The Genetic Aetiology of Otosclerosis in the Population of Newfoundland and Labrador

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Genetic Aetiology of Otosclerosis in the Population of Newfoundland and Labrador The Genetic Aetiology of Otosclerosis in the Population of Newfoundland and Labrador By © Nelly Abdelfatah A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Discipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Memorial University of Newfoundland Oct, 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador Abstract Background Otosclerosis is a common form of conductive and mixed hearing loss in Caucasian populations, with an estimated prevalence of 0.3-0.4%. Since 1998, eight loci have been mapped to otosclerosis in families with apparent autosomal dominant (AD) otosclerosis but none of the causative genes have been identified. Objective As no otosclerosis gene has yet been identified, the main objective of this thesis was to identify otosclerosis-disease causing genes by studying Newfoundland (NL) families. Methods Families with familial otosclerosis were identified and chracterized clinically. Those which fit the diagnostic criteria for otosclerosis were recurited for this study. Molecular genetic analyses of these families were carried out by genotyping, haplotyping, Sanger sequencing of candidate genes in linked regions and exome sequencing. Results One Family (2081) was solved through identification of a pathogenic variant (FOXL1c.976_990hetdel) in the FOXL1 gene at chromosome (Chr) 16q that was present in all affected individuals. The 15 base pair (bp) deletion was also identified in a second family from Ontario (ON) and the possible pathways involving FOXL1 in the pathogenesis of otosclerosis were suggested. In the second otosclerosis family, three II candidate variants were identified through exome sequencing of the candidate regions under a dominant model. Conclusion I have identified the first otosclerosis gene, FOXL1, a transcription factor involved in the disease pathogenicity. I also identified three possible candidate mutations for a second otosclerosis family. This finding will have a major impact on molecular genetic studies of other otosclerosis families and it will allows for genetic counselling and the possibility for gene therapies in the future. III Acknowledgments First, I would like to take this opportunity to thank my supervisor Dr. Terry Lynn Young for her generosity, support, guidance, teaching and patience. Words are not enough to thank her. When I came to her lab, I had a little experience in experimental design, critical thinking and scientific writing. Dr. Terry Young taught me how to be a great scientist. Thank you for believing in me and giving me the opportunity of my life. Thanks to my supervisory committee, Drs Kathy Hodgkinson, Jane Green and Ban Younghusband for their encouragement, guidance and helpful advice throughout the completion of my project. Thanks to The Young Lab, for being great, supportive and amazing co-workers. Special thanks to Dante Galutira and Jim Houston for your help and assistance, and for your patience and generosity. Thank you Tammy Benteau and Catherine Street for your support. Thank you Nancy Merner and Annika Haywood for being valuable members of the lab, and for your help and support. I spent a great and enjoyable time working with Lance Doucette and I wish that we could continue working with each other. Thank you David McComiskey, Jessica Squires, Cindy Penney and Andrew Bullen for being excellent peers and making learning fun. Special thanks for Jim Houston, Dante Galutira and Tammy Benteau for editing my thesis. I would like to thank Genome Canada (Atlantic Medical Genetics and Genomics Initiative), CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research), RDC NL (Research & IV Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador) and Memorial University Graduate Studies for funding. Also I would like to thank CIHR, RDC NL for my fellowship. I would like to thank the Journals: European Journal of Human Genetics and Human Mutation for publishing my two papers. I dedicate this work to my lovely Mom for her support, love and concern from abroad and in memory of my beloved Dad. Thank you to my husband Ahmed Mostafa for his continued support, help and encouragement. Without your support, I would not be able to finish my PhD. Thank you to my lovely adorable kids, Marwan and Merna, for your understanding that Mom is busy; for your laughter, love, support and encouragement which gave me the energy to continue. V Table of Contents The Genetic Aetiology of Otosclerosis in the Population of Newfoundland and Labrador ............................................................................................................................. I Abstract .............................................................................................................................. II Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... IV List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... X List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... XI Chapter 1: General introduction...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the study and significance .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Anatomy and function of the ear ........................................................................................ 2 1.3 How sound is transmitted..................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Hearing loss… ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.4.1 Classification of hearing loss ............................................................................................... 5 1.5 Gene discovery in non-syndromic hearing loss using NL families ..................... 12 1.5.1 Ascertainment of families ................................................................................................... 12 1.5.2 Complications of family ascertainment......................................................................... 15 1.5.2.1 Penetrance………. ................................................................................................................... 15 1.5.2.2 Variable expression .............................................................................................................. 16 1.5.2.3 Phenocopy……….. ................................................................................................................... 17 1.5.3 Genetic analysis of families with hearing loss ........................................................... 17 1.5.3.1 Exclusion of known loci or genes .................................................................................... 18 1.5.3.2 Candidate gene and genome-wide association approaches ................................. 18 1.5.3.3 Genome-wide linkage analysis ......................................................................................... 20 1.5.3.4 Positional candidate gene sequencing .......................................................................... 25 1.5.3.5 Mutation identification and validation ......................................................................... 26 1.5.3.6 Next generation sequencing.............................................................................................. 30 1.6 Otosclerosis…. .......................................................................................................................... 32 1.6.1 Overview……….. ...................................................................................................................... 32 1.6.2 Bone remodeling and otic capsule .................................................................................. 35 1.6.3 History and stages of otosclerosis ................................................................................... 38 1.6.4 Diagnosis of otosclerosis..................................................................................................... 40 1.6.5 Genetic causes of otosclerosis........................................................................................... 44 1.7 Founder population ............................................................................................................... 51 1.8 The NL population ................................................................................................................. 51 1.8.1 Gene discovery in the NL population ............................................................................. 52 VI 1.9 Hypothesis and objectives .................................................................................................. 53 1.10 Co-authorship statement .................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 2: Test for linkage of NL Families to published OTSC loci and associated candidate genes…………. ........................................................................................ 55 2.1 Introduction… .......................................................................................................................... 56 2.2 Subjects and methods ........................................................................................................... 56 2.2.1 Working definition of clinical
Recommended publications
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress As Target for Treatment of Hearing Loss
    REVIEW ARTICLE Endoplasmic reticulum stress as target for treatment of hearing loss Yanfei WANG, Zhigang XU* Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China *Correspondence: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.37175/stemedicine.v1i3.21 ABSTRACT The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) plays pivotal roles in coordinating protein biosynthesis and processing. Under ER stress, when excessive misfolded or unfolded proteins are accumulated in the ER, the unfolded protein response (UPR) is activated. The UPR blocks global protein synthesis while activates chaperone expression, eventually leading to the alleviation of ER stress. However, prolonged UPR induces cell death. ER stress has been associated with various types of diseases. Recently, increasing evidences suggest that ER stress and UPR are also involved in hearing loss. In the present review, we will discuss the role of ER stress in hereditary hearing loss as well as acquired hearing loss. Moreover, we will discuss the emerging ER stress-based treatment of hearing loss. Further investigations are warranted to understand the mechanisms in detail how ER stress contributes to hearing loss, which will help us develop better ER stress-related treatments. Keywords: ER stress · Unfolded protein response (UPR) · Hearing loss · Inner ear · Cochlea 1. Introduction far, which are mediated by ER stress sensors that reside The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a highly dynamic on the ER membranes, namely the inositol-requiring organelle in eukaryotic cells, playing important roles in enzyme 1α (IRE1α), the PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), protein synthesis, processing, folding, and transportation, and the activating transcription factor 6α (ATF6α) as well as lipid synthesis and calcium homeostasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Figure 1. Vimentin
    Double mutant specific genes Transcript gene_assignment Gene Symbol RefSeq FDR Fold- FDR Fold- FDR Fold- ID (single vs. Change (double Change (double Change wt) (single vs. wt) (double vs. single) (double vs. wt) vs. wt) vs. single) 10485013 BC085239 // 1110051M20Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1110051M20 gene // 2 E1 // 228356 /// NM 1110051M20Ri BC085239 0.164013 -1.38517 0.0345128 -2.24228 0.154535 -1.61877 k 10358717 NM_197990 // 1700025G04Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1700025G04 gene // 1 G2 // 69399 /// BC 1700025G04Rik NM_197990 0.142593 -1.37878 0.0212926 -3.13385 0.093068 -2.27291 10358713 NM_197990 // 1700025G04Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1700025G04 gene // 1 G2 // 69399 1700025G04Rik NM_197990 0.0655213 -1.71563 0.0222468 -2.32498 0.166843 -1.35517 10481312 NM_027283 // 1700026L06Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1700026L06 gene // 2 A3 // 69987 /// EN 1700026L06Rik NM_027283 0.0503754 -1.46385 0.0140999 -2.19537 0.0825609 -1.49972 10351465 BC150846 // 1700084C01Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1700084C01 gene // 1 H3 // 78465 /// NM_ 1700084C01Rik BC150846 0.107391 -1.5916 0.0385418 -2.05801 0.295457 -1.29305 10569654 AK007416 // 1810010D01Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1810010D01 gene // 7 F5 // 381935 /// XR 1810010D01Rik AK007416 0.145576 1.69432 0.0476957 2.51662 0.288571 1.48533 10508883 NM_001083916 // 1810019J16Rik // RIKEN cDNA 1810019J16 gene // 4 D2.3 // 69073 / 1810019J16Rik NM_001083916 0.0533206 1.57139 0.0145433 2.56417 0.0836674 1.63179 10585282 ENSMUST00000050829 // 2010007H06Rik // RIKEN cDNA 2010007H06 gene // --- // 6984 2010007H06Rik ENSMUST00000050829 0.129914 -1.71998 0.0434862 -2.51672
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations in the WFS1 Gene Are a Frequent Cause of Autosomal Dominant Nonsyndromic Low-Frequency Hearing Loss in Japanese
    J Hum Genet (2007) 52:510–515 DOI 10.1007/s10038-007-0144-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mutations in the WFS1 gene are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic low-frequency hearing loss in Japanese Hisakuni Fukuoka Æ Yukihiko Kanda Æ Shuji Ohta Æ Shin-ichi Usami Received: 14 January 2007 / Accepted: 27 March 2007 / Published online: 11 May 2007 Ó The Japan Society of Human Genetics and Springer 2007 Abstract Mutations in WFS1 are reported to be respon- sites are likely to be mutational hot spots. All three families sible for two conditions with distinct phenotypes; DFNA6/ with WFS1 mutations in this study showed a similar phe- 14/38 and autosomal recessive Wolfram syndrome. They notype, LFSNHL, as in previous reports. In this study, one- differ in their associated symptoms and inheritance mode, third (three out of nine) autosomal dominant LFSNHL and although their most common clinical symptom is families had mutations in the WFS1 gene, indicating that in hearing loss, it is of different types. While DNFA6/14/38 is non-syndromic hearing loss WFS1 is restrictively and characterized by low frequency sensorineural hearing loss commonly found within autosomal dominant LFSNHL (LFSNHL), in contrast, Wolfram syndrome is associated families. with various hearing severities ranging from normal to profound hearing loss that is dissimilar to LFSNHL (Pen- Keywords WSF1 Á Low-frequency hearing loss Á nings et al. 2002). To confirm whether within non-syn- DFNA6/14/38 dromic hearing loss patients WFS1 mutations are found restrictively in patients with LFSNHL and to summarize the mutation spectrum of WFS1 found in Japanese, we Introduction screened 206 Japanese autosomal dominant and 64 auto- somal recessive (sporadic) non-syndromic hearing loss WFS1 is a gene encoding an 890 amino-acid glycoprotein probands with various severities of hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Fumihiko Urano: Wolfram Syndrome: Diagnosis, Management, And
    Curr Diab Rep (2016) 16:6 DOI 10.1007/s11892-015-0702-6 OTHER FORMS OF DIABETES (JJ NOLAN, SECTION EDITOR) Wolfram Syndrome: Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment Fumihiko Urano1,2 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Wolfram syndrome is a rare genetic disorder char- diabetes insipidus, optic nerve atrophy, hearing loss, and acterized by juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus, diabetes neurodegeneration. It was first reported in 1938 by Wol- insipidus, optic nerve atrophy, hearing loss, and neurodegen- fram and Wagener who found four of eight siblings with eration. Although there are currently no effective treatments juvenile diabetes mellitus and optic nerve atrophy [1]. that can delay or reverse the progression of Wolfram syn- Wolfram syndrome is considered a rare disease and esti- drome, the use of careful clinical monitoring and supportive mated to afflict about 1 in 160,000–770,000 [2, 3]. In care can help relieve the suffering of patients and improve 1995, Barrett, Bundey, and Macleod described detailed their quality of life. The prognosis of this syndrome is current- clinical features of 45 patients with Wolfram syndrome ly poor, and many patients die prematurely with severe neu- and determined the best available diagnostic criteria for rological disabilities, raising the urgency for developing novel the disease [3]. According to the draft International Clas- treatments for Wolfram syndrome. In this article, we describe sification of Diseases (ICD-11), Wolfram Syndrome is natural history and etiology, provide recommendations for categorized as a rare specified diabetes mellitus (subcate- diagnosis and clinical management, and introduce new treat- gory 5A16.1, Wolfram Syndrome).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino-Like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2006 Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino-like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene Yutao Liu University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Liu, Yutao, "Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino- like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1824 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Yutao Liu entitled "Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino-like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Life Sciences. Brynn H. Voy, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Naima Moustaid-Moussa, Yisong Wang, Rogert Hettich Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dogan Phdthesis Final.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Eberly College of Science ELUCIDATING BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF GENOMIC DNA WITH ROBUST SIGNALS OF BIOCHEMICAL ACTIVITY: INTEGRATIVE GENOME-WIDE STUDIES OF ENHANCERS A Dissertation in Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology by Nergiz Dogan © 2014 Nergiz Dogan Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2014 ii The dissertation of Nergiz Dogan was reviewed and approved* by the following: Ross C. Hardison T. Ming Chu Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee David S. Gilmour Professor of Molecular and Cell Biology Anton Nekrutenko Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Robert F. Paulson Professor of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Philip Reno Assistant Professor of Antropology Scott B. Selleck Professor and Head of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Genome-wide measurements of epigenetic features such as histone modifications, occupancy by transcription factors and coactivators provide the opportunity to understand more globally how genes are regulated. While much effort is being put into integrating the marks from various combinations of features, the contribution of each feature to accuracy of enhancer prediction is not known. We began with predictions of 4,915 candidate erythroid enhancers based on genomic occupancy by TAL1, a key hematopoietic transcription factor that is strongly associated with gene induction in erythroid cells. Seventy of these DNA segments occupied by TAL1 (TAL1 OSs) were tested by transient transfections of cultured hematopoietic cells, and 56% of these were active as enhancers. Sixty-six TAL1 OSs were evaluated in transgenic mouse embryos, and 65% of these were active enhancers in various tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Otosclerosis
    A molecular and genetic analysis of otosclerosis Joanna Lauren Ziff Submitted for the degree of PhD University College London January 2014 1 Declaration I, Joanna Ziff, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Where work has been conducted by other members of our laboratory, this has been indicated by an appropriate reference. 2 Abstract Otosclerosis is a common form of conductive hearing loss. It is characterised by abnormal bone remodelling within the otic capsule, leading to formation of sclerotic lesions of the temporal bone. Encroachment of these lesions on to the footplate of the stapes in the middle ear leads to stapes fixation and subsequent conductive hearing loss. The hereditary nature of otosclerosis has long been recognised due to its recurrence within families, but its genetic aetiology is yet to be characterised. Although many familial linkage studies and candidate gene association studies to investigate the genetic nature of otosclerosis have been performed in recent years, progress in identifying disease causing genes has been slow. This is largely due to the highly heterogeneous nature of this condition. The research presented in this thesis examines the molecular and genetic basis of otosclerosis using two next generation sequencing technologies; RNA-sequencing and Whole Exome Sequencing. RNA–sequencing has provided human stapes transcriptomes for healthy and diseased stapes, and in combination with pathway analysis has helped identify genes and molecular processes dysregulated in otosclerotic tissue. Whole Exome Sequencing has been employed to investigate rare variants that segregate with otosclerosis in affected families, and has been followed by a variant filtering strategy, which has prioritised genes found to be dysregulated during RNA-sequencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Identities in Evs Isolated from U87-MG GBM Cells As Determined by NG LC-MS/MS
    Protein identities in EVs isolated from U87-MG GBM cells as determined by NG LC-MS/MS. No. Accession Description Σ Coverage Σ# Proteins Σ# Unique Peptides Σ# Peptides Σ# PSMs # AAs MW [kDa] calc. pI 1 A8MS94 Putative golgin subfamily A member 2-like protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens PE=5 SV=2 - [GG2L5_HUMAN] 100 1 1 7 88 110 12,03704523 5,681152344 2 P60660 Myosin light polypeptide 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MYL6 PE=1 SV=2 - [MYL6_HUMAN] 100 3 5 17 173 151 16,91913397 4,652832031 3 Q6ZYL4 General transcription factor IIH subunit 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GTF2H5 PE=1 SV=1 - [TF2H5_HUMAN] 98,59 1 1 4 13 71 8,048185945 4,652832031 4 P60709 Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 - [ACTB_HUMAN] 97,6 5 5 35 917 375 41,70973209 5,478027344 5 P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=RNH1 PE=1 SV=2 - [RINI_HUMAN] 96,75 1 12 37 173 461 49,94108966 4,817871094 6 P09382 Galectin-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LGALS1 PE=1 SV=2 - [LEG1_HUMAN] 96,3 1 7 14 283 135 14,70620005 5,503417969 7 P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TPI1 PE=1 SV=3 - [TPIS_HUMAN] 95,1 3 16 25 375 286 30,77169764 5,922363281 8 P04406 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GAPDH PE=1 SV=3 - [G3P_HUMAN] 94,63 2 13 31 509 335 36,03039959 8,455566406 9 Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PTGES3 PE=1 SV=1 - [TEBP_HUMAN] 93,13 1 5 12 74 160 18,68541938 4,538574219 10 P09417 Dihydropteridine reductase OS=Homo sapiens GN=QDPR PE=1 SV=2 - [DHPR_HUMAN] 93,03 1 1 17 69 244 25,77302971 7,371582031 11 P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen,
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • A Private 16Q24.2Q24.3 Microduplication in a Boy with Intellectual Disability, Speech Delay and Mild Dysmorphic Features
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article A Private 16q24.2q24.3 Microduplication in a Boy with Intellectual Disability, Speech Delay and Mild Dysmorphic Features Orazio Palumbo * , Pietro Palumbo , Ester Di Muro, Luigia Cinque, Antonio Petracca, Massimo Carella and Marco Castori Division of Medical Genetics, Fondazione IRCCS-Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013 Foggia, Italy; [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (E.D.M.); [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-088-241-6350 Received: 5 June 2020; Accepted: 24 June 2020; Published: 26 June 2020 Abstract: No data on interstitial microduplications of the 16q24.2q24.3 chromosome region are available in the medical literature and remain extraordinarily rare in public databases. Here, we describe a boy with a de novo 16q24.2q24.3 microduplication at the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-array analysis spanning ~2.2 Mb and encompassing 38 genes. The patient showed mild-to-moderate intellectual disability, speech delay and mild dysmorphic features. In DECIPHER, we found six individuals carrying a “pure” overlapping microduplication. Although available data are very limited, genomic and phenotype comparison of our and previously annotated patients suggested a potential clinical relevance for 16q24.2q24.3 microduplication with a variable and not (yet) recognizable phenotype predominantly affecting cognition. Comparing the cytogenomic data of available individuals allowed us to delineate the smallest region of overlap involving 14 genes. Accordingly, we propose ANKRD11, CDH15, and CTU2 as candidate genes for explaining the related neurodevelopmental manifestations shared by these patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]