DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Assessment Conservation Assessment for Four Species of the Genus Hemphillia Burrington Jumping-slug (Hemphillia burringtoni) Warty Jumping-slug (Hemphillia glandulosa) gu l (s- gn MipmuJe Hemphillia no l malonei a ) gu l (s- gn i PpmuJr ehHemphillia t na pantherina) Originally issued as Management Recommendations February 1998 Thomas E. Burke Revised October 2005 Mitch Wainwright Nancy Duncan USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................1 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR GENUS HEMPHILLIA................................................................. 3 Hemphillia burringtoni I. NATURAL HISTORY ..................................................................................................... 3 A. Taxonomic/Nomenclatural History .........................................................................3 B. Species Description................................................................................................. 4 1. Morphology ................................................................................................ 4 2. Reproductive Biology ................................................................................. 5 3. Ecology ....................................................................................................... 5 C. Range, Known Sites................................................................................................ 5 D. Habitat Characteristics and Species Abundance..................................................... 6 1. Habitat Characteristics ................................................................................ 6 2. Species Abundance ..................................................................................... 7 II. CURRENT SPECIES SITUATION ................................................................................ 8 A. Status History .........................................................................................................8 B. Major Habitat and Viability Considerations........................................................... 8 C. Threats to the Species ............................................................................................. 9 D. Distribution Relative to Land Allocations.............................................................. 9 Hemphillia glandulosa I. NATURAL HISTORY ................................................................................................... 10 A. Taxonomic/Nomenclatural History ...................................................................... 10 B. Species Description............................................................................................... 10 1. Morphology .............................................................................................. 10 2. Reproductive Biology ............................................................................... 11 3. Ecology ..................................................................................................... 11 C. Range, Known Sites.............................................................................................. 11 D. Habitat Characteristics and Species Abundance................................................... 12 1. Habitat Characteristics .............................................................................. 12 2. Species Abundance ................................................................................... 14 II. CURRENT SPECIES SITUATION .............................................................................. 14 A. Status History .......................................................................................................14 B. Major Habitat and Viability Considerations ......................................................... 15 C. Threats to the Species ........................................................................................... 15 D. Distribution Relative to Land Allocations............................................................ 15 Hemphillia malonei I. NATURAL HISTORY ................................................................................................... 16 A. Taxonomic/Nomenclatural History ...................................................................... 16 B. Species Description............................................................................................... 16 1. Morphology .............................................................................................. 16 2. Reproductive Biology ............................................................................... 17 3. Ecology ..................................................................................................... 18 C. Range, Known Sites.............................................................................................. 18 D. Habitat Characteristics and Species Abundance................................................... 19 1. Habitat Characteristics .............................................................................. 19 2. Species Abundance ................................................................................... 20 II. CURRENT SPECIES SITUATION .............................................................................. 21 A. Status History .......................................................................................................21 B. Major Habitat and Viability Considerations ......................................................... 21 C. Threats to the Species ........................................................................................... 22 D. Distribution n Relative to Land Allocations......................................................... 22 Hemphillia pantherina I. NATURAL HISTORY ................................................................................................... 23 A. Taxonomic/Nomenclatural History ...................................................................... 23 B. Species Description............................................................................................... 23 1. Morphology .............................................................................................. 23 2. Reproductive Biology ............................................................................... 23 3. Ecology ..................................................................................................... 23 C. Range, Known Sites.............................................................................................. 24 D. Habitat Characteristics and Species Abundance................................................... 24 1. Habitat Characteristics .............................................................................. 24 2. Species Abundance ................................................................................... 24 II. CURRENT SPECIES SITUATION .............................................................................. 24 A. Status History .......................................................................................................24 B. Major Habitat and Viability Considerations ......................................................... 25 C. Threats to the Species ........................................................................................... 25 D. Distribution Relative to Land Allocation ..............................................................25 III. MANAGEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................... 25 IV. HABITAT MANAGEMENT......................................................................................... 26 A. Lessons from History ............................................................................................ 26 B. Identification of Species Habitat Areas ................................................................ 26 C. Management Within Species Habitat Areas ......................................................... 27 D. Other Management Issues and Considerations ..................................................... 29 V. RESEARCH, INVENTORY, AND MONITORING OPPORTUNITIES ................. 29 A. Data Gaps and Information Needs ........................................................................ 29 B. Research Questions............................................................................................... 30 C. Monitoring Opportunities ..................................................................................... 30 VI. REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 32 Preface: Converting Survey and Manage Management Recommendations into Conservation Assessments Much of the content in this document was included in previously transmitted Management Recommendations developed for use with Survey and Manage Standards and Guidelines. With the removal of those Standards and Guidelines, the Management Recommendations have been reconfigured into Conservation Assessments to fit Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (SSSSP) objectives and language. Changes include: the removal of terminology specific to Survey and Manage Standards and Guidelines, the addition of Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center ranks for the species, and the addition of USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Special Status/Sensitive Species status and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Gabriel Chestnut ESA Petition
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE TO PROTECT THE SAN GABRIEL CHESTNUT SNAIL UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT © James Bailey CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Notice of Petition Ryan Zinke, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Greg Sheehan, Acting Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Paul Souza, Director Region 8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825 [email protected] Petitioner The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1.3 million members and supporters dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places. http://www.biologicaldiversity.org Failure to grant the requested petition will adversely affect the aesthetic, recreational, commercial, research, and scientific interests of the petitioning organization’s members and the people of the United States. Morally, aesthetically, recreationally, and commercially, the public shows increasing concern for wild ecosystems and for biodiversity in general. 1 November 13, 2017 Dear Mr. Zinke: Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. §424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity and Tierra Curry hereby formally petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”, “the Service”) to list the San Gabriel chestnut snail (Glyptostoma gabrielense) as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act and to designate critical habitat concurrently with listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Clam Dissection Guideline
    Clam Dissection Guideline BACKGROUND: Clams are bivalves, meaning that they have shells consisting of two halves, or valves. The valves are joined at the top, and the adductor muscles on each side hold the shell closed. If the adductor muscles are relaxed, the shell is pulled open by ligaments located on each side of the umbo. The clam's foot is used to dig down into the sand, and a pair of long incurrent and excurrent siphons that extrude from the clam's mantle out the side of the shell reach up to the water above (only the exit points for the siphons are shown). Clams are filter feeders. Water and food particles are drawn in through one siphon to the gills where tiny, hair-like cilia move the water, and the food is caught in mucus on the gills. From there, the food-mucus mixture is transported along a groove to the palps (mouth flaps) which push it into the clam's mouth. The second siphon carries away the water. The gills also draw oxygen from the water flow. The mantle, a thin membrane surrounding the body of the clam, secretes the shell. The oldest part of the clam shell is the umbo, and it is from the hinge area that the clam extends as it grows. I. Purpose: The purpose of this lab is to identify the internal and external structures of a mollusk by dissecting a clam. II. Materials: 2 pairs of safety goggles 1 paper towel 2 pairs of gloves 1 pair of scissors 1 preserved clam 2 pairs of forceps 1 dissecting tray 2 probes III.
    [Show full text]
  • (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Onchidiidae) from Iran, Persian Gulf
    Zootaxa 4758 (3): 501–531 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4758.3.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F2B0734-03E2-4D94-A72D-9E43A132D1DE Description of a new Peronia species (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Onchidiidae) from Iran, Persian Gulf FATEMEH MANIEI1,3, MARIANNE ESPELAND1, MOHAMMAD MOVAHEDI2 & HEIKE WÄGELE1 1Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute (IFRO), 1588733111, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 3Corresponding author Abstract Peronia J. Fleming, 1822 is an eupulmonate slug genus with a wide distribution in the Indo-Pacific Ocean. Currently, nine species are considered as valid. However, molecular data indicate cryptic speciation and more species involved. Here, we present results on a new species found in the Persian Gulf, a subtropical region with harsh conditions such as elevated salinity and high temperature compared to the Indian Ocean. Peronia persiae sp. nov. is described based on molecular, histological, anatomical, micro-computer tomography and scanning electron microscopy data. ABGD, GMYC and bPTP analyses based on 16S rDNA and cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences of Peronia confirm the delimitation of the new species. Moreover, our 14 specimens were carefully compared with available information of other described Peronia species. Peronia persiae sp. nov. is distinct in a combination of characters, including differences in the genital (ampulla, prostate, penial hooks, penial needle) and digestive systems (lack of pharyngeal wall teeth, tooth shape in radula, intestine of type II).
    [Show full text]
  • The Slugs of Bulgaria (Arionidae, Milacidae, Agriolimacidae
    POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT ZOOLOGII ANNALES ZOOLOGICI Tom 37 Warszawa, 20 X 1983 Nr 3 A n d rzej W ik t o r The slugs of Bulgaria (A rionidae , M ilacidae, Limacidae, Agriolimacidae — G astropoda , Stylommatophora) [With 118 text-figures and 31 maps] Abstract. All previously known Bulgarian slugs from the Arionidae, Milacidae, Limacidae and Agriolimacidae families have been discussed in this paper. It is based on many years of individual field research, examination of all accessible private and museum collections as well as on critical analysis of the published data. The taxa from families to species are sup­ plied with synonymy, descriptions of external morphology, anatomy, bionomics, distribution and all records from Bulgaria. It also includes the original key to all species. The illustrative material comprises 118 drawings, including 116 made by the author, and maps of localities on UTM grid. The occurrence of 37 slug species was ascertained, including 1 species (Tandonia pirinia- na) which is quite new for scientists. The occurrence of other 4 species known from publications could not bo established. Basing on the variety of slug fauna two zoogeographical limits were indicated. One separating the Stara Pianina Mountains from south-western massifs (Pirin, Rila, Rodopi, Vitosha. Mountains), the other running across the range of Stara Pianina in the^area of Shipka pass. INTRODUCTION Like other Balkan countries, Bulgaria is an area of Palearctic especially interesting in respect to malacofauna. So far little investigation has been carried out on molluscs of that country and very few papers on slugs (mostly contributions) were published. The papers by B a b o r (1898) and J u r in ić (1906) are the oldest ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Achatinellidae) 1
    Published online: 29 May 2015 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2014. Part I: 49 Articles. Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis & Scott E. Miller. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 116: 49 –51 (2015) Rediscovery of Auriculella pulchra Pease, 1868 (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Achatinellidae) 1 NORINe W. Y eUNg 2, D ANIel CHUNg 3 Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA; emails: [email protected], [email protected] DAvID R. S ISCHO Department of Land and Natural Resources, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Rm. 325, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813, USA; email: [email protected] KeNNetH A. H AYeS 2,3 Howard University, 415 College Street NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA; email: [email protected] Hawaii supports one of the world’s most spectacular land snail radiations and is a diversity hotspot (Solem 1983, 1984, Cowie 1996a, b). Unfortunately, much of the Hawaiian land snail fauna has been lost, with overall extinction rates as high as ~70% (Hayes et al ., unpubl. data). However, the recent rediscovery of an extinct species provides hope that all is not lost, yet continued habitat destruction, impacts of invasive species, and climate change, necessi - tate the immediate development and deployment of effective conservation strategies to save this biodiversity treasure before it vanishes entirely (Solem 1990, Rég nier et al . 2009). Achatinellidae Auriculella pulchra Pease 1868 Notable rediscovery Auriculella pulchra (Fig. 1) belongs in the Auriculellinae, a Hawaiian endemic land snail subfamily of the Achatinellidae with 32 species (Cowie et al . 1995). It was originally described from the island of O‘ahu in 1868 and was subsequently recorded throughout the Ko‘olau Mountain range.
    [Show full text]
  • Method of Dissecting Edible Snails of the Genus Cornu
    Med. Weter. 2019, 75 (10), 609-612 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.21521/mw.6300 609 Praca oryginalna Original paper Method of dissecting edible snails of the genus Cornu JERZY ZIĘTEK, MONIKA ZIOMEK*, ANNA WILCZYŃSKA Department of Epizoology and Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 30, 20-612 Lublin, Poland *Department of Food Hygiene of Animal Origin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland Received 22.05.2019 Accepted 15.06.2019 Ziętek J., Ziomek M., Wilczyńska A. Method of dissecting edible snails of the genus Cornu Summary Snails of the genus Cornu are farm-raised as edible molluscs. Dissection is one of the basic diagnostic tests available in the breeding of these animals, used to determine the cause of death or disease, and to collect material for further laboratory tests. The aim of this article was to present a method for the dissection of snails for veterinary use based on the experience gained from 200 mollusc dissections, and to present a short description of the anatomical structure of snails. The method described is characterized by its speed and simplicity. The observations made during the dissection, as presented in the article provide valuable diagnostic information for veterinarians responsible for care on snail farms. Keywords: Cornu aspersum aspersum, snail anatomy, snail dissection, edible snail In the past, interest in snails as part of veterinary Detailed laboratory tests and dissections are among practice was limited to their role as intermediate hosts the basic diagnostic tests performed in the breeding in the development cycles of parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distribution and Food Preferences of Arion Subfuscus (Draparnaud, 1805)
    Vol. 16(2): 61–67 ON THE DISTRIBUTION AND FOOD PREFERENCES OF ARION SUBFUSCUS (DRAPARNAUD, 1805) JAN KOZ£OWSKI Institute of Plant Protection, National Research Institute, W³adys³awa Wêgorka 20, 60-318 Poznañ, Poland (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: In recent years Arion subfuscus (Drap.) is increasingly often observed in agricultural crops. Its abun- dance and effect on winter oilseed rape crops were studied. Its abundance was found to be much lower than that of Deroceras reticulatum (O. F. Müll.). Preferences of A. subfuscus to oilseed rape and 19 other herbaceous plants were determined based on multiple choice tests in the laboratory. Indices of acceptance (A.I.), palat- ability (P.I.) and consumption (C.I.) were calculated for the studied plant species; accepted and not accepted plant species were identified. A. subfuscus was found to prefer seedlings of Brassica napus, while Chelidonium maius, Euphorbia helioscopia and Plantago lanceolata were not accepted. KEY WORDS: Arion subfuscus, abundance, oilseed rape seedlings, herbaceous plants, acceptance of plants INTRODUCTION Pulmonate slugs are seroius pests of plants culti- common (RIEDEL 1988, WIKTOR 2004). It lives in low- vated in Poland and in other parts of western and cen- land and montane forests, shrubs, on meadows, tral Europe (GLEN et al. 1993, MESCH 1996, FRANK montane glades and sometimes even in peat bogs. Re- 1998, MOENS &GLEN 2002, PORT &ESTER 2002, cently it has been observed to occur synanthropically KOZ£OWSKI 2003). The most important pest species in such habitats as ruins, parks, cemeteries, gardens include Deroceras reticulatum (O. F. Müller, 1774), and and margins of cultivated fields.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 10 MOLLUSCS 10.1 a Significant Space A
    PART file:///C:/DOCUME~1/ROBERT~1/Desktop/Z1010F~1/FINALS~1.HTM CHAPTER 10 MOLLUSCS 10.1 A Significant Space A. Evolved a fluid-filled space within the mesoderm, the coelom B. Efficient hydrostatic skeleton; room for networks of blood vessels, the alimentary canal, and associated organs. 10.2 Characteristics A. Phylum Mollusca 1. Contains nearly 75,000 living species and 35,000 fossil species. 2. They have a soft body. 3. They include chitons, tooth shells, snails, slugs, nudibranchs, sea butterflies, clams, mussels, oysters, squids, octopuses and nautiluses (Figure 10.1A-E). 4. Some may weigh 450 kg and some grow to 18 m long, but 80% are under 5 centimeters in size. 5. Shell collecting is a popular pastime. 6. Classes: Gastropoda (snails…), Bivalvia (clams, oysters…), Polyplacophora (chitons), Cephalopoda (squids, nautiluses, octopuses), Monoplacophora, Scaphopoda, Caudofoveata, and Solenogastres. B. Ecological Relationships 1. Molluscs are found from the tropics to the polar seas. 2. Most live in the sea as bottom feeders, burrowers, borers, grazers, carnivores, predators and filter feeders. 1. Fossil evidence indicates molluscs evolved in the sea; most have remained marine. 2. Some bivalves and gastropods moved to brackish and fresh water. 3. Only snails (gastropods) have successfully invaded the land; they are limited to moist, sheltered habitats with calcium in the soil. C. Economic Importance 1. Culturing of pearls and pearl buttons is an important industry. 2. Burrowing shipworms destroy wooden ships and wharves. 3. Snails and slugs are garden pests; some snails are intermediate hosts for parasites. D. Position in Animal Kingdom (see Inset, page 172) E.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY of OTINA OTIS, a PRIMITIVE MARINE PULMONATE by J. E. Morton Department of Zoology, Queen Mary College, University of London
    J. Mar. bioI.Ass. U.K. (1955) 34, II3-150 II3 Printed in Great Britain THE FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF OTINA OTIS, A PRIMITIVE MARINE PULMONATE By J. E. Morton Department of Zoology, Queen Mary College, University of London (Text-figs. 1-12) The family Otinidae is the smallest and probably the least known among the pulmonates. Thiele (1931) places it at the base of the Basommatophora, the more primitive order of the subclass Pulmonata, in the Stirps Actophila. It contains a single species, Otina otis Turton, with a geographical range con- fined to the coasts of the British Isles and north-west France. Its northern distribution reaches as far as the Firth of Clyde, according to Jeffreys (1869), and over the greater part of its British range it appears to follow fairly closely the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus, which here reaches its northern limit. Otina otis is a tiny snail, and its external form is limpet-like. The shell, which is well described by Jeffreys (1869), and also by Ellis (1926), measures up to 2' 5 mm in length, with a short apical visceral coil at the posterior end. It is dark chestnut brown in colour, and most resembles a minute Haliotis. A description of the ecology of Otina otis has already appeared, as portion of a study of the crevice-dwelling animals of the upper intertidal zone at Wembury (Morton, 1954). Otina is rather restricted in its mode of occurrence as regards both vertical tidal range and selection of substratum. It lives a short distance within the mouths of crevices between layers offoliaceous rocks, such as Dartmouth Slate at Wembury and Whitsands, and felsite at Kingsands, and in fissures between blocks of Staddon Grit at Rum Bay and volcanic rocks at Drake's Island.
    [Show full text]
  • (5 Classes) Polyplacophora – Many Plates on a Foot Cephalopoda – Head Foot Gastropoda – Stomach Scaphopoda – Tusk Shell Bivalvia – Hatchet Foot
    Policemen Phylum Censor Gals in Scant Mollusca Bikinis! (5 Classes) Polyplacophora – Many plates on a foot Cephalopoda – Head foot Gastropoda – Stomach Scaphopoda – Tusk shell Bivalvia – Hatchet foot foot Typical questions for Mollusca •How many of these specimens posses a radula? •Which ones are filter feeders? •Which have undergone torsion? Detorsion? •Name the main function of the mantle? •Name a class used for currency •Which specimens have lungs? (Just have think of which live on land vs. in water……) •Name the oldest part of a univalve shell? Bivalve? Answers…maybe • Gastropods, Cephalopoda, Mono-, A- & Polyplacophora • Bivalvia (Scaphopoda….have a captacula) • Gastropods Opisthobranchia (sea hares & sea slugs) and the land slugs of the Pulmonata • Mantle secretes the shell • Scaphopoda • Pulmonata – their name gives this away • Apex for Univalve, Umbo for bivalve but often the terms are used interchangeably Anus Gills in Mantle mantle cavity Radula Head in mouth Chitons radula, 8 plates Class Polyplacophora Tentacles (2) & arms are all derived from the gastropod foot Class Cephalopoda - Octopuses, Squid, Nautilus, Cuttlefish…beak, pen, ink sac, chromatophores, jet propulsion……….dissection. Subclass Prosobranchia Aquatic –marine. Generally having thick Apex pointed shells, spines, & many have opercula. Gastropoda WORDS TO KNOW: snails, conchs, torsion, coiling, radula, operculum & egg sac Subclass Pulmonata Aquatic – freshwater. Shells are thin, rounded, with no spines, ridges or opercula. Subclass Pulmonata Slug Detorsion… If something looks strange, chances are…. …….it is Subclass Opisthobranchia something from Class Gastropoda Nudibranch (…or your roommate!) Class Gastropoda Sinistral Dextral ‘POP’ Subclass Prosobranchia - Aquatic snails (“shells”) -Have gills Subclass Opisthobranchia - Marine - Have gills - Nudibranchs / Sea slugs / Sea hares - Mantle cavity & shell reduced or absent Subclass Pulmonata - Terrestrial Slugs and terrestrial snails - Have lungs Class Scaphopoda - “tusk shells” Wampum Indian currency.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]