Lovestone • the AFL-CIO .1-Fas Its Own CIA Dan Kurzman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lovestone • the AFL-CIO .1-Fas Its Own CIA Dan Kurzman What Did Happen in Dallas? Alex Campbell CDC THE NEW lune 25, 1966, 35 cents REPUBLIC Lovestone • The AFL-CIO .1-fas Its Own CIA Dan Kurzman Which GOP? -- gerald 1-V, Johnson Poor Politics —Andrew Kopkind Bill Mo-yers James T3eakin Grocery Studies —James Ridgeway Kennedys at Home — .714artin T. Nolan BOOKS AND THE ARTS a quorum or something." Commission What Did ilappen in Dallas? hearings began at 9 a.m. so Chief Jus- by Alex Campbell tice Warren could officially open them before leaving for the Court at to a.m. The Commission averaged only seven Americans who go abroad are startled killed . and Governor Connally was hearings a month; only one was open that many foreigners remain deeply wounded." to the public. The to months' investiga- skeptical of the official version of the Weisberg and Epstein have independ- tion really boiled down to to weeks. assassination of President John F. Ken- ently ransacked the z6 volumes of testi- The staff lawyers were especially mad nedy. The Americans can't understand mony and exhibits and the two FBI re- about the Commission's genteel han- it; didn't the Warren Commission's ports on which the Warren Report is dling of Marina Oswald. Norman Red- Report close the case? As a matter of based; additionally, Epstein interviewed lich complained that Mrs. Oswald "lied fact, no; the Report was careful to say members of the Commission and its to the Secret Service, the FBI and this that "because of the difficulty of prov- staff, in pursuit of his master's thesis Commission repeatedly on matters ing negatives to a certainty the pos- on government at Cornell University. which are of vital concern to the people He evoked some staggering admissions. of this country and the world," but the Whitewash The Commission seems to have done its Chief Justice declared himself "a judge by Harold Weisberg job in an atmosphere of internal mud- of human beings" and had faith in her. (Weisberg; $4.95) dle and wrangling. The assistant coun- The staff lawyers derisively 'called her sel were deeply unhappy about the Re- the seven Commissioners' Snow White. Inquest port and tried hard to have it written A tenth of the hearings was devoted to by Edward Jay Epstein differently. They felt they knew far her testimony, but Epstein concludes (Viking; $3) more about the case than the seven the discrepancies in it "were never sat- Commissioners did. Epstein says "the isfactorily resolved." sibility of others being involved with entire task of ascertaining the basic The single most astounding thing that either Oswald or Ruby cannot be estab- facts of the assassination fell upon one both Epstein and Weisberg fasten on lished categorically." lawyer — Arlen Specter." Wesley J. after brooding over the z6 volumes of That greatly understates the areas of Liebeler told Epstein most of the Com- testimony has nothing to do with Ma- fuzz. In an article in The New Republic missioners were absent most of the rina, however. The Commission never on December 21, 1963, called "Seeds of time, that they would stop by the hear- saw the photographs and X-rays of Doubt," Jack Minnis and Staughton ings "a few minutes," ask a question Kennedy's body which were made at Lynd wondered how a shot fired from which "blew the lawyer's entire line of the autopsy as a matter of routine in a behind could have wounded Kennedy questioning," then rush out "to make case of violent death. These were in the front of his neck, how three shots could fire what seemed to be at least four bullets, and how a bolt-action rifle, subsequently ascertained to have The Amoeba a defective telescopic sight, could fire off three accurate shots in five-and-a- Mindless, meaning no harm, half seconds. Substantially the same it ingested me. questions still lacked satisfactory an- It moved on silent pseudopods swers when the Warren Report ap- to where I was born, inert, and I peared September 28, 1964, and still do. was inside. There were over zoo eye-witnesses of Digestive acids burned my skin. the assassination, including trained ob- Enzymes nuzzled knees and eyes. servers — FBI, Secret Service and police; My ego like a conjugated verb movie- and still-cameras recorded the retained its root, a narrow fear event; the Warren Commission in- of being qualified. vestigated for to months. Yet Harold Weisberg isn't far wrong when he Alas, suffixes swarmed. writes: "There is no single thing that is I lost my mother's arms, my teeth, proved beyond reasonable doubt about my laugh, my protruding faith; the marksman, the rifle, the ammuni- Reduced to the 0 of a final sigh, tion, the shooting or the number of in time I died. shots, except that the President was JOHN UPDIKE THE NEW REPUBLIC handed over to the Secret Service. In- "To say that they were hit by separate stead of seeing them, the Commission Does the bullets is synonymous with saying that had to make do with an "artist's con- there were two assassins." rfmeiricao ception." Even this odd procedure Epstein and Weisberg are concerned Tete.teued mightn't have raised questions, since with such unresolved mysteries as the the Commission had a written autopsy number of shots fired at Kennedy and eastorittee report and listened to the man who Connally, where the shots came from, speak for you? signed it, Commander James J. Humes, Oswald's abilities as a marksman, the Navy pathologist. But the autopsy Oswald's connections, if any, with the report and the "artist's conception" FBI and CIA. Both are concerned also maintain that a downward-travelling with the Commission's arbitrary way bullet that entered the back of the with witnesses — it seemed to pay most President's neck came out the front of attention to the ones it wanted to be- his throat, lower than the entry wound, lieve, and when it suited its book it was and this is flatly contradicted by a chart attentive to witnesses whose testimony of the body prepared by Humes himself it otherwise brushed aside. Mrs. Eric during the autopsy; by the FBI's report Walther and Arnold Rowland claimed on the President's wounds; by the they saw a second assassin and were actual bullet-holes in Kennedy's jacket passed over; much more weight was If You Are a War Veteran and shirt; by Secret Service man Clint given the eye-witness testimony of ... and loin civil rights marches, Hill who attended the autopsy; and by Howard L. Brennan, the only person ... support the United Nations. Secret Service man Glen A. Bennett, claiming to identify Oswald as Ken- ... want the fullest realization of the Great Society ... who saw a bullet hit the President's nedy's assassin, though Brennan's testi- back (not neck) and to whose account mony contained one major error of fact AVC DOES SPEAK FOR YOU! the Warren Report claimed it gave and he admitted to the Commission "substantial weight." All of this con- that he had lied to the police. If you want an effective force on the American scene . trary evidence plainly indicates a back Weisberg notes that the killing of to watchdog the military-industrial wound six inches below Kennedy's Patrolman J. D. Tippit also raised ques- complex Pres. Eisenhower warned neckline and made by a bullet that tions about the number of shots fired. about. couldn't possibly have exited from the The Warren Report didn't include an ... to keep tabs on military justice. ... to denounce use of the draft to front of the President's throat unless autopsy report on Tippit but said his silence dissent, it was travelling up and not down. body contained four bullets; however, to counteract right-wing influences of the exhibits include a Dallas police case old-line veterans and military groups ... THEN Weisberg points out that the Report report that Tippit was shot three times, showed absolutely no curiosity about "one time each in the hand, chest and Support Your Organization those glaring contradictions. Epstein stomach." The Warren Report said that The Liberal Veterans' Voice notes the Commission queried the FBI "five shots may have been fired even about some parts of its report, but though only four bullets were recov- e asked no questions about the FBI's ver- ered" from Tippit's body. The Report "Citizens First. Veterans Second" sion of the autopsy findings. had to account somehow for a discrep- Clip and mail. The FBI said medical examination of ancy between those bullets and the the President's body showed that the cartridge cases witnesses said they saw bullet that hit him in the back pene- the killer discarding. American Veterans Committee trated "less than a finger length." The 1830 Jefferson Place. N.W. FBI implied this was the bullet found The was still investigating the Washington. D. C. 20036 FBI I want to amplify AVC's voice. on a stretcher in the Dallas hospital. assassination when the Warren Report D Please enroll me as a member of But the Commission had another use went to press. On September 16, 1964, AVC. $10 dues enclosed. for this bullet. It said it cane out the the finally tracked down, in Cali- want to AVC's FBI work. front of Kennedy's throat and then in- fornia, a witness who was able to tell (Make checks payable to American flicted all Connally's wounds. Accord- them about a man who closely re- Veterans Committee. Dues and con. ing to the Report "there is very per- tributions are tax-deductible.) sembled Oswald, called himself "Leon suasive evidence from the experts" Oswald," was in Dallas about the time that this is what happened.
Recommended publications
  • The Commune Movement During the 1960S and the 1970S in Britain, Denmark and The
    The Commune Movement during the 1960s and the 1970s in Britain, Denmark and the United States Sangdon Lee Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2016 i The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement ⓒ 2016 The University of Leeds and Sangdon Lee The right of Sangdon Lee to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ii Abstract The communal revival that began in the mid-1960s developed into a new mode of activism, ‘communal activism’ or the ‘commune movement’, forming its own politics, lifestyle and ideology. Communal activism spread and flourished until the mid-1970s in many parts of the world. To analyse this global phenomenon, this thesis explores the similarities and differences between the commune movements of Denmark, UK and the US. By examining the motivations for the communal revival, links with 1960s radicalism, communes’ praxis and outward-facing activities, and the crisis within the commune movement and responses to it, this thesis places communal activism within the context of wider social movements for social change. Challenging existing interpretations which have understood the communal revival as an alternative living experiment to the nuclear family, or as a smaller part of the counter-culture, this thesis argues that the commune participants created varied and new experiments for a total revolution against the prevailing social order and its dominant values and institutions, including the patriarchal family and capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Injustice
    Fighting Injustice by Michael E. Tigar Copyright © 2001 by Michael E. Tigar All rights reserved CONTENTS Introduction 000 Prologue It Doesn’t Get Any Better Than This 000 Chapter 1 The Sense of Injustice 000 Chapter 2 What Law School Was About 000 Chapter 3 Washington – Unemployment Compensation 000 Chapter 4 Civil Wrongs 000 Chapter 5 Divisive War -- Prelude 000 Chapter 6 Divisive War – Draft Board Days and Nights 000 Chapter 7 Military Justice Is to Justice . 000 Chapter 8 Chicago Blues 000 Chapter 9 Like A Bird On A Wire 000 Chapter 10 By Any Means Necessary 000 Chapter 11 Speech Plus 000 Chapter 12 Death – And That’s Final 000 Chapter 13 Politics – Not As Usual 000 Chapter 14 Looking Forward -- Changing Direction 000 Appendix Chronology 000 Afterword 000 SENSING INJUSTICE, DRAFT OF 7/11/13, PAGE 2 Introduction This is a memoir of sorts. So I had best make one thing clear. I am going to recount events differently than you may remember them. I will reach into the stream of memory and pull out this or that pebble that has been cast there by my fate. The pebbles when cast may have had jagged edges, now worn away by the stream. So I tell it as memory permits, and maybe not entirely as it was. This could be called lying, but more charitably it is simply what life gives to each of us as our memories of events are shaped in ways that give us smiles and help us to go on. I do not have transcripts of all the cases in the book, so I recall them as well as I can.
    [Show full text]
  • Upending the “Racial Death-Wish”: Black Gay Liberation and the Culture of Black Homophobia
    UPENDING THE “RACIAL DEATH-WISH”: BLACK GAY LIBERATION AND THE CULTURE OF BLACK HOMOPHOBIA A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History by Kailyn Pope June 2021 © 2021 Kailyn Pope ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Upending the “Racial Death-Wish”: Black Gay Liberation and the Culture of Black Homophobia AUTHOR: Kailyn Pope DATE SUBMITTED: June 2021 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Andrew Morris, Ph.D. Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Cairns, Ph.D. Lecturer Emeritus of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Thomas Trice, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History iii ABSTRACT Upending the “Racial Death-Wish”: Black Gay Liberation and the Culture of Black Homophobia Kailyn Pope This thesis analyzes the origin and impact of Black homophobia found in activist spaces of mid- to late-twentieth-century American society. Black gay Americans were subjected to intersecting forms of systemic and cultural oppression that were exceedingly hard to escape due to both the homophobia in Black spaces and the racism in gay spaces. Black gay activists and artists thus had to create their own avenues of expression where they and others could fully embrace what it meant to be Black and gay. This work utilizes a Black feminist framework to explore the roots of Black homophobia and how this type of bigotry was able to so deeply infiltrate Black activist spaces like the Civil Rights Movement and the Black Panther Party. Black homophobia originated as a response to White supremacist domination of the Black body, and was able to spread through the community for generations through paths such as hypermasculinity, the Black church, and misogynoir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way the Wind Blew a History of the Weather Underground
    The Way The Wind Blew A History Of The Weather Underground Author: Ron Jacobs Publisher: Verso Date: 1997 ISBN: 1-85984-167-8 Table of Contents Preface....................................................................................................................1 1. 1968: SDS Turns Left...........................................................................................3 2. Weather Dawns: The Break and the Statement .................................................13 3. Into the Streets: Days of Rage ..........................................................................21 4. Down the Tunnel: Going Underground ..............................................................35 5. Women, The Counterculture, And The Weather People .....................................45 6. Changing Weather.............................................................................................61 7. A Second Wind? The Prairie Fire Statement ......................................................75 8. The End of the Tunnel: Weather and Its Successors..........................................83 Bibliography.............................................................................................................i A Weather Chronology ............................................................................................v The Cast ...............................................................................................................xiii List of Acronyms ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism and Political Violence Groupthink and Terrorist Radicalization
    This article was downloaded by: [S Rajaratnam School of International Studies NTU] On: 11 November 2014, At: 19:37 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Terrorism and Political Violence Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ftpv20 Groupthink and Terrorist Radicalization Eteri Tsintsadze-Maass a & Richard W. Maass b a Department of Political Science , University of Kentucky , Lexington , Kentucky , USA b Department of Law, Politics, and Society , University of Evansville , Evansville , Indiana , USA Published online: 18 Feb 2014. To cite this article: Eteri Tsintsadze-Maass & Richard W. Maass (2014) Groupthink and Terrorist Radicalization, Terrorism and Political Violence, 26:5, 735-758, DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2013.805094 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.805094 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Divider
    review Rick Perlstein, Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America Scribner: New York 2008, $37.50, hardback 881 pp, 978 0 743 24302 5 Alexander Cockburn THE GREAT DIVIDER Both candidates in the 2008 presidential campaign have trumpeted their zeal to reach across the partisan divide and forge consensus—Obama giving diffuse sermons about national unity, McCain claiming to be a maverick in order to sell himself to ‘independents’. The endless mantras of ‘change’ and ‘hope’ rely on the assumption that America is bitterly divided, as never before. The reality is, of course, that a vast majority of Americans are united in despising George Bush, and in feeling that their country has been hijacked by neo-cons and billionaires. But superficial as such campaign boiler-plate may be, it rests on a deeper-lying myth of a lost golden age in us politics, when the twin horsemen of divisiveness and faction were tightly corralled. The purpose of Rick Perlstein’s insufferably long book is laid out on its first page: to explain how ‘the battle lines that define our culture and politics’ were set between Lyndon Johnson’s landslide victory of 1964 and Richard Nixon’s mirror victory in 1972. Across its 800-plus pages, it pro- vides a ponderous chronicle of the eight years supposedly responsible for today’s Red–Blue polarization, with Nixon appearing as both emblem of the transformation and chief culprit. ‘What Richard Nixon left behind was the very terms of our national self-image: a notion that there are two kinds of Americans’—on the one hand the ‘Silent Majority .
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Deferred: Race, Politics, and D.C.’S Two-Century Struggle for Full Voting Rights
    Democracy Deferred: Race, Politics, and D.C.’s Two-Century Struggle for Full Voting Rights George Derek Musgrove Chris Myers Asch March 2021 SRDC Board of Directors Pedro Alfonso (Secretary) Charles Miller (Vice Chair) Co-Founder, Chairman and Senior Counsel Chief Executive Officer Covington & Burling LLP Dynamic Concepts Inc. B. Doyle Mitchell Jr. Sheila Brooks, Ph.D. President & CEO Founder, President & CEO Industrial Bank SRB Communications, LLC Linda D. Rabbitt Monty Hoffman Founder & Chairman Founder & Chairman Rand Construction Corporation Hoffman & Associates Daniel Solomon Jake Jones President DC Resident Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation Melissa Lavinson Anthony Williams Senior Vice President CEO & Executive Director Government & External Affairs Federal City Council Pepco Holdings, an Exelon Company Cora Williams (Treasurer) Gregory McCarthy (Chair) Founder & CEO Senior Vice President Ideal Electric Supply Corp. Community Engagement Washington Nationals Baseball Club 1 SRDC is a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization that seeks to educate the public and policymakers about the economic, financial and historical aspects of the movement for DC statehood. It fulfills its research agenda through publication of papers and other materials. It was created by prominent members of the DC business community and is being incubated at the Federal City Council, a nonprofit, nonpartisan business civic organization committed to the improvement of the District of Columbia. About the Authors George Derek Musgrove, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of History at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He is the author of Rumor, Repression, and Racial Politics: How the Harassment of Black Elected Officials Shaped Post-Civil Rights America (U. of Georgia, 2012), and co-author, with Chris Myers Asch, of Chocolate City, A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation’s Capital (UNC, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • To Disrupt, Discredit and Destroy” the FBI’S Secret War Against the Black Panther Party by Ward Churchill
    “To Disrupt, Discredit and Destroy” The FBI’s Secret War against the Black Panther Party by Ward Churchill The record of the FBI speaks for itself —J. Edgar Hoover Introduction to The FBI Story 1965 Beginning in August 1967, the Black Panther Party was savaged by a campaign of political repression, which in terms of its sheer viciousness has few parallels in American history. Coordinated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as part of its then-ongoing domestic counterintelligence program (COINTELPRO) and enlisting dozens of local police departments around the country, the assault left at least thirty Pan- thers dead, 1 scores of others imprisoned after dubious convictions,2 and hundreds more suffering perma- nent physical or psychological damage.3 Simultaneously, the Party was infiltrated at every level by agents provocateurs, all of them harnessed to the task of disrupting its internal functioning.4 Completing the package was a torrent of “disinformation” planted in the media to discredit the Panthers before the public, both personally and organizationally, thus isolating them from potential support.5 Although an entity bearing its name would continue to exist in Oakland, California for another decade, as would several offshoots situated elsewhere, the Black Panther Party in the sense that it was originally conceived was effectively destroyed by the end of 1971.6 In this, it was hardly alone. During the 1960s, similar if usually less lethal campaigns were mounted against an array of dissident groups ranging from the Socialist Workers Party to the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, from the Revolutionary Action Movement to Students for a Democratic Society, from the Republic of New Africa to the Southern Chris- tian Leadership Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • PEROT: BACK DOOR MAN Pg
    PEROT: BACK DOOR MAN Pg. 9 A JOURNAL OF FREE VOICES JULY 24, 1992 • $1.50 Remaking the Democrats MICHAEL ALEXANDER DIALOGUE No Peace in Middle East mise failed. Skaff, who maintains a Houston THE TEXAS residence and is a Democratic National I am a longtime subscriber and reader of Committee member from Texas, said the The Texas Observer and have always been Arab-American Democrats believed they impressed with the accuracy of your report- abided with the substance of the agreement. JOURNALs OF rverREE VOICES ing. I must, however, take exception to the We will serve no group or party but will hew hard to article entitled "Peace Talks Falter" in the the truth as we find it and the right as we see it. We are On Perot's Myth dedicated to. the whole truth, to human values above all June 19 1992, issue. The article was not only interests, to the rights of human-kind as the foundation inaccurate, but it was also unfairly slanted. James Cullen's piece on Perot ("Henry of democracy: we will take orders front none but our own As chairman of Texans for Justice and Ross Perot: Hit or Myth," TO 6/5/92) is by conscience, and never will we overlook or misrepresent Freedom, an organization supporting the far the best of the current round. I've xerox- the truth to serve the interests of the powedid or cater ed it liberally and passed it around. There is to the ignoble in the human spirit. U.S.-Israel relationship, I negotiated an Writers are responsible for their own work, but not agreement on platform language with Chair- a kind of Perot sickness in Dallas, and appar- for anything they have not themselves written, and in pub- man Bob Slagle of the Texas Democratic ently everywhere, waiting for Jesus, Rapture, lishing them we do not necessarily imply that we agree Party and Ruth Ann Skaff (of Memphis, Final Solution, Purity, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Media and the Weatherman "Days of Rage" Richard Boyd
    Representing Political Violence: The Mainstream Media and the Weatherman "Days of Rage" Richard Boyd By 1971 the revolutionary energies of the New Left had been pretty much exhausted, though remnant groups like the Weather Underground continued on with their tactics of violence (chiefly bombings) aimed at disrupting the Ameri­ can "war machine." Their actions attracted a considerable amount of mainstream press attention, enough to prompt the poet Allen Ginsberg to offer a rather provocative interpretation of the situation in an interview he gave to the Partisan Review in that same year: "The government is indulging in murderous violence on so vast a scale that nobody's mind can contain it. That's why it's easy to headline the Weatherman's bomb, lonely little bomb, lonely little antirobot bomb, that wasn' t intended for humans, even" (Colbert 304; also cited in Daniels 459). While Ginsberg's notion of some kind of a collective atrocity overload driving the national media may not be particularly helpful to understanding the situation, his statement remains quite interesting because it succinctly captures the deeply rhetorical nature of political violence and hints at the ways the socio- cultural functions of these representations shape our readings of them. In his reversal of the dominant media representations of these two types of American bombs and bombers, Ginsberg challenged a clear distinction long maintained by this country's mainstream media—and the public memory it shapes and nour­ ishes—between state-sanctioned violence1 and those
    [Show full text]
  • (Title of the Thesis)*
    “A New Kind of War”: The Vietnam War and The Nuremberg Principles, 1964-1968 by Luke J. Stewart A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 © Luke J. Stewart 2014 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This thesis explores what Telford Taylor called the “ethos of Nuremberg” and how it shaped antiwar resistance during the Vietnam War in the United States. The Vietnam War was a monumental event in the twentieth century and the conflict provided lawyers, academics, activists, and soldiers the ability to question the legality of the war through the prism of the Nuremberg Principles, the various international treaties and U.S. Constitutional law. As many legal scholars and historians have lamented, the Cold War destroyed hopes for the solidification of an international court empowered to preside over questions of war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace. In the absence of cooperation among the international community, the antiwar movements in the United States and around the world during the Vietnam War utilized these legal instruments to form what I call a war crimes movement from below. A significant component of this challenge was the notion that individual citizens – draft noncooperators, military resisters, tax resisters, and the like – had a responsibility under the Nuremberg Principles to resist an illegal war.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoerlk26758.Pdf
    Copyright by Kristen Elizabeth Hoerl 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Kristen Elizabeth Hoerl Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Death of Activism?: Popular Memories of 1960s Protest Committee: Dana L. Cloud, Supervisor Barry Brummett Richard Cherwitz Rosa A. Eberly Sharon Jarvis The Death of Activism?: Popular Memories of 1960s Protest by Kristen Elizabeth Hoerl, B.S., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2005 For my parents, for whom the memory of 1960s activism is alive and well; and for my grandmother, who taught me to cherish memories and question history Acknowledgements Dana Cloud deserves special recognition for her direction of this dissertation. I could not have asked for a more supportive and intellectually engaging advisor. She has challenged me with her insightful comments on numerous drafts of this dissertation, and has inspired me by her dedication to social justice. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee, Richard Cherwitz, Barry Brummett, Sharon Jarvis, and Rosa Eberly for reviewing this dissertation and for shaping my previous scholarship in rhetoric and popular media. Rosa Eberly also provided me with valuable places, physically and figuratively, from where I could begin thinking and writing about the relationship between public tragedies and shared memories. Numerous graduate student colleagues at The University of Texas at Austin have helped me during my process of completing this dissertation. I am especially grateful to Lisa Foster, Angela Aguayo, and Caroline Rankin for their advice, encouragement, and friendship.
    [Show full text]