DOCSLIB.ORG

Ws 6-10-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ws 6-10-2020 ANN SPOFFORD KENNETH SCHMITT TOWN OF CARMEL Town Supervisor Town Clerk TOWN HALL SUZANNE MC DONOUGH Town Councilwoman 60 McAlpin Avenue KATHLEEN KRAUS Receiver of Taxes Deputy Supervisor Mahopac, New York 10541 MICHAEL A. BARILE Tel. (845) 628-1500 • Fax (845) 628-6836 Town Councilman www.carmelny.org FRANK D. LOMBARDI Town Councilman MICHAEL SIMONE ROBERT F. SCHANIL, JR. Superintendent of Highways Town Councilman Tel. (845) 628-7474 TOWN BOARD WORK SESSION Wednesday, June 10, 2020 7:00pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - MOMENT OF SILENCE PUBLIC HEARING #1- On the Proposed Amended Increase and Improvement of the Facilities of Carmel Sewer District #1 WWTP 1. Res: Public Interest Order in the Matter of the Increase and Improvement of Facilities of Consolidated Sewer District #1 in the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York (Additional Costs) 2. Res: Authorizing the Issuance of an Additional $291,536 Bonds of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, to Pay Part of the Cost of the Increase and Improvement of the Facilities of Consolidated Sewer District #1 in and for said Town 3. Res: Order Calling Public Hearing in the Matter of the Increase and Improvement of the Facilities of Carmel Water Districts Nos. 2,9 and 14 in the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York (Additional Costs) (July 1, 2020) • Public Comment (Three (3) Minutes on Agenda Items Only) Town Board Work Session: • Review of Town Board Minutes, May 27, and June 3, 2020 1. Supervisor Kenneth Schmitt – Making Permanent Appointment of Senior Office Assistant in the Supervisor’s Office – Joanna Terilli 2. Mary Ann Maxwell, Town Comptroller – Consider Request to award electric supply bids for facilities and street lights for 24 month period commencing November 1, 2020 – October 31, 2022 through joint purchasing bid with Putnam County and other surrounding Towns 3. Lake Casse Park District Advisory Board – Consider Request to Authorize Distribution of Quarterly Newsletter 4. Michael Simone, Highway Superintendent – Consider Request to Declare Equipment/Machinery Old and Obsolete and Authorize Disposal 5. Michael Simone, Highway Superintendent – Consider Request to Authorize Purchase of Bulk Diesel NYS OGS Contract PC68456 (revision to Contract # 23094 9/19/2018) 6. James Gilchrist, Director of Recreation & Parks – Consider Request to Authorize Additional Costs for Engineering Services – Airport Park Phase II ($5,200) 7. James Gilchrist, Director of Recreation & Parks – Consider Request to Authorize Purchase of Soccer and Lacrosse Equipment – Airport Park 8. James Gilchrist, Director of Recreation & Parks – Consider Request to Authorize Payment for the Purchase and Installation of Bathroom Fixtures – McDonough Park 9. Richard Franzetti, PE, Town Engineer – Consider Request to Authorize Awarding of Bid for CSD#1 Main Extension 10. Richard Franzetti, PE, Town Engineer – Consider Request to Refund of Application Fee – Carmel Fire Department 11. Richard Franzetti, PE, Town Engineer- Hazen & Sawyer - Presentation of CWD#2 Water Treatment Plant Upgrade • Public Comment (Three (3) Minutes on Agenda Items Only) • Town Board Member Comments Open Forum: • Public Comments on New Town Related Business (Three (3) Minutes Maximum for Town Residents, Property Owners & Business Owners Only) • Town Board Member Comments • Adjournment Public Hearing #1 (6/10/2020) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TOWN OF CARMEL SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, will conduct a public hearing virtually through the Zoom platform on the 10th day of June, 2020, at 7:00 o’clock PM Prevailing Time, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing upon a certain map, plan and report including an amended estimate of cost prepared in relation to the proposed increase and improvement of the facilities of Carmel Sewer District No. 1 in the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, consisting of the purchase and installation of approximately 450 linear feet of 8 inch sewer line, including three (3) manholes, two (2) service laterals and restoration of NYSDOT right of way, including original furnishings, equipment, machinery, apparatus, appurtenances and incidental improvements and expenses. The new maximum estimated cost of the aforesaid increase and improvement of the facilities of Carmel Sewer District No. 1 in the Town is $461,536, consisting of an increase of $291,536 for such improvements. Public participation will be afforded through Zoom. The particulars will be provided on the Town of Carmel’s website (ci.carmel.ny.us) and bulletin board in advance of the meeting, and email comments may be directed to the Town Board at: [email protected]. The capital project described above has been determined to be a “Type II Action” pursuant to the regulations promulgated under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) which such regulations provide will not result in any significant environmental adverse impacts. The map, plan and report are available in the office of the Town Clerk, where they may be inspected during regular office hours. At said public hearing said Town Board will hear all persons interested in the subject matter thereof. Dated: Mahopac, New York May 21, 2020 BY ORDER OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF CARMEL, PUTNAM COUNTY, NEW YORK ANN SPOFFORD TOWN CLERK RESOLUTION #1 PUBLIC INTEREST ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE INCREASE AND IMPROVEMENT OF FACILITIES OF CONSOLIDATED SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1 IN THE TOWN OF CARMEL, PUTNAM COUNTY, NEW YORK (ADDITIONAL COSTS) WHEREAS, by Orders heretofore adopted, the Town Board of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, authorized an increase and improvement of the facilities of Consolidated Sewer District No. 1, consisting of the purchase and installation of approximately 450 linear feet of 8 inch sewer line, including three (3) manholes, two (2) service laterals and restoration of NYSDOT right of way, including original furnishings, equipment, machinery, apparatus, appurtenances and incidental improvements and expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $170,000; and WHEREAS, by Order dated May 13, 2020, said Town Board called a public hearing on the question of the increase in the maximum estimated cost of said capital project from $170,000 to $461,536 an increase of $291,536; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly published and posted in the manner and within the time provided by law and such public hearing was duly held at the time and place specified in said notice at which all persons interested in the subject matter thereof were duly heard; and WHEREAS, said Town Board has duly considered the evidence given at said public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, by the Town Board of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, as follows: Section 1. Upon the evidence given at the aforesaid public hearing, it is hereby found and determined that it is necessary and in the public interest to increase and improve the facilities of Consolidated Sewer District No. 1, in the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, in the manner described in the preambles hereof, at a new maximum estimated cost of $461,536 and said increase and improvement is hereby authorized and approved.. Section 2. This Order shall take effect immediately. Resolution Offered by: _______________________ Seconded by:_______________________ Roll Call Vote YES NO Robert Schanil ___ ___ Michael Barile ___ ___ Frank Lombardi ___ ___ Suzanne McDonough ___ ___ Kenneth Schmitt ___ ___ RESOLUTION #2 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF AN ADDITIONAL $291,536 BONDS OF THE TOWN OF CARMEL, PUTNAM COUNTY, NEW YORK, TO PAY PART OF THE COST OF THE INCREASE AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE FACILITIES OF CONSOLIDATED SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1 IN AND FOR SAID TOWN. WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, on August 15, 2018, duly adopted a bond resolution authorizing the issuance of $170,000 serial bonds of said Town to pay the cost of the increase and improvement of Consolidated Sewer District No. 1, in and for the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, consisting of the purchase and installation of approximately 450 linear feet of 8 inch sewer line, including three (3) manholes, two (2) service laterals and restoration of NYSDOT right of way, including original furnishings, equipment, machinery, apparatus, appurtenances and incidental improvements and expenses in connection therewith, and WHEREAS, said project has been determined to be a “Type II Action” pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), the implementation of which as proposed, such regulations provide will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, it has now been determined that the maximum estimated cost of such class of objects or purposes is $461,536, an increase of $291,536 over that previously authorized; and WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the issuance of an additional $291,536 bonds of said Town for such specific object or purpose to pay a portion of the cost thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, as follows: Section 1. For the specific object or purpose of paying additional costs of the increase and improvement of Consolidated Sewer District No. 1, in and for said Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, consisting of the purchase and installation of approximately 450 linear feet of 8 inch sewer line, including three (3) manholes, two (2) service laterals and restoration of NYSDOT right of way, including original furnishings, equipment, machinery, apparatus, appurtenances and incidental improvements and expenses in connection therewith, there are hereby authorized to be issued an additional $291,536 bonds of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pesticide and Fertilizer Technical Working Group Final Report
    Pesticide and Fertilizer Technical Working Group Final Report Prepared by the Pesticide and Fertilizer Technical Working Group As established under the NYC Watershed Memorandum of Agreement September 28, 2000 New York City Watershed Pesticide and Fertilizer Technical Working Group Final Report Pesticide and Fertilizer Technical Working Group Goal and Objectives Goal Purposes Background Memorandum of Agreement Working Group Members Issue: Nonagricultural Fertilizer Use Findings Recommendations Issue: Nonagricultural Pesticide Use Findings Existing Pesticide Regulations Principal Users of Pesticides Within the Watershed Recommendations Issue: Agricultural Fertilizer Use Findings Monitoring and Modeling Efforts Watershed Agricultural Programs Delaware Comprehensive Strategy Recommendations Issue: Agricultural Use of Pesticides Findings Recommendations Monitoring and Data Collection Needs for Urban Fertilizers and Pesticides Phosphorous Use Pesticides Objectives of Monitoring and Data Collection Need for Fertilizers and Pesticides Table 1. Delaware District Pesticide Monitoring Site Locations Table 2. DEP Keypoint Pesticide Monitoring Site Locations Pesticide and Fertilizer Technical Working Group Goal and Purposes Goal The overall goal of the New York City Watershed Pesticide and Fertilizer Working Group was to report and make recommendations for pesticides and nutrients based on a critical and comprehensive review of their management, use and environmental fate. It is recognized that the review and recommendations of
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Water Story
    New York City’s Water Story: From Mountain Top to Tap SCHOHARIE COUNTY Schoharie Reservoir 1,130 FEET Delaware Watershed Gilboa Catskill Watershed Stamford The water we use today is the same water that fell as C rain when dinosaurs roamed a D t Prattsville Siuslaw s DELAWARE COUNTY West Branch Delaware e k l i the earth. In its endless a l Windham l w a W r cycle, water is the only e a t W e GREENE COUNTY rs Schoharie Creek substance that naturally a h te e r d Grand Gorge sh exists as a solid, e d liquid or gas. Delhi Lenox Roxbury East Branch Delaware Hunter Tannersville Andes Walton HUNTER MOUNTAIN Water’s journey from 4,040 FEET mountain top to tap begins Margaretville Shandaken Tunnel when rain and snow fall on COLUMBIA COUNTY watersheds, the areas Massachusetts of land that catch, absorb, Downsville Phoenicia and carry water downhill to gently and swiftly Deposit Pepacton Woodstock flowing streams. Cannonsville Reservoir Reservoir 1,150 FEET 1,280 FEET Esopus Creek SLIDE MOUNTAIN Boiceville West Delaware Tunnel East Delaware Tunnel 4,180 FEET Streams provide life-cycle Neversink Frost Valley needs for fish and other RIver aquatic organisms. Oxygen is Ashokan Rondout trapped in the fresh water as Creek Reservoir Claryville Olivebridge 590 FEET Kingston it tumbles over rocks into deep pools. Overhanging tree branches keep water r C e A v cool as fresh water T i Grahamsville S K R DUTCHESS COUNTY continues its journey. IL L n Neversink A Neversink Reservoir Tunnel Q o s 1,440 FEET U s E d Liberty Rondout Reservoir d Water is naturally filtered D u u U 840 FEET U C C H H T by the soil and tree roots in T dense forests as it travels toward reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Water Quality
    Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ v List of Figures....................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................... xi Errata Sheet Issued May 4, 2011 .......................................................................................... xiii 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 What is the purpose and scope of this report? ......................................................... 1 1.2 What constitutes the New York City water supply system? ................................... 1 1.3 What are the objectives of water quality monitoring and how are the sampling programs organized? ........................................................................... 3 1.4 What types of monitoring networks are used to provide coverage of such a large watershed? .................................................................................................. 5 1.5 How do the different monitoring efforts complement each other? .......................... 9 1.6 How many water samples did DEP collect
    [Show full text]
  • Ashokan Rail Trail Opening This Fall
    Subject: Watershed Recreation News & Events From: "New York City DEP Recreation" <[email protected]> Sent: 4/26/2019 4:22:18 PM To: [email protected]; Bureau of Water Supply Natural Resources Division Above: Ulster County works to remove the old railroad trestle across the Esopus Creek that was destroyed during tropical storms Irene and Lee. The bridge, near Boiceville, will be replaced with a new structure that will be part of the Ashokan Rail Trail. Ashokan Rail Trail ­ Opening this fall Ulster County's construction crews are back at work on the Ashokan Rail Trail after a short break for winter. This year, along with work on the trail, contractors will remove the old railroad trestle over the Esopus Creek that was destroyed by tropical storms Irene and Lee (photo above). The trestle will be replaced by a bridge to carry the rail trail over the creek. The first half of the Ashokan Rail Trail, from Basin Road to the hamlet of Ashokan, is expected to open in the fall of this year. The remaining section, from Ashokan to Route 28A near Boiceville, is planned to be completed in early 2020. Trailheads will be constructed at the eastern end of the trail and at a central location near the former Ashokan Station site. A temporary parking area will be constructed near the western end of the trail. A more permanent trailhead on the western end will be constructed off Route 28 in Boiceville as part of DEP's work to replace the five­arch bridge that spans the Esopus Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Southern New York Fishing Derby April Winners List
    2017 Southern New York Fishing Derby April Winners List Largest Brown Trout (20” Minimum First Prize $50 – Lukasz Rzezwicki – Putnam Valley 11lb 1 oz. – 28” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 4/2/17 Honorable Mention David Stuckert – Lincolndale – 8lb – 27 3/16” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 4/16/17 Richard DeGran – Kerhonkson – 7lb 13 oz. – 26 ½” – Ashokan Reservoir – 4/27/17 *James O’Connor (15) – Carmel – 7lb 8 oz. – 25 ½” – Lake Gleneida – 4/15/17 Bill Weizenecker – Carmel – 7lb 7 oz. – 26” – Kensico Reservoir – 4/16/17 Krzysztof Jurkiewicz – Spotswood, NJ – 7lb 2 oz. – 25” – West Branch Reservoir – 4/14/17 Kitman Ma – Bayside – 6lb 8 oz. – 23” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 4/9/17 Krzysztof, Jurkiewicz – Spotswood, NJ - 6lb 8 oz. – 23 ½” – Cross River Reservoir – 4/9/17 Melissa Baumann – Carmel – 6lb 2 oz. – 28” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 4/15/17 Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 5lb 14 oz. – 22” – Muscoot Reservoir – 4/1/17 Irving Buley – Grahamsville – 5lb 7 oz. – 22” – Rondout Reservoir – 4/11/17 Delawie Hoffman (10) – Grahamsville – 3lb 7 oz. – 20 ¼” – Neversink Reservoir – 4/11/17 Largest Lake Trout (24” Minimum) First Prize $50 – Mike Zatloukal – Carmel 13lb 8 oz. – 35” – Lake Gleneida – 4/16/17 Honorable Mention Jack Stewart – Carmel – 9lb 9 oz. – 29 ½” – Lake Gleneida – 4/16/17 Richard Chiavelli – Hopewell Junction – 8lb 9 oz. – 30” – Rondout Reservoir – 4/18/17 Ryan Olson – Carmel – 8lb 2 oz. – 28” – Lake Gleneida – 4/23/17 Jack Stewart – Carmel – 8lb 2 oz. – 28” – Lake Gilead – 4/30/17 Robert Haddad – Carmel – 7lb 9 oz. – 25 ½” – Lake Gilead – 4/30/17 Vladimir Nigrovic – Croton on Hudson – 7lb 4 oz.
    [Show full text]
  • Croton Watershed Catskill Watershed Delaware Watershed
    New York City’s Water Story: From Mountain Top to Tap SCHOHARIE COUNTY Schoharie Reservoir 1,130 FEET Delaware Watershed Gilboa Catskill Watershed Stamford The water we use today is the same water that fell as C rain when dinosaurs roamed a D t Prattsville Siuslaw s DELAWARE COUNTY West Branch Delaware e k l i the earth. In its endless a l Windham l w a W r cycle, water is the only e a t W e GREENE COUNTY rs Schoharie Creek substance that naturally a h te e r d Grand Gorge sh exists as a solid, e d liquid or gas. Delhi Lenox Roxbury East Branch Delaware Hunter Tannersville Andes Walton HUNTER MOUNTAIN Water’s journey from 4,040 FEET mountain top to tap begins Margaretville Shandaken Tunnel when rain and snow fall on COLUMBIA COUNTY watersheds, the areas Massachusetts of land that catch, absorb, Downsville Phoenicia and carry water downhill to gently and swiftly Deposit Pepacton Woodstock flowing streams. Cannonsville Reservoir Reservoir 1,150 FEET 1,280 FEET Esopus Creek SLIDE MOUNTAIN Boiceville West Delaware Tunnel East Delaware Tunnel 4,180 FEET Streams provide life-cycle Neversink Frost Valley needs for fish and other RIver aquatic organisms. Oxygen is Ashokan Rondout trapped in the fresh water as Creek Reservoir Claryville Olivebridge 590 FEET Kingston it tumbles over rocks into deep pools. Overhanging tree branches keep water r C e A v cool as fresh water T i Grahamsville S K R DUTCHESS COUNTY continues its journey. IL L n Neversink A Neversink Reservoir Tunnel Q o s 1,440 FEET U s E d Liberty Rondout Reservoir d Water is naturally filtered D u u U 840 FEET U C C H H T by the soil and tree roots in T dense forests as it travels toward reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW in NEW YORK the Effect of the New York
    Developments in Federal and State Law ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN NEW YORK MATTHEW ARNOLD & PORTER BENDER Volume 9, No. 6 June 1998 The Effect of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Regulations On Land Use by Heather Marie Andrade I. INTRODUCTION substances and wastes, radioactive material, petroleum products, pesticides, fertilizers and winter highway maintenance materi- The New York City Department of Environmental Protection als.7 The design, construction and operation of wastewater (DEP) Watershed Rules and Regulations became effective on treatment plants, sewerage systems and service connections, May 1, 1997. The Regulations were promulgated by New York (continued on page 88) City to avoid filtration of and to prevent the contamination, degradation and pollution of the City's water supply' pursuant to the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)2 and the 1989 IN THIS ISSUE Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR).3 The DEP obtained the authority to regulate activities affecting its watershed, but UPDATE outside of its political boundaries, from section 1100 (I) of the ♦ Correction 82 New York Public Health Law.4 This section grants power to LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS the State Department of Health (DOH) throughout the state, and ♦ Asbestos 82 the city DEP (upon approval by the DOH) throughout the New ♦ Hazardous Substances 82 York City water supply region, to promulgate and enforce rules ♦ Insurance 83 ♦ that protect watersheds within their respective jurisdictions.5 Land Use 83 ♦ Lead 84 The boundaries of the New York City watershed encompass ♦ Mining 84 areas east of the Hudson in Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess ♦ SEQRA/NEPA 84 Counties and west of the Hudson in Delaware, Schoharie, ♦ Water 85 Greene, Sullivan and Ulster Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure and Tectonics of the Hudson Highlands, New York Nicholas M
    NYSGA 2009 Trip 9 - Ratcliffe and Aleinikoff Trip 9 - Ratcliffe and Aleinikoff Pre-Ottawan (1.09 Ga) Infrastructure and Tectonics of the Hudson Highlands, New York Nicholas M. Ratcliffe1 and John N. Aleinikoff2 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston VA 20192, [email protected] 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, [email protected] INTRODUCTION This trip focuses on some of the oldest Mesoproterozic rocks in the Appalachians and the nature of the pre-Ottawan (pre-1.09 Ga) infrastructure of the Hudson Highlands and Manhattan Prong. Zircon geochronology by Aleinikoff (Table 1) is revised from that given in Table 1 of Ratcliffe and Aleinikoff (2008) and is still preliminary. Ongoing geologic mapping east of the Hudson River in the Peekskill, West Point, Lake Carmel, Mohegan Lake, Brewster and Peach Lake quadrangles continues to lead to a reinterpretation and clarification of our former views (Ratcliffe and Aleinikoff, 2001, 2008) as well a new synthesis for the Hudson Highlands east of the Hudson River. After publish- ing the detailed geology of the Poughquag quadrangle (Ratcliffe and Burton, 1990) and the Oscawana Lake quad- rangle (Ratcliffe, 1992), investigations were resumed in 2000 to prepare the previously mapped but unpublished quadrangles for publication. This trip presents, in preliminary form, much of the recent, (post-2000) information, which helps clarify the age and distribution of Mesoproterozoic basement rocks of the Hudson Highlands and Manhattan Prong and is an abbrevi- ated version of our 2008 NEIGC trip. Please note that stops have been changed and that the route is different. A remarkable newly recognized aspect of Hudson Highlands geology covered in this trip is the widespread presence of orthogneisses and metavolcanic rocks belonging to the time period between 1400 Ma and 1200 Ma, or during Geochrons 14 and 13 of Rivers (1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Series 252 NYC Watershed Proceedings – Alphabetical Listing
    Westchester County Archives Series 252 2199 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523 NYC Watershed Proceedings – Alphabetical Listing (914) 231-1500 1877‐1919 ITEM DATE CALL NUMBER Brewster, Lake Gleneida, Farmers Mills, 1894‐1899 A‐0070 (26) White Pond Byram 1899‐1907 A‐0070 (1) Byram 1899‐1907 A‐0070 (2) Carmel, Lake Gleneida 1906 A‐0070 (27) Catskill Aqueduct 1907‐1910 A‐0070 (29) Cornell Dam 1896‐1909 A‐0070 (12) Cornell Dam 1896‐1909 A‐0070 (13) Cornell Dam 1896‐1909 A‐0070 (14) Cornell Dam 1896‐1909 A‐0070 (15) Cross River Dam and Reservoir 1809‐1910 A‐0070 (32) Cross River Dam and Reservoir 1809‐1910 A‐0070 (33) Croton Aqueduct 1884‐1890 A‐0070 (16) Croton Aqueduct 1884‐1890 A‐0070 (17) Croton Aqueduct 1884‐1890 A‐0070 (18) Croton Falls Dam and Reservoir 1906‐1910 A‐0070 (31) Farmers Mills, White Pond and Carmel 1896‐1904 A‐0070 (25) Hill View Reservoir 1908‐1917 A‐0070 (30) Westchester County Archives Series 252 2199 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523 NYC Watershed Proceedings – Alphabetical Listing (914) 231-1500 1877‐1919 ITEM DATE CALL NUMBER Jerome Park 1895‐1898 A‐0070 (28) Kensico Reservoir 1893‐1910 A‐0070 (3) Kensico Reservoir 1893‐1910 A‐0070 (4) Kensico Reservoir 1893‐1910 A‐0070 (5) Kensico Reservoir 1893‐1910 A‐0070 (6) Kensico Reservoir 1893‐1910 A‐0070 (7)S (J5) Lake Kirk, Lake Mahopac and Muscoot River 1879 A‐0070 (24) Mount Kisco – Sanitary Protection and 1893‐1901 A‐0070 (10) Lands to be acquired Patterson and Brewster 1899‐1900 A‐0070 (23) Pipeline, Kensico and Rye Pond Reservoirs 1881‐1903 A‐0070
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Phosphorus in Lake Carmel Final
    Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Phosphorus in Lake Carmel Putnam County, New York July 2016 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 290 Broadway New York, NY 10007 Prepared by: NYSDEC Division of Water Bureau of Water Resource Management TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................4 1.1. Background .....................................................................................................................................4 1.2. Problem Statement ........................................................................................................................4 2.0 WATERSHED AND LAKE CHARACTERIZATION ......................................................................5 2.1. Watershed Characterization .........................................................................................................5 2.2. Lake Morphometry ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Water Quality .............................................................................................................................. 11 3.0 NUMERIC WATER QUALITY TARGET ..................................................................................... 12 4.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 12 4.1. Models used to Analyze Phosphorus Contributions
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Carmel TMDL EPA Approval Letter (PDF)
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 2 290 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NY 10007-1866 SEP 2 0 2016 Mr. Mark Klotz, Director Division of Water, 4th Floor New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-3500 Dear Mr. Klotz: On September 2, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, received for review and approval, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's document, dated July 2016: "Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Phosphorus in Lake Carmel, Putnam County, New York." The EPA approves this TMDL pursuant to Section 303(d)(2) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR 130.7(d)(2). The rationale for this approval is provided in the enclosure entitled "Review of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Total Phosphorus for Lake Carmel, New York." The TMDL addresses the total phosphorus loading and impairment in this waterbody and is established at a level sufficient to attain the NYSDEC's water quality guidance value for total phosphorus for Lake Carmel. The EPA expects this approved TMDL will be incorporated in the New York State Water Quality Management Plan. Sincerely, Q~ C, ~< ~!avier Laureano, Director Clean Water Division Enclosure Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 50% Postconsumer content) Review of Total Maximum D~ily Load (TMDL) for Total Phosphorus for Lake Carmel, New York This document contains EPA's review of the above-referenced TMDL. This TMDL review document includes TMDL review guidelines that summarize and provide guidance regarding currently effective statutory and regulatory requirements relating to TMDLs.
    [Show full text]