DOCSLIB.ORG

Asset Description Metadata Schema Specification Version 1.00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asset Description Metadata Schema Specification Version 1.00 ADMS ASSET DESCRIPTION METADATA SCHEMA SPECIFICATION VERSION 1.00 2 DOCUMENT METADATA Property Value Release date 18/04/2012 Status: Final Version: 1.00 Statement of copyright: This specification is released under the “ISA Open Metadata Licence v1.1” that can be retrieved from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/category/licence/isa-open-metadata-licence-v11. This specification was prepared for the ISA programme by: PwC EU Services Disclaimer: The views expressed in this draft specification are purely those of the authors and may not, in any circumstances, be interpreted as stating an official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information included in this study, nor does it accept any responsibility for any use thereof. Reference herein to any specific products, specifications, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by the European Commission. All care has been taken by the author to ensure that s/he has obtained, where necessary, permission to use any parts of manuscripts including illustrations, maps, and graphs, on which intellectual property rights already exist from the titular holder(s) of such rights or from her/his or their legal representative. This draft specification can be downloaded from the ISA website: http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/release/10 3 CHANGE LOG In the list below are the changes that were made since version 0.91. Issue Section Change Throughout Harmonised footnotes Throughout Made minor editorial corrections and corrected cross-references 5 Changed capitalisation of data types, properties and relationships 5.1 Added section to explain relationship between general concepts and Semantic Asset specialisation 5.2, 5.5 Renamed main concepts Semantic Asset, Semantic Asset Distribution and Semantic Asset Repository 4, 5.2, 5.6, 6 Renamed Domain to Theme, added Theme Taxonomy 5.2 Revised example of Asset without Distribution and Asset with multiple Distributions (ADMS 1.0) 5.3 Revised UML diagram to show general concepts, properties and relationships and how ADMS for Semantic Assets is related to that model 5.4 Added optional elements to data type code in line with definition in CCTS 5.5.1 Deleted relationship Asset.documentation and added four separate relationships Asset.home page, Asset.main documentation, Asset. related documentation and Asset.related web page 5.5.1 Added property Metadata Date and relationships Metadata Language and Metadata Publisher to Asset 214 5.5.3 Added Repository.includes as reverse property of Asset.repository origin 219 5.5.2 Added Distribution.distribution of as reverse property of Asset.distribution 5.5.2 Deleted Repository Origin relationship for Distribution as this relationship can be derived through the Asset 274 5.5.2 Changed cardinality of Distribution.Licence to 1..*, and added note related to multiple licenses 5.6.2 Added attribute id to Contact Information and added reference to vCard, RFC6350 5.6.9 Changed label to name to make it consistent with RADion 5.6.10 Added attribute id to Period of Time 6 Removed section on Documentation type vocabulary (now implemented as separate relationships) and Domain vocabulary (which was replaced by Theme). Renamed the section of Subject vocabularies to Theme vocabularies. Added section on Theme Taxonomy 277 6.2 Corrected references to ISO/DIS 25964-2 279 6.4 Added more examples of geographic vocabularies and added reference to the ISA Core Location Vocabulary. 7 Added description of RDF and XML schemas. Annex I Added annex with URIs for ADMS-specific vocabularies 1 http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/release/09 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ADMS ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Asset Description Metadata Schema ............................................................................................ 1 Specification .................................................................................................................................. 1 version 1.00 ................................................................................................................................... 1 Document Metadata ...................................................................................................................... 2 Change log .................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of contents ........................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Background and objectives .................................................................................................... 8 1.1 About the ISA Programme ................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Terminology ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Levels of data ................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 A model facilitating federation .......................................................................................... 9 2. Approach .............................................................................................................................. 10 3. Related work ........................................................................................................................ 11 4. Use case .............................................................................................................................. 12 5. Conceptual model ................................................................................................................ 16 5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 16 5.2 Domain model................................................................................................................. 16 5.3 UML diagram .................................................................................................................. 18 5.4 Data Types ..................................................................................................................... 20 5.5 Main Concepts ................................................................................................................ 20 5.5.1 Concept: Semantic Asset ........................................................................................ 20 5.5.2 Concept: Semantic Asset Distribution ..................................................................... 22 5.5.3 Concept: Semantic Asset Repository ...................................................................... 23 5.6 Supporting Concepts ...................................................................................................... 23 5.6.1 Concept: Asset Type ............................................................................................... 23 5.6.2 Concept: Contact Information .................................................................................. 23 5.6.3 Concept: Documentation ......................................................................................... 24 5.6.4 Concept: File Format ............................................................................................... 24 5.6.5 Concept: Geographic Coverage .............................................................................. 24 5 5.6.6 Concept: Item .......................................................................................................... 24 5.6.7 Concept: Interoperability Level ................................................................................ 24 5.6.8 Concept: Language ................................................................................................. 25 5.6.9 Concept: Licence ..................................................................................................... 25 5.6.10 Concept: Period of Time ...................................................................................... 25 5.6.11 Concept: Publisher .............................................................................................. 25 5.6.12 Concept: Representation Technique ................................................................... 25 5.6.13 Concept: Status ................................................................................................... 26 5.6.14 Concept: Theme .................................................................................................. 26 5.6.15 Concept: Theme Taxonomy ................................................................................ 26 5.7 Multilingual considerations ............................................................................................. 26 6. Controlled vocabularies ........................................................................................................ 28 6.1 Interoperability level Vocabulary .................................................................................... 28 6.2 Asset type Vocabulary ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Geographic profiles FAO Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles provide an overview of the Related information activities and trends in fisheries and aquaculture for individual countries. National Aquaculture Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles - fact sheets Sector Overview (NASO) fact sheets FAO Country Profiles and Mapping Information System National Aquaculture For aquaculture, FAO provides statistics and prepares information on the global Legislation Overview status and trends of the aquaculture sector, facilitating cooperation in the collation (NALO) - fact sheets at the global level of national and regional data from which it produces global assessments on the state of aquaculture and development trends. The Fisheries and FAO Country Profiles Aquaculture Department compiles National Aquaculture Sector Overviews and Mapping (NASO) and National Aquaculture Legislation Overviews (NALO) to Information System disseminate this information. Related links National Aquaculture Sector Overview (NASO) fact sheets National Aquaculture Legislation Overview (NALO) - fact sheets Regional fishery bodies (RFB) - fact sheets The fisheries sector requires the definition of boundaries at sea for statistical data- gathering, fisheries management and jurisdictional purposes. FAO Major Fishing Areas are arbitrary areas defined for statistical purposes, the boundaries of which were determined in consultation with international fishery agencies on various considerations. FAO Major Fishing Areas - fact sheetsRegional Fishery Bodies (RFBs) contribute to the international governance of fisheries, particularly for those exploiting highly migratory resources or managing resources straddling across exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Improving the global governance of fisheries requires increasing the number of RFBs and the associated areas of competence at sea for these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) Liaison to IFLA
    ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) liaison to IFLA Annual Report 2015 TC46 on Information and documentation has been leading efforts related to information management since 1947. Standards1 developed under ISO/TC46 facilitate access to knowledge and information and standardize automated tools, computer systems, and services relating to its major stakeholders of: libraries, publishing, documentation and information centres, archives, records management, museums, indexing and abstracting services, and information technology suppliers to these communities. TC46 has a unique role among ISO information-related committees in that it focuses on the whole lifecycle of information from its creation and identification, through delivery, management, measurement, and archiving, to final disposition. *** The following report summarizes activities of TC46, SC4, SC8 SC92 and their resolutions of the annual meetings3, in light of the key-concepts of interest to the IFLA community4. 1. SC4 Technical interoperability 1.1 Activities Standardization of protocols, schemas, etc. and related models and metadata for processes used by information organizations and content providers, including libraries, archives, museums, publishers, and other content producers. 1.2 Active Working Group WG 11 – RFID in libraries WG 12 – WARC WG 13 – Cultural heritage information interchange WG 14 – Interlibrary Loan Transactions 1.3 Joint working groups 1 For the complete list of published standards, cfr. Appendix A. 2 ISO TC46 Subcommittees: TC46/SC4 Technical interoperability; TC46/SC8 Quality - Statistics and performance evaluation; TC46/SC9 Identification and description; TC46/SC 10 Requirements for document storage and conditions for preservation - Cfr Appendix B. 3 The 42nd ISO TC46 plenary, subcommittee and working groups meetings, Beijing, June 1-5 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation Between Developing Countries in the WTO
    Differentiation between Developing Countries in the WTO Report 2004:14 E Foto: Mats Pettersson Differentiation between Developing Countries in the WTO Swedish Board of Agriculture International Affairs Division June 2004 Authors: Jonas Kasteng Arne Karlsson Carina Lindberg Contents PROLOGUE.......................................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Purpose of the study............................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Limitations of the study ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Background to the discussion on differentiation................................................................................ 10 1.4 Present differentiation between developing countries in the WTO.................................................... 12 1.5 Relevance of present differentiation between developing countries in the WTO .............................. 13 1.6 Outline of the new differentiation initiative......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Standardization Plan 2019-2022
    FINAL APRIL 2020 NATIONAL STANDARDIZATION PLAN 2019-2022 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Economic Priorities (Economic Impact Strategy) ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Government Policy Priorities ............................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Non-Economic Priorities (Social Impact Strategy) ............................................................................ 14 3.4 Stakeholders requests (Stakeholder Engagement Strategy) ............................................................. 15 3.5 Selected Sectors of Standardization and Expected Benefits ............................................................. 16 3.5.2 Benefits of Selected Sectors and Sub-Sectors of Standardization ................................................ 17 4 Needed Human and Financial Resources and Work Items Implementation Plan............................................ 19 4.1 Human Resources by Type of Work Item and Category ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Composition of ISO 25964 Hierarchical Relations (BTG, BTP, BTI)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Int J Digit Libr (2016) 17:39–48 DOI 10.1007/s00799-015-0162-2 On the composition of ISO 25964 hierarchical relations (BTG, BTP, BTI) Vladimir Alexiev1 · Antoine Isaac2 · Jutta Lindenthal3 Received: 12 January 2015 / Revised: 29 July 2015 / Accepted: 4 August 2015 / Published online: 20 August 2015 © The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Knowledge organization systems (KOS) can use In addition, we relax some of the constraints assigned to the different types of hierarchical relations: broader generic ISO properties, namely the fact that hierarchical relationships (BTG), broader partitive (BTP), and broader instantial apply to SKOS concepts only. This allows us to apply them (BTI). The latest ISO standard on thesauri (ISO 25964) to the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT), where has formalized these relations in a corresponding OWL they are also used for non-concepts (facets, hierarchy names, ontology (De Smedt et al., ISO 25964 part 1: thesauri for guide terms). In this paper, we present extensive examples information retrieval: RDF/OWL vocabulary, extension of derived from the recent publication of AAT as linked open SKOS and SKOS-XL. http://purl.org/iso25964/skos-thes, data. 2013) and expressed them as properties: broaderGeneric, broaderPartitive, and broaderInstantial, respectively. These Keywords Thesauri · ISO 25964 · BTG · BTP · BTI · relations are used in actual thesaurus data. The composition- Broader generic · Broader partitive · Broader instantial · ality of these types of hierarchical relations has not been AAT investigated systematically yet.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Country Profiles Survey
    FAO Country Profiles survey 1. When was the last time you visited the FAO Country Profiles Portal? Response Response Percent Count Today 38.2% 84 Last week 15.0% 33 One month ago 16.8% 37 Six months ago 6.4% 14 More than one year 7.3% 16 I don’t know 16.4% 36 answered question 220 skipped question 3 2. How often do you visit the FAO Country Profiles Portal? Response Response Percent Count Daily 6.5% 14 Weekly 17.6% 38 Monthly 18.1% 39 Once/twice per quarter 17.1% 37 Once/twice per year 9.3% 20 I don’t know 11.1% 24 This is my first visit. 20.4% 44 answered question 216 skipped question 7 1 of 14 3. What are the three (3) types of information that you find most useful on the Portal. Rating Response First Second Third Average Count Country offices contacts 52.5% (32) 26.2% (16) 21.3% (13) 6.62 61 Country codes and names 24.0% (6) 60.0% (15) 16.0% (4) 6.16 25 FAO members and flags 25.0% (4) 43.8% (7) 31.3% (5) 5.88 16 Low Income Food Deficit Countries 25.7% (9) 48.6% (17) 25.7% (9) 6.00 35 Maps 14.0% (6) 44.2% (19) 41.9% (18) 5.44 43 News/events 23.4% (11) 31.9% (15) 44.7% (21) 5.57 47 Publications 26.7% (20) 45.3% (34) 28.0% (21) 5.97 75 Statistics 53.6% (67) 27.2% (34) 19.2% (24) 6.69 125 Thematic country profiles 37.8% (34) 20.0% (18) 42.2% (38) 5.91 90 Others 12.5% (3) 12.5% (3) 75.0% (18) 4.75 24 answered question 196 skipped question 27 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Tratamento À Organização Da Informação Reflexões Sobre Concepções, Perspectivas E Tendências
    Do tratamento à Organização da Informação Reflexões sobre concepções, perspectivas e tendências Maria Graça Simões Gercina Ângela de Lima COORDENAÇÃO IMPRENSA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA COIMBRA UNIVERSITY PRESS Esta obra apresenta uma reflexão teórica e histórica sobre as noções clássicas de tratamento da informação e de organização da informação, com base na esfera epistemológica da organização do conhecimento. É Composta de oito capítulos que discorrem sobre (1) as variações terminológicas produzidas na Ciência e no Ensino Brasileiro e Português, (2) a discussão de aspectos teórico-conceituais da organização e representação da informação e a sua correlação com os aspectos práticos que envolvem os ambientes informacionais digitais; (3) o delineamento conceitual inerente à representação da informação feito a partir da discussão da catalogação como confluência de aspectos descritivos, temáticos, contextuais e de acesso à informação de modo que a interconexão entre eles esteja assegurada; (4) as diferentes perspectivas teóricas e metodológicas sobre a modelagem de domínios aplicados à elaboração de ferramentas de representação e recuperação de informação, no contexto das redes eletrônicas de informação e comunicação; (5) a identificação e exploração dos aspectos da variação terminológica na produção científica sobre Organização da Informação relativos aos termos Análise Documentária e Análise de Assunto; (6) as aplicações de representação de recurso informacional, os contextos e processos onde as inovações derivadas da ciência da computação, da inteligência artificial, da área de processamento de linguagem natural e de novas plataformas de bancos de dados têm transformado o contexto de produção de documentos, de sistemas de organização do conhecimento, de métodos de exploração semântica e de visualização.
    [Show full text]
  • Conception of a Workflow for the Semi-Automatic Construction of a
    Conception of a Workflow for the Semi-automatic Construction of a ... 217 Conception of a Workflow for the Semi-automatic Construction of a Thesaurus for the German Printing Industry Anette Siebenkäs, Bernd Markscheffel Technische Universität Ilmenau Fachgebiet Informations- und Wissensmanagement Helmholtzplatz 3 (Oeconomicum), 98693 Ilmenau, Germany {anette.siebenkaes, bernd.markscheffel}@tu-ilmenau.de Abstract During the BMWI granted project “Print-IT”, the need of a thesaurus based uniform and consistent language for the German printing industry became evident. In this paper we introduce a semi-automatic construction approach for such a thesaurus and present a workflow which supports users to generate thesaurus typical information structures from relevant digitalized resources with the help of common IT-tools. Keywords: Information organization, Information retrieval, Thesauri 1 Introduction In Germany, the printing industry is largely based on small and medium- sized enterprises (SME) (bvdm 2012) which can benefit from networks to use synergy effects including their target groups. Therefore, a research pro- ject named “Print-IT” granted by BMWI was established. The project part- ners are TU Ilmenau, HTWK Leipzig, SID Leipzig and several SME’s of the printing industry. Main aim of this project was to build an integration plat- In: F. Pehar/C. Schlögl/C. Wolff (Eds.). Re:inventing Information Science in the Networked Society. Proceedings of the 14 th International Symposium on Information Science (ISI 2015), Zadar, Croatia, 19 th —21 st May 2015. Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch, pp. 217—229. 218 Session 3: Information/Data Retrieval, Visualization and Mapping form where SME’s can provide order- or product-specific goods and services (Eine, Stelzer 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The ISO 25964 Data Model for the Structure of an Information Retrieval Thesaurus
    Leonard Will - Willpower Information, Enfield, UK The ISO 25964 Data Model for the Structure of an Information Retrieval Thesaurus Abstract International standard ISO 25964-1:2011 – Thesauri for information retrieval, includes a detailed data model for thesaurus structure. It is intended to provide a rigorous presentation of the elements and relationships which will not only clarify and standardise the varying and conflicting interpretations which exist but which can also be implemented consistently in automated systems. It makes a clear distinction between concepts and the terms which are used to label them, and includes other features that may be present in a thesaurus, such as compound equivalence, arrays and node labels, concept groups, notes and version history. Introduction The recently-published international standard, ISO 25964-1:2011 – Thesauri for informa- tion retrieval, presents a data model for thesaurus structure which is more extensive than any published previously. The model is shown in Figure 1, using UML conventions (Object Management Group, 2007). Previous thesaurus standards are summarised by Dextre Clarke and Zeng (2011), so they will not be discussed here other than to note that they did not provide a model for the structure of thesaurus data. The new model is intended to provide a rigorous presentation of the entities and relationships which will not only clarify and standardise the varying and conflicting interpretations which exist but which can also be implemented consistently in automated systems. The SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) format (W3C, 2009) is designed to present KOS data in a format that is suitable for machine inferencing and particularly for use in the Semantic Web.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Thesaurus to Develop It Inquiry Systems
    Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 10 th April 2016. Vol.86. No.1 © 2005 - 2016 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved . ISSN: 1992-8645 www.jatit.org E-ISSN: 1817-3195 USING THE THESAURUS TO DEVELOP IT INQUIRY SYSTEMS FEDOTOV A.M. 1, TUSUPOV J.A. 2, SAMBETBAYEVA M.A. 2, SAGNAYEVA S.K. 2, BAPANOV A.A. 2, NURGULZHANOVA A.N. 3, YERIMBETOVA A.S. 2 1Institute of Computational Technologies, Siberian Branch of the RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation 2L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan 3 M.Tynyshpaev Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communications, Almaty, Kazakhstan E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The article describes the standards of thesauruses, as well as their possible usage in scientific and educational information systems. The authors compare the various approaches to the description of the data schema based on the object model. Particular attention is paid to SKOS and Zthes data schemes, and the second one has been selected for implementation. The study also considered the work with dictionaries of key terms used for the organization and classification of information resources. Keywords: Z39.50, data schema, SKOS, Zthes, MARC, VDEX, MODS, information system, electronic library, dictionary, directory, database, information retrieval thesaurus, metadata. 1. INTRODUCTION the necessary documents, the systematization and classification of documents in accordance with the The development of information technology in task. In order to satisfy information needs of general, as well as in the field of communication today's users, support for complex retrieval and information processing, in particular, has led functions and classification of the information are to the emergence of fundamentally new required, as well as viewing of the resources by opportunities for organizing virtually all the phases categories (headings) and by dictionary-classifiers.
    [Show full text]
  • GVP LOD: ONTOLOGIES and SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION Vladimir Alexiev, Data and Ontology Group, Ontotext Corp
    GVP LOD: ONTOLOGIES AND SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION Vladimir Alexiev, Data and Ontology Group, Ontotext Corp CIDOC Congress, Dresden, Germany 2014-09-05: International Terminology Working Group: full version (HTML, PDF, slideshare) 2014-09-09: Getty special session: short version (HTML, PDF, slideshare) Press O for overview, H for help. Proudly made in plain text with reveal.js, org-reveal, org-mode and emacs. TABLE OF CONTENTS Getty Vocabularies LOD GVP Vocabulary Data External Ontologies GVP Semantic Representation TGN Specifics: Concept-Place Duality Inference Documentation GVP LOD Usage GETTY VOCABULARIES LOD http://vocab.getty.edu Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): released Feb 2014 Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN): released Aug 2014 Work continues with: Unified List of Artist Names (ULAN) Cultural Object Names Authority (CONA) Getty Museum data AATA bibliography Museum and CONA are more complex, involves LIDO/CDWA-lite XML to CIDOC CRM (RDF) CULTURAL HERITAGE LOD Working at the center. (Shows thesauri only, not yet CONA/Museum data) ONTOTEXT SCOPE OF WORK Semantic/ontology development: http://vocab.getty.edu/ontology Contributed to ISO 25964 ontology (latest standard on thesauri). Provided implementation experience, suggestions and fixes Complete mapping specification Help implement R2RML scripts working off Getty's Oracle database, contribution to Perl implementation (RDB2RDF), R2RML extension (rrx:languageColumn) Work with a wide External Reviewers group (people from OCLC, Europeana, ISO 25964 working group, etc) GraphDB (OWLIM) semantic repository. Enterprise Edition (clustered for high- availability) Semantic application development (customized Forest user interface) and tech consulting SPARQL 1.1 compliant endpoint: http://vocab.getty.edu/sparql Comprehensive documentation (100 pages): http://vocab.getty.edu/doc Lots of sample queries, including charts, geographic queries, etc Per-entity export files, explicit/total data dumps.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Country Paper – the United Republic of Tanzania (Draft)
    Nutrition Country Paper – The United Republic of Tanzania (Draft) CAADP Agriculture Nutrition Capacity Development Workshops February 2013 DRAFT Methodology and general sources used to produce this document This document has been prepared through a joint effort by technical staff from the Tanzania Food and Nutrition Center, The Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperative, The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, The Ministry of Education and Vocational Training, The Ministry of Community Development, Gender and Children, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the , UN REACH and other stakeholders using the sources listed below. This document presents an overview of the current nutritional situation in Tanzania as well as the role of nutrition within the country context of food security and agriculture, including strategy, policies and main programs. The purpose of this document is to increase knowledge on the nutrition situation, technical resources, sector programs and policies and identify the challenges and opportunities to scale up nutrition in agricultural and food security strategies and programs. Note this document is presented as a draft, comments and corrections are welcomed. Sources Information Internet Link FAO Nutrition Country Profiles http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/nutrition/profiles_by_country_en.stm FAO Country profiles http://www.fao.org/countries/ FAO STAT country profiles http://faostat.fao.org/site/666/default.aspx UNICEF Nutrition Country Profiles http://www.childinfo.org/profiles_974.htm MICS:
    [Show full text]