DOCSLIB.ORG

Taking Stock 96

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taking Stock 96 Chapter␣ 6: 1995 and 1996 Canadian and US Data Compared LEGEND M Matched Chemicals/Industries A All Chemicals/Industries 6 1995 and 1996 Canadian and US Data Compared 6–10 Actual and Projected Percent Change for States with Largest TRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 269 Key Findings 185 6–11 Actual and Projected Percent Change for the Six NPRI and TRI Chemicals with Largest Total Releases 6.1 Introduction 185 and Transfers M 1996 272 6.2 Overview, 1995–1996 186 6–12 Actual and Projected Percent Change for Industries with 6.3 Geographic Distribution 194 Largest NPRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 275 6.4 Chemical Distribution 202 6.5 Industry Distribution 246 Maps 6.6 Projections 268 6–1 Percent Change in Total Releases: States and Provinces M 1996 195 Figures 6–2 Percent Change in Total Releases and Transfers: States and Provinces M 1996 196 6–1 Percent Change in Releases and Transfers, NPRI and TRI M 1996 186 Tables 6–2 Releases and Transfers, NPRI and TRI M 1996 186 6–3 NPRI Releases and Transfers M 1996 187 6–1 NPRI and TRI Releases and Transfers M 1996 189 6–4 TRI Releases and Transfers M 1996 187 6–2 NPRI Releases and Transfers M 1996 190 6–5 NPRI and TRI Releases and Transfers of Known 6–3 TRI Releases and Transfers M 1996 192 or Suspected Carcinogens: Facilities with Largest 6–4 NPRI Releases, by Province M 1996 197 Changes and All Others M 1996 207 6–5 TRI Releases, by State M 1996 197 6–6 NPRI and TRI Releases and Transfers of Metals and their Compounds: Facilities with Largest Changes 6–6 NPRI Releases and Transfers, by Province M 1996 199 and All Others M 1996 227 6–7 TRI Releases and Transfers, by State M 1996 200 6–7 Percent Change in Total Releases and Transfers 6–8 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Decrease for Primary Industries, NPRI and TRI M 1996 246 in NPRI Releases M 1996 202 6–8 NPRI and TRI Releases and Transfers: Facilities 6–9 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Increase with Largest Changes and All Others M 1996 247 in NPRI Releases M 1996 202 6–9 Actual and Projected Percent Change for Provinces with Largest NPRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 269 181 TAKING STOCK: North American Pollutant Releases and Transfers LEGEND M Matched Chemicals/Industries A All Chemicals/Industries 6–10 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Decrease 6–25 NPRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases in NPRI Transfers M 1996 203 and Transfers of Known or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 216 6–11 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Increase in NPRI Transfers M 1996 203 6–26 TRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases of Known or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 218 6–12 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Decrease in NPRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 203 6–27 TRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases of Known or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 220 6–13 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Increase in NPRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 203 6–28 TRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases and Transfers of Known or Suspected Carcinogens 6–14 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Decrease M 1996 222 in TRI Releases M 1996 204 6–29 TRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases 6–15 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Increase and Transfers of Known or Suspected Carcinogens in TRI Releases M 1996 204 M 1996 224 6–16 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Decrease 6–30 NPRI Releases and Transfers of Metals in TRI Transfers M 1996 204 and their Compounds M 1996 228 6–17 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Increase 6–31 TRI Releases and Transfers of Metals in TRI Transfers M 1996 204 and their Compounds M 1996 229 6–18 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Decrease 6–32 NPRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases in TRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 205 of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 230 6–19 The 10 Chemicals with the Largest Increase 6–33 NPRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases in TRI Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 205 of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 232 6–20 NPRI Releases and Transfers of Known 6–34 NPRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 208 and Transfers of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 234 6–21 TRI Releases and Transfers of Known 6–35 NPRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 209 and Transfers of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 236 6–22 NPRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases 6–36 TRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases of Known or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 210 of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 238 6–23 NPRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases 6–37 TRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases of Known or Suspected Carcinogens M 1996 212 of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 240 6–24 NPRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases 6–38 TRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases and Transfers of Known or Suspected Carcinogens and Transfers of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 242 M 1996 214 182 Chapter␣ 6: 1995 and 1996 Canadian and US Data Compared LEGEND M Matched Chemicals/Industries A All Chemicals/Industries 6–39 TRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases 6–54 Actual and Projected Change for the 25 TRI Chemicals and Transfers of Metals and their Compounds M 1996 244 with the Largest Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 274 6–40 NPRI Releases and Transfers, by Industry 6–55 Actual and Projected Change in NPRI Total Releases (US SIC Code) M 1996 248 and Transfers, by Industry (US SIC Code) M 1996 276 6–41 TRI Releases and Transfers, by Industry 6–56 Actual and Projected Change in TRI Total Releases (US SIC Code) M 1996 250 and Transfers, by Industry M 1996 277 6–42 NPRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases M 1996 252 6–43 NPRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases M 1996 254 6–44 NPRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 256 6–45 NPRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 258 6–46 TRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases M 1996 260 6–47 TRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases M 1996 262 6–48 TRI Facilities with Largest Decrease in Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 264 6–49 TRI Facilities with Largest Increase in Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 266 6–50 Projections of Total Releases and Transfers, NPRI and TRI M 1996 268 6–51 Actual and Projected Change in NPRI Total Releases and Transfers, by Province M 1996 270 6–52 Actual and Projected Change in TRI Total Releases and Transfers, by State M 1996 271 6–53 Actual and Projected Change for the 25 NPRI Chemicals with the Largest Total Releases and Transfers M 1996 273 183 Chapter␣ 6: 1995 and 1996 Canadian and US Data Compared Key Findings 6.1 Introduction This chapter examines changes in the Canadian and US data from 1995 to • Total releases and transfers reported to both Canada’s NPRI and the US TRI decreased from 1995 to 1996, 1996 for the matched set of compa- for the matched data set. The NPRI reduction was 5␣ percent; that for TRI was 2␣ percent. The greater rable chemicals and industries in both reduction in NPRI occurred despite an increase in the number of facilities reporting and the number of PRTRs. forms submitted, while TRI’s facilities and forms decreased from 1995 to 1996. • In the matched data set, NPRI releases decreased 11␣ percent while TRI releases decreased 4␣ percent. In both countries, however, amounts of listed substances that facilities reported transferring off-site increased—by 10␣ percent in NPRI and 3␣ percent in TRI. • In TRI, a majority of facilities reported reductions in releases and transfers from their 1995 levels, while in NPRI a slight majority actually reported increases. Facilities reporting increases, facilities newly report- ing in 1996, and those reporting the same amounts in both years all contributed a larger portion of the NPRI total than in TRI. • The three provinces and three states with the largest releases were the same for 1995 and 1996: Ontario, Quebec and Alberta in NPRI and Texas, Louisiana and Ohio in TRI. Facilities in Ontario and Texas also reported the largest reductions in releases from 1995 to 1996. • Facilities in these provinces and states also reported the largest total releases and transfers: Ontario, Quebec and Alberta ranked in that order in NPRI in both years (for the matched 1995–1996 data set). Texas led TRI in both years, but Louisiana moved from third in 1995 to second in 1996, ahead of Ohio. • In both NPRI and TRI, releases and transfers of substances designated as known or suspected carcino- gens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer or by the US National Toxicological Program decreased by larger percentages than other chemicals: by 13␣ percent in NPRI and 3␣ percent in TRI. • Total releases and transfers of metals and their compounds increased in both PRTRs: by 9␣ percent in NPRI and 18␣ percent in TRI.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legislative Proceedings
    HANSARD 16-13 DEBATES AND PROCEEDINGS Speaker: Honourable Kevin Murphy Published by Order of the Legislature by Hansard Reporting Services and printed by the Queen's Printer. Available on INTERNET at http://nslegislature.ca/index.php/proceedings/hansard/ Third Session THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PRESENTING AND READING PETITIONS: CNSOPB: Decision-Making Processes - Reform, Hon. D. Peterson-Rafuse....................................................................................1012 PRESENTING REPORTS OF COMMITTEES: Law Amendments Comm., Hon. D. Whalen .................................................................................................1013 TABLING REPORTS, REGULATIONS AND OTHER PAPERS: N.S. Health Research Fdn.: Anl. Rept. (2015-16) - Table, Hon. L. Glavine..................................................................................................1013 Econ. Dev. Comm.: Anl. Rept. (2016) - Table, Mr. J. Stroink .....................................................................................................1014 2 GOVERNMENT NOTICES OF MOTION: Res. 355, MacNeil, Hector - Gaelic Advocacy, Hon. R. Delorey .................................................................................................1014 Vote - Affirmative..................................................................................1015 Res. 356, Watson, Seumas: Scottish Gaelic Award - Nomination, Hon. R. Delorey .................................................................................................1015 Vote - Affirmative..................................................................................1015
    [Show full text]
  • (IRP) Report Volume 1 Nova Scotia Power Inc. July 2007
    Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Report Volume 1 Nova Scotia Power Inc. July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary........................................................................................................... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 NSPI RESOURCE PLANNING CONTEXT..................................................... 2 3.0 ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED ............................................................................ 7 4.0 IRP PROCESS OVERVIEW .............................................................................. 8 5.0 RESULTS AND IRP CONCLUSIONS ............................................................ 18 6.0 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 34 7.0 STAKEHOLDER COMMENT ON IRP.......................................................... 39 8.0 ACTION PLAN................................................................................................... 41 APPENDIX 1 - IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX 2 - NSPI SYSTEM DIAGRAM APPENDIX 3 - BOARD CONSULTANT COMMENT APPENDIX 4 - LIST OF FORMAL INTERVENORS APPENDIX 5 - IRP ANALYSIS FLOWCHART Executive Summary In collaboration with Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (“UARB”, “Board”) staff and its consultants, and with Integrated Resource Plan (“IRP”) process stakeholders, Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) has developed a long-term resource plan for the Board’s consideration. The recommended plan
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Investigation Report R06v0136 Runaway
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R06V0136 RUNAWAY/DERAILMENT CANADIAN NATIONAL FREIGHT TRAIN L-567-51-29 MILE 184.8, LILLOOET SUBDIVISION NEAR LILLOOET, BRITISH COLUMBIA 29 JUNE 2006 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Runaway/Derailment Canadian National Freight Train L-567-51-29 Mile 184.8, Lillooet Subdivision Near Lillooet, British Columbia 29 June 2006 Report Number R06V0136 Synopsis On 29 June 2006, at about 1650 Pacific daylight time, Canadian National freight train L-567-51-29, travelling southward on the Lillooet Subdivision, derailed a locomotive and a loaded car of lumber after losing control while descending the grade near Lillooet, British Columbia. The lumber car came to rest at Mile 184.8 approximately 1000 feet below the right-of-way. The locomotive came to rest at Mile 182.5, approximately 800 feet below the right-of-way. Two of the three crew members sustained fatal injuries. The third crew member was taken to hospital with serious injuries. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2009 Cat. No. TU3-6/06-2E ISBN 978-1-100-12770-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Factual Information .......................................................................... 1 1.1 The Accident.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Railway Magazine Since 1945 MARCH 1997
    Canada's Railway Magazine since 1945 MARCH 1997 Features this month Research and Reviews Transcontinental STEAM ON THE MET. A RAILWAY ARCHAEOLOGY THE RAPIDO 13 • Steam and electric excursions on the London • Stations in the news. • VIA to abolish conductors' job. Underground, with David Clark. • Railways to Temiscaming. THE PANORAMA IS DORVAL 196! DIVERSION 6 INFORMATION NETWORK . 12 • Washout at Conrad. • The CNR International Limited. • Changes in CN's entrance to Montreal from IN TRANSIT 17 • Sleeping cars. the west, by Michael Leduc. MOTIVE POWER 18 UCRS evening excursion lish a railway museum at the CPR John was the designer? We're going to start off the summer with a Street roundhouse in Toronto. • Furnishings inside the station? do-it-yourself excursion on a Friday evening. • Source of order board and external details? UCRS meetings Take any GO train from Union Station to . Staffing? Duties? The next meetings in Toronto will be at 7:30 Oshawa in the afternoon rush hour and join If you have any definitive information, please p.m. on Friday April 18, and Friday, May 16. us for an evening of train-watching on the contact Mrs. E. Heinrichs at 25 Stafford Meetings are held on the third floor at Metro platform at the Oshawa station. There are Lane, Kitchenei; Ontario N2G 3W5; phone Hall, on King Street at John Street, just west GO trains from Toronto to Oshawa between 519 748-5643. of St. Andrew subway station and a short 3:13 and 7:13 p.m., and we plan to be on the walk from Union Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Rolling Stock: Locomotives and Rail Cars
    Rolling Stock: Locomotives and Rail Cars Industry & Trade Summary Office of Industries Publication ITS-08 March 2011 Control No. 2011001 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Karen Laney Acting Director of Operations Michael Anderson Acting Director, Office of Industries This report was principally prepared by: Peder Andersen, Office of Industries [email protected] With supporting assistance from: Monica Reed, Office of Industries Wanda Tolson, Office of Industries Under the direction of: Deborah McNay, Acting Chief Advanced Technology and Machinery Division Cover photo: Courtesy of BNSF Railway Co. Address all communication to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Preface The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has initiated its current Industry and Trade Summary series of reports to provide information on the rapidly evolving trade and competitive situation of the thousands of products imported into and exported from the United States. Over the past 20 years, U.S. international trade in goods and services has risen by almost 350 percent, compared to an increase of 180 percent in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), before falling sharply in late 2008 and 2009 due to the economic downturn. During the same two decades, international supply chains have become more global and competition has increased. Each Industry and Trade Summary addresses a different commodity or industry and contains information on trends in consumption, production, and trade, as well as an analysis of factors affecting industry trends and competitiveness in domestic and foreign markets. This report on the railway rolling stock industry primarily covers the period from 2004 to 2009, and includes data for 2010 where available.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Industry Canada Recipients, 1982-2009 (Total)
    Major Industry Canada Recipients, 1982-2009 (Total) Top 12 Industry Canada Recipients, 1982-2009 2,500,000,000.00 Canada Foundation For Innovation Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Bombardier Aerospace 2,000,000,000.00 Genome Canada CAE Inc. 1,500,000,000.00 Ministry Of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Canarie Inc. 1,000,000,000.00 Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited SOCIETE GENERALE DE FINANCEMENT DU QUE 500,000,000.00 Groupe Mil Inc. (Le) General Motors of Canada Limited 0.00 Ministry Of Tourism, Culture And Recreation Applicant Legal Name Province Project Location # Accepted Total Authorized Combined Total CANADA FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION ONT. OTTAWA, ONTARIO 1 2,190,000,000.00 2,190,000,000.00 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP. QUE. LONGUEUIL, QUEBEC 38 1,842,111,840.00 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORPORATION ONT. MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO 1 3,397,239.00 1,845,509,079.00 GENOME CANADA ONT. OTTAWA, ONTARIO 3 840,000,000.00 840,000,000.00 CAE INC. QUE. VILLE-SAINT-LAURENT, QUEBEC 24 603,680,926.00 603,680,926.00 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS ONT. GUELPH, ONTARIO 3 579,534,702.00 579,534,702.00 CANARIE INC. ONT. OTTAWA, ONTARIO 11 477,330,145.22 477,330,145.22 BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE QUE. RVAL, QUEBEC 2 350,000,000.00 DE HAVILLAND INC. ONT. DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO 19 345,033,571.00 BOMBARDIER INC. QUE. SAINT LAURENT, QUEBEC 7 14,222,575.00 BOMBARDIER INC. ONT. NORTH YORK, ONT. 1 56,345,998.00 BOMBARDIER CANADAIR QUE. MONTREAL, QUE. 21 329,379,689.00 BOMBARDIER INC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Chemicals Listed Under 1997 TRI, NPRI and RETC† 1997
    Appendix A: A Comparison of Chemicals Listed under 1997 TRI, NPRI and RETC Appendix A A Comparison of Chemicals Listed under 1997 TRI, NPRI and RETC† 1997 CAS Number Chemical Name Nom Chimique Sustancia TRI NPRI RETC 50-00-0 Formaldehyde Formaldéhyde Formaldehído X X X 50-29-3 DDT DDT DDT X 51-03-6 Piperonyl butoxide Pipéronyl butoxyde Piperonil butóxido X 51-21-8 Fluorouracil Fluoro-uracil Fluorouracilo X 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophénol 2,4-Dinitrofenol X 51-75-2 Nitrogen mustard Moutarde azotée Mostaza de nitrógeno X 51-79-6 Urethane Uréthane Uretano X 52-68-6 Trichlorfon Trichlorfon Triclorfón X 52-85-7 Famphur Famphur Famfur X 53-96-3 2-Acetylaminofluorene 2-Acétylaminofluorène 2-Acetilaminofluoreno X 55-18-5 N-Nitrosodiethylamine N-Nitrosodiéthylamine N-Nitrosodietilamina X 55-21-0 Benzamide Benzamide Benzamida X 55-38-9 Fenthion Fenthion Fentión X 55-63-0 Nitroglycerin Nitroglycérine Nitroglicerina X X 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride Tétrachlorure de carbone Tetracloruro de carbono X X X 56-35-9 Bis(tributyltin) oxide Oxyde de bis(tributylétain) Óxido de tributilestaño X 56-38-2 Parathion Parathion Paratión X 57-14-7 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 1,1-Diméthylhydrazine 1,1-Dimetilhidracina X 57-33-0 Pentobarbital sodium Pentobarbital sodique Pentobarbital sódico X 57-41-0 Phenytoin Phénytoine Fenitoina X 57-57-8 beta-Propiolactone bêta-Propiolactone beta-Propiolactona X 57-74-9 Chlordane Chlordane Clordano X X 58-89-9 Lindane Lindane Lindano X X 58-90-2 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2,3,4,6-Tétrachlorophénol 2,3,4,6-Tetraclorofenol
    [Show full text]
  • Halifax, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 Standing Committee
    HALIFAX, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010 STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS 9:00 A.M. CHAIRMAN Ms. Diana Whalen VICE-CHAIRMAN Mr. Leonard Preyra MADAM CHAIRMAN: I’d like to call this meeting of the Public Accounts Committee to order this morning. We have many guests with us this morning and they are from the Department of Environment and the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, and our subject today is really a combined subject - we’re looking at environmental monitoring and compliance and the Sysco remediation project. So, both those items and only two hours on our agenda, so I’m going to get started very quickly with an introduction of our members and witnesses, if we could. [The committee members and witnesses introduced themselves.] MADAM CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much, and with that we’ll go straight to the opening statements from our guests. We’ll start with the Department of Environment and that would be Ms. Vanstone. MS. NANCY VANSTONE: Thank you very much, Madam Chairman, and good morning to you all. As you mentioned, there are two items on your agenda today that you invited Environment to come to your meeting for - the follow-up to the 2008 Auditor General’s Report on environmental monitoring compliance and also to provide information on our role in the remediation of the Sydney Steel Corporation and adjacent sites. 1 2 HANSARD COMM. (PA) WED., APR. 28, 2010 You’ve already been introduced to my colleagues who have come with me here from the Department of Environment, so I’d just like to make a very brief comment, first off to say that the Department of Environment appreciates the work and recommendations of the Office of the Auditor General because we’re committed to continuous improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greenbrier Companies 2000 Annual Report 1 Letter to Our Shareholders, Employees & Customers
    The Greenbrier Companies The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 200 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 5 0 3 - 6 8 4 - 7 0 0 0 w w w. g b r x . c o m 2000 Annual Report C o m p a ny Profile Operating from a strong base in North America, Financial Briefs R e ve n u e s Greenbrier’s goal is to enhance its leadership YEARS ENDED AUGUST 3 1 , (Dollars in millions) The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (NYSE: GBX) is position as a manufacturer and developer of a leading supplier of intermodal and conventional innovative rail freight equipment, while continuing (In thousands, except per share and unit data) 2000 1999 1998 freight cars and services to the railroad industry in to offer complementary services in railcar leasing, North America and Europe. Greenbrier operates in Revenue: refurbishment, asset management and maintenance. Manufacturing $ 528,240 $ 520,311 $ 451,706 two primary business segments: Manufacturing and Greenbrier’s plan is to grow its businesses by Leasing & services 91,189 98,225 88,655 Leasing & Services. investing in its core markets in North America and $ 619,429 $ 618,536 $ 540,361 The Manufacturing segment operates from by selectively broadening its strategic geographic 12 separate facilities in North America and one reach through increased market penetration in Earnings from continuing operations $ 14,354 $ 20,419 $ 20,332 in Europe. Through its manufacturing subsidiaries Europe and Mexico. Net earnings $ 14,354 $ 19,481 $ 20,332 in the United States and Canada, Greenbrier produces double-stack intermodal railcars, 2000 Highlights Basic earnings per common share: conventional railcars, marine vessels and forged Continuing operations $ 1.01 $ 1.44 $ 1.43 steel products and performs railcar refurbishment •Achieved record revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals
    April 20, 2020 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Services for Trenton Commercial Park Nova Scotia Lands Inc. NSLAND113 RFP No.: NSLAND113 Title: Monitoring Services for Trenton Commercial Park Closing Date: May 7, 2020 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 RFP CONTACT .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 DEBRIEFINGS ................................................................................................................ 2 2 INSTRUCTION TO PROPONENTS .................................................................................... 2 2.1 TIME AND DATE OF BID CLOSING .................................................................................... 2 2.2 SUBMISSION OF BIDS ..................................................................................................... 2 2.3 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 BID REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................... 4 2.4.1 Technical Proposal (65 Points) ................................................................................. 4 2.4.2 Financial Proposal
    [Show full text]
  • Good to Grow
    V21N6 2010:V20N3 2009 10/27/10 9:53 AM Page 8 Briefs Good to Grow Photo: Sandor Fizli NS economy blooming with economic opportunity A NEW WALL (shown above) in Dartmouth resource sector that we need to figure out.” Stephen Hartlen, head of Innovacorp, is looks a lot like an old-fashioned property Technology companies like Research in excited about Nova Scotia’s tech future. hedge. Green shoots poke out from a layer of Motion, the BlackBerry giant, already have a Innovacorp handles the province’s Nova sod and 7,000 plants, berries and flowers strong Halifax presence. Up-and-comers like Scotia First Fund to support emerging busi- combine to create a sensational seasonal Norex, which recently started building apps nesses in the life-sciences and technology display of al fresco art. The wall is alive, for Google from its Bayers Lake Business Park sector. Innovacorp’s High Performance Canada’s first living wall east of Vancouver. headquarters, are poised to take advantage of Incubation business model focuses on growing It’s joined by a green roof and other environ- Nova Scotia’s low operating costs and talented entrepreneurial ideas by providing infrastruc- mental innovations at the Nova Scotia pool of university graduates. ture, mentoring and investment. Community College’s Centre for the Built Connecting it all are people like Tim Burke “We’re seeing a lot of interesting opportu- Environment. Consider it the new Ivy League. and Stephen Hankinson, the brains behind nities… medical-technology devices coming “Inspire” literally means to “breathe in” Tether. Tether is a downloadable application out of the universities, out of the hospitals,” he and the living wall encourages Nova Scotians that lets SmartPhone users access their phone’s says.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Sustainable Energy Prosperity in Nova Scotia Pathways to Sustainable Energy Prosperity in Nova Scotia
    Pathways to Sustainable Energy Prosperity in Nova Scotia Pathways to Sustainable Energy Prosperity in Nova Scotia Part of the Atlantic Canada Sustainable Energy About the Authors Jamie Thompson, Bob Williams, Terry Waters, Coalition Pathways Series on Climate Change, Niina Luus, Alasdair Sinclair, Dan Roscoe, Mark Lead author, Brendan Haley is an energy co- Energy and Economic Prosperity Butler, Gerry Ternan, Meinhard Doelle, John ordinator with the Ecology Action Centre. Crace, Wayne Groszko, Aaron Smith, Penny © June 2007 the Ecology Action Centre He has an undergraduate degree in Economics Kuhn, Ruth Gamberg, Judy Lipp, Megan Leslie, Extracts of this publication may be used for educa- from Dalhousie University and a Masters in Michael Stoddard and Clare Demerse. tional or other informational purposes provided the Environmental Studies (Ecological Economics) Ecology Action Centre is acknowledged. from York University, where his research con- Any errors, omissions or opinions expressed in centrated on “green industrial policy”. Brendan this report are the responsibility of the Ecology About Us has written and spoken on issues related to eco- Action Centre alone. logical economics, climate change policy, energy We would also like to thank Hammerhead Atlantic Canada Sustainable Energy Coalition efficiency, labour union roles in environmental Design for designing the cover and layout of this The Atlantic Canada Sustainable Energy innovation, and energy poverty. document. Coalition is an alliance of four community-based environmental organizations that offer expertise Transportation author, Stephanie Sodero is a Printed on 100% post-consumer recycled paper, in policy research and analysis, project implemen- sustainable transportation coordinator at the FSC certified paper. tation, and public education: the Ecology Action Ecology Action Centre.
    [Show full text]