DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. An Overview of the Flora of the Sky Islands, Southeastern Arizona: Diversity, Affinities, and Insularity Steven P. McLaughlin 1 Abstract.-The "sky-island" region of southeastern Arizona is roughly coincident with the Apachian District of the Madrean Floristic Province. The region extends to the Pinaleno and Santa Teresa Mountains in the north and to the Baboquivari Mountains in the west. The total flora of this region includes approximately 2100 species of which 166 are exotics. The largest mountain ranges within the sky-island region of southeastern Arizona have local floras possessing about 1/3 to Y2 of the regional flora. For their size and elevational range, the Rincon and Huachuca Mountains are comparately rich in species while the Pinaleno Mountains are comparatively depauperate. Based on their distributions within the western United States, the native species of southeastern Arizona can be classified as Madrean (57%), Cordilleran (17%), Sonoran (15%), Californian (6%), and Intermountain (5%). The Madrean element is a heterogenous group of species found mostly south of the international border and reaching their northern limits in southern Arizona; included are species with Chihuahuan, Sierra Madrean, and Neotropical affinities as well as Apachian (sky-island) endemics. Over half of the Madrean species from southeastern Arizona extend to Durango, and about 1/5 reach southern Mexico. In comparison to true insular floras, those of the sky-island region display high species diversity, comparatively low degree of local and regional endemism, and low percentage of exotic species. INTRODUCTION southwestern New Mexico, northeastern Sonoran, and northwestern Chihuahua. This region is char­ Flora refers to the plant species present in a acterized by its many small, isolated mountain region, irrespective of their importance in the ranges (fig. 1), covered with oak woodland and, landscape. In other words, flora refers only to the on the higher ranges, pine-oak forest and conifer­ presence of species, not to their dominance or ous forest. These ranges are separated from one abundance. The study of flora is referred to as another other by plains and valleys covered with floristic plant geography. The purpose of this pa­ desert and desert grassland. per is to discuss the flora of the sky-island region, Included in the sky-island region are all the particularly that of southeastern Arizona, in terms mountain ranges in southeastern Arizona from of its diversity, affinities, and insularity. the Santa Teresa Mountains in the north to the Baboquivari Mountains in the west; the Animas Mountains of southwestern New Mexico are also STUDY AREA part of this region. The isolated mountain ranges of northern Mexico display clear physiographic The sky-island region refers to an area consist­ and floristic continuity with those of the south­ ing of portions of southeastern Arizona, western United States. Mountains of northern Mexico that are part of the sky-island system in­ clude the Sierra de San Luis, Sierra el Tigre, Sierra 10ffice of Arid Lands Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. de los Ajos, Sierra San Jose, Sierra Cananea, Sierra 60 111" 110' lOS" 34" ~----~--~--~~~--~.r----------------__ ~ ,.----+34" 33" AR.IZONA MEXJ:CO 32." 31" SONORA 30" . lCILOKE1'EllS o 60 I i! 'i I o 40 KILZS H1!lU«)S., lUO 29"~--------------------'-------------------~"-------~~------~--r---~~~----L---~~29" 112" 111' 110" 109" lOS" Figure 1.-Map of the sky-island region, southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. The boundaries for the mountain ranges correspond to the lower elevationailimits of the oak woodlands; shaded areas are coniferous forests (after Brown and Lowe, 1980). The approximate boundaries of the Apachian Floristic District are shown; the dashed line In Mexico indicates greater uncertainty in the exact placement of this boundary. 61 Azul, and Sierra de Pinitos (fig. 1). It is not clear, Table 1.-Plant-community diversity (0.1 ha plots) in the Santa however, exactly where the southern boundary of Catalina Mountains (from Whittaker and Niering, 1975). Community-type Elev. (m) No. of Species the sky-island region should be placed on floristic Corkbark fir forest 2720 15 grounds. I separate it at the point where wood­ Douglas fir-white fir forest 2640 16 land and forest vegetation form a continuous Douglas fir forest 2650 10 cover in the northern Sierra Madre Occidental Ponderosa pine-white pine forest 2740 13 (fig. 1). Ponderosa pine forest 2470 8 The sky-island region has a semi-arid climate Ponderosa pine-silverleaf oak forest 2180 12 with biseasonal precipitation. Percent summer Pine-oak woodland 2040 18 rainfall increases from northwest to southeast Pygmy conifer-oak scrub 2040 20 across the region. Total annual precipitation gen­ Open oak woodland 1310 58 erally decreases from west to east in southeastern Desert grassland 1220 46 Arizona (McLaughlin, 1992b, 1993). Spinose-suffrutescent desert 1021 41 Upper Bajada desert 870 33 Lower Bajada desert 760 6 DIVERSITY southwestern mountain ranges have been inter­ Diversity refers to the number of species in a preted as an example of high diversity at particular area. Diversity can be analyzed on sev­ intermediate productivity. It is more likely that eral scales (Whittaker, 1977): (1) alpha diversity, gradients of decreasing diversity with increasing the number of species in a plot or community, aridity (downslope) and decreasing area generally 10-100 species; (2) gamma diversity, the (upslope) interact to produce high diversities at number of species in a landscape, usually 100- midslope. 1000 species; and (3) epsilon diversity, the number Plant ecologists often measure alpha diversity of species in a region, generally more than 1000 in 0..1 ha plots. Temperate North American sites species. I apply Whittaker's (1977) concept of ep­ typically average 20-30 species/0.1 ha (Whittaker, silon diversity to that of areas the size of floristic 1977; Gentry, 1988). Oak woodlands and grass­ districts and larger, and gamma diversity to that lands in the sky-island region display of local floras. In the case of the sky-island region, comparatively high alpha diversity (40-60 spe­ epsilon diversity refers to the diversity of the en­ cies/0.1 ha plot) while forest communities have tire region, while gamma diversity refers to the comparatively low alpha diversity (10-20 spe­ diversity of the individual mountain ranges (or cies/0.1 ha). Plant communities from neotropical other comparable areas) making up the sky-island sites typically have alpha diversities of 100-250 region. In addition to these inventory diversities, species/D.l ha plot (Gentry, 1988). beta diversity and delta diversity refer to change in species composition between plots or commu­ nities within a landscape, and between landscapes DiverSity (Gamma) of Local Floras within a region, respectively (Whittaker, 1977). Patterns of gamma diversity can be investi­ gated by examining the numbers of species in Diversity (Alpha) of Plant Communities local floras. Many biogeographers have noted that the number of species increases in a regular man­ Whittaker and Niering (1975) examined spe­ ner as a function of the amount of area sampled. A cies diversity over the elevational gradient of the log-log plot of the number of species vs. area is Santa Catalina Mountains. They found that the generally a straight line. Bowers and McLaughlin highest diversities were not in the most mesic, (1982) compared species diversity in 20 local flo­ highest-productivity forests, but in the open com­ ras from throughout Arizona. They found that munities at mid elevations-in woodlands, elevation range, rather than area, provided the grasslands, and the spinose-suffrutescent desert best predictor of species diversity. Species diver­ (Table 1). Lowest alpha diversity was found in sity increases with increasing habitat diversity, ponderosa pine forest and in the lower bajada which, in mountainous areas, is more closely re­ (creosote bush) desert. Wentworth (1982), work­ lated to elevation range than to areal extent" ing in the Mule Mountains, also recorded A number of local floras have been compiled maximum species diversity in oak woodlands and (or are in progress) for different sites in southeast­ grasslands. The patterns of species diversity on ern Arizona (Table 2), including four of the larger 62 ranges-the Pinaleno Mountains, Huachuca Mountains, Rincon Mountains, and Sierra el Tigre. 1200 Number of species in this discussion refers to the 1100 number of native species only-naturalized exotic 1000 ST species are excluded. Patterns in gamma diversity - • RM en I&J 900 within the sky islands region are shown in fig. 2, (3 I&J BOO which displays species number vs. elevation en0.. .... range for the 13 local floras listed in Table 2. There 0 700 ac: I&J is a stronger relationship between species number CD 600 ::I and elevational range (r = 0.653, P = .016) than :) z 500 between log species and log area (r = 0.514, p. = 400 .072), as previously observed by Bowers and MM- 300 McLaughlin (1982). - cw Of the four large ranges, the Rincon Moun­ 200 tains (Bowers and McLaughlin, 1987) and Sierra el 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 Tigre (White, 1948) have the largest floras. The ELEVATION RANGE (m) compilation of the Huachuca Mountains flora is still in progress (Bowers and McLaughlin, this symposium). The Huachucas have a lower total Figure 2.-Relatlonshlp between number of native species and elevation range for 13 local floras from the sky-Island region. elevation range than the Rincons and their flora is Abbreviations are: AC, Aravaipa Canyon; AM, Animas correspondingly smaller. The Pinaleno Mountains Mountains; BA, Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge; CH, (McLaughlin, 1993) have the greatest elevation Chiricahua National Monument; CW, Chiricahua Wilderness; FB, Fort Bowie National Historic Site; HM, Huachuca Mountains; range, yet their flora is smaller than those of the MM, Mule Mountains; PM, Pinaleno Mountains; RM, Rincon three other large ranges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Depositional Environment and Petrographic Analysis of the Lower Cretaceous Morita Formation, Bisbee Group, Southeastern Arizona and Northern Sonora, Mexico
    The depositional environment and petrographic analysis of the Lower Cretaceous Morita Formation, Bisbee Group, southeastern Arizona and northern Sonora, Mexico Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Jamison, Kermit Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 12:34:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/557979 THE DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS MORITA FORMATION, BISBEE GROUP, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA AND NORTHERN SONORA, MEXICO by HERMIT JAMISON A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN GEOLOGY In the Graudate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 8 3 Call N o . BINDING INSTRUCTIONS INTERLIBRARY INSTRUCTIONS Dept. i *9 7 9 1 Author: J ttm ilO Il, K e 1983 548 Title: RUSH____________________ PERMABIND- PAMPHLET GIFT________________ _____ COLOR: M .S . POCKET FOR MAP COVERS Front Both Special Instructions - Bindery or Repair PFFFPFKirF 3 /2 2 /8 5 Other-----------------------------— . r- STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknow­ ledgement of source is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to the Classic Literature Collection
    Your Guide to the Classic Literature Collection. Electronic texts for use with Kurzweil 1000 and Kurzweil 3000. Revised March 27, 2017. Your Guide to the Classic Literature Collection – March 22, 2017. © Kurzweil Education, a Cambium Learning Company. All rights reserved. Kurzweil 1000 and Kurzweil 3000 are trademarks of Kurzweil Education, a Cambium Learning Technologies Company. All other trademarks used herein are the properties of their respective owners and are used for identification purposes only. Part Number: 125516. UPC: 634171255169. 11 12 13 14 15 BNG 14 13 12 11 10. Printed in the United States of America. 1 Introduction Introduction Kurzweil Education is pleased to release the Classic Literature Collection. The Classic Literature Collection is a portable library of approximately 1,800 electronic texts, selected from public domain material available from Web sites such as www.gutenberg.net. You can easily access the contents from any of Kurzweil Education products: Kurzweil 1000™, Kurzweil 3000™ for the Apple® Macintosh® and Kurzweil 3000 for Microsoft® Windows®. The collection is also available from the Universal Library for Web License users on K3000+firefly. Some examples of the contents are: • Literary classics by Jane Austen, Geoffrey Chaucer, Joseph Conrad, Charles Dickens, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Hermann Hesse, Henry James, William Shakespeare, George Bernard Shaw, Leo Tolstoy and Oscar Wilde. • Children’s classics by L. Frank Baum, Brothers Grimm, Rudyard Kipling, Jack London, and Mark Twain. • Classic texts from Aristotle and Plato. • Scientific works such as Einstein’s “Relativity: The Special and General Theory.” • Reference materials, including world factbooks, famous speeches, history resources, and United States law.
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-0717 , Rincon Mountains, AGS Field Trip, Nov. 1971 , AZ, Pima Co. ,MILS
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Cabezas Mountains Proposed LWC Is Affected Primarily by the Forces of Nature and Appears Natural to the Average Visitor
    DOS CABEZAS MOUNTAINS LANDS WITH WILDERNESS CHARACTERISTICS PUBLIC LANDS CONTIGUOUS TO THE BLM’S DOS CABEZAS MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS IN THE NORTHERN CHIRICAHUA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA A proposal report to the Bureau of Land Management, Safford Field Office, Arizona APRIL, 2016 Prepared by: Joseph M. Trudeau, Amber R. Fields, & Shannon Maitland Dos Cabezas Mountains Wilderness Contiguous Proposed LWC TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE: This Proposal was developed according to BLM Manual 6310 page 3 METHODS: The research approach to developing this citizens’ proposal page 5 Section 1: Overview of the Proposed Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Unit Introduction: Overview map showing unit location and boundaries page 8 • provides a brief description and labels for the units’ boundary Previous Wilderness Inventories: Map of former WSA’s or inventory unit’s page 9 • provides comparison between this and past wilderness inventories, and highlights new information Section 2: Documentation of Wilderness Characteristics The proposed LWC meets the minimum size criteria for roadless lands page 11 The proposed LWC is affected primarily by the forces of nature page 12 The proposed LWC provides outstanding opportunities for solitude and/or primitive and unconfined recreation page 16 A Sky Island Adventure: an essay and photographs by Steve Till page 20 MAP: Hiking Routes in the Dos Cabezas Mountains discussed in this report page 22 The proposed LWC has supplemental values that enhance the wilderness experience & deserve protection page 23 Conclusion: The proposed
    [Show full text]
  • 236 Pinaleño Mountains in the Twentieth Century Atalanta Hoyt
    Pinaleño Mountains in the Twentieth Century Atalanta Hoyt Throughout the twentieth century, a few major events dominated the history of the Forest Service. First, the founding of the National Forest Service in 1905 replaced the Bureau of Forestry and led to the creation of modern National Forests. The new service was created under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture with the purpose of securing a long term supply of timber for the American people.1 Second, the great depression of the 1930s, Franklin Roosevelt’s creation of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the expansion of the Forest Service changed the shape of National Forests.2 This time period featured a major transition from timber management to hands on putting resources into the forest. The Forest Service and CCC planted trees, carved trails, built roads, and conducted research; actively molding forests and applying the latest forestry techniques instead of letting the forest take its course.3 A third period of great change came in the 1970s during the environmental era.4 The emphasis changed from conceptualizing the forests as resources to be converted into marketable goods to seeing them as wilderness in need of preservation. While conservation has always been an important part of the Forest Service - advocated by both those who saw an intrinsic value in wilderness and by those who used the wilderness for recreational purposes - increased urbanization highlighted the uniqueness of forests. Efforts to catalog and protect the environments of forests became a main priority while ecologists and conservationists gained status.5 These three main shifts defined the Forest Service in the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii PREFACE xiii SYNOPSIS xvii GLOSSARY xix A WORD ABOUT SYNTAX IN THIS VOLUME xxiii ABBREVIATIONS xxv BIBLIOGRAPHIA BAUMIANA 1 BOOKS OF NON-FICTION AND FANTASY 3 The Book of the Hamburgs 3 Mother Goose in Prose 5 By the Candelabra’s Glare 13 Father Goose: His Book 19 The Songs of Father Goose 27 The Army Alphabet 31 The Navy Alphabet 33 A New Wonderland 35 The Art of Decorating Dry Goods Windows and Interiors 38 American Fairy Tales 45 Dot and Tot of Merryland 48 The Master Key 54 The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus 59 The Enchanted Island of Yew 67 The Magical Monarch of Mo 73 The Woggle-Bug Book 82 Queen Zixi of Ix 85 John Dough and the Cherub 90 Father Goose’s Year Book 96 Baum’s American Fairy Tales 98 L. Frank Baum’s Juvenile Speaker 101 The Daring Twins 103 The Sea Fairies 107 Phoebe Daring 113 Sky Island 116 Baum’s Own Book for Children 121 The Snuggle Tales and The Oz-Man Tales 124 Little Bun Rabbit 125 Once Upon a Time 128 The Yellow Hen 131 The Magic Cloak 134 Jack Pumpkinhead 137 The Gingerbread Man 139 x BIBLIOGRAPHIA PSEUDONYMIANA 141 PSEUDONYMOUS BOOKS OF FICTION AND FANTASY 143 SCHUYLER STAUNTON 147 The Fate of a Crown 147 Daughters of Destiny 154 LAURA BANCROFT 158 The Twinkle Tales Series 158 Mr. Woodchuck 158 Bandit Jim Crow 162 Prairie-Dog Town 165 Prince Mud-Turtle 169 Sugar-Loaf Mountain 173 Twinkle’s Enchantment 176 The Twinkle Tales – Continued 179 Policeman Bluejay 179 Babes in Birdland 181 Twinkle and Chubbins 185 SUZANNE METCALF 188 Annabel 188 EDITH VAN DYNE 193 The Aunt Jane’s Nieces Series 193 Binding and Dust Jacket Formats 193 Aunt Jane’s Nieces 200 Aunt Jane’s Nieces Abroad 209 Aunt Jane’s Nieces at Millville 217 Aunt Jane’s Nieces at Work 224 Aunt Jane’s Nieces in Society 230 Aunt Jane’s Nieces and Uncle John 236 Aunt Jane’s Nieces on Vacation 241 Aunt Jane’s Nieces on the Ranch 246 Aunt Jane’s Nieces Out West 250 Aunt Jane’s Nieces in the Red Cross 254 The Flying Girl Series 258 The Flying Girl 258 The Flying Girl and Her Chum 262 The Bluebird Books, a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan March 2011 Edited By ELI CURIEL JR. ID Core Team Leader Approved By /C/ Annette H. Chavez March 4, 2011 Annette H. Chavez, Sierra Vista District Ranger Date Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 – SETTING UP THE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 3 STEP 2- DESCRIBING THE SITUATION ....................................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2.1 – EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 7 TABLE 2.2 - EXISTING ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS ............................................................................................ 13 STEP 3- IDENTIFYING ISSUES ..................................................................................................................... 13 STEP 4- ASSESSING BENEFITS, PROBLEMS AND RISKS OF THE EXISTING ROAD SYSTEM ... 21 LANDS .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 SOIL, WATER, AIR, AND FORESTRY ............................................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.1 Whetstone Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands
    Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands David Gori, Gitanjali S. Bodner, Karla Sartor, Peter Warren and Steven Bassett September 2012 Animas Valley, New Mexico Photo: TNC Preferred Citation: Gori, D., G. S. Bodner, K. Sartor, P. Warren, and S. Bassett. 2012. Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands. Report prepared by The Nature Conservancy in New Mexico and Arizona. 85 p. i Executive Summary Sky Island grasslands of central and southern Arizona, southern New Mexico and northern Mexico form the “grassland seas” that surround small forested mountain ranges in the borderlands. Their unique biogeographical setting and the ecological gradients associated with “Sky Island mountains” add tremendous floral and faunal diversity to these grasslands and the region as a whole. Sky Island grasslands have undergone dramatic vegetation changes over the last 130 years including encroachment by shrubs, loss of perennial grass cover and spread of non-native species. Changes in grassland composition and structure have not occurred uniformly across the region and they are dynamic and ongoing. In 2009, The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) launched its Sky Island Grassland Initiative, a 10-year plan to protect and restore grasslands and embedded wetland and riparian habitats in the Sky Island region. The objective of this assessment is to identify a network of priority grassland landscapes where investment by the Foundation and others will yield the greatest returns in terms of restoring grassland health and recovering target wildlife species across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Aravaipa Canyon Ecosystem Management Plan
    BLM Aravaipa Ecosystem Management Plan Final Aravaipa and Environmental Assessment Ecosystem Management Plan and Environmental Assessment Arizona • Gila District • Safford Field Office Field • Safford •District Gila Arizona September 2015 i April 2015 Mission Statements Bureau of Land Management The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is responsible for managing the National System of Public Lands and its resources in a combination of ways, which best serves the needs of the American people. The BLM balances recreational, commercial, scientific and cultural interests and it strives for long-term protection of renewable and nonrenewable resources, including range, timber, minerals, recreation, watershed, fish and wildlife, wilderness and natural, scenic, scientific and cultural values. It is the mission of the BLM to sustain the health, diversity and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Arizona Game and Fish Department The mission of the Arizona Game and Fish Department is to conserve Arizona’s diverse wildlife resources and manage for safe, compatible outdoor recreation opportunities for current and future generations. The Nature Conservancy The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. Cover photo: Aravaipa Creek. Photo © Greg Gamble/TNC BLM/AZ/PL-08/006 ii United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Safford Field Office 711 South 14th Avenue, Suite A Safford, Arizona 8 5546~3335 www.blm.gov/azl September 15, 2015 In Reply Refer To: 8372 (0010) Dear Reader: The document accompanying this letter contains the Final Aravaipa Ecosystem Management Plan, Environmental Assessment, Finding ofNo Significant Impact, and Decision Record.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tectonic Evolution of the Madrean Archipelago and Its Impact on the Geoecology of the Sky Islands
    The Tectonic Evolution of the Madrean Archipelago and Its Impact on the Geoecology of the Sky Islands David Coblentz Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM Abstract—While the unique geographic location of the Sky Islands is well recognized as a primary factor for the elevated biodiversity of the region, its unique tectonic history is often overlooked. The mixing of tectonic environments is an important supplement to the mixing of flora and faunal regimes in contributing to the biodiversity of the Madrean Archipelago. The Sky Islands region is located near the actively deforming plate margin of the Western United States that has seen active and diverse tectonics spanning more than 300 million years, many aspects of which are preserved in the present-day geology. This tectonic history has played a fundamental role in the development and nature of the topography, bedrock geology, and soil distribution through the region that in turn are important factors for understanding the biodiversity. Consideration of the geologic and tectonic history of the Sky Islands also provides important insights into the “deep time” factors contributing to present-day biodiversity that fall outside the normal realm of human perception. in the North American Cordillera between the Sierra Madre Introduction Occidental and the Colorado Plateau – Southern Rocky The “Sky Island” region of the Madrean Archipelago (lo- Mountains (figure 1). This part of the Cordillera has been cre- cated between the northern Sierra Madre Occidental in Mexico ated by the interactions between the Pacific, North American, and the Colorado Plateau/Rocky Mountains in the Southwest- Farallon (now entirely subducted under North America) and ern United States) is an area of exceptional biodiversity and has Juan de Fuca plates and is rich in geology features, including become an important study area for geoecology, biology, and major plateaus (The Colorado Plateau), large elevated areas conservation management.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona – May/June 2017 Sjef Öllers
    Arizona – May/June 2017 Sjef Öllers Our first holiday in the USA was a relaxed trip with about equal time spent on mammalwatching, birding and hiking, but often all three could be combined. Mammal highlights included White-nosed Coati, Hooded Skunk, Striped Skunk, American Badger and unfortunately brief views of Black-footed Ferret. There were many birding highlights but I was particularly pleased with sightings of Montezuma Quail, Scaled Quail, Red-faced Warbler, Elegant Trogon, Greater Roadrunner, Elf Owl, Spotted Owl, Dusky Grouse and Californian Condor. American Badger Introduction Arizona seemed to offer a good introduction to both the avian and mammalian delights of North America. Our initial plan was to do a comprehensive two-week visit of southeast Arizona, but after some back and forth we decided to include a visit to the Grand Canyon, also because this allowed a visit to Seligman for Badger and Black-footed Ferret and Vermillion Cliffs for Californian Condor. Overall, the schedule worked out pretty well, even if the second part included a lot more driving, although most of the driving was through pleasant or even superb scenery. I was already a little skeptical of including Sedona before the trip, and while I don’t regret having visited the Sedona area, from a mammal and birding perspective it is a destination that could be excluded. Another night in Seligman and more hiking/birding around Flagstaff would probably have been more productive. 1 Timing and Weather By late May/early June the northbound migratory species have largely left southeast Arizona so you mainly get to see the resident birds and summer visitors.
    [Show full text]