T Central Lakes Trust Has Made and Is a Reflec- Tion of How Much of a Threat Wilding Pines Are to Our Environment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Solid Fuel Fire Places in Shotover Country & Other
A GUIDE TO SOLID FUEL FIRE PLACES IN SHOTOVER COUNTRY & OTHER ZONES In the following zones, resource consent is required for the installation of new fire places: 01 Why a guideline? 02 Shotover Country Special Zone 03 Millbrook Resort and Waterfall Park Resort Zones 04 Rural Visitor Zones 05 Remarkables Park Zone 06 Ballantyne Road Mixed Use Zone 07 Meadow Park Zone 08 Lake Hayes Estate LDR Zone 09 All Other Zones March 2018 March Page 1/3 // 01 WHY A Using solid fuel to heat buildings is the greatest cause of air pollution in Otago. The effects of emissions from solid fuel burners are also more concentrated in GUIDELINE? some areas than others. For these reasons, the installation of new fire places within the Queenstown Lakes District can in some cases require resource consent under the District Plan. 02 SHOTOVER Solid fuel burning fire places or appliances within Shotover Country are a Non-Complying activity pursuant to 12.30.3.5(viii) of the District Plan and therefore COUNTRY require resource consent. SPECIAL ZONE Please note that the council does not support solid fuel burning fire places, and resource consent applications have been declined for fire places in this zone, which are contrary to policy. Accordingly, applications are not recommended, and will likely continue to be declined. Please contact QLDC planning staff if you are considering installation of a fire place in this zone. 03 MILLBROOK Solid fuel fires in the Millbrook Resort and Waterfall Park Resort zones are a Non-Complying activity pursuant to Zone Standard 12.2.5.2(xiii) of the District Plan RESORT & and therefore require resource consent. -
St Margarets, Frankton
Wakatipu Community Presbyterian Church St John’s Arrowtown, St Andrew’s Queenstown, St Margaret’s Frankton Manna Café, Wakatipu Global Community Ministry Opportunity and Parish Profile Our Mission: To live in Christ, and to grow as a Community of Faith, Hope, Love and Joy. Our Vision: Growing God’s kingdom one life at a time. Our Current Parish Goals: To develop new opportunities for people to know Christ and to worship. To invite people of all ages to faith. To strengthen the existing congregations that they may grow and offer space/protection to the newly formed groups till they are established and strong, and they in turn can nourish and encourage the older congregations. To ensure that discipleship becomes a way of life (for all members) and not simply a programme. To ensure the church is involved in the community, where we are actively seeking ways to be a blessing to all peoples. To strengthen and broaden our leadership to better reach our diverse and growing community. To be a church of positive influence in the community for this and coming generations. We are: Three church centres; three distinct communities, various congregations, One Church. We are seeking: A Minister of Word and Sacrament to join us in growing God’s Kingdom. INDEX PAGE Vision, background and the Minister we seek 2 The Wakatipu Basin and Community 3 Our Church Centres 7 St Andrew’s - Queenstown 7 St John’s - Arrowtown 10 St Margaret’s - Frankton 14 Parish Overview 16 Governance 19 Membership Graphs 20 Financial Graphs 21 Wakatipu Church Groups 22 Ministry Team, Staff and support people 23 1 Vision, Background, and the Minister we seek Many years ago a friend of the church, now deceased, planted the seed of an idea to re-establish residential ministry in Arrowtown. -
Queenstown Lakes District Plan Review, Chapter 26: Historic Heritage
DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW CHAPTER 26: HISTORIC HERITAGE SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL 23 OCTOBER 2015 1. BACKGROUND TO IPENZ The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) is the lead national professional body representing the engineering profession in New Zealand. It has approximately 16,000 Members, and includes a cross-section of engineering students, practising engineers, and senior Members in positions of responsibility in business. IPENZ is non-aligned and seeks to contribute to the community in matters of national interest giving a learned view on important issues, independent of any commercial interest. As the lead engineering organisation in New Zealand, IPENZ has responsibility for advocating for the protection and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. IPENZ manages a Heritage Register and a Heritage Record for engineering items throughout New Zealand. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Register has criteria and thresholds similar to Category 1 historic places on Heritage New Zealand’s New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero. Items on our Register have been assessed as being engineering achievements of outstanding or special heritage significance. IPENZ is still populating the Register. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record includes histories of industrial and engineering items around New Zealand, and is also subject to ongoing improvements and additions. 2. GENERAL COMMENTS 2.1 INTRODUCTION The scheduling of heritage places in the District Plans of local authorities is an important mechanism that IPENZ supports because of our objective of promoting the protection, preservation and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. The Queenstown Lakes District has a very rich heritage and in particular has a wealth of industrial and engineering heritages sites because of the area’s early mining, agricultural and pastoral history and its challenging topography. -
Growing Plants in the Wakatipu
The Wakatipu Basin has some of the most unique and adaptive groups of plants found anywhere on the planet. Extensive modification of our landscape has seen these plants all but disappear from large parts of the basin. However, the importance of native species in New Zealand is being gradually recognised, and the importance of plants in the Wakatipu Basin is no exception. Many in the past have considered native plants slow growing and poorly adaptive, but the truth is the complete opposite. Native species found in the basin have had millions of years to adapt to its harsh, but beautiful terrain. It is important for anyone considering planting to determine what plants are right for this area so they can not only thrive, but help increase biodiversity values and bring back the native birds. This practical guide has been written to help anyone who is interested in planting native species within the Wakatipu Basin. It tells the story of the region, and explains how to best enhance one’s garden or patch of land. It includes helpful tips that will improve the success of any native plantings, particularly when considering sites encompassing the challenging micro-climates found throughout the district. It provides helpful advice to the first time gardener or the seasoned pro. It covers all aspects of planting, including maintenance advice and plant lists, so that even the most amateur gardener can soon have a thriving native patch filled with native bird song. Growing Native Plants in the Wakatipu Published by the Wakatipu Reforestation Trust (WRT) www.wrtqt.org.nz Email: [email protected] First Published 2017 The WRT has many volunteering ©Wakatipu Reforestation Trust 2017 opportunities. -
Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 - Agenda
Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 - Agenda Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 Meeting will be held in the Council Chamber, Level 2, Philip Laing House 144 Rattray Street, Dunedin Members: Cr Andrew Noone, Chairperson Cr Carmen Hope Cr Michael Laws, Deputy Chairperson Cr Gary Kelliher Cr Hilary Calvert Cr Kevin Malcolm Cr Michael Deaker Cr Gretchen Robertson Cr Alexa Forbes Cr Bryan Scott Hon Cr Marian Hobbs Cr Kate Wilson Senior Officer: Sarah Gardner, Chief Executive Meeting Support: Liz Spector, Committee Secretary 25 November 2020 01:00 PM Agenda Topic Page 1. APOLOGIES Cr Deaker and Cr Hobbs have submitted apologies. 2. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting. 3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. 4. PUBLIC FORUM Members of the public may request to speak to the Council. 4.1 Mr Bryce McKenzie has requested to speak to the Council about the proposed Freshwater Regulations. 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4 The Council will consider minutes of previous Council Meetings as a true and accurate record, with or without changes. 5.1 Minutes of the 28 October 2020 Council Meeting 4 6. ACTIONS (Status of Council Resolutions) 12 The Council will review outstanding resolutions. 7. MATTERS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 14 1 Council Meeting Agenda - 25 November 2020 - Agenda 7.1 CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO DRINKING WATER 14 This paper is provided to inform the Council on Otago Regional Council’s (ORC) current responsibilities in relation to drinking water. -
LWB Issue 759 Digital.Indd
36 LAKES WEEKLY JOBS INSIDE 14th Jul - 20th BULLETIN FIRST ON THE STREET No 759 WWW.LWB.CO.NZ • BUY • ACCOMMODATION • SELL • INFORMATION • JOBS • [email protected] Know it is us who are mad Driving around the Queenstown area is, and has been for a few years now, a complete disaster. I know its old news but it’s a cluster f—k and getting worse. We don’t need tourists from overseas to clog our streets, we do it all by ourselves. I counted, whilst dawdling in traffi c, (heading towards Shotover Country roundabout) 80 cars heading into Frankton before I saw one with two people in it, then 120 more before I saw three. All the rest were single drivers. I was also one. These all originate from Lake Hayes Estate, Shotover Country, Gibbston/ Cromwell and some other Wakatipu Basin traffi c. Digressing momentarily, those subdivisions should never have been allowed to go ahead before roads and bridges were prepared. The consultants were morons. The people deciding to give the go ahead were also morons and we should ask for our money back. Now we have winter and the usual traffi c issues and town congestion is The Gibbston Valley Cheesery & Deli pop-up opened last week. ridiculous. I have been, along with countless others, shouting out about this but Taste artisan cheeses, learn about cheese and wine pairings or no one is listening. Build more, more hotels, more fl ats, more apartments, more enjoy a good coffee and grab lunch from the deli shops, more people and on it goes. -
Wakatipu Trails Strategy
Wakatipu Trails Strategy Prepared for: Wakatipu Trails Trust Prepared by: Tourism Resource Consultants in association with Natural Solutions for Nature Ltd and Beca Carter Hollings and Ferner Ltd May 2004 Wakatipu Trails Strategy: TRC, May 2004 Page Table of Contents No. Executive Summary 2 Section 1. Introduction 7 Section 2. The Current Situation – Where Are We Now? 9 Section 3. A Vision for the Trails in the Wakatipu Basin 14 Section 4. Strategic Goals 15 Section 5. Priorities and Estimated Development Costs 29 Section 6A. Implementation Plan - Summary 33 Section 6B. Implementation Plan - Arterial Trails for 34 Walking and Cycling Section 6C. Implementation Plan - Recreational Trails 35 Section 6D. Implementation Plan – Management 36 Implications Appendix 1. Indicative Standards of the Wakatipu Trails 39 Network Appendix 2. Recreational User Requirements for the Rural 42 Road Network Appendix 3. Potential Public Access Network 46 1 1 Wakatipu Trails Strategy: TRC, May 2004 Executive The strategy was prepared to guide development of an integrated Summary network of walking and cycling trails and cycle-ways in the Wakatipu Basin. Preparation of the strategy was initiated by the Wakatipu Trails Trust in association with Transfund and Queenstown Lakes District Council. Funding was provided by Transfund and Council. The Department of Conservation and Otago Regional Council have also been key parties to the strategy. Vision The strategy’s vision – that of creating a world class trail and cycle network - is entirely appropriate given the scenic splendour, international profile and accessibility of the Wakatipu Basin. At its centre, Queenstown is New Zealand’s premier tourist destination. Well known for bungy jumping, rafting, skiing and jet boating, it has the informal status of being this country’s ‘adventure capital’. -
Queenstown and Surrounds (Wakatipu Area)
Community – Kea Project Plan Queenstown and Surrounds (Wakatipu area) Funded by: Department of Conservation – Community Fund (DOC-CF) Period: 1 December 2015 – 31 October 2017. Key contact person: Kea Conservation Trust – Tamsin Orr-Walker – [email protected]; Ph 0274249594 Aim The aim of the Community – Kea Project Plan is to i) facilitate long-term community kea conservation initiatives and ii) to change the way we think, act and live with kea in our communities. This will be actioned through development of collaborative Project Plans across the South Island. Each community plan will address concerns specific to the local community and threats to the resident kea population. Project Background This initial project plan outline has been developed as a result of discussions with communities during the Kea Conservation Trust’s (KCT) Winter Advocacy Tour - 20 July – 3 August 2015. The tour was funded by Dulux and supported by Department of Conservation (DOC). The tour theme, “Building a future with kea”, aimed to promote a new MOU between communities and kea. This initiative is in line with the new Strategic Plan for Kea Conservation (refer attached draft document), objective 3: to i) increase positive perceptions of kea and reduce conflict and ii) facilitate formation of community led kea conservation initiatives. Local Community – Kea Project Plans will be activated by two Community Engagement Coordinator’s (CEC’s) based in the following areas: 1) Upper half of the South Island: Northern region (Nelson/ Motueka/ Kahurangi), Central North (Nelson Lakes/ Murchison/Arthur’s Pass/Christchurch/Mt Hutt) and upper West Coast (Greymouth and Hokitika). -
Seasonal Climate Summary
New Zealand Climate Summary: Spring 2015 Issued: 4 December 2015 A dry spring for many parts of the country. Rainfall Rainfall was well below normal (< 50%) in Nelson and Marlborough, and below normal (50-79%) in eastern and inland parts of the South Island. In addition, southern, western, central and northern parts of the North Island received below normal rainfall. In contrast, rainfall was above normal (120-149%) or well above normal (> 149%) in Gisborne and Hawke’s Bay. Temperature Spring temperatures were near average (-0.50°C to + 0.50°C) for most of the country. The exception was parts of western Waikato, southern Hawke’s Bay, Wairarapa, the inland Canterbury Plains and Stewart Island where temperatures were below average (-1.20°C to -0.51°C). Soil moisture As of 1 December 2015, soil moisture levels were below normal for the time of year for extensive areas of New Zealand. In particular, soil moisture levels were much lower than normal in eastern and northern parts of the South Island, and southern, central, western and northern parts of the North Island. Soil moisture levels were above normal in Gisborne, southern Fiordland and Stewart Island. Sunshine Spring sunshine was abundant for southern, eastern, central and northern areas of the South Island, and parts of the central North Island, Bay of Plenty and Northland where sunshine totals were typically above normal (110-125%). Overview Spring 2015 saw strong El Niño conditions persist in the Tropical Pacific. Overall, the season was characterised by mean sea level pressures that were higher than normal over Australia and the Tasman Sea, while lower pressures than normal occurred to the south-east of New Zealand. -
Kelvin Peninsula // Jack's Point
KELVIN PENINSULA // JACK’S POINT Community Response Plan contents... Kelvin Peninsula / Kelvin Peninsula / Jack’s Point Area Map 3 Jack’s Point Evacuation Routes 18 Key Hazards 4 Earthquake 4 Plan Activation Process 19 Major Storms / Snowstorms 4 Civil Defence Centres 19 Wildfire 4 Roles and responsibilities 19 Landslide 5 Accident 5 Vulnerable Population Site 20 Household Emergency Plan 6 Kelvin Peninsula Tactical Sites Map 21 Emergency Survival Kit 7 Getaway Kit 7 Jack’s Point Stay in touch 7 Tactical Sites Map 22 Earthquake 8 Lakeside Estate Before and during an earthquake 8 & Wye Creek After an earthquake 9 Tactical Sites Map 23 Post disaster building management 9 Kelvin Peninsula Major Storms / Civil Defence Centres Map 24 Snowstorms 10 Before and when a warning is issued 10 After a storm, snowstorms 11 Jack’s Point Civil Defence Centres Map 25 Wildfires 12 Before and during 12 Visitor, Tourist and After a fire 13 Foreign National Welfare 26 Fire seasons 13 Emergency Contacts 27 Landslide 14 Before and during 14 After a landslide 15 For further information 28 Danger signs 15 Road Transport Crashes 16 Before, during and after 16 Truck crash zones maps 17 2 get ready... KELVIN PENINSULA / JACK’S POINT Area Map 6A KELVIN HEIGHTS JACK’S POINT 6 LAKESIDE ESTATE 3 get ready... THE KEY HAZARDS IN KELVIN PENINSULA & JACK’S POINT Earthquake // Major Storms // Snowstorms Wildfire // Landslide // Accident Earthquake New Zealand lies on the boundary of the Pacific and Australian tectonic plates. Most earthquakes occur at faults, which are breaks extending deep within the earth, caused by movements of these plates. -
Executive Summary | Ten Year Plan Submissions 2018-2028
Attachment D EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | TEN YEAR PLAN SUBMISSIONS 2018-2028 SUBMISSIONS BY WARD Arrowtown 13 Glenorchy 6 SUBMISSIONS Hawea 22 GRAND TOTAL Kingston 32 586 Luggate 4 Makarora 2 No Specific Ward 92 Queenstown Area 160 Wanaka Area 255 Question Responses Support Neutral Oppose 1A: Do you support the preferred option to complete the programme 35.04% 39.13% 25.83% outlined in the draft plan? QUEENSTOWN TOWN CENTRE MASTERPLAN 1B: Do you agree with the preferred funding model? 36.53% 36.27% 27.20% (FUNDING OPTIONS AND DELIVERY) 1C: If the funding assumptions are not supported (NZTA) do you agree 57.33% 31.36% 11.31% that Council re-prioritise some projects? 2A: Do you support the funding for a Council Office? 31.91% 37.19% 30.90% PROJECT CONNECT AND LIBRARIES 2B: Do you agree that this should include an interim dedicated 37.34% 38.36% 24.30% Queenstown library space? WANAKA 3A: Do you support the development of a Wanaka Masterplan in 2018 to enable 64.63% 27.32% 8.05% MASTERPLAN a strategic and well connected approach to Wanaka planning? 4A: Do you agree with the water supply project programme and timing to meet WATER (SUPPLY 56.22% 24.63% 19.15% AND QUALITY) the Drinking Water Standard (2008) by 2027/28? 5A: Do you agree that Council should introduce a general subsidy in order to protect 62.31% 23.37% 14.32% FUNDING SMALL the environment by supplementing the cost of smaller community schemes? COMMUNITIES’ WATER NEEDS 5B: Do you support the application of a tier two charge to the Arthurs Point (FUNDING OPTIONS) 36.34% 54.38% 9.28% Scheme -
Kawarau/Remarkables Conservation Area Historicheritage Values
Kawarau/Remarkables Conservation Area historic heritage values Cathryn Barr and Matthew Schmidt October 2020 Cover: Hut and sluicing’s Baileys Hill, Upper Nevis. Photo: Carl Walrond. Crown copyright 2020, New Zealand Department of Conservation In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. 2 Contents 1. Setting............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Heritage background ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2. Māori occupation and use of the valley .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Pakeha occupation and use .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Gold mining ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 3. Physical evidence of heritage sites............................................................................................................................. 14 4. Statements of heritage significance ........................................................................................................................... 16 4.1