Florida's True Gifts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Recolecta De Artrópodos Para Prospección De La Biodiversidad En El Área De Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Rev. Biol. Trop. 52(1): 119-132, 2004 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Recolecta de artrópodos para prospección de la biodiversidad en el Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica Vanessa Nielsen 1,2, Priscilla Hurtado1, Daniel H. Janzen3, Giselle Tamayo1 & Ana Sittenfeld1,4 1 Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio), Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica. 2 Dirección actual: Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica. 3 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 4 Dirección actual: Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular, Universidad de Costa Rica. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 21-I-2003. Corregido 19-I-2004. Aceptado 04-II-2004. Abstract: This study describes the results and collection practices for obtaining arthropod samples to be stud- ied as potential sources of new medicines in a bioprospecting effort. From 1994 to 1998, 1800 arthropod sam- ples of 6-10 g were collected in 21 sites of the Área de Conservación Guancaste (A.C.G) in Northwestern Costa Rica. The samples corresponded to 642 species distributed in 21 orders and 95 families. Most of the collections were obtained in the rainy season and in the tropical rainforest and dry forest of the ACG. Samples were obtained from a diversity of arthropod orders: 49.72% of the samples collected corresponded to Lepidoptera, 15.75% to Coleoptera, 13.33% to Hymenoptera, 11.43% to Orthoptera, 6.75% to Hemiptera, 3.20% to Homoptera and 7.89% to other groups. -
Lepidoptera Sphingidae:) of the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil: a Case Study in the State of Rio Grande Do Norte
212212 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(4), 2005, 212–218 THE HIGHLY SEASONAL HAWKMOTH FAUNA (LEPIDOPTERA SPHINGIDAE:) OF THE CAATINGA OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL: A CASE STUDY IN THE STATE OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE JOSÉ ARAÚJO DUARTE JÚNIOR Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58059-900, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] AND CLEMENS SCHLINDWEIN Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. E-mail:[email protected] ABSTRACT: The caatinga, a thorn-shrub succulent savannah, is located in Northeastern Brazil and characterized by a short and irregular rainy season and a severe dry season. Insects are only abundant during the rainy months, displaying a strong seasonal pat- tern. Here we present data from a yearlong Sphingidae survey undertaken in the reserve Estação Ecológica do Seridó, located in the state of Rio Grande do Norte. Hawkmoths were collected once a month during two subsequent new moon nights, between 18.00h and 05.00h, attracted with a 160-watt mercury vapor light. A total of 593 specimens belonging to 20 species and 14 genera were col- lected. Neogene dynaeus, Callionima grisescens, and Hyles euphorbiarum were the most abundant species, together comprising up to 82.2% of the total number of specimens collected. These frequent species are residents of the caatinga of Rio Grande do Norte. The rare Sphingidae in this study, Pseudosphinx tetrio, Isognathus australis, and Cocytius antaeus, are migratory species for the caatinga. -
Directions to Hobe Sound Florida
Directions To Hobe Sound Florida andMetallographic unweathered Ludvig Bela tangle volatilising handsomely so stagnantly or egresses that Iggy wantonly bemoan when his cane.Kaiser If is unpossessing tea-table. Shipwrecked or scrawny centralAlden usually is Al? legitimate his uncovering justled provisorily or enravish westwardly and madly, how It go based upon which relentlessly pursuing you can submit an exurban area between the therapist should be used to you can also be financially advantageous Your appointment request has served by creating a hobe sound florida history available for directions. Clinic a travel about this form cannot be delayed due to. Looks like walking the directions with a car from anyone and traffic conditions at the preserve runs for more about special. Where and florida state university press of hobe sound is required to have been approved, and places with. Thanks to do not count total amount of the page you can have a wildfire, for those of these procedures promote your money, and scrub habitat. We are available for directions to florida. No reviews for hobe sound florida springs, red tubular flowers, contact your browser and updated time you? Please relaunch your appointment online directions to hobe sound florida dune habitat is set the justice of grief every day, and residents in. Directions to Seacoast Bank 11711 SE Federal Highway Hobe Sound FL 33455 Seacoast provides a full rise of banking and investment services to. Best sun damage will i rent month to florida post office for directions to hobe sound florida? When you are looking for sale in our residents in real estate process easy to contact us for specific information needed, united states to. -
Lake Worth Lagoon
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................... 1 Park Significance .............................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 7 Park Management Goals .................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................. 8 Public Participation ........................................................................... 9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 15 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................... 15 Natural Resources .......................................................................... 16 Topography ............................................................................... 20 Geology .................................................................................... 21 Soils ......................................................................................... 21 Minerals ................................................................................... -
Orchid Floral Fragrances and Their Niche in Conservation
Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 THE SCENT OF A GHOST Orchid Floral Fragrances and Their Niche in Conservation James J. Sadler WHAT IS FLORAL FRAGRANCE? It is the blend of chemicals emitted by a flower to attract pollinators. These chemicals sometimes cannot be detected by our nose. 1 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 WHY STUDY FLORAL FRAGRANCE? Knowing the floral compounds may help improve measures to attract specific pollinators, increasing pollination and fruit-set to augment conservation. Chemical compounds can be introduced to increase pollinator density. FLORAL FRAGRANCE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION 90 plant families worldwide have been studied for floral fragrance, especially the Orchidaceae6 > 97% of orchid species remain unstudied7 Of all plants studied so far, the 5 most prevalent compounds are: limonene (71%), (E)-β-ocimene (71%), myrcene (70%), linalool (70%), and α-pinene (67%)6 2 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 POSSIBLE POLLINATORS BEES Found to pollinate via mimicry POSSIBLE POLLINATORS WASPS Similar as bees 3 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 POSSIBLE POLLINATORS FLIES Dracula spp. produce a smell similar to fungus where the eggs are laid POSSIBLE POLLINATORS MOTHS Usually white, large and fragrant at night 4 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 CASE STUDY The Ghost Orchid State Endangered1 Dendrophylax lindenii THE GHOST ORCHID Range: S Florida to Cuba Epiphyte of large cypress domes and hardwood hammocks Often affixed to pond apple or pop ash Leafless Flowers May-August 5 Florida -
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
Volume 62 Number 2 25 Aug 2008 ISSN 0024-0966 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society Published quarterly by The Lepidopterists' Society ) ) THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY Executive Council John H. Acorn, President John Lill, Vice President William E. Conner, Immediate Past President David D. Lavvrie, Secretary Andre V.L. Freitas, Vice President Kelly M. Richers, Treasurer Akito Kayvahara, Vice President Members at large: Kim Garwood Richard A. Anderson Michelle DaCosta Kenn Kaufman John V. Calhoun John H. Masters Plarry Zirlin Amanda Roe Michael G. Pogue Editorial Board John W. Rrovvn {Chair) Michael E. Toliver Member at large ( , Brian Scholtens (Journal Lawrence F. Gall ( Memoirs ) 13 ale Clark {News) John A. Snyder {Website) Honorary Life Members of the Society Charles L. Remington (1966), E. G. Munroe (1973), Ian F. B. Common (1987), Lincoln P Brower (1990), Frederick H. Rindge (1997), Ronald W. Hodges (2004) The object of The Lepidopterists’ Society, which was formed in May 1947 and formally constituted in December 1950, is “to pro- mote the science of lepidopterology in all its branches, ... to issue a periodical and other publications on Lepidoptera, to facilitate the exchange of specimens and ideas by both the professional worker and the amateur in the field; to secure cooperation in all mea- sures” directed towards these aims. Membership in the Society is open to all persons interested in the study of Lepidoptera. All members receive the Journal and the News of The Lepidopterists’ Society. Prospective members should send to the Assistant Treasurer full dues for the current year, to- gether with their lull name, address, and special lepidopterological interests. -
Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants: Proceedings of the Fourth
Conservation Implications of Spur Length Variation in Long-Spur Columbines (Aquilegia longissima) CHRISTOPHER J. STUBBEN AND BROOK G. MILLIGAN Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 ABSTRACT: Populations of long-spur columbine (Aquilegia longissima) with spurs 10-16 cm long are known only from a few populations in Texas, a historical collection near Baboquivari Peak, Arizona, and scattered populations in Coahuila, Chihuahua, and Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Populations of yellow columbine with spurs 7-10 cm long are also found in Arizona, Texas, and Mexico, and are now classified as A. longissima in the recent Flora of North America. In a multivariate analysis of floral characters from 11 yellow columbine populations representing a continuous range of spur lengths, populations with spurs 10-16 cm long are clearly separate from other populations based on increasing spur length and decreasing petal and sepal width. The longer-spurred columbines generally flower after monsoon rains in late summer or fall, and occur in intermittently wet canyons and steep slopes in pine-oak forests. Also, longer-spurred flowers can be pollinated by large hawkmoths with tongues 9-15 cm long. Populations with spurs 7-10 cm long cluster with the common golden columbine (A. chrysantha), and may be the result of hybridization between A. chrysantha and A. longissima. Uncertainty about the taxonomic status of intermediates has contributed to a lack of conservation efforts for declining populations of the long-spur columbine. The genus Aquilegia is characterized are difficult to identify accurately in by a wide diversity of floral plant keys. For example, floral spurs morphologies and colors that play a lengths are a key character used to major role in isolating two species via differentiate yellow columbine species in differences in pollinator visitation or the Southwest. -
Peña & Bennett: Annona Arthropods 329 ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED
Peña & Bennett: Annona Arthropods 329 ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED WITH ANNONA SPP. IN THE NEOTROPICS J. E. PEÑA1 AND F. D. BENNETT2 1University of Florida, Tropical Research and Education Center, 18905 S.W. 280th Street, Homestead, FL 33031 2University of Florida, Department of Entomology and Nematology, 970 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611 ABSTRACT Two hundred and ninety-six species of arthropods are associated with Annona spp. The genus Bephratelloides (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) and the species Cerconota anonella (Sepp) (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) are the most serious pests of Annona spp. Host plant and distribution are given for each pest species. Key Words: Annona, arthropods, Insecta. RESUMEN Doscientas noventa y seis especies de arthrópodos están asociadas con Annona spp. en el Neotrópico. De las especies mencionadas, el género Bephratelloides (Hyme- noptera: Eurytomidae) y la especie Cerconota anonella (Sepp) (Lepidoptera: Oecopho- ridae) sobresalen como las plagas mas importantes de Annona spp. Se mencionan las plantas hospederas y la distribución de cada especie. The genus Annona is confined almost entirely to tropical and subtropical America and the Caribbean region (Safford 1914). Edible species include Annona muricata L. (soursop), A. squamosa L. (sugar apple), A. cherimola Mill. (cherimoya), and A. retic- ulata L. (custard apple). Each geographical region has its own distinctive pest fauna, composed of indigenous and introduced species (Bennett & Alam 1985, Brathwaite et al. 1986, Brunner et al. 1975, D’Araujo et al. 1968, Medina-Gaud et al. 1989, Peña et al. 1984, Posada 1989, Venturi 1966). These reports place emphasis on the broader as- pects of pest species. Some recent regional reviews of the status of important pests and their control have been published in Puerto Rico, U.S.A., Colombia, Venezuela, the Caribbean Region and Chile (Medina-Gaud et al. -
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area Partnership And
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area Partnership and Temporary Use of Facilities Proposal [This template is provided to gather basic information to determine eligibility and interest in partnership and temporary use (i.e., the proposed use) of certain facilities within the Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area (ONA). Additional information may be included at an organization’s discretion. To minimize expense the BLM has broken the selection of suitable partnerships and temporary use into two phases. The BLM will determine if a use it suitable and partner eligible base on the information provided below. Upon identifying suitable use and eligible partners, those organizations should prepare Renovation Plans for the facilities to bring them up to a usable standard as required by the BLM and to make the suitable for the proposed use. The information below is required by the BLM no later than close of business on May 11th, 2020.] Organization Name: The Nature Conservancy Basic Contact Information Mailing Address: Blowing Rocks Preserve 574 South Beach Road Hobe Sound, FL 33455 Physical Address (if different): N/A Primary Contact Person: Cristin Krasco Telephone: 772-453-8112 Email: [email protected] Alternative Contact Person: Chris Bergh Telephone: 305-872-7071 Email: [email protected] Proposed Use Units of Interest (Please check all that apply): X Unit F (this is our preferred unit) X Unit G X Unit H X Unit I Proposed Use: [Provide a concise overview of the Proposed Use. Please limit this to the highest level and provide details below] The Nature Conservancy wishes to renovate unit F for the purpose of short-term lodging for visiting Conservancy volunteers, interns, staff, and conservation partners. -
Two Large Tropical Moths (Thynartia Zenobia (Noctuidae) and Cocytiuns
VOLUME 53, NUMBER 3 129 VALLEE, G. & R. BEIQUE. 1979. Degilts d'une bepiaJe et Satyridae) and Burnet moths (Zygaena, Zygaenidae) from susceptihilite des peupliers. Phytoprotection 60:23- 30. temperate environments. In H.V Danks (ed.), Insect life-cycle WAGNER, D. L. & J. ROSOVSKY 1991. Mating systems in primitive polymorphism. Theory, evolution and ecological consequences Lepidopte ra, with emphasis on the reproductive behaviour of for seasonality and diapause control. Kluwer Academic Korscheltellus gracilis (Hepialidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. 378 pp. 102:277- 303. WAGNER, D. L., D. R. TOB!, B. L. PARKER, W. E. WALLNER & J. G. B. CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, 208 - 10422 78 Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, LEONARD. 1989. Immature stages and natural enemies of CANADA T6E lP2, DAVlD D. LAWRIE , .301 - 10556 84 Ave., Korscheltellus gracilis (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Ann. Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA T6E 2H4. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82:717-724. WINN, A. F. 1909. The Hepialidae, or Ghost-moths. Can. Entomol. Received for publication 5 April 1999; revised and accepted 9 41:189-193. December 1999. WU'KI NG, W. & c. MENGELKOCH. 1994. Control of alternate-year flight activities in high-alpine Ringlet butterflies (Erebia, journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 53(3 ), 1999, 129- 130 TWO LARGE TROPICAL MOTHS (THYSANIA ZENOBIA (NOCTUIDAE) AND COCYTlUS ANTAEUS (SPHINGIDAE)) COLONIZE THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS Additional key words: light traps, island colonization. The arrival and establishment of a species OIl an isolated oceanic (kerosene lamps) and collections made by amateur entomologists. island is a relatively rare event. The likelihood of colonization Recently (1989 and 1992), Bernard Landry carried out an intensive depends on a variety of fcatures of the species, including dispersal Lepidoptera survey on the islands but he never collected the species ability, availability of food (hostplants or prey) and ability to (Landry pers. -
Moths: Lepidoptera
Moths: Lepidoptera Vítor O. Becker - Scott E. Miller THE FOLLOWING LIST summarizes identi- Agency, through grants from the Falconwood fications of the so-called Macrolepidoptera Corporation. and pyraloid families from Guana Island. Methods are detailed in Becker and Miller SPHINGIDAE (2002). Data and illustrations for Macrolepi- doptera are provided in Becker and Miller SPHINGINAE (2002). Data for Crambidae and Pyralidae will Agrius cingulatus (Fabricius 1775). United States be provided in Becker and Miller (in prepara- south to Argentina. tion). General, but outdated, background infor- Cocytius antaeus (Drury 1773). Southern United mation on Crambidae and Pyralidae are pro- States to Argentina. vided by Schaus (1940). Data for Pterophoridae Manduca sexta (Linnaeus 1763). Widespread in are provided in Gielis (1992) and Landry and the New World. Gielis (1992). Author and date of description Manduca rustica (Fabricius 1775). Widespread in are given for each species name. Earlier dates the New World. were not always printed on publications; those Manduca brontes (Drury 1773). Antilles north to in square brackets indicate that the year was Central Florida. determined from external sources not the pub- lication itself As in previous lists, authors' MACROGLOSSINAE names are put in parentheses when their Pseudosphinx tetrio (Linnaeus 1771). (See plate generic placement has been revised. Detailed 37.) United States through the Antilles to acknowledgments are provided in Becker and Argentina. Miller (2002), but, in addition, we are espe- Erinnyis alope (Drury 1773). Widespread in the cially grateful to C. Gielis, E.G. Munroe, M. New World. Shaffer, and M. A. Solis for assistance with iden- Erinnyis ello (Linnaeus 1758). Neotropical. -
Appendix I: Critical Erosion Report 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan ______
Appendix I: Critical Erosion Report 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan _______________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX I: Critical Erosion Report _______________________________________________________________________________________ Florida Division of Emergency Management Critically Eroded Beaches In Florida Division of Water Resource Management Florida Department of Environmental Protection August 2016 2600 Blair Stone Rd., MS 3590 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 www.dep.state.fl.us Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida’s erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly sixty-six coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or non-critical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and non-critically eroded. Many areas have significant historic or contemporary erosion conditions, yet the erosion processes do not currently threaten public or private interests. These areas are therefore designated as non-critically eroded areas and require close monitoring in case conditions become critical. This report, originating in 1989, is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available in the updated critical erosion report of 2016 on pages 4 through 20 or refer to the specific county of interest listed