Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 26 | Number 1 Article 8 1998 Judicial Efficiency: Is There a Vacancy Crisis Threatening the Nation's Judicial System? Panel Discussion Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Panel Discussion, Judicial Efficiency: Is There a Vacancy Crisis Threatening the Nation's Judicial System?, 26 Fordham Urb. L.J. 33 (1998). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol26/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 1 1998 Article 8 Judicial Efficiency: Is There a Vacancy Crisis Threatening the Nation’s Judicial System? Panel Discussion∗ ∗ Copyright c 1998 by the authors. Fordham Urban Law Journal is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Judicial Efficiency: Is There a Vacancy Crisis Threatening the Nation’s Judicial System? Panel Discussion Abstract A panel composed of Honorable John F. Keenan, Michael Armstrong, Otto Obermaier, Hon- orable Michael Schattman, and Stephan Kline discuss whether the vacancy rate in the judiciary threatens erosion of the quality of justice. The panelists discuss whether the problem involves the White House’s inability to work with the Senate Judiciary Committee, people of different persua- sions, to move judicial candidates along.