International Council on Clean Transportation Comments on the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Council on Clean Transportation Comments on the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model International Council on Clean Transportation comments on the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Public submission to Environmental Protection Agency National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA-2018-0067; EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0283; FRL-9981-74-OAR October 25, 2018 Table of contents PUBLIC COMMENTS SUMMARY ................................................................................. 1 Technology effectiveness and availability ......................................................................... 1 Technology packages and pathways ................................................................................ 5 Technology cost and cost effectiveness ........................................................................... 7 Baseline modeling approach ............................................................................................. 9 Fleet rebound and safety ................................................................................................. 10 Consumer value .............................................................................................................. 12 Regulatory certainty and investments ............................................................................. 13 International competitiveness .......................................................................................... 13 Zero emission vehicles .................................................................................................... 14 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX: DETAILED COMMENTS .......................................................................... I-1 I. Technologies inputs and modeling methods ..................................................... I-1 A. Technology availability and effectiveness ................................................................ I-1 1. High compression ratio engines ............................................................................. I-2 2. Cylinder deactivation ............................................................................................ I-12 3. Turbocharging and cooled exhaust gas recirculation ........................................... I-14 4. Homogeneous charge compression ignition ........................................................ I-17 5. Miller cycle ............................................................................................................ I-19 6. Electric turbocharging ........................................................................................... I-21 7. Stop-start systems ................................................................................................ I-22 8. Mild hybrid systems .............................................................................................. I-23 9. Full hybrid systems ............................................................................................... I-25 10. Transmissions ....................................................................................................... I-26 11. Mass reduction technologies ................................................................................ I-28 12. Aerodynamics ....................................................................................................... I-33 13. Rolling Resistance ................................................................................................ I-35 14. Electric power steering, improved accessories, low-drag brakes ......................... I-37 15. Air conditioning ..................................................................................................... I-38 16. Off-cycle credit technologies................................................................................. I-40 B. Technology packages and pathways ..................................................................... I-44 1. Vehicle simulation modeling ................................................................................. I-44 2. Technology availability, applicability, and pathway constraints. ........................... I-53 3. Technology combination constraints .................................................................... I-60 4. Failure to consider cost-effectiveness when adding technologies ....................... I-62 5. Recommendation for agencies’ retrospective review ........................................... I-66 C. Technology cost and cost-effectiveness ................................................................ I-68 1. Individual technologies ......................................................................................... I-69 2. Technology package cost effectiveness ............................................................... I-84 D. Summary of data and methodological issues ........................................................ I-89 1. Removal of or rejection of pertinent data in rulemaking. ...................................... I-89 2. Changes since the Draft TAR, TSD, and Final Determination ............................. I-90 3. Summary of errors in rulemaking analysis ........................................................... I-92 II. Cost-benefit methodology .................................................................................. II-1 A. Baseline dynamics ................................................................................................... II-1 B. Fleet rebound, vehicle activity, and safety .............................................................. II-4 1. Vehicle fuel economy and safety background ....................................................... II-4 2. Two tricks being used to artificially create fatalities ............................................... II-7 3. Direct impacts of lightweighting on safety ........................................................... II-10 C. Consumer value of technology features ................................................................ II-11 1. Transmission gears. ............................................................................................ II-11 2. Variable valve and direct injection technologies .................................................. II-12 3. Turbocharging ...................................................................................................... II-13 4. Lightweighting ...................................................................................................... II-14 5. 48-volt mild hybrids .............................................................................................. II-15 D. Overall cost-benefit analysis .................................................................................. II-17 1. Program costs and benefits ................................................................................. II-17 2. Per-vehicle program costs and benefits .............................................................. II-18 3. Changes in per-vehicle costs and benefits from previous ................................... II-19 III. Regulatory certainty and jobs ........................................................................... III-1 IV. International competitiveness ........................................................................... IV-1 V. Zero-emission vehicles ....................................................................................... V-1 VI. Summary of attachments ................................................................................... VI-1 PUBLIC COMMENTS SUMMARY The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) provides these comments to The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, which proposes to revise the model year 2021–2026 light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards. This “public comments summary” discusses the major categories of deficiencies in the agencies’ analysis of technology inputs, modelling, and, ultimately, compliance cost projections. Our complete detailed discussion, with the supporting documentation and references for all content discussed in this summary, is available in the Appendix attached hereto. These comments demonstrate that the technology, cost, and benefit inputs and methodologies used by the agencies are deeply flawed and directly contrary to accepted scientific practices. The agencies have made unwarranted modifications to the previously-used and rigorously- supported technology inputs in the joint-agency (i.e., Environmental Protection Agency, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Air Resource Board) Draft Technical Assessment Report from 2016 and Environmental Protection Agency’s 2016 Proposed Determination and 2017 Final Determination, and the associated supporting documentation. The agencies have failed to include recent technology developments and also failed to provide reasonable explanations for their deviations from their previous assessments. The deviations made in analytical methods and the novel benefit-cost approach are error-filled and incompatible with real-world technology impacts from regulatory standards. Further, the novel regulatory analytical approach is out of line with any such vehicle regulation analysis, much less best practices, that we have seen in our two decades of work assessing vehicle technologies and policies in the
Recommended publications
  • Special Power Report Kia Kia Leads All Industry Brands in 2016 Initial Quality Study Soul and Sportage Receive Initial Quality Awards
    July 2016 J.D. POWER Special Power Report Kia Kia Leads All Industry Brands in 2016 Initial Quality Study Soul and Sportage Receive Initial Quality Awards ia ranks highest among all automotive industry nameplates in the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS). This significant milestone comes just one year after Kia ranked K In ranking highest second overall in the 2015 IQS. It also represents the first time in among all brands 27 years that a non-luxury brand has led the industry in the U.S. industry-wide, Initial Quality Study. In addition to its industry-leading performance Kia earns an this year, Kia produces two award-recognized models: the 2016 overall score of 83 Soul in the Compact MPV segment (second consecutive year) and problems per 100 the 2016 Sportage in the Small SUV segment. vehicles (PP100) in the 2016 U.S. IQS, which exceeds industry average by 22 PP100 and represents a 3-point improvement 2016 NAMEPLATE IQS RANKING from 86 PP100 in 2015. Problems per 100 Vehicles (PP100) • Lower Score = Higher Quality The 2016 U.S. IQS evaluates eight problem categories that Kia 83 Porsche 84 comprise initial quality: Hyundai 92 • Exterior Toyota 93 BMW 94 • Driving Experience Chevrolet 95 • Features/Controls/Displays (FCD) Buick 96 • Audio/Communication/Entertainment/Navigation (ACEN) Lexus 96 • Seats Lincoln 96 • Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Nissan 101 Ford 102 • Interior GMC 103 • Engine/Transmission Infiniti 103 Volkswagen 104 The IQS measures both defects/malfunctions and design- Industry Average 105 related problems—features that may be operating as intended but are poorly located or difficult to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Separate Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2019
    201Separate financial9 statements PPorscheorsche TaycanTaycan TurboTurbo S 3 Content Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results of operations, financial position and net assets 31 Porsche Automobil Holding SE (financial statements pursuant to the German Commercial Code) 37 Sustainable value enhancement in the Porsche SE Group 41 Overall statement on the economic situation of Porsche SE and the Porsche SE Group 43 Remuneration report 44 Opportunities and risks of future development 52 Publication of the declaration of compliance and corporate governance report 78 Subsequent events 79 Forecast report and outlook 80 Glossary 85 4 Financials 86 Balance sheet of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 90 Income statement of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 91 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 92 Independent auditor’s report 212 Responsibility statement 220 5 VVolkswagenolkswagen IID.3D.3 6 1 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 7 8 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results
    [Show full text]
  • A Trip Through Autoland Saxony How Felix Discovered That the Future of the Automobile Starts Right Here at His Very Doorstep
    AUTO! A Trip Through Autoland Saxony How Felix discovered that the future of the automobile starts right here at his very doorstep. Hey Oldster, ... FeFelix wwhhispers as a greeting. Then hhee cacasttss a critical ggllancece what’s up? inside tthhe DKW F1, built almost 90 years aaggo iinn Zwickauu,, Saxony. Evveery couple ofof wweeeks, Felix is draawwn from tthhe WWeesst Saxxoon UnUniveversity of AAppplied Sciencesces Zwickau to tthhe August Horch Museum – and hhee always lingers for tthhe lloongest time witthh “his” DKW oldtimer. Some of FeFelix’ fellow sttuudents ccllaim he’s having conversations wwiitthh tthehe vinttaage ccaar; so far, FeFelix hhaassnn’t deniieded iitt ... YESTERDAY IN “AUTOLAND SAXONY:” 1900 AUDI is born “Coswiga” – the first passenger car from Saxony, built in Coswig in . in Saxony – in 1910 founded by the auto pioneer August Horch (under the Latin version of ces in the 1932 his last name) in Zwickau. In , Horch, Audi, DKW, and Wanderer joined for Steering wheel on Chemnitz-based “Auto-Union.” It’s trademark – the four interlocked rings. – what most car drivers take for granted today began its the left, gearshift lever in the center 1921 mass-produced front-wheel- global success story in Saxony (Audi Factory) in . The 1931 Lightweight drive was launched for the first time ever in in the DKW F1 from Saxony. 1955 s- construction with thermosetting plastics – In , Germany’s first vehicle with a mas renaissance of produced plastic body was the Sachsenring P70 (later known as “Trabant”). The 1990 “Autoland Saxony” was launched by VW in – with the founding of the VW Sachsen .
    [Show full text]
  • BMW Price List
    Recommended Retail Price List – January 2021 Fuel Consumption Electrical Energy VES (band) Retail Price (l/100km) (kWh/100km) BMW 1 Series 116i Sport B 5.5 $146,888 116i Luxury B 5.5 $151,888 BMW 2 Series 216i Active Tourer Sport B 6.3 $157,888 216i Gran Tourer Sport B 6.5 $163,888 216i Gran Tourer Luxury B 6.5 $170,888 218i Gran Coupe Luxury B 5.5 $171,888 218i Gran Coupe M Sport B 5.5 $174,888 BMW 3 Series 318i Sedan Sport B 5.8 $208,888 320i Sedan Luxury - - P.O.A. 320i Sedan M Sport - - P.O.A. 330e Sedan Luxury A2 2.2 15.4 $261,888 BMW 4 Series 420i Coupe M Sport B 5.8 $228,888 430i Coupe M Sport Pro B 6.2 $276,888 BMW 5 Series 520i Sedan C1 5.5 $259,888 520i Sedan Luxury C1 5.5 $277,888 520i Sedan M Sport C1 5.5 $287,888 530i Sedan M Sport B 5.6 $299,888 530i Sedan M Sport Edition B 5.6 $308,888 530e Sedan B 1.9 15.3 $278,888 Booking Fees (Non-refundable and inclusive of $10,000 COE deposit): A1. BMW 1 Series / BMW 2 Series / BMW 3 Series / BMW X1/ BMW X2 / BMW i3 $20,000 A2. BMW 4 Series / BMW 5 Series / BMW 6 Series / BMW 7 Series / BMW 8 Series / BMW X3 / BMW X4 / BMW X5 / BMW X6 / BMW $28,000 X7 / BMW Z4 B1. Special Indent cars – BMW 1 Series / BMW 2 Series / BMW 3 Series / BMW 4 Series / BMW 5 Series $30,000 BMW X1 / BMW X2 / BMW X3 / BMW X4 / BMW i3 / BMW Z4 B2.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF, 19 Pages, 505.25 KB
    VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Shareholdings of Volkswagen AG and the Volkswagen Group in accordance with sections 285 and 313 of the HGB and presentation of the companies included in Volkswagen's consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 12 as of 31.12.2019 Exchange rate VW AG 's interest Equity Profit/loss (1€ =) in capital in % in thousands, in thousands, Name and domicile of company Currency Dec. 31, 2019 Direct Indirect Total local currency local currency Footnote Year I. PARENT COMPANY VOLKSWAGEN AG, Wolfsburg II. SUBSIDIARIES A. Consolidated companies 1. Germany ASB Autohaus Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,272 1,415 2018 AUDI AG, Ingolstadt EUR 99.64 - 99.64 13,701,699 - 1) 2019 Audi Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,971 - 1) 2018 Audi Electronics Venture GmbH, Gaimersheim EUR - 100.00 100.00 60,968 - 1) 2019 Audi Frankfurt GmbH, Frankfurt am Main EUR - 100.00 100.00 8,477 - 1) 2018 Audi Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg EUR - 100.00 100.00 13,425 - 1) 2018 Audi Hannover GmbH, Hanover EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,621 - 1) 2018 AUDI Immobilien GmbH & Co. KG, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 82,470 3,399 2019 AUDI Immobilien Verwaltung GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 114,355 1,553 2019 Audi Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,525 - 1) 2018 Audi München GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 270 - 1) 2018 Audi Real Estate GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,859 4,073 2019 Audi Sport GmbH, Neckarsulm EUR - 100.00 100.00 100 - 1) 2019 Audi Stuttgart GmbH, Stuttgart EUR - 100.00 100.00 6,677 - 1) 2018 Auto & Service PIA GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 19,895 - 1) 2018 Autonomous Intelligent Driving GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 250 - 1) 2018 Autostadt GmbH, Wolfsburg EUR 100.00 - 100.00 50 - 1) 2018 B.
    [Show full text]
  • BMW G11/G12 7-Series
    The All New BMW 7 Series bmw.com.au THE ALL NEW BMW 7 SERIES. SPECIFICATION GUIDE. MODELS. Transmission Cylinder / Power / Combined fuel Acceleration Capacity Torque consumption 0-100km/h cm3 l/100km Petrol Models 8-speed sports 6-cylinder 240 kW 740i 7.0 5.5 sec automatic 2,998 450 Nm 8-speed sports 6-cylinder 240 kW 740Li 7.0 5.6 sec automatic 2,998 450 Nm 8-speed sports 8- cylinder 330 kW 750i tbc tbc sec automatic 4,395 650 Nm 8-speed sports 8-cylinder 330 kW 750Li tbc tbc sec automatic 4,395 650 Nm Diesel Models 8-speed sports 6-cylinder 195 kW 730d 4.9 6.1 sec automatic 2,993 620 Nm BMW recommends the use of RON 95 super unleaded petrol. Unleaded 91 RON and higher with a maximum ethanol content of 10% (E10) may also be used. Output and fuel consumption figures apply to RON98 fuel. All engines meet the EU5 emissions standard. Fuel consumption is determined in accordance with the ECE driving cycle (93/116/EU), which consists of approximately one third urban traffic and two thirds extra-urban driving (based on the distance covered). CO2 emissions are measured in addition to fuel consumption. Optional equipment (e.g. wider tyres) can have a significant impact on fuel consumption. ■ Standard While BMW Group Australia has endeavoured to ensure that all information, representations, illustrations and specifications contained in these materials are accurate at the time of publication (22 October 2015), the information is general in nature only. Product features, specifications, models and prices are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lexus Range Experience Amazing
    THE LEXUS RANGE EXPERIENCE AMAZING Since the launch of the LS 400 sedan in 1989, Lexus has become a synonym for exceptional quality and incredibly refined luxury cars. Determined to offer more than this, recently we’ve launched a new generation of vehicles: cars that stand out from the crowd and defy convention. Models like the exciting new UX compact crossover and the provocative yet elegant ES executive sedan. Based on a uniquely Japanese aesthetic of harmony without compromise, Lexus design is now more distinctive and single-minded than ever. However, head turning looks would be nothing without incredible performance. Inspired by the iconic Lexus LFA supercar that was launched in 2010, our ‘Master Drivers’, have worked tirelessly to identify and articulate the unique flavour of driving excitement. With this hard won knowledge we’ve now enhanced the precise and elegant nature of every Lexus with a sizeable dose of adrenaline: creating an exhilarating new driving experience that starts when you approach a car like the LC luxury coupé, and continues as long as you drive and cherish it. Unsurprisingly, technology plays a huge role in our work. We see innovation as a never-ending process, and are committed to anticipating future needs and desires. This approach has led to major automotive breakthroughs like the world’s first Self-Charging Hybrid in 2004 – the RX 400h – and now Multi Stage Hybrid that powers the LS 500h and LC 500h. Despite our intense focus on the future, we’re immensely proud of the world-class build quality of our cars, which is overseen by our ‘Takumi’ artisans.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotion 3-2019
    auto motion IAV-Kundenmagazin | 03/2019 Next Level Automatisiertes Fahren bei IAV Bis zum selbstfahrenden automotion | Editorial 3 Fahrzeug sind es fünf Level. Wir erklären, was sie bedeuten. Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser, in Hamburg gilt seit einiger Zeit: The HEAT is on! Dahinter steckt die das System in einen Comfort Layer und einen Active Safety allerdings keine ungewöhnliche Hitzewelle in der Hansestadt – Layer aufteilt. Mehr dazu erfahren Sie in unserem Bericht auf stattdessen macht in der dortigen HafenCity ein autonomer, Seite 12. elektrisch angetriebener Shuttle von sich reden. Der Klimaschutz ist derzeit eines der beherrschenden Themen der SublineHEAT (Hamburg Electric Autonomous Transportation) wurde von politischen Debatte. Sicher ist: Auch der Mobilitätssektor muss IAV in Kooperation mit Partnern wie der Hamburger Hochbahn AG, einen Beitrag zur Verringerung der CO2-Emissionen leisten. Wie der Hamburger Behörde für Wirtschaft, Verkehr und Innovation genau das am besten zu erreichen ist, sollte aber offen und je nach (BWVI), der Siemens Mobility GmbH, dem IKEM – Institut für Anwendungsfall diskutiert werden. Neben batterieelektrischen Klimaschutz, Energie und Mobilität sowie dem Deutschen Zentrum Antrieben ist beispielsweise auch der Einsatz von Wasserstoff für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) entwickelt. Das Projekt will beweisen, und von synthetischen Kraftstoffen eine interessante Option. dass selbstständig fahrende Kleinbusse vollständig in den Über diese Fragen sprechen Dr. Joachim Damasky vom VDA und Straßenverkehr und den ÖPNV einer Metropole integriert werden IAV-Geschäftsführer Matthias Kratzsch im automotion-Interview können. Eine dreiwöchige Testphase im August verlief sehr erfolg- ab Seite 24. reich, und im Februar 2020 folgt bereits der nächste Schritt: Dann wird HEAT mit maximal 25 Kilometern pro Stunde autonom Weitere Themen in dieser Ausgabe: Schadensanalysen von me- durch die HafenCity fahren.
    [Show full text]
  • You Are Driving a Lexus LC 500
    You are driving a Lexus LC 500 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Major Dimensions & Vehicle Weights Length mm 4770 Overall (Kerb Mass) Width (w/o mirror) mm 1920 Height*1 mm 1345 Wheelbase (Kerb Weight) mm 2870 Front mm 1630 Tread (Kerb Weight) Rear mm 1635 Front mm 943.8, 933.4*2 Effective Head Room Rear mm 818.2 Front mm 1066.9 Effective Leg Room Rear mm 825.7 Front mm 1438.7 Shoulder Room Rear mm 1245.2 Front mm 1377.4 Hip Room Rear mm 1112.4 Couple Distance Front to Rear mm 850 Seating Capacity person 4 Coefficient of Drag 0.33 Min. Running Ground Clearance (Kerb Weight) mm 133 Kerb Weight kg 1930 - 1965 Gross Vehicle Weight kg 2375 Cargo Space VDA L 197 Fuel Tank Capacity L 82 Engine Engine Type 2UR-GSE No. of Cyls. & Arrangement 8-cylinders, V type Valve Mechanism 32-Valve, DOHC, Dual VVT-i Bore x Stroke mm 94.0 x 89.5 Displacement cm3 4969 Compression Ratio 12.3 : 1 Fuel Injection System EFI, D-4S Intake System Normal Aspiration Emission Certification EURO 6d Fuel Type Petrol Recommended Octane Rating RON 98 or higher Max. Output EEC kW/rpm (ps/rpm) 351/7100 (477/7100), 341/7100 (464/7100)*3 Max. Torque EEC Nm/rpm (kg-m/rpm) 540/4800 (55/4800), 530/4800 (54/4800)*3 NEDC Combined L/100km 11.60 Fuel Consumption WLTP Combined L/100km 11.55 NEDC Combined g/km 265.30 CO2 Emissions WLTP Combined g/km 262.31 Performance Max. Speed*4 km/h 270 Acceleration*4 0 to 100 km/h sec.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bmw 7 Series. 30 Carbon Core
    Sheer Driving Pleasure HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BMW 7 SERIES. 30 CARBON CORE. THE BMW 7 SERIES. Intelligent lightweight construction increases rigidity, improves driving dynamics and ensures greater efficiency. 32 BMW iPERFORMANCE. The innovative plug-in hybrid drivetrain has outstanding fuel consumption1 and emissions 1, 2 DRIVING LUXURY. figures , using only 2.0 – 2.5 l/100 km and emitting just 45 – 56 g/km of CO2. 38 BMW GESTURE CONTROL & BMW TOUCH COMMAND. BMW drivers and passenger benefit from intuitive and innovative operating concepts for controlling comfort, entertainment and navigation features. 40 BMW LASERLIGHT. In high beam mode, this lighting innovation doubles the maximum illumination range, reaching up to 600 metres. 42 SKY LOUNGE PANORAMIC GLASS SUNROOF & EXECUTIVE LOUNGE. The rear of the BMW 7 Series long-wheelbase model offers the highest travel comfort and a particularly stylish ambience. 1 The data for fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and energy consumption are determined in accordance with the measurements processes as defined by European Regulation (EU) 2007/715 in the applicable version. Data refer to a vehicle with base-level equipment in Germany, and the ranges account for differences according to the selected wheel and tyre size and the optional equipment and may change during the configuration process. 2 Values apply until end of 06/2018. THE MODELS SHOWN. 06 BMW 750Li xDRIVE1 WITH PURE EXCELLENCE INTERIOR: BMW TwinPower Turbo V8 petrol engine, 330 kW (450 hp), 20" light alloy wheels V-Spoke style 628, Bicolour with mixed tyres, Sophisto Grey brilliant effect exterior colour, seats in Ivory White exclusive Nappa leather, Poplar Grain Grey fine-wood interior trim.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Skoda Auto 2008
    SIMPLY CLEVER ŠkodaAuto ANNUAL REPORT 2008 PEOPLE BEHIND ŠKODA We stand on firm foundations built over a long history and tradition of automobile manufacturing. We offer attractive, functional, practical, and elegant vehicles at a high level of quality. We managed to further reinforce our positions in key world markets in 2008, despite the ongoing financial crisis. We are well prepared to meet growing competitive pressures and the knowledge and innovation of our people give us the strength and capacity to successfully face the risks and challenges to come. ŠKODA AUTO A COMPANY WITH A TRADITION AND A FUTURE 67.5 percent of total Škoda Auto Group sales volume was realized on European Union markets. 200.2 billion CZK was the total level of Škoda Auto Group revenues. 26,695 was the worldwide number of Škoda Auto Group employees at year end. 674,530 Škoda-brand vehicles were delivered to customers worldwide. 2,000,000th vehicle of the highly successful Škoda Octavia model line rolled off the assembly line in March. CONTENTS Selected Data and Financial Figures According to IFRS 3 Letter from the Chairman 4 2008 Milestones 6 Škoda Auto Group Profile 9 Who We Are 9 Whence We Come 11 Where We Stand 11 Product Portfolio 12 Statutory and Supervisory Boards of Škoda Auto 15 Board of Directors 15 Supervisory Board 20 Report of the Supervisory Board 22 Škoda Auto Corporate Governance 23 Declaration of Compliance with Codex of Corporate Governance Recommendations 23 Degree of Compliance with Codex of Corporate Governance Recommendations 23 Škoda Auto
    [Show full text]
  • The All-New 2017 Lexus Lc 500
    WINTERNEWSLETTER FEBRUARY 2016 IN THIS ISSUE THE ALL-NEW 2017 LEXUS LC 500 PAGE1 2016 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES Lexus LF-LC Concept debuted at the 2012 North American International Auto Show, the press, loyal customers, and enthusiasts PAGE2 NEW CAR wondered if the concept’s arresting styling and dramatic proportions SALES could ever evolve into a production 2+2 coupe. Today, four years after the debut of the breakthrough concept that inspired it, Lexus PAGE3 EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH has revealed the all-new LC 500 luxury coupe. This provocative, athletic flagship coupe—makes the strongest statement yet about PAGE3 PRE-OWNED the brand’s future product direction. SALES A NEW YEAR, A NEW RIDE! EXCLUSIVELY ON 2016 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES 2016 NX 200T % UP TO LEASE RATES AS LOW AS 2.9 40 MONTHS 2016 CT 200H UP TO FINANCE RATES AS LOW AS % NX 200T CT 200H 0.9 36 MONTHS 1 I ARE YOU 519.979.1900 9375 Tecumseh Rd E, Windsor, ON A MEMBER? www.lexusofwindsor.com WINTERNEWSLETTER The past five years have seen Lexus evolve rapidly with the creation of the luxury brand’s globally-focused organization, Lexus International. Exciting new models involving elevated levels of emotional styling and dynamic driving characteristics such as NX, RC, and IS have also helped propel the brand’s shift with consumers. Akio Toyoda has been at the center of the Lexus global expansion, personally driving a heightened level of collaboration between design, engineering and marketing teams to help build a luxury brand better suited to meet the needs of the next generation of consumers.
    [Show full text]