STAT 544 Lecture 5 Convexity – a Very Short (Bayesian) Tour C Marina Meil˘A [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STAT 544 Lecture 5 Convexity – a Very Short (Bayesian) Tour C Marina Meil˘A Mmp@Stat.Washington.Edu STAT 544 Lecture 5 Convexity { a very short (Bayesian) tour c Marina Meil˘a [email protected] Convexity is a very elegant and suprisingly powerful mathematical concept, that allows us to \think geometrically" about very high dimensional spaces, such as function spaces. In optimization, convexity is THE MOST impor- tant criterion for separating between easy and hard problems. In statistics, convexity plays a less proeminent role, but it appears in key places, as will be seen shortly. Reading Boyd and Vandenberghe, Convex Analysis, available freely on the web (see Resources page). 1 Convex sets A set C in a vector space is convex iff for any x; x0 2 C the line segment [x; x0] = ftx + (1 − t)x0; t 2 [0; 1]g is contained in C. Basic definitions • line segment ftx1 + (1 − t)x2 with t 2 [0; 1]g P P k • affine combination i tixi with i ti = 1, for fixed x1:n 2 R P Can also be written as x1 + i=2:k ti(xi − x1) with any real t2:k P P Proof t1 = 1 − ( i=2:k tj). Hence i=1:k tixi = x1 − (1 − t1)x1 + P P i=2:k tixi = x1 + i=2:k ti(xi − x1) and now t2:k can be any real numbers. Hence, the affine hull of x1:k is a subspace of dimension k − 1, spanned by xi − x1; i = 2 : k, and shifted from the origin by the shift x1. Exercise: Show that the result is the same no matter which xi we chose in place of x1. In particular, the affine hull of two points is the line that passes through them, the affine hull of three points is the plane that contains them, etc. P P • convex combination i tixi with i ti = 1 and ti ≥ 0 1 P • conic combination i tixi with ti ≥ 0. Note that 0 is a conic combi- nation of any set of points. • cone C: if x 2 C then tx 2 C for all t > 0 • convex set, affine set, cone, convex cone • convex hull, affine hull, conic hull • relative interior, (relative) boundary, (relative) closure 1.1 Examples of Convex sets T 1. hyperplane a (x − x0) = 0 2. half-space aT x − b ≥ 0 3. ball, ellipsoid 4. polyhedron = (bounded) intersection of m half-spaces 5. simplex = convex hull of k + 1 affinely independent points (i.e x1 − xk+1; x2 − xk+1;::: are linearly independent) 6. all symmetric matrices are an affine set and a convex set (unbounded) 7. all positive definite matrices are a convex cone 8. all stochastic matrices are a convex set 9. all doubly stochastic matrices are a convex set (what are its extreme points?) Convex sets in probability d 1. the parameter space of all normal distributions over R is a convex set 2. the (parameter) space of all discrete distributions over some countable space X 3. all distributions with a fixed set of marginals 2 4. the conditional distributions of a discrete joint Let X; Y 2 ΩX ×ΩY with jΩX j = m; jΩY j = n be two discrete random variables, and let Θ be the set of all probability distributions over ΩX × ΩY . That is, we define Pθ(X = i; Y = j) = θij; then Θ = fθ = [θij]ij 2 m×n P [0; 1] ; ij θij = 1g. Imagine θ to be rearranged as a vector of dimension mn: T vec(θ) = [ θ11 θ12 : : : θ21 θ22 : : : θmn ] (1) We use the linear-fractional (or projective) function (BV page 41) Az + b f(z) = domf = fzjcT z + d > 0g (2) cT z + d which maps a convex set into a convex set. Let now z = vec(θ), b = 0; d = 0, 0 0 1 if j = j = j0; i = i 1 if j = j0 A 0 0 = c = (3) ij;i j 0 otherwise ij 0 otherwise T P In other words, c vec(θ) = i θij0 = Pθ[Y = j0], and row ij of A, P 0 0 0 0 multiplied by θ gives i0;j0 Aij;i j θi j = θi;j0 = Pθ[X = i; Y = j0]. Hence, f(θ) = Pθ[XjY = j0] for any θ 2 Θ with Pθ(Y = j0) > 0. This subset of Θ is also convex (but not closed), therefore we conclude that the set of all conditional probabilities given a fixed Y is a convex set. 5. all distributions over R with E[X] in a convex set (in particular E[X] fixed, E[X] ≥ a) Convex spaces of functions 1. polynomials of degree n; all polynomials 2. fg j g ≥ f0g with f0 fixed R p 3. fg j jgj < ag with p ≥ 1; a 2 (0; 1) (the Lp balls) 4. all convex functions on set X 3 2 Convex functions k A function f : C ⊆ R ! R is convex iff it satisfies Jensen's inequality f(tx + (1 − t)x0) ≤ tf(x) + (1 − t)f(x0) for all t 2 [0; 1]; x; x0 2 C: (4) k Equivalent definitions: assuming f : C ⊆ R ! R, f is convex iff n • the epigraph of f epi f = f(x; y) 2 R × R; y ≥ f(x)g is a convex set. • (assuming rf is defined on the interior of C) f(x0) ≥ f(x) + rf(x)T (x0 − x); for all x; x0 2 C: (5) • (assuming r2f is defined on the interior of C) r2f(x) 0 for all x 2 C; (6) where the notation A 0 means that A is a positive definite matrix. Examples of convex functions aT x k k • e for any a 2 R ,x 2 R . •− ln x, x 2 R. • x ln x, x 2 R. k • jjxjj for any norm jj jj, x 2 R . x1 x2 x T k • ln(e + e + ::: + e k ) with x = [x1 : : : xk] 2 R . Convex functions in statistics • Any marginal of a discrete distribution. Let X; Y 2 ΩX × ΩY with ΩX j = m; jΩY j = n be two discrete random variables, and let Θ be the set of all probability distributions over ΩX × ΩY . That is, we define Pθ(X = i; Y = j) = θij; then Θ = m×n P P fθ = [θij]ij 2 [0; 1] ; ij θij = 1g The marginal PX (i) = j θij is a linear function of the entries of θ, therefore it is convex. 4 • The normalization constant of an exponential family Z(θ) −θT x n P −θT x Proof e is convex in θ 2 R for any x; then Z(θ) = x e is convex as a sum of convex functions of θ. • log Z(θ) is convex Proof The proof is statistical. Remember that 2 V arθ(x) = r ln Z(θ) The convexity follows from the positive-definiteness of the variance. • The KL-divergence KL(pjjq) for any two distributions p; q on Ω (con- tinuous or discrete) is jointly convex in (p; q). • An f-divergence is a score function defined as follows Z dP Df (P jjQ) = f dQ (7) Ω dQ where P; Q are distributions over Ω and f is a convex function on p (0; 1). Exercise What functions do you obtain for f(t) = t ln t; ( t − 2 2 1 1) ; (t − 1) ; 2 jt − 1j? 3 The conjugate of a convex function The conjugate of the convex function f is defined as f ∗(y) = sup yT x − f(x) (8) x2dom f The domain of f ∗ is the set of y's for which the supremum above is finite. Note that f ∗ is always convex in y, as a supremum of linear functions in y. T Let g(x; y) = y x − f(x). If f is differentiable and convex, then supx g(x; y) can be calculated by taking the derivative w.r.t x. rxg(x; y) = y − rf(x) = 0 (9) y = rf(x) ) solution x∗ (10) If f is convex, then x∗ is a maximum. If the solution above is unique, then we say the pair (x∗; y) = (x∗; rf(x∗)) is a Legendre conjugate pair. If the solution is unique for every y, then we can write f ∗(y) + f(x∗) = yT x∗ = rf(x∗)T x∗ (11) 5 Because at x∗ is the supremum of g(x; y), it follows that for every x in the domain of f the r.h.s is no larger than the l.h.s, that is f ∗(y) + f(x) ≥ yT x for all x; y (12) This is called the Fenchel-Legendre inequality. Proposition If f is convex, and epi f is closed, then f ∗∗ = f. In this case, we call f; f ∗ a Legendre conjugate pair of functions. Exercise Calculate the conjugates of: ex, − ln x, Ax + b; x 2 Rd, 1 − x2; x 2 [0; 1], x1 x2 xm 1 2 ln(e + e + ::: + e ), x , jjxjj . Find the comains of the respective conjugate functions, and find examples of vectors y which are not in those domains. Remark: If f convex, and y 2 @f(x) for some x, then y 2 dom f ∗ and y; x are a conjugate pair. Analogy with the Fourier Transform The Fourier transform maps f ^ R −!T x 2 ^ 2 into f(!) = dom f e f(x)dx, with f 2 L $ f 2 L . The Legendre- f^ −yT x f(x) Fenchel transform (8) maps f into e (y) = infdom f e e dx, with f convex $ f^ convex. The next sections are for additional reading. 4 [Optional: Strictly convex and strongly convex functions] A function is strictly convex if Jensen's inequality is strict whenever t 2 (0; 1), i.e.
Recommended publications
  • Computational Geometry – Problem Session Convex Hull & Line Segment Intersection
    Computational Geometry { Problem Session Convex Hull & Line Segment Intersection LEHRSTUHL FUR¨ ALGORITHMIK · INSTITUT FUR¨ THEORETISCHE INFORMATIK · FAKULTAT¨ FUR¨ INFORMATIK Guido Bruckner¨ 04.05.2018 Guido Bruckner¨ · Computational Geometry { Problem Session Modus Operandi To register for the oral exam we expect you to present an original solution for at least one problem in the exercise session. • this is about working together • don't worry if your idea doesn't work! Guido Bruckner¨ · Computational Geometry { Problem Session Outline Convex Hull Line Segment Intersection Guido Bruckner¨ · Computational Geometry { Problem Session Definition of Convex Hull Def: A region S ⊆ R2 is called convex, when for two points p; q 2 S then line pq 2 S. The convex hull CH(S) of S is the smallest convex region containing S. Guido Bruckner¨ · Computational Geometry { Problem Session Definition of Convex Hull Def: A region S ⊆ R2 is called convex, when for two points p; q 2 S then line pq 2 S. The convex hull CH(S) of S is the smallest convex region containing S. Guido Bruckner¨ · Computational Geometry { Problem Session Definition of Convex Hull Def: A region S ⊆ R2 is called convex, when for two points p; q 2 S then line pq 2 S. The convex hull CH(S) of S is the smallest convex region containing S. In physics: Guido Bruckner¨ · Computational Geometry { Problem Session Definition of Convex Hull Def: A region S ⊆ R2 is called convex, when for two points p; q 2 S then line pq 2 S. The convex hull CH(S) of S is the smallest convex region containing S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharp Finiteness Principles for Lipschitz Selections: Long Version
    Sharp finiteness principles for Lipschitz selections: long version By Charles Fefferman Department of Mathematics, Princeton University, Fine Hall Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA e-mail: [email protected] and Pavel Shvartsman Department of Mathematics, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Let (M; ρ) be a metric space and let Y be a Banach space. Given a positive integer m, let F be a set-valued mapping from M into the family of all compact convex subsets of Y of dimension at most m. In this paper we prove a finiteness principle for the existence of a Lipschitz selection of F with the sharp value of the finiteness number. Contents 1. Introduction. 2 1.1. Main definitions and main results. 2 1.2. Main ideas of our approach. 3 2. Nagata condition and Whitney partitions on metric spaces. 6 arXiv:1708.00811v2 [math.FA] 21 Oct 2017 2.1. Metric trees and Nagata condition. 6 2.2. Whitney Partitions. 8 2.3. Patching Lemma. 12 3. Basic Convex Sets, Labels and Bases. 17 3.1. Main properties of Basic Convex Sets. 17 3.2. Statement of the Finiteness Theorem for bounded Nagata Dimension. 20 Math Subject Classification 46E35 Key Words and Phrases Set-valued mapping, Lipschitz selection, metric tree, Helly’s theorem, Nagata dimension, Whitney partition, Steiner-type point. This research was supported by Grant No 2014055 from the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF). The first author was also supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1265524 and AFOSR grant FA9550-12-1-0425.
    [Show full text]
  • The Continuity of Additive and Convex Functions, Which Are Upper Bounded
    THE CONTINUITY OF ADDITIVE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS, WHICH ARE UPPER BOUNDED ON NON-FLAT CONTINUA IN Rn TARAS BANAKH, ELIZA JABLO NSKA,´ WOJCIECH JABLO NSKI´ Abstract. We prove that for a continuum K ⊂ Rn the sum K+n of n copies of K has non-empty interior in Rn if and only if K is not flat in the sense that the affine hull of K coincides with Rn. Moreover, if K is locally connected and each non-empty open subset of K is not flat, then for any (analytic) non-meager subset A ⊂ K the sum A+n of n copies of A is not meager in Rn (and then the sum A+2n of 2n copies of the analytic set A has non-empty interior in Rn and the set (A − A)+n is a neighborhood of zero in Rn). This implies that a mid-convex function f : D → R, defined on an open convex subset D ⊂ Rn is continuous if it is upper bounded on some non-flat continuum in D or on a non-meager analytic subset of a locally connected nowhere flat subset of D. Let X be a linear topological space over the field of real numbers. A function f : X → R is called additive if f(x + y)= f(x)+ f(y) for all x, y ∈ X. R x+y f(x)+f(y) A function f : D → defined on a convex subset D ⊂ X is called mid-convex if f 2 ≤ 2 for all x, y ∈ D. Many classical results concerning additive or mid-convex functions state that the boundedness of such functions on “sufficiently large” sets implies their continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ekeland Variational Principle with Applications and Detours
    Lectures on The Ekeland Variational Principle with Applications and Detours By D. G. De Figueiredo Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay 1989 Author D. G. De Figueiredo Departmento de Mathematica Universidade de Brasilia 70.910 – Brasilia-DF BRAZIL c Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 1989 ISBN 3-540- 51179-2-Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. New York. Tokyo ISBN 0-387- 51179-2-Springer-Verlag, New York. Heidelberg. Berlin. Tokyo No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by print, microfilm or any other means with- out written permission from the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Bombay 400 005 Printed by INSDOC Regional Centre, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore 560012 and published by H. Goetze, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, West Germany PRINTED IN INDIA Preface Since its appearance in 1972 the variational principle of Ekeland has found many applications in different fields in Analysis. The best refer- ences for those are by Ekeland himself: his survey article [23] and his book with J.-P. Aubin [2]. Not all material presented here appears in those places. Some are scattered around and there lies my motivation in writing these notes. Since they are intended to students I included a lot of related material. Those are the detours. A chapter on Nemyt- skii mappings may sound strange. However I believe it is useful, since their properties so often used are seldom proved. We always say to the students: go and look in Krasnoselskii or Vainberg! I think some of the proofs presented here are more straightforward. There are two chapters on applications to PDE.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete Analytic Convex Geometry Introduction
    Discrete Analytic Convex Geometry Introduction Martin Henk Otto-von-Guericke-Universit¨atMagdeburg Winter term 2012/13 webpage CONTENTS i Contents Preface ii 0 Some basic and convex facts1 1 Support and separate5 2 Radon, Helly, Caratheodory and (a few) relatives9 Index 11 ii CONTENTS Preface The material presented here is stolen from different excellent sources: • First of all: A manuscript of Ulrich Betke on convexity which is partially based on lecture notes given by Peter McMullen. • The inspiring books by { Alexander Barvinok, "A course in Convexity" { G¨unter Ewald, "Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry" { Peter M. Gruber, "Convex and Discrete Geometry" { Peter M. Gruber and Cerrit G. Lekkerkerker, "Geometry of Num- bers" { Jiri Matousek, "Discrete Geometry" { Rolf Schneider, "Convex Geometry: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory" { G¨unter M. Ziegler, "Lectures on polytopes" • and some original papers !! and they are part of lecture notes on "Discrete and Convex Geometry" jointly written with Maria Hernandez Cifre but not finished yet. Some basic and convex facts 1 0 Some basic and convex facts n 0.1 Notation. R = x = (x1; : : : ; xn)| : xi 2 R denotes the n-dimensional Pn Euclidean space equipped with the Euclidean inner product hx; yi = i=1 xi yi, n p x; y 2 R , and the Euclidean norm jxj = hx; xi. 0.2 Definition [Linear, affine, positive and convex combination]. Let m 2 n N and let xi 2 R , λi 2 R, 1 ≤ i ≤ m. Pm i) i=1 λi xi is called a linear combination of x1;:::; xm. Pm Pm ii) If i=1 λi = 1 then i=1 λi xi is called an affine combination of x1; :::; xm.
    [Show full text]
  • On Modified L 1-Minimization Problems in Compressed Sensing Man Bahadur Basnet Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2013 On Modified l_1-Minimization Problems in Compressed Sensing Man Bahadur Basnet Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Applied Mathematics Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Basnet, Man Bahadur, "On Modified l_1-Minimization Problems in Compressed Sensing" (2013). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 13473. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13473 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. On modified `-one minimization problems in compressed sensing by Man Bahadur Basnet A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Mathematics (Applied Mathematics) Program of Study Committee: Fritz Keinert, Co-major Professor Namrata Vaswani, Co-major Professor Eric Weber Jennifer Davidson Alexander Roitershtein Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2013 Copyright © Man Bahadur Basnet, 2013. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my parents Jaya and Chandra and to my family (wife Sita, son Manas and daughter Manasi) without whose support, encouragement and love, I would not have been able to complete this work. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . vi LIST OF FIGURES . vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . viii ABSTRACT . x CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .
    [Show full text]
  • 15 BASIC PROPERTIES of CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨Urgenrichter-Gebert, and G¨Unterm
    15 BASIC PROPERTIES OF CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨urgenRichter-Gebert, and G¨unterM. Ziegler INTRODUCTION Convex polytopes are fundamental geometric objects that have been investigated since antiquity. The beauty of their theory is nowadays complemented by their im- portance for many other mathematical subjects, ranging from integration theory, algebraic topology, and algebraic geometry to linear and combinatorial optimiza- tion. In this chapter we try to give a short introduction, provide a sketch of \what polytopes look like" and \how they behave," with many explicit examples, and briefly state some main results (where further details are given in subsequent chap- ters of this Handbook). We concentrate on two main topics: • Combinatorial properties: faces (vertices, edges, . , facets) of polytopes and their relations, with special treatments of the classes of low-dimensional poly- topes and of polytopes \with few vertices;" • Geometric properties: volume and surface area, mixed volumes, and quer- massintegrals, including explicit formulas for the cases of the regular simplices, cubes, and cross-polytopes. We refer to Gr¨unbaum [Gr¨u67]for a comprehensive view of polytope theory, and to Ziegler [Zie95] respectively to Gruber [Gru07] and Schneider [Sch14] for detailed treatments of the combinatorial and of the convex geometric aspects of polytope theory. 15.1 COMBINATORIAL STRUCTURE GLOSSARY d V-polytope: The convex hull of a finite set X = fx1; : : : ; xng of points in R , n n X i X P = conv(X) := λix λ1; : : : ; λn ≥ 0; λi = 1 : i=1 i=1 H-polytope: The solution set of a finite system of linear inequalities, d T P = P (A; b) := x 2 R j ai x ≤ bi for 1 ≤ i ≤ m ; with the extra condition that the set of solutions is bounded, that is, such that m×d there is a constant N such that jjxjj ≤ N holds for all x 2 P .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Convex Optimization in Function Space 5.1 Foundations of Convex Analysis
    Chapter 5 Convex Optimization in Function Space 5.1 Foundations of Convex Analysis Let V be a vector space over lR and k ¢ k : V ! lR be a norm on V . We recall that (V; k ¢ k) is called a Banach space, if it is complete, i.e., if any Cauchy sequence fvkglN of elements vk 2 V; k 2 lN; converges to an element v 2 V (kvk ¡ vk ! 0 as k ! 1). Examples: Let ­ be a domain in lRd; d 2 lN. Then, the space C(­) of continuous functions on ­ is a Banach space with the norm kukC(­) := sup ju(x)j : x2­ The spaces Lp(­); 1 · p < 1; of (in the Lebesgue sense) p-integrable functions are Banach spaces with the norms Z ³ ´1=p p kukLp(­) := ju(x)j dx : ­ The space L1(­) of essentially bounded functions on ­ is a Banach space with the norm kukL1(­) := ess sup ju(x)j : x2­ The (topologically and algebraically) dual space V ¤ is the space of all bounded linear functionals ¹ : V ! lR. Given ¹ 2 V ¤, for ¹(v) we often write h¹; vi with h¢; ¢i denoting the dual product between V ¤ and V . We note that V ¤ is a Banach space equipped with the norm j h¹; vi j k¹k := sup : v2V nf0g kvk Examples: The dual of C(­) is the space M(­) of Radon measures ¹ with Z h¹; vi := v d¹ ; v 2 C(­) : ­ The dual of L1(­) is the space L1(­). The dual of Lp(­); 1 < p < 1; is the space Lq(­) with q being conjugate to p, i.e., 1=p + 1=q = 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Linear Inner Structure of Topological Vector Spaces
    mathematics Article Non-Linear Inner Structure of Topological Vector Spaces Francisco Javier García-Pacheco 1,*,† , Soledad Moreno-Pulido 1,† , Enrique Naranjo-Guerra 1,† and Alberto Sánchez-Alzola 2,† 1 Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, CA, Spain; [email protected] (S.M.-P.); [email protected] (E.N.-G.) 2 Department of Statistics and Operation Research, College of Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real (CA), Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Inner structure appeared in the literature of topological vector spaces as a tool to charac- terize the extremal structure of convex sets. For instance, in recent years, inner structure has been used to provide a solution to The Faceless Problem and to characterize the finest locally convex vector topology on a real vector space. This manuscript goes one step further by settling the bases for studying the inner structure of non-convex sets. In first place, we observe that the well behaviour of the extremal structure of convex sets with respect to the inner structure does not transport to non-convex sets in the following sense: it has been already proved that if a face of a convex set intersects the inner points, then the face is the whole convex set; however, in the non-convex setting, we find an example of a non-convex set with a proper extremal subset that intersects the inner points. On the opposite, we prove that if a extremal subset of a non-necessarily convex set intersects the affine internal points, then the extremal subset coincides with the whole set.
    [Show full text]
  • The Krein–Milman Theorem a Project in Functional Analysis
    The Krein{Milman Theorem A Project in Functional Analysis Samuel Pettersson November 29, 2016 2. Extreme points 3. The Krein{Milman theorem 4. An application Outline 1. An informal example 3. The Krein{Milman theorem 4. An application Outline 1. An informal example 2. Extreme points 4. An application Outline 1. An informal example 2. Extreme points 3. The Krein{Milman theorem Outline 1. An informal example 2. Extreme points 3. The Krein{Milman theorem 4. An application Outline 1. An informal example 2. Extreme points 3. The Krein{Milman theorem 4. An application Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". kxk1≤ 1 Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". kxk1≤ 1 Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". kxk1≤ 1 kxk2≤ 1 Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". kxk1≤ 1 kxk2≤ 1 Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". kxk1≤ 1 kxk2≤ 1 kxk1≤ 1 Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are the convex hulls of their \corners". kxk1≤ 1 kxk2≤ 1 kxk1≤ 1 x1; x2 ≥ 0 Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are not the convex hulls of their \corners". Convex sets and their \corners" Observation Some convex sets are not the convex hulls of their \corners".
    [Show full text]
  • Subspace Concentration of Geometric Measures
    Subspace Concentration of Geometric Measures vorgelegt von M.Sc. Hannes Pollehn geboren in Salzwedel von der Fakultät II - Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften – Dr. rer. nat. – genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. John Sullivan Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Martin Henk Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Monika Ludwig Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Deane Yang Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 07.02.2019 Berlin 2019 iii Zusammenfassung In dieser Arbeit untersuchen wir geometrische Maße in zwei verschiedenen Erweiterungen der Brunn-Minkowski-Theorie. Der erste Teil dieser Arbeit befasst sich mit Problemen in der Lp-Brunn- Minkowski-Theorie, die auf dem Konzept der p-Addition konvexer Körper ba- siert, die zunächst von Firey für p ≥ 1 eingeführt und später von Lutwak et al. für alle reellen p betrachtet wurde. Von besonderem Interesse ist das Zusammen- spiel des Volumens und anderer Funktionale mit der p-Addition. Bedeutsame ofene Probleme in diesem Setting sind die Gültigkeit von Verallgemeinerungen der berühmten Brunn-Minkowski-Ungleichung und der Minkowski-Ungleichung, insbesondere für 0 ≤ p < 1, da die Ungleichungen für kleinere p stärker werden. Die Verallgemeinerung der Minkowski-Ungleichung auf p = 0 wird als loga- rithmische Minkowski-Ungleichung bezeichnet, die wir hier für vereinzelte poly- topale Fälle beweisen werden. Das Studium des Kegelvolumenmaßes konvexer Körper ist ein weiteres zentrales Thema in der Lp-Brunn-Minkowski-Theorie, das eine starke Verbindung zur logarithmischen Minkowski-Ungleichung auf- weist. In diesem Zusammenhang stellen sich die grundlegenden Fragen nach einer Charakterisierung dieser Maße und wann ein konvexer Körper durch sein Kegelvolumenmaß eindeutig bestimmt ist. Letzteres ist für symmetrische konve- xe Körper unbekannt, während das erstere Problem in diesem Fall gelöst wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • Convexity in Oriented Matroids
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY, Series B 29, 231-243 (1980) Convexity in Oriented Matroids MICHEL LAS VERGNAS C.N.R.S., Universite’ Pierre et Marie Curie, U.E.R. 48, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France Communicated by the Editors Received June 11, 1974 We generalize to oriented matroids classical notions of Convexity Theory: faces of convex polytopes, convex hull, etc., and prove some basic properties. We relate the number of acyclic orientations of an orientable matroid to an evaluation of its Tutte polynomial. The structure of oriented matroids (oriented combinatorial geometries) [ 1 ] retains many properties of vector spaces over ordered fields. In the present paper we consider classical notions such as those of faces of convex polytopes, convex hull, etc., and show that usual definitions can be extended to finite oriented matroids in a natural way. We prove some basic properties: lattice structure with chain property of the set of faces of an acyclic oriented matroid, lower bounds for the numbers of vertices and facets and charac- terization of extremal cases, analogues of the Krein-Milman Theorem. In Section 3 we relate the number of acyclic orientations of an orientable matroid A4 to the evaluation t(M; 2,0) of its Tutte polynomial. The present paper is a sequel to [ 11. Its content constituted originally Sections 6, 7 and 8 of “MatroYdes orientables” (preprint, April 1974) [8]. Basic notions on oriented matroids are given in [ 11. For completeness we recall the main definitions [ 1, Theorems 2.1 and 2.21: All considered matroids are on finite sets.
    [Show full text]