The Non-Jew's Korban

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Non-Jew's Korban בס“ד Parshat Emor 17 Iyar, 5777/May 13, 2017 Vol. 8 Num. 33 This issue of Toronto Torah is graciously sponsored by Shloimie and Annie Romberg z”l רויזל מרים בת יששכר דב הכהן for the yahrtzeit of Shloimie’s grandmother Rose Troster z”l פרענדל דינה בת יוסף and Shloimie’s aunt Fanny Weiner The Non-Jew’s Korban Rabbi Baruch Weintraub After Parshat Kedoshim taught us how Why write “a man” twice? The answer is to walk a very fine line. On one hand, to sanctify ourselves in the different to be found in the words of Rabbi Akiva the non-Jew’s spiritual effort is areas of life, the first half of Parshat (Menachot 73b): “’A man, a man’ – to acknowledged and sanctified; the Torah Emor deals with the holiness of the include non-Jews who may vow and emphasizes that his sacrifice is as holy Mikdash, those who serve in it, and volunteer burnt sacrifices as Israelites as any other, and therefore we must the sacrifices brought therein. In this can, but not peace offerings”. If so, we ensure that it is not blemished, as our context, the Torah teaches us the can now understand why the Torah offerings are supposed to be prohibition against bringing a separated the two types of korbanot unblemished. All nations are welcome blemished animal as a korban. This regarding blemishes: to teach us that in the house of G-d. On the other hand, law is presented in a very peculiar non-Jews can only bring burnt we must not turn the Beit HaMikdash way: instead of simply stating that no offerings. into a shared and combined effort. The blemished animal may be brought for peace offering, which represents a joint a sacrifice, the Torah separates the However, this answer is far from contribution of the owner, the kohen prohibitions against bringing satisfying. After all, why would the and the altar, is reserved for Jews only. blemished animals for wholly-burnt Torah connect what would seem to be As the Jews told the Samaritans, “It is offerings (korban olah) and for peace- completely different issues: the ban on not for you and for us” – we must keep offerings (korban shelamim) into two bringing blemished animals, and the our special spiritual character. different passages (22:18-20, 21-22). conditions under which a non-Jew can What is the message conveyed to us sacrifice? The question only deepens if As with many other teachings of the through this seemingly redundant we note that an explicit prohibition Torah, it is easy to fall into one repetition? against taking blemished sacrifices from sweeping position: either to completely non-Jews appears a few verses later. reject the ability of non-Jews to serve One answer is suggested by the (22:25) our G-d, ignoring both their being Seforno. (ad loc.) If the prohibition created in G-d’s image and the reality of would have been written only once, we To answer these questions, we shall G-d as the creator of all, or to may have thought that the burnt consider a different one: why, according completely equate their relationship to offering was excepted, for it is given to Rabbi Akiva, can non-Jews bring G-d with ours, failing to recognize the voluntarily, and therefore its laws are burnt offerings but not peace offerings? special status of the Jewish People as less strict. Alternatively, maybe peace- We encounter a similarly puzzling “G-d’s firstborn son”. Our parshah offerings would be the exception, due distinction when we contrast Shlomo’s challenges us to hold to a much more to their lower state of holiness. prayer at the inauguration of the first complex view – sanctifying the korban of Therefore, the Torah specifies that Beit HaMikdash, asking G-d to heed the others, and yet holding fast to the role both must be unblemished. request of the non-Jew coming from a of a “priestly kingdom and a holy far land (Melachim I 8:41-43), and the nation”. Our Sages’ understanding of this Jews’ openly hostile rejection of the parshah may hint at a different lesson. Samaritans’ offer to assist them in [email protected] They made an interesting observation: building the second Beit HaMikdash, “It in the verse speaking about burnt is not for you and for us to build a offerings, the Torah uses a double House for our G-d, but we ourselves term – “A man, a man, from the house shall build.” (Ezra 4:2) of Israel or from the strangers among Israel who offers up his sacrifice…” Our tradition, it seems, is instructing us OUR BEIT MIDRASH ROSH BEIT MIDRASH ABBI ORDECHAI ORCZYNER R M T SGAN ROSH BEIT MIDRASH RABBI JONATHAN ZIRING AVREICHIM DAM RIEDMANN ARON EREZ A F , Y P CHAVERIM ISAAC BUSHEWSKY, URI FRISCHMAN, NADAV GASNER, SHIMMY JESIN, BJ KOROBKIN, YOSEPH LEVI, ZACK MINCER, RONI PEREZ, JOSH PHILLIP, JACOB POSLUNS, DAVID RIABOY, MORDECHAI ROTH, ARIEL SHIELDS, DAVID SUTTNER, DAVID ZARKHINE Find our upcoming shiurim on-line at WOMEN’S BEIT MIDRASH MRS. ORA ZIRING, MRS. ELLIEZRA PEREZ www.torontotorah.com CHAVEROT YAKIRA BEGUN, NOA BORDAN, MAYTAL CUPERFAIN, MIRA GOLDSTEIN, KAYLA HALBERSTADT, LEORA KARON, RIVKA SAVAGE, KAYLA SHIELDS, ARIELA We are grateful to SNOWBELL, SARAH WAPNER, MIRIAM WEISS Continental Press 905-660-0311 Book Review: With Perfect Faith Adam Friedmann With Perfect Faith: Foundations of of the physical world, the Torah, and explaining how they differ from, or Jewish Belief philosophy as a whole. Therefore, any agree with Rambam’s perspective. Rabbi J. David Bleich, Editor critical review of the thirteen principles Ktav Publishers (1983) needs to consider not only the basic The book is entirely in English, making text, deriving from Rambam’s the sources accessible to those who About the Editor Commentary to the Mishnah, but also cannot understand them in their Rabbi Dr. J. David Bleich serves as a Rambam’s other writings and the original languages, either Hebrew or Rosh Yeshiva at Yeshiva University’s writings of other medieval Jewish Judeo-Arabic. The only, slight, Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary. philosophical thinkers. The goal of this inconvenience in this regard is that the He is also the head of the latter’s Yadin volume is to provide the source translations used for the citations are Yadin Kollel for training rabbinical material for just that kind of analysis. not the most up to date, meaning the judges. In addition, he has taught English itself is somewhat stilted. philosophy, particularly ethics, at both Content, Structure, and Style the undergraduate and graduate levels The volume opens with a general Final Thoughts in Yeshiva University’s various schools, introduction from Rabbi Bleich about This volume is a valuable resource for and is a regular lecturer at its Cardozo the value of dogma in Judaism. The anyone who seeks to move beyond the School of Law. Rabbi Bleich has first section of the book takes up this basic understanding of the Thirteen published prolifically on both halachah theme, including the full text of the Principles towards a deeper grasp of and philosophy. Thirteen Principles, as well as the intellectual context in which selections from other thinkers who Rambam made his dogmatic claims. Concept of the Book range from agreeing in part with Rabbi Bleich’s introductions serve to Rambam’s Thirteen Principles of Faith Rambam’s list, to rejecting the tie the various sources together, have become a foundation for Jewish existence of “Jewish dogma” offering a potential explanation of philosophical discussion. However, altogether. Following this are thirteen Rambam’s ideas. These can serve as Rambam was not the only thinker to chapters, one for each principle, which the basis for one’s own thinking on the develop a systematic approach to the include selections from other great subject, which can be developed bases of our beliefs and he was not the medieval Jewish thinkers such as through a thoughtful reading of the first to discuss the range of Rabbis Yosef Albo, Sa’adia Gaon, book overall. philosophical topics which relate to Yehudah HaLevi, Abarbanel, and those thirteen principles. Furthermore, others. Each chapter is introduced by [email protected] Rambam’s words do not appear in Rabbi Bleich, who provides framing for vacuum; they reflect his understanding the passages that are quoted, Israel’s Chief Rabbis: Rabbi Benny Elon Yaron Perez Rabbi Binyamin (Benny) Elon Rabbi Elon and his wife, author Emunah Elon, established 5715 (1954) - 5777 (2017) Beit El Press, through which he personally published a Chief Rabbi, Kibbutz Shluchot (1978-1982) commentary to Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Kook’s Ma’amar haDor. He also established Tov Ro’i Press, which published Rabbi Binyamin Elon’s father was Rabbi Dr. Menachem Elon, Rabbi Kook’s commentary to the Talmud. Rabbi and a legal scholar and judge who served as Vice President of Rabbanit Elon have six children; his son Uri created a Israel’s Supreme Court. Rabbi Binyamin Elon was born in popular television series, Shtissel. Jerusalem and learned in Yeshivat Mercaz haRav; he was ordained in 1978, and he was appointed Chief Rabbi of In 2014, Rabbi Elon suffered a relapse of cancer, but he Kibbutz Shluchot in Northern Israel. Rabbi Elon taught in continued his public activities until his passing last Friday. Machon Meir, Ateret Kohanim and Birkat Moshe (Maaleh In 2016, he received the Moskowitz Prize for Zionism, and Adumim), among other yeshivot. In 1990, Rabbi Elon worked an interviewer asked him, “What is the most important with Rabbi Hanan Porat to establish Yeshivat Beit Orot on message you would like to convey today?” Rabbi Elon Mount Scopus; he served as the first Rosh Yeshiva, for six replied, “Nothing is more important than family continuity, years.
Recommended publications
  • An Israeli Proposal for Peace, Including Rehabilitation of Palestinian Refugees
    An Israeli proposal for peace, including rehabilitation of Palestinian refugees Proposed by Member of Knesset Benny Elon Tishrei 5768 • October 2007 www.Israelinitiative.com Dear fellow Israeli citizens, Since the establishment of the State of Israel, we have longed for peace with our Arab neighbors. We dream of a time when we will be able to devote our efforts and resources not to war and survival but to growth and prosperity for the benefit of all residents of the region. The Oslo dream has become a nightmare Despite our strong desire for peace and in spite of repeated attempts to find solutions, many of which have included painful concessions on our part, the Israeli-Arab conflict continues and exacts a high price from us. The actions of Israeli governments to establish a Palestinian State in the spirit of the Oslo Agreement have not brought about peace but rather a whirlpool of blood: Hamas controls Gaza; Kassam rockets are fired at the residents of Sderot; Hezbollah has missiles trained on Haifa, and only the persistent activities of the IDF are preventing terrorist attacks originating in Judea and Samaria. Neither have the Palestinians reaped any benefits from the Oslo Agreement. Poverty and suffering and a regime that employs terrorism against its own citizens are the net results of the Oslo approach. New thinking, new hope We were not mistaken in striving for peace, but only in the way we set out to achieve it. We must re-examine all the assumptions that guided us, understand where we were mistaken, and move forward in the right direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H337
    January 17, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H337 in America for his courage and dedica- ers. In the days and weeks ahead, my cared for in 59 camps run by the United tion to democracy. office will be working to provide what- Nations Relief and Works Agency, or I believe that if Turkey wants to fur- ever assistance is necessary to help the U-N-R-W-A, sometimes referred to ther explore the opportunities that she these workers get back to work. But as UNRWA. wishes to do within the present Euro- they want their jobs. Nearly 60 years after the first of pean Union, she must address the issue Mainers have rallied for each other these camps were established, virtually of article 301. I hope my colleagues will during difficult times in the past and nothing has been done to return this join me in honoring the memory of will do so again. I’ll continue to be in- population to a settled existence. The Hrant Dink and continue to urge the volved in meeting the needs of our 1.3 million Palestinians living in these repeal of article 301. workers affected by this announce- camps live in a world of poverty, their f ment, and I’ll stay in close contact day-to-day existence solely reliant on with plant officials and workers in the international handouts. b 1500 days ahead. The history of Palestinian refugee ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE But this Congress has to look at the problems clarifies why the Elon peace fundamental problem with our flawed plan is so needed at this time: The SPEAKER pro tempore.
    [Show full text]
  • O Occupied East Jerusalem
    Occupied East Jerusalem “De-Palestinization” and Forcible Transfer of Palestinians A situation of systematic breaches of State obligations under the ICCPR JOINT NGO REPORT to the UN Human Rights Committee For the Committee’s Review of the Fourth Periodic Report of ISRAEL Submitted by: The Civic Coalition for Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem (CCPRJ) Contact: Zakaria Odeh, executive director Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 2343929 www.civiccoalition-jerusalem.org The Coalition for Jerusalem (CFJ) Contact: Aminah Abdelhaq, coordinator Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 6562272 url: www.coalitionforjerusalem.org The Society of St. Yves, Catholic Center for Human Rights (St. Yves) Contact: Dalia Qumsieh, head of advocacy Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 6264662 url: www.saintyves.org 1 Content Introduction Paragraph RECOMMENDATIONS A. Constitutional and legal framework within which the Covenant is implemented by Israel in occupied East Jerusalem (Art. 1, 2) Question 4: Application of the Covenant in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) 4 – 11 Question 5: Equality and non-discrimination in Israeli law, courts; other measures 12 – 22 Recommended Questions to the State party (Art. 1 and 2) B. State of Emergency (Art. 4); derogations from international standards Questions 12, 19: Progress in review of Israel’s state of emergency; derogations 23 – 25 from international standards (complementary issues) Recommended Questions to State party (Article 4) C. Freedom of movement and residence (Art. 12, 2; also 14, 17, 23, 24, 26) Questions 20, 21: Complementary information on Palestinians in East Jerusalem 26 – 34 D. Protection of the Family, Protection of the Child (Art.23, 24, 2; 12, 14, 17, 24, 26) Question 25: Measures taken by the State party to revoke the Citizenship and 35 – 45 Entry Into Israel Law; right to marriage E.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Religious Right and the Question Of
    ISRAEL’S RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND THE QUESTION OF SETTLEMENTS Middle East Report N°89 – 20 July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. NATIONAL-RELIGIOUS FRAGMENTATION AND RADICALISATION............ 3 III. THE TIME OF THE ULTRA-ORTHODOX............................................................... 12 IV. JEWISH ACTIVIST TOOLS ........................................................................................ 17 A. RHETORIC OR REALITY? ............................................................................................................17 B. INSTITUTIONAL LEVERAGE ........................................................................................................17 1. Political representation...............................................................................................................17 2. The military................................................................................................................................20 3. Education ...................................................................................................................................24 C. A PARALLEL SYSTEM ................................................................................................................25 V. FROM CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO VIOLENCE ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fuchs V. Prime Minister.Pdf
    466 Israel Law Reports [2004] IsrLR 466 HCJ 5261/04 Advocate Yossi Fuchs v Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon HCJ 5262/04 Advocate Naftali Gur-Aryeh and another v Prime Minister of Israel and another HCJ 5263/04 Yitzhak Vazana and others v Prime Minister of Israel and another HCJ 5264/04 Advocate Ben-Zion Gispan v Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon and others HCJ 5317/04 Minister of Tourism, Binyamin Elon v Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon The Supreme Court sitting as the High Court of Justice [26 October 2004] Before President A. Barak, Vice-President E. Mazza and Justices M. Cheshin, J. Türkel, D. Beinisch, A. Procaccia, E.E. Levy Petition to the Supreme Court sitting as the High Court of Justice Facts: The prime minister wished to promote a political plan, known as the ‘disengagement plan.’ In order to ensure that a majority of the Cabinet would support HCJ 5261/04 Fuchs v. Prime Minister 467 the plan when it was brought to a vote, the prime minister removed two ministers from office two days before the vote was scheduled to be held. The petitioners attacked the constitutionality of the prime minister’s action on both technical grounds and substantive grounds. They argued, inter alia, that it was improper for the prime minister to remove two ministers from office because they opposed his plan, in order to create an artificial majority in the Cabinet in favour of the plan. Held: The Supreme Court held that the discretion of the prime minister when exercising his power to remove ministers from office was very broad, and that the removal of ministers from office in order to further a political plan that the prime minister regarded as essential for the welfare of the State of Israel fell within the zone of reasonableness for his action in removing the ministers from office.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H337
    January 17, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H337 in America for his courage and dedica- ers. In the days and weeks ahead, my cared for in 59 camps run by the United tion to democracy. office will be working to provide what- Nations Relief and Works Agency, or I believe that if Turkey wants to fur- ever assistance is necessary to help the U-N-R-W-A, sometimes referred to ther explore the opportunities that she these workers get back to work. But as UNRWA. wishes to do within the present Euro- they want their jobs. Nearly 60 years after the first of pean Union, she must address the issue Mainers have rallied for each other these camps were established, virtually of article 301. I hope my colleagues will during difficult times in the past and nothing has been done to return this join me in honoring the memory of will do so again. I’ll continue to be in- population to a settled existence. The Hrant Dink and continue to urge the volved in meeting the needs of our 1.3 million Palestinians living in these repeal of article 301. workers affected by this announce- camps live in a world of poverty, their f ment, and I’ll stay in close contact day-to-day existence solely reliant on with plant officials and workers in the international handouts. b 1500 days ahead. The history of Palestinian refugee ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE But this Congress has to look at the problems clarifies why the Elon peace fundamental problem with our flawed plan is so needed at this time: The SPEAKER pro tempore.
    [Show full text]
  • Stereotyping Women, Individualizing Harassment: the Dignitary Paradigm of Sexual Harassment Law Between the Limits of Law and the Limits of Feminism
    Stereotyping Women, Individualizing Harassment: The Dignitary Paradigm of Sexual Harassment Law Between the Limits of Law and the Limits of Feminism t Noya Rimalt INTRO DU CTION ................................................................................................ 392 I. THE ORIGIN AND SUBSTANCE OF THE DIGNITARY CHALLENGE TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ............ 395 1I. ISRAEL'S PREVENTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW-A NEW APPROACH TO AN OLD PROBLEM ........................................................ 401 A . G eneral B ackground ...................................................................... 401 B. Relevant Features and Underlying Rationales ............................... 404 C. The Dignitary Paradigm of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law-Normative Ambiguity and Gendered Implications ................................................................................. 4 10 III. SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASELAW-FACTS AND ANALYSIS ..................... 412 A . The Suprem e Court of Israel .......................................................... 414 1. Four Conceptual Frames of Reference in Ben-Asher and Ga lili ...................................................................................... 4 14 2. Subsequent Supreme Court Cases Further Establish and Develop the Four Frames of Reference ................................. 423 3. Recent Developments in Supreme Court Caselaw .................. 431 B. Sexual Harassment Caselaw in Lower Courts ............................... 437 IV. SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Israel-Palestinian Conflict: Not Everything Depends on Us Israelis; but Much Does
    March 2014 http://mosaicmagazine.com/supplemental/2014/03/solving-the-israel-palestinian-conflict/ Solving the Israel-Palestinian Conflict: Not everything depends on us Israelis; but much does. By Yoav Sorek Israelis and Palestinians wave flags as Israelis march celebrating Jerusalem Day outside Damascus Gate in Jerusalem's old city on Wednesday, May 8, 2013. Credit: Associated Press/Sebastian Scheiner. I’m grateful to the three distinguished thinkers who have responded to my analysis of Israel’s situation and to my suggestions for improving it. Rather than reacting to all of their individual comments, I’ll try to focus on a few core criticisms and arguments. I should begin by noting the obvious: it is very hard to write about the Arab-Israeli conflict without being drawn into the solutions sweepstakes. In one way or another, once you confront the issues, you’re expected to offer a solution to them or at least to embrace one out of the several already publicly available. I’m no exception: although my essay was written less to propose or endorse a solution than to urge a basic shift in a prevailing Israeli mindset—a mindset for which we Israelis have paid a harsh price—I couldn’t avoid pointing to a few practical instances of a way forward. Regrettably, these have turned into a focus of discussion for more than one of my respondents as well as for others who have commented about the essay on the Mosaic website and elsewhere. Hillel Halkin is right to place me in the camp of those advocating “a single, Jewish state west of the Jordan with a fairly accommodated Arab minority.” To him, however, this version of a “one-state” solution is as much a fantasy as the “two-state” solution that we both agree is a non-starter.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Palestinian Political Terms
    Dictionary of Palestinian Political Terms PASSIA Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, Jerusalem PASSIA, the Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, is an Arab, non-profit Palestinian institution with a financially and legally indepen- dent status. It is not affiliated with any government, political party or organization. PASSIA seeks to present the Question of Palestine in its national, Arab and interna- tional contexts through academic research, dialogue and publication. PASSIA endeavors that research undertaken under its auspices be specialized, scientific and objective and that its symposia and workshops, whether interna- tional or intra-Palestinian, be open, self-critical and conducted in a spirit of har- mony and cooperation. Copyright PASSIA 3rd updated and revised edition, December 2019 ISBN: 978-9950-305-52-6 PASSIA Publication 2019 Tel.: 02-6264426 | Fax: 02-6282819 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.passia.org PO Box 19545, Jerusalem Contents Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………………………. i Foreword …………………………………………………………………….….…………..……………. iii Dictionary A-Z ………………………………………………………………………….………………. 1 Main References Cited…………………………………………..……………………………… 199 Abbreviations ACRI Association for Civil Rights in PCBS Palestinian Central Bureau of Israel Statistics AD Anno Domini PFLP Popular Front for the Liberation AIPAC American Israel Public Affairs of Palestine Committee PFLP-GC Popular Front for the Liberation ALF Arab Liberation Front of Palestine – General ANM
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Human Rights in Israel
    The State of Human Rights in Israel July 2003 – June 2004 Written by: aama Yashuvi Translated by: Kim Weiss Thank you to Tal Dahan, Oded Feller, and Amiram Gil, for their help in the preparation of the report. Thank you also to the rest of the ACRI staff on their enlightening comments and important information . © All rights reserved for the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (2004) The offices of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel: Main office: P.O.B. 34510 Jerusalem 91000, Tel: 02-6521218 Fax: 02-6521219 Tel-Aviv: 75 Nahalat Binyamin St., Tel-Aviv 65154, Tel: 03-5608185 Fax: 03-5608165 Haifa: 9 Sderot Hanadiv, Haifa 34611, Tel: 04-8348876 Fax: 04-8348878 E-mail : [email protected] Internet site : www.acri.org.il 2 Contents Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------5 Economic Arrangements Bill -------------------------------------------- 6 Workers Rights --------------------------------------------------------------7 Personnel Agency Workers ---------------------------------------------------------7 Wage Discrimination-------------------------------------------------------------------9 The Status of the Labor Courts -----------------------------------------------------9 The Flawed Implementation of Laws Protecting Workers’ Rights--------10 The Right to Strike --------------------------------------------------------------------11 Human Rights in the Occupied Territories ---------------------------12 The Separation Barrier --------------------------------------------------------------13 Lethal
    [Show full text]
  • On Nationalism and Democracy • • a Marxist Examination
    1 ON NATIONALISM AND DEMOCRACY • • A MARXIST EXAMINATION Ofer CASSIF The London School of Economics and Political Science PhD UMI Number: U213414 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U213414 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F a^EoooomcSoenc^ 2 ABSTRACT ‘Historical development toward a universal community of civilization,’ said Rosa Luxemburg, ‘will, like all social development, take place in the midst of a contradiction... ’ Indeed, on its face it seems that the simultaneous consolidation and spreading (within a progressing global order) of nationalist particularism, on the one hand, and of the support for democracy, on the other, do constitute such a contradiction. But is this really the case? Are nationalism and democracy mutually exclusive, or are they reconcilable after all? In this project, to paraphrase Rousseau's words at the beginning of The Social Contract, it is my purpose to enquire whether it is possible to reconcile nationalism with democracy, taking nationalism as it is and democracy as it may be. The dissertation shows that both democracy (as we commonly understand it today) and nationalism are strongly embedded in modem conditions (primarily capitalism) and their inherent contradictions, namely, the development of the autonomous self, on the one hand, and the loss of community and prevalence of identity crisis, on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Abhandlungen
    ABHANDLUNGEN Can Judaism Serve as a Source of Human Rights? Asher Maoz* A. Judaism 677 B. Judaism and Human Rights 680 C. Judaism, Human Rights and Western Philosophy 687 D. Human Dignity 690 E. Contemporary Application of Jewish Values in the State of Israel 696 F. Contemporary Application of Jewish Values in Other Jurisdictions 702 G. Judaism: Religion and Morality 710 H. The Unique Character of Halakhic Texts 714 I. Epilogue 718 A. Judaism Judaism – Yahadut in Hebrew – is first and foremost a religion. The term Juda- ism – Judaismes in the Greek form – is first found in the Jewish-Hellenistic litera- ture of the first century as a synonym for “the religion of the Israelites”.1 The same sense is found in St Paul’s Epistles to the Galatians – “And profited in the Jews’ re- ligion”.2 This term does not appear in the Bible3 or in rabbinical literature and only occasionally is found in medieval literature. In classical sources the term used for the body of Jewish teachings is Torah, which means also the Law of Moses or the Pentateuch. The term Judaism became popular during the Age of Enlightenment.4 * Associate Professor, The Buchmann Faculty of Law, Tel-Aviv University; General Editor, Mish- pat, Hevra ve’Tarbut – An Annual on Law, Society and Culture. I wish to thank the Minerva Center for Human Rights for the research grant. This essay is the recipient of the Shlomo Zakham prize. 1 Maccabees II, 2:21; 8:1; 14:38. Professor Samuel S. C o h e n wrote: “The term Judaism (Ioudais- mos) appears to have been coined by Greek-speaking Jews to designate their way of religious belief and practice as distinct from Hellenism which was the religion of their neighbors”; The Universal Jew- ish Encyclopedia, 10 vols.
    [Show full text]