DOCSLIB.ORG

High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Subsurface Mapping of the Lower

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Subsurface Mapping of the Lower Geological Note 13 High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Subsurface Mapping of the Lower Part of the Huron Member of the Ohio Shale in Central and Eastern Ohio Allow for Detailed Snapshots of Basin Development by Christopher B. T. Waid STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Serenko, Chief Columbus 2018 ODNR DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (614) 265-6576 2045 MORSE RD., BLDG. C-1 (614) 447-1918 (FAX) [email protected] COLUMBUS, OHIO 43229-6693 www.OhioGeology.com SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Administration Thomas J. Serenko, PhD, State Geologist and Division Chief Michael P. Angle, MS, Assistant State Geologist and Assistant Division Chief May Sholes, MBA, Financial Analyst Supervisor Renee L. Whitfield, BA, Administrative Professional Geologic Mapping & Industrial Minerals Group James D. Stucker, MS, Geologist Supervisor Douglas J. Aden, MS, Geologist Mohammad Fakhari, PhD, Geologist Franklin L. Fugitt, BS, Geologist T. Andrew Nash, MS, Geologist Brittany D. Parrick, BS, Geology Technician Christopher E. Wright, MS, Geologist Ground Water Resources Group James M. Raab, MS, Geologist Supervisor Scott C. Kirk, BS, Environmental Specialist Craig B. Nelson, MS, Hydrogeologist Mark S. Pleasants, MS, Hydrogeologist Mitchell W. Valerio, MS, Environmental Specialist Energy Resources Group Paul N. Spahr, MS, Geologist Supervisor Julie M. Bloxson, PhD, Geologist Erika M. Danielsen, MS, Geologist Derek J. Foley, MS, Geologist Samuel R. W. Hulett, MS, Geologist Michael P. Solis, MS, Geologist Christopher B. T. Waid, MS, Geologist Geologic Hazards Group D. Mark Jones, MS, Geologist Supervisor Daniel R. Blake, MS, Geologist Jeffrey L. Deisher, AAS, Geology Technician Jeffrey L. Fox, MS, Seismologist Joshua A. Novello, MS, Geologist Geologic Records Center & Library Lisa F. Long, MLIS, Librarian/Archivist Madge R. Fitak, BS, Customer Service Specialist Sylvia R. Halladay, MLS, Librarian Shirley A. Rogers, MLIS, Library Assistant Publications & Outreach Mark E. Peter, MS, Paleontologist Charles R. Salmons, MA, Publications Editor An Equal Opportunity Employer - M/F/H High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Subsurface Mapping of the Lower Part of the Huron Member of the Ohio Shale in Central and Eastern Ohio Allow for Detailed Snapshots of Basin Development by Christopher B. T. Waid Geological Note 13 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Serenko, Chief Columbus 2018 Disclaimer: This report was prepared by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey under DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-05NT42589 from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, administered through Battelle Memorial Institute. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, or Battelle Memorial Institute. Editing: Charles R. Salmons Graphic design and layout: David S. Orr Front cover: Contact of the Upper Olentangy Shale with the overlying Huron Member of the Ohio Shale at Shale Hollow Park, Lewis Center, Ohio. Photograph by Mohammad Fakhari. Recommended bibliographic citation: Waid, C.B.T., 2018, High-resolution stratigraphy and subsurface mapping of the lower part of the Huron Member of the Ohio Shale in central and eastern Ohio allow for detailed snapshots of basin development: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Geological Note 13, 18 p., 2 pls. CONTENTS Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................1 Geological and environmental setting .......................................................................................................................3 Stratigraphy of the Huron Member of the Ohio Shale ................................................................................................4 Milankovitch cycles and cyclostratigraphy .................................................................................................................5 Methodology and results ...............................................................................................................................................6 Discussion .....................................................................................................................................................................7 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................14 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................14 References cited ..........................................................................................................................................................14 FIGURES 1. Late Devonian paleogeographic map of North America .............................................................................................2 2. Generalized correlation diagram of Late Devonian units in Ohio and surrounding states ...........................................3 3. Characteristic wireline log of the Ohio Shale .............................................................................................................5 4. Gamma-ray log illustrating cycles of the lower Huron submember ............................................................................5 5. Diagram showing an idealized North American Midcontinent cyclothem .................................................................6 6. Map showing study area, county names, and cross section lines................................................................................7 7. Isopach maps for each cycle in the lower Huron submember ....................................................................................8 8. Diagram illustrating contractional overstepping .......................................................................................................13 TABLES 1. Isopach kriging model results ....................................................................................................................................7 PLATES 1. Stratigraphic cross section A–A’ ...............................................................................................................................17 2. Stratigraphic cross section B–B’ ...............................................................................................................................18 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS GEOLOGICAL NOTE Units of Measure Geologic Terms foot (feet) ft Akron Magnetic Boundary AMB grams per cubic centimeter g/ccm Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity CCSSD kilometer(s) km Frasnian Frasn. mega-annum (million years ago) ma Northwest Columbiana bathymetric high NWCBH mile(s) mi Total organic carbon TOC million years my percent by weight wt% Other Abbreviations thousand years ky Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling COCORP Enhanced gas recovery EGR Lithologic and/or Stratigraphic Units* Gamma ray GR Formation Fm Midwest Regional Carbon Member Mbr/mbr Sequestration Partnership MRCSP Shale Sh Ohio Department of Natural Resources ODNR *Lowercase lithologic and stratigraphic names and abbreviations indicate informal status of a unit. iii High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Subsurface Mapping of the Lower Part of the Huron Member of the Ohio Shale in Central and Eastern Ohio Allow for Detailed Snapshots of Basin Development by Christopher B. T. Waid ABSTRACT Milankovitch cycle, based on biostratigraphic information The Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division and transgressive-regressive sequences. The ability to of Geological Survey was involved (2003–2017) in constrain the timing of fault motion to sub-million- the collaborative, multistate Midwest Regional Carbon year time slices highlights the utility of high-resolution Sequestration Partnership project, administrated by Battelle stratigraphy for analysis of localized basin subsidence and Memorial Institute and funded by the U.S. Department of provides a useful step towards a greater understanding of Energy, to evaluate the utility of strata in the Appalachian the geologic controls of high-quality source rock deposition Basin for carbon utilization and sequestration. Part of this and preservation. research project involved developing a high-resolution stratigraphic framework for the organic-rich Upper INTRODUCTION Devonian shale interval in Ohio that will allow precise The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), characterization of the hydrocarbon production and carbon Division of Geological Survey (Ohio Geological Survey) sequestration potential of numerous shale units of this participated in the multistate Midwest Regional Carbon interval. The organic-rich lower part of the Huron Member Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) funded by the of the Ohio Shale (Famennian Stage, Devonian System) is Department of Energy under the administration of Battelle one of the units of interest for unconventional development Memorial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FISHING for DUNKLEOSTEUS You’Re Definitely Gonna Need a Bigger Boat by Mark Peter
    OOhhiioo GGeeoollooggyy EEXXTTRRAA July 31, 2019 FISHING FOR DUNKLEOSTEUS You’re definitely gonna need a bigger boat by Mark Peter At an estimated maximum length of 6 to 8.8 meters (20–29 sediments that eroded from the Acadian Mountains, combined feet), Dunkleosteus terrelli (Fig. 1) would have been a match for with abundant organic matter from newly evolved land plants even the Hollywood-sized great white shark from the and marine plankton, settled in the basin as dark organic movie Jaws. Surfers, scuba divers, and swimmers can relax, muds. Over millions of years, accumulation of additional however, because Dunkleosteus has been extinct for nearly 360 overlying sediments compacted the muds into black shale rock. million years. Dunkleosteus was a placoderm, a type of armored The rocks that formed from the Late Devonian seafloor fish, that lived during the Late Devonian Period from about sediments (along with fossils of Dunkleosteus) arrived at their 375–359 million years ago. Fossil remains of the large present location of 41 degrees north latitude after several species Dunkleosteus terrelli are present in the Cleveland hundred million years of slow plate tectonic movement as the Member of the Ohio Shale, which contains rocks that are North American Plate moved northward. approximately 360–359 million years old. Figure 1. A reconstruction of a fully-grown Dunkleosteus terrelli, assuming a length of 29 feet, with angler for scale. Modified from illustration by Hugo Salais of Metazoa Studio. Dunkleosteus cruised Late Devonian seas and oceans as an Figure 2. Paleogeographic reconstruction of eastern North America during apex predator, much like the great white shark of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 8, Issue 2, June 2009
    mag30.qxd 05/05/2009 17:46 Page 1 MAGAZINE OF THE GEOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION Volume 8 No. 2 June 2009 Appeal for the Archives WSGS Study Tour of Guernsey Meetings July/October ROCKWATCH News Awards Proceedings of the GA Bernard Leake Retires Getting the most from the PGA Dates for your Diary Presidential Address/Lecture Reports GA Trip to Chafford Hundred Book Reviews CIRCULAR 979 mag30.qxd 05/05/2009 17:45 Page 2 Magazine of the Geologists’ Association From the President Volume 8 No.2, 2009 In writing the June presidential report, I am reminded of the vital role that the GA Published by the plays in upholding the importance of geology on a range of scales, from local Geologists’ Association. to international. For example, the GA can serve as a point of contact to provide Four issues per year. CONTENTS critical information on key geological ISSN 1476-7600 sequences that are under threat from 3. The Association insensitive development plans - in short, Production team: JOHN CROCKER, acting as an expert witness. This does Paula Carey, John Cosgrove, New GA Awards not necessarily entail opposing develop- Vanessa Harley, Bill French 4. GA Meetings July/October ment but rather looking for opportunities to enhance geological resources for 5. Awards Printed by City Print, Milton Keynes future study while ensuring that they are 6. Bernard Leake Retires appropriately protected. In addition, a major part of our national earth heritage The GEOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION 7. Dates for your Diary is preserved within our museums and in does not accept any responsibility for 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithics, Landscape and People: Life Beyond the Monuments in Prehistoric Guernsey
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Department of Archaeology Lithics, Landscape and People: Life Beyond the Monuments in Prehistoric Guernsey by Donovan William Hawley Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2017 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Archaeology Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lithics, Landscape and People: Life Beyond the Monuments in Prehistoric Guernsey Donovan William Hawley Although prehistoric megalithic monuments dominate the landscape of Guernsey, these have yielded little information concerning the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Early Bronze Age communities who inhabited the island in a broader landscape and maritime context. For this thesis it was therefore considered timely to explore the alternative material culture resource of worked flint and stone archived in the Guernsey museum. Largely ignored in previous archaeological narratives on the island or considered as unreliable data, the argument made in this thesis is for lithics being an ideal resource that, when correctly interrogated, can inform us of past people’s actions in the landscape. In order to maximise the amount of obtainable data, the lithics were subjected to a wide ranging multi-method approach encompassing all stages of the châine opératoire from material acquisition to discard, along with a consideration of the landscape context from which the material was recovered. The methodology also incorporated the extensive corpus of lithic knowledge that has been built up on the adjacent French mainland, a resource largely passed over in previous Channel Island research. By employing this approach, previously unknown patterns of human occupation and activity on the island, and the extent and temporality of maritime connectivity between Guernsey and mainland areas has been revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • New Siberian Islands Archipelago)
    Detrital zircon ages and provenance of the Upper Paleozoic successions of Kotel’ny Island (New Siberian Islands archipelago) Victoria B. Ershova1,*, Andrei V. Prokopiev2, Andrei K. Khudoley1, Nikolay N. Sobolev3, and Eugeny O. Petrov3 1INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCE, ST. PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITETSKAYA NAB. 7/9, ST. PETERSBURG 199034, RUSSIA 2DIAMOND AND PRECIOUS METAL GEOLOGY INSTITUTE, SIBERIAN BRANCH, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, LENIN PROSPECT 39, YAKUTSK 677980, RUSSIA 3RUSSIAN GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (VSEGEI), SREDNIY PROSPECT 74, ST. PETERSBURG 199106, RUSSIA ABSTRACT Plate-tectonic models for the Paleozoic evolution of the Arctic are numerous and diverse. Our detrital zircon provenance study of Upper Paleozoic sandstones from Kotel’ny Island (New Siberian Island archipelago) provides new data on the provenance of clastic sediments and crustal affinity of the New Siberian Islands. Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous deposits yield detrital zircon populations that are consistent with the age of magmatic and metamorphic rocks within the Grenvillian-Sveconorwegian, Timanian, and Caledonian orogenic belts, but not with the Siberian craton. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test reveals a strong similarity between detrital zircon populations within Devonian–Permian clastics of the New Siberian Islands, Wrangel Island (and possibly Chukotka), and the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago. These results suggest that the New Siberian Islands, along with Wrangel Island and the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago, were located along the northern margin of Laurentia-Baltica in the Late Devonian–Mississippian and possibly made up a single tectonic block. Detrital zircon populations from the Permian clastics record a dramatic shift to a Uralian provenance. The data and results presented here provide vital information to aid Paleozoic tectonic reconstructions of the Arctic region prior to opening of the Mesozoic oceanic basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Exploration Geochemical Data for the Mount Katmai Quadrangle and Adjacent Parts of the Afognak and Naknek Quadrangles, Alaska
    Interpretation of Exploration Geochemical Data for the Mount Katmai Quadrangle and Adjacent Parts of the Afognak and Naknek Quadrangles, Alaska By S.E. Church, J.R. Riehle, and R.J. Goldfarb U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2020 Descriptive and interpretive supporting data for the mineral resource assessn~entof this Alaska Mineral Resource Assessnzent Program (AMRAP) study area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For Sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublieatlonData Church, S.E. Interpretation of exploration geochemical data for the Mount Katmai quadrangle and adjacent parts of the Afognak and Nalrnek quadrangles, Alaska 1 by S.E. Church, J.R. Riehle, and R.J. Goldfarb. p. cm. - (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ;2020) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : 119.3 :2020 1. Mines and mineral resources-Alaska. 2. Mining gedogy- Alaska 3. Geochemical prospecting-Alaska I. Riehle, J.R. 11. Goldfarb, R.J. UI. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2020 [TN24.A4] 557.3 5420 93-2012 [553'.09798] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................. Introduction......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Tectonic Regulation of Global Marine Animal Diversity
    Plate tectonic regulation of global marine animal diversity Andrew Zaffosa,1, Seth Finneganb, and Shanan E. Petersa aDepartment of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706; and bDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Edited by Neil H. Shubin, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved April 13, 2017 (received for review February 13, 2017) Valentine and Moores [Valentine JW, Moores EM (1970) Nature which may be complicated by spatial and temporal inequities in 228:657–659] hypothesized that plate tectonics regulates global the quantity or quality of samples (11–18). Nevertheless, many biodiversity by changing the geographic arrangement of conti- major features in the fossil record of biodiversity are consis- nental crust, but the data required to fully test the hypothesis tently reproducible, although not all have universally accepted were not available. Here, we use a global database of marine explanations. In particular, the reasons for a long Paleozoic animal fossil occurrences and a paleogeographic reconstruction plateau in marine richness and a steady rise in biodiversity dur- model to test the hypothesis that temporal patterns of continen- ing the Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic remain contentious (11, 12, tal fragmentation have impacted global Phanerozoic biodiversity. 14, 19–22). We find a positive correlation between global marine inverte- Here, we explicitly test the plate tectonic regulation hypothesis brate genus richness and an independently derived quantitative articulated by Valentine and Moores (1) by measuring the extent index describing the fragmentation of continental crust during to which the fragmentation of continental crust covaries with supercontinental coalescence–breakup cycles. The observed posi- global genus-level richness among skeletonized marine inverte- tive correlation between global biodiversity and continental frag- brates.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of Northeastern Ohio
    SDMS US EPA REGION V -1 SOME IMAGES WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE ILLEGIBLE DUE TO BAD SOURCE DOCUMENTS. GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY of NORTHEASTERN OHIO Edited by P. O. BANKS & RODNEY M. FELDMANN 1970 Northern Ohio Geological Society ELYP.i.A PU&UC LIBRARt as, BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM MISSISSIPPIAN SYSTEM DEVONIAN SYSTEM \V&fe'£:i£:VS:#: CANTON viSlSWSSWM FIGURr I Geologic map of northeastern Ohio. Individual formations within each time unit are not dis- -guished, and glacial deposits have been omitted. Because the bedding planes are nearly ••.crizontal, the map patterns of the contacts closely resemble the topographic contours at those z evations. The older and deeper units are most extensively exposed where the major rivers rave cut into them, while the younger units are preserved in the intervening higher areas. CO «< in Dev. Mississippian r-c Penn. a> 3 CO CD BRADF. KINOERHOOK MERAMEC —1 OSAGE CHESTER POTTSVIUE ro to r-» c-> e-> e= e-i GO n « -n V) CO V* o ^_ ^ 0. = -^ eo CO 3 c= « ^> <C3 at ta B> ^ °» eu ra to a O9 eo ^ a* s 1= ca \ *** CO ^ CO to CM v» o' CO to CO 3 =3 13- *•» \ ¥\ A. FIGURE 1. Columnar section ol the major stratigraphic units in northeastern Ohio showing their relative positions in the standard geologic time scale. The Devonian-Mississippian boundary is not known with certainty to lie within the Cleveland Shale. The base of the Mississippian in the northern part of the state is transitional with the Bradford Series of the Devonian System and may lie within the Cleveland Shale (Weller er a/., 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Weathering, Erosion, and Susceptibility to Weathering Henri Robert George Kenneth Hack
    Weathering, erosion, and susceptibility to weathering Henri Robert George Kenneth Hack To cite this version: Henri Robert George Kenneth Hack. Weathering, erosion, and susceptibility to weathering. Kanji, Milton; He, Manchao; Ribeira e Sousa, Luis. Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Springer Inter- national Publishing, pp.291-333, 2020, 9783030294779. 10.1007/978-3-030-29477-9. hal-03096505 HAL Id: hal-03096505 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03096505 Submitted on 5 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Published in: Hack, H.R.G.K., 2020. Weathering, erosion and susceptibility to weathering. 1 In: Kanji, M., He, M., Ribeira E Sousa, L. (Eds), Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1 ed, Ch. 11. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland. ISBN: 9783030294779. DOI: 10.1007/978303029477-9_11. pp. 291-333. Weathering, erosion, and susceptibility to weathering H. Robert G.K. Hack Engineering Geology, ESA, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente Enschede, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] phone: +31624505442 Abstract: Soft grounds are often the result of weathering. Weathering is the chemical and physical change in time of ground under influence of atmosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, biosphere, and nuclear radiation (temperature, rain, circulating groundwater, vegetation, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of the Michigan Geological Survey – Page 1 of 6 Understanding of the Michigan Basin
    MICHIGAN Geological Survey and also the first department of the State created by statute. Michigan Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 30028, 735 E. Hazel Street, The bill authorized and directed Governor Stevens T. Lansing, MI 48909. Mason, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MICHIGAN A competent person whose duty it shall be to make an GEOLOGICAL SURVEY accurate and complete geological survey of this state, which shall be accompanied with proper maps and R. Thomas Segall, State Geologist diagrams, and furnish a full and scientific description of its rocks, soils and minerals, and of its botanical and geological productions . and provide specimens of the HISTORICAL SEQUENCE OF same . ORGANIZATIONAL NAME AND An appropriation of some $3,000 was recommended to carry out the above work during the first year, and on DIRECTORS: February 23, 1837, Governor Mason signed the bill into First Geological Survey law. Douglass Houghton, State Geologist, 1837-45 As a result of this legislation, Dr. Douglass Houghton, Second Geological Survey who had conceived and planned the survey, and Alexander Winchell, State Geologist 1859-62 persuaded individual members of the legislature to Michigan Geological and Biological Survey commit money and time to this undertaking, was Alexander Winchell, State Geologist, 1869-71 appointed Michigan's first State Geologist. The Carl Rominger, State Geologist, 1871-85 Michigan Geological Survey's early accomplishments Charles E. Wright, State Geologist, 1885-88 are inextricably linked with the work and personality of M. E. Wadsworth, State Geologist, 1888-93 Dr. Houghton.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio1
    Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio1 THOMAS L. LEWIS, Department of Geological Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115 ABSTRACT. Clastic sediments, derived from southeastern, eastern and northeastern sources, prograded west- ward into a shallow basin at the northwestern margin of the Appalachian Basin in Late Devonian and Early Mississippian time. The western and northwestern boundary of the basin was the submerged Cincinnati Arch. The marine clastic wedges provided a northwest paleoslope and a distal, gentle shelf-edge margin that controlled directional emplacement of coarse elastics. Rising sea levels coupled with differences in sedimen- tation rates and localized soft-sediment deformation within the basin help explain some features of the Bedford and Berea Formations. The presence of sand-filled mudcracks and flat-topped symmetrical ripple marks in the Berea Formation attest to very shallow water deposition and local subaerial exposure at the time of emplacement of part of the formation. Absence of thick, channel-form deposits eastward suggests loss of section during emergence. OHIO J. SCI. 88 (1): 23-39, 1988 INTRODUCTION The Bedford Formation (Newberry 1870) is the most The Ohio Shale, Bedford, and Berea Formations of lithologically varied formation of the group. It is com- northern Ohio are clastic units which record prograda- prised of gray and red mudshales, siltstone, and very tional and transgressional events during Late Devonian fine-grained sandstone. The Bedford Formation thins and Early Mississippian time. The sequence of sediments both to the east and west and reaches its maximum is characterized by (1) gray mudshale, clayshale, siltstone, thickness in the Cleveland area.
    [Show full text]
  • A2 and B2: Upper Devonian Kellwasser Extinction Events in New York and Pennsylvania: Offshore to Onshore Transect Across the F
    A2 AND B2: UPPER DEVONIAN KELLWASSER EXTINCTION EVENTS IN NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA: OFFSHORE TO ONSHORE TRANSECT ACROSS THE FRASNIAN-FAMENNIAN BOUNDARY ON THE EASTERN MARGIN OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN ANDREW M. BUSH AND J. ANDREW BEARD Geosciences & Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 GORDON BAIRD Department of Geosciences, SUNY Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063 D. JEFFREY OVER Department of Geological Sciences, SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454 with contributions by KATHERINE TUSKES Department of Geological Sciences, Atmospheric, Ocean, and Earth Science, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110 SARAH K. BRISSON AND JALEIGH Q. PIER Geosciences & Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 INTRODUCTION Earth-system perturbations caused a series of mass extinction events during the Devonian Period, including the Taghanic event in the Givetian, the Lower and Upper Kellwasser events in the Frasnian, and the Hangenberg event in the Famennian (House, 2002; Bambach, 2006). These extinctions occurred against the backdrop of orbitally forced sea-level fluctuations, the Acadian Orogeny (Averbuch et al., 2005), the expansion of plants and animals on land (Algeo et al., 1995), and ecological changes in the marine biosphere (Signor and Brett, 1984; Bambach, 1999). The Frasnian-Famennian boundary in particular represents a significant global crisis, considered one of the “big five” mass extinctions (Raup and Sepkoski, 1982) that led to the demise of the widespread and diverse Devonian
    [Show full text]