Redwood Ed: a Guide to the Coast Redwoods for Learners and Teachers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
• D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery. -
Refuge Update, I Noted That Most Important, We Have the Finest Mission and Conservation Values
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System Inside RefugeUpdate July/August 2007 Vol 4, No 4 Counting Alpine Flora, page 3 Selawik National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska is the first GLORIA site Preventing Lange’s Metalmark in the North American Arctic. Butterfly from Floating Away Focus on Law Enforcement, pages 8–12 Refuge System law enforcement officers face a range of challenges on refuge lands. Virtual Geocaching, page 15 High-tech scavenger hunts reward treasure seekers at Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge. The Big Sit! at Your Refuge?, page 21 Refuge managers may want to consider this new event for Refuge Week. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has launched an aggressive new effort to restore habitat for Lange’s metalmark butterfly at Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge in California. (Jerry Powell) by Jim Nickles captive-breeding – has worked to stabilize the population of the Palos Verdes blue he Lange’s metalmark butterfly, butterfly, once thought to be extinct. Twhose only home is a few stunted sand mounds in the town of Antioch, Metalmark butterflies – fragile and California, is fluttering dangerously close brightly colored – are named for to extinction. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife their grey, or metallic-colored, wing Service has launched an aggressive tips. While many types of metalmark Okefenokee Swamp new effort to restore habitat at Antioch butterflies are found throughout The cool serenity of the Okefenokee Dunes National Wildlife Refuge and California, the Lange’s metalmark is Swamp as seen in this new breed the species in captivity until its named for William H. -
Frontispiece the 1864 Field Party of the California Geological Survey
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC ROAD GUIDE TO KINGS CANYON AND SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARKS, CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By James G. Moore, Warren J. Nokleberg, and Thomas W. Sisson* Open-File Report 94-650 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. * Menlo Park, CA 94025 Frontispiece The 1864 field party of the California Geological Survey. From left to right: James T. Gardiner, Richard D. Cotter, William H. Brewer, and Clarence King. INTRODUCTION This field trip guide includes road logs for the three principal roadways on the west slope of the Sierra Nevada that are adjacent to, or pass through, parts of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (Figs. 1,2, 3). The roads include State Route 180 from Fresno to Cedar Grove in Kings Canyon Park (the Kings Canyon Highway), State Route 198 from Visalia to Sequoia Park ending near Grant Grove (the Generals Highway) and the Mineral King road (county route 375) from State Route 198 near Three Rivers to Mineral King. These roads provide a good overview of this part of the Sierra Nevada which lies in the middle of a 250 km span over which no roads completely cross the range. The Kings Canyon highway penetrates about three-quarters of the distance across the range and the State Route 198~Mineral King road traverses about one-half the distance (Figs. -
Sequoia & Kings Canyon-Volume 1
Draft National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior General Management Plan and Sequoia and Kings Canyon Comprehensive River Management Plan / National Parks Middle and South Forks of the Environmental Impact Statement Kings River and North Fork of the Kern River Tulare and Fresno Counties California Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index Page intentionally left blank SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS and MIDDLE AND SOUTH FORKS OF THE KINGS RIVER AND NORTH FORK OF THE KERN RIVER Tulare and Fresno Counties • California DRAFT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index This document presents five alternatives that are being considered for the management and use of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks over the next 15–20 years. The purpose of the Draft General Management Plan is to establish a vision for what Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks should be, including desired future conditions for natural and cultural resources, as well as for visitor experiences. The no-action alternative would continue current management direction, and it is the baseline for comparing the other alternatives (it was originally alternative B when the alternatives were first presented to the public in the winter of 2000). The preferred alternative is the National Park Service’s proposed action, and it would accommodate sustainable growth and visitor enjoyment, protect ecosystem diversity, and preserve basic character while adapting to changing user groups. Alternative A would emphasize natural ecosystems and biodiversity, with reduced use and development; alternative C would preserve the parks’ traditional character and retain the feel of yesteryear, with guided growth; and alternative D would preserve the basic character and adapt to changing user groups. -
Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests
Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Current Management Direction ................................................................................................................. 1 Types of Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. -
2021 Redwood National and State Parks Visitor Guide
Redwood National Park Redwood National and State Parks Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park Visitor Guide The offcial 2021 visitor guide of Redwood National and State Parks PHOTO / STEVE OLSON Park Map Big Trees Scenic Drives Change Discover the best way to navigate Redwood’s Learn about the three kinds of redwood trees The type of vehicle you drive will determine mosaic of habitats…pages 6-7 and the best places to see them…page 5 which roads are suitable for you…page 7 The Superintendents of Redwood National D a v i l s rai Cree oad o T st Man k R n o n Lo and State Parks welcome you to relax and R a s o d avi D k 101 To Bald Hills Road ee L r il o C a st enjoy one of the most peaceful places Elk Meadow Day Use Area r M ie T ir n a l a o n Creek Trai r is P v a Berry Glen Trail D on earth. These forests provide sanctuary Other trails 3 l l i m a i from the stresses of fast-paced modern l r e Picnic area T s f s r ll o a m Parking area F E l k k life, steadfast and appearing unchanged m u M illi Tr e Restrooms a d ow to over eons. But no place is untouched by LB J G Lady Bird Johnson B r e ov Grove Trail r e j ry ct. -
Request for Proposal for Redwoods Rising Forest & Road Restoration
Request for Proposal for Redwoods Rising Forest & Road Restoration Operations October 2019 INTRODUCTION In partnership with the National Park Service (NPS) and the California Department of Parks and Recreation (CDPR), Save the Redwoods League (the League) is seeking proposals for services to conduct ecological restoration activities including forest thinning, road improvement and removal, and stockpiling large pieces of wood to be installed in creeks as aquatic habitat structures within Redwood National and State Parks (RNSP). This project is expected to last for several years, and it is the partnership’s intent to develop a long-term relationship with a trusted operator to implement a complex suite of activities across multiple watersheds, forest types, and road conditions. Competitive proposals will assure high quality and timely work, transparency in practices and accounting, will employ local labor where possible, and demonstrated commitment to long-term stewardship. SECTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Overview RNSP includes Redwood National Park, Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park, Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park, and Prairie Creek Redwoods State Parks. The parks are home to 45 percent of the world’s remaining protected old-growth redwoods. However, alongside these remaining primeval redwood stands are large swaths of forest that bear the scars of logging, including eroding roads, degraded streams, and unnaturally dense forest stands. The park’s diverse landscape supports a wide variety of habitats and ecosystems (e.g., coastal dune/scrub, forests, woodlands, grasslands) and essential habitat for threatened, endangered, and special status species such as marbled murrelet, northern spotted owl, and salmonids such as coho salmon, chinook salmon, and steelhead trout. -
Challenge of the Big Trees
Challenge of the Big Trees Challenge of the Big Trees CHALLENGE OF THE BIG TREES Lary M. Dilsaver and William C. Tweed ©1990, Sequoia Natural History Association, Inc. CONTENTS NEXT >>> Challenge of the Big Trees ©1990, Sequoia Natural History Association dilsaver-tweed/index.htm — 12-Jul-2004 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dilsaver-tweed/index.htm[7/2/2012 5:14:17 PM] Challenge of the Big Trees (Table of Contents) Challenge of the Big Trees Table of Contents COVER LIST OF MAPS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS FOREWORD PREFACE CHAPTER ONE: The Natural World of the Southern Sierra CHAPTER TWO: The Native Americans and the Land CHAPTER THREE: Exploration and Exploitation (1850-1885) CHAPTER FOUR: Parks and Forests: Protection Begins (1885-1916) CHAPTER FIVE: Selling Sequoia: The Early Park Service Years (1916-1931) CHAPTER SIX: Colonel John White and Preservation in Sequoia National Park (1931- 1947) CHAPTER SEVEN: Two Battles For Kings Canyon (1931-1947) CHAPTER EIGHT: Controlling Development: How Much is Too Much? (1947-1972) CHAPTER NINE: New Directions and A Second Century (1972-1990) APPENDIX A: Visitation Statistics, 1891-1988 APPENDIX B: Superintendents of Sequoia, General Grant, and Kings Canyon National Parks NOTES TO CHAPTERS PUBLISHED SOURCES ARCHIVAL RESOURCES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INDEX (omitted from online edition) ABOUT THE AUTHORS http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dilsaver-tweed/contents.htm[7/2/2012 5:14:22 PM] Challenge of the Big Trees (Table of Contents) List of Maps 1. Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks and Vicinity 2. Important Place Names of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 3. -
Broken Ankle Lessons Learned Review Circle Meadow Prescribed Fire Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks August 2012
Broken Ankle Lessons Learned Review Circle Meadow Prescribed Fire Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks August 2012 Broken Ankle Lessons Learned Review – Circle Meadow Prescribed Fire – Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 1 Contents 1. Leader’s Intent………………..……………..…………………. 3 2. Introduction………………….….…...……….....….…………… 3 3. Incident Narrative……………………………...……….…....... 4 4. The Medical Response…………..……….……...………........ 12 5. Lessons Learned from Participants A. Medical Operation………..….………….…….………. 16 B. General Operations………………..…………………. 17 C. Risk and Decision Making………….……….……….. 17 D. Key Take Home Message: Medical Scenario Training………..….………... 18 6. Trees of Special Interest………………………………………. 19 7. Commendations……………….………………………….……. 23 8. Further Learning Opportunities………………….....………… 24 9. Review Team……………………………...……….……......... 25 10. Appendix – ‘Trees of Special Interest’ Section 5-4 Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Fire Management Plan…….………………...... 26 11. Special Tribute to Daniel Holmes………….…….………….. 30 Broken Ankle Lessons Learned Review – Circle Meadow Prescribed Fire – Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 2 1. Leader’s Intent On July 17, 2012, the Superintendent of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks issued a Delegation of Authority for a team to review a broken ankle incident that occurred on the Circle Meadow Prescribed Fire on June 26, 2012. From the Superintendent’s Delegation of Authority direction to the Lessons Learned Review Team: The primary goal of the review is to determine lessons learned and better manage risk into the future. I would like your team to focus on two specific issues for Organizational Learning: 1. Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks “Trees of Special Interest Policy” (and how it is implemented) found in the Park Fuels and Fire Management Plan; and 2. The post-incident medical response. -
Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Parks
S o k u To Bishop ee t Piute Pass Cr h F 11423ft p o o 3482m r h k s S i o B u B i th G s h L o A p Pavilion Dome Mount C F 11846ft IE Goethe C or r R e k S 3611m I 13264ft a D VID e n 4024m k E J Lake oa q Sabrina u McClure Meadow k r i n 9600ft o F 2926m e l d R d Mount Henry i i Mount v 12196ft e Darwin M 3717m r The Hermit 13830ft South L 12360ft 4215m E 3767m Lake Big Pine C G 3985ft DINKEY O O 1215m O P D Hell for Sure Pass E w o N D Mount V s 11297ft A O e t T R McGee n L LAKES 3443m D U s E 12969ft T 3953m I O C C o A N r N Mount Powell WILDERNESS r D B a Y A JOHN l 13361ft I O S V I R N N 4072m Bi Bishop Pass g P k i ine Cree v I D e 11972ft r E 3649m C Mount Goddard L r E MUIR e 13568ft Muir Pass e C DUSY North Palisade k 4136m 11955ft O BASIN 3644m N 14242ft Black Giant T E 4341m 13330ft COURTRIGHT JOHN MUIR P Le Conte A WILDERNESS 4063m RESERVOIR L I Canyon S B Charybdis A 395 8720ft i D rc 13091ft E Middle Palisade h 2658m Mount Reinstein 14040ft 3990m C r WILDERNESS CR Cre e 12604ft A ek v ES 4279m i Blackcap 3842m N T R Mountain Y O an INYO d s E 11559ft P N N a g c r i 3523m C ui T f n M rail i i H c John K A e isad Creek C N Pal r W T e E s H G D t o D I T d E T E d V r WISHON G a a IL O r O S i d l RESERVOIR R C Mather Pass Split Mountain G R W Finger Pe ak A Amphitheater 14058ft E 12100ft G 12404ft S Lake 4285m 3688m E 3781m D N U IV P S I C P D E r E e R e k B C A SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST E art Taboose r S id G g k e I N Pass r k Tunemah Peak V D o e I 11894ft 11400ft F e A R r C 3625m ree 3475m C k L W n L k O Striped -
Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park a History
Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park A History Boyes House at the Elk Prairie. Photo August 2015 Prepared for: Susan Doniger District Interpretive Specialist North Coast Redwoods, California State Parks Prepared by: Susie Van Kirk Historic Resources Consultant PO Box 568 Bayside, CA 95524 707-822-6066 [email protected] September 2015 Table of Contents Introduction: 1 Methods: 1 Setting: 2 Patenting the Public Domain: 3 The Gold Bluffs: 8 Upper Bluff: 11 Lower Bluff: 17 Travel: 23 Settlers: 27 Civilian Conservation Corps: 34 Redwoods Preservation and Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park: 43 Newton B. Drury: 53 Bibliography: 55 Maps, Photographs, and Other Materials Six River National Forest map: 2 Puter in jail cell: 6 Bruff’s Middle Station: 9 Plat of placer claim: 13 Metsker map: 16 John Chapman’s residence at Gold Bluff: 19 Lagoon and mining flumes at Gold Bluff: 20 Waterman map: 24 Lentell map: 25 Brown’s cabin: 29 Prairie at Harris place: 30 Boyes house: 32 Custodian’s lodge: 38 Camp site: 39 Camp center: 39 Aerial of CCC camp: 41 Park cabin: 42 Prairie fence: 43 Russ Grove: 47 John Godwood’s cabin: 49 Elk at Prairie: 50 Park trail: 51 Newton B. Drury: 53 Redwood Highway in Park: 58 Introduction For those who travel California’s north coast—visitors and locals alike—Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park (the Park) is the ultimate park experience. Uniquely situated, the Park includes ancient redwoods, streams, ocean beaches with towering cliffs, and a large prairie surrounded by the giant trees, each with its own specially-adapted flora and fauna, the latter including salmon and steelhead, Roosevelt elk, and the elusive marbled murrelet. -
Redwood Highway/Save the Redwoods Movement Susie Van Kirk
Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Susie Van Kirk Papers Special Collections 12-2015 Redwood Highway/Save the Redwoods Movement Susie Van Kirk Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Van Kirk, Susie, "Redwood Highway/Save the Redwoods Movement" (2015). Susie Van Kirk Papers. 25. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Susie Van Kirk Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REDWOOD HIGHWAY/SAVE THE REDWOODS MOVEMENT Research for State Parks project August 2013-April 2014 Engbeck, Joseph H., Jr., State Parks of California. 1980. Graphic Arts Center Publishing Co., Portland. Chapter 4. Save the Redwoods! Naturalists had explored the forests of the north coast region and some, including John Mur, were especially impressed by the extraordinary stand of redwoods alongside the South Fork of the Eel River at bull Creek and the nearby Dyerville Flat. These experts agreed that the coast redwood forest was at its magnificent best far to the north of San Francisco. Some authorities went so far as to say that the Bull Creek and Dyerville Flat area supported the most impressive and spectacular forest in the whole world…. In 1916 and 1917 several developments took place that would eventually have a profound impact on the north coast redwood region in general and the Bull Creek-Dyerville Flat area in particular.