DOCSLIB.ORG

In Sid E Th Is Issu E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Sid E Th Is Issu E WWW.LP.ORG M i n i M u M G o v e r n M e n t • M a x i M u M F r e e d o M The Party of Principle™ Order Quiz Door Hangers on Page 7 August 2010 The Official Newspaper of the Libertarian Party Volume 40, Issue 3 Meet Your 2010 Libertarian Party Candidates - Page 7 Redpath Takes Top Honors at Convention - Page 8 Chairman’s LPLibertarians Launch News Quiz Across America Corner by Arthur DiBianca courage people to visit the LP website to ..................Page 2 join the party. I want to put every willing Libertarian “One of the things that has always in America to work!” says Wes Bene- frustrated me is when people contacted the Letters to the “dict, executive director of the Liber- Libertarian Party offering to volunteer, but Editor tarian National Committee. we didn’t have a good way to put them to .................Page 3 The LP is implementing a plan to dis- work,” said Benedict. “This has proved to tribute Libertarian door hangers to volun- be a great, simple way for both new and teers nationwide. The effort is titled “Quiz long-time Libertarian volunteers to pro- Across America.” mote our party.” State Affiliate In each of the 2006 and 2008 elec- While the Libertarian Party is al- News tion years, while Benedict served as the ways looking for new candidates and ..................Page 5 executive director of the Libertarian Party party officers, those activities can require of Texas, the state party printed and distrib- a significant investment of time, and lots uted about 200,000 Libertarian door hang- of people aren’t able to make such a big ers. “In 2010, I’m hoping we can send at commitment. “Putting up 200 door hang- What Have You least a million of these all across America,” ers just takes three or four hours in an aver- Missed at LP.org? said Benedict. age urban or suburban neighborhood,” said ...............Page 16 The door hangers feature the World’s Inside this Issue Smallest Political Quiz and brief informa- ...continued on page 6 tion about the Libertarian Party. They en- See larger images inside on page 6. PERMIT NO. 1541 NO. PERMIT Washington, DC 20037 DC Washington, OKLA CITY, OK CITY, OKLA 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 200 Suite NW, Avenue Virginia 2600 U.S. POSTAGE PAID POSTAGE U.S. Libertarian National Committee, Inc. Committee, National Libertarian NON PROFIT ORG PROFIT NON PAge 2 the LibertAriAn PArty - www.LP.org August 2010 Folks who support partisan races see the Party and to the cause of freedom. Chairman’s Corner value in getting the name Libertarian be- So, rather than view these two strat- fore the voters and the media, and will fund egies as mutually exclusive, let’s change cause our membership numbers are slowly them voluntarily. that paradigm and see it as meeting the rising, I think we’re doing a slightly bet- Folks who support local winnable needs of both groups. An Introduction ter job of listening. And our finances are races will fund them voluntarily. And, of course, there are folks who by Mark Hinkle much improved as well. Another good Folks who support non-winnable rac- reside in both camps. sign we seem to be on the right track. es will fund them voluntarily. I’ve run for non-partisan office twice his is my As a service organization, which is Folks who support top-down man- and the State Assembly five times, and I first col- what the LP is, we have to serve our mem- agement (LNC directed projects) will fund am currently running in a special election Tumn as bers and donors—our customers—or they them voluntarily. in California’s 15th State Senate district. LNC Chair. go elsewhere. Folks who support grassroots organi- Plus I’ve given funds to winnable races Let me By the way, while serving as a re- zations will volunteer and fund them vol- (John Inks for City Council most recently) briefly introduce gional representative on the LNC these last untarily. and to non-winnable races, such as every myself. I’ve been two years and since becoming LNC Chair, Folks who want to run on a reform presidential candidate since John Hospers. involved with the I’ve become more aware of the talented platform with interim strategies will do so. And I’ve given money to ballot access, Libertarian Party and very dedicated staff we have at LP Likewise, radicals will run on a radi- even though California, where I live, al- since voting for Headquarters. We’re very fortunate that cal or anarchist platform. ready has ballot access. And I’ve written John Hospers for we have a very bright and very hardwork- The LP, as an organization, must sup- so many anti-tax and anti-bond measure President in 1972, and I officially joined in ing HQ staff. They know how to make port all of these strategies because that’s statements that I’ve lost count. 1974. I’ve been at this a long time. things happen. what our membership wants. Even if we So, let’s stop viewing these strate- I’d like to share a lesson I’ve learned Some folks want the LP to run more could, and we can’t, why would we want to gies in terms of what’s “right” and what’s along the way. During my time in the Par- candidates for local winnable races. Hope- stop anyone from pursuing a strategy they “wrong” or what’s “more cost effective” or ty, I’ve seen plenty of post-election blues, fully no one is against that idea. I certainly think will work and especially if they’re “less cost effective” and view them instead infighting, and finger pointing. I’ve heard am not. putting their time, money, and talent where as multiple strategies that have supporters just about every possible organizational And other folks, myself included, their mouth is? who are willing to support them. And we, strategy championed, from grassroots to want to see the LP run a Libertarian presi- Ditto for those who want educational as a service organization, need to support top-down and everything in between. dential candidate, even with little hope of campaigns or any other type of campaigns, all of our customers. If we don’t, they During my race for LNC Chair, I that candidate getting elected. Ditto for such as campaigns against tax or bond won’t come back. heard from a number of activists, and even U.S. Senate races, Congress, and most measures. In the long term, if one of those many more since being elected. Some want us state legislative positions, which are just To exclude any group is to weaken strategies is the “right one,” we’ll have to concentrate only on winnable (typically not winnable currently. the organization and prolong our fight for helped the cause of freedom. non-partisan) races, while others want to So, where’s the conflict and why the freedom. Nothing wrong with that, is there? show the flag in partisan races with the LP disagreements? If those who support winnable cam- Logo waving proudly. Here’s how I see it: some folks who paigns are more persuasive or more suc- My job as LNC Chair is to facilitate support candidates running for local office cessful, they’ll likely raise more money. as many of these strategies as we can, with see money spent on non-winnable races as So, they’ll get more of what they want. the limited resources we have available. a waste of money. Ditto for those who want the LP to Our members and donors really do But, since it’s not their money, why run more candidates for partisan offices. tell us what they want from the LP. Some- should they object to other people funding For the most part they are non-winnable times we listen well, sometimes not. Be- non-winnable races? currently, but they provide other benefits to Libertarian Party News Send newS, ArticleS, (ISSN 8755-139X) is the official eSSAyS or newspaper of the LP News PhotogrAPhS: Libertarian Party® of the United Libertarian Party States. Opinions and articles The Purposes of the Libertarian Party: 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 200 published in this newspaper do not The Party is organized to implement and give voice to the principles embodied in the State- Washington, DC 20037 necessarily represent official party ment of Principles by: functioning as a libertarian political entity separate and distinct from all Phone: (202) 333-0008 positions unless so indicated. other political parties or movements; moving public policy in a libertarian direction by building E-mail: Editor@LP.org a political party that elects Libertarians to public office; chartering affiliate parties throughout NATIONAL CHAIR: the United States and promoting their growth and activities; nominating candidates for Presi- Send AddreSS chAngeS to: Mark Hinkle dent and Vice-President of the United States, and supporting Party and affiliate party candi- Libertarian Party 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 200 dates for political office; and, entering into public information activities. 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20037 Washington, DC 20037 E-mail: chair@LP.org Phone: (202) 333-0008 L P N E W S EdITor: Email: members@lp.org Wes Benedict editor@lp.org VoL. 40, issue 3 the LibertAriAn PArty - www.LP.org PAge 3 credible economist I’ve read concur that Hoover, FDR and their misguided stim- The Time is Now Letters to the editor ulus programs and economic controls succeeded in prolonging what should he liberty movement is larger and Strategy Recommendations solutions).
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

11 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Libertarian Party National Convention | First Sitting May 22-24, 2020 Online Via Zoom
    LIBERTARIAN PARTY NATIONAL CONVENTION | FIRST SITTING MAY 22-24, 2020 ONLINE VIA ZOOM CURRENT STATUS: FINAL APPROVAL DATE: 9/12/20 PREPARED BY ~~aryn ,~nn ~ar~aQ, LNC SECRETARY TABLE OF CONTENTS CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 1-OPENING 3 CALL TO ORDER 3 CONVENTION OFFICIALS AND COMMITTEE CHAIRS 3 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE REPORT 4 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA FOR THE FIRST SITTING 7 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 1-ADJOURNMENT 16 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 2 -OPENING 16 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE UPDATE 16 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 18 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION QUALIFICATION TOKENS 18 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION SPEECHES 23 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 1 24 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 2 26 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 3 28 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 4 32 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 2 -ADJOURNMENT 33 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 3 -OPENING 33 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE UPDATE 33 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 35 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION QUALIFICATION TOKENS 35 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION SPEECHES 37 ADDRESS BY PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE DR. JO JORGENSEN 37 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 1 38 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 2 39 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 3 40 STATUS OF TAXATION 41 ADJOURNMENT TO CONVENTION SECOND SITTING 41 SPECIAL THANKS 45 Appendix A – State-by-State Detail for Election Results 46 Appendix B – Election Anomalies and Other Convention Observations 53 2020 NATIONAL CONVENTION | FIRST SITTING VIA ZOOM – FINAL Page 2 LEGEND: text to be inserted, text to be deleted, unchanged existing text. All vote results, points of order, substantive objections, and rulings will be set off by BOLD ITALICS. The LPedia article for this convention can be found at: https://lpedia.org/wiki/NationalConvention2020 Recordings for this meeting can be found at the LPedia link.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Edition
    The Search for Brave Candidates While many people in the party were thrilled about having a by Amber Jewell candidate like Jo Jorgensen, many others were extremely disappointed. They believed her to be a cookie cutter Libertarians often candidate, put into place as a safe option – and several ridicule those who believed that she wasn’t even the best option with which to support the two-party play it safe. On the flip side, her running mate Spike Cohen system. They strongly was seen as a force to be reckoned with. His presence showed oppose the idea of a certain amount of strength through his passion and choosing “the lesser of communication that made him a great candidate. two evils” and use the oppositional argument As a third party, Libertarians have to work harder than the old against everyone who parties in order to be taken seriously. This has created a claims that a binary challenge in choosing candidates. Many candidates want to be choice is the only way. seen as boisterous so that they can draw attention to the LP in For example, in this past an effort to bring in more members. Others may only want to election, most people be “paper candidates,” not actively involved in campaigning, seemed to despise the just to get names on ballots. But choosing a serious candidate choices of Donald that does not reflect that same boring tactics as the Trump and Joe Biden; so, Libertarians tried vehemently to Republicans and Democrats can be tough. remind others that there are other options.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Insid E the Cove R
    Libertarian Party Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief in D.C. Gun Case - Page 8 Members Sound-Off in “The Mailbox” - page 3 Committee Updates - page 13 February 2008 The Official Monthly Newspaper of the Libertarian Party Volume 38 / Issue 2 Torch Club Breakfast Ballot Access Status Increasing for Libertarian Party at Convention to By Sean Haugh cycle. The LPNC is joined in Honor Patrick Henry n Jan. 30, Wake Coun- this lawsuit by the NC Green ty Superior Judge Leon Party, as well as several Lib- By Andrew Davis O Stanback shocked ertarian candidates who were both sides of the lawsuit filed denied a spot on the ballot in his year’s Torch Club by the Libertarian Party of the 2005 elections. The trial Breakfast at the Na- North Carolina regarding bal- will probably take place in Ttional Convention is set lot access law in the state. The March, after which, either side to honor Patrick Henry, an in- ruling denied mutual motions may appeal to the NC Court of strumental figure of the Ameri- for summary judgment and Appeals and eventually the NC can Revolution. The “Patrick scheduling the case for trial. Supreme Court. Henry Breakfast” for Torch Although both the LPNC and Richard Winger of Ballot Club members will feature the state’s attorneys agreed the Access News commented, “It Gary Aldrich, president and facts of the case are not in dis- is encouraging that the judge founder of the Patrick Henry pute, the judge said he wants wants a trial, because it indi- Center for Individual Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Town Government Reports
    Term Expires Appointed by the Planning Board Planning Assistant Susan Hall – DOVER Land Use Director Courtney Starling – Town Government Reports Open Space Committee Carol Lisbon 2021 Appointed by the Warrant Committee Personnel Board Mary Carrigan 2022 2020 Capital Budget Committee Robert Andrews 2021 Andrew Ursitti 2021 “Appointee” denotes a voting member; “liaison” refers to a non-voting member. Report of the Moderator James R. Repetti It was quite a year! I postponed the 2020 Annual Town Meeting, originally scheduled for May 4, three times due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A truncated meeting was finally held outdoors on June 29 at 11 a.m. on the Regional School football field. We considered and voted only upon articles that the Board of Selectmen had determined as being essential to the ongoing operation of the Town. The meeting was adjourned at 11:19 a.m., moments before a major thunderstorm occurred. Many citizens and friends of Dover helped plan and implement the meeting in a manner designed to reduce the risk for attendees. We are very grateful to Dr. Kevin Ban, a resident of Dover, Dr. John Brownstein, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School, and the Board of Health for their advice in helping us structure the meeting to minimize the health risk for all attendees. Town Clerk Felicia Hoffman coordinated and implemented their advice in an exemplary manner to ensure safe social distancing for all attendees and those working at the meeting. In addition, Assistant Moderator David Haviland, Police Chief Peter McGowan, and all the con- stables, checkers, counters, pages, registrars, and police officers provided invaluable service in assuring the safety of all attendees.
    [Show full text]
  • March 10-11, 2012, LNC Meeting Minutes
    LNC MEETING MINUTES ROSEN CENTRE, ORLANDO, FL MARCH 10-11, 2012 CURRENT STATUS: AUTO-APPROVED APRIL 7, 2012 VERSION LAST UPDATED: MARCH 17, 2012 LEGEND: text to be inserted - text to be deleted CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 9:14am at the Rosen Centre in Orlando, Florida. ATTENDANCE Attending the meeting were: Officers: Mark Hinkle (Chair), Mark Rutherford (Vice-Chair), Alicia Mattson (Secretary), Bill Redpath (Treasurer) At-Large Representatives: Kevin Knedler, Wayne Allyn Root, Mary Ruwart, Rebecca Sink-Burris Regional Representatives: Doug Craig (Region 1), Stewart Flood (Region 1), Dan Wiener (Region 1), Vicki Kirkland (Region 2), Andy Wolf (Region 3), Norm Olsen (Region 4), Jim Lark (Region 5S), Dianna Visek (Region 6) Regional Alternates: Scott Lieberman (Region 1), Brad Ploeger (Region 1), David Blau (Region 2), Brett Pojunis (Region 4), Audrey Capozzi (Region 5N) Randy Eshelman (At-Large) and Dan Karlan (Region 5N) were not present. LNC Counsel Gary Sinawski was not present, but did participate by phone in Executive Session. Staff present included Executive Director Carla Howell and Operations Director Robert Kraus. LNC Minutes – Orlando, FL – March 10-11, 2012 Page 1 The gallery contained numerous other attendees including, but not limited to: Lynn House (FL), Chuck House (FL), Joey Kidd (GA), John Wayne Smith (FL), Aaron Starr (CA), Chad Monnin (OH), Aaron Harris (OH), Steve LaBianca (FL) CREDENTIALS Since the previous LNC session, the following events have occurred with regard to LNC credentials: • On December 21, Region 5N notified the LNC Secretary that Audrey Capozzi had been selected to serve as their regional alternate, filling the vacancy created when Carl Vassar resigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey — (Partial for Day 1)
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey — (partial for Day 1) Field dates: October 11-18, 2010 N=800 Adults; Margin of error=+/-3.46 *Due to rounding, not all percentages sum to 100 Interest and Engagement Q1. Are you registered to vote in the state of Texas? 1. Yes, registered 100% 2. No, not registered 0% 3. Don’t know 0% Q2. Generally speaking, would you say that you are extremely interested in politics and public affairs, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not interested at all? 1. Extremely interested 53% 2. Somewhat interested 36% 3. Not very interested 9% 4. Not at all interested 2% 5. Don’t know 1% Q3. Thinking back over the past 3-4 years, how often would you say that you have voted in local, state, or national elections? 1. Every time 43% 2. Almost every time 31% 3. Some of the time 12% 4. Once or twice 9% 5. Never 4% 6. Don’t know 1% Q4. How closely would you say you have been following the campaign for governor of Texas this year? 1. Extremely closely 34% 2. Somewhat closely 18% 3. Not very closely 13% 4. Not at all 6% 5. Don’t know 1% UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, Sept. 2010 Page 1 of 12 Retrospective Assessments Q7. How would you rate the job Barack Obama has done as president? Would you say that you… 1. Approve strongly 14% 2. Approve somewhat 21% 3. Neither approve nor disapprove 4% 4. Disapprove somewhat 6% 5. Disapprove strongly 53% 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic Costs and Benefits
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gros, Daniel Article — Digitized Version Regional disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic costs and benefits Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Gros, Daniel (1991) : Regional disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic costs and benefits, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 26, Iss. 5, pp. 207-213, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02928992 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/140311 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu SOVIET UNION Daniel Gros* Regional Disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic Costs and Benefits The disintegration of the Soviet Union as a pofitical entity has already begun. As an economic entity it is still intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Elections
    CHAPTER 7 MISSOURI ELECTIONS Johnson Shut Ins Photo courtesy of Missouri State Archives 586 OFFICIAL MANUAL When do Missourians vote? In addition to certain special and emergency dates, there are six official election dates in Mis- Missouri Voting souri: The statutes require all public elections be held on the general election day, the primary and Elections election day, the general municipal election day, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in Novem- Who registers to vote in Missouri? ber, or on another day expressly provided by city or county charter, and in nonprimary years on Citizens living in Missouri must register in the first Tuesday after the first Monday in August. order to vote. Any U.S. citizen 17 years and 6 months of age or older, if a Missouri resident, (Section 115.123.1, RSMo.) may register to vote in any election held on or The general election day is the first Tuesday after his or her 18th birthday, except: after the first Monday in November in even- A person who is adjudged incapacitated; numbered years. The primary election day is the A person who is confined under sentence of first Tuesday after the first Monday in August in imprisonment; even-numbered years. (Sections 115.121 (1 & 2), A person who is on probation or parole after RSMo.) conviction of a felony until finally discharged; or Elections for cities, towns, villages, school A person who has been convicted of a felony boards and special district officers are held the or misdemeanor connected with the right of suf- first Tuesday after the first Monday in April each frage.
    [Show full text]
  • December 6-7, 2008, LNC Meeting Minutes
    LNC Meeting Minutes, December 6-7, 2008, San Diego, CA To: Libertarian National Committee From: Bob Sullentrup CC: Robert Kraus Date: 12/7/2008 Current Status: Automatically Approved Version last updated December 31, 2008 These minutes due out in 30 days: January 6, 2008 Dates below may be superseded by mail ballot: LNC comments due in 45 days: January 21, 2008 Revision released (latest) 14 days prior: February 14, 2009 Barring objection, minutes official 10 days prior: February 18, 2009 * Automatic approval dates relative to February 28 Charleston meeting The meeting commenced at 8:12am on December 6, 2008. Intervening Mail Ballots LNC mail ballots since the last meeting in DC included: • Sent 9/10/2008. Moved, that the tape of any and all recordings of the LNC meeting of Sept 6 & 7, 2008 be preserved until such time as we determine, by a majority vote of the Committee, that they are no longer necessary. Co-Sponsors Rachel Hawkridge, Dan Karlan, Stewart Flood, Lee Wrights, Julie Fox, Mary Ruwart. Passed 13-1, 3 abstentions. o Voting in favor: Michael Jingozian, Bob Sullentrup, Michael Colley, Lee Wrights, Mary Ruwart, Tony Ryan, Mark Hinkle Rebecca Sink-Burris, Stewart Flood, Dan Karlan, James Lark, Julie Fox, Rachel Hawkridge o Opposed: Aaron Starr o Abstaining: Bill Redpath, Pat Dixon, Angela Keaton Moment of Reflection Chair Bill Redpath called for a moment of reflection, a practice at LNC meetings. Opportunity for Public Comment Kevin Takenaga (CA) welcomed the LNC to San Diego. Andy Jacobs (CA) asked why 2000 ballot access signatures were directed to be burned by the LP Political Director in violation of election law? Mr.
    [Show full text]