Working Group on Seabird Ecology (WGSE)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Working Group on Seabird Ecology (WGSE) Oceanography Committee ICES CM 2002/C:04 Ref. ACME, ACE, E and F Report of the Working Group on Seabird Ecology ICES Headquarters 8–11 March 2002 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Participation.................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Terms of Reference......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Justification of Terms of Reference ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Overview by the Chair .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Note on bird names ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR BREEDING SEABIRDS IN ICES AREAS ..................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Results............................................................................................................................................................. 4 3 FOOD CONSUMPTION BY SEABIRDS IN ICES AREAS.................................................................................. 13 3.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Results and discussion .................................................................................................................................. 13 4 STATUS OF SEABIRDS IN THE NORTH SEA AND THREATS TO THEIR POPULATIONS........................ 14 4.1 Status of seabirds in the North Sea ............................................................................................................... 14 4.1.1 Data Sources ................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1.1 United Kingdom (UK) ................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1.2 Norway (NOR)............................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1.3 Sweden (SWE)............................................................................................................... 16 4.1.1.4 Denmark (DEN)............................................................................................................. 16 4.1.1.5 Germany (GER) ............................................................................................................. 16 4.1.1.6 Netherlands (HOL) and Belgium (BEL)........................................................................ 16 4.1.2 Methods for estimating population trends....................................................................................... 16 4.1.3 Trends in numbers of breeding birds .............................................................................................. 16 4.1.4 Trends in numbers of wintering birds ............................................................................................. 22 4.2 Threats to marine birds in the North Sea region ........................................................................................... 23 4.2.1 Fishery catches................................................................................................................................ 23 4.2.2 Fishery discarding practices............................................................................................................ 23 4.2.3 By-catch in fishing gear.................................................................................................................. 24 4.2.4 Mariculture...................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.5 Oil pollution.................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.6 Disturbance ..................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.7 Marine wind farms.......................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.8 Conflict with other species.............................................................................................................. 24 4.2.9 Predation by introduced predators .................................................................................................. 25 4.3 References..................................................................................................................................................... 26 5 REVIEW OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING SEABIRD VULNERABILITY TO OIL POLLUTION................. 28 5.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Studies........................................................................................................................................................... 28 5.2.1 King and Sanger (1979).................................................................................................................. 28 5.2.2 Ford et al. (1982) ............................................................................................................................ 29 5.2.3 Tasker and Pienkowski (1987)........................................................................................................ 30 5.2.4 Anker-Nilssen (1987)...................................................................................................................... 30 5.2.5 Camphuysen (1989)........................................................................................................................ 30 5.2.6 Speich et al. (1991)......................................................................................................................... 31 5.2.7 Carter et al. (1993).......................................................................................................................... 32 5.3 Discussion..................................................................................................................................................... 32 5.4 Recommendations......................................................................................................................................... 35 5.5 References..................................................................................................................................................... 36 6 EFFECTS OF MARINE WIND FARMS ON BIRDS............................................................................................. 37 6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 37 6.2 Use of marine areas by birds......................................................................................................................... 37 6.3 Importance of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea for birds............................................................................. 37 6.3.1 Internationally important bird populations in the North Sea and Baltic Sea................................... 37 6.3.2 Bird migration over the sea............................................................................................................. 38 6.4 Effects of wind farms on birds...................................................................................................................... 38 6.4.1 General overview............................................................................................................................ 38 6.4.2 Collision with wind turbines........................................................................................................... 38 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 6.4.3 Habitat modification ....................................................................................................................... 39 6.4.4 Disturbance and barrier effect......................................................................................................... 40 6.4.5 Secondary effects...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Runde Miljøsenter: North Atlantic Seabird Seminar
    North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015 Michael Hundeide (ed.) Runde Environmental Centre In cooperation with: Birdlife Norway (NOF) and Norwegian Biologist Association (BiO). Distribution: Open/Closed Runde Miljøsenter AS Client(s) 6096 Runde Org. Nr. 987 410 752 MVA Telephone: +47 70 08 08 00 E-mail: [email protected] Date: Web: www.rundesenteret.no 18.09.2015 Report Runde Miljøsenter Norsk: Nordatlantisk sjøfuglseminar 2015. Fosnavåg 20. og 21. April Rapportnummer: English: North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015 Author(s): Number of pages: Michael Hundeide (ed.) 52 Key words: Seabird ecology, Runde, North Atlantic, sand eel Sammendrag (Norsk):Rapporten er en gjengivelse av de temaer som ble presentert og diskutert på det internasjonale sjøfuglseminaret i Fosnavåg 20. og 21. april 2015: En rekke sjøfuglbestander har hatt en drastisk tilbakegang på Runde i senere år. Særlig gjelder dette artene: Krykkje, havhest, toppskarv, lomvi, alke, lunde m.fl. Med unntak av havsule, storjo og havørn som har hatt en økende tendens, har så å si samtlige av de andre sjøfuglartene gått ned. Denne situasjonen er ikke enestående for Runde og Norge, samme tendens gjør seg også gjeldende i Storbritannia, på Island og i hele Nordøst -Atlanteren. Selv om årsakene til krisen hos sjøfuglene er sammensatte og komplekse, var de fleste innleggsholderne enige om følgende punkter: 1) En vesentlig del av årsaken til krisen for sjøfuglbestandene på Runde og i Nordøst-Atlanteren skyldes mangel på egnet energirik mat (fettrik fisk av rett størrelse særlig tobis i Skottland, Færøyene og Sør-Vestlige Island) i hekkesesongen. Dette kan i sin tur forklares som en indirekte effekt av en liten økning i gjennomsnittstemperatur i havet.
    [Show full text]
  • FRAMEWORK for a CIRCUMPOLAR ARCTIC SEABIRD MONITORING NETWORK Caffs CIRCUMPOLAR SEABIRD GROUP Acknowledgements I
    Supporting Publication to the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program CAFF CBMP Report No. 15 September 2008 FRAMEWORK FOR A CIRCUMPOLAR ARCTIC SEABIRD MONITORING NETWORK CAFFs CIRCUMPOLAR SEABIRD GROUP Acknowledgements i CAFF Designated Agencies: t Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada t Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland t Ministry of the Environment and Nature, Greenland Homerule, Greenland (Kingdom of Denmark) t Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) t Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland t Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway t Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia t Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden t United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska This publication should be cited as: Aevar Petersen, David Irons, Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Yuri Ar- tukhin, Robert Barrett, David Boertmann, Carsten Egevang, Maria V. Gavrilo, Grant Gilchrist, Martti Hario, Mark Mallory, Anders Mosbech, Bergur Olsen, Henrik Osterblom, Greg Robertson, and Hall- vard Strøm (2008): Framework for a Circumpolar Arctic Seabird Monitoring Network. CAFF CBMP Report No.15 . CAFF International Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland. Cover photo: Recording Arctic Tern growth parameters at Kitsissunnguit West Greenland 2004. Photo by Carsten Egevang/ARC-PIC.COM. For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: ca"@ca".is Internet: http://www.ca".is ___ CAFF Designated Area Editor: Aevar Petersen Design & Layout: Tom Barry Institutional Logos CAFFs Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program: Framework for a Circumpolar Arctic Seabird Monitoring Network Aevar Petersen, David Irons, Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Yuri Artukhin, Robert Barrett, David Boertmann, Carsten Egevang, Maria V.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabird Harvest in Iceland Aever Petersen, the Icelandic Institute of Natural History
    CAFF Technical Report No. 16 September 2008 SEABIRD HARVEST IN THE ARCTIC CAFFs CIRCUMPOLAR SEABIRD GROUP Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of the Environment and Nature, Greenland Homerule, Greenland (Kingdom of Denmark) • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska This publication should be cited as: Merkel, F. and Barry, T. (eds.) 2008. Seabird harvest in the Arctic. CAFF International Secretariat, Circumpolar Seabird Group (CBird), CAFF Technical Report No. 16. Cover photo (F. Merkel): Thick-billed murres, Saunders Island, Qaanaaq, Greenland. For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.caff.is ___ CAFF Designated Area Editing: Flemming Merkel and Tom Barry Design & Layout: Tom Barry Seabird Harvest in the Arctic Prepared by the CIRCUMPOLAR SEABIRD GROUP (CBird) CAFF Technical Report No. 16 September 2008 List of Contributors Aever Petersen John W. Chardine The Icelandic Institute of Natural History Wildlife Research Division Hlemmur 3, P.O. Box 5320 Environment Canada IS-125 Reykjavik, ICELAND P.O. Box 6227 Email: [email protected], Tel: +354 5 900 500 Sackville, NB E4L 4K2 CANADA Bergur Olsen Email: [email protected], Tel: +1-506-364-5046 Faroese Fisheries Laboratory Nóatún 1, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Timing of Nest Departure in the Common Guillemot Uria Aalge
    Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Strategies for timing of nest departure in the common guillemot Uria aalge — Malin Kjellstadli Johansen BIO-3950 Master thesis in Biology May 2017 Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Strategies for timing of nest departure in the common guillemot Uria aalge Malin Kjellstadli Johansen BIO-3950 Master thesis in Biology Northern Populations and Ecosystems May 2017 Supervisors Tone Kristin Reiertsen, NINA – Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Nigel G. Yoccoz, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway Cover photo by Malin Kjellstadli Johansen Bridled common guillemot Uria aalge Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the help of certain people. First of all, I would like to start by thanking my supervisors, Tone Kristin Reiertsen and Nigel Yoccoz. Huge thanks to Tone for giving me the opportunity to study the extremely fascinating common guillemot. Thank you for taking me under your wings – and showing me how to be a better scientist and researcher both in the field and in front of a computer. And big thanks to Nigel for his statistical inputs and discussions. I would also like to thank Kjell Einar Erikstad for his help and support – yours and Tone’s brilliant minds working together gave me the support and knowledge I needed to finish this thesis. The laboratory work was done at Nord University in Bodø and Swiss Ornithological Institute in Sempach, and I would like to give my gratitude to Truls Moum and Susanne Jenni- Eiermann for analysing blood samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions and Management of the Stakeholders-Tourists-Trails-Environment System at Látrabjarg Cliffs (Iceland): a Comparative Study with Moher Cliffs (Ireland)
    Master‘s thesis Interactions and Management of the Stakeholders-Tourists-Trails-Environment system at Látrabjarg Cliffs (Iceland): A comparative study with Moher Cliffs (Ireland) Marie Jannie Madeleine Legatelois Advisor: Dr. Georgette Leah Burns University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, Mai 2014 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Dr. Georgette Leah Burns, PhD. (MU) Reader: Sigríður Kristjánsdóttir, PhD. Program Director: Dagný Arnarsdóttir, MSc. Marie Jannie Madeleine Legatelois Interactions and Management of the Stakeholders-Tourists-Trails-Environment system at Látrabjarg Cliffs (Iceland): A comparative study with Moher Cliffs (Ireland) 45 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2014 Marie Jannie Madeleine Legatelois All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, Reykjavík, Mai 2014 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. Marie Jannie Madeleine Legatelois __________________________________________ Student„s name Abstract Látrabjarg Cliffs (Iceland) are the biggest cliffs and sea bird colony of Europe. This site attracts an increasing number of international tourists. However, the current infrastructure presents on the site is not adapted for this tourism and the resulting pressure on the environment raises issues for the sustainability of this important site. Stakeholders are currently transforming Látrabjarg into a National Park and developing conservation and land-use plans to address these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015
    North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015 Michael Hundeide (ed.) Runde Environmental Centre In cooperation with: Birdlife Norway (NOF) and Norwegian Biologist Association (BiO). Distribution: Open/Closed Runde Miljøsenter AS Client(s) 6096 Runde Org. Nr. 987 410 752 MVA Telephone: +47 70 08 08 00 E-mail: [email protected] Date: Web: www.rundesenteret.no 18.09.2015 Report Runde Miljøsenter Norsk: Nordatlantisk sjøfuglseminar 2015. Fosnavåg 20. og 21. April Rapportnummer: English: North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015 Author(s): Number of pages: Michael Hundeide (ed.) 52 Key words: Seabird ecology, Runde, North Atlantic, sand eel Sammendrag (Norsk):Rapporten er en gjengivelse av de temaer som ble presentert og diskutert på det internasjonale sjøfuglseminaret i Fosnavåg 20. og 21. april 2015: En rekke sjøfuglbestander har hatt en drastisk tilbakegang på Runde i senere år. Særlig gjelder dette artene: Krykkje, havhest, toppskarv, lomvi, alke, lunde m.fl. Med unntak av havsule, storjo og havørn som har hatt en økende tendens, har så å si samtlige av de andre sjøfuglartene gått ned. Denne situasjonen er ikke enestående for Runde og Norge, samme tendens gjør seg også gjeldende i Storbritannia, på Island og i hele Nordøst -Atlanteren. Selv om årsakene til krisen hos sjøfuglene er sammensatte og komplekse, var de fleste innleggsholderne enige om følgende punkter: 1) En vesentlig del av årsaken til krisen for sjøfuglbestandene på Runde og i Nordøst-Atlanteren skyldes mangel på egnet energirik mat (fettrik fisk av rett størrelse særlig tobis i Skottland, Færøyene og Sør-Vestlige Island) i hekkesesongen. Dette kan i sin tur forklares som en indirekte effekt av en liten økning i gjennomsnittstemperatur i havet.
    [Show full text]