Case4:09-cv-02306-CW(7 Document253 Filed01/29/10 Page1 of 7 ( oOA
1 CRAIG J. CANNIZZO (State Bar No. 70379) MARK E. REAGAN (State Bar No. 143438) 4 2 GREG B SHERMAN (State Bar No. 253832) •4(//4 (Z5S HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, INC. 3 575 Market Street, Suite 2300 7 F! so San Francisco, California 94105 -t ‘ ‘r, ‘c 4 Telephone: (415) 875-8500 c. cYc Facsimile: (415) 875-8519 5 E-Mail: gshermanhea1th-Iaw.com Efiiing 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 0, ‘4, 11 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC CASE NO. 0, 12 AUTHORITIES, et al., 03441 a )V)Qx 13 Plaintiff, NOTICE OF RELATED CASE ) -< PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 TO BE w<. .1 14 vs. FILED IN CASE NO. c. 09-02306 (CW); -I-- -o ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 15 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, 5 Governor CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD JU’,, of the State of California; JOHN A. BE RELATED PURSUANT TO 5 Ui California Department of Health Care 18 Services; JOHN CHIANG, California State The Honorable Claudia Wilken Controller, 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a related case Calfornia Association of Public Authorities 24 et at v. Schwarzenegger et al, was filed on January 25, 2010, in the United State District Court for 25 the Northern District of California. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-12(b) and 7-11 of the United 26 State District Court for the Northern District of California, the California Association of Public 27 Authorities et al. (“CAPA”) submits this Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases 28 Should Be Related. 2O226 hi 2 Li Li NOTICE OF RELATED CASE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 Li Z WJ 2022631.1 U) .—‘ 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 apparently action. service ITTIn questions funding Americans the determination relates wrongful the Claudia should II. Wagner, Administrative was 11)” cases there concern I. State apparently addition pending will are Case4:09-cv-02306-CW Document253 Filed01/29/10 Page2 of 7 to pursuant A be The The Related to Whenever Under APPLICABLE Wilken. of Case substantially In-Home of act Chambers conducted related related the be with California’s California law Calfornia and to in an IHSS of No. related Civil complying Motion Disabilities the to and Cases unduly substantially occurrences, to case Civil a CV Supportive Northern program Martinez NOTICE copy party fact Local before C cases the under Association Association 09-04668. to failure burdensome L.R. STANDARD exist of same knows Consider Rule with . different involve Act, the OF Civil for District, 5-6, v. the one namely Services to parties, RELATED motion 3-12(a), Schwarzenegger, Civil purely and or same comply must Both or L.R. of of believes Whether substantially judges.” duplication the more. Public Public L.R. said the UNDER property, be questions (“IHSS”) buigetary of 5-1(b).” must an Rehabilitation CASE with passage the party served 7-11, of “action that Authorities Authorities Cases be the apparently Civil the PURSUANT 2 Hmust lodged CIVIL of a transaction an Civil the funding. apparently of on Case reasons. and copy federal labor is Should L.R. action fact all same related L.R. promptly implementation No. Act with known of L.R. et et and and 3-12(a). related law may defendants the al. al. As Be TO C. 3-12(b). — As or related to law. the expense 3-12 when v. v. C — motion, a Related, 09-02306 CIVIL event; such, parties be another result, including Schwarzenegger file Schwarzenegger cases assigned Specifically, related it cases: in L.R. the or dramatically and and are to together the the of pursuant when: conflicting CW 3-12 each following Assembly to Judge (2) before the concern earliest-filed cases an and/or It Medicaid (1) apparently action each with appears in require to the et et The the reduced each Civil similar results al. al. Bill VL. proof case Honorable which actions same action, action case likely Act, X4 L.R. v. related involves of if 1 the an is the 7- as that and or it L :i: i< -‘ DW 8 2022631.1 °.. < 2 o 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 12 13 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 /7/ /7/ III I/I III /1/ L.R. and expense 3-12(b)(2). Case4:09-cv-02306-CW Document253 Filed01/29/10 Page3 of 7 Accordingly, • • • • or homes disabled under and Whether institutions; under otherwise the and Whether in least enough § Medicaid Whether services, efficiency, Whether . 1396a(a)(30)(A); the possibility class class NOTICE to it Section C the geographic or appear the IHSS individuals . the decreased members other the members the in ADA, remain program’s economy, extent . violation and decreased decreased State OF . providers 504 of likely residential 42 RELATED confLicting in area, that of failed to to U.S.C. funding who their mandated the that of be quality be such funding in funding so the free Rehabilitation free to could homes there violation institutions. CASE that § give care federal for results 12132, from of from quality care will otherwise to IHSS for care, the and to PURSUANT IHSS discrimination discrimination enter Medicaid IHSS of be and required if by services and services the the . of an forcing Act, services services nursing services care, access remain unduly federal cases TO 29 consideration Act, are will and . C disabled U.S.C. CIVIL proceed to will homes under available Medicaid in burdensome . on on would 42 violate will services their the the violate U. L.R.3-12 Medi-Cal § not or individuals before S.C. basis basis be 794(a), homes the to other to Act, be prior inconsistent the the § the rights of duplication of sufficient 1396a(a)(30)(A); different 42 to rights residential by general their their to factors are enter U.s.c. forcing reducing who of available disability disability of Plaintiffs with judges. nursing to of population could Plaintiffs of enlist labor IHSS at DNz LL” ZF-in 4 uJ< DW flwjU. D 2022631.1 Do g2 U) Lfl I- Ui - 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 3 4 2 1 DATED: Schwarzenegger CW III. and/or Case4:09-cv-02306-CW Document253 Filed01/29/10 Page4 of 7 As CONCLUSION January set VL. forth v. et Wagner, NOTICE al. above C action 2010 the Case OF is Calfornia RELATED related No. CV to Association Attorneys By: HOOPER, CASE the 09-04668 Martinez PURSUANT 4 for actions. LTJNDY of v. Plaintiffs Public AIG Schwarzenegger, TO C & CIVIL Authorities BOOKMAN, J. CANNIZ L.R. 3-12 et Case al. INC. v. No. ‘— C. I 09-02306 ‘18 o -‘ DW o 2022631.1 g o L1 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Court foregoing prepaid. course day Bookman, following at BY NO. in CASES NOTICE employed Street, STATE the this that MAIL: Case4:09-cv-02306-CW Document253 Filed01/29/10 Page5 of 7 C. at addresses action of Executed I Suite On tthe At 09-02306 whose the declare SHOULD OF business is our OF in Inc.’s January correspondence true I 2300, the CALIFORNIA, as ordinary enclosed time RELATED direction listed follows: under practice and County on (CW); with San 25, of C BE January NOTICE correct in service, penalty business 2010, the Francisco, the RELATED the the of for ADMINISTRATIVE document(s) CASE United San is Service OF 25, and service collecting I COUNTY placed I SEE of served RELATED Francisco, was practices. 2010, that perjury California PURSUANT States ATTACHED was over PURSUANT List I PROOF for true at am and in made. and San under collection Postal 18 OF CASE employed copies State a I processing am years sealed placed 94105. Francisco, SAN OF the PURSUANT readily Service, of DianaMorgan ______MOTION TO of of TO SERVICE SERVICE California. laws FRANCISCO envelope and the the in CIVIL age correspondence CIVIL the familiar following mailing, envelope California. of in and - office the TO a TO L.R. C or sealed not LIST L.R. CIVIL United My package with CONSIDER it of a for 3-12 document(s) is business party envelope 7-11 a L.R. deposited collection Hooper, member States for TO addressed 3-12 on to mailing. I BE address the this of with WHETHER Lundy of described in FILED America and interested action. the the postage to mailing, On is bar & ordinary the 575 the IN that of persons I as parties am Market fully CASE same this the Case4:09-cv-02306-CWC Document253 Filed01/29/10C Page6 of 7 1 SERVICE LIST Putz, et al. v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al. 2 Anne Nelson Arkush Stephen P. Berzon 3 Altshuler Berzon Altshuler Berzon LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 177 Post Street, Suite 300 4 San Francisco, CA 94108 San Francisco, CA 94108 5 Gregory David Brown Timothy John Buchanan Office of the Attorney General McCormick Barstow, et al. 6 455 Golden Gate Avenue 5 River Park Place East Suite 11000 Fresno, CA 93720-1501 7 San Francisco, CA 94102 8 Susan M. Carson Scott Alan Kronland Office of the Attorney General Altshuler Berzon, LLP 9 455 Golden Gate Avenue 177 Post Street, Suite 300 Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94108 10 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 11 Stacey M. Leyton Karin S. Schwartz Altshuler Berzon, LLP Office of the Attorney General 12 177 Post Street, Suite 300 455 Golden Gate Avenue zc San Francisco, CA 94108 Suite 11000 13 San Francisco, CA 94102 14 David Abraham Silberman Peder J. Thoreen Lii J - L) San Mateo County Counsel’s Office Altshuler Berzon, LLP >-L- - 15 400 County Center 177 Post Street, Suite 300 zQ 6th D Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Zr 16 Redwood City, CA 94063 Lii I Li. lS 17 Emily Butler White Michael Gary Woods U) Altshuler Berzon, LLP McCormick Barstow, et al. -J Lii 18 177 Post Street, Suite 300 5 River Park Place East I— San Francisco, CA 94108 Fresno, CA 93720-1501 19 Michael A. Zwibelman Ann Esther Menasche 20 Office of the Attorney General Disability Rights California 455 Golden Gate Avenue 1111 Sixth Avenue, Suite 200 21 Suite 11000 San Diego, CA 92101 San Francisco, CA 94 102-7004 22 Anna Margaret Rich Charles Hobson Wolfinger, jr. 23 National Senior Citizens Law Center Attorney at Law 1330.Broadway, Suite 525 4655 Cass Street, #314 24 Oakland, CA 94612 San Diego, CA 92109-2811 25 Dara Lynn Schur Deborah Alyse Dorfman Disability Rights California 3580 Wilshire Blvd., #902 26 Bay Area Regional Office Los Angeles, CA 90010 1330 Broadway, Suite 500 27 Oakland, CA 94612 28 202263 1.1 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 Case4:09-cv-02306-CW Document253 Filed01/29/10 Page7 of 7 C C 1 Frederick Philip Nisen Jung Pham Disability Rights California Disability Rights California 2 Bay Area Regional Office Bay Area Regional Office 1330 Broadway, Suite 500 1330 Broadway, Suite 500 3 Oakland, CA 94612 Oakland, CA 94612 4 Marilyn Lee Holle Melinda Ruth Bird Disability Rights California Disability Rights California 5 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 902 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 902 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Los Angeles, CA 90010 6 Paula D. Peariman Shawna L Parks 7 Western Law Center for Disability Rights Western Law Center for Disability Rights Loyola Law School Loyola Law School 8 919 Albany Street 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015 Los Angeles, CA 90015 9 Sujatha Jagadeesh Branch Casey Austin Roberts 10 Disability Rights California Altshuler Berzon LLP 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 235N 177 Post Street, Suite 300 11 Sacramento, CA 95825 San Francisco, CA 94108 U, incp ci 12 Eve Hedy Cervantez z(’o,— Altshuler Berzon LLP 13 177 Post Street, Suite 300 o 0U, San Francisco, CA 94108 o : < 14 J(LIJ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 202263 1.1 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12