Chronology of Megalithic Culture: An Appraisal

Tilok Thakuria1

1. Department of History and Archaeology, North Eastern Hill University, Tura Campus, Chandmari, Meghalaya‐794002 (Email: [email protected])

Received: 05 August 2014; Accepted: 09 September 2014; Revised: 3 October 2014 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 2 (2014): 651‐657

Abstract: The presence of Megalithic monuments in Vidarbha came to limelight for the first time in 1847. British officials deputed in the region recovered and excavated many of the Megalithic sites during the pre‐independent phase. Systematic and scientific research on Megalithic in the region was, however, initiated by S. B. Deo in 1960. It was his initiative that samples for 14C dates were collected and dated. Based on these obtained dates, Deo proposed a time bracket of 700‐800 BC for the Megalithic culture in the region. However, a re‐look into these dates and some other recent findings suggest that the beginning of the Megalithic culture in the region may go earlier than 700‐800 BC. The present paper tries to evaluate both the available absolute and relative dates and argue for a possibility of pushing back the date for the beginning of Megalithic culture in Vidarbha.

Keywords: Megaliths, Neolithic, Vidarbha, Excavation, Exploration, Chronology, Absolute Date

Introduction The Megalithic culture in is known for the early use of iron besides construction of burial monuments. The culture was prevalent in almost all parts of India. The tradition of constructing burials and celebrating elaborate funeral rituals is still prevalent in some of parts of India, for example, Northeast India (Hutton 1929, Haimendrof 1943). In , the culture is mainly found spread in the eastern part of the state known as Vidarbha. Vidarbha consists of eleven eastern most districts of Maharashtra state, viz. Buldhana, Akola, Amaravati, Yavatmal, Wardha, , Bhandara, Chandrapur, Godchiroli, Kholapur and Gondia. Majority of the sites, however, are located in the districts of Nagpur, Wardha and Chandrapur. In addition to Vidarbha, there are reports of architectural features resembling Megalithic burial in the north‐western portion of Maharashtra state (IAR 1968‐70:27‐29, Mane 1985). However, presence of such features outside the core region of Vidarbha should not be taken seriously as these have been reported on the basis of surface observations only. For instance, architectural features resembling a Megalithic burial were reported from Theur in Pune, which proved to be the architectural remains of a culture ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 2: 2014

after excavation (IAR ‐ 1969‐70: 27‐29). Therefore, one needs to be very careful in assigning any architectural remains to Megalithic culture just on the basis of similarities observed on the surface.

Presence of Megalithic monuments in Vidarbha came to attention when Revered Stephen Hislop noticed and excavated one such monument at Takalghat in 1847 (Mohanty and Thakuria 2014). In the subsequent years, Hislop also dug ‘a few’ Megalithic burials at Junapani (Carnac 1879: 2‐3). He planned to excavate at Takalghat again in 1863 on the request of Mr. Temple, then commissioner of Nagpur. However, Hislop died crossing a nala while coming back from a field visit at Takalghat in September 1863 (Hunter 1964). Pottery and some notes on Takalghat were found in the pocket of his jacket when his dead body was found. His observations and notes on excavations could not come to light for his untimely death. After 20 years of Hislop’s discovery and excavation at Takalghat, Major G.G. Pearse excavated the site of Kamptee in 1867 and published the report of the same in 1869 (Pearse 1869). This was the first published report on excavation of Megalithic burials in Vidarbha. Although Major Pearse is often quoted as the first person to excavate Megalithic burials in Vidarbha in many of the historiographic writings, he was third in number after Hislop and Carnac. Carnac excavated Megalithic burials at Junapani few months before the excavation at Kamptee by Major Pearse in 1867. Carnac published the report in 1879 after many years of his excavation at Junapani (Carnac 1879).

During sixties of the last century, Deo started investigation on Megalithic culture of the region. He conducted a series of excavations and explorations, which produced valuable information on typology, technology, material culture, subsistence pattern, settlement system, ecology and socio‐economic life of the Megalithic people of Vidarbha (Deo 1970, 1973a; Deo and Jamkhedkar 1982). Other agencies like Archaeological Survey of India; Department of Archaeology and Museum, Government of Maharashtra; Nagpur University, Nagpur and Deccan College, Pune also conducted a series of extensive systematic and scientific researches on the Megalithic culture in the region (Deglurkar and Lad 1992; Nath 2002; Mohanty 2003, IAR 1958‐59: 21, 1961‐62:32‐33 , 1977‐78: 39, 1979‐80: 58,1978‐79: 71, 1980‐81: 40, 1981‐ 82:51‐52, 1982‐83: 61‐62, 1983‐84: 57‐58, 1984‐85: 53‐54). Excavations and explorations conducted by above individuals and institutions resulted in finding and reporting of more than 100 Megalithic sites in Vidarbha (Thakuria 2010). However, habitation sites belonging to Megalithic culture is less in number compared to burial sites. Only 10 Megalithic habitation sites have been reported from the region so far. All of the habitation sites have been excavated.

The chronology of Vidarbha Megalithic culture has been constructed on the basis of 14C dates available from a few excavated sites. It was actually Deo’s effort and initiative that produced first 14C dates for the Megalithic culture of Vidarbha. His work on Megalithic Vidarbha was inclusive and multi‐disciplinary. During the course of excavation at the site of Takalghat in 1969, he collected samples for 14C dates (Deo

652 Thakuria 2014: 651‐657

1970). This was the first time radiocarbon samples were collected from a Megalithic site in Vidarbha. Subsequently, he collected samples for 14C dates from the sites of Naikund, Bhgimohari and Khairwada also (Deo 1973b, 1973c, 1998). Based on the obtained dates from these sites, Deo proposed a time bracket of 700‐800 BC for the Megalithic culture in Vidarbha.

However, it was Major Pearse who for the first time speculated on the chronology of Vidarbha Megaliths (Pearse 1869). He speculated a date of 1200 BC for the beginning of Megalithic culture in the region. He argued on two main points. First, he argued that Megalithic builders were neither Buddhist nor Hindus and, therefore, must have existed before the advent of in the region (Pearse 1869: 215). In support of his argument, he gave the example of the site of Kamptee which did not reveal any material evidence related to either Buddhisim or . The fact observed by Pearse a long time back still holds true. There is still no consolidated evidence to relate the Megalithic culture of Vidarbha either to Buddhism or Hinduism. There was discovery of a tripod of iron having motifs of fish, dear and bird from excavation at Mahurajhari (Mohanty 2005). This tripod though considered as ideo ‐technomic object does not reveal religious affiliation of Megalithic people to any religion (Mohanty and Thakuria 2014).

Major Pearse’s second point of argument was related to the use of coins. According to him, Megalithic builders neither knew the use of coins nor were having any knowledge of writing and, therefore, must have existed before 330 BC (Pearse 1869:215). He considered 330 BC as it was the date believed for the beginning of coins and writing in India during his time. To strengthen his argument, he gave the reference of the term “Kershas”, which was mentioned by Manu. According to him, the Megalithic builders might have knowledge of coins if they were contemporary to Manu (Pearse 1869:215). Taking into account all these facts, Major Pearse suggested 1200 BC for the beginning of Megalithic culture in Vidarbha. Though his chronology was based on speculation, it still holds certain relevance. First, so far no coin has been recovered from any of the excavated Megalithic burials from any of the sites in Vidarbha. Though not from Megaliths, early coins have been reported from Vidarbha (Patil 1991; Gupta 1999). Second, there is no finding of script or writing from Vidarbha Megaliths except graffiti marks on potsherd. The early date of using script and coins in India can now safely be placed to 600 BC (Daraniyagala 1990, Gupta 2013). No finding of coins and script from Vidarbha Megaliths suggest that these were not part of their socio‐economic and socio‐ cultural behaviour. However, non‐availability of coins and script in Vidarbha Megaliths may also denote the beginning of Megalithic culture prior to coinage and Brhami script in India. So, what would be the date of the beginning of this culture in Vidarbha if Megalithic builders antedate 600 BC? Taking into consideration all the facts discussed above, it indeed looks realistic to believe Major Pearse speculated date for the beginning of Vidarbha Megalithic culture.

A date at the end of end of second millennium BC or beginning of the first millennium

653 BC for the beginning of Megalithic culture in Vidarbha gets further strength if one re‐ considers the chronology of Kaundinyapur, located in Amaravati district, proposed by M.G. Dikshit. The cultural sequence at the site was divided into six periods. The earliest period was assigned to Megalithic culture based on recovered artefacts and other material remains identical to Megalithic culture (Dikshit 1968). of South Indian Megalithic types and similar types of etched carnelian beads as found from the South Indian Megalithic sites inspired Dikshit to assign the lower most cultural assemblage as Megalithic. Dikshit (1968:28) wrote: “The dating of our Periods I will depend on the firm date for the Black and red ware. Their interrelationship in so far the sequence of cultures at Kaundinyapur is concerned, we are now in a definite position to antedate the Megalithic to the black and red ware people but how much anterior we cannot say. They in a way corroborate the sequence of cultures obtained elsewhere as at Gilund, Ahar and the South Indian megaliths”.

Present excavations and explorations suggest that occurrence of Black and Red ware has broad chrono‐cultural differences in pan Indian level from the Neolithic to Early Historic period. Hence, it may be difficult to date a culture just on the basis of comparison of occurrence of Black and Red ware with other sites if does not correspond to same culture period or phase. However, Dikshit reasonably placed Period III at the site to about ‘200 BC’ as this period revealed the remains of NBPW and punch marked coins. Consequently he dated period II roughly from 800‐600 BC as there was no evidence of NBPW and punch marked coins in this period. As a result Period I which is Megalithic at the site will antedate 800 BC. The site was recently excavated by Deccan College and radiocarbon samples were collected both from the lower most levels as well as from the upper levels. The dates came within a radiocarbon time bracket of 300‐700 BC and calibrated dates range from 300‐800 BC (Mishra et al. n.d). The earliest deposit, which according to Dikshit was Megalithic now comes under the 14C time bracket of 800 BC. The recent absolute date at least confirms that the Megalithic period at the site is not later than 800 BC. However, these two samples were taken from one trench only as excavation was of a limited nature. Therefore, it is difficult to generalize the date of a cultural horizon in an extensive site like Kaundinyapur just on the basis of two samples and that too taken from a particular area. For that reason, the recent absolute date of 800 BC can be taken as evidence for the presence of Megalithic culture at the site around 800 BC only and not as a date for the beginning of the culture at the site.

The 14C dates provided by Deo from Takalghat and Naikund also need to be revised for two main reasons. First, those dates were non‐calibrated. Second, samples were collected from the middle layers of habitation at both the sites. Therefore, a considerable amount of deposit remained undated. At Takalghat, sample was collected from phase IB. The Megalithic deposit at the site was divided into three phases as IA, IB and IC. The sample collected from IB was at the depth of 3.03m below the surface. Phase IA was 2.90m in thickness which clearly shows that a large amount of deposit remained undated. Turning our attention to the site of Naikund, we find that a total of Thakuria 2014: 651‐657 eleven dates were obtained from different layers at the site. No sample was collected from layer 9 which is the lower most layers at Naikund. In addition, obtained dates show inconsistency between dates from upper levels and lower levels. For example, the non‐calibrated date from layer 8 came as 410±100 BC whereas sample from layer 4 came as 690±110 BC. The inconsistencies in these dates suggest that non‐calibrated dates from Takalghat and Niakund represent only the middle phase of Megalithic culture in the region. There is a certain need to collect fresh radiocarbon samples from both the sites for absolute dating.

There was a report of finding a Neolithic axe at Naikund from one of the excavated burials (Rajaguru 1982). The stone on which the axe was fashioned is not available in Nagpur and Chandrapur, similar stone has been found in Peninsular India (Rajaguru 1982: 64). Typologically the axe resembles the Neolithic tradition of Andhra‐Karnataka Neolithic tradition (Deo 1984). The recent excavation at Mahurjhari also produced Neolithic tools belonging to late Neolithic tradition of South India (Mohanty 2005). Recently a time bracket of 1400 to 1200 BC has been proposed for Neolithic‐Megalithic transition phase on the basis of AMS dates from South India (Fuller et al n.d.). Considering finding of late Neolithic artefacts from Megalithic culture in Vidarbha and the dates of Neolithic‐Megalithic transition Phase from South India, it is reasonable to suggest the beginning of Megalithic culture towards the first millennium BC or towards the end of second millennium BC in Vidarbha.

Summary In summary, it can be suggested that there is a need to initiate investigations on Vidarbha Megalithic culture with a prime aim to collect fresh radiocarbon samples for absolute dating. From the above discussion, it becomes clear that there are some shortcomings in the radiocarbon dates available so far. These dates just tell us about the existence of the culture around 700‐800 BC which in no way can be considered as the date for the beginning of the culture in the region. Fresh dates will certainly provide a scope to push back the beginning of the culture in this region to the first millennium BC or to the end of the second millennium BC.

References Carnac, R. 1902. Ancient Indian Beads. In: Journal of Art and Industry, 9(70‐80), pp: 5‐12. Daraniyagala, S. U. 1990. Radio Carbon dating of early Brahmi script in Sri , In: Ancient Ceylon 11:149‐168. Deglurkar, G.B. and Lad, G. 1992. Megalithi cRaipur (1985‐1990), Deccan College: Pune. Deo, S. B. 1970. Excavation at Takalghat and Khapa (1968‐69). Nagpur University: Nagpur. Deo, S. B. 1973a. Mahurjhari Excavations. Nagpur University: Nagpur: Deo, S. B. 1973b. Problem of South Indian Megaliths. Kannada Research Institute, Karnataka University: Dharwar:

655 ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 2: 2014

Deo, S. B. 1973c. The Dating of Megalithicin Maharashtra and some new evidence. In: Agarwal, D. P. and A. Gosh. (eds.) Radiocarbon and Indian Archaeology. Tata Institute of Fundamental research: Bombay, pp: 131‐137. Deo, S. B. 1984. The Genesis of Maharashtra History and Culture. In: Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute, 43, pp: 17‐36. Deo, S. B. 1998. Iron in Peninsular India. In: Verma, T. P. (ed.) Dating in Indian Archaeology: Problems and Perspectives. Mysore: Bharatiya Itihas Sankalan Samiti, pp: 57‐61. Deo, S. B. and A. P. Jamkhedkar. 1982. Excavations at Naikund 1978‐80. Department of Archaeology and Museum, Government of Maharashtra: Bombay. Dikshit, M. G. 1968. Excavations at Kaundinyapur. Government of Maharashtra: Bombay. Fuller, D., N. Boivin. and R. Korisetter. (n.d) Dating the Neolithic of South India: new radiometric evidence for key economic, social and ritual transformations (online): www. homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~tcrndfu/articles/Fuller%20et%20al%20 Ashmo und%20AMS.(Accessed on 28/7/2014). Gupta, P.L. 1999. Satavahana Coins in Archaeological Excavations. In: Shastri A. M. (ed.) The Age of the Satavahanas. Aryan Books International: New Delhi, Vol. II, pp: 223‐277. Gupta, P.L. 2013. Coins (Fourth edition, reprint). National Book Trust: New Delhi. Hamendrof, C. F. 1943. The Naked Nagas. Oxford University Press: London. Hunter, R. 1864. Obituary. In: American Philosophy Journal (New Series) XIX (I), pp: 169‐ 70. Hutton, J. H. 1929. Assam Megaliths. In: Antiquity, 3, pp: 324‐338 IAR. Indian Archaeology‐a Review. Archaeological Survey of India: New Delhi. Mane, G. K. 1985. Dakkhanmadhil Bruhadashmagugina Samskriti. Unpublished thesis (Ph. D), Nagpur University, Nagpur. Mishra, S., G. Shete and B.C. Deotare. (n.d) Excavations at Kaundinyapur 2000‐2001. In: Mohanty, R. K. and K. K. Basa. (eds.) Megalithic Traditions in archaeology and Ethnography. In press. Mohanty, R. K. 2003. A preliminary Report on the Excavations at Mahurjhari, 2001‐ 2002: a Megalithicand Early Historic Site in Vidarbha, Maharashtra. In: Pratnatattva, 9, pp:41‐48. Mohanty, R. K. 2005. Excavations at Mahurjhari and Exploration in Vidarbha, Maharashtra. In: Annual Report of Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute, 2004‐2005, pp76‐77. Mohanty, R. K. and T. Thakuria. 2014. Early Megalithic Culture of Peninsular and South India. In: Chakrabarti, D. K. and M. Lal. (eds.) History of Ancient India : Vol‐III: The Texts, Political History and Administration Till C. 200 B.C., Aryan Publisher and Vivakananda Centre: New Delhi, pp.343‐378. Nath, A. 2002. Excavation at Panchkheri: a MegalithicHabitation Site. In: Puratattva, 32, pp:81‐88. Patil, S. S. 1991. Punch marked Coins of , Numismatic Digest, 15, pp:5‐ 9.

656 Thakuria 2014: 651‐657

Pearse, G. 1869. Notes on the Excavation of a Stone circle near Kamptee in Central Province of India. In: Ethnography Society of London, 4, pp: 428‐429. Rajaguru, S. N. 1982. A Note on the Petrographic Composition of a Polished Axe. In: De, S.B and A.P. Jamkhedkar. (eds.) Naikund Excavations 1978‐80. Deccan College: Pune, pp:68 Thakuria, T. 2010. The society and economy during Early Iron Age and Early Historic period in Deccan with special reference to beads (1000 BC to 500 AD). Unpublished thesis (Ph.D), Deccan College PGRI: Pune.

657