Case Studies in North East England and Tees Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Studies in North East England and Tees Valley CAN INSTITUTIONS ADAPT TO NEW MODELS OF ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE? Case studies in North East England and Tees Valley. Peter Morris June 2020 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies Newcastle University i Abstract This thesis draws lessons for economic governance from two case studies of a model of local development introduced by the UK government in 2010. Its temporal context is the decision of the coalition government to abolish the regionalism introduced by the Labour government in 1997/98 and replace it with a model of localism based on functional economic areas (FEAs). Its spatial context is North East England, where the two case studies have been conducted to illustrate how localism is working in practice as a governance system. The thesis studies the governance of devolution in the North East Combined Authority (NECA) and in Tees Valley as a political, economic and institutional issue, analysing the responses of local leaderships to the new model and its formal institutional arrangements. It finds that informal institutions in the shape of identity, socio-cultural values and political traditions and practices can exert a powerful influence on local leadership groups and hence the establishment and operations of new formal institutions. The thesis discusses the different approaches taken by the new formal institutions to development, and the resulting economic outcomes. It concludes that governments intending to devolve powers for economic purposes must take full account of regional and/or local circumstances, including the political. Trying to impose an economic governance model on an unwilling locality does not work, and a bottom-up approach should be adopted. Economically, it finds that at this stage, and with so many spatially blind factors affecting the regional economy, it is impossible to say whether the transition from regionalism to localism is having any economic effect, though early signs are largely disappointing. The thesis also examines the accountability and inclusiveness of the new governance and finds problematic issues in relation to both. It concludes with recommendations for institutional reform. In what is the quite recent and continuously evolving institutional landscape of localism in England, the thesis makes a significant addition to a still under-researched field. i Acknowledgements I must have been a difficult student, so I must first of all acknowledge the patience of my supervisors, Professor Danny MacKinnon and Dr Alistair Clark, in putting up with my over-confidence and occasional grumpiness and keeping me on the academic straight and narrow. I also thank staff in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences for the training they provided in research methods during the early stages of my study. This work could not have been carried out at all without the co-operation of the 43 people who agreed to be interviewed. All are busy people, and I am grateful for their time, but also what I believe was their frankness, without which the value of the work would have been very much diminished. They must remain anonymous, but they know who they are. Finally, I thank my family and friends, who had to put up with long periods when I was sitting in front of my computer or had my head buried in a book instead of participating in sociable activities. I also thank my great niece, Jemima Woodhouse, for using her digital skills to replicate the diagram of Hambleton’s framework for civic leadership, which is reproduced in Chapter 2. This has been a work of close personal interest to me. I spent my entire career observing my native North East England struggling in vain to lift its economic performance from the lower reaches of the UK league tables where it has languished for decades. I have worked in a variety of positions in all the region’s conurbations and want to see them and their hinterlands prosper. I would like to be able to offer a solution to their economic predicament but I can’t, and this thesis does not propose a panacea, though it does suggest ways of building a sense of common purpose, which is a necessary first step. This thesis is independent and funded by the author. ii Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ...................................................................................................... iii List of figures ........................................................................................................... viii List of tables ............................................................................................................ viii Acronyms .................................................................................................................. ix Introduction and methodology .................................................................. 1 1.1 The aims of the thesis ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 The wider devolution context: globalisation, regionalisation, localisation ........... 3 1.3 Key concepts ......................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1 Institutions ..................................................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Place and identity, agglomeration and dominance ...................................... 12 1.3.3 Leadership and accountability ..................................................................... 14 1.3.4 Path dependence ......................................................................................... 17 1.4 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 18 1.4.1 Philosophical approach ................................................................................ 21 1.4.2 The case studies ........................................................................................... 23 1.5 Methods of data collection and analysis ............................................................. 26 1.5.1 Documentary evidence ................................................................................ 27 iii 1.5.2 The interviews ............................................................................................. 29 1.5.3 Use of statistics ............................................................................................ 33 1.5.4 Ethical and reflexive considerations ............................................................ 33 1.6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 35 Literature Review: economic theories and political governance .............. 37 2.1 Theories of economic geography ........................................................................ 38 2.1.1 New economic geography ........................................................................... 38 2.1.2 Institutional economic geography ............................................................... 45 2.1.3 Evolutionary economic geography ............................................................... 46 2.2 Governance, the state and devolution................................................................ 49 2.2.1 The emerging role of governance ................................................................ 50 2.2.2 The continuing role of government ............................................................. 52 2.2.3 Economic governance and devolution in England ....................................... 53 2.2.4 Leadership, accountability and inclusion in local government ..................... 60 2.3 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 67 The context of North East England: identity, culture and politics ............. 69 3.1 North East England’s framework for place-based leadership ............................. 70 3.1.1 Socio-cultural and political framing ............................................................. 70 3.1.2 Economic framing: the economic consequences of social values ................ 81 3.1.3 Government framing ................................................................................... 89 3.1.4 Environmental framing ................................................................................ 96 3.2 North East England’s administrative geography ................................................. 99 3.2.1 North East and North of Tyne ...................................................................... 99 iv 3.2.2 Tees Valley ................................................................................................. 102 3.3 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 104 NECA: a failure of institutional adaptation ............................................ 106 4.1 From deal to no deal in 11 months ................................................................... 107 4.2 The role of the business leadership .................................................................. 115 4.3 The role of public professionals ........................................................................ 120 4.4 The Campaign for Real Devolution
Recommended publications
  • 'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
    Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Media Point Media Type
    Country Media Point Media Type Austria satzKONTOR Blog Austria A1 Telekom Austria AG Company/Organisation Austria Accedo Austria GmbH Company/Organisation Austria Agentur für Monopolverwaltung Company/Organisation Austria AGES – Agentur für Ernährungssicherheit Company/Organisation Austria AGGM – Austrian Gas Grid Management GmbHCompany/Organisation Austria Agrana AG Company/Organisation Austria Agrarmarkt Austria Company/Organisation Austria AHHV Verlags GmbH Company/Organisation Austria Aidshilfe Salzburg Company/Organisation Austria Air Liquide Company/Organisation Austria AIZ - Agrarisches Informationszentrum Company/Organisation Austria AKH – Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt WienCompany/Organisation Austria Albatros Media GmbH Company/Organisation Austria Albertina Company/Organisation Austria Alcatel Lucent Austria AG Company/Organisation Austria Allgemeine Baugesellschaft A. Porr AG Company/Organisation Austria Allianz Elementar Versicherungs-AG Company/Organisation Austria Alphaaffairs Kommunikationsberatung Company/Organisation Austria Alpine Bau Company/Organisation Austria Alstom Power Austria AG Company/Organisation Austria AMA - Agrarmarkt Austria Marketing Company/Organisation Austria Amnesty International Company/Organisation Austria AMS Arbeitsmarktservice – BundesgeschäftsstelleCompany/Organisation Austria AMS Burgenland Company/Organisation Austria AMS Kärnten Company/Organisation Austria AMS Niederösterreich Company/Organisation Austria AMS Oberösterreich Company/Organisation Austria AMS Salzburg Company/Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting out the Middleman – Political Actors Use of Disintermediated Communication Via Facebook During the UK General Election of 2017
    IPSA WORLD CONGRESS Cutting out the middleman – political actors use of disintermediated communication via Facebook during the UK General Election of 2017 Matt Walsh, Department of Journalism, Media and Performance, University of Northampton 7/1/2018 Abstract: Political actors are increasingly curating their own audiences via social media, communicating directly with their supporters and bypassing political reporters and commentators. From Donald Trump to Jeremy Corbyn, politicians are finding that they can rouse supporters without recourse to a traditional media that tries to balance or mediate their message through its own filters. This paper will analyse the use of Facebook by political actors to communicate with voters during the UK’s snap election of 2017. Taking a quantitative approach, it will identify the key strategic themes and tactical approaches taken by the major parties and the party leaders over the course of the short campaign. It will consider to what extent the unexpected election and its surprising result were as a result of the motivation of voters through Facebook communities of interest. ANALYSIS OF FACEBOOK USE IN UK GENERAL ELECTION 2017 Introduction When Prime Minister Theresa May stepped into Downing Street on the morning of the 18th of April 2017, few people knew she was about to announce a snap General Election. Even The Times’s well-connected political columnist, and Conservative member of the House of Lords, Daniel Finkelstein, a man so close to her predecessor that he used to contribute to drafts of David Cameron’s conference speeches and is, reportedly, helping write the former Prime Minister’s memoirs, tweeted: ` Followed shortly afterwards by a rueful admission that predicting things is hard: Having returned from a walking holiday in Snowdonia convinced that she had an opportunity to secure her own mandate as Prime Minister, Theresa May caught not only her rivals on the hop but also her allies (Rayner, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Document for London Assembly (Mayor's
    MINUTES Meeting: London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 17 December 2020 Time: 10.00 am Place: Virtual Meeting Copies of the minutes may be found at: www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/whole-assembly Present: Navin Shah AM (Chair) Nicky Gavron AM Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman) Susan Hall AM Jennette Arnold OBE AM David Kurten AM Gareth Bacon AM MP Joanne McCartney AM Shaun Bailey AM Dr Alison Moore AM Siân Berry AM Steve O'Connell AM Andrew Boff AM Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM Léonie Cooper AM Keith Prince AM Unmesh Desai AM Murad Qureshi AM Tony Devenish AM Caroline Russell AM Andrew Dismore AM Dr Onkar Sahota AM Len Duvall AM Peter Whittle AM Florence Eshalomi AM MP City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk v1 2015 Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 17 December 2020 1 Apologies for Absence and Chair's Announcements (Item 1) 1.1 The Chair explained that the meeting was being held on a virtual basis, in accordance with Government regulations, and Assembly Members were participating remotely. 1.2 The Clerk read the roll-call of Assembly Members. There were no apologies for absence. 1.3 The Chair provided an update on recent Assembly activity, including: the Police and Crime Committee’s letter to the Metropolitan Police Service to ensure a plan is in place to support victims of domestic abuse over the Christmas period; the Economy Committee’s examination of the changing way in which Londoners were working could impact on the city’s commercial centres; the Environment Committee’s response to the Supreme Court Judgment on Heathrow Airport following its ruling for the expansion of the airport; the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning Committee’s questioning of the London Fire Brigade and the Deputy Mayor for Fire and Resilience on the status of the Brigade’s transformation plans; and the Budget and Performance Committee’s questioning of the Deputy Mayor and TfL Commissioner on the TfL budget for 2021-22.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Modern Germany 1800–2000 for Lars, Marie-Isabel, Paula, and Philip-David a History of Modern Germany 1800–2000
    A History of Modern Germany 1800–2000 For Lars, Marie-Isabel, Paula, and Philip-David A History of Modern Germany 1800–2000 Martin Kitchen © 2006 by Martin Kitchen BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Martin Kitchen to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1 2006 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kitchen, Martin. A history of modern Germany, 1800–2000 / Martin Kitchen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-0040-3 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4051-0040-0 (alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-0041-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4051-0041-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Germany—History—1789–1900. 2. Germany—History—20th century. I. Title. DD203.K58 2006 943.08—dc22 2005006165 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 10 on 13 pt Sabon by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in India by Replika Press The publisher’s policy is to use permanent paper from mills that operate a sustainable forestry policy, and which has been manufactured from pulp processed using acid-free and elementary chlorine-free practices.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Public Relations and Economic
    Public Document Pack Public Relations and Economic Development Sub (Policy & Resources) Committee Date: TUESDAY, 2 JULY 2019 Time: 3.00 pm Venue: COMMITTEE ROOMS Members: Deputy Catherine McGuinness (Chairman) Simon Duckworth (Deputy Chairman) Deputy Keith Bottomley Tijs Broeke Dominic Christian Karina Dostalova Anne Fairweather Alderman Prem Goyal Christopher Hayward Deputy Jamie Ingham Clark Deputy Edward Lord Andrew Mayer Jeremy Mayhew Alderman William Russell Deputy Tom Sleigh Sir Michael Snyder James Tumbridge Alderman Sir David Wootton Enquiries: Emma Cunnington [email protected] John Barradell Town Clerk and Chief Executive AGENDA Part 1 - Public Agenda 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. MEMBERS' DECLARATIONS UNDER THE CODE OF CONDUCT IN RESPECT OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 3. MINUTES To agree the public minutes and summary of the meeting held on 11 June 2019. For Decision (Pages 1 - 6) 4. OUTSTANDING ACTIONS Report of the Town Clerk. For Information (Pages 7 - 8) 5. INNOVATION & GROWTH (IG) UPDATE Report of the Director of Innovation & Growth. For Information (Pages 9 - 12) 6. CORPORATE AFFAIRS UPDATE Report of the Director of Communications. For Information (Pages 13 - 18) 7. PARLIAMENTARY TEAM UPDATE Report of the Remembrancer. For Information (Pages 19 - 24) 8. 2019/20 MAYORAL PROGRAMME - ALDERMAN WILLIAM RUSSELL (SUBJECT TO ELECTION) Joint report of the Executive Director of Mansion House & Central Criminal Court, Director of Innovation & Growth, Assistant Town Clerk & Director of Major Projects, Director of Community & Children’s Services. For Information (Pages 25 - 30) 9. THE UK COALITION FOR DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE - PROPOSAL Joint report of the Director of Innovation & Growth and the Director of Community & Children’s Services.
    [Show full text]