Arxiv:2001.04793V2 [Math.CA]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ON A NEW GENERATING FUNCTIONS FOR THE FOX-WRIGHT FUNCTIONS AND THEIRS APPLICATIONS KHALED MEHREZ Abstract. The main focus of the present paper is to investigate several generating functions for a certain classes of functions associated to the Fox-Wright functions. In particular, certain generating functions for a class of function involving the Fox-Wright functions will be expressed in terms of the H- function of two variables are investigated. As applications, some generating functions associated to the generalized Mathieu type power series and the extended Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function are established. Furthermore, some new double series identity are considered. A conjecture about the finite Laplace transform of a class of function associated to the Fox’s H-function is made. 1. Introduction Throughout the present investigation, we use the following standard notations: N := 1, 2, 3, ... , N := 0, 1, 2, 3, ... { } 0 { } and Z− := 1, 2, 3, ... {− − − } Also, as usual, Z denotes the set of integers, R denotes the set of real numbers, R+ denotes the set of positive numbers and C denotes the set of complex numbers. Here, and in what follows, we use pΨq[.] to denote the Fox-Wright generalization of the familiar hypergeometric pFq function with p numerator and q denominator parameters, defined by [26, p. 4, Eq. (2.4)] (a1,A1),...,(ap,Ap) (ap,Ap) pΨq z = pΨq z (b1,B1),...,(bq,Bq ) (bq ,Bq ) (1.1) h i ∞ h p i k l=1 Γ( al + kAl) z = q , l=1 Γ(bl + kBl) k! Xk=0 Q where, Q (A 0, l =1, ..., p; B 0, and l =1, ..., q). l ≥ l ≥ The convergence conditions and convergence radius of the series at the right-hand side of (1.1) immediately follow from the known asymptotics of the Euler Gamma–function. The defining series in (1.1) converges in the whole complex z-plane when q p (1.2) ∆ = B A > 1. j − i − j=1 i=1 X X If ∆= 1, then the series in (1.1) converges for z < ρ, and z = ρ under the condition (µ) > 1 , (see − | | | | ℜ 2 arXiv:2001.04793v2 [math.CA] 6 Apr 2020 [6] for details), where p q q p B p q (1.3) ρ = A−Ai B j , µ = b a + − i j j − k 2 i=1 ! j=1 j=1 Y Y X kX=1 Throughout this paper, we denote by a A a A (σ,1),( p, p) 1 (σ,1),( p, p) (1.4) p+1Ψˇ q z = p+1Ψq z . (bq ,Bq ) Γ(σ) (bq ,Bq ) h i h i File: GM_FW.tex, printed: 2020-04-7, 1.00 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 30C45, 30D15, 33C10. Key words and phrases. Fox-Wright function, Fox H-function, Hypergeometric function, Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function, Generating functions. 1 2 K. MEHREZ The generalized hypergeometric function pFq is defined by ∞ p (a ) zk (1.5) F a1,...,ap z = l=1 l k p q b1,...,bq q l=1(bl)k k! h i k=0 Q X where, as usual, we make use of the following notation: Q Γ(τ + k) (τ) =1, and (τ) = τ(τ + 1)...(τ + k 1) = , k N, 0 k − Γ(τ) ∈ to denote the shifted factorial or the Pochhammer symbol. Obviously, we find from the definitions (1.1) and (1.5) that (a1,1),...,(ap,1) Γ(a )...Γ(a ) (1.6) Ψ z = 1 p F a1,...,ap z . p q p q b1,...,bq (b1,1),...,(bq,1) Γ(b1)...Γ(bq) h i h i Generating functions play an important role in the investigation of va rious useful properties of the sequences which they generate. They are used to find certain properties and formulas for numbers and polynomials in a wide variety of research subjects, indeed, in modern combinatorics. In this regard, in fact, a remarkable large number of generating functions involving a variety of special functions have been developed by many authors [1, 2, 22, 3, 18, 19, 20, 21]. In a recent papers [8],[9],[10], Mehrez have studied certain advanced properties of the Fox-Wright function including its new integral representations, the Laplace and Stieltjes transforms, Luke inequalities, Tur´an type inequalities and completely monotonicity property are derived. In particular, it was shown there that the following Fox-Wright functions are completely monotone: (αp,A) pΨq z , s> 0, (βq ,A) − h i (λ,1),(α p,Ap) 1 p+1Ψq s> 0, (βq,1) z h i and has proved that the Fox’s H-function Hp,0[.] constitutes the representing measure for the Fox-Wright q,p function pΨq[.], if µ> 0, i.e., [8, Theorem 1] (αp,Ap) ρ (Bq ,βq) zt p,0 dt (1.7) pΨq z = e Hq,p t . (βq,Bq ) 0 (Ap,αp) t h i Z p,0 when µ> 0. Here, and in what follows, we use Hq,p [.] to denote the Fox’s H-function, defined by p (Bq ,βq ) p,0 1 j=1 Γ(Aj s + αj ) −s (1.8) Hq,p z = q z ds, (Ap,αp) 2iπ L Γ(Bks + βk) Z Qk=1 where Aj ,Bk > 0 and αj ,βk are real. The contour Qcan be either the left loop − starting at + iα and ending at + iβ for some α< 0 <β such thatL all poles of the integrand lieL inside the loop,−∞ or the right loop starting−∞ + iα at and ending + iβ and leaving all poles on the left, or the vertical line L+ ∞ ∞ ic, (z)= c, traversed upward and leaving all poles of the integrand on the left. Denote the rightmost poleL ℜ of the integrand by γ : γ = min (aj /Aj ). 1≤j≤p The definition of the H-function is still valid when the Ai’s and Bj ’s are positive rational numbers. Therefore, the H-function contains, as special cases, all of the functions which are expressible in terms of the G-function. More importantly, it contains the Fox-Wright generalized hypergeometric function defined in (1.1), the generalized Mittag-Leffler functions, etc. For example, the function pΨq[.] is one of these special case of H-function. By the definition (1.1) it is easily extended to the complex plane as follows [7, Eq. 1.31], (α ,A ) (A ,1−α ) p p 1,q p p (1.9) pΨq z = Hp,q+1 z . (βq ,Bq ) − (0,1),(Bq ,1−βq) h i The representation (1.9) holds true only for positive values of the parameters Ai and Bj . The special case for which the H-function reduces to the Meijer G-function is when A1 = ... = Ap = B1 = ... = Bq = A, A> 0. In this case, (Bq ,βq ) Bq m,n 1 m,n 1/A (1.10) Hq,p z = Gp,q z . (Ap,αp) A αp GENERATING FUNCTIONS INVOLVING THE FOX-WRIGHT FUNCTIONS 3 In our present investigation, certain generating functions for some classes of function related to the Fox-Wright functions will be evaluated in terms of the H-function of two variables. In order to present the results, we need the definition of the H-function of two complex variables introduced earlier by Mittal and Gupta [11]. The analysis developed here is based on the work of Saxena and Nishimoto [13], Saigo and Saxena [14]. The H-function of two variables is defined in terms of multiple Mellin-Barnes type contour integral as A a c E e (αp1 ; p1 , p1 ):( p2 ,γp2 );( p3 , p3 ) x 0,n1:m2,n2;m3,n3 x H y = Hp1,q1:p2,q2;p3,q3 y (βq ;Bq ,bq ):(dq ,δq );(Fq ,fq ) (1.11) 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 = φ(s,t) φ (s)φ (t)xsytdsdt, −4π2 1 2 ZL1 ZL2 where x and y are not equal to zero. For convenience the parameters (αp1 ; Ap1 , ap1 ) and (cp2 ,γp2 ) will abbreviate the sequence of the parameters (α1; A1,a1), ..., (αp1 ; Ap1 ,ap1 ) and (c1,γ1), ..., (cp2 ,γp2 ) respectively, and similar meanings hold for the other parameters (βq1 ; Bq1 , bq1 ) and (dq2 ,δq2 ) , etc. Here n1 Γ(1 α + a s + A t) (1.12) φ(s,t)= i=1 − i i i p1 q1 i=n +1 Γ(αi Qais Ait) j=1 Γ(1 βj + bj s + Bj t) 1 − − − Q hQ i m2 Γ(d δ s) [ n2 Γ(1 c + γ s)] j=1 j − j i=1 − i i (1.13) φ1(s)= qh2 i p2 Q Γ(1 dj + δj sQ) Γ(ci γis) j=m2+1 − i=n2+1 − hQ i Q m3 Γ(f F t) [ n3 Γ(1 e + E t)] j=1 j − j i=1 − i i (1.14) φ2(t)= , q3h i p3 Q Γ(1 fj + FjtQ) Γ(ei Eit) j=m3 +1 − i=n3+1 − h i where αi,βj ,ci,dj,ei and fj beQ complex numbers and associatedQ coefficients ai, Ai,bj,Bj ,γi,δj , Ei and Fj be real and positive for the standardization purposes, such that p1 p2 q1 q2 (1.15) ρ = a + γ b δ 0, 1 i i − j − j ≤ i=1 i=1 j=1 j=1 X X X X p1 p2 q1 q2 (1.16) ρ = A + E B F 0, 2 i i − j − j ≤ i=1 i=1 j=1 j=1 X X X X p1 q1 m2 p2 n2 p2 (1.17) Ω1 = ai bj + δj δj + γi γi > 0, − − − − i=n +1 j=1 j=1 j=m +1 i=1 i=n +1 X1 X X X2 X X2 p1 q1 m2 p2 n2 p2 (1.18) Ω2 = Ai Bj + Fj Fj + Ei Ei > 0.