Cholesterol Lowering, Cardiovascular Diseases, and the Rosuvastatin-JUPITER Controversy a Critical Reappraisal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cholesterol Lowering, Cardiovascular Diseases, and the Rosuvastatin-JUPITER Controversy a Critical Reappraisal ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Cholesterol Lowering, Cardiovascular Diseases, and the Rosuvastatin-JUPITER Controversy A Critical Reappraisal Michel de Lorgeril, MD; Patricia Salen, BSc; John Abramson, MD; Sylvie Dodin, MD; Tomohito Hamazaki, PhD; Willy Kostucki, MD; Harumi Okuyama, PhD; Bruno Pavy, MD; Mikael Rabaeus, MD Background: Among the recently reported cholesterol- tality from stroke and myocardial infarction. Cardiovas- lowering drug trials, the JUPITER (Justification for the cular mortality was surprisingly low compared with total Use of Statins in Primary Prevention) trial is unique: it mortality—between 5% and 18%—whereas the expected reports a substantial decrease in the risk of cardiovascu- rate would have been close to 40%. Finally, there was a lar diseases among patients without coronary heart dis- very low case-fatality rate of myocardial infarction, far from ease and with normal or low cholesterol levels. the expected number of close to 50%. The possibility that bias entered the trial is particularly concerning because of Methods: Careful review of both results and methods the strong commercial interest in the study. used in the trial and comparison with expected data. Conclusion: The results of the trial do not support the Results: The trial was flawed. It was discontinued (ac- use of statin treatment for primary prevention of cardio- cording to prespecified rules) after fewer than 2 years of vascular diseases and raise troubling questions concern- follow-up, with no differences between the 2 groups on ing the role of commercial sponsors. the most objective criteria. Clinical data showed a major discrepancy between significant reduction of nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction but no effect on mor- Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1032-1036 HE RESULTS OF RECENT CHO- The JUPITER trial tested the effects of lesterol-lowering drug trials rosuvastatin therapy (20 mg/d) in pa- Author Affiliations: Laboratoire on decreasing morbidity and tients without cardiovascular history or Cœur and Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Universite´ Joseph mortality among persons established CHD and with normal or low Fourier and Centre National de with or without coronary cholesterol levels but relatively high lev- la Recherche Scientifique, heart disease (CHD) have been consis- els of C-reactive protein, a fluctuating T 1-9 18 Grenoble, France (Dr de Lorgeril tently negative. However, there is one biologic marker of inflammation. The au- and Ms Salen); Harvard Medical exception, the JUPITER (Justification for thors reported a 50% reduction in low- School, Boston, Massachusetts the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention) density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, a (Dr Abramson); Department of 37% reduction in C-reactive protein lev- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, See also pages 1007, els, and a roughly 50% decrease in car- Laval University, Quebec City, diovascular complications.10 The publica- Quebec, Canada (Dr Dodin); 1024, and 1073 tion of the JUPITER trial (in November Department of Clinical Sciences, 2008) was much anticipated since the Institute of Natural Medicine, trial,10 which showed—in primary preven- University of Toyama, Japan announcement of the trial’s premature dis- tion—a striking decrease in CHD compli- continuation in March 2008,19,20 at a meet- (Dr Hamazaki); Cardiology cations. The JUPITER trial rapidly pro- Department, Clinique Antoine 11-13 ing of the American College of Cardiol- Depage, Brussels, Belgium voked controversy regarding both the ogy, following the presentation of the (Dr Kostucki); Open Research results and the methods used in the trial. disappointing results of the ENHANCE Center for Lipid Nutrition, Kinjo Although enthusiastic comments have (Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercho- 14-17 Gakuin University, Nagoya, been published, and the results have lesterolemia Enhances Atherosclerosis Japan (Dr Okuyama); undoubtedly propelled many healthy per- Regression) trial.9 Similarly to ezetimibe Re´adaptation Cardiovasculaire, sons without elevated cholesterol levels onto (tested in the ENHANCE trial), rosuva- Centre Hospitalier long-term statin treatment, the clinical rel- de Machecoul, Machecoul, statin was already the subject of aggres- France (Dr Pavy); and evance of the JUPITER trial remains in ques- sive marketing despite the absence of evi- Cardiology Department, tion. To understand the rosuvastatin- dence that its use actually decreased CHD Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, JUPITER controversy, we critically review complications. Indeed, disregarding open- Switzerland (Dr Rabaeus). several significant issues of that study. label studies such as ASTEROID (A Study (REPRINTED) ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 170 (NO. 12), JUNE 28, 2010 WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM 1032 ©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/30/2021 to Evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin on Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Coronary Atheroma Burden),21 3 Table. A Summary of the JUPITER Trial Resultsa trials with rosuvastatin (CORONA [Controlled Rosu- vastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure],1 GISSI-HF Rosuvastatin Placebo Group Group [Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza End Point (n=8901) (n=8901) 3 nell’Infarto Miocardio–Heart Failure], and AURORA [A b Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Primary end point 142 251 Nonfatal myocardial infarction 22 62 Regular Haemodialysis: An Assessment of Survival and Any myocardial infarction 31 68 5 Cardiovascular Events] ) had been conducted, and all had Nonfatal stroke 30 58 failed to provide evidence that rosuvastatin therapy re- Any stroke 33 64 duces CHD complications. The failure of rosuvastatin to Arterial revascularization 71 131 show a significant protective effect was also true for pa- Hospitalization for unstable angina 16 27 tients with established CHD, because most patients in the Myocardial infarction, stroke, or confirmed 83 157 deaths from cardiovascular causes CORONA and GISSI-HF trials were survivors of a pre- Death from any cause on known date 190 235 vious myocardial infarction. a Adapted from Ridker et al.10 METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS b A combination of myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, IN THE JUPITER TRIAL hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes. The JUPITER trial was prematurely terminated. Although CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL having prespecified early stopping rules is a well-accepted INCONSISTENCIES IN THE JUPITER TRIAL feature of clinical trials, it is critical that the rules truly be prespecified. In the case of the JUPITER trial, the prespeci- In any trial, the consistency of clinical data must be ex- fied rules were not detailed in the published description of amined to determine whether methodological flaws have the study protocol.22 Indeed, we still do not know which increased the risk of bias. For instance, in cardiology, com- end point was used to define them, or which level of ben- parison of the rate of hard end points—fatal and nonfa- efits—unexpected on the basis of the a priori calculated hy- tal myocardial infarction and stroke, which represent most pothesis22—was required to justify early termination. Also, cardiovascular complications in any population—to those it was recently shown that truncated trials are associated expected from a comparable population, at least in the with greater effect sizes than trials that are not stopped early, placebo group, provides such a check on methodology. and this effect is independent of the presence of statistical At first glance (Table), the difference between the 2 stopping rules.23 In defending the decision to end the trial groups in terms of hard end points seems impressive (157 early, the JUPITER investigators stated that the decision vs 83 for placebo and rosuvastatin, respectively). But are was not made by them but by members of an independent these differences plausible? Although an “unequivocal re- safety-monitoring board.24 However, the chairman of this duction in cardiovascular mortality” was announced in board—an investigator of the Clinical Trial Service Unit of March 2008 as the main justification for the premature trial Oxford University, Oxford, England—has been, and still termination,19,20 the absence of cardiovascular mortality is, involved in many other industry-sponsored lipid- data in the published article is striking. One may infer from lowering trials, raising issues of conflict of interest.25,26 the Table—although not indicated in the text—that the Fueling concern about the termination of the study is total number of fatal myocardial infarctions was 9 in the that the data are not consistent with a large difference be- rosuvastatin group (the difference between 31 “any myo- tween treatment and placebo. The primary end point cardial infarctions” and 22 “nonfatal myocardial infarc- (Table, line 1) is a composite of cardiovascular compli- tions”) and 6 (68−62) in the placebo group. Similar cal- cations, some of which—such as revascularization and hos- culations for fatal stroke (the difference between “any pital admission—are of less relevance because they are not stroke” and “nonfatal stroke”) show 3 (33−30) in the ro- complications but medical decisions. Taking only the hard suvastatin group and 6 (64−58) in the placebo group. end points of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and Cardiovascular mortality (fatal stroke plus fatal myo- stroke (Table, line 8)—the end points that are less open cardial infarction) would therefore be identical in both to bias and
Recommended publications
  • Adverse Drug Reaction News Published by the Health Products Regulation Group, HSA and the HSA Pharmacovigilance Advisory Committee
    ISSN: 0219 - 2152 April 2011 Vol.13 No.1 Adverse Drug Reaction News Published by the Health Products Regulation Group, HSA and the HSA Pharmacovigilance Advisory Committee Consumer health product recalls Voluntary recalls of mouth rinses and cleansing wipes Over the recent months, the following four products were voluntarily recalled by their Reports of B. cepacia-contaminated distributors following detection of Burkholderia cepacia (B. cepacia) in certain batches of products overseas1-3 the products: B. cepacia is known to contaminate health ■ “Oral Guard Antiseptic-Antiplaque Mouthwash” by Medimex Singapore products. There have been reported cases ■ “Trihexid Chlorhexidine 0.2% Mouth Rinse” by Trident Pharm Pte Ltd of B. cepacia detected in a variety of ■ “Pearlie White Fluorinze Fluoride Mouth Rinse” by Corlison Pte Ltd products in other countries such as the United States (US), Australia and Canada. ■ “Care Wipes” by Tai Sun Paper Products Pte Ltd (Singapore) The types of products affected include mouthwashes, mouth gels, nasal sprays and hand sanitisers. A recent case in November 2009 involved the recall of three lots of Vicks Sinex Nasal Spray by Procter & Gamble2 in the US, Germany and the United Kingdom. The company detected B. cepacia in the product during routine quality control at its plant located in Germany. The company’s analysis showed that the problem was limited to a single batch of raw material mixture involving three lots of product sold in the US, Germany and the UK. No reports of illness were received by The consumer level recall was initiated as a precautionary measure to safeguard public the company.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Density Lipoproteins in Kidney Disease
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review High-Density Lipoproteins in Kidney Disease Valentina Kon 1, Hai-Chun Yang 1,2, Loren E. Smith 3, Kasey C. Vickers 4 and MacRae F. Linton 4,5,* 1 Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; [email protected] (V.K.); [email protected] (H.-C.Y.) 2 Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA 3 Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; [email protected] 4 Atherosclerosis Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Decades of epidemiological studies have established the strong inverse relationship be- tween high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentration and cardiovascular disease. Recent evidence suggests that HDL particle functions, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant func- tions, and cholesterol efflux capacity may be more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease protection than HDL cholesterol concentration. These HDL functions are also relevant in non- cardiovascular diseases, including acute and chronic kidney disease. This review examines our current understanding of the kidneys’ role in HDL metabolism and homeostasis, and the effect of kidney disease on HDL composition and functionality. Additionally, the roles of HDL particles, proteins, and small RNA cargo on kidney cell function and on the development and progression of both acute and chronic kidney disease are examined. The effect of HDL protein modification Citation: Kon, V.; Yang, H.-C.; Smith, by reactive dicarbonyls, including malondialdehyde and isolevuglandin, which form adducts with L.E.; Vickers, K.C.; Linton, M.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Tredaptive, INN-Nicotinic Acid/Laropiprant
    European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use Doc.Ref.: EMEA/348364/2008 CHMP ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Tredaptive International Nonproprietary Name: nicotinic acid / laropiprant Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/889 Assessment Report as adopted by the CHMPauthorised with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. longer no product Medicinal 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax (44-20) 74 18 85 45 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.emea.europa.eu © European Medicines Agency, 2008. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROCEDURE........................................... 3 1.1 Submission of the dossier ........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Steps taken for the assessment of the product.......................................................................... 3 2 SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Quality aspects......................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Non-clinical aspects................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Clinical aspects .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Flushing Due to Niacin and Abolition of These Effects
    Review Paper Mechanisms of Flushing Due to Niacin and Abolition of These Effects Aditya Sood, BS; Rohit Arora, MD There are many factors that increase the risk of that has been known to have many pharmaco- cardiovascular disease, and a prominent factor logic uses. When niacin is taken in large doses, it among these is dyslipidemia. The following litera- blocks the breakdown of fats in adipose tissue, ture review focuses on the use of niacin therapy therefore altering the lipid levels of blood. Niacin in order to treat dyslipidemia and how to control may be used in treating hyperlipidemia because it the associated ‘‘niacin flush.’’ The associated lowers very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol studies gathered are reviews and randomized con- (VLDL-C), which is a precursor of low-density trol trials. They were obtained by using electronic lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or ‘‘bad’’ choles- searches. Certain keywords took precedence, and terol. Due to its inhibitory effects on breakdown articles focusing on niacin therapy were chosen. of fats, niacin causes a decrease in free fatty acids Recent research has found promising insight into in the blood, therefore decreasing secretion of more effective prevention of the niacin-mediated VLDL-C and cholesterol by the liver. flush through a selective antagonist for the pros- Also, by lowering VLDL-C levels in the blood, taglandin D2 receptor, laropiprant. Aspirin (or niacin increases the level of high-density lipoprotein NSAIDs) also provide some prevention for flush- cholesterol (HDL-C), or ‘‘good’’ cholesterol. There- ing, although recent studies have shown that it is fore, niacin serves a purpose in helping patients with not as effective as laropiprant.
    [Show full text]
  • AIM-HIGH and HDL President, IMNG Alan J
    2 NEWS JULY 2011 • CARDIOLOGY NEWS HEART OF THE MATTER Cardiology News AIM-HIGH and HDL President, IMNG Alan J. Imhoff hen the National Heart, Lung, placebo group, in order to reach a target Editor in Chief Mary Jo M. Dales Executive Director, Operations Jim Chicca and Blood Institute announced LDL cholesterol level of less than 80 Executive Editors Denise Fulton, Kathy Scarbeck Director, Production/Manufacturing Yvonne Evans Struss that the Atherothrombosis In- mg/dL. This is somewhat ironic since Managing Editor Catherine Hackett W Production Manager Judi Sheffer Senior Editors Christina Chase, Kathryn tervention in Metabolic Syndrome With niacin plus statin was reported to be more Production Specialists Maria Aquino, Anthony DeMott, Jeff Evans, Lori Buckner Farmer, Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on effective than ezetimibe plus statin in re- Draper, Rebecca Slebodnik Keith Haglund, Gina L. Henderson, Sally Koch Global Health (AIM-HIGH) trial was be- ducing carotid intima-media thickness in Kubetin, Teresa Lassman, Mark S. Lesney, Creative Director Louise A. Koenig ing terminated because of the futility of the ARBITER 6-HALTS study (N. Engl. J. Jane Salodof MacNeil, Renée Matthews, Design Supervisor Elizabeth Byrne Lobdell showing benefit, the study’s failure made Med. 2009;361:2113-22). Catherine Cooper Nellist, Amy Pfeiffer, Terry Senior Designers Sarah L.G. Breeden, Yenling Liu Rudd, Leanne Sullivan, Elizabeth Wood front page news. The National Lipid Association has rec- Designer Lisa M. Marfori The medical community, patient popu- ommended that physicians should wait Editorial Production Manager Carol Nicotera-Ward Photo Editor Catherine Harrell Associate Editors Felicia Rosenblatt Black, Web Production Engineer Jon Li lation, and interested public ask “why?” at until the full results of AIM-HIGH are re- Therese Borden, Lorinda Bullock, Jay C.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Lipid Signalling in Disease Matthias P
    Targeting lipid signalling in disease Matthias P. Wymann, Thomas Rückle, Christian Rommel, Matthias Schwarz and Roger Schneiter Lipids are important mediators in cancer and inflammation, and in protein kinase cascades, nuclear receptors, stimulate guanine cardiovascular, degenerative and metabolic disease. A complex nucleotide exchange factors and small GTPases, while others act protein–lipid interaction network comprising phosphoinositides, extracellularly on GPCRs. These signals therefore control metabolism, sphingolipids, steroids and other lipid-derived mediators has been growth, proliferation and cell migration. Here, we provide an overview uncovered over the past few years. Many of the signalling lipids may of this protein-lipid signalling network, and how it can be exploited to directly interact with intracellular effector proteins to trigger multiple attenuate proliferative, inflammatory and metabolic disease. Abbreviations High-intensity colour indicates Target Activity Compound Indication (status) Refs 5-LO, 5-lipoxygenase; ALX, lipoxin A(4) receptor; C1/2 domain, conserved activity of signalling pathway Lipid-modifying enzymes region-1/2; C1P, ceramide 1-phosphate; CCR, chemokine receptor; Cer, in disease: cPLA2 Inhibitor Giripladib (PLA-695) 1 Inflammation (Phase II) 1 ceramide; CerK, ceramide kinase; COX, cyclooxygenase; cPLA2, cytosolic PLCB1, 2, 3, 4 Inhibitor CPR-1006 2 – (discovery) 2 phospholipase A2; DAG, diacylglycerol; DD, death domain; DP, prostaglandin D; PI3K, mTOR TNF 56 Hormone- Inhibitor Orlistat 3 Metabolic
    [Show full text]
  • CMS Star Ratings: a Health System’S Approach to Exceeding Expectations
    Magellan Rx Report Summer 2012 Transitioning to Summer Benefi ts of The PPACA Pediatric the Pioneer ACO 2012 Motivational Contraception Buprenorphine Model Interviewing Mandate Exposure Magellan Rx Report MEDICAL AND PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGEMENT CMS Star Ratings: A Health System’s Approach to Exceeding Expectations www.magellanhealth.com 1 When I say bolus, you say gotcha. Bolus. Gotcha. Meet OneTouch® Ping.® The glucose management system that’s twice as smart. Meet the brainchild of OneTouch® > Accurate carb counting: and Animas: a system designed CalorieKing™, a 500-item to help your patients perform at customizable food database, their best. is in the meter-remote for more precise bolusing On the one side, you have a brilliant insulin pump. On the > Lifestyle-focused performance: other, a supersmart meter-remote the only system with a pump that does much more than test that has a color screen for blood glucose. outstanding readability and is tested and proven waterproof > Individualized control: a pump up to 12 feet for 24 hours.* with a low basal increment (0.025 U/hr) for fine-tuned dosing All this, plus the support you’ve come to expect from Animas for > Remote bolus calculation and both you and your patients. bolusing: a meter-remote that, like the pump, has a bolus For information on prescribing calculator (patients also have OneTouch® Ping®, call Animas the option to bolus directly from at 1-877-937-7867 or visit the pump) OneTouchPing.com. The conversation continues at OneTouchPing.com. *The meter-remote must not be exposed to water. OneTouch® Ping® manufacturer: Animas Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotinic Acid: a Lipid-Lowering Agent with Unrealized Potential Samar H
    Review article 1 Nicotinic acid: a lipid-lowering agent with unrealized potential Samar H. Aboulsoud Department of Internal Medicine, School Nicotinic acid is a well-known treatment for dyslipidemia in adults. This review article of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt explored not only the role of nicotinic acid in dyslipidemia but also its role in hypertension Correspondence to Samar H. Aboulsoud, and as a cardioprotective agent. Adverse effects in association with nicotinic acid use are MBBCH, MSc, MD, Department of Internal described with a focus on flushing, the major reason for the discontinuation of nicotinic Medicine, Cairo University, Director of acid therapy. The role of nicotinic acid receptor in mediating its metabolic and vascular Accreditation, Supreme Council of Health, Doha, Qatar, PO Box 7744, Egypt effects is also reviewed. Fax: + 00974 55315256; e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Received 30 March 2013 cardiovascular protection, dyslipidemia, flushing, nicotinic acid Accepted 31 May 2013 Egypt J Intern Med 26:1–5 The Egyptian Society of Internal Medicine © 2014 The Egyptian Society of Internal Medicine 2014, 26:1–5 1110-7782 Introduction increased intracellular apolipoprotein B degradation and increased TG lipolysis in adipose tissue. Nicotinic acid, or niacin, an essential nutrient of the vitamin B complex group, is a well-known treatment A classification of the effects of nicotinic acid on the for dyslipidemia in adults. It is highly effective in basis of the onset and duration of action was presented increasing the level of high-density lipoprotein by Bodor and Offermanns [6]. They reported that the (HDL) cholesterol and has been beneficial in reducing most rapid effect is a decrease in the plasma levels of cardiovascular events in patients with dyslipidemia [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant: Reducing Niacin-Induced Flushing to Better Realize the Benefit of Niacin in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Factors
    Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant: Reducing Niacin-Induced Flushing to Better Realize the Benefit of Niacin in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Factors John F. Paolini, MD, PhDa,*,HaroldE.Bays,MDb, Christie M. Ballantyne, MDc, Michael Davidson, MDd, Richard Pasternak, MDa, Darbie Maccubbin, PhDa, Josephine M. Norquist, MSe, Eseng Lai, MD, PhDa, M. GerardWaters, PhDa, Olga Kuznetsova, PhDa, Christine McCrary Sisk, BSa,Yale B. Mitchel, MDa KEYWORDS Cardiovascular risk Extended-release niacin Flushing Laropiprant Prostaglandin D2 A substantial body of experimental, epidemiologic, Guidelines from regulatory bodies and expert and clinical trial data demonstrates that increased panels have established different CHD risk cate- plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) gories and specific LDL-C treatment targets for is associated with the progression of atheroscle- each category.1,4 Statin drugs are recommended rotic coronary heart disease (CHD), and lowering as the initial therapy for lowering CHD risk, based LDL-C levels reduces CHD risk. Thus, reducing on their LDL-C-lowering efficacy and favorable LDL-C levels remains the primary lipoprotein treat- safety profile for most patients. Although relative ment target for reducing the risk of CHD.1–3 risk reductions in major cardiovascular events Merck & Company, Incorporated provided financial support for the conduct of the studies described in this article. John F. Paolini, Richard Pasternak, Darbie Maccubbin, Josephine M. Norquist, Eseng Lai, M. Gerard Waters, Olga Kuznetsova, Christine McCrary Sisk, and Yale B. Mitchel are employees of Merck & Company, Incorporated who may own stock and/or hold stock options in the company. Harold E. Bays, Christie M. Ballantyne, and Michael Davidson have served as clinical investigators for Merck & Company, Incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee
    National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee Record of Reasons 53rd Meeting 17-18 June 2008 National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee Record of Reasons of Meeting 53 – June 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................ IV 2. PROPOSED CHANGES/ADDITIONS TO PARTS 1 TO 3 AND PART 5 OF THE STANDARD FOR THE UNIFORM SCHEDULING OF DRUGS AND POISONS...............................1 2.1 SUSDP, PART 1...........................................................................................................................1 2.1.1 Interpretation of aerosol concentration in the SUSDP............................................................1 2.2 SUSDP, PART 2...........................................................................................................................1 2.3 SUSDP, PART 3...........................................................................................................................1 2.4 SUSDP, PART 5...........................................................................................................................1 2.4.1 Appendix I (The Uniform Paint Standard - UPS) including lead in paints or tinters..............1 AGRICULTURAL/VETERINARY, INDUSTRIAL AND DOMESTIC CHEMICALS......................19 3. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING (CONSIDERATION OF POST-MEETING SUBMISSIONS UNDER 42ZCZ)....................................19 3.1 PYRITHIONE ZINC
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment)
    Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2018 ISSN 1726-4898 ISBN 978-82-8082-896-5 Suggested citation: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2018. Oslo, Norway, 2017. © Copyright WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Oslo, Norway. Use of all or parts of the material requires reference to the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Copying and distribution for commercial purposes is not allowed. Changing or manipulating the material is not allowed. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 21st edition WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Norwegian Institute of Public Health P.O.Box 4404 Nydalen N-0403 Oslo Norway Telephone: (47) 21078160 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.whocc.no Previous editions: 1990: Guidelines for ATC classification1) 1991: Guidelines for DDD1) 1993: Guidelines for ATC classification 1993: Guidelines for DDD 1996: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 1998: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2000: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2001: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2002: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2003: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2004: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2005: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2006: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2007: Guidelines for ATC classification
    [Show full text]