<<

Best Practices in the disposal of ships’ .

Capt. Niels Vanlaer 14 October 2010 Exmar Shipmanagement Brussels 3 main sources of Ship’s Waste 3 main sources of Ship’s Waste 1) Propulsion & Machinery – NOX, SOX, CO2 – Oily residues (, lub oil, hydraulic oil) – Water containing oily residues, chemicals,... – 2) Human presence – Garbage: Food waste, Plastics, Paper, Metal, Glass – Grey water (showers, washing) – Black water (toilets & medical facilities) 3) Cargo waste and cargo machinery waste – Cargo dependent: vented gasses, oily residues, slops, packing material – Ballast water Estimated Quantification

Waste IMO Estimated Qty

NOx VI 14 g/kWh (1) Depending trade, vessel,...

SOx VI 10 g/kWh (1) Depending trade, vessel,...

CO2 VI 655 g/kWh (1) Depending trade, vessel,... Water ER I 1350 m3/year <15 ppm oil Food V 10.3 m³/crew x year (2) Flanders: 115 kg/person x yr waste

Plastics V 11.8 m³/crew x year (2)

Other V 11.0 m³/crew x year (2)

Grey water 54 m³/crew x year Treated as Black water Black IV 4-40 m³/crew x year Depending on systems water Cargo I, II, III ? On gas tankers: 0 BWM Ballast convention Up to 52000 t/voy Micro-organisms Air Pollution: NOx, SOx,...

• MARPOL Annex VI: – Ozone depleting substances: prohibited – NOx: operation of marine diesel, gradually increasing demands – SOx: Fuel oil Sulpher content restrictions, SECA-zones (sulphur emmission control areas) – VOCs: to be collected – Shipboard : cargo residues, heavy metals in garbage, non-shipboard and sludge are prohibited. PVCs are limited. • 1999/32/EC Æ Sulphur content of certain liquid • 2005/33/EC Æ 0,1% S-content for vessels at berth • California, Alaska,... & other local regulations Air Pollution • Reduce fuel consumption by: – Speed optimalisation • Adapt speed to meet the ETA (↔ terminals & port responsibility !) • Weather routing – Improved paints Æ up to 9% savings – Design Æ Hull form (trade off with capacity) –Trim (?) Æ (optimal use of the bulbous bow 2.5%) – Improved techniques Æ optimise combustion, consumers,... . – New sources (e.g. Windpower Æ 10%) – Procedures (trade-off with safety) • Adapt fuel – Availability and specifications! – Technical limitations (lubrication,...) – LNG!!! • Effluent gas treatment – Scrubbers, additives, catalysts,... –Heat Recovery Excelerate Energy & Exmar

In addition to the onboard regasification capabilities, the ships calling at Excelerate Energy’s Northeast Gateway deepwater port are equipped with state of the art emissions control equipment that reduces the amount of nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide emissions by over 90%. To further reduce any impact on the environment, the ships have also been fitted with a Heat Recovery System (HRS) that incorporates the from the ship’s central cooling system and the turbine generator into the heating loop of the regasification process. The HRS reduces the amount of water use by 98% and improves the regasification send out by almost 10% while reducing fuel consumption by 16%. ER

• MARPOL Annex I (Chapter III) – Storage of bilge water – Standard discharge connection – Oil Filtering equipment Æ 15 ppm (+ alarm) – Procedures Æ “en-route”, no mixing with cargo residues, documentation – Special Areas • Local regulations Engine Room Water pollution

Oily bilge water means water which may be contaminated by oil resulting from things such as leakage or maintenance in machinery spaces.

- Limit leaks on pump packings (ballast water, fire pumps, cooling water pumps) - Reduce oil leaks as much as possible - Careful use of chemicals for ER cleaning Marpol V

Garbage: “All kinds of Victual, Domestic and operational waste”. Marpol V: Garbage Survey (2006) Garbage survey (2006)

Average m³ of garbage per month

A v erage of O ther A v erage of Plastics Average of Food 6.0 8 6.0 4.5 6 4.5

3.0 4 3.0

2 1.5 1.5

0 0.0 0.0 A v erage of Paper, etc Average of Ground paper 8 6.0

6 4.5

4 3.0

2 1.5

0 0.0 Garbage survey (2006)

Amount of garbage (est. m³) landed or dumped per crewmember per month

Landed/Crew Dumped / Crew 0.6 0.5 0.5

0.4 0.4

0.3 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

0.0 0.0 Garbage survey (2006)

Histogram of average cost ($) per month for landing per vessel 120

100

80

60 Frequency 40

20

0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 Cost Food Waste • MARPOL Annex V - Cat 5 – Disposal at sea allowed for food waste • As far as practically possible from land • No less than 12 nautical miles • Commuted or ground (25mm) no less than 3nm – Special Areas – Garbage Management Plan + Documentation • Local regulations (e.g. USDA) Food Waste

• Optimal use of resources ⇔ Cook’s qualities for: - Use of stored products (quantities, expiry,...) - Re-use of cooked products • Limit waste ⇔ Quality of food ⇔ cultural component • Processing waste • Commuting / grinding • Disposal when allowed • Storage when absolutely necessary only (hygiene on board and in port state <> e.g. USDA). Paper – Glass – Crockery – Metals

• Marpol V - Cat 4 or Cat 3 (when ground) – Paper Æ cardboard packing material – Glass, Crockery Æ very limited – Metals Æ very limited • Can be disposed of at sea ÖPollutant ↔ Not toxic, harmful, long-lasting,... Paper – Glass – Crockery – Metals • Reduce amount of packing material – Discussion with (many) suppliers – Issues of protection of equipment – liability,... • Is reduced on board – Grinders – Incinirators – Compactors • When reduced, mostly disposed ashore! (limited extra cost when combined with plastics) Plastics

• Not allowed to be disposed of at sea • United States: Huge fines – Rewards for whistleblowers Æ cruise industry !!! • Documentary control (Garbage logbook) • Commercial shipping: – Packing material, moorings – PET Bottles • Fishing: nets,... • Yachting?? Derelict Fishing Gear (DFG) The Garbage Patch

Micro Plastics (3) - Great Pacific Garbage Patches - Millions of tons, area’s as large as Texas - Microplastics (333µm – 5 mm) - Sources are still under research, based on type of plastic: - Used in the fabrication of fishing gear (nylons) - Used in the packing industry (polyoleofins & polystyrenes) Plastics • Reduction of plastics: – Plastic recipients for drinks, chemicals,...can be replaced by metals which can be disposed of at sea Æ solution ??? – Plastics in goods & tools (see home) • Reduce amount of packing material – Discussion with (many) suppliers – Issues of protection of equipment – liability,... • Damaged moorings – Limited loss at sea because both ends fixed – Sold if usable (e.g. Suez Canal business) – Disposed ashore Black Water & Grey Water

• Marpol Annex IV • Local regulations – sometimes very difficult to comply with for older (+10 y.) ships Æ esp. Mediterranean. • Main issue in cruising industry !

• Limit water Æ vacuum toilets • Bacterial treatment ↔ sensitive to chemicals, cleaning products,... • High-End technical solutions possible CONCLUSIONS

• Commercial shipping is an industry which produces a certain amount of pollution, as any other industry. • Pollutants are no different than elsewhere BUT • Shipping is highly regulated by Marpol • The Tanker industry is stricktly controlled by customers (Oil Majors) who impose high standards. CONCLUSIONS

• The nature and amount of waste from ships depends on: – Trade – Cargo / no of passengers – Characteristics of vessel (age, engine, crew,...) – Policy of the Owners and Customers

BUT HOW ABOUT: • Fishing vessels (national industry, often less targetted) • Yachting (less regulated and controlled) References

1) Corbett & Koehler, Updated emissions from ocean shipping, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. D20, 4650, doi:10.1029/2003JD003751, 2003 2) Exmar Shipmanagement - Own research in the fleet (2006) 3) Arthur, C., J. Baker and H. Bamford (eds). 2009. Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects and Fate of Microplastic . Sept 9-11, 2008. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-30. 4) McElwee, K. and C. Morishige (eds.). 2010. Proceedings of the Workshop on At-sea Detection and Removal of Derelict Fishing Gear. December 9-10, 2008. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS- OR&R-34.