DOCSLIB.ORG

Geographic Distribution of Khapra Beetle, Trogoderma Granarium, by Location As Recorded in Six Publications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geographic Distribution of Khapra Beetle, Trogoderma Granarium, by Location As Recorded in Six Publications Geographic distribution of khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium, by location as recorded in six publications Location EPPO2016 Australia2016 Myers2012 SPIRes2009 French2005 Banks1977 Afghanistan 5 Present, no details Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghanistan Present, flourishes certain areas Algeria 5 Present, widespread Algeria Algeria Algeria Present, flourishes certain areas Present, restricted distribution Angola 5 Absent, unreliable record Angola Angola Absent, doubtful record or intercepted only Argentina 1 Argentina Australia 5 Absent, intercepted only Australia Australia Absent, intercepted only Absence, eradicated Austria 3 Absent, intercepted only Austria Absent, fomerly present Bahrain 2 Bahrain Bahrain Present, restricted distribution Bangladesh 5 Present, no details Bangladesh Bangladesh Bangladesh or intercepted only Belgium 3 Absent, pest no longer present Belgium Absent, fomerly present Benin 2 Benin Benin Bolivia 1 Bolivia Botswana 1 Botswana Bulgaria 3 Absent, intercepted only Bulgaria (i1940) Absent, intercepted only Burkina Faso 5 Present, no details Burkina Burkina Faso Burkina Faso Present, flourishes certain areas Burundi 1 Burundi Canada 2 Canada Canada Cambodia 1 Cambodia Cameroon 1 Cameroon Central African Republic 1 Central Afr. Rep. Chad 1 Chad China 5 Absent, unreliable record China China Absent, doubtful record Uncertain Comoros 1 Comoros Present, restricted distribution Cote d'Ivoire 5 Absent, unreliable record Ivory Coast Ivory Coast Absent, doubtful record or intercepted only Croatia 3 Absent, intercepted only Croatia Absent, intercepted only Cyprus 6 Present, widespread Cyprus Cyprus Cyprus Cyprus Present, flourishes certain areas Czech Republic 3 Absent, intercepted only Czech Republic Absent, intercepted only Denmark 4 Absent, pest no longer present Denmark Denmark Absent, fomerly present Djibouti 1 Djibouti Egypt 6 Present, no details Egypt Egypt Egypt Egypt Present, flourishes certain areas El Salvador 1 El Salvador England 3 England England (i1916) Absent, fomerly present Equatorial Equatorial Guinea 1 Guinea Eritrea 1 Eritrea Ethiopia 4 Ethiopia Ethiopia Ethiopia Absent Finland 1 Finland France 2 France France Gabon 1 Gabon Gambia 5 Absent, unreliable record Gambia Gambia Absent, doubtful record Present, restricted distribution or intercepted only Germany 4 Absent, pest eradicated Germany Germany (i) Absent, eradicated Ghana 2 Ghana Ghana Guatemala 1 Guatemala Present, restricted distribution Guinea 5 Absent, unreliable record Guinea Guinea Absent, doubtful record or intercepted only Guinea Bissau, Guinea Bissau, Rep. 1 Rep. Hong Kong 2 Hong Kong Unknown Hungary 3 Absent, pest eradicated Hungary Absent, eradicated India 6 Present, no details India India India India Present, flourishes certain areas Indonesia 4 Absent, pest no longer present Indonesia Indonesia Absent, fomerly present Iran 6 Present, no details Iran Iran Iran Iran Present, flourishes certain areas Iraq 6 Present, no details Iraq Iraq Iraq Iraq Present, flourishes certain areas Present, restricted distribution Ireland 4 Absent, pest no longer present Ireland Absent, fomerly present or intercepted only Israel 6 Present, restricted distribution Israel Israel Israel Israel Present, flourishes certain areas Italy 4 Absent, intercepted only Italy Absent, intercepted only Uncertain Italy (Sicily) 1 Absent, doubtful record Present, restricted distribution Jamaica 3 Jaimaica Jamaica or intercepted only Present, restricted distribution Japan 5 Absent, pest eradicated Japan Japan (i) Absent, eradicated or intercepted only Jordan 2 Jordan Jordan Kazakhstan 1 Kazakhstan Kenya 4 Absent, pest no longer present Kenya Kenya Absent, fomerly present Korea, Republic 5 Present, no details Korea Korea Korea, Republic of Uncertain Kuwait 2 Kuwait Kuwait Kyrgyzstan 1 Kyrgyzstan Laos 2 Laos Laos Lebanon 5 Present, no details Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Lesotho 1 Lesotho Liberia 2 Liberia Liberia Libya 5 Present, no details Libya Libya Libya Uncertain Luxembourg 3 Absent, pest no longer present Luxembourg Absent, fomerly present Madagascar 4 Madagascar Madagascar Madagascar unknown Malaya 1 Malaya Malaysia (peninsular) 1 Absent, doubtful record Malaysia 5 Absent, pest eradicated Malaysia Malaysia Absent, eradicated Absent (E), disagree (W) Malawi 1 Malawi Mali 6 Present, no details Mali Mali Mali Mali Present, flourishes certain areas Present, restricted distribution Mauritania 5 Present, no details Mauritania Mauritania Mauritania or intercepted only Mauritius 2 Mauritius unknown Mexico 4 Absent, pest no longer present Mexico Absent, fomerly present Absence, eradicated Morocco 5 Present, widespread Morocco Morocco Morocco Present, flourishes certain areas Mozambique 5 Absent, unreliable record Mozambique Mozambique Absent, doubtful record Uncertain Myanmar (formerly Burma) 5 Present, no details Myanmar Myanmar Myanmar Disagree Namibia 1 Namibia Netherlands 3 Absent, pest no longer present Netherlands Absent, fomerly present New Guinea 1 Absent New Zealand 3 Absent, pest no longer present New Zealand Absent, fomerly present Niger 5 Present, no details Niger Niger Niger Present, flourishes certain areas Nigeria 6 Present, restricted distribution Nigeria Nigeria Nigeria Nigeria Present, flourishes certain areas Oman 1 Oman Pakistan 6 Present, no details Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Present, flourishes certain areas Philippines 5 Absent, unreliable record Philippines Philippines Absent, doubtful record Uncertain Poland 3 Absent, intercepted only Poland (i) Absent, intercepted only Portugal 4 Absent, intercepted only Portugal Absent, intercepted only Unknown Qatar 3 Qatar Qatar Qatar Present, restricted distribution Reunion Island 4 Absent, unreliable record Reunion Is. Absent, doubtful record or intercepted only Russia 4 Absent, pest no longer present Russia Absent, fomerly present Disagree Rwanda 1 Rwanda Saudi Arabia 5 Present, no details Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Senegal 6 Present, no details Senegal Senegal Senegal Senegal Present, flourishes certain areas Serbia and Montenegro 3 Absent, unreliable record Serbia Absent, doubtful record Present, restricted distribution Sierra Leone 5 Absent, pest no longer present Sierra Leone Sierra Leone Absent, fomerly present or intercepted only Singapore 2 Singapore Singapore unknown Slovakia 3 Absent, intercepted only Slovakia Absent, intercepted only Somalia 4 Present, no details Somali Republic Somalia Absent, eradicated South Africa 4 Absent, pest eradicated South Africa Absent, eradicated Absence, eradicated Spain 5 Present, restricted distribution Spain Spain Spain Uncertain Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon) 6 Present, no details Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Disagree Sudan 5 Present, no details Sudan Sudan Sudan Sudan Sweden 3 Absent, pest no longer present Sweden Absent, fomerly present Swaziland 1 Swaziland Switzerland 3 Present, restricted distribution Switzerland Switzerland Syria 6 Present, widespread Syria Syria Syria Syria Uncertain Taiwan 5 Absent, pest no longer present Taiwan Taiwan Taiwan Uncertain Tajikistan 1 Tajikistan Tanzania 6 Absent, pest no longer present Tanzania Tanzania Tanzania Absent, fomerly present Absence, eradicated Thailand 5 Absent, unreliable record Thailand Thailand Absent, doubtful record Disagree Togo 1 Togo Tunisia 6 Present, widespread Tunisia Tunisia Tunisia Tunisia Present, flourishes certain areas Turkey 6 Present, restricted distribution Turkey Turkey Turkey Turkey Present, flourishes certain areas Uganda 1 Uganda Ukraine 2 Ukraine Ukraine (Odessa) Present, restricted distribution United Kingdom 2 Absent, pest no longer present or intercepted only United Arab Emirates 3 UAE UAE UAE United States of America 4 Absent, pest eradicated USA (i1946) Absent, eradicated Absence, eradicated Uruguay 2 Absent, confirmed by survey Uruguay Uzbekistan 2 Uzbekistan Uzebekistan Venezuela 4 Absent, pest no longer present Venezuela Venezuela Absent, fomerly present Vietnam 2 Vietnam Vietnam Yemen 5 Present, restricted distribution Yemen Yemen Yemen Yemen Yugoslavia 2 Yugoslavia Uncertain Zaire (formerly Congo) 1 Zaire Zambia 6 Present, no details Zambia Zamibia Zambia Zambia Uncertain Zanzibar 2 Zanzibar Uncertain Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) 5 Present, widespread Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Uncertain References: Australia2016: Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Australian Government (DAWR) 2017. Khapra beetle countries last revised 2016: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/import/before/pests/khapra_beetle There are more than 70 countries known to be infested with khapra beetle throughout Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe Banks1977: Banks, H. J. 1977. Distribution and establishment of Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae): climatic and other influences. Journal of Stored Products Research 13(4): 183-202. EPPO2016: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) 2017. EPPO Global Data Base. Trogoderma granarium. Available at: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/TROGGA https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/TROGGA/distribution French2005: French, S. and R.C. Venette. 2005. Mini Risk Assessment, Khapra Beetle, Trogoderma granarium (Everts) (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Cooperative Agriculture Pest Survey–Pest Risk Assessment (PRA); 22 pages. Myers2012: Myers, S.W. and Hagstrum, D.W. 2012. Quarantine. p. 297–304. In: Hagstrum DW, Phillips TW, Cuperus G, editors. Stored Product Protection. Kansas State University, Kansas, USA. SPIRes2009: Hagstrum, D. W., and Bh. Subramanyam. 2009. Stored-Product Insect Resource. AACC International, St. Paul, Minnesota. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DD 10: Discussion Document
    DD 10: Discussion Document - North American approach to prevent entry, establishment and spread of khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1899; Coleoptera: Dermestidae) in the NAPPO region Prepared by the members of the North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO) Expert Group on khapra beetle, comprised of subject matter experts from the National Plant Protection Organization of each member country as well as industry, in consultation with additional experts from the NAPPO member countries. The NAPPO Executive Committee, the Advisory and Management Committee and the Secretariat gratefully acknowledge and thank the following subject matter experts who contributed to the development of this document: Wendy Asbil, Jason Murphy (CFIA); Scott Myers, Stephen Bullington, Richard Johnson (APHIS PPQ); Héctor Enrique Vega, Nallely Acevedo Reyes, Neftali Reyes Carranza (SENASICA); Gary Martin, Arvid Hawk, Jim Frahm (US industry). Contents Project Objective ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Pest Biology ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Regulatory Framework ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Khapra Beetle on Stored Wheat with Organic Products
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(4): 3465-3471 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 JPP 2018; 7(4): 3465-3471 Management of Khapra beetle on stored wheat Received: 21-05-2018 Accepted: 24-06-2018 with organic products DS Masolkar Assistant professor, Entomology DS Masolkar, RW Gawande, Puja G Chandrawanshi and SS Shinde Section, College of Agriculture, Umarkhed, Maharashtra, India Abstract Wheat (Triticum aestivum.) is nutritionally important cereal crop and comprises major source of protein RW Gawande with minerals and vitamins. In Maharashtra, it is grown in rabi season. Trogoderma granarium is one of Associate professor, Entomology Section, College of Agriculture, the most important and destructive pest of various stored cereals grains in India including wheat. The Nagpur, Maharashtra, India khapra beetle is not only causing quantitative losses but also cause qualitative losses in nutrition that makes most cereals unfit for marketing as well as human consumption. Utilization of insecticides is one Puja G Chandrawanshi of the important components of IPM programmes. Insecticides targeted against insect pest in field Assistant professor, Entomology conditions and also damage the beneficial fauna in nature. Due to their several drawbacks, researchers Section, College of Agriculture, are trying to adopt alternative methods of pest control. (Mahmud et al. 2002). Laboratory experiment was Umarkhed, Maharashtra, India conducted to study “Management of khapra beetle on stored wheat with organic products” at Insectory Field laboratory of Entomology Section, College of Agriculture, Nagpur during 2016-2017 with the two SS Shinde plant powders i.e., black pepper powder, vekhand powder @ 10 g/kg seeds and five vegetable oils i.e., Ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Trogoderma Granarium Everts MAY08 a Key Ph: Contacts: DAFWA
    MAY08Pest of the month – May 2008 a b c Everts Fig. 1. Head- front view of the Khapra beetle (a); Khapra beetle larvae (b); and lateral view of the Khapra beetle (c). Photo credits: http://www.padil.gov.au/viewPestDiagnosticImages.aspx?id=124 Common Name: Khapra beetle Pest: Stored grain products Classification: P: Arthropoda, C: Insecta, O: Coleoptera, F: Dermestidae Host Range: Dispersal into New Locations: T. granarium feed on most dried plant or animal Adult Khapra only naturally disperse over a short matter, however they prefer cereals and cereal distance. Therefore, primary movement of adults and products, particularly wheat, barley, oats, rye, inactive larvae is human aided via truck, railcar, ship maize, rice, flour, malt and noodles. holds and packing material. Impact: Key Distinguishing Features: Although the Khapra Beetle doesn’t cause a direct Adult beetles are 1.4-3.4 mm long, 0.75-1.9 mm wide, impact on the environment, it does destroy grain ovate and densely hairy. Colour of the Khapra stocks, cause imposition of unfavourable beetle’s top surface is dark reddish-brown with restrictions on exports and requires toxic indistinct patches of yellowish-white setae on the fumigants to be controlled. Australia doesn't pronotum and 3 indistinct yellowish-white bands on harbour the Khapra beetle, however, if it became the wings. The setae on the under surface are of two established it could cost the Australian economy types: evenly distributed, coarse, semi-erect, $1.83 billion annually. This is mainly attributed to yellowish-brown with a few scattered, dark reddish its ability to reduce the stored products weight by brown setae.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Evaluation of Neem (Azadirachta Indica) Seed and Leaf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE & BIOLOGY ISSN Print: 1560–8530; ISSN Online: 1814–9596 09–429/SAE/2010/12–4–638–640 http://www.fspublishers.org Short Communication Laboratory Evaluation of Neem (Azadirachta indica) Seed and Leaf Powders for the Control of Khapra Beetle, Trogoderma granarium (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) Infesting Groundnut E. EGWURUBE1, B.T. MAGAJI AND Z. LAWAL Department of Crop Protection Institute for Agricultural Research (IAR), Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 1Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Bioassay evaluation of neem (Azadirachta Indica A. Juss) seed powder (NSP) and neem leaf powder (NLP) against the larvae of Trogoderma granarium in stored groundnut was conducted under open laboratory conditions of 27oC and 70±10% relative humidity. Ripened neem seed fruits and leaves were collected from neem trees, adequately shade-dried, pounded and sieved to obtain fine powder. Treatments were applied at 2.5, 5 and 10% w/w Samnut-22 groundnut seed, with pirimiphos-methyl (2% Actellic dust) as standard check in addition to an untreated control. Larval mortality, progeny emergence, seed damage and viability were assessed. Results showed that NSP was next to Actellic dust in efficacy followed by the NLP; all significantly better than the untreated control in causing greater larval mortality, reduced progeny emergence and seed damage with no harm to seed viability. Actellic dust at 5 and 10% w/w was more effective than the plant materials as 100% mortality was achieved within 24 h post-treatment with no seed damaged. NSP treatment gave 100% mortality only at 10% w/w level with about 6.5% and 6.7% seed damage and progeny emergence respectively, while NLP was the least efficacious giving 50% mortality at 10% w/w, 28% seed damage and 33% progeny emergence in 24 h but better than the untreated control in all the parameters evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Ecology and Management of Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma Serricorne Fab. Infesting Stored Fennel (Foeniculum Vulgare Mill.)
    BIO-ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF CIGARETTE BEETLE, LASIODERMA SERRICORNE FAB. INFESTING STORED FENNEL (FOENICULUM VULGARE MILL.) Thesis Submitted to the Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Agriculture (Entomology) By Krishna Rolania 2009 RAJASTHAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, BIKANER S.K.N. COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, JOBNER CERTIFICATE - I Dated : ............2009 This is to certify that Ms. Krishna Rolania had successfully completed the preliminary examination held on ___________ as required under the regulation for Ph.D. degree. (Ashok Sharma) Head Department of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner RAJASTHAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, BIKANER S.K.N. COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, JOBNER CERTIFICATE - II Dated : ........2009 This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Bio-ecology and Management of Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne Fab. Infesting Stored Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)” submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Entomology embodies bonafide research work carried out by Ms. Krishna Rolania under my guidance and supervision and that no part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree. The assistance and help received during the course of investigation have been fully acknowledged. The draft of the thesis was also approved by advisory committee on __________. (Ashok Sharma) (M.C. Bhargava) Head of the Department Major Advisor (B.R. Chhipa) Dean S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner RAJASTHAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, BIKANER S.K.N. COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, JOBNER CERTIFICATE - III Dated : .............2009 This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Bio-ecology and Management of Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne Fab.
    [Show full text]
  • Khapra Beetle Trogoderma Granarium
    Khapra beetle Trogoderma granarium Description Considered one of the world's most destructive pests of grain products and seeds. Identification Adult males are 1.4-2.3 mm long, 0.75-1.1 mm wide; adult females are 2.1-3.4 mm long, 1.7-1.9 mm wide, ovate and densely hairy beetles. Head and pronotum are dark reddish-brown, elytra is reddish-brown, usually with indistinct lighter reddish-brown fasciae; venter of thorax and abdomen reddish-brown and legs are yellowish-brown. Antennae are yellowish-brown, 9, 10 or 11 segments, with a 3-5 segmented club. Habitat Native to India and South Asia. Wheat (Triticum aestivum), Barley (Hordeum vulgare), Oat (Avena Source: MISIN. 2021. Midwest Invasive Species Information Network. Michigan State University - Applied Spatial Ecology and Technical Services Laboratory. Available online at https://www.misin.msu.edu/facts/detail.php?id=246. sativa), Rye, Maize(Zea mays), Rice (Oryza sativa), Flour, Malt, Noodles, Stored agricultural products, including spices, grains and packaged foods Reproduction Exhibit gonochorism (reproduction involving separate male and female individuals). Development rates and survival varies depending on the host, temperature, light, moisture, season, based on these factors there can be from 1 to 9 generations per year. Adult lifespan is between 12-25 days and females lay between 50-100 eggs. Larvael development usually takes 4-6 weeks. Larvae molt between 4-15 times. The pupal state lasts 2-5 days and quiescent adult stage lasts 1-2 days. Larval stage can last from a month to a year, if it enters diapause. They are capable of surviving without food for a period of several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Khapra Beetle EXOTIC PEST What Is Khapra Beetle? Khapra Beetle (Trogoderma Granarium) Is a Serious Pest of Stored Grain and Dry Foodstuffs Worldwide
    Khapra beetle EXOTIC PEST EXOTIC What is khapra beetle? Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium) is a serious pest of stored grain and dry foodstuffs worldwide. It can cause losses of up to 75% from direct feeding. Infested grain also becomes contaminated with beetles, cast skins and hairs from larvae, which can – be a health risk and are difficult to remove from grain storage structures and transport vessels. This beetle CALL THE EXOTIC PLANT PEST HOTLINE IF SUSPECTED IF HOTLINE PEST PLANT EXOTIC THE CALL is not present in Australia and poses a major threat to Australia’s grains industry. What does it look like? Khapra beetle adults are small (2-3 mm long and 1-2 mm Larvae on a maize kernal wide), brownish in colour with a smooth oval shaped body. thebeatsheet There are 3 transverse bands (markings) of pale colour hairs on the wing covers. Eggs hatch into small hairy larvae that can grow up to 7 mm long, are reddish brown in colour and darken as they mature. Larvae have characteristic long hairs all over their body, especially at the rear end and can survive without food for over 12 months. What can it be confused with? Khapra beetle is almost identical to the warehouse beetle, which is established in Australia, and some closely related native beetle species. If you find any beetle or hairy larvae fitting the description of the khapra beetle, have it identified by an expert. Adult khapra beetle What should I look for? PaDIL As khapra beetle is a stored grain pest it will only be found in stored products and around places where stored products are kept or transported.
    [Show full text]
  • Khapra Beetle Control Studies
    Khapra Beetle Control preliminary results of tests with fumigants c promise of effective treatments against dest D. 1. lir tire grains but can feed on broken length and is enclosed, with the excep- kernels damaged by fourth instar larvae tion of a portion of the dorsum, by the or on the floury debris which they last cast larval skin. create. When the adults emerge from the Khapra larvae and adults on pecan meats. The adults, as a rule, do not feed, but pupa, they remain quiescent within the they have been observed gnawing at the last larval skin for a period which varies The State of California, by Quaran- from a few hours to 10 days or more, ac- tine Regulation 21, effective January 12, cording to temperature. The adult is a 1955, prohibits the removal from prop- small beetle, the female measuring about erty infested with the Khapra beetle- %’’ in length. It is a dark-brown, slow- Trogoderma granarium, Everts-of all moving insect. The adults do not fly, materials that might help the spread of and this insect can be dispersed by wind, this insect which is so destructive to birds, and so forth. stored grain and grain products. The presence of the Khapra beetle in Since the Khapra beetle was first grain causes heating, as was indicated found established in the United States in Imperial Valley when the outside air in stored barley in two warehouses in temperature was 53F and the tempera- Tulare County-November 1953-infes- ture of infested stored barley 12“ below tations have been discovered in eight the surface was 104F.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX I FEDERAL SERVICE for VETERINARY and PHYTOSANITARY SUPERVISION Federal State Institution «ALL-RUSSIAN CENTER of PLANT
    ANNEX I FEDERAL SERVICE FOR VETERINARY AND PHYTOSANITARY SUPERVISION Federal State Institution «ALL-RUSSIAN CENTER OF PLANT QUARANTINE” ANALYSIS OF PHYTOSANITARY RISK OF KHAPRA BEETLE TROGODERMA GRANARIUM FOR THE TERRITORY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Moscow - 2006 1 Analysis of phytosanitary risk of Trogoderma granarium for the RF territory Analysis of phytosanitary risk of the khaprabeetle Trogoderma granarium for the territory of the Russian Federation is prepared by the Chief Agronomist of Department of Scientific-Methodical Support of FSI “ARSPQ”, Candidate of Science {Biology}Y.А. Sokolov. The materials are considered and approved by the Scientific- Methodical Council of FSI “ARSRIPQ”, (protocolNo. dated “___” __________ 2006). Editinggroup: • M.I. Maslov–Director of Phytosanitary Supervision Department Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance • U.Sh. Magomedov–DirectorofFSI “All-RussianCenter of Plant Quarantine” • N.D. Tryakhov - Deputy Director of Phytosanitary Supervision Department Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance 2 Analysis of phytosanitary risk of Trogoderma granarium for the RF territory Introduction The khapra beetle is one of the most dangerous pests of grain and products of its reprocessing in the world. It is included into the list of quarantine pests of all countries with phytosanitary service, as well as the list of international organizations for the plant protection. Khapra beetle damages the whole grain of cereals, rice, corn, oilseeds, bean, seeds of vegetable, forest,
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Toxic Potential of Insecticide and Indigenous Botanical Extract Against the Stored Grain Pest Tribolium Castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)
    Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 27, No. 5 (2018), 2377-2383 DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/79436 ONLINE PUBLICATION DATE: 2018-04-27 Original Research Assessing the Toxic Potential of Insecticide and Indigenous Botanical Extract against the Stored Grain Pest Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Batool Zuhra1, Khalil Ahmad1, Shaukat Ali2*, Azhar Hussain3, Maisoor Ahmad Nafees1, Salar Ali4, Muhammad Ali1, Sadiq Hussain5, Zulfiqar Ali3 1Department of Biological Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan 2Department of Environmental Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan 3Department of Food and Agriculture Technology, Karakoram International University Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan 4Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China 5Department of Behavioral Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan Received: 15 June 2017 Accepted: 29 October 2017 Abstract The current investigation was undertaken to assess the toxic potential of synthetic insecticides (K.Othrin and bio-max) and botanical extracts (Mentha royleana L. and Artemisia absinthium L.) against Tribolium castaneum in the laboratory. Different concentrations of insecticides and botanical extracts were used following complete randomized block design. The results indicated that the toxic effects were directly proportional to concentrations of insecticide and botanical extracts. Higher concentrations had more resilient toxicity
    [Show full text]
  • Khapra Beetle, Trogoderma Granarium Interceptions and Eradications in Australia and Around the World
    Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium interceptions and eradications in Australia and around the world Cheryl Day ab and Ben White ab* aSchool of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia bPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia *E-mail address: [email protected] 11 October 2016 Working Paper 1609 School of Agricultural and Resource Economics http://www.are.uwa.edu.au Citation: Day, C. and White, B. (2016) Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium interceptions and eradications in Australia and around the world. SARE Working paper 1609, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23786.31682 © Copyright remains with the authors of this document. Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium interceptions and eradications in Australia and around the world Cheryl Day and Ben White Abstract The number of recorded intercepts and eradications of khapra beetle ( Trogoderma granarium ) have increased in Australia and the United States in recent years. Khapra beetle is one of the most destructive stored grain pests, and infestations can destroy the quality of grain and other commodities rendering the product unfit for human consumption. This pest can be easily transported from khapra beetle countries undetected as live beetles, eggs and larvae or in a state of diapause, with the transfer of people and goods around the world. Historically, discovery of khapra beetle post-border has generally resulted in costly eradication programs including methyl bromide fumigation and years of surveillance. Misidentification, failed detection or lack of preparedness has led to slow responses and at times the wide distribution of the pest prior to action.
    [Show full text]
  • Khapra Beetle (Trogoderma Granarium Everts): a Food Security Threat
    Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 6[11] October 2017 : 14-19 ©2017 Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, India Online ISSN 2277-1808 Journal’s URL:http://www.bepls.com CODEN: BEPLAD Global Impact Factor 0.876 Universal Impact Factor 0.9804 NAAS Rating 4.95 REVIEW ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Khapra Beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts): A Food Security Threat Amit Singh1, Phool Chand1, R. Vishwakarma2* and Chandan Kumar Singh3 [email protected], and [email protected] and [email protected] 1Department of Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Mohanpur, 741235, W. B. *2Department of Entomology, Bihar Agricultural University, sabaur-813210, Bhagalpur, Bihar 3Department of Plant Pathology, N. D. U. A.&T., Kumarganj, Faizabad- 224229 (U.P.), India ABSTRACT Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) is a serious pest of stored grains and stored products (groundnut, cotton, barley, rice, millet, sesame, sorghum, wheat, maize and cowpea etc.) with quarantine status is one of the invasive species feared around the world. Identification of adult khapra beetle on the basis of morphology is difficult due to its similarity with other dermestids, thus study of genitalia will specify the species and also aim at understanding its reproduction and fecundity. Damage can be severe with weight losses of between 5-30 per cent and in extreme cases 70 per cent. Besides weight losses it also reduces the grade of grain, unfit for consumption and may result in less profit for wholesalers. Apart from the destruction of grain dry products by Khapra beetle, ingesting products contaminated with body parts, setae and cast larval skins can result in gastro-intestinal irritation.
    [Show full text]