilities in Additionally, TTB asked for comments features used to draw the boundary of Washington. Of these commenters, 9 from winemakers who produce wine one AVA also appear on the maps used were from individuals who specifically made primarily from grapes grown to draw the boundary of the other. For stated that they own vineyards within within the proposed AVA but who example, it would be difficult to the proposed AVA but own or use would be ineligible to use the proposed determine the exact location of a new facilities in Walla Walla for the AVA name because their wines are fully AVA in relation to an established AVA production of wine (comments 5, 6, 7, finished in facilities located in the if the new AVA’s boundaries followed 9, 10, 11, 13, 18, and 19). Four nearby city of Walla Walla, Washington. elevation contours and roads found on comments (comments 2, 3, 8, and 15) The comment period closed on April 28, a USGS map, but the established AVA’s were from individuals who would not 2014. boundaries were marked on a soil be affected directly by the TTB survey map that did not include restriction but still expressed support Comments Received elevation contours or roads. for amending the regulations in order to In response to Notice No. 142, TTB Furthermore, amending the regulation benefit other growers and winemakers received a total of 20 comments, all of requiring the use of USGS maps for who may be impacted. An additional which supported the establishment of AVA boundary descriptions is outside comment (comment 16) was from the The Rocks District of Milton-Freewater the scope of the notice of proposed Walla Walla Valley Wine Alliance, on AVA. Commenters included local rulemaking to establish The Rocks behalf of its members in both vineyard owners and winemakers, a District of Milton-Freewater AVA and Washington and Oregon. Another wine reporter, and a regional alliance of would require a separate rulemaking. comment was from the editor and winemakers. TTB received no Therefore, TTB is not taking any action publisher of Washington Wine Report comments opposing the establishment on this comment in this final rule. (comment 17). The final comment of The Rocks District of Milton- (comment 20) was submitted on behalf Impact on Wines Fully Finished Across Freewater AVA. TTB also did not of a California-based winery and a State Lines receive any comments in response to its Washington-based winery, both of question of whether the proposed The Of the 20 comments received in which source grapes from the proposed Rocks District of Milton-Freewater AVA response to Notice No. 142, 16 AVA. is so distinguishable from the comments addressed the issue of wines All 16 of the comments essentially established Walla Walla Valley and fully finished in the State of Washington stated that it is unreasonable for TTB to Columbia Valley AVAs that the from grapes grown primarily within the allow wine made with grapes grown proposed AVAs should not be part of proposed The Rocks District of Milton- within the proposed AVA and fully the established AVAs. Freewater AVA (comments 2, 3, 5–11, finished in Washington to be labeled 13, and 15–20). Section 4.25(e)(3)(iv) of with the ‘‘Walla Walla Valley’’ or Use of USGS Topographic Maps To TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)(iv)) ‘‘Columbia Valley’’ viticultural areas as Draw AVA Boundaries requires wines labeled with an AVA appellations of origin, but not with ‘‘The One of the comments (comment 14) appellation of origin to be ‘‘fully Rocks District of Milton-Freewater.’’ was from the owner of a vineyard and finished within the State, or one of the One commenter (comment 3) stated that winery located within the proposed States, within which the labeled the current TTB regulations would AVA. Although the commenter viticultural area is located.’’ Currently, ‘‘jeopardize the vineyard owners’ ability expressed support for the establishment there are individuals who use facilities to sell their grapes as the number of of the proposed AVA, he also stated his in the nearby city of Walla Walla, winemakers within a reasonable range concern regarding TTB’s requirement Washington, to fully finish wine made who finish their wines in Oregon is that AVA boundaries be drawn using primarily from grapes grown within the limited.’’ Another commenter (comment features found on USGS topographic proposed AVA, in part because of a lack 6) believes the regulations should be maps. The commenter stated that of custom crush or alternating changed because ‘‘almost all of the because only USGS maps were used to proprietorship facilities nearby in grapes grown [within the proposed draw the boundary, the proposed AVA Oregon. Additionally, several winery AVA] are used by Washington wineries contains some soil that is not of the owners located in Walla Walla stated . . . ,’’ meaning that very few wines Freewater series, which is the that they also own vineyards within the would be eligible to use the proposed distinguishing feature of the proposed proposed AVA and currently produce AVA name as an appellation of origin. AVA, and also omits small pockets of wines from those grapes in their Walla The Walla Walla Valley Wine Alliance land containing Freewater series soils. Walla facilities. Under the current TTB (comment 16) also notes that ‘‘[w]ines The commenter suggested that TTB regulations, such Washington-produced made in Washington from grapes amend its regulations to allow AVA wines would be eligible to use the sourced within the proposed AVA boundaries to be drawn using ‘‘geologic ‘‘Walla Walla Valley’’ or ‘‘Columbia constitute a significant percentage of the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Feb 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1 rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 6905

wines produced by several Washington response to Notice No. 142 indicates the wine’s true place of origin. For a wineries,’’ none of which would be able that there is at least regional support for wine to be labeled with an AVA name to use the proposed AVA name as an amending the regulations regarding the or with a brand name that includes an appellation of origin. use of AVA names as appellations of AVA name, at least 85 percent of the A small wine producing company that origin. Therefore, elsewhere in this wine must be derived from grapes owns a vineyard within the proposed issue of the Federal Register, TTB is grown within the area represented by AVA states that it uses a custom crush publishing a notice of proposed that name, and the wine must meet the facility in the city of Walla Walla rulemaking, Notice No. 147, proposing other conditions listed in 27 CFR because ‘‘[t]his is a very practical to allow wine to be labeled with an 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for business model for us because of the AVA appellation of origin if the wine is labeling with an AVA name and that high cost of building a facility and the fully finished, except for cellar name appears in the brand name, then concentration of resources * * * in treatment or blending that does not alter the label is not in compliance and the Walla Walla’’ (comment 13). The the class and type of the wine, in a State bottler must change the brand name and company goes on to say that the adjacent to the State in which the AVA obtain approval of a new label. inability to use ‘‘The Rocks District of is located. Please refer to Notice No. 147 Similarly, if the AVA name appears in Milton-Freewater’’ as an appellation of for information on how to submit another reference on the label in a origin for their wines ‘‘will be confusing comments to TTB regarding the misleading manner, the bottler would to consumers’’ because wine that is, in proposed amendment to the regulations. have to obtain approval of a new label. the commenter’s words, ‘‘100% ‘The Different rules apply if a wine has a Rocks District’ wine’’ will have to be TTB Determination brand name containing an AVA name labeled as ‘‘Walla Walla Valley’’ or After careful review of the petition that was used as a brand name on a ‘‘Columbia Valley.’’ Because a and the comments received in response label approved before July 7, 1986. See viticultural area designation is meant to to Notice No. 142, TTB finds that the 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details. allow vintners to better describe the evidence provided by the petitioner With the establishment of this AVA, origin of their wines and to allow supports the establishment of The Rocks its name, ‘‘The Rocks District of Milton- consumers to better identify wines they District of Milton-Freewater AVA. Freewater,’’ will be recognized as a may purchase, the commenter believes Accordingly, under the authority of the name of viticultural significance under that the company’s use of ‘‘The Rocks FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the § 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 District of Milton-Freewater’’ as an Homeland Security Act of 2002, and CFR 4.39(i)(3)). TTB has also appellation of origin on their wines will part 4 of the TTB regulations, TTB determined that the phrase ‘‘The Rocks further both aforementioned goals. establishes the ‘‘The Rocks District of of Milton-Freewater’’ has viticultural Finally, the editor and publisher of Milton-Freewater’’ AVA in Umatilla significance in relation to the AVA. The the Washington Wine Report (comment County, Oregon, effective 30 days from text of the regulation clarifies this point. 17) offered a scenario to demonstrate the the publication date of this document. Consequently, wine bottlers using the ‘‘contradictions’’ inherent in the current TTB has also determined that The name ‘‘The Rocks District of Milton- TTB regulations. He notes that ‘‘a Rocks District of Milton-Freewater AVA Freewater’’ or ‘‘The Rocks of Milton- winery could source grapes from The will remain part of both the established Freewater’’ in a brand name, including Rocks District and then drive 450 miles Walla Walla Valley and Columbia a trademark, or in another label down to the Rogue Valley [in Valley AVAs. As discussed in Notice reference as to the origin of the wine, southwestern Oregon] and label the No. 142, the elevations, topography, will have to ensure that the product is wines as from The Rocks District of growing season, and climate of The eligible to use the AVA name as an Milton-Freewater.’’ He continues, Rocks District of Milton-Freewater AVA appellation of origin. ‘‘However, a winery would not be able are similar to those of both the Walla The establishment of The Rocks to truck the grapes 10 miles north to Walla Valley and Columbia Valley District of Milton-Freewater AVA will Walla Walla and do the same . . . . This AVAs. However, approximately 96 not affect any existing AVA, and any defies logic and surely was not the percent of The Rocks District of Milton- bottlers using ‘‘Walla Walla Valley’’ or intention of this regulation.’’ Freewater AVA is covered by heavily ‘‘Columbia Valley’’ as an appellation of TTB believes that amending the cobbled Freewater series soils, which origin or in a brand name for wines regulations in 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)(iv) to are found only in miniscule amounts made from grapes grown within the allow AVA appellations of origin on elsewhere in the Walla Walla Valley and Walla Walla Valley or Columbia Valley labels of wine made outside the State in Columbia Valley AVAs, thus AVAs will not be affected by the which the AVA is located would require distinguishing the proposed AVA from establishment of this new AVA. The a notice of proposed rulemaking and the existing, surrounding AVAs. establishment of The Rocks District of public comment period. Although Milton-Freewater AVA will allow Notice No. 142 requested comments Boundary Description vintners to use ‘‘The Rocks District of concerning the appellation of origin See the narrative description of the Milton-Freewater,’’ ‘‘Walla Walla regulations, the proposed rule did not boundary of the AVA in the regulatory Valley,’’ and ‘‘Columbia Valley’’ as formally propose any specific changes text published at the end of this final appellations of origin for wines made to those regulations. Additionally, any rule. from grapes grown within The Rocks changes to the regulations concerning District of Milton-Freewater AVA, if the the use of AVA names as appellations Maps wines meet the eligibility requirements of origin would apply not only to The petitioner provided the required for the appellation. persons wanting to use ‘‘The Rocks maps, and they are listed below in the Regulatory Flexibility Act District of Milton-Freewater’’ as an regulatory text. appellation of origin. Therefore, TTB is TTB certifies that this regulation will not proposing to make any changes to Impact on Current Wine Labels not have a significant economic impact the regulation in this final rule. Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits on a substantial number of small However, TTB believes that the any label reference on a wine that entities. The regulation imposes no new number of comments submitted in indicates or implies an origin other than reporting, recordkeeping, or other

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Feb 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1 rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES 6906 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

administrative requirement. Any benefit Highway (State Route 339) and an Signed: December 2, 2014. derived from the use of an AVA name unnamed light-duty road known locally John J. Manfreda, would be the result of a proprietor’s as Crockett Road, section 26, T6N/R35E. Administrator. efforts and consumer acceptance of From the beginning point, proceed east- Approved: December 22, 2014. wines from that area. Therefore, no southeasterly in a straight line for 0.8 Timothy E. Skud, regulatory flexibility analysis is mile to the intersection of State Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and required. Highway 11 (Oregon-Washington Tariff Policy). Highway) and an unnamed light-duty Executive Order 12866 [FR Doc. 2015–02553 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] road known locally as Appleton Road, BILLING CODE 4810–31–P It has been determined that this final section 25, T6N/R35E; then rule is not a significant regulatory action (2) Proceed southeasterly in a straight as defined by Executive Order 12866 of line for 1.05 miles, crossing onto the September 30, 1993. Therefore, no DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Bowlus Hill map, to the intersection of SECURITY regulatory assessment is required. three unnamed light-duty roads known Drafting Information locally as Grant Road, Turbyne Road, Coast Guard and Pratt Lane on the common Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations boundary between section 36, T6N/ 33 CFR Part 117 and Rulings Division drafted this final R35E, and section 31, T5N/R36E; then rule. (3) Proceed southwesterly in a straight [Docket No. USCG–2015–0050] List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 line for 1.1 miles, crossing back onto the Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Milton-Freewater map, to the Wine. Willamette River, Portland, OR intersection of the Union Pacific The Regulatory Amendment railroad tracks with the Walla Walla AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. For the reasons discussed in the River, section 1, T5N/R35E; then ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter (4) Proceed southwesterly and then from drawbridge regulation. west-northwesterly along the Union I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a follows: Pacific railroad tracks for 1.2 miles to the intersection of the railroad tracks temporary deviation from the operating PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL with the 980-foot elevation contour line, schedule that governs the Burlington AREAS approximately 0.15 mile west of Lamb Northern Santa Fe Railway Bridge, also Street, section 2, T5N/R35E; then known as the St. Johns RR Bridge, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 (5) Proceed west-northwesterly in a across the Willamette River, mile 6.9, at continues to read as follows: straight line for 2.25 miles to the Portland, OR. The deviation is necessary to facilitate installation of new rail Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. intersection of the 840-foot elevation contour line and an unnamed light-duty joints. This deviation allows the bridge Subpart C—Approved American road known locally as Lower Dry Creek to remain in the closed to navigation Viticultural Areas Road, section 33, T6N/R35E; then position during maintenance activities. (6) Proceed northwesterly in a straight DATES: This deviation is effective from ■ 2. Subpart C is amended by adding line for 0.8 mile to the intersection of 7 a.m. on February 12, 2015 to noon on § 9.249 to read as follows: the 800-foot elevation contour line with February 13, 2015. ADDRESSES: § 9.249 The Rocks District of Milton– an unnamed light-duty road running The docket for this Freewater. north-south in section 32, T6N/R35E; deviation, [USCG–2015–0050] is available at http://www.regulations.gov. (a) Name. The name of the viticultural then Type the docket number in the area described in this section is ‘‘The (7) Proceed easterly in a straight line ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Rocks District of Milton-Freewater’’. For for 0.9 mile to the intersection of the Click on Open Docket Folder on the line purposes of part 4 of this chapter, ‘‘The 840-foot elevation contour line with the associated with this deviation. You may Rocks District of Milton-Freewater’’ and Hudson Bay Canal, section 33, T6N/ also visit the Docket Management ‘‘The Rocks of Milton-Freewater’’ are R35E; then Facility in Room W12–140 on the terms of viticultural significance. (8) Proceed due north in a straight (b) Approved maps. The two United line for 0.25 mile to the line’s ground floor of the Department of States Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale intersection with Sunnyside Road, Transportation West Building, 1200 topographic maps used to determine the section 33, T6N/T35E; then New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, boundary of The Rocks District of (9) Proceed northeasterly in a straight DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Milton-Freewater viticultural area are line for 0.5 mile to the intersection of Monday through Friday, except Federal titled: the 840-foot elevation contour line with holidays. (1) Milton-Freewater, Oreg., 1964; and an unnamed medium-duty road known FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If (2) Bowlus Hill, Oreg., 1964; locally as State Highway 332 (Umapine you have questions on this temporary photoinspected 1976. Highway), eastern boundary of section deviation, call or email Mr. Steven (c) Boundary. The Rocks District of 28, R6N/T35E; then Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Coast Milton-Freewater viticultural area is (10) Proceed east-northeasterly in a Guard Thirteenth District; telephone located in Umatilla County, Oregon. The straight line for 0.3 mile to the 206–220–7282, email d13-pf- boundary of The Rocks District of intersection of three unnamed light-duty [email protected]. If you have Milton-Freewater viticultural area is as roads known locally as Triangle Road, questions on viewing the docket, call follows: Hodgen Road, and Appleton Road, Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, (1) The beginning point is found on section 27, T6N/R35E; then Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– the Milton-Freewater map at the (11) Proceed east-northeasterly in a 9826. intersection of an unnamed medium- straight line for 1.25 miles, returning to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Burlington duty road known locally as Freewater the beginning point. Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Feb 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1 rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES