DOCSLIB.ORG

The Jean Seberg Story* GAD Rr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Jean Seberg Story* GAD Rr The Jean Seberg Story* GAD rr. HE JEAN SEBERG story burst into the news just know who leaked it. Other documents made available 1 a year ago. It was awful. Miss Seberg, an actress, since September, transcripts of wiretaps, make it rea- had died in Paris from an apparent overdose of barbi- sonably clear that the story about who impregnated turates. Her former husband, the author Romain Miss Seberg was true, that she was having trouble Gary, had charged the Federal Bureau of Investiga- carrying the child befoie that news was published tion with having driven her into the state of emo- and that she wasn't nearly so distressed by its publi- tional instability that led to her death. cation as Mr. Gary claimed. Back in 1970, or so the story went, the FBI had So the truth appears to be that the Los Angeles of- planted false rumors that Miss Seberg was pregnant fice of the FBI .recommended that accurate news of f with the child of a Black Panther leader to whom she' Miss Seberg's pregnancy be planted in gossip col- was not married. Mr. Gary was quoted,as saying that umns to sow dissension among the Black Panthers when Miss Seberg saw this gossip in print, she was so with whom she was involved. Headquarters in Wash- shocked she went into premature labor., and gave ington thought the idea was a good one but told Los birth to a dead child. She never recovered prom that Angeles to wait for two months. The idea was later experience, Mr. Gary said, and she tried to commit dropped, according to the FBI files, because of a deci- suicide every year on the anniversary of the still- sion that it would cause no dissension. birth. In the meantime, the story had been published by a A week after this story hit the television screens, Los. Angeles columnist. It was later published by the FBI released a set of documents, concerning the Newsweek. Both authors deny they got their infor- incident. Letting the documents speak for what the .mation from the FBI,And the agents in charge of the FBI had done, Director William Webster issued a matter deny they were the source. statement saying, "The days when the FBI used de- What difference does it make, now that the child, rogatory information to combat advocates of unpopu- Miss Seberg and the COINTELPRO operation of. the lar causes have long since passed. We are out of that FBI, which plotted to harm her, are all dead? Just buSiness forever." this: the news media gave the FBI a.black eye for the This sequence of events produced a wire service re- wrong reasons. When the invalidity of those reasons port, published in this and many other newspapers, is exposed, there is a danger that justified as well as that the FBI had "admitted" it spread the "gossip" in the unjikstified criticism will be ignored. _ question. That, in turn, provoked a new wave of de- As Director Webster well understands, the FBI had nunciation of the FBI, almost all of it based on the no business considering a plan to harm Miss Seberg' premise that the FBI had circulated a false story that by leaking personal information, true or false The seriously damaged Miss Seberg. We referred to the fact such a plan was recommended and approved,. matter on this page as in example of the way in even if never executed, was plenty bad enough—an-, which J. Edgar Hoover had used his power "to harass other demonstration of the arrogant and abusive way and persecute citizens charged with no crime." the old FBI viewed its power and license. That's Well, a batch of documents now being circulated where the Jean Seberg story—and the commentaries by Accuracy in Media makes clear it wasn't quite that based on it—should have stopped. It was unfair and way. Looked at closely, those documents, available. inaccurate—not to mention totally unnecessary for last September, show that the FBI didn't "admit" that the purposes of showing the evil of the COINTELPROj it had leaked that story; they indicate the FBI doesn't. operation. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J. Edgar Hoover: the Man and the Secrets. Curt Gentry. Plume: New York, 1991
    J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets. Curt Gentry. Plume: New York, 1991. P. 45 “Although Hoover’s memo did not explicitly state what should be kept in this file, ... they might also, and often did, include personal information, sometimes derogatory in nature ...” P. 51 “their contents [Hoover’s O/C files] included blackmail material on the patriarch of an American political dynasty, his sons, their wives, and other women; allegations of two homosexual arrests which Hoover leaked to help defeat a witty, urbane Democratic presidential candidate; the surveillance reports on one of America’s best-known first ladies and her alleged lovers, both male and female, white and black; the child-molestation documentation the director used to control and manipulate on of his Red-baiting proteges...” P. 214 “Even before [Frank] Murphy had been sworn in, Hoover had opened a file on his new boss. It was not without derogatory information. Like Hoover, Murphy was a lifelong bachelor . the former Michigan governor was a ‘notorious womanizer’.” P. 262 “Hoover believed that the morality of America was his business . ghost-written articles warning the public about the dangers of motels and drive-in ‘passion-pits’.” P. 302 “That the first lady [Eleanor Roosevelt] refused Secret Service protection convinced Hoover that she had something to hide. That she also maintained a secret apartment in New York’s Greenwich Village, where she was often visited by her friends but never by the president, served to reinforce the FBI director’s suspicions. What she was hiding, Hoover convinced himself, was a hyperactive sex life.
    [Show full text]
  • Burned Again the Critics
    98 THE CRITICS on the border between north and south. If they took that city, they could cross the Loire and invade the rest of France. That was the situation which Joan’s voices eventually addressed. They told this illiterate peasant girl, who had never been more than a few miles from her village, to go to Orléans, raise the siege, and then take the Dauphin to Rheims to be crowned King Charles VII of France. In other words, they told her to end the Hundred Years’ War. A CRITIC AT LARGE She did so. Or, by inspiriting the 6 French soldiers at Orléans, she provided the turning point in the war. How Joan BURNED AGAIN managed to get to Charles, and persuade him to arm her, and then convince the The woman at the stake is worthy of another five hundred years of obsession. Valois captains that she should join the BY JOAN ACOCELLA charge at Orléans is still something of a mystery, but at that point the French forces were so beaten down that they OAN OF ARC movies, understand- man finishes, he does up his fly and says were almost willing to believe that a vir- ably, have always been low on to his mates, “Your turn.” Thus begins gin had been sent by God to deliver them. J sex, but in the newest entry, “The the career of Besson’s Joan of Arc. In And once Orléans was saved, under her Messenger: The Story of Joan of past ages, Joan has been seen as a mys- banner, many of the French came to see Arc,” by Luc Besson, the French action- tic, a saint, a national hero.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Mental Illness in Women in Post-Classical Hollywood
    FRAMING FEMININITY AS INSANITY: REPRESENTATIONS OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN WOMEN IN POST-CLASSICAL HOLLYWOOD Kelly Kretschmar, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: Harry M. Benshoff, Major Professor Sandra Larke-Walsh, Committee Member Debra Mollen, Committee Member Ben Levin, Program Coordinator Alan B. Albarran, Chair of the Department of Radio, Television and Film Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Kretschmar, Kelly, Framing Femininity as Insanity: Representations of Mental Illness in Women in Post-Classical Hollywood. Master of Arts (Radio, Television, and Film), May 2007, 94 pp., references, 69 titles. From the socially conservative 1950s to the permissive 1970s, this project explores the ways in which insanity in women has been linked to their femininity and the expression or repression of their sexuality. An analysis of films from Hollywood’s post-classical period (The Three Faces of Eve (1957), Lizzie (1957), Lilith (1964), Repulsion (1965), Images (1972) and 3 Women (1977)) demonstrates the societal tendency to label a woman’s behavior as mad when it does not fit within the patriarchal mold of how a woman should behave. In addition to discussing the social changes and diagnostic trends in the mental health profession that define “appropriate” female behavior, each chapter also traces how the decline of the studio system and rise of the individual filmmaker impacted the films’ ideologies with regard to mental illness and femininity. Copyright 2007 by Kelly Kretschmar ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 Historical Perspective ........................................................................ 5 Women and Mental Illness in Classical Hollywood ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • How the FBI Used a Gossip Columnist to Smear a Movie Star | Film | the Guardian
    10/23/2018 How the FBI used a gossip columnist to smear a movie star | Film | The Guardian How the FBI used a gossip columnist to smear a movie star Duncan Campbell on a story that is only now emerging after 30 years Duncan Campbell Mon 22 Apr 2002 12.16 EDT More than 30 years ago, a small item appeared in a gossip column in the Los Angeles Times which suggested that a prominent American actress, who was married to a well-known European, was expecting the child of a leading Black Panther. The story was taken up by Newsweek, which identified the actress as Jean Seberg and her husband as Romain Gary, the French writer and diplomat. The Black Panther was Ray "Masai" Hewitt, the party's minister of information. Seberg was deeply upset by the story, gave birth prematurely and the child died after two days. The actress later committed suicide having never, according to her friends, fully recovered. Now, finally, the whole story of how a malicious and untrue story was successfully planted by the FBI and its director J Edgar Hoover is emerging. Seberg was an unknown teenage student from Iowa when she was chosen by director Otto Preminger to play the title role in the 1957 film of Saint Joan. Although it was not a hit, Seberg went on to find critical success in such films as Breathless, Lilith and Bonjour Tristesse. She also appeared in the 50s British comedy, The Mouse That Roared. During the 60s, she married Gary, and became increasingly involved in radical American politics, most notably as a supporter of the Black Panther party, which Hoover was then describing as the greatest threat to internal security in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • National Gallery of Art Fall 2012 Film Program
    FILM FALL 2012 National Gallery of Art 9 Art Films and Events 16 A Sense of Place: František Vláčil 19 Shostakovich and the Cinema 22 Chris Marker: A Tribute 23 From Tinguely to Pipilotti Rist — Swiss Artists on Film 27 Werner Schroeter in Italy 29 American Originals Now: James Benning 31 On Pier Paolo Pasolini 33 Marcel Carné Revived Journey to Italy p. 9 National Gallery of Art cover: Marina Abramović: The Artist Is Present p. 11 Films are screened in the Gallery’s East Building Audito- This autumn’s offerings celebrate work by cinematic rium, Fourth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Works pioneers, innovators, and master filmmakers. The ciné- are presented in original formats and seating is on a concert Alice Guy Blaché, Transatlantic Sites of Cinéma first-come, first-seated basis. Doors open thirty minutes Nouveau features films by this groundbreaking direc- before each show and programs are subject to change. tor, accompanied by new musical scores, presented in For more information, visit www.nga.gov/programs/film, association with a University of Maryland symposium. e-mail [email protected], or call (202) 842-6799. Other rare screenings include three titles from the 1960s by Czech filmmaker František Vláčil; feature films made in Italy by German Werner Schroeter; two programs of work by the late French film essayist Chris Marker; an illustrated lecture about, a feature by, and a portrait of Italian auteur Pier Paolo Pasolini; a series devoted to the film scores of composer Dmitri Shostakovich; highlights from the 2012 International Festival of Films on Art; and recent docu- mentaries on a number of Switzerland’s notable contem- porary artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Questions
    Discussion Questions Breathless: An American Girl in Paris by Nancy K. Miller 1 Consider the title of the memoir, Breathless: An American Girl in Paris. Breathless is also the title of Jean-Luc Godard’s 1960 nouvelle vague movie, starring Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg. In what ways was this movie important to Nancy even before she left New York to live in Paris? Why was Jean Seberg’s signature haircut so important to Nancy? Why do you think the author choose to echo the movie in the title of her book? 2 What vision of Paris in the 1960s did you have before you read the memoir? What personal experiences, books, movies, or songs contributed to your vision of Paris? 3 In the chapter “Waiting for Godard,” the author explains how she was driven to live abroad, in part, by fear: “France was my hedge against the Marjorie Morningstar destiny that haunted American girls in the 1950s: marriage to a successful man and then the suburbs with children” (8). Do you think twenty- first century American girls and women still share that fear of a conventional life? Why or why not? 4 How much did Nancy’s desire to live in Europe have to do with leaving home, and how much with her fantasies about Paris? What do you think about the deal her parents struck with her, that she would have to write them a weekly letter in turn for their funding her trip? (8) Do you think the letter-writing contract was a burden, or does the letters’ usefulness to the writer today make the deal worth it? 5 How did French people, especially French men, view American girls in
    [Show full text]
  • SAINT JEAN the Life, Loves, and Questionable Death of Jean Seberg
    SAINT JEAN The Life, Loves, and Questionable Death of Jean Seberg a play by Tom Baum ©Tom Baum 2017 Characters (in order of appearance) JEAN-LUC GODARD OTTO PREMINGER ROMAIN GARY ED SEBERG HAKIM JAMAL AHMED HASNI JEAN AGE 40 JEAN AGE 17 TO 32 1 (A dark empty space. Lights up on JEAN-LUC GODARD and OTTO PREMINGER. JEAN-LUC is wearing very dark sunglasses.) JEAN-LUC GODARD: Otto! Quelle surprise! I did not expect to see you here. OTTO PREMINGER: I felt I owed it to the girl. I hear you took some time off. JEAN-LUC: Ah oui, after my motorcycle accident. OTTO: In a coma, I heard. JEAN-LUC: For a week. It was glorious. Nothing happening. Like early Warhol. Did I ever thank you, Otto? OTTO: Thank me for what? JEAN-LUC: For launching two careers. OTTO: I know of only one, and my blood pressure never came down again. JEAN-LUC: Ah no, you’re forgetting my career. If I hadn’t seen her in Bonjour Tristesse, I might still be reviewing for Cahiers. OTTO: You exaggerate. JEAN-LUC: They say Preminger hates flattery, so I exaggerate. Did you two really not get along? I never believe what I read, unless it’s fiction. OTTO: Every interview she gave, she disparaged me. How about you? JEAN-LUC: Actors never like working with me. They want to be in control. Ah, look what just waltzed in. (ROMAIN GARY has entered. He looks deathly pale.) OTTO: Who is that? 2 JEAN-LUC: Romain Gary? The novelist and flying ace? OTTO: Oh yes, we met in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 Min.)
    February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 min.) DIRECTED BY Jean-Luc Godard WRITING François Truffaut and Claude Chabrol (original scenario), Jean-Luc Godard (screenplay) PRODUCER Georges de Beauregard MUSIC Martial Solal CINEMATOGRAPHY Raoul Coutard FILM EDITING Cécile Decugis CAST Jean Seberg...Patricia Franchini Jean-Paul Belmondo...Michel Poiccard / Laszlo Kovacs Daniel Boulanger...Police Inspector Vital Henri-Jacques Huet...Antonio Berrutti Roger Hanin...Carl Zubart Van Doude...Himself Claude Mansard...Claudius Mansard play of shot-reverse shot' used in many Hollywood productions” Liliane Dreyfus...Liliane / Minouche (as Liliane David) (NewWaveFilm.com). In the article, Godard “praised the use of Michel Fabre...Police Inspector #2 shot-reverse shot as crucial to conveying a character’s mental Jean-Pierre Melville...Parvulesco the Writer point of view and their inner life.” In 1956, after returning to Jean-Luc Godard...The Snitch Paris from Switzerland and making his first two films, Godard Richard Balducci...Tolmatchoff returned to find that Cahiers du cinema, led by Francois Truffaut, André S. Labarthe...Journalist at Orly had become the leading film publication in France. Godard François Moreuil...Journalist at Orly would once again join the fray of French film enthusiasts championing the techniques of Hollywood auteurs like JEAN-LUC GODARD (b. December 3, 1930 in Paris, France) Hitchcock and Hawks, contributing articles “on some of his once said “All great fiction films tend toward documentary, just favorite auteurs such as Otto Preminger and Nicholas Ray” and as all great documentaries tend toward fiction.” Godard began his continuing “his theoretical debate with André Bazin” who film career with a short, which he directed, wrote, edited, acted “continued to commend the long take for its approximation to in, and did cinematography for.
    [Show full text]
  • COINTELPRO: the Untold American Story
    COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story By Paul Wolf with contributions from Robert Boyle, Bob Brown, Tom Burghardt, Noam Chomsky, Ward Churchill, Kathleen Cleaver, Bruce Ellison, Cynthia McKinney, Nkechi Taifa, Laura Whitehorn, Nicholas Wilson, and Howard Zinn. Presented to U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson at the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa by the members of the Congressional Black Caucus attending the conference: Donna Christianson, John Conyers, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Barbara Lee, Sheila Jackson Lee, Cynthia McKinney, and Diane Watson, September 1, 2001. Table of Contents Overview Victimization COINTELPRO Techniques Murder and Assassination Agents Provocateurs The Ku Klux Klan The Secret Army Organization Snitch Jacketing The Subversion of the Press Political Prisoners Leonard Peltier Mumia Abu Jamal Geronimo ji Jaga Pratt Dhoruba Bin Wahad Marshall Eddie Conway Justice Hangs in the Balance Appendix: The Legacy of COINTELPRO CISPES The Judi Bari Bombing Bibliography Overview We're here to talk about the FBI and U.S. democracy because here we have this peculiar situation that we live in a democratic country - everybody knows that, everybody says it, it's repeated, it's dinned into our ears a thousand times, you grow up, you pledge allegiance, you salute the flag, you hail democracy, you look at the totalitarian states, you read the history of tyrannies, and here is the beacon light of democracy. And, of course, there's some truth to that. There are things you can do in the United States that you can't do many other places without being put in jail. But the United States is a very complex system.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiction and Newsreel Documentary in Godard's Cinema
    Fiction and Newsreel Documentary in Godard’s Cinema PIETRO GIOVANNOLI DOCUMENTARY AND FICTION. AN EMBLEMATIC LEGEND There is a legend that Godard would have been one of the special guests in the live broadcast of the Moon landing on the First National French channel (ORTF1) and that he would have pretended that the world-wide televised images were just a really convincing fake (“ce direct est un faux”; “ce qu’on voit c’est un film monsieur”).1 These phrases, which presumably were never uttered by Godard—who, in his most violent Marxist-Maoist period, would have been a very unlikely guest for such an event—are nev- ertheless emblematic of the close relationship that Godard’s cinema main- tains with both fiction and documentary or—more specifically to the sub- ject of our volume—to newsreel cinema. A dozen years later the successful mission of the Apollo 11, Godard, guest of Jean-Luis Burgat at the live tap- 1 Guillas 2009, Hansen-Løve 2010. Following Karel 2003: 5, Godard would have expressed his doubts in the “journal de TF1”. – In an interview with A. Fleischer (director of MORCEAUX DE CONVERSATIONS AVEC JEAN-LUC GODARD), when asked if “Le commentaire de Jean-Luc Godard sur la non-vérité de l’homme sur la Lune est-il confirmé?” Fleischer answered “Godard est capable de toutes sortes de provocations, y compris sur des thèmes plus graves. On a parlé même d’une certaine forme de négationnisme chez lui. Dans ce cas, il pourrait en effet nier l’homme sur la Lune, puisque cet homme est américain” (Fleischer 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • K • Jean Seberg's Paris Burial
    .• •■••'-'. • .• , FBI. S read Gossip About Baby • Seberg n, g,-t- k a d Proa person send a note to Hollywood col- The FBI admitted yesterday that in umnists about Seberg. The proposed 1970 it spread gossip that actress Jean Mei-no Says Bureau note would read as follows: Seberg, who committed suicide re- cently, had become pregnant by a Tried to Cheapen Her "I was just thinking about you and Member of the Black Panther Party. remembered I still owe you a favor. The bureau released an internal So I was in Paris last week and ran memo that showed it had sought to bat advocates of unpopular causes into Jean Seberg who was heavy discredit Seberg because she supported have long since passed. We are out with baby. I thought she and Romain the black nationalist cause. that business forever." had gotten together again but she con- "It is felt that the possible publica- He said the FBI conducts investiga- fided the child belonged to (blank space) of the Black Panthers. The of Seberg's plight could cause her tions now only when tb,ere have been embarrassment and serve to cheapen charges of criminal conduct. dear girl is getting around."' her image with the general public," Government documents show that On May 6, 1970, the FBI, then under the memo said. in the memo, dated April 27, 1970, the the direction of J. Edgar Hoover, re- sponded that the idea was a good one. Her husband at the time, Romain Lbs Angeles office of the FBI asked Gary.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Rossen – in Flight by Richard Combs
    Robert Rossen – in flight by Richard Combs The purity of the meeting point of themes and forms excludes the possibility of a happy chance; everything leads one to believe that, after Lilith, Rossen, withdrawn from the world, waited for the same terrible gentleness that he had tamed to carry him off silently. He worked no longer, and practiced, he said, a tête‐à‐tête with the sun; this nonchalance finally won, after what detours, heightens the pathos of the last shot of Lilith, of the last shot of Rossen’s work. Vincent Bruce [Warren Beatty] advances toward the camera, ravaged, destroyed, broken, to murmur facing the audience the two syllables of despair: “Help me…”. This cry of distress definitively closes the work on the bankruptcy of illusion: the threshold is reached where the cinema confesses and goes beyond its original sin. Beyond this confession reigns silence. (Jean‐André Fieschi, Cahiers du cinéma, April 1966) In the credit sequence of Lilith (1964), a butterfly struggles to escape from a proliferating spider’s web of graphic lines and bars. To take this as an apt image for the career of Robert Rossen goes beyond the arguments of auteurism and lands in a dangerously precious realm of artistic transformations. Exactly what is called for here, however, is a theory of transformations, something that goes beyond the arguments of what is called the auteur theory. Lilith is a satisfying, not to say sublime, end to that career, one that develops so perfectly yet inexplicably from 1 what had gone before that it turns everything around – or leaves suspended in the air what the dramatist in an earlier Rossen would have embodied in clear‐cut terms.
    [Show full text]