DOCSLIB.ORG

ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 27-0450-888 DISTRICT : Boonton Town School District SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 520 78.6 1.8 1011 80.4 82.2 84 85.8 87.6 89.4 White 299 84 1.4 1011 85.4 86.8 88.2 89.6 90 90 Black 45 60 3.3 1011 63.3 66.6 69.9 73.2 76.5 79.8 Hispanic 55 70.9 2.4 1011 73.3 75.7 78.1 80.5 82.9 85.3 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 119 76.5 2 1011 78.5 80.5 82.5 84.5 86.5 88.5 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 118 44.9 4.6 1011 49.5 54.1 58.7 63.3 67.9 72.5 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 136 69.1 2.6 1011 71.7 74.3 76.9 79.5 82.1 84.7 Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 522 81.4 1.6 1011 83 84.6 86.2 87.8 89.4 90 White 300 86 1.2 1011 87.2 88.4 89.6 90 90 90 Black 46 60.8 3.3 1011 64.1 67.4 70.7 74 77.3 80.6 Hispanic 55 76.4 2 1011 78.4 80.4 82.4 84.4 86.4 88.4 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 119 80.7 1.6 1011 82.3 83.9 85.5 87.1 88.7 90 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 118 60.2 3.3 1011 63.5 66.8 70.1 73.4 76.7 80 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 136 71.3 2.4 1011 73.7 76.1 78.5 80.9 83.3 85.7 Only Includes full year students (Time In School < Year students are removed) Title I Accountability System '-' Indicates too few students to determine (N<30) 11/5/2014 ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 27-0460-888 DISTRICT : Boonton Township Public School SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 348 85.1 1.3 1011 86.4 87.7 89 90 90 90 White 314 86 1.2 1011 87.2 88.4 89.6 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic - - - 1011 - - - - - - American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 52 65.3 2.9 1011 68.2 71.1 74 76.9 79.8 82.7 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged - - - 1011 - - - - - - Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 348 87.6 1 1011 88.6 89.6 90 90 90 90 White 314 88.2 1 1011 89.2 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic - - - 1011 - - - - - - American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 52 65.4 2.9 1011 68.3 71.2 74.1 77 79.9 82.8 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged - - - 1011 - - - - - - Only Includes full year students (Time In School < Year students are removed) Title I Accountability System '-' Indicates too few students to determine (N<30) 11/5/2014 ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 27-0630-888 DISTRICT : Butler Public Schools SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 532 74.1 2.2 1011 76.3 78.5 80.7 82.9 85.1 87.3 White 446 74.9 2.1 1011 77 79.1 81.2 83.3 85.4 87.5 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic 50 70 2.5 1011 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 113 41.6 4.9 1011 46.5 51.4 56.3 61.2 66.1 71 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 58 60.3 3.3 1011 63.6 66.9 70.2 73.5 76.8 80.1 Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 532 78.6 1.8 1011 80.4 82.2 84 85.8 87.6 89.4 White 446 79.6 1.7 1011 81.3 83 84.7 86.4 88.1 89.8 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic 50 72 2.3 1011 74.3 76.6 78.9 81.2 83.5 85.8 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 113 51.4 4.1 1011 55.5 59.6 63.7 67.8 71.9 76 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 58 67.3 2.7 1011 70 72.7 75.4 78.1 80.8 83.5 Only Includes full year students (Time In School < Year students are removed) Title I Accountability System '-' Indicates too few students to determine (N<30) 11/5/2014 ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 27-0785-888 DISTRICT : The School District of the Chathams SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 2033 90.5 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 White 1797 91 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic 54 77.8 1.9 1011 79.7 81.6 83.5 85.4 87.3 89.2 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 155 91.6 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 353 68.3 2.7 1011 71 73.7 76.4 79.1 81.8 84.5 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 33 72.7 2.3 1112 75 77.3 79.6 81.9 84.2 Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 2033 93.1 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 White 1796 93.2 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic 54 87.1 1.1 1011 88.2 89.3 90 90 90 90 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 156 95.5 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 353 73.6 2.2 1011 75.8 78 80.2 82.4 84.6 86.8 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 33 78.8 1.8 1112 80.6 82.4 84.2 86 87.8 Only Includes full year students (Time In School < Year students are removed) Title I Accountability System '-' Indicates too few students to determine (N<30) 11/5/2014 ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 27-0820-888 DISTRICT : CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL : DISTRICT LEVEL The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 943 84.9 1.3 1011 86.2 87.5 88.8 90 90 90 White 832 86.7 1.1 1011 87.8 88.9 90 90 90 90 Black - - - 1011 - - - - - - Hispanic 46 63 3.1 1011 66.1 69.2 72.3 75.4 78.5 81.6 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 52 77 1.9 1011 78.9 80.8 82.7 84.6 86.5 88.4 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 166 60.8 3.3 1011 64.1 67.4 70.7 74 77.3
Recommended publications
  • Page 1 of 283 State Cong Code LEA Code LEA Name Estimated FY2018

    Page 1 of 283 State Cong Code LEA Code LEA Name Estimated FY2018

    Table 2. Estimated FY2018 Grants to Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) Under Title IV-A at an Appropriations Level of $1.1 Billion Dollars in thousands Source: Table prepared by CRS, March 26, 2018, based on unpublished data provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED), Budget Service and congressional district information available from the U.S. Census Bureau. The appropriations level was provided by the requester. Notice: These are estimated grants only. These estimates are provided solely to assist in comparisons of the relative impact of alternative formulas and funding levels in the legislative process. They are not intended to predict specific amounts LEAs will receive. In addition to other limitations, data needed to calculate final grants may not yet be available. State Cong code LEA code LEA name Estimated FY2018 grant amount AL 102 100001 Fort Rucker School District $10 AL 102 100003 Maxwell AFB School District $10 AL 104 100005 Albertville City School District $153 AL 104 100006 Marshall County School District $192 AL 106, 107 100007 Hoover City School District $86 AL 105 100008 Madison City School District $57 AL 103, 106 100011 Leeds City School District $32 AL 104 100012 Boaz City School District $41 AL 103, 106, 107 100013 Trussville City School District $20 AL 103 100030 Alexander City City School District $83 AL 102 100060 Andalusia City School District $51 AL 103 100090 Anniston City School District $122 AL 104 100100 Arab City School District $26 AL 105 100120 Athens City School District $54 AL 104 100180 Attalla
  • Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools

    Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools

    Not As Good as You Think Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools By Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang Ph.D. 1 Not As Good as You Think Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools By Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang Ph.D. NOT AS GOOD AS YOU THINK Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned about Their Local Public Schools by Lance Izumi, J.D. with Alicia Chang, Ph.D. February 2016 ISBN: 978-1-934276-24-2 Pacific Research Institute 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: 415-989-0833 Fax: 415-989-2411 www.pacificresearch.org Download copies of this study at www.pacificresearch.org. Nothing contained in this report is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Pacific Research Institute or as an attempt to thwart or aid the passage of any legislation. ©2016 Pacific Research Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publi- cation may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or other- wise, without prior written consent of the publisher. Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary............................................................................................... 5 Introduction and Background on “Not As Good As You Think” Research ................ 8 Performance of New Jersey Students
  • Download, View and Print the Second Part of the Report As a Pdf File

    Download, View and Print the Second Part of the Report As a Pdf File

    Universe of Public Elementary and Secondary Education Agencies - Fall 2002 MONTANA / Page 203 Total 2001-02 Name of Agency Mailing Address Telephone Name of County Metro Grade Student Reg HS Spec Ed Teachers Sch's Street or P.O. Box City ZIP Number Status Span Membership Grads IEP Regular School Districts ABSAROKEE ELEM 327 S WOODARD AVE ABSAROKEE 59001 406-328-4583 STILLWATER 3 PK-08 237 † 39 17 2 ABSAROKEE H S 327 S WOODARD AVE ABSAROKEE 59001 406-328-4583 STILLWATER 3 09-12 121 33 8 11 1 ALBERTON K-12 SCHOOLS PO BOX 330 ALBERTON 59820 406-722-4413 MINERAL 3 PK-12 210 20 33 18 3 ALBION ELEM (NON-OP) HC 50 BOX 3 ALZADA 59311 406-828-4598 CARTER 3 N -N † † † † -2 ALDER ELEM PO BOX 110 ALDER 59710 406-842-5285 MADISON 3 PK-06 13 † † 2 1 ALZADA ELEM BOX 8 ALZADA 59311 406-828-4554 CARTER 3 PK-08 10 † 4 1 1 AMSTERDAM ELEM 6360 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN 59741 406-282-7216 GALLATIN 3 KG-06 75 † 14 6 1 ANACONDA ELEM PO BOX 1281 ANACONDA 59711 406-563-8277 DEER LODGE 3 PK-08 927 † 162 58 4 ANACONDA H S PO BOX 1281 ANACONDA 59711 406-563-8277 DEER LODGE 3 09-12 476 90 62 26 1 ANDERSON ELEM 10040 COTTONWOOD ROAD BOZEMAN 59718 406-587-1305 GALLATIN 3 PK-08 184 † 15 14 2 ARLEE ELEM PO BOX 37 ARLEE 59821 406-726-3216 LAKE 3 PK-08 324 † 46 28 2 ARLEE H S PO BOX 37 ARLEE 59821 406-726-3216 LAKE 3 09-12 147 21 14 12 1 ARROWHEAD ELEM PO BOX 37 PRAY 59065 406-333-4359 PARK 3 PK-08 121 † 17 11 2 ASHLAND ELEM BOX 17 ASHLAND 59003 406-784-2568 ROSEBUD 3 PK-08 53 † 19 7 2 AUCHARD CREEK ELEM 9605 HWY 287 WOLF CREEK 59648 406-562-3528 LEWIS AND CLARK 3 PK-08
  • School District of the Borough of Butler County of Morris, New Jersey

    School District of the Borough of Butler County of Morris, New Jersey

    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE BOROUGH OF BUTLER COUNTY OF MORRIS, NEW JERSEY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT of the Borough of Butler School District Board of Education Butler, New Jersey For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 Prepared by Borough of Butler School District Board of Education Finance Office THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE BOROUGH OF BUTLER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page Letter of Transmittal 1 - 5 Organizational Chart 6 Roster of Officials 7 Consultants and Advisors 8 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 9 - 12 Required Supplementary Information - Part I Management's Discussion and Analysis 13 - 21 Basic Financial Statements A. District-wide Financial Statements: A-1 Statement of Net Position 22 A-2 Statement of Activities 23 B. Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: B-1 Balance Sheet 24 B-2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 25 B-3 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 26 Proprietary Funds: B-4 Statement of Net Position 27 B-5 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position 28 B-6 Statement of Cash Flows 29 Fiduciary Funds: B-7 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 30 B-8 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 31 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 32 - 69 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE BUTLER BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) FINANCIAL SECTION (Continued) Page Required Supplementary Information - Part II C.
  • Market Study & Valuation Report Prepared

    Market Study & Valuation Report Prepared

    MARKET STUDY & VALUATION REPORT Expansion of Bloomingdale Quarry Bloomingdale Borough Passaic County, New Jersey PREPARED FOR Borough of Bloomingdale c/o Fred Semrau, Esq. Dorsey & Semrau, LLC 714 Main Street Boonton, NJ 07005 OTTEAU GROUP VALUATION | RESEARCH | CONSULTING | BROKERAGE New York Office New Jersey Office 140 Broadway, 46th Floor 15 Brunswick Woods Drive Manhattan, NY 10005 East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Tel: 800-458-7161 Fax: 800-273-3295 www.otteau.com February 11, 2016 Borough of Bloomingdale c/o Fred Semrau, Esq. Dorsey & Semrau, LLC 714 Main Street Boonton, NJ 07005 RE: Proposed Expansion of Bloomingdale Quarry Bloomingdale Borough Passaic County, New Jersey Dear Mr. Semrau: In accordance with your request, I submit our market study & valuation report regarding the above referenced property. The purpose of our study is to develop the following opinions with regard to the proposed expansion of the existing quarry boundaries to include a 180.1-acre parcel of land commonly known as the ‘Meer Tract’: To determine whether the proximity of residential homes to an active quarry operation results in any diminution of property value. To determine whether the proposed development of inclusionary multi-family housing on a 32-acre portion of the ‘Meer Tract’, to include both market-rate and affordable dwellings, is a viable use of the property that will fill a need in the local and regional submarket area. To provide a valuation for the Meer Tract, pursuant to the following scenarios: o The market value of the 32-acre portion which is approved for multi-family development based assuming that municipal approval of the quarry expansion has been granted and that site excavation and preparation work to facilitate residential development has been completed.
  • Appendix B DEFENDANTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS in the UNITED STATES

    Appendix B DEFENDANTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS in the UNITED STATES

    Case 1:20-cv-05878-CM Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 119 Appendix B DEFENDANTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN THE UNITED STATES (Abbreviations: S.D. = School District, I.S.D. = Independent School District, Unified School District = U.S.D., Consolidated School District = C.S.D., Elementary School District = E.S.D., School District = S.D.) Alabama Alabaster City Enterprise City Montgomery County Albertville City Escambia County Morgan County Alexander City Etowah County Mountain Brook City Andalusia City Eufaula City Muscle Shoals City Anniston City Fairfield City Oneonta City Arab City Fayette County Opelika City Attalla City Florence City Opp City Athens City Fort Payne City Oxford City Auburn City Fort Rucker Ozark City Autauga County Franklin County Pelham City Schools Baldwin County Gadsden City Pell City Barbour County Geneva City Perry County Bessemer City Geneva County Phenix City Bibb County Greene County Pickens County Birmingham City Guntersville City Piedmont City Blount County Hale County Pike County Boaz City Haleyville City Randolph County Brewton City Hartselle City Roanoke City Bullock County Henry County Russell County Butler County Homewood City Russellville City Calhoun County Hoover City Saint Clair County Chambers County Houston County Saraland Cherokee County Huntsville City Scottsboro City Chilton County Jackson County Selma City Choctaw County Jacksonville City Sheffield City Clarke County Jasper City Shelby County Clay County Jefferson County Sumter County Cleburne County Lamar County Sylacauga City Coffee County Lanett
  • Candidates for the 2016 Presidential Scholars Program

    Candidates for the 2016 Presidential Scholars Program

    Candidates for the Presidential Scholars Program January 2016 [*] An asterisk indicates a Candidate for Presidential Scholar in the Arts. [**] A double asterisk indicates a Candidate for Presidential Scholar in Career and Technical Education. Candidates are grouped by their legal place of residence; the state abbreviation listed, if different, may indicate where the candidate attends school. Alabama AL - Auburn - Anna Greene, Auburn High School AL - Auburn - Megan Lange, Auburn High School AL - Banks - Madelyn E. Montgomery, Evangel Family Christian Academy AL - Birmingham - Joseph Bannerman, Ramsay High School AL - Birmingham - Alana Bennett, P. D. Jackson-Olin High School AL - Birmingham - Natalie E. Conboy, Vestavia Hills High School AL - Birmingham - Alexander Debruge, Mountain Brook High School AL - Birmingham - Robert Denniston, The Altamont School AL - Birmingham - Cameron Giordano, Oak Mountain High school AL - Birmingham - Wyatt V. Harrison, Homewood High School AL - Birmingham - Adam S. He, Alabama School of Fine Arts AL - Birmingham - Katherine M. Hunter, Spain Park High School AL - Birmingham - Elizabeth Hurley, Chelsea High School AL - Birmingham - Hugh K. Perkins, The Altamont School AL - Birmingham - Mary E. Richardson, Homewood High School AL - Birmingham - Maya D. Samuels-Fair, Alabama School of Fine Arts AL - Columbiana - Landon C. Bentley, Shelby County High School AL - Cullman - Wilson R. Raney, Cullman High School AL - Daphne - Stephen T. Mcmanus, Bayside Academy AL - Decatur - Andie N. Wall, Austin High School AL - Fairhope - Adam P. Schrubbe, Fairhope High School AL - Florence - Chase Halcombe, Florence High School AL - Fort Deposit - Rachael Jackson, Fort Dale Academy AL - Gadsden - Harry H. Hager, Gadsden City High School AL - Gadsden - Justin C. Kelley, Gadsden City High School AL - Gardendale - Garrett A.
  • Appendix B DEFENDANTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS in the UNITED STATES

    Appendix B DEFENDANTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS in the UNITED STATES

    Appendix B DEFENDANTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN THE UNITED STATES (Abbreviations: S.D. = School District, I.S.D. = Independent School District, Unified School District = U.S.D., Consolidated School District = C.S.D., Elementary School District = E.S.D., School District = S.D.) Alabama Alabaster City Enterprise City Montgomery County Albertville City Escambia County Morgan County Alexander City Etowah County Mountain Brook City Andalusia City Eufaula City Muscle Shoals City Anniston City Fairfield City Oneonta City Arab City Fayette County Opelika City Attalla City Florence City Opp City Athens City Fort Payne City Oxford City Auburn City Fort Rucker Ozark City Autauga County Franklin County Pelham City Schools Baldwin County Gadsden City Pell City Barbour County Geneva City Perry County Bessemer City Geneva County Phenix City Bibb County Greene County Pickens County Birmingham City Guntersville City Piedmont City Blount County Hale County Pike County Boaz City Haleyville City Randolph County Brewton City Hartselle City Roanoke City Bullock County Henry County Russell County Butler County Homewood City Russellville City Calhoun County Hoover City Saint Clair County Chambers County Houston County Saraland Cherokee County Huntsville City Scottsboro City Chilton County Jackson County Selma City Choctaw County Jacksonville City Sheffield City Clarke County Jasper City Shelby County Clay County Jefferson County Sumter County Cleburne County Lamar County Sylacauga City Coffee County Lanett City Talladega City Colbert County Lauderdale County Talladega