DOCSLIB.ORG

Redwood Highway/Save the Redwoods Movement Susie Van Kirk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Susie Van Kirk Papers Special Collections 12-2015 Redwood Highway/Save the Redwoods Movement Susie Van Kirk Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Van Kirk, Susie, "Redwood Highway/Save the Redwoods Movement" (2015). Susie Van Kirk Papers. 25. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Susie Van Kirk Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REDWOOD HIGHWAY/SAVE THE REDWOODS MOVEMENT Research for State Parks project August 2013-April 2014 Engbeck, Joseph H., Jr., State Parks of California. 1980. Graphic Arts Center Publishing Co., Portland. Chapter 4. Save the Redwoods! Naturalists had explored the forests of the north coast region and some, including John Mur, were especially impressed by the extraordinary stand of redwoods alongside the South Fork of the Eel River at bull Creek and the nearby Dyerville Flat. These experts agreed that the coast redwood forest was at its magnificent best far to the north of San Francisco. Some authorities went so far as to say that the Bull Creek and Dyerville Flat area supported the most impressive and spectacular forest in the whole world…. In 1916 and 1917 several developments took place that would eventually have a profound impact on the north coast redwood region in general and the Bull Creek-Dyerville Flat area in particular. First of all, the National Park Service was created in 1916, and under the inspired leadership of its first director, Stephen T. Mather, set out to acquire for public “use, resort, and recreation” those features of North America that could best remind Americans of their pioneer tradition and of the magnificent natural heritage that everyone had a right to enjoy and a responsibility to preserve…. The second major factor affecting Bull Creek and the north coast redwoods was the construction of a new state highway through the redwoods to Eureka and Crescent City in the extreme northwest corner of California. This new highway passed right through the Bull Creek- Dyerville Flat area and promised to open up the whole South Fork of the Eel to increased tourism and to commercial logging…. In August 1917, a number of prominent business and professional men, academicians, and others gathered for the annual summer encampment of San Francisco’s prestigious Bohemian Club….north coast redwood preservation issue [came] up for discussion….Several members of the club were eager to have a look at the situation and before long an expedition was in the making…. The expedition was so revealing—so impressive and yet so worrisome—that a letter was immediately written (August 9, 1917) to the governor of California, William D. Stephens, asking him to find some way of preserving part of the great natural spectacle they had just witnessed….The letter was signed by Henry Fairfield Osborn, president of the American Museum of Natural History, New York; and was co-signed by Madison Grant, chairman of the New York Zoological Society. The third, but unsigned party to the letter was Dr. John C. Merriam, professor of paleontology and Dean of the Faculties at the University of California in Berkeley…. Grant worked with Merriam and others to form an organization that he said should be called the “Save-the-Redwoods League” ….In Washington in October 1918, Grant and Merriam met with Franklin K. Lane, then Secretary of the Interior….They discussed the redwood situation and with Mather’s help persuaded Lane to serve as president of the new league….In August 1919, Mather and Madison Grant came west in time to attend the Pg. 44: In 1921 the league [Save the Redwoods League] pursued legislation that promised to provide $300,000 of state money to supplement the funds already being expended by the league and by Humboldt County for acquisition of redwood forest land adjacent to the state highway in southern Humboldt County….In June…he [Governor Stephens] approved the legislation and thereafter Solon Williams of the Forestry Board was able to acquire several redwood groves alongside the highway adjacent to the South Fork of the Eel River in what is now Humboldt Redwoods State Park. One of those areas, Richardson Grove, included a campground, rental cabins, and other tourist accommodations that were suitable for public use and management by concession contract. Pg. 44-45: Negotiations between the League and the Pacific Lumber Co. concerning the incomparable forest at Dyerville Flat and Bull Creek had been underway for several years….Pacific Lumber was simply unwilling to sell it. No prospect that either the federal government nor the state would save these areas; only hope was Humboldt County with funds from the League; P.L. started logging late 1924.. Drury alerted key members of the League; John Merriam contacted Madison Grant, who had been pursuing a very promising line of discussion with John D. Rockefeller, Jr. regarding a large donation to the League. Grant wired (Nov. 25, 1924) William Crocker advising him to proceed with negotiations for “as large an area in both Bull Creek and Dyerville tracts as is obtainable.” In this endeavor the League could count on up to one million dollars, but under no circumstances was anyone to say anything about who had provided the money. League offered to provide acquisition funds to Humboldt County if the county would agree to acquire the Dyerville Flat-Bull Creek redwoods by condemnation, if necessary. After stormy dramatic public hearing, the Board of Supervisors agreed to proceed with acquisition of both Dyerville Flat and Bull Creek Flat. The County also obtained a court order that immediately prohibited further logging. Years would go by before a settlement could be reached. League needed more funds, instead of a million maybe four or five million. Faced with this dilemma the League began to give serious consideration to the possibility of a public bond act that would enable the state to acquire redwood parks using state funds matched by League and other private donations. League’s state park committee: Duncan McDuffie, William E. Colby and J.C. Sperry were asked to recommend “a definite plan for a state park system and administration in California.” McDuffie advised that further state involvement in redwood forest preservation was most likely to come about as one element in a comprehensive, statewide park program. A whole system of parks should be created, along with a single state park commission that could coordinate state park matters on a statewide basis. Need for survey of park possibilities throughout state. Best person for the job was Frederick Law Olmstead, Jr.. Legislation would be required and a bond act for funding. League state park committee had already prepared draft legislation. Page 48-50: Group formed, California State Parks Committee, with Drury given primary responsibility for organizing public support for two park bills. SB 185 provided for the creation of a central state park commission; SB 608 set up a statewide survey of potential state park sites. Broad support, but Pacific Lumber was opposed and former governor Pardee. The Commission bill was amended to make the commission more or less subject to the Board of Control, but Governor Friend Richardson let the bills die by pocket veto, he simply refused to sign. February 7, 1927, California State Parks Committee was revived as a campaign organization designed to support legislation that would create a State Park System. Three new bills SB 439 provided for the creation of a single state park commission; SB 440 provided for a comprehensive survey of potential park sites; SB 441 provided for submission to the voters of a $6 million bond issue that would provide funds for state park acquisition purposes, dollar for dollar match. The state park bills of 1927 sailed through the legislative committee process. Governor signed on May 25, 1927. During summer of 1927, the State Parks Committee began making plans for the bond campaign of 1928 for the $6 million. First State Park Commission appointed by Gov. Young in Nov. 1927: William E. Colby, Ray Lyman Wilbur, Henry W. O’Melveny, Frederick Russell Burnham and Senator Wilbur Chandler. At January 1928 meeting the State Park Commission appointed Colonel Charles B. Wing as Chief of the division of Parks. At same meeting Commission approved Olmstead’s proposal for carrying out the state park survey. Huge organized campaign for bond issue, which passed Nov 6, 1928, three to one. Page 57: Although the State Park System of 1928-29 was small and primitive, its prospects were bright….In January, 1929, representatives of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. notified the Save-the- Redwoods League that the Rockefeller gift of $1 million for park acquisition of Bull Creek- Dyerville Flat need not be kept anonymous and secret any longer. Voter approval of the State Park Bond Act had convinced Rockefeller that Californians were ready to shoulder their own local responsibilities with regard to redwood forest preservation and related state park matters. Rockefeller now informed the League that he was ready and willing to donate another $1 million for redwood preservation if the amount could be matched. Page 57-60: [Olmstead conducted survey of potential parks with public involvement and turned in report in December 1928. Early 1929, State Park Commission began to wrestle with the complexities of acquisition. Drury took on that responsibility.] In February and March 1929, the Save the Redwoods League turned over six parcels of redwood forestland to the State Park System These magnificent redwood groves—600 acres in all, worth about $77,000—had been acquired by the league through the generosity of many individuals, notably Mrs.
Recommended publications
  • Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park 16949 Highway 36 Carlotta, CA 95528 (707) 777-3683

    Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park 16949 Highway 36 Carlotta, CA 95528 (707) 777-3683

    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Grizzly Creek to provide for the health, inspiration and hanks to lumberman education of the people of California by helping T to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological Redwoods diversity, protecting its most valued natural and Owen R. Cheatham, cultural resources, and creating opportunities State Park for high-quality outdoor recreation. these acres of redwoods were saved for all time—to inspire, dazzle and awe many California State Parks supports equal access. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who future generations of need assistance should contact the park at (707) 777-3683. This publication is available park visitors. in alternate formats by contacting: CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369. (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Discover the many states of California.™ SaveTheRedwoods.org/csp Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park 16949 Highway 36 Carlotta, CA 95528 (707) 777-3683 © 2011 California State Parks G rizzly Creek Redwoods State Park Hokan and Yukian. Though distinct from Rancheria, offers a sense of seclusion and intimacy one another, they still shared many cultural maintaining that has endeared it to generations of traits. Ethnographers have codified this cultural and visitors. Nearly 30 miles inland from the region as a Northern California culture area. ancestral coast, the lush, green, 393-acre park is Native groups traded with each other; local ties while an unspoiled gem. Towering ancient objects such as ceremonial blades and shell retaining and redwoods guard three separate parcels of beads have been identified as far away as practicing unspoiled riverfront.
  • FINAL Little Lake Valley Groundwater Management Plan

    FINAL Little Lake Valley Groundwater Management Plan

    LITTLE LAKE VALLEY GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Draft PREPARED FOR CITY OF WILLITS August 18, 2020 City of Willits Contact: Andrea Trincado, Project Manager City of Willits Engineering Department Prepared by: LACO Associates 776 S. State St., Suite 103 Ukiah, California 95482 (707) 462-0222 LACO Project No. 8509.07 Little Lake Valley Groundwater Management Plan FINAL DRAFT Prepared for City of Willits TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ......................................... 5 1.2 Background and Legal Authority for Local Groundwater Management ................................. 5 1.3 Plan Components .............................................. 7 1.4 Plan Development Process ................................. 7 1.5 Previous Studies .............................................. 9 2.0 Public Outreach and Involvement ............................ 10 2.1 Public Workshops ........................................... 11 2.2 Issues of Concern to the Public ........................ 12 3.0 Study Area 12 3.1 Location and Description ................................. 12 3.2 Physical Geography and Geology ..................... 13 3.2.1 Geologic Formations ............................. 15 3.3 Climate 15 3.4 Land Use and Population ................................. 18 3.5 Water Use 21 3.5.1 Municipal Water Use ............................ 21 3.5.2 Rural Water Use .................................. 23 3.5.3 Tribal Water Use ................................. 23 3.5.4 Environmental Water Use ....................... 23 4.0 Hydrogeology 23 4.1 Principal Aquifers ......................................... 23 4.1.1 Aquifer I – Holocene Alluvium ................ 24 August 18, 2020 Page 1 of 49 Little Lake Valley Groundwater Management Plan FINAL DRAFT Prepared for City of Willits 4.1.2 Aquifer II – Pliocene to Pleistocene Continental Basin Deposits ..................... 25 4.1.3 Jurassic-Cretaceous Franciscan Complex .. 26 4.2 Recharge Sources ........................................... 27 4.3 Historic Variations in Groundwater Levels ........
  • North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday Project the Original

    North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday Project the Original

    The following is reproduced with permission of the author from its source at: http://japanfocus.org/-Peter_Dale-Scott/3491 Additional links and annotations provided by David Ratcliffe. North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday Project: The Original Congressional Cover Up of Continuity- of-Government Planning by Peter Dale Scott The Asia-Pacific Journal Vol 9, Issue 8 No 1 21 February 2011 If ever the constitutional democracy of the United States is overthrown, we now have a better idea of how this is likely to be done. That may be the most important contribution of the recent Iran-contra congressional hearings. —Theodore Draper, “The Rise of the American Junta,” New York Review of Books, October 8, 1987. In 1989 I published the following article, “Northwards without North: Bush, Counterterrorism, and the Continuation of Secret Power.” It is of interest today because of its description of how the Congressional Iran-Contra Committees, in their investigation of Iran-Contra, assembled documentation on what we now know as Continuity of Government (COG) planning, only to suppress or misrepresent this important information in their Report. I was concerned about the committees’ decision to sidestep the larger issues of secret powers and secret wars, little knowing that these secret COG powers, or “Doomsday Project,” would in fact be secretly implemented on September 11, 2011. (One of the two Committee Chairs was Lee Hamilton, later co-chair of the similarly evasive 9/11 Commission Report). Recently I have written about the extraordinary power of the COG network Doomsday planners, or what CNN in 1991 described as a “shadow government…about which you know nothing.”[1] Returning to my 1989 essay, I see the essential but complex overlap between this Doomsday Committee and the Iran-Contra secret “junta” or cabal described by Theodore Draper and Senator Paul Sarbanes within the Reagan-Bush administration.
  • Final Upper Main Eel River and Tributaries (Including

    Final Upper Main Eel River and Tributaries (Including

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX FINAL Upper Main Eel River and Tributaries (including Tomki Creek, Outlet Creek and Lake Pillsbury) Total Maximum Daily Loads for Temperature and Sediment Approved by date Original signed December 29, 2004 Alexis Strauss Director, Water Division Note: For further information please contact Palma Risler at 415/972-3451 and [email protected] or Dan Pingaro at 415/977-4275 and [email protected] Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1. Overview - 1 1.2. Watershed Characteristics - 2 1.3. Endangered Species Act Consultation - 4 1.4. Organization - 4 CHAPTER 2: PROBLEM STATEMENT 2.1. Fish Population Problems - 5 2.2. Temperature Problems - 7 2.3. Sediment Problems - 14 2.4. Water Quality Standards - 17 CHAPTER 3: TEMPERATURE TMDL 3.1. Interpreting the Existing Water Quality Standards for Temperature - 18 3.2. Temperature Modeling - 20 3.2.1 Temperature and Solar Radiation Modeling - 21 3.2.2 Selection of Scenario Corresponding to Water Quality Standards - 24 3.3.1 Loading Capacity and TMDL – Solar Radiation for all stream reaches - 26 3.3.2 Shade Allocations - 26 3.3.3 Margin of Safety - 27 3.3.4 Seasonal Variation and Critical Conditions - 27 3.4 Instream Heat TMDL – Van Arsdale to Outlet Creek - 28 3.4.1 Selection of Scenario Corresponding to Water Quality Standards - 34 3.4.2 Water Quality Indicators – Van Arsdale to Outlet Creek - 34 3.4.3 Instream Heat Loading Capacity and TMDL - Van Arsdale to Outlet Creek- 34 3.4.4 Instream Heat Allocations – Van Arsdale to Outlet Creek - 35 3.4.5 Margin of Safety - 35 3.4.6 Seasonal Variation and Critical Conditions - 35 CHAPTER 4: SEDIMENT TMDL 4.1.
  • Ave Reg-Form 2014-V2

    Ave Reg-Form 2014-V2

    Avenue of the Giants Marathon is proud to be an independently green event. Portland 466 miles, 9 hours K RACE DAY INFO la m a th Orleans RACE DAY EXITS Redcrest Orick 101 Southbound 101 101 use exit 667A South North EXIT EXIT Redw Weitchpec 101 Northbound . 667A 667 use exit o 667 . o T d ri n Trinidad Cr Hupa i ty e Parking Head e R v k . STAGING 26.6 10k/13 & FINISH Willow Creek Albee Creek START START McKinleyville Campground R D LL C R E E K BU Dyerville Redding ek Arcata ll Cre Bridge 146 miles Bu Blue Lake 3 hours 6.5 Miles Humboldt 1st Marathon Weott Bay Turnaround EUREKA BOL 10K HUM DT Turnaround A V M E a 3.05 Miles O d PARKING F Burlington T H Campground E Ri Parking is on the gravel G I v A e flats of the Eel River just N r T Fortuna S north of the staging area. Ferndale Arrive early, vehicles that 19.6 Miles are parked along the road Half Marathon Rio Dell HUMBOLDT sides will be ticketed. & 2nd Marathon REDWOODS Turnaround STATE PARK S . F E RACE DAY EXITS & ROAD CLOSURES rk e . l On Sunday, all north south race traffic must use Hwy 101 E / e R exits 5 miles north of the START / FINISH. l R iv M e The Honeydew, South Fork T iv r HWY 101 Exit Closures: h a e e to r Eel and the Rockefeller Forest Exits will not be used L le o for race day traffic, but will be open on Saturday.
  • William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, and HUMAN RIGHTS

    William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, and HUMAN RIGHTS

    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, AND HUMAN RIGHTS Interviews conducted by Martin Meeker in 2008-2009 Copyright © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and William Newsom, dated August 7, 2009, and Barbara Newsom, dated September 22, 2009 (by her executor), and Brennan Newsom, dated November 12, 2009. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
  • A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina

    A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina

    A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina U.S. House of Representatives 4 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Union Calendar No. 00 109th Congress Report 2nd Session 000-000 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Report by the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoacess.gov/congress/index.html February 15, 2006. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U. S. GOVERNMEN T PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON 2 0 0 6 23950 PDF For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COVER PHOTO: FEMA, BACKGROUND PHOTO: NASA SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA TOM DAVIS, (VA) Chairman HAROLD ROGERS (KY) CHRISTOPHER SHAYS (CT) HENRY BONILLA (TX) STEVE BUYER (IN) SUE MYRICK (NC) MAC THORNBERRY (TX) KAY GRANGER (TX) CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING (MS) BILL SHUSTER (PA) JEFF MILLER (FL) Members who participated at the invitation of the Select Committee CHARLIE MELANCON (LA) GENE TAYLOR (MS) WILLIAM J.
  • July 18, 1972 Bill

    July 18, 1972 Bill

    24260 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS July 18, 1972 bill. Of course, any motion to recommit Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, will the The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without the bill, if such were made, would be Senator yield? objection, it is so ordered. in order, there would be a time limita­ Mr. DOMINICK. I yield. Mr. ROBER'!' c. BYRD. I thank the tion on any such motion, under the re­ Mr. JAVITS. I should like to say to Chair. quest, of 30 minutes, and additional time the Senator from West Virginia that the ' could be yielded from the bill on any reason why we did what we did is that if PROGRAM motion or appeal. we have any amendment that we think Mr. DOMINICK. I thank the Senator. should go into the bill, which would affect Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. President, The PRESIDING OFFICER. Would the result of the voting on the substitute, the program for tomorrow is as follows : the Senator from West Virginia advise Senator WILLIAMS and I feel that if we The Senate will convene at 10 a.m. the Chair whether he has concluded his give adequate assurance to the Senate, After the two leaders have been recog­ unanimous-consent request? the Senate will take that into considera­ nized under the standing order, the dis­ Mr. ROBERT c. BYRD. Mr. President, tion in respect of its vote. tinguished senior Senator from Kentucky I ask unanimous consent that rule XII So I did not wish supporters of the bill (Mr. COOPER) will be recognized for not be waived in connection with the agree­ to feel that their rights have been prej­ to exceed 15 minutes, after which there ment for a vote on passage of the bill.
  • U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, 2008

    U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, 2008

    U.S. Government Printing Offi ce Style Manual An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government printing 2008 PPreliminary-CD.inddreliminary-CD.indd i 33/4/09/4/09 110:18:040:18:04 AAMM Production and Distribution Notes Th is publication was typeset electronically using Helvetica and Minion Pro typefaces. It was printed using vegetable oil-based ink on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer waste. Th e GPO Style Manual will be distributed to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program. To fi nd a depository library near you, please go to the Federal depository library directory at http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp. Th e electronic text of this publication is available for public use free of charge at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/stylemanual/index.html. Use of ISBN Prefi x Th is is the offi cial U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identifi ed to certify its authenticity. ISBN 978–0–16–081813–4 is for U.S. Government Printing Offi ce offi cial editions only. Th e Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Offi ce requests that any re- printed edition be labeled clearly as a copy of the authentic work, and that a new ISBN be assigned. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-081813-4 (CD) II PPreliminary-CD.inddreliminary-CD.indd iiii 33/4/09/4/09 110:18:050:18:05 AAMM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE STYLE MANUAL IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION AND AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PRINTER OF THE UNITED STATES Robert C.
  • Governor Newsom's Amicus Brief in Mcdaniel

    Governor Newsom's Amicus Brief in Mcdaniel

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CAPITAL CASE CALIFORNIA, No. S171393 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DON’TE LAMONT MCDANIEL, Defendant and Appellant. PROPOSED BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE HONORABLE GAVIN NEWSOM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT MCDANIEL Appeal from Judgment of The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Case No. TA074274 The Honorable Robert J. Perry, Presiding * ELISABETH SEMEL ERWIN CHEMERINSKY DIRECTOR, DEAN DEATH PENALTY CLINIC (ADMITTED IN ILLINOIS AND (SBN 67484) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) U.C. Berkeley School of Law U.C. Berkeley School of Law Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 [email protected] [email protected] Telephone: 510-642-0458 Telephone: 510-642-6483 Facsimile: 510-643-4625 Facsimile: 510-642-9893 Document received by the CA Supreme Court. Attorneys for Proposed Amicus Curiae THE HON. GAVIN NEWSOM TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPOSED BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE .................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................... 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 21 ARGUMENT ..................................................................................... 23 I. THE CALIFORNIA JURY RIGHT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD IN THE CONTEXT OF THE HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RACISM AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. ....................................................................................
  • County Profile

    County Profile

    FY 2020-21 PROPOSED BUDGET SECTION B:PROFILE GOVERNANCE Assessor County Counsel Auditor-Controller Human Resources Board of Supervisors Measure Z Clerk-Recorder Other Funds County Admin. Office Treasurer-Tax Collector Population County Comparison Education Infrastructure Employment DEMOGRAPHICS Geography Located on the far North Coast of California, 200 miles north of San Francisco and about 50 miles south of the southern Oregon border, Humboldt County is situated along the Pacific coast in Northern California’s rugged Coastal (Mountain) Ranges, bordered on the north SCENERY by Del Norte County, on the east by Siskiyou and Trinity counties, on the south by Mendocino County and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The climate is ideal for growth The county encompasses 2.3 million acres, 80 percent of which is of the world’s tallest tree - the forestlands, protected redwoods and recreational areas. A densely coastal redwood. Though these forested, mountainous, rural county with about 110 miles of coastline, trees are found from southern more than any other county in the state, Humboldt contains over forty Oregon to the Big Sur area of percent of all remaining old growth Coast Redwood forests, the vast California, Humboldt County majority of which is protected or strictly conserved within dozens of contains the most impressive national, state, and local forests and parks, totaling approximately collection of Sequoia 680,000 acres (over 1,000 square miles). Humboldt’s highest point is sempervirens. The county is Salmon Mountain at 6,962 feet. Its lowest point is located in Samoa at home to Redwood National 20 feet. Humboldt Bay, California’s second largest natural bay, is the and State Parks, Humboldt only deep water port between San Francisco and Coos Bay, Oregon, Redwoods State Park (The and is located on the coast at the midpoint of the county.
  • The Creative Society Environmental Policymaking in California,1967

    The Creative Society Environmental Policymaking in California,1967

    The Creative Society Environmental Policymaking in California,1967-1974 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Denning Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Paula M. Baker, Advisor Dr. William R. Childs Dr. Mansel Blackford Copyright By Robert Denning 2011 Abstract California took the lead on environmental protection and regulation during Ronald Reagan‟s years as governor (1967-1974). Drawing on over a century of experience with conserving natural resources, environmentally friendly legislators and Governor Reagan enacted the strongest air and water pollution control programs in the nation, imposed stringent regulations on land use around threatened areas like Lake Tahoe and the San Francisco Bay, expanded the size and number of state parks, and required developers to take environmental considerations into account when planning new projects. This project explains why and how California became the national leader on environmental issues. It did so because of popular anger toward the environmental degradation that accompanied the state‟s rapid and uncontrolled expansion after World War II, the election of a governor and legislators who were willing to set environmental standards that went beyond what industry and business believed was technically feasible, and an activist citizenry that pursued new regulations through lawsuits and ballot measures when they believed the state government failed. The environment had a broad constituency in California during the Reagan years. Republicans, Democrats, students, bureaucrats, scientists, and many businessmen tackled the environmental problems that ii threatened the California way of life.