DOCSLIB.ORG

Argument, Rhetoric, and Transcendence: “The Adherence of Minds” Within the Discourse of Spirituality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Argument, Rhetoric, and Transcendence: “The Adherence of Minds” Within the Discourse of Spirituality University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Dissertations 2014 ARGUMENT, RHETORIC, AND TRANSCENDENCE: “THE ADHERENCE OF MINDS” WITHIN THE DISCOURSE OF SPIRITUALITY Gavin Forrest Hurley University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss Recommended Citation Hurley, Gavin Forrest, "ARGUMENT, RHETORIC, AND TRANSCENDENCE: “THE ADHERENCE OF MINDS” WITHIN THE DISCOURSE OF SPIRITUALITY" (2014). Open Access Dissertations. Paper 280. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/280 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! ! ARGUMENT,!RHETORIC,!AND!TRANSCENDENCE:!“THE!ADHERENCE!OF! MINDS”!WITHIN!THE!DISCOURSE!OF!SPIRITUALITY!! BY! GAVIN!FORREST!HURLEY! ! !! ! A!DISSERTATION!SUBMITTED!IN!PARTIAL! FULFILLMENT!OF!THE!REQUIREMENTS! FOR!THE!DEGREE!OF!DOCTOR!OF! PHILOSOPHY!IN!ENGLISH! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! UNIVERSITY!OF!RHODE!ISLAND! 2014! ! DOCTOR!OF!PHILOSOPHY!DISSERTATION! OF! GAVIN!FORREST!HURLEY! ! ! ! ! ! APPROVED:! Dissertation!Committee:! Major!Professor:!Robert!Schwegler! ! ! !!!!!!Jeremiah!Dyehouse! ! ! !!!!!!William!Bartels!! ! ! !!!!!!Nasser!H.!Zawia! ! ! !!!!!!DEAN!OF!THE!GRADUATE!SCHOOL! ! ! ! ! ! UNIVERSITY!OF!RHODE!ISLAND! 2014! ABSTRACT My study, “Argument, Rhetoric, and Transcendence: The ‘Adherence of Minds’ within a Discourse of Spirituality,” addresses the questions: What persuades Americans to adhere to contemporary discourses of spirituality? What persuades audiences to adhere to the experiential truths found with this discourse? Furthermore, how exactly do contemporary writers of spirituality adhere audiences to reasonable understanding and pursuit of a union with a higher power? Using Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s The New Rhetoric as a framework, I analyze how the persuasive machinery of current Catholic and Anglican spirituality texts guides readers to experience and understand a subjective union with an ineffable God, while simultaneously maximizing the social inclusivity of audiences. Contemporary Catholic and Anglican texts serve as a representative sample of the more general contemporary discourse of spirituality. Via close critical discourse analysis of 14 Catholic and Anglican texts spanning from 1983 to 2013, I explore the strategic cooperation of rhetorically argumentative schema found in these epideictic texts and unpack the implications. Overall, I find that the associative and dissociative schemas found in the contemporary discourse of spirituality can persuade diverse audiences into pluralistic communication, pragmatic contemplative action, and public service: all of which foster and strengthen human solidarity. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to all of those that made this dissertation possible. The University of Rhode Island Department of Writing and Rhetoric: Bob Schwegler for his support and feedback over the years; Jeremiah Dyehouse, Libby Miles, Nedra Reynolds, Mike Pennell, and Linda Shamoon for your wonderful insights and advice; Donna Hayden for helping me through so much paperwork and for such positive vibes. Dr. Kevin McClure and Dr. Bill Bartels for crucial perspectives that helped shape this project. The University of Rhode Island Department of English: especially, Stephen Barber, Ryan Trimm, Kathleen Davis, and Michelle Caraccia. Brittany Hirth for being such a strong woman, incredible thinker, and supportive partner. My mother for long ecclesiastical debates and for putting up with my philosophical fervor and jargon for so long. Jennifer Lee for being an awesome travel buddy and a dear friend. Some of our conversations were legendary – and helped me rethink parts of this dissertation. The “Little Family” for provided much needed escape and fantastic food, drink, and comradery: Sara Murphy, Mike Becker, Dr. Ben Hagen, Don Rodrigues, Kim Evelyn, and Judah Micah-Lemar. Prof. Richard Doyle for a serendipitous one-hour conversation in Lawrence, Kansas that put a number of cerebral gears in motion. It helped motivate this dissertation, my research interests, and my own spiritual practices. Prof. Richard Thames for a group discussion in Orlando, Florida, which helped me understand Kenneth Burke’s work from an entirely new perspective. Prof. Beth Bennett for productive feedback regarding the history of rhetoric. The RSA Institute for a learning opportunity of a lifetime. The RNF discussion groups at the 2013 CCCC. Tim Amidon for being a positive influence and an inspiring member of our URI 2014 cohort. John Jasso for assembling excellent conference panels and academic solidarity regarding the rhetoric of the Middle Ages and mysticism. Ora et labora! Dr. Jerry “J-Man” Hionis for being a model of spiritual commitment and spiritual practice. Gary Zimmaro for helping me keep my priorities straight; also for exposing me to (the brilliant) George R.R. Martin. The Song of Ice and Fire provided much needed relief during the dissertation process. Dean Hurley for being the rock of the Hurley family. Cheers! ! iii! DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my father, Ronald F. Hurley (1947-2010), who taught me to never give up – and to never settle for mediocrity. ! iv! TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………….......................iii DEDICATION.………………………………………………………………..iv TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………....v LIST OF TABLES...………………………………………………………......vi CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUNDS AND HISTORIES…………………….1 CHAPTER TWO: METHODOLOGY, METHODS, AND FRAMEWORK……………………………………………………………….41 CHAPTER THREE: FIRST ANALYSIS OF ASSOCIATIVE SCHEMA: STRUCTURES OF REALITY AND PRAGMATIC STAGING ……….…..67 CHAPTER FOUR: SECOND ANALYSIS OF ASSOCIATIVE SCHEMA: UNENDING DEVELOPMENT …………….…………………………….....95 CHAPTER FIVE: ANALYSIS OF DISSOCIATIVE SCHEMA: MOVEMENT AWAY FROM RELIGION…………………...…………….132 CHAPTER SIX: COOPERATION OF SCHEMA, IMPLICATIONS, AND AVENUES OF INQUIRY ………………………………………………….173 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………...210 ! v! ! LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: TABLE OF TEXTS ANALYZED…………………………..43-46 ! vi! CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUNDS AND HISTORIES Spirituality and Mysticism To begin plotting the overlaps of spirituality and rhetorical constructed discourse, I must first define the abstract term of “spirituality.” Generally, spirituality is the connection or relationship with something greater than the self; in the monotheistic Christian tradition, this connection to “something greater” is a connection with God. Defining spirituality more specifically is a tricky task. For example, as I will reference in the study, communicators of spirituality can use apophatic means of expression and argumentation: in other words, expression and argumentation “applied to knowledge of God obtained by way of negation” (OED). Why are apophatic means of expression and argumentation used? In the Christian tradition, God is ineffable; in other words, God is “too great for words; transcending expression”; the nature of God is “unspeakable, unutterable, inexpressible” (OED). For instance, Meister Eckhart, Christian spiritual authority and mystic of the Middle Ages, explains of spiritual truth, “If I have spoken of it, I have not spoken, for it is ineffable” (Katz 3). So how do the contemporary Christian authorities describe the nature of God if God is ineffable? This question was most recently asked of the current Monsignor of the Cathedral of Peter and Paul in Providence, Rhode Island; his answer was both simple and vast. He posited that, “God is Being as Idea” (Mancini) - a thoughtful answer, but again quite abstract. The ! 1! transcendent nature of God will be a component of this investigation; however, it is a component that is deliberately and appropriately abstract and difficult. And it is not just Catholic clergy that reveals these abstractions. Steven T. Katz of Boston University, scholar of Judaism and authority of spiritual linguistic expression, explains that “all language … is too impoverished” to capture to the “true unity of Being”: thus creating a communicative problem (3) - and regarding spirituality, these types of traits are all we need to know about the nature of God – for now. Theologians, philosophers, and postmodern critical theorists seem better equipped to philosophize about the overlap of God and Being.1 For the sake of this study, we need to understand that the Christian God is ineffable. What other traits factor into spirituality? Various definitions of spirituality surface in the Christian tradition, and these definitions generally emphasize individuals uniting with this ineffable God. Martin Laird, an Augustinian monk and theologian at Villanova University, describes Christian spirituality as “as grounding union between God and the human person (2); Donald W. Mitchell, professor of religion at Purdue University and an authority on Eastern and Western religious dialogue, defines spirituality as “becoming divine by sharing in that reality at the inner most core of our consciousness” (Mitchell and Wiseman 32); and finally, Thomas Merton, renowned Catholic monk who popularized spirituality in the 1960s, describes spirituality as “in and through and beyond everything that we are […] it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!Especially!relevant!in!contemporary!discussions!is!the!20th!Century!work!of! existentialism,!process!philosophy,!and!neo=orthodoxy:!Heidegger,!Levinas,!Buber,!Barth,!
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Hume and the Origin of Modern Rationalism Donald Livingston Emory University
    A Symposium: Morality Reconsidered David Hume and the Origin of Modern Rationalism Donald Livingston Emory University In “How Desperate Should We Be?” Claes Ryn argues that “morality” in modern societies is generally understood to be a form of moral rationalism, a matter of applying preconceived moral principles to particular situations in much the same way one talks of “pure” and “applied” geometry. Ryn finds a num- ber of pernicious consequences to follow from this rationalist model of morals. First, the purity of the principles, untainted by the particularities of tradition, creates a great distance between what the principles demand and what is possible in actual experience. The iridescent beauty and demands of the moral ideal distract the mind from what is before experience.1 The practical barriers to idealistically demanded change are oc- cluded from perception, and what realistically can and ought to be done is dismissed as insufficient. And “moral indignation is deemed sufficient”2 to carry the day in disputes over policy. Further, the destruction wrought by misplaced idealistic change is not acknowledged to be the result of bad policy but is ascribed to insufficient effort or to wicked persons or groups who have derailed it. A special point Ryn wants to make is that, “One of the dangers of moral rationalism and idealism is DONAL D LIVINGSTON is Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Emory Univer- sity. 1 Claes Ryn, “How Desperate Should We Be?” Humanitas, Vol. XXVIII, Nos. 1 & 2 (2015), 9. 2 Ibid., 18. 44 • Volume XXVIII, Nos. 1 and 2, 2015 Donald Livingston that they set human beings up for desperation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of Representation Jg. 04 Heft 02
    Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation (2018), Heft 7, doi.org/10.14220/jrat.2018.4.issue-2 The Kingdom, the Power, the Glory,and the Tawdry: Neoliberal Hegemony and the “Undoing” of the Demos Carl Raschke This article explores Giorgio Agambenscelebrated “double paradigmofsovereignty”, which introduces the Christian idea of oikonomia (“economy”)asafoundational polit- ical concept in Western thinking. It argues that Agambensfar-ranging discussion im- proves our understanding of how Foucaultsnotion of biopoweractually develops his- torically from the matrix of earlyChristian theology and how it becomes its own kind of “political theology” to undergird the contemporarydynamics,structure,and rhetoricof neoliberalism. FollowingAgamben, the argument also builds on his thesis that “eco- nomic sovereignty” today is cemented through the power of modern forms of media in much the same way that the critical theorists of the interwar period identified the “culture industry” as the genuine hegemon of capitalism. Finally, it devotes extensive attention to the work of the French social philosopher and media theorist Bernard Stiegler and his notion of “cognitive capitalism.” GiorgioAgamben;MichelFoucault;Carl Schmitt;Oikonomia;Trinity; Biopolitics; Pastorate;Karl Marx;Wendy Brown;Jean-Jacques Rousseau;Jürgen Habermas;Ber- nard Stiegler;Cognitive Capitalism;Neoliberalism;Social Media Carl Raschke is Professor of Religious Studiesatthe University of Denver and senior editor for TheJournalfor Cultural and Religious Theory.His most recent
    [Show full text]
  • MORAL OBJECTIVITY and the PSYCHOLOGY of MOTIVATION by Jude Ndubuisi Edeh a DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfilment Of
    Philosophy MORAL OBJECTIVITY AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MOTIVATION By Jude Ndubuisi Edeh A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Dr.phil) University of Münster Münster, Germany 2017 Dekan:Prof. Dr. Thomas Großbölting Erstgutachter: PD. Dr. Michael Kühler Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Reinold Schmücker Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 04.10.2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am immensely grateful to Michael Kühler and Reinold Schmücker, my supervisors, for their generosity with their time, energy and support. It’s not always a given that you find people who are both interested in your project and believe you can handle it, especially at its budding stage. I benefited tremendously from your constructive criticisms and helpful comments, without which the completion of this project would not have been successful. I owe, in addition, a significant debt of gratitude to Nadine Elzein for supervising this project during my research stay at the King’s College, University of London. Nadine, your enthusiasm, philosophical insight and suggestions are invaluable. I owe special thanks also to Lukas Meyer for hosting me in August 2015 at the Institute of Philosophy, University of Graz. This project would not have been possible without the friendship, support, and insight of a good many people. In particular, I owe a significant debt of gratitude to: Nnaemeka’s family, Anthony Anih’s family, Anthony C. Ajah, Uzoma Emenogu, Vitus Egwu. I will always remain indebted to my family for their undying care and love. I would never have made it this far without your encouragement and support. ii ABSTRACT This dissertation provides a solution to the tension of specifying and reconciling the relationship between moral judgement and motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • CARL RASCHKE University of Denver a PREFACE to THE
    CARL RASCHKE University of Denver A PREFACE TO THE GENEALOGY OF NEOLIBERALISM I. In my book Force of God: Political Theology and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy, published last year by Columbia University Pressi, I argue that the current global crisis of liberal democracy is a “crisis of representation.” In some ways, this statement is both tautological and gratuitous. The question of liberal democracy as we understand it historically is all about the problem of “representation.” Contrary to Rousseau’s effort to radicalize social contract theory with his postulate of the volonté générale, or “general will,” — which, as many critics have rightly noted, can easily be misconstrued as an argument for totalitarian control of all features of society (the Nazi Gleichschaltung) — we have lived through almost three centuries now when political theory, epistemology, and theology have been aligned around the late Medieval trope of a reflexive relationship between words and things. The trope of an intimate correlation between words and things — verba and res, les motes et les chose, Wörter und Dinge — as the framework for what in the history of philosophy has come to be known as “correspondence theory” harks back to ancient Athens, where democracy was born. The ancient crisis of democracy ultimately derived from the struggle between Socrates and the Sophists, between Platonism and the cheap kind of conceptual relativism associated with a crude nominalism, which the latter hawked in the agora. These epistemological debates, persisting in some guise for millennia, have never been esoteric preoccupations for cloistered thinkers removed from the “practical” affairs of Western political theory.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS PUBLICITY TEAM: Visit Ivpress.Com/Media Alisse Wissman, Print Publicity, at 800.843.4587 Ext
    A Future for Theology in an Age of Crisis Drawing from the academic genre of critical theory, internationally renowned writer and academic Carl Raschke introduces an agenda for theological thinking in this age of global crisis. In the interview below, IVP Academic editor David Congdon talks with Raschke about the origins and timeliness of this new “critical theology.” Many of our readers will be unfamiliar with the literature and debates that you engage in this work, ranging from Bultmann and Horkheimer to Badiou and Žižek. Could you set the stage for this work? What are the origins of what you call “critical theology”? Raschke: Critical theology is in many ways the ongoing twenty-first-century legacy of pomo theology. Postmodern theology, which started off in the 1980s as an effort to develop an Carl Raschke, author of immediate theological application for the tremendously influential philosophy (at the time) of Jacques Derrida, gradually became an extension of what Hent DeVries termed in the late Critical Theology: Introducing an 1990s the “religious turn” in continental philosophy as a whole. Right after the turn of the Agenda for an Age of Global millennium the more youthful cadres within evangelical Christianity became quite Crisis interested in these philosophical thinkers, and they became a significant readership for not only two of my earlier books (The Next Reformation, 2004, and GloboChrist, 2008) but also for a variety of other works by leading philosophical theologians, such as John D. Caputo and James K. A. Smith. Figures like Alain Badiou and Slavoj Žižek (the latter especially) are Find more from Raschke at leading stars in this galaxy of contemporary philosophical figures who have drawn a carlraschke.com considerable following and have become their own household names among academic religious thinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Francis' Reparative Vision: a Postmodern Hermeneutic of Catholic Uncertainty
    Durham E-Theses POPE FRANCIS' REPARATIVE VISION: A POSTMODERN HERMENEUTIC OF CATHOLIC UNCERTAINTY BURBACH, NICOLETE,MARGARET,NATALYA How to cite: BURBACH, NICOLETE,MARGARET,NATALYA (2020) POPE FRANCIS' REPARATIVE VISION: A POSTMODERN HERMENEUTIC OF CATHOLIC UNCERTAINTY, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13509/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 POPE FRANCIS’ REPARATIVE VISION: A POSTMODERN HERMENEUTIC OF CATHOLIC UNCERTAINTY Nicolete Burbach ABSTRACT Various readers of Pope Francis identify in his papal texts a striking openness to uncertainty, embodied in a rejection of fear and an embracing of alterity. These themes are united to a program of reform touching on doctrinal, ecclesiological, and pastoral matters; as well as attendant wider theological, philosophical, and affective issues. However, the general unsystematicity of both these readings and Francis’ texts themselves makes it difficult to receive those texts in a way that integrates these various themes.
    [Show full text]
  • CARL A. RASCHKE University of Denver VICTOR TAYLOR York
    CARL A. RASCHKE University of Denver VICTOR TAYLOR York College of Pennsylvania FROM ALCHEMY TO REVOLUTION: A CONVERSATION WITH CARL A. RASCHKE arl A. Raschke is professor of religious studies at the University of Denver and senior editor of The Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory. He is the author of numerous C books and articles that have defined the field of religious theory in the postmodern era. His early book entitled The Alchemy of the Word (published in 1979 and reissued as The End of Theology in 2000) was among the first serious studies of deconstruction and theology in the discipline. His recent books, including GloboChrist and The Next Reformation, have reached well beyond the academy to inform emerging Christian communities on the global stage. In 2012, Raschke published Postmodernism and the Revolution in Religious Theory, a work that resituates the concerns of postmodernism in the context of a new, revolutionary semiotics of the sign. Raschke is a contributor to the Political Theology blog (www.politicaltheology.com/blog) and regular contributor to the Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory (www.jcrt.org), which he was instrumental in founding in 1999. Victor Taylor: The Alchemy of the Word (republished as The End of Theology, 2005) was, as I have said on previous occasions, the "first" book of postmodern theology. That was in 1979 and no one at the time was really using the word "postmodern" in theology. "Deconstruction" was the preferred term. However, in that work, you do more than give a deconstructive reading of already available theological concepts and issues--that is you didn't treat deconstruction as a method of criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Kantian Intuitionism
    An Intuitionist Response to Moral Scepticism A critique of Mackie's scepticism, and an alternative proposal combining Ross's intuitionism with a Kantian epistemology by Simon John Duffy PhD The University of Edinburgh 2001 PhD Thesis: An Intuitionist Response to Moral Scepticism - Page 1 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 .................................................................................................................................................................... OUR BELIEFS ABOUT MORALITY .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 WHAT DO WE OWE COMMON-SENSE? .11 1.2 OUR EVERYDAY CONCEPTION OF ETHICS .17 1.3 THE CENTRALITY OF DUTY .24 1.4 THE IMPLICATIONS OF DUTY .32 2 .................................................................................................................................................................... THE SCEPTICAL ATTACK ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Derrida and the Return of Religion : Religious Theory After Postmodernism
    CARL A. R ASCHKE University of Denver DERRIDA AND THE RETURN OF RELIGION : RELIGIOUS THEORY AFTER POSTMODERNISM FTER POSTMODERNISM WHAT DO WE SAY ABOUT THE “RELIGIOUS ”? Do we A have a “religion without religion,” as John Caputo has suggested, or a distinctively “Derridean” religiosity—as well as a theology—that is manifesting in some quarters. 1 Or is something quite unanticipated—perhaps “unthought”—en route? As a surfeit of scholarship has reminded us in recent years, the “postmodern turn” that began a quarter century ago has opened wide the question of “religion” in ways that were inconceivable a generation ago. As the prophet of postmodernism Jacques Derrida himself has spoken profusely, if not delphically, about the “return” of religion, as if the religious and the philosophical constituted some strange sort of subintelligible economy that has through the unyielding pressure of textual “deconstruction” slithered forth into the light of theory. The religious in Derrida turns out to be its own kind of supplement—not the supplement of writing, but the supplement of “Latinity.” What does Derrida mean by the “Latin” as a metonym for the “religious?” According to Derrida, the “Latin” is the word for the West. The Latin is what overreaches with its sumptuous signatures of power and meaning; it is a perfection of the organizational, a vast economy of codings as well as a “re- territorialized”—in Gilles Deleuze’s sense—system of administration necessary for the expansion of a planetary socio-political apparatus. To be “religious” is to participate in an impersonal and invisible strategy of “pacification,” toward which the Roman empire with its brutal politics of deportation and detribalization always strove.
    [Show full text]
  • XX Век II. METAETHICS of the 20Th CENTUR
    Максимов Л.В. Сектор этики ИФ РАН (апрель 2016) Метаэтика. Избранная библиография. Часть II. – XX век II. METAETHICS OF THE 20th CENTURY (SELECTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY) 1. Bruce A. Ackerman Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven: YAle University Press, 1980) 2. Robert Ackermann "Consistency and Ethics" in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69, 1969. 3. E. M. Adams "A Critique of the Emotive Theory of Ethical Terms" in Journal of Philosophy 46, 1949. EMA complains that Ayer and Stevenson do not adequately analyse approbation, failing properly to distinguish it from mere liking. If we do analyse it we find it involves a cognitive element in the form of a judgement of rightness. So it is incoherent to analyse judgements of rightness in terms of approval. "Word-Magic and Logical Analysis in the Field of Ethics" in Journal of Philosophy 47, 1950. "The Nature of Ethical Inquiry" in Journal of Philosophy 48, 1951. "Cartesianism in Ethics" in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16, 1956. "Mr Hare on the Role of Principles in Deciding" in Mind 65, 1956. "The Nature of 'Ought'" in Philosophical Studies 7, 1956. "'Ought' Again" in Philosophical Studies 8, 1957. "Hall's Analysis of "Ought"" in Journal of Philosophy 55, 1958. "The Theoretical and the Practical" in Review of Metaphysics 13, 1960. Ethical Naturalism and the Modern World-View (London: Oxford University Press, 1961). "Classical Moral Philosophy and Metaethics" in Ethics 74, 1964. "A Defense of Value Realism" in Southern Journal of Philosophy 4, 1966. "Gewirth on Reason and Morality" in Review of Metaphysics 33, 1980. "The Subjective Normative Structure of Agency" in Regis, Gewirth's Ethical Rationalism "Rationality and Morality" in Review of Metaphysics 46, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • S41599-018-0129-1.Pdf
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0129-1 OPEN The future of the philosophy of religion is the philosophy of culture—and vice versa Mike Grimshaw 1 ABSTRACT This paper reads the future of the Philosophy of Religion via a critical engagement with the thought of Paul Tillich and diversions into other thinkers to support the main thrust of the argument. It takes as a starting point Tillich’s discussion of the relationship “ 1234567890():,; between religion and culture in On the Boundary (1967), in particular his statement As religion is the substance of culture, culture is the form of religion” (69–70). With (unlikely) diversions via TS Eliot and Karl Barth, the argument is developed through a re-reading of Tillich’s work on a theology of culture and in particular the statement from Systematic Theology III (1964b) that “…religion cannot express itself even in a meaningful silence without culture, from which it takes all forms of meaningful expression. And we must restate that culture loses its depth and inexhaustibility without the ultimacy of the ultimate” (264). Central to the rethinking of this paper is then the reworking of Tillich’s statement in On the Boundary that “My philosophy of religion …consciously remains on the boundary between theology and philosophy, taking care not to lose the one in the other. It attempts to express the experience of the abyss in philosophical concepts and the idea of justification as the limitation of philosophy” (52). While this can be seen as expressing the basis of continental philosophy and its creative tension between theology and philosophy, this paper inserts culture as the meeting point that holds theology and philosophy in tension and not opposi- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aristotelian Way of Life As Contemporary Moral Ontology
    UDC 111,177,141.5 Вестник СПбГу. Философия и конфликтология. 2017. т. 33. Вып. 3 S. V. Nikonenko1 THE ARISTOTELIAN WAY OF LIFE AS CONTEMPORARY MORAL ONTOLOGY The matter of the article is the study of the concept Aristotelian way of life as the concept of contem- porary moral ontology. Several moral philosophers are considered: A. Flew, B. Williams, A. Macintyre, S. Hampshire, J. L. Mackie, R. M. Hare, etc. According to Flew, moral rationality is only the capacity to act and to be responsible in moral way. Moral rationality does not define the essence of moral acts. Williams treats Aristotle as a moral anti-realist. Macintyre proposes practical rationality, unlike the “theoretical” one, that depends on actions and not only on thoughts. Macintyre thinks that practical rationality is changeable in history. He calls the stage of practical rationality a tradition. S. Hampshire’s criticism of Aristotelian way of life is considered. He thinks that Aristotle is a founder of moral sub- stantialism. The Aristotelian way of life is an ethics of individual perception. Ethical virtues must be conscious, but they are not rational in metaphysical sense. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is studied in the article. There are three main ideas of Aristotle that have been influenced the analytical moral phi- losophy: 1. The unity of all the virtues; 2. The practical character of morality; 3. The freedom of indi- vidual will. Aristotle taken in the mirror of analytic moral philosophy is an adept of practical thinking, incompatible with moral rationalism and substantialism. There are main characteristic features of the Aristotelian way of life: 1.
    [Show full text]