DOCSLIB.ORG

Suppression Rather Than Visual Acuity Loss Limits Stereoacuity in Amblyopia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suppression Rather Than Visual Acuity Loss Limits Stereoacuity in Amblyopia Eye Movements, Strabismus, Amblyopia and Neuro-Ophthalmology Suppression Rather Than Visual Acuity Loss Limits Stereoacuity in Amblyopia Ann L. Webber,1 Katrina L. Schmid,1 Alex S. Baldwin,2 and Robert F. Hess2 1School of Optometry & Vision Sciences and Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia 2Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence: Ann L. Webber, PURPOSE. To investigate the influence of interocular suppression and visual acuity loss on School of Optometry & Vision stereoacuity in observers with and without abnormal vision development from strabismus Science and Institute of Health & or amblyopia. To determine whether stereoacuity improves in amblyopic observers when Biomedical Innovation, Queensland suppression is neutralized. University of Technology (QUT), 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, METHODS. Experiment 1: Visual acuity (VA), depth of suppression (contrast ratio Queensland, 4059 Australia; [CR]), and stereoacuity (digital random-dot) were tested in adult amblyopic observers [email protected]. (n = 21; age 27 ± 11 years). Experiment 2: VA, stereoacuity, and CR were measured Received: October 3, 2019 at baseline and through a series of monocular contrast attenuation and Bangerter filter Accepted: April 16, 2020 conditions that degrade visual input in participants with normal binocular vision (n = 19; Published: June 24, 2020 age 31 ± 13 years). Multiple regression models were used to determine relative contribu- tion of VA and CR to stereoacuity in both groups. Experiment 3: stereoacuity was retested Citation: Webber AL, Schmid KL, = Baldwin AS, Hess RF. Suppression in a subsample of amblyopic observers (n 7) after contrast reduction of the stimulus rather than visual acuity loss limits presented to dominant eye to neutralize suppression. stereoacuity in amblyopia. Invest RESULTS. In amblyopic observers, stereoacuity significantly correlated with CR Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(6):50. (P < 0.001), but not with interocular VA difference (P = 0.863). In participants with https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.6.50 normal vision development, stereoacuity, VA, and CR declined with introduction of monocular Bangerter filterP ( < 0.001), and stereoacuity reduced with monocular attenu- ation of stimulus contrast (P < 0.001). Reduction in stereoacuity correlated with both VA decrement and degraded CR. Stereoacuity significantly improved in amblyopic observers when the contrast to the dominant eye was adjusted based on the contrast ratio. CONCLUSIONS. Suppression rather than visual acuity loss limits stereoacuity in observers with abnormal vision development. Stereopsis can be improved when interocular sensory dominance is neutralized. Keywords: stereopsis, suppression, stereoacuity, amblyopia, visual acuity mblyopia is a developmental disorder of the visual or lens anomalies, with both blur and contrast differences A system in the brain. In most cases, patients suffering known to degrade stereoacuity.10 Stereoacuity also requires from amblyopia will have reduced visual acuity in one eye. accurate ocular alignment so that the dichoptic images stim- There is a degree to which the brain suppresses (or ignores) ulate corresponding retinal areas for the perception of fused the visual signal from that eye. This typically results in single vision.2 reduced or absent stereopsis (binocular depth perception). Nonconcordance of retinal images from ocular media Stereopsis, the ability to perceive the depth of an object obstruction, high anisometropic refractive error or strabis- relative to an observer, arises from the binocular sensory mus early in life will interrupt the neurodevelopment of the fusion of slightly dissimilar retinal images that have hori- visual system and cause amblyopia.11 Patients with ambly- zontal disparity by virtue of the lateral separation of the opia may have nonrecoverable reduced visual acuity, may two eyes.1,2 Stereoacuity, reported in minutes or seconds of suppress or ignore the visual signal from one eye and are arc, describes the smallest horizontal disparity in binocular likely to have reduced or absent stereopsis (binocular depth images that leads to the perception of depth in the observed vision).12–15 In addition to visual acuity and stereoacuity loss, stimulus. In observers with equal normal visual acuity and amblyopia results in impaired position discrimination and normal vision development, stereoacuity thresholds are typi- contrast sensitivity11 and, furthermore, may be associated cally of 20 to 40 seconds of arc.2–4 Stereoacuity will be with higher order functional and processing impairments worse when there are significant differences in the retinal that suggest visual neurodevelopmental retardation beyond images between eyes, that is, if the dichoptic images differ the primary visual cortex.16–18 in contrast, size, or clarity.5–9 Differences in retinal image Interocular suppression of visual information from the clarity and size can occur if there is unequal refractive error amblyopic eye is frequently reported in amblyopia,13,19 (anisometropia) or ocular media obstruction from corneal presumably to compensate for conflicting visual input.20 As Copyright 2020 The Authors iovs.arvojournals.org | ISSN: 1552-5783 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Downloaded from iovs.arvojournals.org on 09/29/2021 Suppression Limits Stereoacuity in Amblyopia IOVS | June 2020 | Vol. 61 | No. 6 | Article 50 | 2 well as limiting stereopsis by preventing sensory fusion,21 simulation of the monocular acuity loss) should be more the role that suppression plays in causing or limiting ambly- correlated with stereoacuity than with monocular contrast opia recovery is yet to be fully determined. Novel treat- attenuation (our simulation of the interocular suppressive ments for amblyopia are aimed at reducing suppression of imbalance). In the case that stereopsis is more affected the amblyopic visual pathway to improve binocularity22–25; by the binocular suppressive imbalance, then the reverse however, the relative contribution of interocular differences would be the case; stereoacuity would be more impacted in visual acuity and depth of suppression in determin- by the interocular contrast difference. Finally, stereoacuity ing the limit of stereoacuity is unclear. For example, it was retested in a subset of amblyopic participants with has been believed for some time that amblyopia (reduced the contrast of the stimulus presented to the dominant acuity in one eye) is the primary problem and loss of eye reduced, proportional to the determined interocular binocularity, the consequence. However, more recently it dominance, to counter suppression. For amblyopic partic- has been suggested that it is the other way around13,26,27; ipants the prediction was that if stereopsis were limited loss of binocularity is the primary problem and amblyopia mainly by suppression, then by neutralizing suppression the consequence. According to the former explanation one by altering the contrast, stereoacuity would be expected to would expect an inverse relationship between suppression improve. and acuity loss; the more amblyopic the eye, the less it This study had three aims: (1) to determine the rela- needs to be suppressed to ensure it does not interfere in tive strength of association between reduced visual acuity, binocular vision. On the other hand, the latter explanation the depth of suppression (contrast balance) and the would assume a direct relationship, whereby the greater the stereoacuity in observers with abnormal binocular vision suppression the greater the resultant amblyopia. A number development (this directly bears on the etiology), (2) of studies have shown that there is a direct relationship to determine the relative contribution of induced visual between suppression and acuity loss in amblyopia.4,15 Quite acuity or interocular dominance deficits to stereoacuity apart from these interrelationships in amblyopia, it would be loss when vision is monocularly impaired in observers of value to know the extent to which sensory eye dominance with normal vision development, and (3) to determine and stereopsis are correlated in the normal binocular popu- whether stereoacuity improves in amblyopic observers when lation and the extent to which degraded monocular input interocular dominance balance is altered to neutralize affects ocular sensory dominance and stereopsis. suppression. In this study we seek to make a distinction between simulations of acuity-like losses and suppressive-like losses. From what we know about the contrast sensitivity deficit in METHODS amblyopia,28–30 the higher the spatial frequency, the greater Participants the loss. It is like a lowpass filtering, and the resultant loss in acuity would be simulated by an increased slope of the Adult participants were prospectively recruited for a study of amplitude spectrum. We use the Bangerter filters in normal binocular vision perception. All had a comprehensive vision participants to simulate the amblyopic loss.31,32 Suppression and intraocular health exam (previous treatment history, affects low as well as high spatial frequencies33 and is best visual acuity (electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Study simulated by a vertical translation of the 1/f amplitude spec- e-ETDRS and near logMAR), clinical stereoacuity (Randot trum line. It is the standard metric used to quantify suppres-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management of Microtropia
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.58.3.281 on 1 March 1974. Downloaded from Brit. J. Ophthal. (I974) 58, 28 I Management of microtropia J. LANG Zirich, Switzerland Microtropia or microstrabismus may be briefly described as a manifest strabismus of less than 50 with harmonious anomalous correspondence. Three forms can be distinguished: primary constant, primary decompensating, and secondary. There are three situations in which the ophthalmologist may be confronted with micro- tropia: (i) Amblyopia without strabismus; (2) Hereditary and familial strabismus; (3) Residual strabismus after surgery. This may be called secondary microtropia, for everyone will admit that in most cases of convergent strabismus perfect parallelism and bifoveal fixation are not achieved even after expert treatment. Microtropia and similar conditions were not mentioned by such well-known early copyright. practitioners as Javal, Worth, Duane, and Bielschowsky. The views of Maddox (i898), that very small angles were extremely rare, and that the natural tendency to fusion was much too strong to allow small angles to exist, appear to be typical. The first to mention small residual angles was Pugh (I936), who wrote: "A patient with monocular squint who has been trained to have equal vision in each eye and full stereoscopic vision with good amplitude of fusion may in 3 months relapse into a slight deviation http://bjo.bmj.com/ in the weaker eye and the vision retrogresses". Similar observations of small residual angles have been made by Swan, Kirschberg, Jampolsky, Gittoes-Davis, Cashell, Lyle, Broadman, and Gortz. There has been much discussion in both the British Orthoptic Journal and the American Orthoptic journal on the cause of this condition and ways of avoiding it.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Vith Nerve Palsy-Avoiding Unnecessary Surgery
    MANAGEMENT OF VITH NERVE PALSY-AVOIDING UNNECESSARY SURGERY P. RIORDAN-E VA and J. P. LEE London SUMMARY for unrecovered VIth nerve palsy must involve a trans­ Unresolved Vlth nerve palsy that is not adequately con­ position procedure3.4. The availability of botulinum toxin trolled by an abnormal head posture or prisms can be to overcome the contracture of the ipsilateral medial rectus 5 very suitably treated by surgery. It is however essential to now allows for full tendon transplantation techniques -7, differentiate partially recovered palsies, which are with the potential for greatly increased improvements in amenable to horizontal rectus surgery, from unrecovered final fields of binocular single vision, and deferment of palsies, which must be treated initially by a vertical any necessary surgery to the medial recti, which is also muscle transposition procedure. Botulinum toxin is a likely to improve the final outcome. valuable tool in making this distinction. It also facilitates This study provides definite evidence, from a large full tendon transposition in unrecovered palsies, which series of patients, of the potential functional outcome from appears to produce the best functional outcome of all the the surgical treatment of unresolved VIth nerve palsy, transposition procedures, with a reduction in the need for together with clear guidance as to the forms of surgery that further surgery. A study of the surgical management of 12 should be undertaken in specific cases. The fundamental patients with partially recovered Vlth nerve palsy and 59 role of botulinum toxin in establishing the degree of lateral patients with unrecovered palsy provides clear guidelines rectus function and hence the correct choice of initial sur­ on how to attain a successful functional outcome with the gery, and as an adjunct to transposition surgery for unre­ minimum amount of surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppression and Retinal Correspondence in Intermittent Exotropia
    Downloaded from bjo.bmj.com on May 23, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1986, 70, 673-676 Suppression and retinal correspondence in intermittent exotropia JEFFREY COOPER AND CAROL DIBBLE RECORD From the Institute of Vision Research, SUNYIState College of Optometry, 100 East 24th Street, New York, New York 10010, USA SUMMARY Suppression scotomas and retinal projection (retinal correspondence) were measured in six intermittent exotropes during deviation. Measurements used red-green anaglyph stimuli presented on a black background which could be varied from 3-4 minutes of arc to 3024'. Results showed non-suppression of all points between the fovea and the diplopia point. Harmonious anomalous retinal correspondence was usually observed. Two subjects had spontaneous changes from anomalous retinal correspondence to normal retinal correspondence without a concurrent change in ocular position. Conventional testing resulted in more variable results in regard to retinal correspondence and suppression, suggesting that non-suppression and anomalous retinal corres- pondence occur when black backgrounds are used for testing. Patients with intermittent exotropia of the diverg- image and anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) ence excess type (DE) or basic exotropia usually do in the deviated position and normal retinal corres- not complain of diplopia when their eyes are deviat- pondence (NRC) in the aligned position on the ing.' Parks2 believes that the absence of diplopia is Hering-Bielschowsky afterimage test.' due to a dense temporal hemiretinal suppression. We therefore attempted to qualify the depth of Using a technique employing Risley prisms, suppression in deviating intermittent exotropes while Jampolsky3 demonstrated that DE patients have a monitoring ocular position.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociated Horizontal Deviation: Clinical Spectrum, Pathogenesis
    DISSOCIATED HORIZONTAL DEVIATION: CLINICAL SPECTRUM, PATHOGENESIS, EVOLUTIONARY UNDERPINNINGS, DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, AND POTENTIAL ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFANTILE ESOTROPIA (AN AMERICAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THESIS) BY Michael C. Brodsky MD ABSTRACT Purpose: To elucidate the pathophysiology of dissociated horizontal deviation. Methods: The reversed fixation test was performed prospectively in 28 patients who developed consecutive exotropia following horizontal extraocular muscle surgery for infantile esotropia. All patients were assessed for the presence of adduction weakness, latent nystagmus, dissociated vertical divergence, and neurologic disease. Results: A positive reversed fixation test, indicating the presence of dissociated horizontal deviation, was found in 14 of 28 patients (50%) with consecutive exotropia. In patients with dissociated horizontal deviation, the exodeviation was usually smaller with the nonpreferred eye fixating than with the preferred eye fixating, and smaller with the preferred eye fixating than during periods of visual inattention or under general anesthesia. Dissociated horizontal deviation correlated with the findings of dissociated vertical divergence, but not with asymmetric adduction weakness, latent nystagmus, or neurologic disease. Conclusions: Using reversed fixation testing, dissociated horizontal deviation can be detected in 50% of patients who develop consecutive exotropia following surgery for infantile esotropia. In this setting, monocular fixation with either eye superimposes a dissociated esotonus upon a baseline exodeviation. Fixation with the nonpreferred eye usually exerts greater esotonus than fixation with the preferred eye, producing an asymmetrical exodeviation during prism and alternate cover testing. Depending on the baseline anatomical position of the eyes, this dissociated esotonus can manifest as an intermittent exodeviation or an intermittent esodeviation. This unrecognized form of ocular motor dissociation may contribute to the pathogenesis of infantile esotropia.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering Stereo Vision by Squashing Virtual Bugs in a Virtual Reality Rstb.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Environment
    Recovering stereo vision by squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org environment Indu Vedamurthy1,†, David C. Knill1, Samuel J. Huang1,†, Amanda Yung1, 4 1,3,† 1,2 4 Research Jian Ding , Oh-Sang Kwon , Daphne Bavelier and Dennis M. Levi 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, Cite this article: Vedamurthy I, Knill DC, NY 14627-0268, USA 2 Huang SJ, Yung A, Ding J, Kwon O-S, Bavelier Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland 3School of Design and Human Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 689-798, South Korea D, Levi DM. 2016 Recovering stereo vision by 4School of Optometry and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality DML, 0000-0002-5350-8639 environment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371: 20150264. Stereopsis is the rich impression of three-dimensionality, based on binocular http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0264 disparity—the differences between the two retinal images of the same world. However, a substantial proportion of the population is stereo-deficient, and Accepted: 9 March 2016 relies mostly on monocular cues to judge the relative depth or distance of objects in the environment. Here we trained adults who were stereo blind or stereo- deficient owing to strabismus and/or amblyopia in a natural visuomotor One contribution of 15 to a theme issue task—a ‘bug squashing’ game—in a virtual reality environment. The subjects’ ‘Vision in our three-dimensional world’.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiology of Suppression in Strabismic Amblyopia
    British Journal of Ophthalmology 1996; 80: 373-377 373 PERSPECTIVE Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.80.4.373 on 1 April 1996. Downloaded from Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia Richard Harrad, Frank Sengpiel, Colin Blakemore It is 100 years since von Graefe first demonstrated a binocular inhibitory process has been found to be present suppression scotoma in an amblyopic eye.' A review of in some amblyopic subjects'9 and the work of Harrad and publications on the subject of suppression in strabismus Hess has shown that, in the presence of reduced contrast reveals that this has not been a very active area of research sensitivity in the amblyopic eye, it can at least partly and that what literature there is contains many apparent account for suppression in some subjects with small angle contradictions. strabismus or anisometropic amblyopia,7 15 as well as for Early workers found strong suppression at the fovea of reduced stereoacuity in these patients.20 the deviating eye in strabismic amblyopia (the point of The loss of low contrast information as a result of confusion) and also at the diplopic point (the point on the dichoptic masking is similar to the process whereby a pro- retina of the deviating eye where the image of the target gressive reduction of the contrast of one of a pair of stereo being fixated by the other eye falls).23 They made no half images leads to a decrease in stereoacuity21 22 and attempt to describe the fate of images of objects in the rest eventually suppression of the lower contrast half image in of the visual field of the deviating eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Treatment of Intermittent Central Suppression Improves Quality-Of-Life Measures
    Optometry (2012) 83, 19-26 Remote treatment of intermittent central suppression improves quality-of-life measures Eric S. Hussey, O.D. Private Practice, Spokane, Washington. KEYWORDS Abstract Dyslexia; BACKGROUND: Intermittent central suppression (ICS) is a repetitive intermittent (‘‘on-and-off’’) loss Electronic rapid alternate of central visual sensation without strabismus or amblyopia. These repetitive seconds-long suppres- occlusion; sions have been suggested to create visual confusion and instability that would cause vision symptoms, Intermittent central contribute to reading complaints, and even impair reading. suppression; METHODS: Teacher-identified Job Corps students were diagnosed with ICS and then treated with 5-Hz Quality of life; electronic liquid crystal shutter alternate occlusion. Suppression; RESULTS: Twenty-six young adult students (19.7 6 1.6 y) had their ICS treated over 5.9 6 3.7 months. Tests of Adult Basic Suppression periods decreased in length (P , 0.0001) and ‘‘binocular’’ nonsuppressed periods increased Education in length (P , 0.0001). Overall, College of Optometrists in Vision Development (COVD) quality-of-life (QOL) scores improved (P , 0.0001), 16 reading behavior COVD QOL questions improved (P , 0.0001), and individual QOL questions improved. Posttherapy reading scores (N 5 18) improved 3.7 (6 2.6) years (P , 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treating ICS with electronic alternate occlusion reduced suppression periods, in- creased binocular periods, and improved symptoms as measured in the COVD QOL questionnaire. Pos- itive changes also occurred in reading scores. These data suggest ICS should be considered a probable cause for symptoms of reading problems. Optometry 2012;83:19-26 Treatment of the visual sensory defect of suppression has suppression in the 1950s.1,2 Most of the early thought on sup- been part of optometric vision therapy since its beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppression in Strabismus an Update
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.68.3.174 on 1 March 1984. Downloaded from British Journal ofOphthalmology, 1984, 68, 174-178 Suppression in strabismus an update J. A. PRATT-JOHNSON AND G. TILLSON From the Department ofOphthalmology, University ofBritish Columbia, Vancouver, and the Department ofOphthalmology, Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada SUMMARY Previous reports have described suppression scotomas, suppression varying with the type of strabismus and suppression confined to one halfofthe retina (hemiretinal suppression). Our findings show that suppression in all varieties of strabismus, with the exception of the monofixation syndrome, involves the whole of the visual field of the deviating eye except for its monocular temporal crescent. In the monofixation syndrome our findings show a small central suppression scotoma involving the fovea but leaving the rest ofthe visual field of the deviating eye unsuppressed. We could find no evidence to support the concept of hemiretinal suppression but found evidence to support the presence of a trigger mechanism for suppression which operates on a hemiretinal basis. The sensory adaptations of suppression, anomalous demonstrate the presence of a trigger mechanism for retinal correspondence (ARC), and amblyopia which suppression. As a result of our experiments we have occur in strabismus with onset during visual been able to look again at the literature on immaturity have been extensively studied by a variety suppression and realise the differences between our ofmethods. The investigation of all these adaptations findings and those of previous researchers result from has been limited by the difficulty of providing test the various testing methods used. A detailed situations which are close to the patient's normal description of the methods we used to explore and http://bjo.bmj.com/ seeing conditions and yet allow the function of each map the binocular field of vision in strabismic and eye, individually, to be assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Persistent Diplopia in Visually Mature Patients
    Persistent Diplopia in treatment that either establishes fusion or Visually Mature Patients. reactivates a preexisting sensory adaptation. This case series reviews these other causes of Is it Intractable or diplopia. something else? A Review and Case Series INTRODUCTION Robert P. Rutstein, OD, MS, FAAO Diplopia is the condition in which a single Professor Emeritus School of image is perceived simultaneously as being two Optometry, University of Alabama rather than one.1 When on examination there is at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama inability to fuse the two images and also suppress the second image, the diplopia is intractable.2,3 Intractable diplopia is constant and occurs in all ARTICLE positions of gaze despite achieving satisfactory ocular alignment with either prisms, lenses, ABSTRACT vision therapy, extraocular muscle surgery, or Diplopia is described as being intractable when botulinum toxin injection. Some patients may there is inability to both fuse the two images actively avoid fusion by performing involuntary and suppress the second image. Intractable ocular movements of their nonfixating eye, diplopia persists despite achieving ocular reporting one image jumping over the other alignment using either prisms, lenses,vision when the strabismus is neutralized either with therapy,extraocular muscle surgery, or botul- prisms or with haploscopic devices such as the inum toxin injection. Treatment usually synoptophore.4-6 resorts to occluding or fogging the patient’s Since fusion cannot be established, nondominant eye. Often times, however, treatment for intractable diplopia is usually adults having other causative mechanisms palliative. Occlusion or fogging of the for supposedly persistent diplopia are able nondominant eye with patches,3 frosted to achieve comfortable single vision with spectacle lenses,7 partially occlusive filters,8,9 monovision glasses or monovision contact 10,11 3,7,12 Correspondence regarding this article should be lenses, occlusive contact lenses, corneal emailed to Robert P.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomalous Retinal Correspondence (ARC)  Monofixation Syndrome
    1 Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus Hol up…Before we start talking about sensory adaptations to strabismus, let’s review the basic principles of binocular vision 2 Q Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? 3 Q Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when… 4 A Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when…different images are projected onto corresponding retinal areas (We’ll unpack the notion of ‘corresponding retinal areas’ shortly) 5 Q Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when…different images are projected onto corresponding retinal areas Visual confusion produces the visual impression of… 6 A Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when…different images are projected onto corresponding retinal areas Visual confusion produces the visual impression of… two objects occupying a single location in visual space 7 Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus (Eyes esodeviated) Fovea Fovea These misaligned eyes are foveating different objects, and thus each is projecting a different image to the visual cortex as being the object of regard. 8 Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus (Eyes esodeviated) Fovea Fovea These misaligned eyes are foveating different objects, and thus each is projecting a different image to the visual cortex as being the object of regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of the Patient with Strabismus: Esotropia and Exotropia
    OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE OPTOMETRY: THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 36,000 full-time equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 6,500 communities Care of the Patient with across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care providers in more than 3,500 communities. Strabismus: The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all Esotropia and of which enhance the quality of life. Exotropia OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH STRABISMUS: ESOTROPIA AND EXOTROPIA Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Strabismus: Robert P. Rutstein, O.D., Principal Author Martin S. Cogen, M.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. Rochelle L. Mozlin, O.D. Julie M. Ryan, O.D. Edited by: Robert P. Rutstein, O.D., M.S. Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A. Heath, O.D., Ed.M., Chair NOTE: Clinicians should not rely on the Clinical Diane T.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t41w7tf Journal Vision research, 114 ISSN 0042-6989 Authors Levi, Dennis M Knill, David C Bavelier, Daphne Publication Date 2015-09-01 DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.002 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Vision Research Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: VR-14-396R1 Title: Stereopsis and Amblyopia: A Mini-Review. Article Type: SI: Amblyopia Keywords: Amblyopia; stereopsis; perceptual learning; videogames; strabismus; anisometropia Corresponding Author: Dr. Dennis M. Levi, Corresponding Author's Institution: University of California First Author: Dennis M. Levi Order of Authors: Dennis M. Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier Cover Letter UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ DENNIS M. LEVI, O.D., PH. D. SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY DEAN BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720-2020 November 20, 2014 Dear Paul, We are submitting the revised Mini-Review, invited by Susana Chung, entitled: “Stereopsis and Amblyopia: A Mini-Review” by Dave Knill, Daphne Bavelier and myself for consideration for publication in the Special Issue of Vision Research on Amblyopia. We thank you and the reviewers for the insightful and constructive comments, and we have tried to address them all in the “Response to Reviews”. The aim of this mini-review is to provide a review of what is known about stereopsis and its recovery in amblyopia. Our review suggests that impaired stereoscopic depth perception is the most common deficit associated with amblyopia under ordinary (binocular) viewing conditions, and that this impairment may have a substantial impact on visuomotor tasks, difficulties in playing sports in children and locomoting safely in older adults.
    [Show full text]