MINUTES

Meeting: London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 17 December 2020 Time: 10.00 am Place: Virtual Meeting

Copies of the minutes may be found at: www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/whole-assembly

Present:

Navin Shah AM (Chair) Nicky Gavron AM

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman) Susan Hall AM

Jennette Arnold OBE AM David Kurten AM

Gareth Bacon AM MP Joanne McCartney AM

Shaun Bailey AM Dr Alison Moore AM

Siân Berry AM Steve O'Connell AM

Andrew Boff AM Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM

Léonie Cooper AM Keith Prince AM

Unmesh Desai AM Murad Qureshi AM

Tony Devenish AM Caroline Russell AM

Andrew Dismore AM Dr Onkar Sahota AM

Len Duvall AM Peter Whittle AM

Florence Eshalomi AM MP

City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk v1 2015 Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 17 December 2020

1 Apologies for Absence and Chair's Announcements (Item 1)

1.1 The Chair explained that the meeting was being held on a virtual basis, in accordance with Government regulations, and Assembly Members were participating remotely.

1.2 The Clerk read the roll-call of Assembly Members. There were no apologies for absence.

1.3 The Chair provided an update on recent Assembly activity, including: the Police and Crime Committee’s letter to the Metropolitan Police Service to ensure a plan is in place to support victims of domestic abuse over the Christmas period; the Economy Committee’s examination of the changing way in which Londoners were working could impact on the city’s commercial centres; the Environment Committee’s response to the Supreme Court Judgment on Heathrow Airport following its ruling for the expansion of the airport; the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning Committee’s questioning of the London Fire Brigade and the Deputy Mayor for Fire and Resilience on the status of the Brigade’s transformation plans; and the Budget and Performance Committee’s questioning of the Deputy Mayor and TfL Commissioner on the TfL budget for 2021-22. The Chair concluded with season’s greetings to all Londoners on behalf of the London Assembly.

2 Declarations of Interests (Item 2)

2.1 Resolved:

That the list of offices held by Assembly Members, as set out in the table at Agenda Item 2, be noted as disclosable pecuniary interests.

3 Mayor's Report (Item 3)

3.1 The Assembly noted the Mayor’s Report covering the period from 6 November to 3 December 2020.

3.2 In accordance with Standing Order 5.4A, the Mayor gave an oral update on matters occurring since the publication of his report. The record of the oral update is attached at Appendix 1.

4 Questions to the Mayor (Item 4)

4.1 The record of the discussion with the Mayor, including oral answers given by the Mayor to Members’ questions, is attached as Appendix 2.

2

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 17 December 2020

4.2 The written answers to those questions not asked or unanswered during the meeting is attached as Appendix 3.

4.3 The Deputy Chairman assumed the Chair from 10.26am to 10.31am for the duration of question 2020/4543.

4.4 During the course of the question and answer session the Chair proposed, and it was agreed, that Standing Order 2.9B be suspended to extend the meeting in order to allow the remaining questions on the priority order paper to be put to the Mayor and for the remaining items of business on the agenda to be considered.

4.5 At the conclusion of the question and answer session, the Assembly agreed the motion set out on the agenda in the name of the Chair, namely:

“That the Assembly notes the answers to the questions asked.”

5 Delegation to the Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee (Item 5)

5.1 Resolved:

That in relation to urgent matters only, a general delegation of authority in respect of the Assembly’s powers and functions (apart from those that cannot under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 be delegated) to the Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee, in consultation with the Deputy Chairman of that Committee, party Group Leaders, Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM and any relevant committee Chair(s) be agreed, from 17 December 2020 to the May 2021 GLA elections.

6 Future Meetings of the London Assembly (Item 6)

6.1 Resolved:

That written answers be accepted to all questions submitted to the 25 February 2021 London Assembly (Mayor’s Question Time) meeting under the Mayor’s Question Time procedure, in order to devote time to discussion of the Mayor’s Final Draft Consolidated Budget 2021/22.

3

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 17 December 2020

7 Date of Next Meeting (Item 7)

7.1 The next meeting of the London Assembly would be the Mayor’s Question Time meeting which was scheduled to take place at 10.00am on 21 January 2021as a virtual meeting.

8 Any Other Business the Chair Considers Urgent (Item 8)

8.1 There were no items of urgent business.

9 Close of Meeting

9.1 The meeting ended at 12.58pm.

Chair Date

Contact Officer: Fiona Bywaters Committee Services Manager GLA Secretariat, City Hall The Queen’s Walk, London, SE1 2AA Telephone: 020 7983 4425 Email: [email protected]

4

Appendix 1

Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 17 December 2020

Transcript of Item 3 – Oral update to the Mayor’s Report

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Good morning to you and to all Members of the Assembly.

Since the last Mayor’s Question Time, there have been some major developments in our fight against COVID-19. The Government has decided to move London into tier 3. I know this is incredibly disappointing for our businesses, particularly in hospitality, culture, leisure and retail, which have suffered so much already this year. However, it is clear that the virus is accelerating in the wrong direction once again across our city and that the lives of Londoners are at risk. It would be such a tragedy to lose even more people to this terrible disease when a vaccine is now being rolled out.

We know from bitter experience that when cases start to rise quickly, it is much better to act early rather than too late. This is how we can avoid even tougher restrictions for longer further down the road. The worst thing for London’s businesses and our economy would be for yet another lockdown in the new year. That is why I am urging Londoners to follow very closely the tier 3 rules that the Government has put in place and to be very careful over the Christmas period so that we can drive down infection rates as much as possible. I do not want our city to be in tier 3 for a day longer than is necessary because I am hugely concerned about the negative impact that the additional restrictions will have on jobs and many businesses that are already struggling to stay afloat. I will continue to put pressure on the Government to provide much more support to the sectors of our economy that are being hit hardest such as hospitality, culture, leisure and retail.

Chair, there are now only 14 short days to go until we could potentially face a no-deal Brexit scenario, which would be absolutely devastating for jobs, businesses and livelihoods in our city as well as our security. The fact that it has been allowed to get to this point with this terrible uncertainty hanging over businesses and our police just as we are in the middle of dealing with this pandemic is a huge failure from a Government that seems to be putting party political interests ahead of the national interest. A no-deal outcome should simply not be an option. As Mayor, I will continue to stand up for London by calling on the Government to extend the transition period if a deal cannot be reached within the next few days. This would be the obvious, right and sensible thing to do so that we can ensure all our efforts are focused on tackling this pandemic, not planning for a damaging no-deal Brexit.

As we approach the new year, my twin top priorities as Mayor remain to do everything possible to keep Londoners safe and to support our city out of this economic crisis by implementing our detailed recovery and jobs plan to get our city back on its feet.

Thank you, Chair. If I do not get a chance later on, I want to wish you, all of the Assembly and all Londoners a very happy and safe Christmas and New Year.

I have also been asked for one oral update by Assembly Member Devenish and the oral update is on Hammersmith Bridge. The two Government-commissioned reports made recommendations to [the London Borough of] Hammersmith and Fulham, as the Bridge owners, on the necessary steps to potentially allow the Bridge to be reopened to pedestrians and cyclists. Since the October [2020] funding deal was agreed, Transport for London (TfL) has been progressing initial repair works to the Bridge. For example, this week contractors have been onsite to begin the removal of the pedestal casings and have been blast-cleaning to 1 Page 1 reveal the extent of the damage to the Bridge. These works have been agreed with Hammersmith and Fulham and the Department for Transport (DfT) as essential to inform the next stages of the repairs.

TfL has also developed plans for the subsequent stages of refurbishment and has produced a draft business case, which has been submitted to the DfT, setting out why further works must be progressed as soon as possible. TfL awaits the DfT’s response to this. In addition, TfL is on schedule to award the contract for a new temporary ferry service on 10 February 2021 with the intention that the new service will be operational by the spring. The two reports can be accessed from the taskforce material published by the DfT on a monthly basis.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you, Mr Mayor. Assembly Member Devenish, do you want to come back on what you have heard or shall we move on? =

Tony Devenish AM: Thank you very much. Mr Mayor, good morning. Will you publish the two engineering reports that Councillor Cowan of Hammersmith and Fulham is hiding from the public and open the Bridge for cyclists and pedestrians before school reopens in January [2021], please?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, as I said in my answer, the DfT has published this in the taskforce material it publishes. It is a DfT report, not ours. I am more than happy, if he does not have it, to speak to colleagues on the taskforce to make sure he is given the material that the DfT has published.

Tony Devenish AM: Mr Mayor, you are confused, I am afraid. This is a factual point, not an opinion. There are two engineering reports prepared by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and shared with TfL over the last two years that Hammersmith and Fulham is refusing to release to the public. It is those two reports, sir, that we need to see.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, the taskforce has all the material and the taskforce through the DfT is publishing all the material as and when. If the Member has a concern about the DfT and the Council not publishing reports, I suggest he takes it up with them.

Tony Devenish AM: Mr Mayor, you are the strategic London transport authority. It is so important to get these reports published so that we can get the Bridge reopened. What do you say to my constituents who will not have the Bridge reopened by the time schools reopen in January?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I would advise them to lobby the Government to release the funds required for the Bridge to be repaired and opened as soon as possible. We have made three separate bids to the Government to have the Bridge repaired and opened as soon as possible. The Government has rejected all three bids. The Council has explained that it cannot afford to repair the Bridge. Whatever means we are talking about, the end is the same, which is the Government having to pay for the cost of the Bridge to be repaired. I understand how frustrated local residents are. That is why it is even more incumbent on the Government to finally agree the funding required to get the Bridge reopened as soon as possible.

Tony Devenish AM: I will leave it there, Chair. It is very disappointing the Mayor does not want to take responsibility.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you, Assembly Member Devenish. Assembly Member Duvall, please go ahead.

Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much, Chair. 2 Page 2

Mr Mayor, from your report about the Brexit situation, can you confirm that there has been no further update or exchange between the Metropolitan Police [Service] (MPS) and the Government since the last Plenary meeting [11 December 2020] with you and the Commissioner [of Police of the Metropolis]? Do you think then that it is time to call for a disaggregation of this important European co-operation in tackling crime to be separated out from the wider agreements? At the moment, at this eleventh hour, it seems to me - I do not know if you agree - that this is a bit reckless and cavalier, not just for Londoners but with tackling crime across the UK.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): In answer to the first part of your question, I am not aware of conversations between the MPS and the Government on the particular issue you raised.

In relation to our security - and, by the way, Europe’s security as well - what I would hope is that our Government and the European Union (EU) would have a sensible conversation separate from the important negotiations taking place. Unfortunately, the bad news is that the phrase that is being used is, “Either everything is agreed or nothing is agreed”. The reason why that is unwise is because we are talking about the security of our citizens in the United Kingdom (UK) and across Europe.

I will give you some examples: checking passenger lists of potentially dangerous people, shared wanted lists across the whole of Europe, sharing fingerprints, sharing DNA, simple things like if we want to extradite somebody speedily from Europe and vice versa, the access to Europol and Prüm [Convention]. All these things are things that benefit all the citizens of the EU and the UK.

That is why my plea to the Government is that if it is the case that a deal cannot be reached by 31 December [2020] and the transition period comes to an end, rather than dogma and ideology leading to an unsafe Britain, an unsafe UK and an unsafe Europe, let us extend the transition so that we can have these provisions in place and that security and co-operation in place and then do a deal.

I make this point respectfully. I know from personal experience that a huge amount of our bandwidth has been taken up with COVID and I know also that a huge amount of the bandwidth of the Government has been taken up with COVID. Why limit the amount of bandwidth on COVID with negotiations with the EU and with the consequences of no deal? It does not make sense.

Len Duvall AM: Thank you.

3 Page 3 This page is intentionally left blank

Page 4 Owner StructureType LatestGI LatestPI BCI Average BCI Critical AverageRating CriticalRating TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 24/06/2019 02/06/2017 82.8 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 20/10/2016 13/06/2018 90.86 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 04/12/2013 88.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2020 24/04/2016 80.23 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/02/2020 08/01/2016 88.81 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 14/11/2019 81.07 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/11/2019 18/03/2016 75.52 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 18/07/2019 01/04/2016 89.82 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 09/10/2017 20/11/2019 80.14 74.52 Good Fair Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/08/2017 04/09/2019 87.46 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 20/08/2019 22/06/2017 79.29 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 22/08/2019 04/07/2017 73.45 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 29/09/2019 18/07/2015 67.91 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/10/2018 11/03/2020 86.02 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 29/09/2019 10/08/2017 80.71 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/08/2017 12/07/2020 90.15 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/08/2017 12/07/2020 86.14 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/10/2019 26/01/2016 87.39 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/08/2020 15/11/2018 69.06 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 22/05/2019 07/04/2017 77.65 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 10/06/2015 07/04/2017 89.1 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2017 20/09/2019 64.63 50.32 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/11/2020 22/05/2017 79.5 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 22/05/2019 07/04/2017 77.84 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/08/2020 11/04/2014 92.72 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2017 16/06/2015 95.32 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 23/10/2018 11/04/2014 72.08 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2017 14/05/2008 94.39 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 22/05/2019 14/05/2015 77.66 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/06/2016 06/03/2015 60.92 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/07/2015 12/09/2017 80.58 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/07/2015 10/07/2017 87.75 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/08/2017 09/04/2019 81.46 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Mast 16/12/2015 05/10/2009 66.54 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/08/2017 10/12/2019 68.01 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/05/2019 16/09/2017 81.04 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/08/2017 10/12/2019 73.33 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2017 23/10/2019 78.64 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/09/2020 26/07/2013 82.61 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/10/2019 10/07/2017 74.07 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 20/08/2019 04/07/2017 66.81 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2017 25/09/2019 70.13 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/10/2018 31/07/2013 75.4 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 26/11/2014 25/09/2015 79.75 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 29/06/2012 15/09/2015 81.98 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 14/11/2018 15/06/2016 88.51 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/01/2017 10/05/2018 93.53 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/11/2018 23/06/2020 81.46 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 10/11/2017 05/09/2013 83.51 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 10/11/2017 05/09/2013 87.76 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 26/11/2014 03/05/2016 75.08 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/04/2016 29/04/2014 92.86 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 21/10/2020 29/07/2016 77.01 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/04/2016 12/01/2010 86.73 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/04/2016 02/02/2011 87.45 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2017 19/08/2015 84.34 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/07/2017 19/08/2015 85.42 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/11/2018 19/08/2015 88.83 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 08/04/2016 81.38 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 18/09/2015 87.22 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2017 18/08/2015 81.98 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/11/2018 31/05/2012 89.92 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/04/2016 29/07/2009 93.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/11/2018 28/04/2016 91.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 21/10/2020 13/10/2016 81.52 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 18/06/2012 93.67 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 31/07/2018 06/09/2012 85.91 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 16/12/2009 89.7 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 31/07/2018 11/08/2009 95.76 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 17/01/2017 86.71 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 31/07/2018 23/08/2016 91.91 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 26/11/2010 84.15 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 13/07/2016 93.05 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 31/07/2018 29/11/2016 87.99 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/03/2020 06/04/2016 78.2 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/11/2018 09/02/2010 91.96 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/11/2018 28/01/2010 91.97 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 5 TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/10/2017 15/05/2019 88.87 65.32 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 05/06/2015 88.39 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/11/2018 21/12/2009 92.59 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/11/2018 09/05/2016 89.07 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/05/2016 01/04/2020 90.79 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 02/09/2014 89.25 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 21/10/2020 05/08/2016 81.21 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 16/01/2010 93.42 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/04/2019 30/05/2017 72.63 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/04/2016 09/07/2012 87.33 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/04/2019 16/09/2015 80.02 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 06/04/2018 12/05/2016 65.52 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 25/09/2020 18/05/2018 66.93 58 Fair Poor TfL - LUL Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/08/2018 01/05/2014 77.78 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/04/2018 27/10/2020 79.71 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/04/2018 28/10/2020 76.62 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/04/2019 27/07/2017 80.43 22.12 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2017 11/09/2019 56.71 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/05/2019 25/07/2017 74.75 28.08 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 06/04/2018 12/05/2016 74.53 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/05/2019 27/07/2017 79.22 0 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/09/2020 12/04/2016 74.5 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/04/2018 29/10/2020 79.91 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/11/2017 03/09/2015 88.05 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 26/06/2019 03/09/2015 76.98 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 22/05/2019 14/09/2017 82.24 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/08/2018 19/10/2020 80.03 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/08/2018 28/05/2020 83.4 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 27/06/2017 26/02/2020 65.24 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 10/07/2015 15/03/2019 90.77 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 08/09/2016 01/03/2019 81.06 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/07/2016 28/06/2019 85.74 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 22/05/2019 27/07/2015 84.58 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 22/05/2019 27/07/2015 82.31 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 09/05/2017 79.59 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/08/2018 05/07/2016 90.58 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/08/2018 05/07/2016 82.43 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/07/2014 08/05/2017 78.32 74.52 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 09/05/2017 80.96 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/07/2014 29/06/2017 79.4 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/08/2018 22/06/2016 81.58 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 22/05/2019 09/09/2017 79.99 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/08/2019 23/02/2016 82.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/10/2018 03/05/2020 78.43 28.08 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/03/2017 20/05/2008 93.68 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 10/03/2017 84.15 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2017 06/08/2015 85.5 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 10/03/2017 87.61 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2019 24/05/2017 79.21 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 29/08/2012 86.62 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/03/2017 23/01/2009 93.61 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/04/2019 02/07/2015 91.25 74.52 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 27/06/2017 30/01/2020 74.81 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 07/01/2016 93.21 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 01/04/2009 88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 16/06/2015 87.6 81 Good Good Highways Agency Gantry 06/06/2011 93.08 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/04/2019 10/07/2015 80.69 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 04/10/2016 13/04/2019 83.03 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/08/2017 25/04/2019 69.62 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/11/2018 21/10/2009 92.26 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/11/2018 11/03/2020 89.24 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 05/10/2017 18/10/2019 81.7 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 05/10/2017 11/05/2015 85.25 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/04/2017 13/06/2019 83.48 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/04/2017 30/10/2019 74.83 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2020 17/07/2009 90.97 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/04/2013 12/05/2018 81.62 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 06/10/2015 12/05/2018 83.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/06/2016 11/03/2019 92.34 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2020 18/05/2012 84.76 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/01/2019 18/05/2012 75.98 81 Fair Good Local Authority Chamber 25/08/2016 08/04/2009 96.33 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 26/08/2016 10/10/2018 90.53 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/01/2019 09/08/2016 92.68 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2020 15/07/2009 88.08 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/07/2018 20/03/2015 90.64 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2016 13/06/2008 88.91 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2016 11/06/2008 91.55 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/01/2019 09/09/2020 89.12 78.88 Good Fair

Page 6 TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 27/04/2016 12/03/2019 90.84 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/06/2018 14/07/2009 97.48 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/08/2018 26/09/2019 90.05 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2019 20/08/2014 87.87 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/06/2020 10/08/2016 80.91 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2016 17/05/2012 80.14 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/12/2015 03/10/2017 88.23 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 16/06/2020 18/08/2014 80.62 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 12/06/2019 19/11/2015 89.17 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/06/2019 08/01/2017 78.98 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/06/2019 08/01/2017 69.09 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/02/2020 21/06/2014 92.17 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/06/2020 26/09/2018 78.99 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 15/06/2020 13/12/2016 82.47 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/06/2020 01/07/2016 77.86 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 24/10/2018 05/07/2016 96.89 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/07/2016 21/05/2019 77.74 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2016 06/03/2019 83.06 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/08/2019 14/01/2016 87.92 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/09/2020 28/05/2009 89.43 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/06/2016 09/03/2019 85.82 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 18/04/2016 06/03/2019 94.1 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 15/06/2020 15/05/2012 77.61 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/06/2016 30/04/2008 83.12 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 28/06/2016 12/06/2019 78.78 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Retaining Wall) 12/06/2019 18/12/2015 77.62 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/04/2017 12/06/2019 81.75 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/09/2018 12/11/2014 80.88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/04/2017 12/06/2019 77.21 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/04/2017 09/04/2013 95.18 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2020 11/08/2016 85.05 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/04/2017 31/07/2019 80.06 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/04/2017 09/04/2013 85.88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/06/2020 18/10/2016 86.99 39.52 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 26/10/2018 25/11/2016 87.06 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 09/09/2020 89.85 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/01/2019 14/05/2014 82.83 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/08/2017 28/08/2013 97.67 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 08/09/2016 09/05/2018 81.18 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/11/2020 09/12/2016 70.03 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/11/2020 16/09/2016 82.95 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 25/10/2018 20/05/2020 71.03 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/03/2016 13/03/2020 89.58 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 25/03/2015 81.51 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 23/05/2017 77.4 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/11/2014 24/05/2017 84.06 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 25/05/2017 82.25 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 20/07/2010 86.05 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/10/2018 15/11/2011 86.56 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/11/2020 09/07/2018 79.1 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 09/12/2016 97.61 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2019 18/10/2017 79.27 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/09/2016 02/05/2019 77.96 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/09/2016 02/05/2019 76.01 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/10/2018 24/04/2016 82.59 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/03/2020 21/01/2018 77.88 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/09/2018 03/09/2015 80.96 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 25/09/2020 14/10/2016 77.19 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 26/06/2019 19/08/2015 79.28 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/11/2018 20/02/2020 86.26 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 28/09/2018 10/05/2009 93.06 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/05/2016 14/10/2020 91.99 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 26/06/2019 16/08/2015 74.15 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 08/12/2015 93.75 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/08/2018 20/09/2016 85.2 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 07/10/2015 87.78 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 29/08/2018 19/07/2014 93.53 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 29/08/2018 11/10/2014 84.46 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 29/08/2018 30/09/2020 79.14 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 23/08/2016 91.2 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/01/2019 20/02/2020 83.34 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/01/2019 28/04/2016 85.65 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/11/2017 30/09/2019 76.67 28.08 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/03/2020 02/02/2018 91.45 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 29/08/2018 19/09/2016 94.18 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/04/2019 18/06/2015 81.94 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 29/08/2018 10/08/2016 84.77 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 25/10/2010 95.78 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 12/05/2015 90.87 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/12/2015 29/05/2018 84.43 100 Good Very Good

Page 7 TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/09/2020 23/05/2016 85.23 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 16/12/2015 83.58 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/06/2020 21/11/2016 77.01 81 Fair Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) 22/04/2013 11/11/2008 92.83 81 Very Good Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) 19/05/2011 22/04/2013 84.34 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/08/2017 08/09/2020 95.07 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/08/2017 22/04/2013 91.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/06/2019 11/12/2010 91.33 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 17/03/2017 88.7 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/07/2017 11/09/2013 88.58 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/02/2019 08/09/2020 79.27 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/04/2017 13/06/2019 93.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/01/2019 08/09/2020 86.17 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 15/06/2018 07/04/2009 89.27 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/09/2018 11/05/2012 92.54 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 05/09/2018 18/05/2012 97.65 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/06/2020 03/10/2016 78.97 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/11/2017 10/07/2013 94.96 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/05/2019 14/06/2014 90.17 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/11/2017 13/05/2019 92.06 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 29/08/2017 10/07/2013 88.68 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/05/2019 14/06/2014 81.42 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 19/11/2017 20/07/2008 88.05 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 02/06/2017 23/02/2020 82.23 28.08 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/04/2014 06/07/2016 89.92 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 07/04/2014 27/11/2012 86.35 55.48 Good Poor TfL - LUL Retaining Wall 07/04/2014 11/10/2012 78.46 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 11/04/2014 09/08/2016 98.1 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/10/2019 13/09/2015 71.75 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 10/11/2017 22/05/2015 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/04/2017 18/09/2013 87.07 100 Good Very Good TfL - LUL Retaining Wall 27/09/2012 30/04/2014 77.52 100 Fair Very Good TfL - LUL Retaining Wall 04/06/2014 17/09/2007 91.69 31 Very Good Very Poor Local Authority Subway 11/07/2012 16/01/2009 92.27 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/04/2017 28/08/2015 96 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 16/10/2015 86.11 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/06/2016 15/10/2012 88.17 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2016 23/10/2014 94.75 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 25/07/2019 09/11/2016 77.17 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/10/2016 10/12/2013 87.25 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/12/2019 09/08/2017 80.11 28.08 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/12/2019 28/08/2015 83.59 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Bridge) 16/10/2018 23/08/2016 79.67 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/09/2019 12/10/2016 91.55 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 14/04/2015 87.44 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/04/2014 09/08/2016 94.17 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/09/2017 08/02/2013 85.8 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 06/07/2020 98.09 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 18/09/2018 09/08/2016 92.74 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) 07/06/2016 05/04/2012 95.16 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 18/07/2013 88.16 100 Good Very Good Local Authority Subway 12/06/2009 15/05/2007 98.95 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 13/11/2011 89.24 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 03/07/2017 26/11/2015 76.61 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 27/01/2016 02/06/2017 96.78 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/06/2017 01/12/2008 90.45 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 13/06/2019 17/08/2009 93.76 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 29/03/2018 27/07/2015 70.51 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/10/2017 30/05/2019 72.94 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/07/2017 13/06/2019 88.28 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 22/02/2015 85.53 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/10/2019 14/09/2017 68 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 10/08/2017 81.85 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 14/02/2019 16/02/2015 79.7 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/01/2019 27/08/2014 92.37 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/09/2020 27/08/2014 93.8 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/01/2019 08/09/2020 84.26 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/09/2020 16/08/2016 95.09 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/06/2007 24/03/2017 78.76 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 30/10/2019 17/03/2009 86.66 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2015 22/12/2017 87.04 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2017 11/11/2015 91.76 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 14/02/2011 90.7 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 12/11/2015 88.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 16/05/2016 69.36 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) 08/09/2020 27/08/2014 92.99 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2017 18/11/2015 87.47 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/03/2016 20/02/2020 89.68 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/03/2016 05/10/2020 93.66 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/12/2015 06/10/2020 94.36 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2018 18/06/2016 87.37 78.88 Good Fair

Page 8 TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/03/2016 08/08/2018 82.12 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 13/09/2018 78.1 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/03/2020 08/08/2018 78.62 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/04/2019 05/04/2017 87.13 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/05/2016 21/03/2019 93.45 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/03/2020 27/01/2017 91.42 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/07/2016 17/04/2019 84.63 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/11/2018 18/07/2016 80.51 39.52 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/03/2020 27/01/2017 85.65 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/08/2017 21/02/2016 65.27 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/04/2019 06/08/2017 66.51 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/08/2020 21/12/2016 81.18 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 14/11/2014 87.95 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 25/05/2011 88.47 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 15/11/2013 82.11 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 22/08/2014 84.06 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 27/10/2016 86.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 18/06/2020 30/01/2018 78.94 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2018 31/03/2017 80.24 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2018 06/06/2020 75.47 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 04/04/2016 28/06/2018 90.02 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 01/04/2009 87.56 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/06/2020 25/11/2016 89.11 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2016 22/06/2020 81.63 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2016 28/06/2018 69.05 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 31/03/2017 82.07 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 03/11/2016 85.04 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 01/04/2009 90.16 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 04/04/2016 22/06/2020 91.64 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 05/07/2018 09/06/2020 86.96 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 02/08/2018 05/06/2014 84.43 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/08/2018 17/07/2014 83.27 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/08/2018 05/06/2014 78.88 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 04/07/2017 03/11/2015 87.5 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/07/2018 11/02/2015 94.14 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/05/2019 28/08/2015 84.4 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 10/09/2020 22/07/2015 88.01 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 14/07/2016 09/06/2018 85.13 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 01/11/2017 26/09/2019 85.84 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 04/04/2016 27/05/2008 95.62 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 02/11/2018 77.97 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/09/2019 05/02/2020 58.84 0 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/06/2020 26/02/2016 86.36 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2018 29/08/2014 88.03 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2018 29/08/2014 86.26 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/11/2018 04/03/2015 94.97 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 27/03/2014 04/03/2011 90.77 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/06/2018 25/11/2016 86.41 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 23/06/2015 83.9 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/08/2020 13/02/2015 80.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 01/11/2017 12/06/2020 83.65 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/03/2016 18/10/2017 84.05 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/11/2018 16/07/2020 77.28 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/08/2020 30/04/2009 72.6 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/05/2017 27/01/2016 84.3 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/01/2020 10/07/2015 86.37 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/01/2020 10/07/2015 81.44 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 21/02/2019 19/12/2014 85.72 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/11/2018 14/10/2020 83.84 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2017 25/02/2016 86.01 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/03/2016 13/09/2018 89.26 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2017 09/06/2015 81.47 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2017 25/02/2016 94.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/01/2020 10/06/2015 71.45 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/05/2017 10/06/2015 82.75 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 17/11/2017 81.44 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/12/2016 22/02/2015 84.48 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 18/06/2020 27/04/2016 81.67 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/08/2020 09/07/2018 63.52 31 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/08/2020 18/11/2016 95 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 31/07/2018 04/04/2016 77.26 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 04/10/2018 19/07/2013 90.38 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 21/05/2019 19/11/2015 95.48 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/07/2020 16/10/2009 89.36 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/11/2017 13/02/2017 90.47 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 13/03/2020 04/03/2016 85.18 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/05/2018 30/09/2016 86.56 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/05/2018 30/09/2016 86.79 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 09/05/2012 05/12/2017 92 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/10/2020 16/09/2016 82.73 100 Good Very Good

Page 9 TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/10/2014 02/05/2019 90.52 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/10/2014 02/05/2019 86.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/08/2020 10/05/2018 77.24 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 15/11/2019 04/03/2016 84.27 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 17/07/2018 08/04/2016 72.88 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 03/08/2018 16/12/2015 89.62 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2020 15/09/2016 85.15 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 20/07/2012 83.61 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 09/09/2015 82.25 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Bridge) 11/07/2017 03/04/2019 93.36 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Bridge) 11/07/2017 03/04/2019 68.11 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/03/2020 18/03/2016 76.64 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/04/2018 24/03/2017 80.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/04/2019 22/10/2013 84.95 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/07/2017 24/10/2015 86.9 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/03/2020 21/02/2018 85.57 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 20/03/2020 08/09/2016 94.45 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 04/07/2018 09/03/2012 90.9 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 18/12/2014 89.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/07/2018 15/12/2016 87.89 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 01/09/2017 15/11/2019 84.89 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 15/06/2017 16/10/2019 83.05 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 03/08/2018 11/10/2016 90.91 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 21/01/2020 03/03/2016 81.5 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/11/2016 15/05/2020 92.33 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 10/07/2017 21/01/2020 72.89 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 18/07/2019 03/03/2016 80.7 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/06/2020 12/09/2014 92.17 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/06/2020 21/08/2014 91.01 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 08/08/2018 16/11/2016 86.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/07/2018 12/09/2014 83.74 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/07/2018 12/09/2014 85.14 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2018 22/08/2014 90.95 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 23/04/2019 13/08/2013 88.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/01/2017 19/09/2008 93.64 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 01/11/2016 23/02/2009 94.2 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2019 05/09/2013 82.45 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 12/07/2019 29/09/2015 87.82 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/07/2018 12/09/2014 85.35 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/07/2018 12/09/2014 82.1 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/06/2020 12/09/2014 91.53 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/06/2020 12/09/2014 92.35 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/08/2020 02/07/2010 87.64 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 20/06/2019 22/03/2016 83.09 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 20/06/2019 15/11/2013 79.37 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/05/2016 15/05/2020 84.88 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 22/08/2017 04/02/2016 86.04 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/04/2016 20/02/2019 83.65 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/12/2017 30/10/2012 84.11 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/12/2016 04/06/2009 88.68 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/05/2018 07/12/2016 86.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/01/2017 06/11/2018 87.24 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/08/2018 03/08/2015 91.28 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/11/2016 01/05/2020 90.93 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 29/09/2020 20/09/2016 82.3 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 25/11/2019 26/02/2016 84.14 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/06/2019 30/06/2015 63.16 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 03/07/2012 30/09/2015 86.67 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 19/03/2015 30/09/2015 71.77 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 17/05/2012 25/09/2015 85.73 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/08/2020 09/05/2013 96.59 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/07/2015 15/05/2020 96.72 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/05/2017 24/04/2012 91.24 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/05/2018 25/09/2016 90.79 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/05/2018 04/08/2020 94.58 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/04/2019 12/06/2020 77.63 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/07/2015 03/08/2017 80.84 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/12/2015 29/08/2012 99.27 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/04/2019 05/05/2017 83.49 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 03/07/2018 16/11/2016 79.71 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/06/2017 10/04/2019 83.14 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/10/2019 13/10/2011 91.98 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/07/2017 07/06/2012 87.49 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2015 01/05/2020 62.5 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/08/2020 24/08/2016 78.34 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Highways Mast Arm 09/08/2009 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 25/05/2017 11/03/2014 92.51 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/08/2013 21/03/2017 80.88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 27/08/2015 26/06/2017 88.74 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/11/2015 26/06/2017 93.8 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/05/2019 08/07/2017 94.37 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 10 TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/04/2017 13/08/2013 93.74 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/07/2020 03/08/2016 88.25 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/04/2017 19/08/2013 81.45 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/07/2016 12/06/2020 91.59 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 26/06/2018 16/12/2015 92.49 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/08/2015 05/05/2017 92.57 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/09/2017 05/07/2012 81.94 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 05/05/2017 13/05/2019 86.64 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/04/2019 05/05/2017 92.86 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/08/2015 13/12/2017 91.36 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/08/2018 15/05/2020 90.67 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 15/04/2013 22/10/2009 64.11 55.48 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/12/2015 16/03/2009 91.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 12/08/2019 22/11/2017 88.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 06/10/2015 22/11/2017 92.67 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 23/05/2016 18/06/2009 86.3 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/06/2020 26/09/2018 82.58 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2020 06/08/2014 92.04 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 05/08/2019 27/02/2019 82.56 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/02/2019 15/05/2012 90.93 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/06/2020 16/11/2018 72.34 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/09/2018 25/11/2016 89.95 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/08/2016 31/10/2018 92.86 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2016 25/03/2015 80.74 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/07/2019 30/09/2015 87.64 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/03/2019 03/09/2014 88.82 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/07/2019 30/09/2015 83.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/03/2019 03/09/2014 80.14 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 19/08/2019 86.54 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 05/09/2018 25/11/2016 87.3 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 12/12/2015 98.2 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/01/2019 04/11/2009 87.94 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 21/05/2019 92.92 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 15/06/2020 04/09/2016 81.38 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 15/06/2020 05/09/2016 94.36 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/01/2019 12/06/2014 83.47 65.32 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/07/2016 31/07/2019 78.75 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/01/2019 12/06/2014 81.97 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2016 31/07/2019 75.44 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2016 31/10/2018 88.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2016 19/08/2019 90.47 74.52 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2016 14/09/2009 81.07 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/04/2014 11/03/2019 93.26 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2016 05/08/2019 87.46 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2016 31/10/2018 88.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/07/2016 11/06/2014 83.86 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/02/2019 11/06/2014 84.89 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/11/2018 18/04/2012 89.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 26/02/2016 94.54 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/07/2018 22/06/2016 87.18 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/10/2016 23/11/2014 57.42 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2016 12/08/2019 75.68 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/12/2017 11/10/2015 93.25 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 05/09/2018 23/11/2014 96.27 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 15/06/2020 23/06/2016 85.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 15/01/2019 29/06/2014 90.88 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/09/2016 19/08/2009 85.38 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 23/10/2015 86.36 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/09/2016 12/08/2019 69.47 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/04/2016 12/08/2019 77.89 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/06/2020 11/11/2016 78.84 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/09/2016 23/10/2012 84.76 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/04/2016 20/08/2009 89.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/04/2016 18/08/2010 87.37 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2020 20/09/2016 82.03 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/04/2016 20/08/2009 89.16 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/06/2020 11/11/2016 84.4 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/09/2016 15/11/2018 93.86 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/03/2019 10/11/2016 79.74 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/09/2016 12/08/2019 70.08 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/09/2016 12/08/2019 82.62 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/03/2019 10/06/2014 94.81 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2020 20/09/2016 68.67 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/12/2016 23/04/2012 89.54 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 15/06/2020 14/12/2018 79.24 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/09/2018 24/04/2012 93.96 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/04/2016 15/11/2018 92.13 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 23/01/2020 28/08/2015 88.5 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 14/09/2016 25/11/2008 87.92 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 14/09/2016 28/11/2008 92.67 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 22/08/2014 14/09/2016 88.53 55.48 Good Poor

Page 11 TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 28/09/2015 10/10/2013 94.1 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 20/10/2014 25/04/2016 89.1 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 28/09/2015 10/10/2013 90.05 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/07/2016 12/05/2012 86.1 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/07/2016 12/05/2012 90.91 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 18/09/2016 28/06/2009 97.07 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/01/2020 28/08/2015 78.5 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 29/06/2018 21/06/2014 78.93 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 03/11/2019 06/12/2015 87.6 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/02/2019 09/11/2008 92.66 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 15/12/2017 06/12/2015 90.59 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 06/12/2015 93.02 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 19/01/2020 18/10/2015 78.98 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/05/2016 28/09/2008 88.31 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/05/2016 07/10/2018 87.96 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/05/2016 10/02/2019 89.68 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/02/2019 19/01/2020 88.75 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 14/02/2019 17/06/2012 96.58 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 18/08/2016 03/08/2008 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 11/02/2011 12/05/2019 97.87 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 07/06/2018 17/06/2012 96.83 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 07/06/2018 09/12/2012 93.41 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/06/2020 13/07/2016 92.64 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 24/01/2016 94.83 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 08/09/2017 89.94 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/03/2019 24/05/2016 68.52 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/09/2018 30/07/2014 91.28 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 26/10/2018 01/12/2012 87.38 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/06/2020 24/03/2017 90.6 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 06/09/2017 92.89 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/12/2016 28/11/2012 81.97 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/12/2016 25/06/2008 86.79 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/02/2015 12/03/2020 81.92 28.08 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 28/02/2016 79.21 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/05/2016 06/08/2019 81.92 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/10/2016 18/01/2010 91.19 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2016 13/10/2009 82.35 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/06/2020 21/02/2017 86.18 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/10/2016 19/06/2009 85.8 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/04/2016 19/06/2009 83.86 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/01/2019 20/11/2012 85.51 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/06/2020 13/04/2016 88.13 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2020 13/05/2014 93.17 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/12/2016 18/06/2009 86.4 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 19/01/2016 78.39 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/07/2016 14/05/2014 93.66 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/02/2019 09/09/2020 79.32 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/07/2019 21/01/2016 83.8 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 03/04/2018 74.42 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2014 02/06/2016 86.44 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/04/2016 13/05/2014 86.76 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/10/2017 12/08/2019 78.46 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/05/2016 28/05/2008 89.44 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/02/2019 09/09/2020 83.7 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 26/11/2015 79.7 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2020 08/06/2016 90.31 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/02/2019 08/06/2016 86.82 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/09/2018 08/06/2016 84.52 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 15/01/2016 83.75 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/03/2020 08/10/2008 78.93 100 Fair Very Good Local Authority Bridge 17/02/2009 95.45 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/09/2019 23/10/2015 83.84 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/10/2019 10/12/2008 87.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 03/05/2017 22/01/2016 93.86 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/09/2019 01/11/2009 89.59 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/09/2019 23/10/2015 97.7 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/09/2019 23/10/2015 95.1 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/09/2018 02/08/2014 67.64 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/05/2017 22/01/2016 87.12 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 14/12/2018 20/10/2016 86.33 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/11/2019 24/06/2015 85.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 25/06/2015 87.62 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2015 19/05/2017 84.3 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/11/2018 20/11/2014 73.61 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/10/2013 14/12/2008 91.54 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/04/2019 19/06/2015 92.15 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2018 14/08/2014 72.4 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/11/2018 06/10/2020 78.6 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 18/09/2013 96.48 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/11/2018 25/09/2014 77.87 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/10/2017 19/07/2019 81.69 58 Good Poor

Page 12 TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 18/04/2019 19/06/2015 80.06 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/03/2020 01/04/2017 84.48 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/04/2019 01/04/2017 88.99 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 08/01/2019 25/11/2014 85.52 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 28/11/2018 14/08/2014 90.07 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/10/2017 13/03/2020 88.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 26/06/2015 20/09/2018 81.56 81 Good Good Utility Company Pipe Subway 14/11/2013 06/10/2008 99.53 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/05/2017 25/02/2020 81.5 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/10/2017 08/04/2020 81.46 39.52 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/10/2019 11/11/2015 52.89 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/07/2018 04/08/2014 83.72 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/07/2016 02/05/2018 80.48 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/10/2017 30/06/2019 68.38 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/10/2019 21/06/2015 62.9 55.48 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 10/07/2019 24/09/2015 75.92 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 10/07/2019 23/09/2015 98.96 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 10/07/2019 23/09/2015 71.92 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 29/09/2017 24/04/2019 67.82 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 26/10/2011 26/09/2008 85.81 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 04/04/2016 16/11/2018 80.7 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/10/2020 11/06/2015 82.58 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/06/2020 03/11/2015 72.07 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/04/2018 07/04/2016 82.7 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/03/2016 12/03/2020 73.93 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/07/2016 29/09/2020 91.25 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/03/2016 30/09/2020 72.1 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/04/2014 23/09/2019 76.53 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 17/12/2009 86.91 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 19/01/2017 73.81 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 21/06/2018 76.75 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/07/2018 15/03/2011 93.92 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 26/07/2018 77.75 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/03/2020 21/02/2018 79.28 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 17/03/2016 82.08 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 17/03/2016 77.01 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/10/2017 09/01/2020 81.05 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/04/2019 22/03/2017 81.91 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/08/2020 06/05/2015 77.85 81 Fair Good TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 22/07/2019 14/08/2015 98.86 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/07/2019 12/10/2016 93.15 81 Very Good Good TfL - Highways Mast Arm 23/06/2010 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Mast Arm 23/06/2010 96.9 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 16/10/2019 02/07/2013 88.77 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/08/2017 17/01/2020 62.78 50.32 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/08/2017 19/11/2015 88.45 28.08 Good Very Poor TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/07/2019 30/09/2017 77.24 74.52 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 24/06/2018 82.68 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/04/2018 23/10/2020 79.5 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 20/02/2018 85.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/08/2015 02/03/2017 73.75 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 24/06/2018 78.71 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/06/2016 18/09/2020 72.51 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/04/2018 28/02/2016 83.2 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 02/10/2013 02/03/2017 75.67 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 12/04/2018 84.13 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 31/07/2015 87.14 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/10/2015 25/06/2018 83.25 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/03/2020 25/06/2018 81.29 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/05/2017 14/10/2020 87.73 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/10/2015 14/06/2017 91.79 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 30/07/2019 75.69 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 05/07/2018 87.78 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/10/2020 22/01/2017 84.16 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/11/2017 19/07/2018 89.52 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 30/07/2019 88.35 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/10/2020 18/12/2018 87.05 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/11/2017 23/03/2020 86.02 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/10/2020 05/07/2018 93.93 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/05/2017 05/07/2018 83.52 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/05/2017 30/07/2019 87.77 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/07/2019 07/08/2013 78.68 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/04/2018 16/06/2012 91.28 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/08/2016 10/09/2013 84.24 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/07/2019 13/02/2011 76.39 58 Fair Poor

Page 13 TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 27/11/2013 02/03/2017 71.26 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/03/2020 19/07/2017 77.94 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/07/2018 27/05/2016 83.24 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 11/07/2018 13/03/2017 85.8 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/08/2013 06/03/2009 94.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/08/2013 05/07/2018 88.92 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/08/2017 08/01/2020 70.6 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/12/2015 26/06/2017 86.23 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/10/2017 17/07/2018 75.16 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/12/2015 26/12/2018 78.32 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Highways Culvert 15/11/2013 01/02/2011 99.14 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/03/2020 20/03/2018 69.67 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/09/2020 23/11/2016 79.5 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/09/2020 05/02/2015 93.75 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/09/2017 19/07/2011 86.84 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/08/2018 21/03/2017 87.75 81 Good Good TfL - Highways Culvert 15/11/2013 22/01/2009 92.2 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/08/2018 16/02/2017 82.79 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/08/2018 20/01/2014 77.71 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/01/2017 28/05/2020 85.19 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 26/06/2017 25/04/2013 89.81 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/08/2017 18/07/2019 87.28 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/07/2018 25/04/2013 88.11 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 21/05/2019 19/07/2017 83.96 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 23/10/2014 88.39 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 08/04/2016 86.26 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/05/2018 03/02/2015 95.28 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 17/10/2014 88.71 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/05/2019 24/11/2015 79.7 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/05/2019 24/11/2015 82.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 02/05/2018 20/08/2014 95.09 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 20/03/2020 20/05/2014 80.79 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 02/05/2018 20/05/2014 77.39 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 17/06/2020 20/05/2016 74.75 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/05/2018 07/11/2011 86.67 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 02/05/2018 05/08/2011 91.99 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 10/11/2015 83.49 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 03/08/2016 90.66 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 27/10/2016 87.3 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/11/2018 27/10/2016 92.45 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/05/2018 12/11/2014 93.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/05/2018 03/08/2016 94.89 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/08/2016 24/06/2019 76.91 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/03/2020 08/04/2016 72.97 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/05/2018 04/12/2016 89.15 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/03/2020 25/10/2016 78.41 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 10/11/2015 90.3 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/05/2018 26/10/2016 90.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 10/09/2020 22/09/2014 91.83 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/04/2017 20/11/2013 89.87 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 10/09/2020 16/12/2016 83.38 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 01/06/2018 11/08/2016 91.5 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 26/06/2014 87.46 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/07/2019 18/05/2015 77.31 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/05/2014 05/09/2018 87.09 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 13/08/2020 20/05/2016 74.94 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/06/2018 26/09/2016 80.41 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2018 15/11/2013 88.53 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/05/2014 23/01/2020 82.48 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/11/2018 11/08/2016 80.67 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/06/2018 26/09/2016 83.8 81 Good Good Environment Agency Other (CSS – Bridge) 02/12/2010 01/10/2006 96.27 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/04/2019 30/10/2015 80.98 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 04/10/2018 12/06/2015 89.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/10/2018 09/09/2014 74.31 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/04/2019 13/07/2017 85.9 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/07/2019 18/05/2015 76.94 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/09/2017 11/07/2019 87.9 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/07/2019 17/02/2016 88.51 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/07/2019 20/02/2016 87.63 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/04/2019 17/06/2020 82.83 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/04/2019 17/06/2020 81.14 58 Good Poor TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/08/2020 08/07/2014 94.78 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/11/2018 11/10/2016 93.53 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 26/02/2020 87.52 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 26/02/2020 90.9 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 26/02/2020 90.63 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 10/09/2020 17/06/2013 89.7 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 26/02/2020 93.8 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 28/04/2008 94.07 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 14 TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 06/08/2007 93.81 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/03/2017 30/07/2007 92.77 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 23/07/2019 09/11/2017 84.49 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 11/11/2015 13/11/2019 88.1 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 28/03/2017 06/08/2007 92.55 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 14/02/2020 18/12/2017 68.24 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 19/11/2015 81.35 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/07/2017 25/06/2013 92.38 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/09/2017 06/07/2019 84.25 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 01/09/2017 15/09/2015 84.74 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 11/11/2015 11/09/2007 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/09/2017 06/07/2019 85.78 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/07/2017 26/06/2013 87.72 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 19/11/2015 80.6 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 10/09/2020 09/09/2014 95.91 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 04/10/2018 15/05/2014 83.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 01/09/2017 16/07/2020 61.93 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/07/2017 12/10/2015 88.49 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/03/2020 15/03/2016 90.01 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 23/07/2019 30/06/2015 88.03 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 07/07/2017 02/09/2019 79.58 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/07/2016 05/04/2019 80.49 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 05/04/2019 12/06/2015 87.74 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 28/05/2015 83.78 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 23/02/2017 86.25 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 10/11/2017 16/11/2015 67.88 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 14/06/2011 16/12/2019 75.47 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 10/11/2017 16/12/2019 79.78 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 04/04/2016 73.21 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 25/10/2018 21/07/2016 84.51 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 03/08/2016 15/02/2015 76.72 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 26/06/2019 22/03/2017 72.59 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 05/04/2016 75.45 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 05/04/2016 83.1 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/09/2013 07/04/2016 93.51 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 06/04/2016 65.57 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/04/2017 05/05/2015 81.89 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/07/2019 04/12/2015 96.79 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/10/2017 10/07/2019 93.61 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/10/2017 10/07/2019 69.74 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 25/10/2018 07/04/2016 73.92 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 22/05/2015 62.78 55.48 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 22/05/2015 82.26 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 03/06/2015 83.44 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/09/2013 26/10/2017 86.25 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 27/02/2018 69.77 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 17/07/2020 21/03/2018 71.71 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/04/2017 14/12/2019 73.49 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 02/08/2012 08/09/2009 81.09 65.32 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 08/07/2014 85.89 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 24/04/2018 73.72 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 24/07/2019 21/07/2016 86.2 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 05/04/2018 75.62 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 08/11/2019 09/10/2015 86.35 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/04/2019 07/03/2017 76.41 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 08/08/2017 82.44 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/08/2017 25/04/2020 69.34 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 07/12/2015 76.33 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/08/2017 29/01/2010 91.78 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/06/2019 08/08/2017 83.75 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 13/06/2014 87.67 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 17/07/2020 11/10/2017 74.14 9.72 Fair Very Poor TfL - Highways Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2017 09/12/2019 75.74 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 26/05/2015 76.68 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/08/2017 17/01/2020 65.21 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 29/04/2016 69.81 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 08/08/2017 67.48 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/04/2019 29/11/2015 70.79 65.32 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 28/09/2018 07/10/2014 80.22 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 22/03/2017 81.29 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/07/2019 09/06/2015 88.25 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 16/10/2018 74.75 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/03/2020 30/01/2010 86.23 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Cat Lighting 10/08/2015 17/06/2013 82.04 22.12 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 07/03/2017 83.62 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Mast Arm 96.92 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/03/2020 07/03/2017 80.52 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Cat Lighting 10/08/2015 21/06/2013 86.08 55.48 Good Poor

Page 15 TfL - Surface Transport Subway 28/09/2018 13/06/2014 90.71 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/04/2019 12/05/2015 92.71 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 23/08/2019 05/09/2015 81.43 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 23/08/2019 05/09/2015 75.56 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/07/2015 19/04/2018 89.7 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 16/04/2018 87.46 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/10/2018 26/04/2016 89.5 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2018 29/01/2020 79.63 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2017 22/05/2013 88.14 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/07/2017 02/09/2019 82.68 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 29/08/2019 77.22 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/06/2020 06/11/2014 84.24 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/05/2019 25/08/2017 80.02 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2018 18/03/2015 79.06 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2018 02/10/2014 82.98 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2018 18/03/2015 80.11 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/07/2017 29/08/2019 85.01 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 18/10/2018 28/10/2014 84.64 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/08/2019 25/08/2017 83.87 81 Good Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 12/09/2013 25/06/2008 90.05 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) 10/10/2013 03/10/2014 89.22 81 Good Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 10/10/2013 12/06/2009 87.56 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 23/08/2019 77.32 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2017 12/06/2015 90.12 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/06/2020 02/10/2014 87.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 22/05/2019 04/08/2015 88.63 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/11/2017 17/10/2019 82.71 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/05/2017 03/06/2013 88.32 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/05/2019 12/06/2015 54.48 55.48 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/11/2019 26/09/2017 84.05 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/11/2017 29/11/2019 78.11 28.08 Fair Very Poor TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) 04/05/2011 05/06/2013 73.78 9.72 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/07/2017 28/11/2019 88.74 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/08/2019 13/07/2017 92.25 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 27/03/2020 86.25 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 23/11/2018 13/03/2020 87.2 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/09/2019 02/07/2020 75.69 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 28/03/2017 29/04/2008 90.84 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 24/10/2013 06/11/2019 88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/09/2017 11/07/2019 87.98 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/09/2017 17/07/2018 88.23 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 10/09/2020 13/12/2015 84.89 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/09/2019 27/02/2013 90.08 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 26/10/2017 12/07/2019 86.69 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/01/2020 11/07/2017 97.64 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 26/10/2017 12/07/2019 88.85 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/01/2020 11/07/2017 96.67 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 26/10/2017 12/07/2019 82.32 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/01/2020 11/07/2017 88.31 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Cat Lighting 04/06/2015 04/07/2013 93.95 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Cat Lighting 05/12/2013 24/03/2015 79.88 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/01/2020 11/07/2017 89.55 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/10/2017 05/11/2019 63.42 39.52 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/04/2017 15/04/2015 91.29 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/04/2017 14/11/2013 91.59 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/04/2015 01/10/2020 88.7 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/05/2016 30/04/2014 96.78 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/04/2015 01/04/2017 83.63 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/01/2019 05/11/2014 84.91 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/11/2016 10/02/2018 96.39 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 02/09/2016 15/10/2014 95.89 100 Very Good Very Good Local Authority Mast 30/07/2013 29/09/2014 78.78 55.48 Fair Poor Local Authority Mast 30/07/2013 30/09/2014 85.59 81 Good Good Local Authority Mast 30/07/2013 24/09/2014 83.05 81 Good Good Local Authority Mast 30/07/2013 29/09/2014 89.07 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 14/06/2019 21/10/2009 91.06 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/05/2019 18/04/2009 85.66 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/05/2019 17/03/2009 87.46 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/09/2017 12/08/2015 90.55 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/05/2019 02/12/2015 81.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/05/2019 29/01/2016 84.94 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 21/09/2018 26/07/2016 87.91 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/11/2017 07/09/2020 97.52 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 23/05/2019 29/10/2015 94.63 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/11/2017 07/09/2020 93.83 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 03/07/2018 17/12/2014 90.61 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/05/2019 14/06/2017 78.35 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/02/2019 14/01/2015 81.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/02/2019 16/01/2015 71.28 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/02/2019 23/11/2014 86.89 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/02/2019 24/11/2014 94.83 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 16 TfL - Surface Transport Subway 05/09/2017 24/11/2014 90.58 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 05/09/2017 23/08/2013 85.4 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 12/09/2018 13/01/2015 81.34 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/08/2018 15/01/2015 76.81 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/10/2017 23/05/2019 81.26 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 03/07/2018 21/11/2014 89.53 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/05/2019 07/03/2018 90.49 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 23/05/2019 24/04/2017 91.2 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 08/03/2016 08/12/2010 79.02 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 13/01/2016 08/12/2010 94.28 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/11/2017 08/12/2010 88.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/10/2017 21/08/2013 97.61 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/06/2018 01/07/2014 94.35 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 23/05/2019 16/08/2010 96.11 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2017 20/08/2013 87.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/07/2017 23/05/2019 71.08 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/06/2018 21/07/2014 83.75 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/02/2016 24/07/2018 84.2 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/07/2017 03/07/2019 75.45 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 17/11/2017 03/10/2008 89.72 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 23/08/2016 81.4 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/06/2018 21/07/2014 98.92 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 23/05/2019 04/02/2014 92.39 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 20/10/2017 03/07/2019 90.05 50.32 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 18/06/2020 18/08/2010 89.87 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/09/2017 22/10/2015 89.38 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 22/10/2015 15/09/2017 84.33 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/09/2017 19/11/2009 90.04 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 22/10/2015 15/09/2017 83.95 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Mast 23/05/2019 19/09/2008 98.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 17/08/2018 19/05/2016 94.26 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 01/06/2016 10/07/2018 89.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 24/04/2017 20/01/2020 89.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 01/06/2016 10/07/2018 85.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/09/2017 30/05/2008 91.54 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/09/2017 04/02/2014 89.27 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/10/2017 20/05/2008 92.79 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/09/2017 20/05/2008 89.24 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 18/06/2020 10/07/2018 98.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 18/06/2020 17/08/2018 92.94 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/09/2018 15/05/2014 92.35 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Mast 16/04/2016 10/07/2018 89.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 16/04/2016 10/07/2018 89.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 16/04/2016 02/07/2018 85.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 18/06/2020 10/07/2018 92.94 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 16/04/2016 02/07/2018 92.94 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 20/04/2016 17/08/2018 87.81 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 20/08/2018 25/09/2014 89.02 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 20/04/2016 02/07/2018 89.02 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 23/05/2019 16/12/2017 98.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 23/05/2019 08/08/2013 98.3 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 17/08/2018 06/10/2014 85.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 14/05/2018 95.81 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 14/05/2018 95.18 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 17/06/2020 12/02/2016 83.58 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Mast 03/07/2018 06/10/2014 79.41 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/07/2018 07/10/2014 83.72 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/08/2019 22/05/2018 71.25 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/07/2018 29/09/2014 85.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 17/08/2018 07/06/2016 88.73 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 03/07/2018 29/09/2014 79.41 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 03/07/2018 20/03/2016 89.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/11/2017 01/10/2015 95.17 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 23/10/2015 24/04/2017 87.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/01/2019 13/04/2016 78.65 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/07/2018 07/10/2014 79.41 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 20/01/2020 29/09/2014 91.53 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 03/07/2018 05/11/2014 89.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/01/2019 07/09/2020 69.07 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/03/2014 10/08/2017 93.33 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/05/2019 10/08/2017 86.96 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/09/2020 28/08/2014 86.81 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/09/2017 05/09/2011 89.48 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 08/11/2017 04/12/2013 85.07 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/10/2017 04/10/2013 89.9 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/10/2017 04/10/2013 73.99 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/10/2017 26/09/2013 91.24 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/02/2016 03/10/2013 85.03 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/02/2016 03/10/2013 96.19 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/02/2016 14/09/2011 86.31 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/02/2016 03/10/2013 91.55 81 Very Good Good

Page 17 TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/02/2016 14/09/2011 82.16 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/02/2016 03/10/2013 84.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/06/2020 02/06/2016 87.28 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/05/2019 05/07/2017 90.75 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/11/2017 17/12/2015 92.85 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 01/08/2019 19/11/2013 86.77 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 20/10/2017 11/07/2019 91.44 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2017 19/08/2008 93.09 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/06/2017 12/09/2013 95.83 100 Very Good Very Good Network Rail Subway 16/07/2014 24/11/2008 88.54 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/08/2017 07/03/2016 75.62 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/10/2018 19/10/2016 93.88 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/06/2012 18/10/2016 91.07 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 04/07/2012 18/10/2016 98.25 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/06/2010 16/06/2016 97.9 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 15/07/2020 18/11/2016 90.29 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/09/2020 15/04/2016 81 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2020 06/05/2016 85.41 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/09/2018 11/04/2014 78.77 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/10/2018 11/04/2014 89.39 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/03/2019 Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 26/08/2014 15/09/2016 90.37 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 11/05/2017 03/05/2019 91.98 55.48 Very Good Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/05/2019 22/06/2017 81.75 58 Good Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/03/2019 07/04/2014 72.08 55.48 Fair Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/10/2020 08/07/2016 91.5 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/04/2017 27/05/2015 86.08 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/07/2014 08/07/2016 98.35 100 Very Good Very Good Local Authority Retaining Wall 14/12/2009 97.69 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/09/2020 25/10/2012 88.37 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) 05/04/2017 02/08/2013 90.68 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/09/2016 15/12/2009 94.93 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2019 20/05/2015 65.69 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 03/09/2020 17/05/2016 75.67 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/04/2017 27/05/2015 90.85 81 Very Good Good Local Authority Retaining Wall 04/06/2014 10/07/2012 92.96 78.88 Very Good Fair Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/10/2018 11/11/2016 78.35 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 05/04/2016 18/09/2018 86.94 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/09/2020 22/05/2012 90.06 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 24/08/2017 11/02/2016 85.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 24/08/2018 11/08/2016 81.63 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/11/2018 08/08/2010 61.13 39.52 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/05/2019 09/12/2015 91.92 81 Very Good Good Network Rail Subway 16/05/2012 07/04/2014 91.12 78.88 Very Good Fair

TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/11/2018 10/09/2012 81.5 78.88 Good Fair

TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/08/2017 11/03/2020 60.33 28.08 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/10/2018 23/11/2020 70.81 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/06/2019 13/03/2017 82.78 22.12 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Bridge) 23/05/2016 08/02/2019 87.26 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/06/2019 29/06/2017 67.08 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/06/2020 26/09/2018 64.61 39.52 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/07/2018 25/05/2012 92.36 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/09/2020 09/06/2009 84.29 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/06/2020 17/08/2016 66.13 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/06/2020 16/01/2011 82.62 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/10/2018 12/12/2014 86.81 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/11/2017 20/09/2008 91.45 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 19/12/2017 29/07/2009 84.52 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/09/2020 06/10/2014 91.93 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/06/2020 12/10/2017 86.26 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/08/2019 11/08/2017 93.94 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/08/2017 14/06/2019 90.72 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/09/2017 07/09/2020 96.18 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 01/08/2019 22/11/2017 89.2 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/10/2017 07/01/2009 85.37 55.48 Good Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/10/2017 07/01/2009 90.92 100 Very Good Very Good

TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 16/10/2017 10/03/2020 74.61 31 Fair Very Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 21/06/2018 23/11/2016 92.86 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 21/06/2018 21/04/2015 94.87 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 22/08/2018 17/02/2015 94.49 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 02/07/2012 05/07/2018 92.51 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 05/07/2018 05/01/2017 92.54 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/06/2019 03/03/2016 90.27 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/02/2018 23/09/2012 82.69 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/09/2015 05/11/2011 96.19 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/12/2017 11/09/2012 86.23 58 Good Poor

Page 18 TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 20/11/2019 14/10/2020 81.81 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/06/2018 07/12/2016 86.98 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2018 16/10/2012 87.19 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/08/2018 13/07/2020 73 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/10/2016 14/08/2018 73.79 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/09/2020 26/11/2013 91.61 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2020 04/08/2016 91.84 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/03/2015 11/10/2017 82.14 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 11/07/2018 28/08/2013 91.91 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/03/2019 15/03/2016 75.36 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 02/08/2017 11/02/2020 72.82 58 Fair Poor Royal Docks Management Authority Bridge 28/07/2016 06/06/2018 91.36 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/03/2020 19/08/2013 64.98 55.48 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 29/04/2019 26/10/2016 79.03 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 03/09/2020 28/08/2013 91.18 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/06/2020 19/08/2013 85.2 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/06/2018 07/12/2016 90.22 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/06/2018 07/12/2016 90.4 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/03/2015 24/11/2017 83.89 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/03/2015 11/10/2017 82.15 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 30/03/2017 02/11/2018 86.28 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/03/2015 23/02/2018 79.73 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/03/2015 23/02/2018 85.01 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 26/06/2018 03/06/2016 90.36 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 13/02/2017 05/07/2018 93.1 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/02/2017 25/01/2019 78.98 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 04/08/2020 13/03/2019 74.24 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/07/2018 28/09/2012 81.55 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/06/2017 25/09/2015 87.42 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/02/2017 25/02/2019 89.68 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/02/2017 15/02/2019 88.9 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/12/2016 25/02/2020 84.14 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2017 09/01/2020 82.76 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/05/2018 11/07/2012 84.55 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/05/2018 28/06/2012 84.55 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/10/2016 07/05/2018 87.57 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/05/2018 11/07/2012 82.94 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 01/10/2020 08/12/2016 79.78 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 18/07/2019 17/01/2014 83.79 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 04/08/2020 09/12/2016 75.3 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/08/2018 14/10/2016 77.61 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 22/08/2018 13/10/2011 86.07 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/06/2020 19/01/2018 83.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/06/2020 18/01/2018 84.36 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 09/12/2016 06/02/2014 81.22 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/05/2017 03/08/2015 88.01 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 14/10/2020 09/12/2016 71.89 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/08/2018 21/02/2017 85.98 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/08/2018 30/03/2016 81.53 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/09/2020 13/05/2016 87.53 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/02/2017 25/01/2019 76.51 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 01/10/2020 09/12/2016 67.64 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2018 30/04/2016 76.49 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/06/2018 26/09/2012 85.33 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/09/2020 17/03/2017 64.51 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/10/2020 11/02/2015 85.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/08/2018 29/03/2016 83.53 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/05/2018 01/05/2020 73.21 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 10/05/2018 09/11/2012 90.74 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/05/2016 20/06/2018 79.26 81 Fair Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 07/02/2012 21/08/2013 82.86 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/05/2016 28/05/2018 87.4 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/07/2019 30/12/2015 81.02 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/08/2018 04/06/2020 92.52 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/09/2017 24/07/2013 87.86 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 01/10/2019 04/02/2016 81.01 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 22/11/2015 02/07/2017 86.33 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/06/2018 15/09/2020 87.76 31 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/08/2013 08/09/2014 87.13 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/08/2013 08/09/2014 78.69 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/12/2015 19/07/2017 91.8 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/12/2019 08/08/2017 68.35 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 21/05/2019 04/02/2016 83.72 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/08/2020 15/05/2013 91.84 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 22/07/2020 26/11/2016 87.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/06/2017 03/03/2020 74.7 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 26/06/2018 27/08/2013 78.12 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/07/2018 19/08/2020 91.88 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/08/2018 15/05/2020 95.67 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/11/2015 08/07/2017 91.35 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/06/2020 25/04/2013 94.49 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 19 TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/06/2020 25/04/2013 93.32 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/06/2020 03/04/2009 92.25 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 24/06/2020 03/04/2009 93.33 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/11/2015 08/07/2017 90.4 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/01/2020 12/09/2017 84.85 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 18/07/2019 18/05/2017 90.67 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/01/2020 12/09/2017 86.76 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/09/2020 17/07/2012 93.67 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 18/08/2017 01/10/2019 69.73 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/05/2017 16/04/2019 68.6 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/12/2019 12/07/2017 81.15 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/10/2019 22/03/2016 76.87 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/03/2020 09/10/2016 84.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/10/2018 13/08/2016 92.94 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/10/2018 12/08/2016 90.58 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 11/07/2018 09/08/2016 82.34 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 15/09/2017 12/08/2019 78.22 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/08/2019 05/12/2012 85.41 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/06/2019 23/09/2020 76.24 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/04/2019 05/10/2017 86.6 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/09/2018 03/10/2016 81.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/09/2017 25/04/2019 85.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/06/2017 10/01/2020 73.41 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/08/2019 10/12/2015 87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/07/2018 06/08/2016 88.22 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport CCTV Mast 18/10/2019 22/03/2016 92.59 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/04/2017 09/12/2009 86.97 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/04/2017 08/12/2009 90.09 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/04/2017 26/06/2013 83.02 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/08/2020 29/03/2017 94.07 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/11/2017 10/03/2020 85.54 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 01/08/2019 13/09/2017 86.42 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/04/2011 71.1 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/08/2018 07/10/2014 82.18 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 01/08/2019 11/06/2013 87.48 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/08/2018 07/10/2014 84.68 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 24/08/2018 23/10/2014 92.77 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/09/2020 10/11/2014 89.53 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/09/2020 10/11/2014 83.34 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/08/2018 23/11/2020 90.98 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/11/2017 29/11/2019 73.63 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/08/2018 06/06/2016 90.42 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/08/2019 02/06/2017 81.19 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 09/08/2018 23/10/2014 91.34 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/10/2017 18/06/2013 90.56 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/09/2020 26/09/2016 87.26 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/07/2017 23/02/2016 88.56 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/09/2018 24/07/2016 73.53 9.72 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/06/2020 20/03/2017 61.1 28.08 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/09/2011 25/01/2020 89.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/11/2017 21/01/2020 73.66 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/12/2017 23/08/2011 83.34 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/06/2020 23/03/2017 83.64 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/08/2018 19/08/2016 88.55 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/09/2020 22/10/2013 90.08 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/08/2017 24/10/2013 89.85 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/08/2018 01/11/2019 92.2 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 20/12/2017 28/11/2019 77.12 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/07/2017 22/10/2013 88.56 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 27/07/2017 23/10/2013 86.21 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/08/2019 01/08/2017 84.23 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/08/2019 08/07/2017 66.2 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/09/2014 16/11/2008 91.47 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/07/2019 19/04/2017 74.24 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/07/2019 28/05/2015 74.44 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/07/2019 18/04/2017 73.73 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/09/2014 30/09/2008 92.88 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/05/2012 06/06/2014 89.61 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/09/2014 06/06/2008 92.15 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/05/2012 19/04/2013 95.55 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/09/2014 17/06/2008 93.13 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/05/2017 03/05/2019 87.15 81 Good Good Other Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/10/2018 17/08/2016 91.09 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/09/2020 25/04/2014 87.51 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/07/2014 16/11/2008 94.98 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/10/2018 06/06/2014 90.51 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/09/2020 07/07/2016 88.68 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 16/10/2017 82.25 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 17/10/2017 82.91 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/10/2015 17/10/2017 89.04 100 Good Very Good

Page 20 TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2019 05/11/2013 79.01 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 27/03/2018 27/04/2015 94.16 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/07/2017 30/10/2019 79.68 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/08/2017 08/09/2020 88.17 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/09/2017 23/07/2015 89.25 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/09/2017 12/09/2013 86.01 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/09/2017 08/09/2020 88.8 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/09/2017 07/01/2014 86.6 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/01/2019 17/09/2014 80.04 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 01/08/2019 15/02/2018 80.14 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 24/09/2013 17/09/2014 75.07 74.52 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 03/08/2017 30/10/2019 65.13 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/08/2017 30/10/2019 91.7 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 17/06/2020 22/10/2018 79.16 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/08/2017 21/05/2019 70.84 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/10/2018 10/10/2016 80.38 28.08 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/02/2019 10/11/2014 76.62 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/08/2019 29/08/2017 77.27 74.52 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2015 14/08/2017 94.1 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 01/08/2019 22/11/2017 78.38 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 05/09/2018 21/10/2014 92.08 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 28/10/2019 11/09/2017 64.17 50.32 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 01/08/2017 28/10/2019 86.62 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/10/2018 22/09/2016 79.64 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 08/07/2019 23/03/2016 57.23 28.08 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/03/2020 11/05/2017 93.46 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/09/2015 01/04/2017 93.27 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/06/2019 15/09/2020 91.75 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 15/09/2020 20/06/2014 94.93 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/11/2019 26/06/2015 87.27 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 20/05/2017 24/06/2015 99.17 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/11/2017 18/10/2013 91.14 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/11/2018 11/09/2014 73.63 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2015 02/11/2018 82.42 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/03/2020 01/04/2017 81.55 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/03/2019 22/09/2014 68.12 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/11/2017 30/06/2015 82.27 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/11/2018 11/09/2014 66.84 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 28/07/2015 82.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/09/2019 01/04/2017 84.54 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/10/2017 13/03/2020 86.58 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/07/2016 13/12/2018 81.33 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 06/09/2017 09/03/2020 78.01 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/12/2019 29/10/2015 90.38 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/01/2020 16/12/2015 88.11 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 14/12/2018 17/03/2015 85.52 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/10/2017 14/11/2019 81.79 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/10/2017 14/11/2019 78.56 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 30/07/2015 92.37 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 31/07/2015 87.34 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/11/2017 18/10/2013 84.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 09/03/2020 64.56 100 Poor Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2015 08/11/2018 71.74 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 29/11/2018 14/08/2014 96.22 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/09/2017 14/11/2019 80.53 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 14/12/2018 06/10/2020 81.81 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 07/11/2019 29/10/2015 77.38 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 12/09/2019 13/07/2017 65.01 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/09/2017 07/08/2019 70.74 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/10/2017 07/08/2019 85.94 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/10/2017 18/09/2013 92.92 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/04/2017 18/07/2013 90.06 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/10/2018 06/10/2020 62.11 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/10/2018 21/04/2020 76.71 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 04/05/2017 07/08/2019 79.8 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 16/05/2017 23/09/2015 94.24 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 10/12/2013 14/09/2016 84.54 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 15/05/2017 07/08/2019 68.69 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 05/11/2019 21/07/2015 86.56 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/04/2015 16/10/2018 82.05 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/04/2020 02/11/2018 74.56 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/09/2019 21/08/2009 93.46 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/06/2015 09/05/2017 88.82 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/10/2018 14/07/2014 73.12 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 09/05/2017 82.05 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/09/2017 07/08/2019 76.64 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 06/04/2017 19/07/2013 80.01 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/04/2017 07/08/2019 80.82 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/04/2017 29/06/2015 88.43 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/09/2018 15/09/2020 55.14 50.32 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2019 12/11/2013 75.35 100 Fair Very Good

Page 21 TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/05/2015 15/09/2020 87.71 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 29/06/2015 95.01 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 29/07/2015 13/09/2010 85.91 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 22/05/2015 29/06/2020 78.9 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/09/2017 07/08/2019 75.02 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 05/11/2019 21/07/2015 87.52 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/04/2020 30/04/2014 76.19 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/04/2017 18/07/2013 88.97 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 29/06/2020 83.11 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/03/2020 27/11/2015 78.86 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/01/2020 21/07/2015 89.88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/01/2020 29/11/2013 81.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/10/2018 21/04/2020 71.28 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/10/2020 20/07/2016 73.83 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/10/2018 16/10/2020 70.47 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2015 26/01/2009 88.8 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/09/2018 19/08/2020 75.85 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 29/06/2015 81.18 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Pipe Subway 29/11/2018 29/09/2014 86.22 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 29/11/2018 15/08/2014 93.79 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/07/2020 20/04/2016 81.17 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 14/01/2020 21/04/2017 75.65 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/10/2019 13/11/2017 95.66 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/10/2019 14/02/2009 95.73 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/01/2019 26/01/2009 94.33 100 Very Good Very Good

TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 14/08/2017 17/10/2013 92.75 100 Very Good Very Good

TfL - Surface Transport Subway 08/12/2017 11/10/2013 94.57 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/12/2017 13/06/2009 96.69 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall 06/04/2016 21/07/2003 93.58 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/10/2019 07/01/2018 90.95 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/08/2017 22/02/2009 91.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/10/2019 22/02/2009 86.93 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/01/2019 07/08/2014 89.68 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/10/2019 18/02/2016 96.02 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/08/2017 10/02/2009 85.6 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/10/2019 10/02/2009 90.89 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/10/2019 26/02/2009 91.94 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 19/01/2020 22/11/2014 95.86 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 25/01/2019 08/07/2009 94 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 07/09/2017 23/01/2020 75.47 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 18/12/2016 28/06/2009 90.35 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/05/2018 19/11/2016 86.37 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/05/2018 13/05/2016 87.4 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/05/2018 19/11/2016 82.61 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/05/2016 28/05/2018 87.62 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/05/2018 17/01/2017 89.42 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/05/2019 05/09/2017 86.56 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/05/2018 09/03/2017 85.96 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 14/06/2019 03/08/2015 71.46 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/07/2016 25/09/2014 80.31 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 17/02/2012 11/02/2015 89.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/07/2017 19/03/2020 67.82 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/10/2020 23/10/2014 95.14 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/12/2016 11/02/2015 87.41 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2016 21/04/2020 81.82 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2016 21/04/2020 84.27 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 26/07/2016 21/04/2020 91.82 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/07/2014 11/07/2015 89.68 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/09/2020 19/06/2016 91.43 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/09/2020 28/06/2016 91.25 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/05/2016 25/01/2019 89.5 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/05/2018 18/05/2012 88.68 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/03/2017 20/02/2019 78.84 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/07/2019 29/11/2013 86.03 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/08/2017 20/10/2015 92.26 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/05/2016 25/01/2019 85.05 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/05/2016 20/02/2019 79.71 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 15/05/2018 04/11/2012 93.95 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/07/2018 29/10/2012 89.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/11/2017 25/10/2015 84.94 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2018 05/06/2016 81.72 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/10/2020 18/09/2016 88.25 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 16/02/2015 03/11/2015 91.81 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/10/2018 23/05/2016 85.71 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2020 11/08/2009 94.65 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2020 11/08/2009 90.11 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2020 11/08/2009 90.35 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2020 05/08/2009 91.69 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/08/2020 16/05/2015 92.14 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 04/08/2020 16/05/2015 84.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2017 16/05/2015 80.83 100 Good Very Good

Page 22 TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/08/2017 16/05/2015 90.78 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2020 16/05/2015 85.07 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2018 05/08/2009 94.83 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) 18/06/2020 16/05/2015 90.59 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/06/2020 16/05/2015 92.43 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2020 16/05/2015 95.92 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2020 16/05/2015 94.24 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2020 11/06/2009 87.45 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/06/2020 07/07/2016 80.08 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2020 12/07/2016 95.12 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2015 22/10/2013 90.18 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/07/2014 13/06/2015 93.92 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/07/2014 13/06/2015 94.61 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 08/07/2014 13/06/2015 94.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2020 11/06/2009 85.2 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2020 11/06/2009 88.83 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2016 25/06/2020 87.94 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2020 11/06/2009 91.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/06/2020 11/06/2009 95.19 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/06/2016 02/06/2020 81.5 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/10/2017 17/03/2020 73.17 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/10/2017 13/01/2014 79.83 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/07/2020 01/04/2009 85.79 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/06/2020 01/04/2009 91.67 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/06/2020 01/04/2009 92 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/07/2016 25/01/2019 89.28 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 15/07/2020 01/04/2009 87.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 25/06/2020 20/04/2012 89.1 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/11/2017 21/05/2012 86.28 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/10/2017 29/01/2016 81.79 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/05/2017 13/01/2014 90.05 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 01/05/2018 16/02/2017 88.21 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/10/2020 18/09/2016 85.29 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 04/08/2020 03/02/2017 76.46 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 21/06/2018 16/11/2016 88.35 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/11/2015 21/08/2013 83.5 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 24/08/2018 14/07/2016 95.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 29/05/2019 17/02/2016 82.67 78.88 Good Fair Local Authority Retaining Wall 16/08/2012 12/08/2014 86.12 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 15/01/2015 28/06/2016 95.28 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/11/2016 22/07/2020 88.14 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 03/03/2020 20/03/2016 81.61 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/07/2018 12/08/2014 78.41 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/10/2016 01/05/2020 93.82 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/10/2016 10/09/2014 89.88 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 21/06/2018 20/09/2016 90.89 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/02/2017 24/10/2011 93.8 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/09/2013 09/08/2018 80.98 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/08/2019 17/06/2017 89.6 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 14/11/2015 17/06/2017 87.44 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/09/2020 27/11/2015 93.47 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/09/2020 14/11/2015 85.85 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 31/10/2015 25/10/2017 83.21 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/05/2018 08/07/2020 91.66 58 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/10/2017 19/05/2019 87.2 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 12/08/2019 20/10/2015 91.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/09/2018 15/04/2012 92.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 11/07/2018 05/12/2008 81.06 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 21/07/2018 21/10/2016 80.95 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 17/08/2019 18/09/2020 75.42 Fair Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/06/2019 30/10/2015 81.27 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/10/2020 31/10/2015 88.92 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/04/2019 05/10/2017 84.4 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/09/2017 13/11/2013 87.25 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/10/2020 17/11/2017 81.9 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/04/2019 05/10/2017 76.93 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/04/2019 02/10/2017 78.93 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 23/04/2019 13/02/2018 88.6 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 16/04/2019 13/02/2018 93.87 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/10/2015 24/03/2011 92.7 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 09/07/2019 16/11/2013 81.98 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 18/04/2019 30/10/2015 89.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 18/07/2019 15/10/2020 81.38 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/10/2015 02/10/2017 91.01 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/10/2020 23/09/2017 86.84 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/10/2020 05/10/2017 86.08 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 13/03/2019 03/06/2010 96.46 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/09/2018 06/10/2016 92.36 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/10/2019 22/03/2016 76.1 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 16/10/2019 22/03/2016 68.81 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/07/2019 20/03/2014 89.74 100 Good Very Good

Page 23 TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/03/2020 14/03/2016 80.4 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/10/2015 29/02/2020 65.84 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/10/2015 23/10/2011 86.03 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/03/2020 04/12/2015 72.77 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/09/2019 20/04/2017 86.14 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/05/2017 28/08/2015 86.35 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/05/2019 28/08/2015 78.07 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 02/06/2017 14/09/2008 95.84 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/05/2017 19/06/2008 93.22 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/10/2019 10/04/2017 72.85 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 28/10/2015 13/12/2018 90.55 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/12/2018 27/03/2020 70.87 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/09/2015 07/12/2008 79.23 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/06/2017 28/10/2019 95.48 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/06/2017 28/10/2019 93.13 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/06/2017 28/10/2019 93.96 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Mast 02/06/2017 28/10/2019 91.21 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/12/2018 27/03/2020 76.4 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/05/2019 01/04/2017 55.75 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 02/06/2017 09/09/2019 66.62 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 12/07/2013 89.96 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 03/05/2019 14/09/2017 87.78 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 09/09/2019 14/09/2017 84.66 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 04/10/2017 09/09/2019 86.16 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 24/09/2015 25/04/2017 89.62 81 Good Good Network Rail Bridge 23/08/2013 87.65 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 12/09/2018 28/10/2015 78.46 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 03/09/2014 15/09/2016 98.37 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 12/09/2018 31/07/2015 92.42 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/10/2018 09/06/2016 89.23 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/06/2017 31/07/2015 99.38 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/10/2018 09/06/2016 93.23 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/09/2015 20/10/2018 79.8 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/11/2016 12/03/2018 78.87 22.12 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/11/2016 01/12/2018 80.58 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 11/08/2017 25/08/2019 80.93 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/10/2014 24/01/2017 87.8 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/01/2020 25/11/2017 77.76 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 25/10/2018 24/05/2020 62.21 78.88 Poor Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 18/05/2017 15/12/2015 81.65 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/08/2019 19/11/2017 77.89 74.52 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/08/2019 24/01/2016 76.74 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/10/2018 20/03/2017 74.19 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/06/2020 12/11/2016 70.1 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2016 25/08/2020 64.59 55.48 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/06/2020 10/07/2016 80.7 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/06/2020 08/11/2014 80.9 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/11/2020 05/04/2016 85.15 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/06/2020 10/07/2016 81.34 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/08/2019 14/08/2020 81.71 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Subway 11/09/2018 06/06/2014 87.98 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 13/10/2014 18/05/2008 88.45 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/09/2018 08/06/2016 80.99 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 13/10/2014 18/05/2008 95.15 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/09/2018 08/06/2016 83.15 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/09/2018 08/06/2016 80.77 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 11/09/2018 08/06/2016 78.96 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/07/2016 13/10/2020 87.51 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/10/2020 20/06/2014 94.35 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/04/2017 13/11/2015 94.03 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/06/2016 13/10/2020 93.27 81 Very Good Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 27/09/2012 22/08/2013 79.09 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/10/2020 06/05/2016 91.74 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/10/2018 20/06/2014 89.97 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 07/06/2017 19/09/2019 84.99 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 15/10/2017 21/04/2019 64.52 74.52 Poor Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/10/2017 10/04/2019 61.74 39.52 Poor Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/10/2019 28/06/2015 73.26 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 06/10/2019 28/06/2015 67.96 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/10/2017 02/06/2019 68.98 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 08/10/2017 19/05/2019 66.53 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 15/10/2017 02/06/2019 75.09 9.72 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 17/10/2014 02/03/2017 78.74 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 16/06/2016 16/07/2012 88.61 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/04/2017 12/08/2020 96.54 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/08/2020 05/06/2014 90.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/08/2020 05/05/2016 82.49 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 05/04/2017 19/04/2013 88.92 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/09/2020 05/05/2016 93.24 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 17/09/2020 05/05/2016 92.01 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2020 05/06/2014 91.04 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 24 TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/09/2017 20/12/2008 91.07 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 19/09/2018 17/07/2020 86.2 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 14/06/2017 15/07/2020 86.82 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 19/09/2019 15/07/2020 81.35 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 19/09/2019 15/10/2015 83.13 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 19/09/2019 15/10/2015 83.96 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/07/2020 28/11/2018 81.67 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/11/2018 17/07/2020 66.03 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 03/08/2016 17/07/2020 83.3 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/10/2019 07/07/2017 77.73 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/10/2019 14/05/2013 81.18 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/11/2018 17/07/2020 72.91 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/10/2019 14/10/2015 80.48 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/11/2018 17/07/2020 69.33 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/10/2019 14/10/2015 67.3 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/10/2019 15/07/2020 83.51 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 28/11/2018 17/07/2020 80.53 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 20/03/2020 86.53 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/10/2019 07/07/2017 73.84 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/12/2019 07/07/2017 82.02 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/12/2019 07/07/2017 90.54 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/12/2019 15/07/2020 76 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/01/2019 04/07/2017 71.25 50.32 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/12/2019 15/03/2008 71.36 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 22/09/2015 01/03/2008 91.64 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 21/09/2015 10/07/2009 86.77 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/12/2019 06/06/2013 88.54 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 22/04/2015 28/05/2013 77.44 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/04/2015 28/05/2013 80.77 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 18/03/2020 19/11/2015 78.87 100 Fair Very Good

TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/07/2020 21/01/2019 83.94 58 Good Poor

TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 28/11/2018 23/08/2016 90.01 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/09/2020 25/07/2016 90.19 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/09/2018 14/09/2020 75.4 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 22/08/2017 04/03/2016 85.28 74.52 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 17/07/2020 04/02/2013 95.49 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/09/2020 30/10/2014 86.17 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 27/08/2010 18/11/2008 97.63 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 27/08/2010 10/11/2017 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 15/10/2014 28/03/2008 96.06 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/04/2017 22/08/2013 92.01 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/04/2017 22/08/2013 94.38 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 15/10/2014 10/08/2016 85.71 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/09/2019 16/07/2020 81.53 58 Good Poor Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/06/2014 06/09/2016 85.48 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 12/09/2019 22/04/2015 87 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 15/09/2015 82.42 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 30/05/2019 12/07/2008 87.48 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 03/09/2020 05/04/2016 83.25 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 19/09/2018 15/04/2016 84.31 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/04/2016 07/04/2014 92.99 100 Very Good Very Good Local Authority Subway 03/09/2010 16/01/2009 97.81 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 12/09/2019 27/05/2015 84.93 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 14/04/2015 84.84 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/04/2015 01/04/2017 81.85 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 16/09/2020 85.21 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/04/2015 01/04/2017 84.03 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/10/2020 08/07/2016 93.2 100 Very Good Very Good Network Rail Tunnel 19/01/2011 19/03/2009 94.48 78.88 Very Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 09/11/2015 05/11/2013 86.46 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 09/11/2015 13/07/2009 92.97 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/06/2016 13/10/2020 95.6 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 04/11/2013 16/11/2015 88.65 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Shaft 04/11/2013 16/11/2015 92.64 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 02/06/2016 13/10/2020 98.16 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 17/10/2014 20/12/2008 82.94 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 01/06/2017 03/05/2019 76.91 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) 22/06/2017 20/04/2015 90.94 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/09/2015 12/07/2017 81.64 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 08/11/2018 24/08/2016 82.64 58 Good Poor Bridge House Estates Vault Not Used Not Used Bridge House Estates Vault Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Retaining Wall 24/10/2012 30/09/2014 80.29 28.08 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/12/2014 04/03/2018 82.29 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 07/06/2017 08/02/2013 85.64 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/08/2020 13/04/2016 78.7 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 03/09/2020 18/09/2018 71.35 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/01/2019 17/07/2020 77.25 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/07/2020 21/11/2016 81.55 55.48 Good Poor

Page 25 TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/05/2019 14/10/2011 94.62 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/11/2013 27/06/2010 91.6 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/05/2019 29/09/2015 72.96 58 Fair Poor Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/09/2016 25/10/2012 93.4 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/10/2019 14/03/2018 82.67 81 Good Good TfL - Highways Culvert 15/04/2014 08/10/2012 91 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) 21/02/2008 28/11/2013 92.88 Very Good Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 08/12/2017 16/03/2009 98.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 30/07/2019 19/03/2018 79.78 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/03/2020 27/09/2016 82.6 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 31/10/2011 89.92 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 31/10/2011 89.13 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 31/10/2011 90.01 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/07/2017 31/10/2011 87.59 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/09/2016 14/02/2019 88.4 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 09/01/2016 80.42 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/07/2019 25/03/2009 92.74 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/09/2016 27/03/2009 88.63 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/07/2019 13/01/2014 89.5 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 12/06/2019 23/10/2015 87.57 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 15/08/2015 66.03 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/06/2020 26/09/2018 92.73 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 23/08/2017 69.67 81 Fair Good Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 08/01/2020 10/03/2018 82.99 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/09/2016 25/03/2009 85.69 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/12/2019 25/01/2018 83.21 55.48 Good Poor Environment Agency Footbridge 26/06/2012 23/05/2013 58.74 58 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/10/2018 18/07/2016 93.44 58 Very Good Poor Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 11/09/2018 13/04/2016 72.16 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Subway 04/12/2014 13/04/2016 89.94 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 06/08/2020 13/04/2016 79.09 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 26/10/2011 91.92 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 27/10/2011 92.08 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 24/10/2011 87.11 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 10/08/2017 96.4 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 14/12/2017 22/01/2020 91.6 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 24/10/2011 82.54 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/01/2016 02/02/2018 87.31 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 25/10/2011 94.99 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 01/11/2011 94.93 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 28/10/2011 97.63 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 13/06/2019 01/11/2011 93.33 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 02/11/2011 90.75 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/07/2017 01/11/2011 90.49 100 Very Good Very Good Local Authority Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 05/04/2017 27/05/2015 94.5 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 30/11/2015 30/06/2019 71.88 22.12 Fair Very Poor Local Authority Bridge 18/02/2003 77.56 58 Fair Poor Local Authority Bridge 18/02/2003 80.75 58 Good Poor Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used

Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used

Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used

Page 26 Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Utility Company Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Chamber Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Private Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 08/09/2016 11/09/2019 63.73 81 Poor Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 25/09/2020 07/07/2016 78.09 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 25/09/2020 12/04/2011 86.14 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/04/2019 23/02/2014 92.37 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/04/2019 03/12/2013 88.84 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 19/08/2015 17/11/2013 87.65 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 20/06/2017 04/11/2011 89.83 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 30/05/2019 30/09/2015 86.17 100 Good Very Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - LUL Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 13/06/2019 20/06/2013 87.76 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/08/2019 29/08/2017 75.64 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 17/04/2019 16/09/2017 71.5 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/09/2018 30/11/2012 77.82 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 10/04/2019 03/08/2017 72.35 81 Fair Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 09/05/2017 17/01/2013 97.31 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 18/03/2013 05/11/2020 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 18/03/2013 96.89 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) 26/03/2013 05/11/2020 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used - Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Subway 11/05/2017 16/09/2020 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Vault 13/11/2018 03/10/2019 83.02 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Vault 13/11/2018 11/10/2016 90.82 55.48 Very Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/08/2019 10/02/2018 73.42 28.08 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 01/06/2018 21/12/2016 80.86 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 27/06/2017 26/06/2019 82.9 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/01/2020 20/03/2014 93.32 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 23/01/2020 03/04/2016 94.77 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/06/2017 09/07/2019 68.05 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 10/08/2018 17/06/2012 98.72 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 07/06/2018 09/12/2012 99.17 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 14/08/2015 88.77 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 14/08/2015 87.44 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 13/08/2015 89.78 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 20/03/2020 13/08/2015 83.64 78.88 Good Fair Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used Other Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Other Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 10/07/2017 25/03/2014 85.23 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/03/2020 25/02/2018 85.17 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 30/06/2015 09/12/2019 90.41 81 Very Good Good

TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/06/2016 25/06/2018 80.02 81 Good Good

TfL - Surface Transport Mast 01/05/2017 25/02/2020 93.65 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 01/09/2017 30/08/2013 92.76 81 Very Good Good Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/06/2019 09/09/2015 88.7 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/07/2020 24/09/2013 92.8 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/07/2020 24/09/2013 93.72 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/06/2015 25/07/2013 97.93 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 05/12/2017 13/12/2019 86.95 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 05/12/2017 12/12/2019 85.1 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 01/10/2015 29/08/2013 92.02 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 01/04/2017 06/03/2014 95.47 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 19/04/2013 96.32 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 10/10/2013 99.01 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 23/11/2018 10/10/2013 85.09 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 24/05/2017 27/01/2016 89.71 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/06/2019 08/08/2017 95.03 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/04/2018 29/08/2013 93.75 100 Very Good Very Good

TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 03/12/2015 18/01/2018 87.46 100 Good Very Good

TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/04/2017 22/04/2015 93.95 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 08/12/2017 21/03/2016 95.28 100 Very Good Very Good

Page 27 Royal Docks Management Authority Bridge 26/03/2019 12/06/2020 39.91 Very Poor Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 16/06/2020 16/11/2016 74.94 58 Fair Poor Local Authority Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) Not Used Not Used Local Authority Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 22/06/2017 84.75 81 Good Good Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used Canal & River Trust Tunnel Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 07/03/2019 Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 08/09/2020 18/11/2016 78.46 55.48 Fair Poor Highways Agency Culvert Not Used Not Used Highways Agency Culvert Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge 21/07/2015 91.29 81 Very Good Good Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority River Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used British Rail Property Board Bridge Not Used Not Used Network Rail Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Utility Company Culvert Not Used Not Used Private Bridge Not Used Not Used Private Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/07/2019 09/11/2015 83.56 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Footbridge 30/07/2019 09/11/2015 79.65 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/04/2020 10/12/2015 79.03 100 Fair Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/03/2020 27/08/2015 68.7 58 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) 01/05/2017 27/08/2015 87.08 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 09/09/2015 91.21 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 06/03/2020 30/09/2015 68.91 55.48 Fair Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 24/01/2019 90.17 81 Very Good Good

TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 25/09/2015 82.29 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 18/03/2020 19/11/2015 83.69 58 Good Poor Other Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/06/2017 19/02/2016 95.8 100 Very Good Very Good Local Authority Pipe Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - LUL Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - LUL Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - LUL Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - LUL Chamber Not Used Not Used Local Authority Vault Not Used Not Used Local Authority Vault Not Used Not Used Bridge House Estates Stairs (CSS – Retaining Wall) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Mast 24/07/2019 19/01/2016 76.01 78.88 Fair Fair TfL - Highways Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 24/08/2017 04/03/2016 84.04 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 15/06/2018 16/08/2016 90.26 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Highways Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 17/11/2017 27/03/2016 80.96 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Environment/Boundary Wall 17/11/2017 27/03/2016 81.51 81 Good Good TfL - Highways Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used Private Footbridge Not Used Not Used Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used Local Authority Vault Not Used Not Used Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used Highways Agency Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used Network Rail Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/10/2019 11/06/2015 84.21 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 01/04/2017 20/11/2015 63.14 50.32 Poor Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 21/03/2019 14/12/2016 70.12 31 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/05/2019 20/11/2015 83.01 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 30/05/2019 20/11/2015 78.98 58 Fair Poor Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Other Culvert Not Used Not Used Utility Company Pipe Subway Not Used Not Used Other Culvert Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

Page 28 Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Other Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Local Authority Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 23/08/2017 20/10/2015 96.9 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 12/07/2017 28/09/2015 86.42 81 Good Good TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Highways Other (CSS – Bridge) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert Not Used Not Used Private Gantry Not Used Not Used Private Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - LUL Subway Not Used Not Used Local Authority Culvert Not Used Not Used Local Authority Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry 18/03/2020 06/07/2017 80.18 58 Good Poor Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 18/06/2020 13/03/2016 96.26 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Subway 31/07/2018 14/01/2016 83.88 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 03/08/2015 93.03 100 Very Good Very Good Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Private Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport River Wall 15/09/2015 18/09/2019 74.52 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 16/10/2020 20/05/2017 86.36 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 01/08/2019 07/11/2017 89.12 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 100 100 Very Good Very Good Other Bridge 17/03/2019 13/03/2016 84.33 55.48 Good Poor Other Bridge 27/01/2019 97.16 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 21/05/2019 12/10/2016 84.19 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 25/11/2019 22/09/2017 79.34 81 Fair Good TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel 26/01/2020 87.05 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (CSS – Retaining Wall) 21/03/2020 22/08/2018 78.13 74.52 Fair Fair Other Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 12/04/2019 05/05/2017 83.34 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Tramlink Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Tramlink Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 09/11/2017 93.11 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 25/06/2018 71.11 74.52 Fair Fair TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 09/05/2017 94.42 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/07/2019 19/04/2017 93.34 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 19/04/2017 98.29 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 29/02/2020 13/09/2017 81.24 78.88 Good Fair TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/06/2017 89.44 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/05/2017 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/05/2017 99.06 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 13/09/2017 84.21 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/06/2017 97.68 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/06/2017 95.66 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 19/04/2017 100 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/06/2017 95.47 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Pedestrian Subway 13/09/2017 85.17 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 06/06/2017 96.48 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 06/12/2018 87.23 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/09/2017 93.38 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 03/10/2019 16/11/2017 95.5 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/09/2017 97.96 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/06/2017 98.5 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 22/11/2018 89.94 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 06/12/2018 80.79 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 31/07/2017 82.94 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 31/07/2017 88.35 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 22/11/2018 89.9 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 05/12/2018 81.24 39.52 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/12/2018 90.36 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 29/11/2018 87.29 58 Good Poor

Page 29 TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 19/09/2017 83.74 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/09/2017 86.68 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/12/2018 87.82 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 06/12/2018 88.44 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 29/11/2018 81.87 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 06/12/2018 90.28 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 29/11/2018 94.33 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/12/2018 70.95 9.72 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 05/12/2018 90.38 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 29/11/2018 80.14 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 29/11/2018 87.6 50.32 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 22/11/2018 89.1 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 17/07/2020 19/09/2017 77.35 9.72 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 17/07/2020 19/09/2017 90.23 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 18/01/2018 78.62 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 13/12/2017 91.35 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 30/01/2018 72.03 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 21/11/2017 92.21 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 18/01/2018 82.1 39.52 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 13/12/2017 91.83 81 Very Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 21/11/2017 92.59 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/11/2019 19/09/2017 84.37 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 17/07/2020 19/09/2017 86.45 81 Good Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 19/09/2017 89.35 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 17/07/2020 19/09/2017 92.54 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 20/07/2020 30/01/2018 72.31 39.52 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 10/08/2017 90.86 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 10/08/2017 87.77 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 10/08/2017 78.79 0 Fair Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 07/11/2019 21/11/2017 80.89 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 21/07/2020 21/11/2017 89.38 100 Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/05/2017 93.26 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/05/2017 94.8 100 Very Good Very Good

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Tunnel Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge 10/11/2014 26/08/2010 75.6 58 Fair Poor TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Mast Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Mast Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Tunnel Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Chamber 08/11/2019 13/12/2017 80.38 9.72 Good Very Poor TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used

Page 30 TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Mast Arm Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Mast Arm Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Mast Arm Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Environment/Boundary Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge 12/07/2011 Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Chamber 15/11/2013 Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge 30/10/2014 15/10/2011 Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used

Page 31 TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge 03/12/2013 14/09/2015 Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge 03/12/2013 88.32 81 Good Good TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Culvert Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge 04/11/2014 13/10/2012 87.31 58 Good Poor

TfL - A13 DBFO Gantry Not Used Not Used

TfL - Highways Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

Local Authority Bridge 20/06/2017 75.95 78.88 Fair Fair Local Authority Bridge 03/06/2017 71.66 78.88 Fair Fair Local Authority Retaining Wall 09/08/2017 82.55 58 Good Poor Local Authority Retaining Wall 15/06/2017 77.42 58 Fair Poor Local Authority Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 15/06/2017 89.43 81 Good Good TfL - DLR Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - DLR Bridge 19/12/2014 88.17 58 Good Poor

TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used

TfL - Surface Transport Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 19/03/2020 25/06/2018 72.46 39.52 Fair Very Poor Other Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall 13/11/2017 91.9 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Footbridge Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Subway Not Used Not Used TfL - A13 DBFO Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 09/03/2020 81.43 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 14/06/2019 86.31 55.48 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 20/10/2017 09/03/2020 70.79 55.48 Fair Poor TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 14/06/2019 Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Gantry Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Other (River Pier) Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 05/04/2019 99.42 100 Very Good Very Good - Mast Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge 29/04/2019 95.33 100 Very Good Very Good TfL - Surface Transport Bridge Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Bridge Not Used Not Used Other Other (River Pier) 10/12/2019 Not Used Not Used Private Bridge Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Private Bridge Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used Private Retaining Wall Not Used Not Used TfL - Surface Transport Culvert 03/06/2019 85.89 58 Good Poor TfL - Surface Transport Tunnel Not Used Not Used

Page 32 Appendix 3

Questions to the Mayor

17 December, 2020

WRITTEN ANSWER REPORT

Subject: MQT on 17 December, 2020 Report of: Executive Director of Secretariat

Public Service Secret Shopper Question No: 2020/4782 Tony Devenish I am picking up an “undercurrent” of complaints that public service “customer service” has declined since March. Obviously Covid-19 is a national emergency but it is also when Londoners’ needs are greatest. Would you consider establishing a “secret shopper” team to work across LAS, LFB, Met Police, TfL and NHS London to allay fears? Answer for Public Service Secret Shopper The Mayor Last updated: 22 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Underground Station Staff Question No: 2020/4778 Tony Devenish As we enter the 21st year of the 21st century with London facing, in your words, “an existential threat post-Covid”, how many London Underground station staff do you employ in December 2020 compared to May 2016 across London’s 270 Underground stations? changes to London’s roads that have been introduced since March 2020? Answer for London Underground Station Staff The Mayor Last updated: 22 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 33

Engaging with Londoners Question No: 2020/4707 Susan Hall How would you rate your record of engaging with Londoners, compared with those of your predecessors? Answer for Engaging with Londoners The Mayor Last updated: 22 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Actions following the death of Lucia Ciccioli Question No: 2020/4248 Caroline Pidgeon I understand TfL has now put forward proposals to improve the road layout at Lavender Hill and Elspeth Road following the coroner’s report into the death of Lucia Ciccioli which identified the highway design as playing a contributory factor in her death. Please state: a) What steps has TfL taken to identify where other similar layouts are in place on TfL’s road network, so that similar improvements can be implemented? b) What steps has TfL taken to work with the London boroughs to identify where a similar road layout exists on a council managed highway? Answer for Actions following the death of Lucia Ciccioli The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Cycle infrastructure design LTN 1/20 (1) Question No: 2020/4249 Caroline Pidgeon Following your cycle infrastructure design guidance coming into force earlier this year, what steps is TfL taking to ensure all current proposals for highways improvements that have yet to be implemented are LTN 1/20 compliant? Cycle infrastructure design LTN 1/20 (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London is at the forefront of cycle infrastructure design guidance, with a fantastic track record of delivering high-quality Cycleways across London.

Page 34

Transport for London published the London Cycling Design Standards in 2014, and these standards are comparable to LTN 1/20. I remain confident that all Cycleways are being delivered to the highest quality making cycling safer for all Londoners.

Cycle infrastructure design LTN 1/20 (2) Question No: 2020/4250 Caroline Pidgeon What steps does TfL take to ensure that the funding it allocates to London boroughs involves projects on London borough roads implementing in full the cycle infrastructure design LTN 1/20?

Cycle infrastructure design LTN 1/20 (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Transport for London’s (TfL’s) Cycling Design Standards also apply to projects delivered by London boroughs. All borough cycling projects are reviewed against TfL’s Design Standards prior to funding and implementation to ensure they meet normal requirements. TfL is confident that all TfL borough cycle projects are high-quality and help make cycling safer and more attractive.

Clapham High Street expansion of platforms Question No: 2020/4251 Caroline Pidgeon A constituent has contacted me asking what consideration has been given to the proposal set out in the Centre for London report ‘Turning London Orange’ which advocated Clapham High Street Station gaining additional platforms to allow Southeastern Metro trains to stop. This would allow faster trains to Victoria taking people off the critically congested Northern Line at Clapham North or overcrowded buses to Stockwell, as well as providing much faster orbital journeys from Clapham High Street. Please set out your response to these proposals. Clapham High Street expansion of platforms The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Transport for London is not opposed to the existing Southeastern service between Gravesend / Dartford and Victoria calling at Clapham High Street, should the Department for Transport (whose responsibilities include this service) wish to take this idea forward. However, there would need to be clear consideration of the impact any change to stopping patterns would have on the wider capacity of the rail network. This could significantly affect the value for money of any proposal, which is indeed likely to require the construction of additional platforms.

Page 35

Bus Spider Maps (1) Question No: 2020/4252 Caroline Pidgeon In answer to Mayoral Question 2019/20738 you stated: “Some spider maps have been discontinued as recent research with customers shows that they are used by less than 1 per cent of bus users.” Please respond to the concern that some people have expressed that such a statement underestimates the importance of spider maps for first time or occasional users of a route. Is this 1 per cent of bus users actually a significant number of people that TfL should be assisting, especially at a time when bus usage has been falling in London? Answer for Bus Spider Maps (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Bus Spider Maps (2) Question No: 2020/4253 Caroline Pidgeon In answer to Mayoral Question 2020/0228 you stated: “Although TfL did put its proposed policy to Travelwatch, it did not conduct an Equalities Impact Assessment.” Please state (a) how was the proposal to reduce the number of spider maps presented to Travelwatch in advance of any reduction in spider maps taking place, or were Travelwatch merely informed of the policy once it had been decided and started to be implemented? And (b) why was an Equalities Impact Assessment not undertaken prior to the policy being implemented? Answer for Bus Spider Maps (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Equality Impact Assessments undertaken by TfL Question No: 2020/4254 Caroline Pidgeon What criteria does TfL use to assess whether an Equality Impact Assessment should be undertaken before a change in service provision is made? Answer for Equality Impact Assessments undertaken by TfL The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 36

Motorbike KSIs Question No: 2020/4255 Caroline Pidgeon I understand 31 motorcyclists were killed on London’s roads in 2019, up from 22 in 2018. Has any examination been undertaken whether a contributory factor to the level of KSIs among these road users has possibly been the use of learner motorcyclists and uninsured drivers for food deliveries, a practice which was highlighted by a report in the Sunday Times on the 22nd November? Motorbike KSIs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 There was a worrying increase in the number of motorcycle riders killed from 2018 to 2019, and provisional data from 2020 confirms this worrying trend, with 30 riders having died on London’s roads to date. Data regarding injury collisions on London’s streets is collected by the Metropolitan and City of London police using criteria set out by the Department for Transport. This requires the officer attending a collision to record whether any of those involved were driving for work at the time of the collision, but not the specific type of work that they may be engaged in. It is therefore not possible to reliably determine whether changes in patterns of food delivery driving are a factor that is resulting in changes in casualty patterns. It may also not be clear to the officer attending a specific incident whether one or more of the participants is driving for work. Despite these limitations, data for the three years to 2019 shows that the proportion of deaths and serious injuries among PTW riders who were riding for work (excluding commuting) fell from 161 in 2017 to 147 in 2019. The proportion of total deaths and serious injuries associated with driving for work has remained broadly constant at 14-15%. Although this proportion is not rising, there are still too many people being injured while motorcycling as part of their work. Transport for London has introduced guidance on motorcycle safety into the Fleet Operator Recognition Standard for commercial fleet operators and is holding constructive discussions with companies operating in the delivery sector to reinforce safety messaging and identify opportunities to strengthen safety standards in that industry.

2017 2018 2019 Total PTW fatalities 31 22 31 PTW fatalities while carrying out a journey as part of work 1 1 0 Total PTW riders killed or seriously injured 1099 1080 1019 Killed or seriously injured while carrying out a journey as 161 149 147 part of work KSI during a work journey as a proportion of total 15% 14% 14%

Page 37

Camberwell Station Question No: 2020/4256 Caroline Pidgeon Please provide an update on the status of Camberwell Station and any plans you have to support its re-opening? Have any steps been taken to make use of the Department for Transport Restoring Your Railway Fund? Camberwell Station The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Transport for London (TfL) published a Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) for the potential reopening of Camberwell Station on 18 September 2018. The SOBC showed that, although the provision of the station would clearly improve connectivity, there would also be adverse impacts on existing rail users, while a lack of significant development opportunities means funding would be harder to achieve. Overall, TfL considers that proceeding with this project would not be a good use of public funds at this time. It should be noted that although TfL undertook this work, the station would be built on Network Rail infrastructure and be served by National Rail services, neither of which fall under TfL’s direct control. TfL understands that Southwark Council made an application for funding to develop the case for reopening Camberwell station from the Department for Transport’s Restoring Your Railway fund, but the bid was unsuccessful.

London Power Question No: 2020/4257 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many London households have currently signed up to London Power? London Power The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Since the launch of London Power in January, 3,658 London households were benefiting from fair, affordable and green energy by the end of September 2020. As per my response to MQ 2020/2724 we report on London Power every quarter, with the next update up to the end of December 2020 due in January.

Page 38

London Overground services on Boxing Day Question No: 2020/4258 Caroline Pidgeon Despite a TfL press release on the 18 March 2016 referring to the London Overground stating that “Under the new concession, customers on some routes will benefit from extended operating hours, and new services will be introduced on some routes on Boxing Day”, at present TfL’s website is stating that the London Overground will not operate this year on Boxing Day on the following routes:

• Richmond and Willesden Junction • Gospel Oak and Stratford • Highbury & Islington and Dalston Junction • Sydenham and Crystal Palace • Surrey Quays and New Cross • Surrey Quays and Clapham Junction • Gospel Oak and Barking • Liverpool Street and Enfield Town/Cheshunt/Chingford • Euston and Watford Junction • Romford and Upminster Please set out the reasons why on each section of the London Overground a Boxing Day service will not be operating this year? Answer for London Overground services on Boxing Day The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Delicensing fund for taxis Question No: 2020/4259 Caroline Pidgeon How much of the £42 million delicensing fund to encourage the update of zero-emission capable taxis has been allocated? Please also state the current number of applications that TfL has not yet processed? Answer for Delicensing fund for taxis The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 39

Mayor’s Air Quality Fund (1) Question No: 2020/4260 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how much of the £22 million fund announced on 7 June 2019 has currently been allocated? Answer for Mayor’s Air Quality Fund (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Mayor’s Air Quality Fund (2) Question No: 2020/4261 Caroline Pidgeon To ensure that the number of zero emission capable taxis increases throughout 2021, will you consider using some of the Mayor’s Air Quality Fund to provide reduced or free electric charging for these vehicles for a limited time period? This would help offset the loan payments drivers have had to pay whilst not being able to work in the pandemic. Answer for Mayor’s Air Quality Fund (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Support for taxi drivers Question No: 2020/4262 Caroline Pidgeon I understand that in Liverpool taxi drivers have been given a grant by Liverpool City Council, which is effectively a refund of their licence fee. In other areas one off grants have been provided such as in Sheffield. I further understand that the devolved administrations in both Northern Ireland and Scotland have announced funds to help struggling taxi drivers. Please set out what steps you have taken or intend to take to supporting taxi drivers operating in London. Please also set out whether you have taken any steps to lobby the Government to offer any assistance to taxi drivers, many of whom are part of the 3 million excluded from Government pandemic support. Answer for Support for taxi drivers The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 40

Congestion Charge changes Question No: 2020/4263 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how much the Congestion Charge has raised in revenue since the temporary changes were introduced on the 22 June 2020. Please also state how much revenue was raised over exactly the same period during 2019. Answer for Congestion Charge changes The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tax implications of working from another country Question No: 2020/4264 Caroline Pidgeon What assessment has GLA’s human resources made of the tax implications of staff who have chosen to work from home in the pandemic from another country? How many staff does this currently apply to across the GLA and functional bodies? Answer for Tax implications of working from another country The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tactile paving Question No: 2020/4265 Caroline Pidgeon Please list the stations, platforms and lengths of platform that do not have tactile paving along the edge of platforms at all TfL rail and Overground stations. Please also provide your timetable to ensure tactile paving is provided at the edge of all TfL platforms. Answer for Tactile paving The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 41

Step free access Question No: 2020/4266 Caroline Pidgeon TfL’s Programme and Investment committee papers for 11 December 2020 state that three long promised step free schemes at Hanger Lane, Burnt Oak and Northolt are currently paused pending a further review, following the financial considerations of the coronavirus pandemic. Please set out the timescale for this review. Please also explain why past claims published on TfL’s website that these schemes would be completed by March 2020 were not fulfilled. Answer for Step free access The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Dial-a-Ride Question No: 2020/4267 Caroline Pidgeon TfL’s Programme and Investment committee papers for 11 December 2020 reference plans to replace the booking and scheduling system for Dial-a-Ride, so as to enable TfL to book and deliver trips more efficiently. Please set out in full the intended improvements that the new booking and scheduling system will deliver for users of Dial-a-Ride. Dial-a-Ride The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Assisted Transport Services (ATS) booking and scheduling solution is a key deliverable of Transport for London’s ATS Roadmap. This seeks to ensure safe, convenient, flexible and integrated transport choices to Londoners with reduced mobility. The new ATS booking and scheduling system will benefit all Londoners who require help with travel. The new solution will have to be capable of third-party integration to deliver a ‘one stop shop’ in the future, allowing customers to access multiple ATS providers through a single online portal. The first stage is delivering a new booking and scheduling solution for the Dial-a-Ride service. The solution is intended to improve the customer experience of Dial-a-Ride members by providing an online, self-service channel for bookings and journey updates, while retaining the familiar telephone channels for those who do not have access to online options. The solution seeks to provide more flexibility and convenience for Dial-a-Ride customers by delivering more efficient and responsive scheduling of journeys.

Page 42

Santander Cycles Question No: 2020/4268 Caroline Pidgeon TfL’s Programme and Investment committee papers for 11 December 2020 refer to a feasibility study for the e-bike choice, which was carried out by Serco. Please set out how this feasibility study will be considered. Please also provide details of TfL’s further plans to introduce e-bikes for hire. Answer for Santander Cycles The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Beryl Bike Hire Scheme Question No: 2020/4269 Caroline Pidgeon Despite the Beryl Bike Hire scheme being launched in formal partnership with Watford Council and with stands not being charged for rent on land owned by Watford Council, Hertfordshire County Council or by private landlords, the only organisation that is asking for rent at present appears to be TfL. Will you ensure that TfL reviews this decision and ensures its policies help encourage greater bike use throughout every area that TfL serves? Beryl Bike Hire Scheme The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Beryl Bikes were offered a location at Watford station, but were unwilling to contribute financially. TfL are of course keen to encourage cycling, but providing public infrastructure free of charge for use by commercial companies is not a precedent we are prepared to set in this instance.

More so than ever, we have to maximise the return from our commercial assets, due to the financial constraints TfL currently have. Where dockless bike companies are operating in London Boroughs, arrangements for parking ordinarily are made directly between the operator and the council. This often requires a financial contribution from the operators to offset costs.

TfL is working with the Boroughs to regulate parking for all dockless bike rental companies. The policy position for this work is not to favour specific operators, and parking provision may in time extend to TfL land. As such, any parking provided for private bike rental companies at TfL stations should not be exclusive to one operator, as that sets another type of precedent we should seek to avoid.

Page 43

I remain keen to work together with boroughs on all active travel initiatives and we are in contact with Watford Council on this particular matter.

Modifying IA 17780 to ‘placate’ First Group Question No: 2020/4270 Caroline Pidgeon How can you reconcile your response to Question 2020/3809 that IA 17780 was not “watered down” when the evidence you provided in (a) Question 2020|0023 clearly shows the safety audit was modified, and (b) Question 2020/3276 shows First Group’s Safety Management System performance rating for IA 17780 is formally recorded by TfL’s Audit & Assurance as “Not Rated” and not “Requires Improvement”, as shown in the report’s first draft you provided in Question 2019/12001? Answer for Modifying IA 17780 to ‘placate’ First Group The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Community Speedwatch programmes (1) Question No: 2020/4271 Caroline Pidgeon If boroughs wanted to fund Community Speedwatch Online programmes in certain areas would you and the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime support this? Answer for Community Speedwatch programmes (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Community Speedwatch programmes (2) Question No: 2020/4272 Caroline Pidgeon After running for a number of years how is the Community Speedwatch programme being monitored in terms of its effectiveness of reducing levels of speeding in the areas that it operates in? Answer for Community Speedwatch programmes (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 44

Community Monitoring Groups Recommencing Viewing of Body Worn Video Footage Question No: 2020/4273 Caroline Pidgeon I am pleased that the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime has confirmed that Community Monitoring Groups will finally recommence viewing sessions of Body Worn Video footage. Please provide the timeline for this being re-introduced. Answer for Community Monitoring Groups Recommencing Viewing of Body Worn Video Footage The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Handling of Calls to the Met’s Crime Management Service Question No: 2020/4274 Caroline Pidgeon According to a recent report by the BBC, in January 2019 80% of calls to the Met’s Crime Management Service (CMS) were answered, but by September 2020 this figure had dropped to 49%. Please outline steps the Met is taking to urgently improve this worrying rate of answered calls and what is the cause of this? Answer for Handling of Calls to the Met’s Crime Management Service The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Devolution of Funding for Tackling Extremism in the Capital Question No: 2020/4275 Caroline Pidgeon Do you agree with me that Prevent funding and other funding for tackling extremism in the capital should be devolved and aim to be as transparent as possible? Answer for Devolution of Funding for Tackling Extremism in the Capital The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 45

Former Police Sites Currently Advertised for Development Question No: 2020/4276 Caroline Pidgeon There are several former police sites including the Tooting Police Station site and the Camberwell Police Station site advertised on your ‘small sites’ webpage. How are you working with the Met and boroughs to ensure that these properties and the conditions of their sale, wherever possible, are used for either affordable housing and/or provide some benefit to the local community? Answer for Former Police Sites Currently Advertised for Development The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Building Safety (1) Question No: 2020/4277 Caroline Pidgeon How many residential buildings in London are currently subject to the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005? Answer for Fire and Building Safety (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Building Safety (2) Question No: 2020/4278 Caroline Pidgeon In the last 24 months how many fire risk assessments have been collected by the London Fire Brigade from the Responsible Person and how many of them have been formally reviewed? Please break this down by i) the height of building, and ii) the month/year in which they were collected. Answer for Fire and Building Safety (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 46

Fire and Building Safety (3) Question No: 2020/4279 Caroline Pidgeon What percentage of the high-rise buildings (those over 6 storeys or 18 metres tall) in London have had their fire risk assessments collected and formally reviewed by the LFB in the last 24 months? Answer for Fire and Building Safety (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Building Safety (4) Question No: 2020/4280 Caroline Pidgeon Are you and the LFB looking at how you can work with London’s world-leading tech sector to create and trial building and fire safety solutions across the capital? Answer for Fire and Building Safety (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Building Safety (5) Question No: 2020/4281 Caroline Pidgeon Do you agree with me that it is wrong that under current legislation leaseholders have no legal right to see the fire risk assessment for the building in which they live? Answer for Fire and Building Safety (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Building Safety (6) Question No: 2020/4282 Caroline Pidgeon Do you support the proposal for a public register of fire risk assessments, so would-be renters and owners can check the fire safety status of their potential new home, such as the one used to register domestic Energy Performance Certificates (EPC)?

Page 47

Answer for Fire and Building Safety (6) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Building Safety (7) Question No: 2020/4283 Caroline Pidgeon Would you support the establishment of a public register of fire risk assessors so homeowners can verify that fire assessors are qualified to conduct compulsory checks, and enable government and industry to assess the numbers required to be trained? Answer for Fire and Building Safety (7) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LFB Fire Safety Review of Care Homes Question No: 2020/4284 Caroline Pidgeon I understand the LFB recently undertook fire safety reviews of London care homes. Can you please provide the details of what practical actions came from this review as well as timescales and progress on the actions that were identified? https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/feb/03/care-homes-fail-fire-safety- inspections-risk-to-elderly Answer for LFB Fire Safety Review of Care Homes The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ACM Cladding Remediation Question No: 2020/4285 Caroline Pidgeon According to a recent MHCLG report, there are 251 high-rise residential and publicly owned buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations in London, 72 in Greater Manchester and 137 in the Rest of England. Remediation is complete for 78 buildings in London (31% of all buildings identified in the capital), 38 buildings in Greater Manchester (53%), and 86 buildings in the Rest of England (63%). Do you share my serious concerns that London is significantly behind the rest of the country in

Page 48

terms of the remediation of Grenfell-style ACM cladding remediation works, and how are you working with Government to address this? ACM Cladding Remediation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I am deeply concerned about the pace of remediation of unsafe ACM cladding on London’s buildings. London has more than twice as many private ACM blocks as the rest of the country combined and its built environment is extremely complex. Private sector blocks tend to have more complicated ownership structures, and less co-operative owners who don’t have the same experience carrying out major capital works projects as social landlords. In September, I wrote to more than 40 London building owners who had failed to begin the remediation of unsafe ACM cladding demanding that they accelerate their plans to remove cladding. Since then 21 buildings have begun remediation work. My Building Safety Team continues to work closely with London boroughs, London Fire Brigade and the Government on potential enforcement for those building owners failing to progress at pace. I have also called on Government to put more resource into the joint inspection team.

Letting of Shared Ownership Properties that are Awaiting an EWS1 Assessment Question No: 2020/4286 Caroline Pidgeon Some housing associations are allowing flexibility so that shared owners can let out their property while the building is awaiting an EWS1 assessment as owners are currently unable to sell them without such an assessment. What is your position on this, and if you support this will you be encouraging all housing associations to offer the same degree of flexibility to shared owners in such situations? Letting of Shared Ownership Properties that are Awaiting an EWS1 Assessment The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I am very concerned about the issues that EWS1 forms continue to cause for leaseholders. However, this is a national crisis, and one the Government must resolve. I wrote to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government specifically on this issue in September setting out five key actions ministers should take to resolve this crisis. I have not yet received a response. I understand that subletting restrictions on shared ownership units will cause distress to many shared owners. But I do not believe this issue alone is permissible grounds for subletting in most cases. As UK Cladding Action Group (UKCAG) have rightly highlighted, subletting is not the solution to the building safety crisis. We must focus all our efforts on pursuing a national,

Page 49

long-term solution to this crisis and ensure we achieve the highest standards of building safety to protect all residents and leaseholders across the country.

Retention of Social Housing Stock Question No: 2020/4287 Caroline Pidgeon Will you consider making it a grant condition of receiving Approved Provider and Strategic Partner status during the 2021-26 Affordable Housing Programme that associations should follow the National Housing Federation’s recommendation of only selling social rent voids at Existing Use Value Social Housing to councils or other providers, to retain social rent stock; reduce homelessness, and boroughs’ cost for temporary accommodation? Retention of Social Housing Stock The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Protecting London’s existing social housing stock to ensure that this scarce resource benefits as many people who need it as possible is one of the priorities outlined in my London Housing Strategy. The priorities and requirements for the new Affordable Homes Programme have been agreed and are laid out in the Funding Guidance, and I urge partners to do all that they can to maintain the supply of good quality and affordable social rented stock, for which we know there is overwhelming need.

Regional Reporting of Housing Associations’ Revenues, Costs, and Tenures of New Housing Supply (1) Question No: 2020/4288 Caroline Pidgeon What consideration have you given to requiring separate regional reporting for London and the rest of England? For all multi-region providers, will the GLA report in detail on all sources of revenue (by tenure, for existing stock and new build; capital receipts from social rent void sales/disposals etc); all costs (land/construction etc); and the tenures of new housing supply, for the current and future affordable Housing Programmes, including the available figures for the 2021-26 programme? Regional Reporting of Housing Associations’ Revenues, Costs, and Tenures of New Housing Supply (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The details collected from partners with affordable housing contracts with the GLA, relate only to London programmes. Programme approvals outside London are administered by Homes England.

Page 50

Regional Reporting of Housing Associations’ Revenues, Costs, and Tenures of New Housing Supply (2) Question No: 2020/4289 Caroline Pidgeon Will you make detailed, separate regional reporting a grant condition of receiving Approved Provider and Strategic Partner status for the 2021-26 Affordable Housing Programme? Regional Reporting of Housing Associations’ Revenues, Costs, and Tenures of New Housing Supply (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The details collected from partners with affordable housing contracts with the GLA, relate only to London programmes. Programme approvals outside London are administered by Homes England.

Reporting on Sites Sold or Leased through LDP2 Question No: 2020/4290 Caroline Pidgeon Will you commit to reporting in detail on tenures, rent costs, and developers of all sites sold or leased, (or due to be), through London Development Panel 2 at the earliest opportunity? Answer for Reporting on Sites Sold or Leased through LDP2 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Supporting Noel Park Leaseholders Question No: 2020/4291 Caroline Pidgeon You will be aware that many leaseholders in Haringey’s Noel Park have recently received Section 20 Notices requiring them to pay extortionate bills, often exceeding £100,000, for replacing pod bathrooms. Leaseholders do not object to the works, but the sums they are being asked to pay are significantly higher than those the Council had quoted them previously. Additionally, Haringey Council’s proposed repayment plan would see some leaseholders paying over £3,000 a month in repayments. Will you raise this directly with Haringey Council and speak to those affected to try and find an urgent resolution for residents? Supporting Noel Park Leaseholders The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 51

I understand how worrying it must be for leaseholders at Noel Park to be facing such high costs, particularly at a time when there is considerable financial anxiety for so many people. Although I am responsible for devolved capital budgets for housing, I am unable to fund these costs as they do not contribute to the supply of new homes. I understand that these works are designed to increase energy efficiency. Haringey Council may wish to explore whether it is possible for any funding to be obtained through the Energy Company Obligation, or the more recently announced Green Homes Grant funding. I trust that Haringey Council will ensure that the costs of the works are transparent and properly consulted on with leaseholders through the Section 20 consultation processes.

Partnership flood management funding Question No: 2020/4294 Caroline Russell The November 2020 National Audit Office (NAO) report, Managing Flood Risk, shows that London received the lowest amount of partnership funding for flood defences of any region in England between 2015-16 and 2020-21. In this period, London achieved only £11 million in partnership funding compared with £112 million in the East of England. What actions are you taking to ensure that all possible investment is secured to protect London from flooding? Partnership flood management funding The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Environment Agency and Lead Local Flood Authorities, which in London are the boroughs, are responsible for flood risk management schemes. Funding is provided firstly by Government Grant in Aid (GIA), secondly through local levies from local authorities, and thirdly through partnership funding from direct beneficiaries of flood reduction projects. Partnership funding, which is a private or local authority ‘top up’ contribution from beneficiaries of flood schemes, is needed where schemes do not meet the criteria to be fully funded by Government Grant in Aid. Flood risk funding is distributed based on the level of flood risk which drives the level of investment in each region. London enjoys a high standard of protection against tidal flood risk, the most significant flood risk to London, due to historic investment in tidal defences to manage the risk. Where investment is required in critical schemes to protect the capital, much of London’s flood risk infrastructure meets the funding criteria to be fully funded by GIA, without the need for partnership funding ‘top up’. This is in part due to the high density of homes and other assets. The East of England by contrast, has high flood risk, with a long coastline and low lying land, yet lower populations densities and fewer critical assets at risk. Flood schemes therefore often require partnership funding contributions to meet threshold criteria for a flood defence project to proceed. London and other urban areas find it harder to attract government funding for surface water flood protection, from which London has little protection. The many small schemes

Page 52

needed to manage surface water risk rarely meet the funding criteria. In order to increase investment, we are working with the Environment Agency and other key stakeholders to explore how to better quantify the benefits of widespread strategically located sustainable drainage across London to manage flood risk and create new green infrastructure that can unlock further match funding. Officers are working with partners to estimate what investement in SUDS London requires to fully manage surface water flood risk. This new evidence will allow us to lobby Government for further funding and also to target and prioritise delivery to locations that unlock greatest benefit and value for money.

Transport for London employee travel plan (2) Question No: 2020/4295 Caroline Russell Thank you for your answer to my question 2020/2628. You supplied a general statement on the impacts of coronavirus on staff travel which did not contain the same level of detail as your answer to my similar question 2020/2629 about London Fire Brigade (LFB). Could you confirm whether Transport for London (TfL) has an employee travel plan, and whether surveys are conducted into the modes of transport used by staff to commute to work? If so, could you provide details of this plan, including any targets and measures taken to reduce car commuting, alongside any data held on employee commuting mode share collected over the past ten years? Answer for Transport for London employee travel plan (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Pause to cycleway programme Question No: 2020/4296 Caroline Russell The Transport for London (TfL) cycleways web page states that: “development of future cycleways has been paused while you work on Streetspace for London.” With a temporary funding deal now agreed with Government, can this programme resume? Answer for Pause to cycleway programme The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 53

Analysis of collisions in Kensington and Chelsea Question No: 2020/4297 Caroline Russell The Kensington High Street bike lane was first proposed in 2008. Councillors in Kensington and Chelsea have repeatedly said that they consider the views of their residents more important than those of people who walk and cycle through their borough. Could you provide an analysis, since 2008, of the numbers of serious and fatal collisions involving people walking and cycling in Kensington and Chelsea, and their borough of residence? Answer for Analysis of collisions in Kensington and Chelsea The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Borough Streetspace schemes funded by Transport for London (2) Question No: 2020/4298 Caroline Russell Thank you for your answers to my questions 2020/2622 and 2020/1657 on Streetspace schemes that you have funded in London boroughs. Will you provide a list of these schemes with delivery status including: a) identification number, b) borough, c) project name, d) number of schemes, e) Transport for London (TfL) funding request, f) intervention type, g) initial funding, h) funding to date, and i) a summary of projects by borough and scheme type? Answer for Borough Streetspace schemes funded by Transport for London (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Borough Streetspace schemes funded by Transport for London (3) Question No: 2020/4299 Caroline Russell I understand that a small number of borough schemes funded under your Streetspace programme have been removed. Could you confirm which schemes have been, or are being, removed, and how you are engaging with boroughs to either reclaim the money allocated or get it used to provide alternative schemes to enable safe walking and cycling? Answer for Borough Streetspace schemes funded by Transport for London (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 54

Driver and rider access to welfare facilities Question No: 2020/4300 Caroline Russell The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has reminded delivery and collection sites of their duty to provide rest and welfare facilities, including toilets and handwashing, to delivery drivers (https://www.hse.gov.uk/coronavirus/drivers-transport-delivery.htm). Will you support delivery riders using bikes, cargo bikes and powered two wheelers to access rest and welfare facilities across London? Answer for Driver and rider access to welfare facilities The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Kensington High Street bike lane Question No: 2020/4301 Caroline Russell The bike lane on Kensington High Street delivered under your Streetspace programme provided a much-needed safe cycle link in West London but is now planned for removal by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC). You have said that the: “council must rethink the decision to scrap it.” Will you use your powers to take control of the road and provide safe space for cycling? Answer for Kensington High Street bike lane The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Highbury Corner Question No: 2020/4302 Caroline Russell The Commissioner’s Report to Transport for London (TfL) dated 9 December says that: “all remaining snagging and defect works were completed at the end of October 2020,” at Highbury Corner. Local residents, and people passing through on foot and by bike, have raised the need for local wayfinding signage to connect to destinations and other nearby routes, such as the new Liverpool Road pop-up bike lane. Will you provide local wayfinding signage at this and other major junction schemes? Highbury Corner The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 55

As part of the Highbury Corner scheme, Legible London wayfinding signs have been installed to provide maps of the local area and other wayfinding information. Transport for London is also investigating suitable ways to enhance signing of pedestrian and cycle routes, including the introduction of digital mapping, anticipated to start in first quarter of 2021 as part of the London Streetspace Plan.

Proportion of Londoners living near cycle routes (2) Question No: 2020/4303 Caroline Russell I asked you previously about the proportion of Londoners living near your strategic cycle network by borough in my unanswered question 2020/0061. The published overview of the upcoming report, Travel in London 13, states that 17.9 per cent of Londoners live within 400 metres of your strategic London-wide cycle network. Could you provide data to show what proportion of people in each borough currently lives within 400 metres of a high- quality cycle route? Answer for Proportion of Londoners living near cycle routes (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Strategic cycle network Question No: 2020/4304 Caroline Russell Could you show the length in metres of your strategic cycle network by borough and programme (Cycleway, Quietway, Superhighway, Streetspace) split further to show the length of network on borough roads and Transport for London (TfL) roads within each programme? Answer for Strategic cycle network The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Delivery of protected cycle routes (10) Question No: 2020/4305 Caroline Russell Thank you for your answer to my question 2019/20741. How many kilometres of protected cycle lanes have you now delivered? Can you give the length by: a) overall kilometres, b) route designation, and c) the start and end points for each delivered section of protected cycle route?

Page 56

Answer for Delivery of protected cycle routes (10) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Bridge condition indicators Question No: 2020/4306 Caroline Russell The Times reported on 3 December 2020 that data provided by Transport for London (TfL) in April 2019 showed that 200 out of 500 bridges and other structures it maintains had key sections in poor or very poor condition. Could you provide an up to date list of bridges maintained by TfL, as previously provided to The Times, including details of current Bridge Condition Indicators (BCI) and ratings? Bridge condition indicators The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Transport for London (TfL) has provided an up to date structure condition report in the attached file. This is an update of the report that was provided in April 2019 as part of FOI request FOI-0156-1920. Bridges and structures form a vital part of the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) and TfL maintains them in accordance with safety and serviceability standards. A fundamental requirement to achieve high maintenance standards and to allow asset owners to understand the condition of their structural stock is to regularly undertake Safety, General and Principal Inspections of Highway Structures. These inspections identify elements that might need further inspection, testing, monitoring, repair or replacement and allow these works to be prioritised in accordance with their urgency and with the aim to guarantee safety and best value for money. Each structure is broken down into its elemental parts when inspected and scored on its condition by the severity of any defect and measured against the extent. Through a nationally agreed asset management system – Bridgestation – further refinement of the inspection data allows a numerical score – Bridge Condition Indicator – to be calculated, with one specifically targeted at the primary structural elements (BCI crit) and one that encompasses the entire structure (BCI av). This allows for a very detailed condition and risk profile to be identified and understood for each structural asset, which in turn facilitates a very targeted maintenance and asset management regime. For the avoidance of doubt, a low BCI does not suggest the structure is unsafe. This scoring identifies that enhanced inspections and/or temporary repair works are required and undertaken.

Page 57

Safer streets from reduced traffic (1) Question No: 2020/4307 Caroline Russell Changes in traffic volumes due to both lockdowns this year present a natural experiment to study the relationship between traffic volumes and road collisions. Will you commission a full analysis of the impact of changes in traffic in 2020 and the effect on collisions in the upcoming Transport for London (TfL) report, Casualties in Greater London during 2020? Answer for Safer streets from reduced traffic (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Safer streets from reduced traffic (2) Question No: 2020/4308 Caroline Russell Reduced traffic volumes, particularly during the first lockdown earlier this year, seemed to lead to a reduction in serious and fatal collisions but an increase in extreme speeding. What have you learnt from this, and will it lead to new policy measures to help you achieve Vision Zero? From Travel in London 13 summary http://content.tfl.gov.uk/board-20201209-agenda- papers-public.pdf Answer for Safer streets from reduced traffic (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Financial Health of Young People Survey Question No: 2020/4309 Caroline Russell In your oral response to my question 2018/0939 on 7 May 2018, you said: “City Hall recently conducted a representative survey of young people in London that showed less than half could identify having learned anything at school about how to manage money,” and told me that survey was due to be published on 6 June 2018. Could you share this survey and any subsequent surveys on the financial health of young Londoners? Financial Health of Young People Survey The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 58

This survey is available on the London Datastore as part of our February 2018 YouGov/GLA polling of 16–24-year-olds (https://data.london.gov.uk/gla-poll-results/2018-2/). In that survey 63% of respondents said they didn’t learn anything at school on how to manage their money. As part of the most recent in Survey of Londoners, we also asked about young people’s financial wellbeing covering savings and use of bank accounts but not learning at school. In November 2018 I held a summit of education providers, banks, charities and technology companies to identify the challenges of improving the financial skills of young Londoners in partnership with Money and Advice Service and the education charity Young Enterprise. More recently, the Young Londoners Fund has supported several projects that provide various aspects of financial support to young people. Through the work of the London Recovery Board, I have ensured that young people’s financial wellness is a focus as part of the missions for a ‘Robust Safety Net’ and ‘New Deal for Young People’.

Wider impact of cashless Transport for London stations Question No: 2020/4310 Caroline Russell You are proposing to remove the ability to pay with cash at Transport for London (TfL) stations, and this may encourage other businesses in London to stop accepting cash. What studies and consultation have you undertaken to consider the wider impact of TfL moving to cashless operation on the financial health of Londoners? Answer for Wider impact of cashless Transport for London stations The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Data on rough sleepers Question No: 2020/4311 Siân Berry How have the numbers of homeless people sleeping rough across London changed since the last figures released by CHAIN? Could you share any up-to-date weekly figures to help with winter policy discussions? Data on rough sleepers The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Latest unpublished data, from the end of September 2020 to the beginning of November 2020, shows an average of 425 people were recorded on CHAIN as sleeping rough in London each week, of which an average of 27% (116 people each week) were new to the

Page 59

streets. This data is being used to inform my lobbying of Government for more resources to keep rough sleepers COVID-safe this winter.

Demographics of people housed by GLA hotels programme Question No: 2020/4312 Siân Berry Could you provide a breakdown of the people, both ever and currently, housed in the GLA hotels programme to house homeless people during the coronavirus pandemic by gender and age, including how many of those are under 25, and separately provide data on how many of those housed in hotels have no recourse to public funds (NRPF)? Demographics of people housed by GLA hotels programme The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 As part of the ‘Everyone In’ programme the GLA has provided COVID-safe accommodation to rough sleepers regardless of their immigration status. Of the 1,791 people that have been accommodated to date, 713 guests were EU nationals and 494 were from countries outside the EU. Many non-UK nationals in this accommodation have full entitlements in the UK, but there are also large numbers of non-UK nationals who have unclear or insecure immigration status. GLA officers estimate that currently over 50% of guests in the hotels might have no recourse to public funds but they continue to work with our specialist support services to determine their rights and entitlements and to support any applications they can make to obtain secure status and access to public funds. I continue to urge the Government to provide sufficient funding to continue this work, and to suspend the No Recourse to Public Funds restrictions.

Lack of affordable housing in the London Legacy Development Corporation area Question No: 2020/4313 Siân Berry What are you doing about the fact that the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) area is currently predicted to only provide 22 per cent affordable housing, compared with its target of 50 per cent? Lack of affordable housing in the London Legacy Development Corporation area The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Since 2014, 2,270 affordable homes have been completed across the wider LLDC Area, 22% of total housing delivery.

Page 60

Various factors have impacted delivery, including the implementation of historic planning permissions under my predecessor. From 2017 onwards, schemes which have been granted approval are generally achieving at least 35 per cent affordable housing, in line with my Affordable Housing and Viability SPG and the LLDC Local Plan. The 50 per cent affordable homes target applies to public (LLDC and other publicly owned) land, and not private developments in the wider MDC area. Three neighbourhoods were consented under my predecessor. Chobham Manor will provide 35 per cent affordable housing (up from 28 per cent under the original consent), while East Wick and Sweetwater will offer c34 per cent. Stratford Waterfront, Pudding Mill and Rick Roberts Way will deliver an additional 2,600 homes over the next 12 years and I have invested almost £200 million in City Hall funding to boost affordable housing delivery across these sites to 50 per cent. LLDC will also deliver 50 per cent affordable housing across the three sites it owns within the masterplan area for Hackney Wick Neighbourhood Centre.

London housing data survey and analysis Question No: 2020/4314 Siân Berry The Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG) publishes a detailed factsheet on the accessibility of existing homes as part of the English Housing Survey (EHS) (https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-housing-survey-2018-acc…). The data is not broken down by region because of the small sample size. However, for other measures, such as for overcrowding as part of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment, the GLA carries out analysis of EHS data at a London level, based on a three-year rolling average. Have your officers done the same with this detailed accessibility data? If so, could you share this analysis with me and, if not, could you commission and provide this information? London housing data survey and analysis The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My officers have not produced an equivalent analysis at London level, and the detailed data required to do so is not yet available. When it becomes available my team will consider the feasibility of carrying out a similar analysis at the London level.

Action against developers of buildings with unsafe cladding Question No: 2020/4315 Siân Berry In your answer to question 2020/3826 you state: “In September I wrote to more than 40 building owners who have failed to begin the remediation of unsafe ACM cladding demanding that they accelerate their plans to remove cladding and supply my officers with

Page 61

a timetable for action. Since then 13 of these buildings have begun remediation work.” Could you share with me the timetable for the 13 buildings on which work has started, as well as what action you are taking in respect of the owners of the 27 buildings that have yet to start remediation of unsafe cladding? Action against developers of buildings with unsafe cladding The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The GLA does not share details of specific projects for safety reasons. The average duration of works is forecasted to be 32 weeks for buildings in London; individual projects, however, can take any time from two days to over two years. My officers are regular contact with building owners to assist them in progressing works, with the vast majority due to have begun remediation work by the end of 2020. I am pleased to say that since my reply to question 2020/3826, the number of buildings owned by building owners I wrote to in September that have started on site has increased from 13 to 35.

Use of restraints in custody suites Question No: 2020/4316 Siân Berry In your answer to my question 2019/19697, you told me that it was not possible to provide data on how many times Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) officers used spit hoods in conjunction with other restraints in custody suites. Will you now reconsider making this data available, given that the importance of transparency and public access to data is highlighted in your new Action Plan? Answer for Use of restraints in custody suites The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Young persons’ action group Question No: 2020/4317 Siân Berry Could you give an update on the progress of the young persons’ action group being established by the Violence Reduction Unit (VRU) and how it plans to work in partnership with the London Youth Assembly? Answer for Young persons’ action group The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 62

Officers are drafting a response

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) at COP26 Question No: 2020/4318 Siân Berry Will the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) be the lead force at COP26? Answer for Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) at COP26 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Arrests at protests held during coronavirus lockdowns Question No: 2020/4319 Siân Berry Could you provide data showing the number of arrests under coronavirus legislation, as well as the number of attendees, during each of the main protests in 2020 in central London held in support of a) Black Lives Matter, b) Extinction Rebellion, and c) Groups opposing coronavirus measures? Answer for Arrests at protests held during coronavirus lockdowns The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

The impact of the use of knife images on young people Question No: 2020/4320 Siân Berry A new partnership led by Sheffield Hallam University, and including South Yorkshire’s Violence Reduction Unit (VRU), is to investigate the impact on young people of using images of knives in communications and police work, including whether it may cause more harm than good (https://www.shu.ac.uk/news/all-articles/latest-news/study-launched- impac…). Will you, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) or your own VRU be reviewing the use of knife images by the MPS in a similar way in the near future? Answer for The impact of the use of knife images on young people The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 63

Section 35 Dispersal Orders Question No: 2020/4323 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor how many Section 35 Dispersal Orders were issued in the Metropolitan Police District over the last three years and to tabulate your response by borough. Answer for Section 35 Dispersal Orders The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Metropolitan Police FOI Handling Question No: 2020/4324 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor what has been the Metropolitan Police’s compliance level in handling Freedom of Information requests over the last three years? Answer for Metropolitan Police FOI Handling The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Police Promotion Question No: 2020/4325 Peter Whittle What effect is the Metropolitan Police’s decision to abandon its tried and tested regime of ensuring all officers start at constable and working their way up through the ranks, currently having on the morale of the force’s junior ranks? Answer for Police Promotion The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Facility Time Question No: 2020/4326 David Kurten As you will be aware, the practice, known as ‘facility time’ is when an employee takes time off from their normal role to carry out duties and activities as a trade union representative.

Page 64

On 8 October 2020, LBC reported: ‘In Boris Johnson’s last year as London’s Mayor, TfL spent £4.4m, or 0.23% of its total wage bill on facility time. That body’s latest accounts show that figure is now £8.7m, or 0.4% of the wage bill.’1 The entire Home Civil Service spends just £10m on facility time. So just over £1m more than TfL, in spite of the fact that it has more than 400,000 staff, to TfL’s 27,000. TfL’s cost is also around five times higher than the Government’s recommended spend for public sector organisations, which is based on the average cost of facility time in the Home Civil Service. Whilst I strongly support the principle of effective labour relations in the workplace, I am concerned by this disparity and would be grateful for an explanation of the reasons behind it. 1 https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/uk/bill-for-tfl-staff-on-union-duties-almost-doubles- under-sadiq-khan/ Answer for TfL Facility Time The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Fines for Refusal to Wear a Mask Question No: 2020/4327 David Kurten To ask the Mayor how many people have been given fixed penalty notices for failing to wear a face covering on public transport and what has been the total value of the fines? Answer for Fines for Refusal to Wear a Mask The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Lost Police Evidence Question No: 2020/4328 Peter Whittle I note the report in The Times newspaper on 5 October 2020 that a total of 1,343 pieces of evidence were recorded as lost or misplaced by the Metropolitan Police from the start of 2013 to 15 May 2020, according to data obtained under a Freedom of Information request1. Would you please explain how this state of affairs has come about and what steps are being taken by the Metropolitan Police to rectify it? 1 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/met-police-has-lost-1-300-pieces-of-evidence- cmjdbwj3d#:~:text=A%20total%20of%201%2C343%20pieces,under%20freedom%20of%2 0information%20laws. Answer for Lost Police Evidence

Page 65

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Stonewall Diversity Champions (1) Question No: 2020/4329 David Kurten How much does the London Fire Commissioner pay Stonewall each year to be a Stonewall Diversity Champion? Answer for Stonewall Diversity Champions (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Stonewall Diversity Champions (2) Question No: 2020/4330 David Kurten How much does the Metropolitan Police pay Stonewall each year to be a Stonewall Diversity Champion? Answer for Stonewall Diversity Champions (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Action Fraud Question No: 2020/4331 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor if you are happy with the level of performance of Action Fraud, the UK’s national fraud reporting service, run by the City of London Police? Answer for Action Fraud The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 66

My Local Bobby Question No: 2020/4332 Peter Whittle I note that TM Eye, which runs ‘My Local Bobby’ has successfully prosecuted Nicholas Richards, who has more than 50 previous convictions for shoplifting, after officers from the Metropolitan Police declined to become involved, when he was observed on CCTV stealing Gucci perfume worth £170 from Boots in Piccadilly, central London. TM Eye launched My Local Bobby two years ago. Its 30 ‘bobbies’, uniformed with red vests and caps, provide cover 24/7 for up to 250 houses and businesses on each beat. It promises to have a response officer at the scene within five minutes for a fee of £100 to £200 a month per household1. Is TM Eye currently providing better value for money for Londoners than the Metropolitan Police? 1 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/18/shoplifter-becomes-first-thief- prosecuted-private-police-force/ Answer for My Local Bobby The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Darren Grimes Question No: 2020/4333 Peter Whittle How much tax-payers’ money has the Metropolitan Police expended in its various investigations into the activities of the journalist Darren Grimes? Is he still under investigation and if so, for what? Answer for Darren Grimes The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Taxi and Private Hire Trade and Masks Question No: 2020/4334 David Kurten How many fines, warnings and other sanctions have been given out to i) black cab drivers, ii) private hire vehicle drivers, by TfL Compliance Officers for not wearing a face mask since 1st April 2020? Answer for Taxi and Private Hire Trade and Masks The Mayor

Page 67

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Private Company Policing Question No: 2020/4335 David Kurten Does G4S or any other private company supply the Metropolitan Police with any policing services? If so, what powers of policing do they have? Answer for Private Company Policing The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Taxi and Private Hire Trade and Covid-19 Question No: 2020/4336 David Kurten Given that black cabs have a built-in partition separating the driver from passengers, do you consider that i) black cabs, ii) private hire vehicles, are safe environments for passengers to travel in with relation to Covid-19? Answer for Taxi and Private Hire Trade and Covid-19 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Election Counting Locations Question No: 2020/4337 David Kurten What alternative locations do the GLA plan to use instead of Excel for vote counting in next year’s London elections, given that Excel is in use as a Nightingale Hospital? Answer for London Election Counting Locations The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 68

London Election Counting Machines Question No: 2020/4338 David Kurten Given the widespread reports and allegations of election fraud using Dominion/Smartmatic machines and systems in the US Presidential elections, what is the GLA doing to remove Smartmatic from involvement in the counting of votes in the London elections on 6th May 2021? Answer for London Election Counting Machines The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Abuse of London Underground Staff Question No: 2020/4339 David Kurten I note the poster campaign about passengers abusing staff, currently being run by TfL on the London Underground. I would be interested to learn the statistics of how many staff have been abused over the last five years on the Underground and I would like you to categorise your response by types of abuse. Answer for Abuse of London Underground Staff The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Covid-19 Question No: 2020/4340 David Kurten What discernible impact (if any) has Covid-19 had on the operational effectiveness of the London Fire Brigade? Answer for Covid-19 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 69

Scotch Eggs Question No: 2020/4341 Peter Whittle I would like some assurance from you that under the current Coronavirus restrictions officers of the Metropolitan Police will not be entering licensed premises to argue with landlords and customers about whether a Scotch Egg constitutes a ‘substantial’ meal and ordering customers to leave pub premises as soon as they had finished their meals, thus preventing them from ordering more drinks1. In my opinion, for a variety of reasons, which I have previously raised, the Metropolitan Police has not done its reputation any favours over the last year and I believe that a heavy-handed approach to this issue will only serve to estrange it even further from Londoners. 1 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/03/overzealous-police-patrol-pubs- argue-landlords-scotch-eggs/ Answer for Scotch Eggs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Working from Home Question No: 2020/4342 David Kurten I was surprised to learn from the press that Mr Jack Stenner, the GLA’s director of political and public affairs, on a salary of £120,000 a year, has quit London for an apartment in San Francisco, some eight hours behind London, whilst retaining his post. I would be interested to learn if you believe someone residing in Northern California can do an effective job as member of your senior management team from 5,000 miles away1. 1 https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13364319/sadiq-khan-aide-working-from-home- california/ Answer for Working from Home The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

School attendance Question No: 2020/4344 Jennette Arnold OBE There has been a “collapse” in secondary school attendance this term. What can you do as Mayor to help schools and ensure young people in London are attending?

Page 70

School attendance The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 It is understandable that young people, parents and carers might be feeling anxious about attending and sending young people to school at this time. I welcome the announcement from the Secretary of State for Education on 15 December that mass weekly testing will be introduced in January for all secondary schools, which will give reassurance to parents that more is being done to ensure schools are COVID safe. It is essential that the Government provides the capital’s schools and colleges with the resources to quickly mobilise and roll out testing when children return after the Christmas holiday. My teams continue to provide guidance and the latest coronavirus updates for London. These are available at https://www.london.gov.uk/coronavirus. This includes government guidance for young people, parents and carers on school attendance, such as information on travelling to school, use of face coverings, vaccinations and advice for looking after mental health. Communications to young Londoners has formed a core part of our public health guidance communications strategy and we have been undertaking targeted communication through social media such as Snapchat and Instagram to inform young Londoners about the Government’s guidance and to encourage them to comply with it.

PRU attendance Question No: 2020/4345 Jennette Arnold OBE We know that drug gangs prey on vulnerable young people. Those excluded or missing school are of the most likely and most vulnerable to this. Estimates show that only just over half of pupils are attending state-funded AP and PRU schools this term, compared with 78% attendance in mainstream secondaries. What work are you doing to protect those young people in particular? Answer for PRU attendance The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Black curriculum Question No: 2020/4346 Jennette Arnold OBE The recent report by the Black Curriculum says that the national curriculum ‘systematically omits’ black British history. Given your work on the Black Curriculum, have you had conversations with the Education Secretary about this? If you haven’t, will you write to him?

Page 71

Black curriculum The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Schools must be fully inclusive of all students. This means reflecting the diverse identities, histories and cultures of all young people so that each has an equal sense of belonging in the classroom. I wrote to the Education Secretary on 2 October about this important topic - please see Mayor’s Question 2020/3862. My recent response to the Government’s Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities also included a call for a more inclusive national curriculum that reflects Black British history.

School funding Question No: 2020/4347 Jennette Arnold OBE National Association of Head Teachers has warned that we may see a mass exodus of teachers post-covid as they are facing burn-out and unprecedented levels of stress. What work are you doing to support teachers in London? School funding The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Effective quality school leadership has never been more important. My Getting Ahead London programme has been adapted to support middle and senior management to overcome the challenges teachers and students are facing due to Covid-19.

New sessions and speakers have been added to focus on mental health and well-being. Participants on the programme also benefit from the support of their coach, and the wider group of teachers taking part in Getting Ahead London, with whom they can share action they are taking and discuss the unprecedented pressures of this year. My Stepping Into Leadership programme aims to encourage people from ethnic minority backgrounds into teaching and to stay and progress onto school leadership. Its recent launch event focused on mental health and well-being in recognition of the impact of Covid-19 on ethnic minority communities.

Adult Education Budget Question No: 2020/4348 Jennette Arnold OBE How are you encouraging enrolment of Londoners with SEND needs in your skills programmes? Adult Education Budget

Page 72

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Londoners with SEND have been disproportionally affected by COVID-19 and continue to be a priority group for skills interventions.

To encourage enrolments, I am launching a campaign to raise awareness of the benefits of learning and training, targeting Londoners most affected by the pandemic, including SEND learners. I am also launching a peer research project focused on improving access to AEB for underrepresented groups including disabled Londoners.

My £6.5m ESF Programme for 16-24-year olds with SEND will target young people with learning difficulties and/or disabilities; physically disabled Londoners and/or those with long-term health needs; and social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) needs to achieve sustained education, training or employment results.

Earlier this year, I launched the Covid-19 Response Fund to help Londoners most affected get support with digital skills, including equipment to support accessibility and prevent digital exclusion. The LEAN network has now also expanding its careers support to help students with SEND in schools with their skills and career pathways.

Adult Education Budget (2) Question No: 2020/4349 Jennette Arnold OBE How are you encouraging enrolment of BAME Londoners in your skills programmes? Adult Education Budget (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Currently, more than half (56%) of all Adult Education Budget (AEB) London learners are from a BAME background. Given that people from BAME communities are more likely to experience child poverty, deprivation and unemployment, I want to ensure the AEB actively supports them to access new education and training opportunities. To do this, I am investing £25m of AEB funding available from next academic year to increase the funding available deliver all qualifications up to and including level 2 to help learners lacking basic skills to progress. I am also launching a £10m grant award fund to help adult Londoners gain relevant skills to move into good work in London’s key sectors. This is alongside changes I have already made this academic year, including fully funding year-long level 3 qualifications for unemployed Londoners and those in low pay, and

Page 73

making budgets more flexible to allow AEB providers to run more targeted pre-employment and job-focused training to support those hit hardest by the pandemic. I will also shortly launch a marketing campaign focused on driving up AEB enrolments among those groups most affected by the pandemic.

Adult Education Budget (3) Question No: 2020/4350 Jennette Arnold OBE Can you tell me how you have adapted your Adult Education programmes to ensure those hardest hit by the pandemic are not left behind? Adult Education Budget (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have allowed Adult Education Budget (AEB) providers to use 10% of their funding to provide non-accredited training. This will unlock up to £23m for pre-employment and job- focused training to support those hardest hit by the pandemic. In July, I launched an £11m COVID-19 Response Fund to help AEB providers adapt during the pandemic, including supporting additional provision for those furloughed or made redundant, and providing digital equipment and training for those most at risk of digital exclusion. I have supplemented the £12.9m COVID-19 Skills Recovery Package London received from the government with a further £2m to support unemployed Londoners, including those who are long-term unemployed. This year, the AEB includes an essential digital skills entitlement, meaning digitally excluded Londoners can access free provision to improve their digital skills. I have made all ‘level 3’ qualifications, lasting for a year or less, free for any adult Londoner unemployed or earning below the London Living Wage, giving them the opportunity to gain new skills or retrain.

Adult Education Budget (4) Question No: 2020/4351 Jennette Arnold OBE Can you confirm how many applicants there were to Strand 2 of the COVID-19 AEB response fund and how many were successful? Adult Education Budget (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Strand 2 of the COVID-19 Response Fund invited applications from both AEB grant- funded and procured providers for one‑off grants to support the up-front costs of building capacity to enable providers to adapt their delivery of education and training to respond to the immediate and medium‑term impact of COVID-19.

Page 74

From a total of 103 eligible providers, 80 organisations applied and were awarded funding. A list of awards made through Strand 2 of the COVID-19 Response Fund can be found here.

Adult Education Budget (5) Question No: 2020/4352 Jennette Arnold OBE Following your call for further devolution of funding and a return to 2008 levels, what conversations have you had with Government? Adult Education Budget (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Following the joint publication of the ‘Call for Action’ (September 2019) with London Councils, my Deputy Mayor for Planning Regeneration and Skills and I made the case for further skills devolution at meetings with the Education Secretary and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Apprenticeships and Skills. I have also worked closely with the M9 group of Mayors. We have raised a collectively agreed proposal for further skills devolution in meetings with the Prime Minister, the Chancellor, the Minister for Employment, and the Regional Growth and Local Government Minister. I set out calls for further skills devolution and increased funding in my submission to the Treasury ahead of November’s Comprehensive Spending Review, and, following a letter from M9 Mayors, the Prime Minister has agreed to delegate administration of the forthcoming Level 3 funding extension to London and the Mayoral Combined Authorities. My officers have discussed our CSR and Lifetime Skills Guarantee proposals with Treasury and Department for Education officials and I have requested further meetings with Ministers on these issues.

Adult Education Budget (6) Question No: 2020/4353 Jennette Arnold OBE As so many AEB funded courses are happening online, how have you changed your assessment of courses? Adult Education Budget (6) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The arrangements for assessing courses delivered by providers under adult education budget remain the same for online and directly delivered courses. Following delegation of

Page 75

the adult education budget, Ofsted remains as the body responsible for inspecting the quality of provision at organisations providing education and training in London. Awarding bodies also carry out their own checks on courses to maintain the consistency of awards in addition to the checks that Ofsted would complete. As with the previous academic year, the GLA continues to receive information and monitor delivery on learner participation, retention, completion and achievement for all courses, including those delivered online.

Adult Education Budget (7) Question No: 2020/4354 Jennette Arnold OBE As so many AEB funded courses have moved online, (a) has the capacity of courses increased in any areas and (b) have you seen demand fall or increase? Adult Education Budget (7) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 As part of my immediate skills response to the pandemic, I launched my £11m Skills for Londoners COVID-19 Response Fund to support adult education providers develop their digital infrastructure so they had increased capacity to deliver provision online while Londoners were unable to attend their courses in person. At present the GLA is not able to measure either demand or the capacity for particular courses. The GLA does receive information on enrolments which captures where capacity meets demand. However, due to data reconciliation processes we will not be able to see the full picture of how this looks for the current academic year, or compare against previous years, until December 2021. In preparation for the 2021-22 academic year the GLA is looking to capture more detailed information on how providers are planning their provision to meet learner needs both online and through in-person delivery. We expect to collect these plans ahead of the next academic year in September 2021.

Home schooling Question No: 2020/4355 Jennette Arnold OBE More children are being taken out of school to be home-educated, particularly among families from minority ethnic communities, who are at greater risk from Covid and may be more fearful of catching it. Further to your Learning at Home platform earlier this year when schools were closed, what are you doing to ensure those children who remain home- schooled in London are still receiving a full education? Home schooling

Page 76

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Government must step up their support for schools and local authorities to ensure home-schooled children receive the full education they are entitled to by law. This includes ensuring all children have digital access to learning, which I have called on the Education Secretary to do – please see Mayor’s question 2020/1877. I have also put in place a variety of initiatives to support parents, carers, teachers and students during the pandemic - please see Mayor’s question 2020/3337.

Rising unemployment (1) Question No: 2020/4357 Leonie Cooper The Chancellor’s comprehensive spending review outlined bleak projections for the economy over the coming few months, particularly with regards to unemployment. Can you provide projected unemployment figures for London with comparisons to other UK regions? Answer for Rising unemployment (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Rising unemployment (2) Question No: 2020/4358 Leonie Cooper How will you support Londoners who become unemployed during this pandemic? Rising unemployment (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have acted quickly to ensure unemployed Londoners affected by the pandemic are benefiting from the devolved Adult Education Budget (AEB), which is our main lever in supporting a wide range of skills and training provision in the capital. In addition to an £11m COVID-19 Response Fund, I have introduced funding for any Londoner who is unemployed or earning below the London Living Wage to undertake a course at level 3. I have also allowed grant providers to spend 10% of their funding this year – up to £23m – to support Londoners with short, sharp retraining interventions. European Social Fund (ESF) projects and Mayoral initiatives such as the Mayor’s Construction Academy, London Progression Collaboration, Digital Talent Programme, the London Enterprise Adviser Network, Employment Rights Hub and the Workforce

Page 77

Integration Network are also helping Londoners most in need to access opportunities and support. Tackling unemployment and supporting Londoners into good work is a key priority for the London Recovery Board, which I co-chair and which will support joint action across London.

Brexit and London’s businesses (1) Question No: 2020/4359 Leonie Cooper Can you provide an update on what London’s businesses are telling you with regards to the transition period ending at the end of this month (December 2020)? Brexit and London’s businesses (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London business leaders have told me that they want the UK Government to agree a trade deal with the EU before the transition period ends. A no deal Brexit would cause enormous damage and must be avoided at all costs. However, the Government has failed to provide any certainty for businesses about the changes they will need to make; or support to do this in reasonable time. As a result too many businesses remain uninformed about what the end of the transition period means; and are unprepared for the challenges they could face. Many have been too overwhelmed by the impacts of the pandemic to focus sufficiently on Brexit. We are continuing to provide Brexit-related support through my London Business Hub. But if a trade deal cannot be found I therefore urge the Government to seek an immediate extension to the transition period.

Brexit and London’s businesses (2) Question No: 2020/4360 Leonie Cooper Are there are business sectors who are telling you that they are looking forward to a no- deal Brexit, and if yes, what are the benefits that they identify? Brexit and London’s businesses (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 No, quite the opposite. The CBI, London Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and London First all of whom who I meet with regularly have been very clear that a no deal Brexit would cause enormous damage and must be avoided at all costs.

Page 78

They agree with me it is absolutely vital – for the good of the country and all of Europe - that the Government continue to negotiate and secures a deal that protects our economy and vital industries such as finance, law, professional services, the creative industries and technology. If a trade deal cannot be reached, I am urging the Government to seek an immediate extension to the transition period. A no-deal outcome should simply not be an option. Getting this deadly virus under control and protecting jobs, livelihoods and businesses must be our absolute priority.

Brexit and London’s businesses (3) Question No: 2020/4361 Leonie Cooper Are there are business sectors who are telling you that they are looking forward to Brexit with a deal, and if yes, what are the benefits that they identify? Brexit and London’s businesses (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s business leaders have been clear in their conversations with me that they want the UK Government to agree a trade deal with the EU. They want to avoid a costly and disruptive no deal Brexit that would leave many businesses struggling to survive and lead to increases in unemployment. However, they are also disappointed the Government has failed to recognise the importance of the services sector in its approach to the negotiations. London is a world leader in finance, law, professional services, the creative industries and technology. Under any deal, these companies will now lose the access they had to the EU’s single market because of the government’s foolish “red lines”. I have always said that retaining membership of the European single market and customs union would have been the best way forward for the UK’s economy and people.

Tier 2 in London (1) Question No: 2020/4362 Leonie Cooper What support is the Government providing London’s businesses under the latest Tier 2 restrictions announced on 26 November 2020? Can you break this down by sector? Answer for Tier 2 in London (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 79

Tier 2 in London (2) Question No: 2020/4363 Leonie Cooper What support is the GLA providing London’s businesses under the latest Tier 2 restrictions announced on 26 November 2020? Can you break this down by sector? Answer for Tier 2 in London (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tier 2 in London (3) Question No: 2020/4364 Leonie Cooper Can you list the support that the Government is providing Londoners under the Tier 2 restrictions announced on 26 November 2020? Tier 2 in London (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme pays employees 80% of their salary for hours not worked up to £2,500. Self-employed support is available however many are ineligible, including the recently self-employed and those who trade through a limited company. Local Authorities are delivering Local Restrictions Support Grants and discretionary Additional Restrictions Grants to businesses. The government offered ‘wet’ pubs, that do not serve substantial meals in Tiers 2 and 3 a one-off £1,000 payment. Covid-19 has presented unforeseen challenges to people and businesses across London and there still remain a staggering number of Londoners who are not eligible for these schemes. This is an intolerable position for these businesses and individuals to be in and many are facing continued financial hardship through no fault of their own. The Government needs to increase financial support for businesses, rectify the gaps in the self-employed scheme and make the main safety net work better for workers given many self-employed are relying on Universal Credit instead.

Tier 2 in London (4) Question No: 2020/4365 Leonie Cooper Can you list the support that the GLA is providing Londoners under the Tier 2 restrictions announced on 26 November 2020? Tier 2 in London (4)

Page 80

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Following the Government’s announcement on 2 December that the nation would go into a three-tier system of COVID-19 restrictions, I moved swiftly to make sure Londoners were aware of the latest health guidance and what they need to do. My team produced bespoke translated information for different communities to explain the Tier 2 restrictions, including translations in Gujarati, Polish, Somali and Turkish. My officers have also been supporting London’s Higher Education sector to coordinate with TfL and relevant health bodies on student travel and testing over Christmas. My Employment Rights Hub continues to provide support to those workers that have concerns about how their work and income is affected by coronavirus and my London Business Hub provides support to businesses, having supported 1,500 businesses so far. Over £1.1m of Covid Recovery Business Grants have been offered and £4.3m of CBILS loans secured for delivery through the GLA’s arm’s length SME funding body, Funding London.

My Pay-it-Forward London campaign has raised over £1.4million for over 400 small businesses and over £350,000 has been allocated via my Back to Business Fund. I launched my Resilience Fund and a £2.3m Culture at Risk Business Support Fund with 660 cases registered with the Culture at Risk office.

“Because I’m a Londoner” campaign Question No: 2020/4366 Leonie Cooper Can you provide an update on how London & Partner’s #BecauseImALondoner campaign to restore consumer confidence is progressing? Answer for “Because I’m a Londoner” campaign The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Recovery of tourism (1) Question No: 2020/4367 Leonie Cooper At a recent meeting of the Economy Committee, London & Partners suggested that international tourism may not fully recover until 2024. Do you agree with that assessment? Answer for Recovery of tourism (1) The Mayor

Page 81

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Recovery of tourism (2) Question No: 2020/4368 Leonie Cooper What levels of domestic tourism have we seen in 2020, compared to 2019? Answer for Recovery of tourism (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

No deal Brexit Question No: 2020/4369 Leonie Cooper What would a no-deal Brexit mean for London’s economy given the current economic crisis, and how does this compare to GLA research “The economic impact of Brexit on London” published in October 2019? No deal Brexit The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 A no-deal Brexit under any circumstances means great damage to the London economy, with less growth and fewer jobs being created. In the current circumstances, as businesses across many key sectors struggle to survive, it will be yet another devastating blow. It could prove the final straw for many London businesses, contributing to a triple-whammy of bankruptcies, inflation and unemployment. The 2019 GLA research referenced in your question estimates the impact of a no deal Brexit on the London economy from a range of different bodies: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/brexit-analysis-final.pdf More recently, GLA Economics’ London Economic Outlook Autumn 2020 https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/leo-autumn-2020.pdf discusses the impacts of COVID-19 and Brexit. It argues that while COVID-19 will have a significant detrimental impact on the economy, the effects of Brexit in whatever form it takes will be markedly higher and more permanent in the long run. The Government’s own Office for Budget Responsibility has recently confirmed this, highlighting the greater damage of a no-deal Brexit: http://cdn.obr.uk/CCS1020397650- 001_OBR-November2020-EFO-v2-Web-accessible.pdf

Page 82

10pm curfew (1) Question No: 2020/4370 Leonie Cooper What impact has the 10pm curfew had on London’s economy? 10pm curfew (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Government’s curfew has had a terrible impact on London’s night- time economy and the hundreds of thousands of jobs it supports. It has hit our hospitality, culture and leisure sectors, as well as their suppliers. It may well have been counterproductive in reducing the risk of the virus spreading by forcing customers onto the streets and transport network at 10pm.

Pubs, restaurants and venues across the capital have invested considerable sums in making themselves COVID secure. This includes cutting capacity, ensuring social distancing, recording contact details for track and trace, and requiring customers to be seated. The curfew has restricted the ability of businesses to trade profitably and has unnecessarily put many of them at risk of closure. When the Tier system was introduced, I called for the curfew to be scrapped. While the Government has now extended the curfew to 11pm, this is still not going far enough and will not help. Answer for 10pm curfew (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

10pm curfew (2) Question No: 2020/4371 Leonie Cooper Will the 11pm curfew help London’s hospitality sector? 10pm curfew (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 No. It was disappointing that rather than scrapping the ineffective and counterproductive curfew entirely, the Government only extended it to 11pm. Hospitality businesses across the capital have spent considerable sums making their venues COVID secure. While the extra hour will allow customers more time to finish meals and

Page 83

drinks, there will be minimal financial benefit from the extended curfew to pubs, restaurants and venues, as they will still have to stop serving customers at 10pm. The revised curfew continues to disproportionately affect London’s LGBTQ+ venues. 40% of their normal weekend trading hours are after 10pm – exactly the time they have to stop serving. The curfew is a blow to London’s vital hospitality businesses which support many jobs and who have done so much to help stop the spread of the virus. They have endured a very difficult year. The sector will need a comprehensive package of long-term support to ensure business can recover including an immediate extension to the business rates relief for sectors and locations most impacted.

10pm curfew (3) Question No: 2020/4372 Leonie Cooper With the Government extending the curfew to 11pm, what measures will you be putting in place to support social distancing when bars and restaurants close? 10pm curfew (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I am pleased we persuaded the Government to get rid of the 10pm curfew but extending it to 11pm, when it should have been scrapped altogether, is a mistake. The curfew is counterproductive and continues to force customers onto the streets and transport network at the same time, rather than enabling staggered leaving times. The High Street Reopening Group, co-chaired by my Night Czar, the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and the Chief Executive of the London Borough of Hounslow, brings together local authorities, the Met Police, Transport for London and business groups to address safety and licensing issues such as this. London Boroughs are recruiting and training new COVID Marshalls as well as redeploying staff to support their on-street enforcement teams. Local authority officers are also doing a vital job helping businesses and the public to trade, shop and socialise safely.

City Hub and Network for Gender Equity (1) Question No: 2020/4373 Leonie Cooper I welcome the news that the capital is a co-founding member of a ground-breaking international network of cities committed to advancing gender equality. What practical steps will be implemented as a result of this new initiative? Answer for City Hub and Network for Gender Equity (1) The Mayor

Page 84

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

City Hub and Network for Gender Equity (2) Question No: 2020/4374 Leonie Cooper How will CHANGE (City Hub and Network for Gender Equity) be evaluated? Answer for City Hub and Network for Gender Equity (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Gender Pay Gap (1) Question No: 2020/4375 Leonie Cooper I was pleased to see that the City Hall gender pay gap is close to zero. However, the economic gender gap will not close for another 275 years on current trends and women are more likely to be adversely impacted as a result of this pandemic. How are you sharing your good practice with London’s employers? Gender Pay Gap (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 It’s deeply concerning that global progress on closing the gender pay gap is happening so slowly. I’m speaking out about the unfairness of pay inequality and leading by example, ensuring GLA Group organisations have robust action plans to measure and tackle pay gaps. My Good Work Standard encourages businesses to publish their pay gap data and demonstrate their commitment to tackling pay inequality. Together with five other cities across the world, I recently founded CHANGE, the City Hub and Network for Gender Equity. The network will amplify our calls to employers within our cities to end pay inequality and help us tackle the problem by sharing data and building collaboration between cities.

Page 85

Gender Pay Gap (2) Question No: 2020/4376 Leonie Cooper How is the economic crisis impacting on the work being carried out to close the gender pay gap in London? What action are you taking to prevent good progress in being lost? Gender Pay Gap (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 It’s clear that lockdown measures affected Londoners’ jobs unequally. More women than men were furloughed and lost jobs, and this difference was even more striking between mothers and fathers. The ‘Helping Londoners into Good Work’ mission of the London Recovery programme will ensure groups of Londoners most affected by the economic crisis, including young women and mothers, are able to access employment support, skills and training. This year has seen employers demonstrate commitment to the moral case for, as well as the business benefits of, inclusive workplaces. Pay transparency is an essential part of ending pay discrimination. I’ve asked employers to voluntarily publish gender pay gap data this year, and I’m calling on government to reintroduce mandatory pay gap reporting from 2020/21.

Gender Pay Gap (3) Question No: 2020/4377 Leonie Cooper How will you ensure that City Hall’s gender pay gap will remain close to zero in the re- profiling of the GLA budget? Answer for Gender Pay Gap (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Ethnicity Pay Gap Question No: 2020/4378 Leonie Cooper How will you ensure that City Hall’s ethnicity pay gap does not get larger in the re-profiling of the GLA budget? Answer for Ethnicity Pay Gap The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 86

Officers are drafting a response

Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (1) Question No: 2020/4379 Leonie Cooper A recent survey found that 20% of people in the UK intend to drive more in 20211. Are you concerned about this and what do the air quality figures for 2020 show? 1 The Guardian, ‘People plan to drive more post-Covid, climate poll shows’ [Date accessed 24.11.2020] Answer for Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (2) Question No: 2020/4380 Leonie Cooper What is your assessment of how Londoners’ transport use will change post-Covid? Answer for Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (3) Question No: 2020/4381 Leonie Cooper What monitoring of the interventions to suppress a car-led recovery from Covid-19 are currently taking place? Answer for Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 87

Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (4) Question No: 2020/4382 Leonie Cooper To what extent do you think low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) are protecting London’s air quality and through this Londoners? Answer for Increased mobility post-Covid and air quality (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Zero Emissions Buses in London (1) Question No: 2020/4383 Leonie Cooper How many zero emissions buses currently operate in London? Answer for Zero Emissions Buses in London (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Zero Emissions Buses in London (2) Question No: 2020/4384 Leonie Cooper Which routes in London do zero emissions buses operate on? Answer for Zero Emissions Buses in London (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Zero Emissions Buses in London (3) Question No: 2020/4385 Leonie Cooper What monitoring of the impact of zero emissions buses has been made? Answer for Zero Emissions Buses in London (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 88

Officers are drafting a response

Zero Emissions Buses in London (4) Question No: 2020/4386 Leonie Cooper Now that all twelve Low Emission Bus Zones are operational what assessment has been made of the impact they are having on air quality? Answer for Zero Emissions Buses in London (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Zero Emissions Buses in London (5) Question No: 2020/4387 Leonie Cooper Do you know if there are plans to replace the EU air quality law which we have been measuring London’s air quality against? Zero Emissions Buses in London (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Yes. The draft Environment Bill mandates the setting of two air quality targets, including one for PM2.5. However, the Bill only requires these targets to be set by October 2022 and the targets themselves may not need to be achieved for 15 years or more. Greater urgency and ambition is needed for the protection of human health. The draft Bill is currently in Parliament and Government has opened a call for evidence to inform the development of the PM2.5 target, which the GLA has responded to through the submission of our report on tackling PM2.5 in London, available here: https://www.london.gov.uk/WHAT-WE- DO/environment/environment-publication…, The air quality limits set out in the 2008 European Directive on Ambient Air Quality and transposed into UK regulations have been instrumental in improving air quality and holding Government to account for achieving their implementation. It is of huge concern that the number of standards could be reduced or their enforcement weakened following Brexit if the new Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) does not have the proper powers to hold Government to account. Poor air quality remains the biggest environmental risk to health. It is essential that Government maintains the legal standards outlined in the Directive. But I have also called on them to go further and adopt the stricter WHO guidelines for PM2.5 as a legally binding limit within the Environment Bill. The Bill also needs to ensure the proposed OEP has the powers needed to hold the Government to account.

Page 89

I have adopted a target of meeting the WHO guidelines by 2030 in my Environment Strategy and will continue to work toward these, including by expanding the ULEZ up to the North and South Circular roads next October. But it is past time for Government to step up, match my ambition, and adopt the legal standards we need to eradicate harmful levels of air pollution once and for all.

The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution (1) Question No: 2020/4388 Leonie Cooper In ‘The ten point plan for a green industrial revolution’ the Government sets out an expansion of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods schemes. How much of this funding is expected to come to London? The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Prime Minister’s ‘Ten-point plan for a green industrial revolution’ makes reference to the Government’s commitment to invest £2bn in walking and cycling schemes over the next five years, including new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods, school streets and segregated cycling facilities. In 20/21, the Government allocated £250m of this funding to local authorities in England through the Active Travel Fund, including £25m of funding for London. Transport for London has worked with the Department for Transport to allocate this amongst the London boroughs. It is currently unclear whether London will be eligible for further allocations from the Active Travel Fund in 21/22 and beyond. We will continue to make the case that a proportion of this funding should be available for schemes to be delivered in the capital.

The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution (2) Question No: 2020/4389 Leonie Cooper In ‘The ten point plan for a green industrial revolution’ the government sets out an expansion of school streets schemes. How much of this funding is expected to come to London? Answer for The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 90

The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution (3) Question No: 2020/4390 Leonie Cooper In ‘The ten point plan for a green industrial revolution’ the government sets out plans to extend segregated cycle lanes. How many miles of new cycle lanes are expected to be funded in London? Answer for The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Flood defences and London Question No: 2020/4391 Leonie Cooper In ‘The ten point plan for a green industrial revolution’ the Government sets out plans to invest £5.2billion into a six year plan to improve flood defences. How much of this funding will be available to protect areas at risk of flooding in London? Flood defences and London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Government’s forthcoming flood risk management programme is twice the size of the last allocation and is available to all regions in England. The funding is distributed based on the level of flood risk which drives the level of investment in each region. In the next four years the Thames regional flood and coastal committee area, within which London and the Thames Valley sit, will receive £228m. The average across all flood and coastal committee regions is £196m. A region makes bids for funding based on a pipeline of projects so a region can only access as much as it bids for within the funding rules. However, historically little government funding has been allocated for managing surface water flooding, despite this being the main flood risk to London for which there is limited flood protection (see MQ2020/4294). To unlock funding for surface water schemes in future, GLA officers are working with the Environment Agency and other stakeholders to quantify the benefits of multiple, smaller, widespread sustainable drainage measures across London to manage flood risk. These measures also bring the benefit of creating new green infrastructure bringing more nature to London. Officials are also exploring how the Government’s new £200m resilience and innovation fund can support projects to reducing surface water flood risk in London, including several catchment based approaches to surface water management and a pan- London early flood warning system proposal

Page 91

London is currently well protected from tidal flood risk, but without action the standard of protection will decrease as the climate changes. We are supporting the Environment Agency’s update of the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and 10-year review. This review includes maintenance and enhanced tidal walls and embankments as well as assessing when a new Thames Barrier will be needed. Funding for shorter term actions in the plan will come from this coming funding cycle.

Solar Generation and TfL Question No: 2020/4392 Leonie Cooper What assessment has been made of TfL’s eligibility for the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme and whether this can be used to bring forward the retrofit accelerator scheme for solar energy generation? Answer for Solar Generation and TfL The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Electric Vehicle Charging Points (1) Question No: 2020/4393 Leonie Cooper How many publicly accessible electric vehicle charging points are there currently across London? Please provide a breakdown by borough separating the numbers of rapid and standard charging points. Answer for Electric Vehicle Charging Points (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Electric Vehicle Charging Points (2) Question No: 2020/4394 Leonie Cooper How many charging points is it estimated that London will need by 2030? Answer for Electric Vehicle Charging Points (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 92

Electric Vehicle Charging Points (3) Question No: 2020/4395 Leonie Cooper In ‘The ten point plan for a green industrial revolution’ the government sets out plans to increase the number of electric vehicle charging points across the UK. How many of these are likely to be allocated to London? Answer for Electric Vehicle Charging Points (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London’s Recovery Missions Question No: 2020/4396 Leonie Cooper When is the deadline for responses to the consultation on your London Recovery Programme as outlined in your London Recovery Programme Overview paper published in October 2020, and what is your process for taking on board responses received? Answer for London’s Recovery Missions The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

A24 (1) Question No: 2020/4397 Leonie Cooper Have you had any negative correspondence about the A24 from Wandsworth Councillors and if so, how many emails or letters? Answer for A24 (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

A24 (2) Question No: 2020/4398 Leonie Cooper Have you had any negative correspondence about the A24 from Merton Councillors and if so, how many emails or letters?

Page 93

Answer for A24 (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

A24 (3) Question No: 2020/4399 Leonie Cooper Have you received any correspondence from residents of Wandsworth about the A24 and if so, how many emails/letters have you received? How much has been negative, how much positive? Answer for A24 (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

A24 (4) Question No: 2020/4400 Leonie Cooper Have you received any correspondence from residents of Merton about the A24 and if so, how many emails/letters have you received? How much has been negative, how much positive? Answer for A24 (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Hammersmith Bridge (1) Question No: 2020/4401 Leonie Cooper Can you give me an update on the current situation for the bridge repairs? Answer for Hammersmith Bridge (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 94

Hammersmith Bridge (2) Question No: 2020/4402 Leonie Cooper Can you tell me how much money TfL has spent on the Hammersmith Bridge plans so far? Hammersmith Bridge (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 To date, Transport for London (TfL) has spent £16.7m on investigations, feasibility, design, monitoring, and early works. As part of the funding settlement agreed with Government in October 2020, TfL has committed a further £4m over the next four months, for repair works, together with funding to set up a ferry service, and to carry out further improvements to bus services, traffic lights and road monitoring to help keep traffic flowing. TfL will continue to work with all stakeholders and with the Hammersmith Bridge Taskforce to agree a long-term solution.

Hammersmith Bridge (3) Question No: 2020/4403 Leonie Cooper How many times has the taskforce met to discuss the situation and has City Hall been represented at every meeting? Answer for Hammersmith Bridge (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Rainbow Cities Network Question No: 2020/4404 Leonie Cooper Has the Mayor considered joining this network of cities that have come together to support and enhance the interests of their LGBT+ citizens? Rainbow Cities Network The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Thank you for bringing this interesting initiative to my attention. I will ask my officers to explore membership requirements as member cities are represented by equality and diversity policy officers and not by political representatives.

Page 95

Ban on Polluting Advertising Question No: 2020/4405 Leonie Cooper Will the Mayor ban the advertisement of the most polluting vehicles on assets owned by any part of the GLA? Answer for Ban on Polluting Advertising The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Scaffold Licence TFL10107 Question No: 2020/4406 Leonie Cooper Could the Mayor through TfL please investigate the situation in Upper Tooting Road with regard to this expired scaffolding licence and be in contact with the company to make sure it renews its licence or is fined? Answer for Scaffold Licence TFL10107 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Santander Cycles, Southfields (1) Question No: 2020/4407 Leonie Cooper Has Wandsworth Council or any Wandsworth Councillors contacted TFL or any part of the GLA about an extension of the Santander Cycle scheme to Southfields Station in Wandsworth? Answer for Santander Cycles, Southfields (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 96

Santander Cycles, Southfields (2) Question No: 2020/4408 Leonie Cooper I have been contacted by the Southfields Business Forum, who have lobbied me against an installation of a Santander Cycle rack close to Southfields Station - have you also seen this correspondence and what is your response? Answer for Santander Cycles, Southfields (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Removal of LTNs Question No: 2020/4409 Leonie Cooper I refer to question MQT 2020/3899, has this review taken place and if so, did Wandsworth Council receive all the funding and did any funds have to be claimed back? Answer for Removal of LTNs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Homes valued at £100,000 Question No: 2020/4410 Leonie Cooper Several constituents have been in touch about some information they have seen about homes for sale for £100,000. Could you shed some light on whether this is at all feasible - has MHCLG offered a new subsidy pot, or is there some free land available now in London? Homes valued at £100,000 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 In November 2020, I launched the details of my Affordable Homes Programme 2021-2026. Because the greatest need in London is for social rent, I negotiated a majority social rent programme. Shared ownership is an important part of affordable housing delivery, but I’m concerned that proposals to deliver 100,000 shared ownership homes at £100,000 do not reflect London’s housing need. London would need significantly more funding through the Affordable Homes Programme 2021-2026 than Government has provided to deliver 100,000 shared ownership homes alongside an adequate number of social rented homes. I have long called for additional

Page 97

funding to be provided by the Government, but the first priority must remain building homes for social rent. Even assuming shared ownership homes are delivered at the £28,000 fixed grant rates within the current Affordable Homes Programme 2016-2023, this would take up £2.8 billion of the £4 billion of total funding. Diverting funding away from building homes for social rent would mean homeless people and people in overcrowded accommodation having to wait longer for a decent, affordable home.

Handcuffing practices Question No: 2020/4412 Unmesh Desai What changes have been made to Met’s police practice in the use of handcuffs following the review announced by the Commissioner in July? Answer for Handcuffing practices The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Domestic Abuse perpetrator intervention funding Question No: 2020/4413 Unmesh Desai On 15 November, the Home Office announced funding for interventions working with perpetrators of domestic abuse, including for some constituencies in London. What criteria was used to determine the ‘benefitted’ and ‘impacted’ constituencies and how will the money be spent? Answer for Domestic Abuse perpetrator intervention funding The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Stop and search training Question No: 2020/4414 Unmesh Desai As part of your Action Plan, will all Met officers be required to undertake refreshed stop and search training? Answer for Stop and search training The Mayor

Page 98

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Body Worn Video research Question No: 2020/4415 Unmesh Desai Do you know what the timescales are and remit of the academic work to be undertaken on a sample of body worn video footage to better understand the nature of stop and search interactions and the behaviour factors of officers or individuals that lead to escalation in the use of force? Answer for Body Worn Video research The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Delivery board membership Question No: 2020/4416 Unmesh Desai You have said that a board will oversee the delivery of your action plan on ‘Transparency, accountability and trust in policing’. Who will co-Chair this board with the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime; when, and how, will membership be agreed; and how often will it meet? Answer for Delivery board membership The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Multi Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) Review Question No: 2020/4417 Unmesh Desai What are the timescales for MOPAC’s review of MARACs? Answer for Multi Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) Review The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 99

Community Engagement Review Question No: 2020/4418 Unmesh Desai It has been said that MOPAC and the Met’s review of existing community engagement mechanisms will be completed by February 2021. Will this mark the start of a consultation on proposed changes, or will changes begin to be implemented at this point without consultation? What are the timescales for the work MOPAC and the Met will be undertaking with communities to review existing community engagement mechanisms? Answer for Community Engagement Review The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Disproportionality Scrutiny Group Question No: 2020/4419 Unmesh Desai What progress has been made on the establishment of a new Disproportionality Scrutiny Group? Answer for Disproportionality Scrutiny Group The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Safer Schools Officers Question No: 2020/4420 Unmesh Desai What measures do the Met and MOPAC currently have in place to monitor and assess the work of Safer School Officers, in particular to ensure there are no disproportionate impacts for Black children? Answer for Safer Schools Officers The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 100

Community Immersion Project Question No: 2020/4421 Unmesh Desai Please provide details of what the Met’s ‘bespoke local Community Immersion Project’ consists of? Answer for Community Immersion Project The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Contact centre staff Question No: 2020/4422 Unmesh Desai Please advise, by month, the number of Met contact centre 999 and 101 call handlers in each of the last 4 years. Answer for Contact centre staff The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Met contact centre domestic abuse training Question No: 2020/4423 Unmesh Desai Please advise a) what training Met contact centre staff receive on handling domestic abuse calls b) how often this is refreshed c) whether contact centre staff proactively refer callers to domestic abuse services. Answer for Met contact centre domestic abuse training The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Domestic abuse response times Question No: 2020/4424 Unmesh Desai Please advise what percentage of calls received in relation to domestic abuse incidents were responded to by officers within the timeframe the call was marked as i.e. an “I” call being

Page 101

responded to within 15 minutes? Please provide this data for each of the last 4 years if possible. Answer for Domestic abuse response times The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Domestic Abuse calls Question No: 2020/4425 Unmesh Desai Please advise the volume and proportion of emergency calls relating to domestic abuse that were marked as “I”, “S” or other markers by Met contact centre staff in each of the last 4 years. Answer for Domestic Abuse calls The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Domestic abuse social media campaign spending Question No: 2020/4426 Unmesh Desai Please advise how much has been spent on Domestic Abuse social media campaigns by a) the mayor and/or MOPAC and b) the Met in each of the last 4 years. If possible, please also advise the dates these campaigns ran and short descriptions of what they were and who they targeted. Answer for Domestic abuse social media campaign spending The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Domestic abuse ethnic breakdown of victims’ self-reporting Question No: 2020/4427 Unmesh Desai Please can you provide a percentage breakdown of the ethnicity, and nationality where possible, of those who have contacted the Met to report being a victim of domestic abuse in each of the last four years? Answer for Domestic abuse ethnic breakdown of victims’ self-reporting

Page 102

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Action Plan implementation Question No: 2020/4428 Unmesh Desai It was reported in the Evening Standard that the Met was working with you on and “agreed with about 98%” of the Action Plan. What areas, if any, are still to be agreed upon? Answer for Action Plan implementation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Safer Neighbourhood Board communications Question No: 2020/4429 Unmesh Desai How much money has MOPAC put towards raising awareness of the Safer Neighbourhood Boards amongst Londoners, through communications, engagement and advertising, since 2016? Answer for Safer Neighbourhood Board communications The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Recruitment targets Question No: 2020/4430 Unmesh Desai Does your target of 28% of officers being BAME by 2030 include PCSOs and Met Special Constables? Answer for Recruitment targets The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 103

London residency requirement Question No: 2020/4431 Unmesh Desai The Action Plan states that the London residency requirement will be re-introduced for “most” new recruits. What types of recruitment will be exempt from the requirement? Answer for London residency requirement The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Violence Reduction Unit mentoring programme Question No: 2020/4432 Unmesh Desai How many young Londoners have received mentoring since September as a result of the £2.3million funding package introduced through the VRU? Answer for Violence Reduction Unit mentoring programme The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tube Noise [1] Question No: 2020/4434 Andrew Dismore Residents in Fitzrovia are receiving contradictory responses from TfL regarding corrugation on the rails on the Victoria Line around Warren Street. They wrote to me just a few weeks ago to say that they would not be carrying out grinding in the area in the October / November grinding round, because there was no significant corrugation. Now they have just sent an email to a resident stating that: “The engineers have checked the ATMS, and believe that the increase [in noise] is caused by short patches of corrugation which are developing again as a result of the effects of the previous grinding wearing off. My understanding is that the next round of grinding on the Victoria line is Spring 2021. I’ve asked if this could be brought forward, but sadly this isn’t feasible due to the limited capacity within the grinding programme.” What was the wisdom of the decision not to grind the rails here recently, and how does this fit with commitments previously made to tackle to problem? Will you ensure this area is prioritised for grinding, should slots become available? Answer for Tube Noise [1] The Mayor

Page 104

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tube Noise [2] Question No: 2020/4435 Andrew Dismore Residents living between Kentish Town and Tufnell Park report a major increase in tube noise recently. What is the cause and what is the proposed remedy? Answer for Tube Noise [2] The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tube Noise [3] Question No: 2020/4436 Andrew Dismore Residents of Fitzrovia were told that noise from the Victoria Line around Warren Street was not caused by the conditions of the tracks, and so Warren Street was not included in the list of track areas to be ground. It now transpires that there has been corrugation on the rail there, but it will be months before there can be grinding, due to lack of availability of the machine. This is clearly not adequate management of the track or the continuing tube noise issue. Can the grinding of the rails here please be prioritised? Answer for Tube Noise [3] The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

West London Orbital Link Question No: 2020/4437 Andrew Dismore Design work for passive provision for West London Orbital platforms at Brent Cross West station is continuing but funding had not yet been identified for the construction work. Are TfL involved in this scheme, and are they seeking funding for the works? Answer for West London Orbital Link The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 105

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (1) Question No: 2020/4438 Andrew Dismore The recent FBU report ‘Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic fire effluents’1 recommends that respiratory protective equipment is worn at all times whilst firefighting. Will you commit to implementing this for the London Fire Brigade? 1 Fire Brigades Union, ‘Minimising fire fighters’ exposure to toxic effluents’ [Date accessed 23.11.2020] Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (2) Question No: 2020/4439 Andrew Dismore Does the LFB have a fully risk-assessed decontamination procedure? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (3) Question No: 2020/4440 Andrew Dismore When were policies for decontamination of PPE and personnel last updated? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 106

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (4) Question No: 2020/4441 Andrew Dismore Do all fire stations currently have the facilities to allow all firefighters to ‘shower within an hour’ when returning from an incident or following a live fire training exercise? Please provide details of any stations unable to provide this at the moment. Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (5) Question No: 2020/4442 Andrew Dismore Do firefighters currently receive training on the harmful health effects of exposure to toxic fire effluents to enable better practice? How regularly are firefighters expected to attend this training if so? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (6) Question No: 2020/4443 Andrew Dismore What policies are currently in place for the routine care, maintenance, inspection and professional cleaning of PPE? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (6) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (7) Question No: 2020/4444 Andrew Dismore How regularly is PPE professionally cleaned? Has this changed as a result of Covid-19?

Page 107

Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (7) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (8) Question No: 2020/4445 Andrew Dismore Do fire stations currently operate a zoned system? Do all stations have capacity to provide a designated ‘clean’ zone? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (8) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (9) Question No: 2020/4446 Andrew Dismore What policies are currently in place regarding the regular cleaning and decontamination of appliances? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (9) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (10) Question No: 2020/4447 Andrew Dismore The FBU’s report ‘Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents’ states that many of the substances firefighters are exposed to are classified as human carcinogens. In addition, the occurrence of disease and cancer are higher than expected amongst firefighters compared to the general population. How can you reassure firefighters that their health and safety are being prioritised and their wellbeing matters? Answer for Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic effluents (10) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 108

Protecting firefighter health (1) Question No: 2020/4448 Andrew Dismore What indications and early findings are coming from the Imperial College ongoing monitoring to assess the health of firefighters who served at Grenfell? Answer for Protecting firefighter health (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Protecting firefighter health (2) Question No: 2020/4449 Andrew Dismore What is the post Grenfell Imperial College firefighter health study designed to establish? Answer for Protecting firefighter health (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Protecting firefighter health (3) Question No: 2020/4450 Andrew Dismore Does the LFB currently provide health screening as a staff benefit? If yes, what benefits does the health screening provided offer? Answer for Protecting firefighter health (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Albert Embankment and government intervention Question No: 2020/4451 Andrew Dismore What have been the costs to the LFB for the maintenance and security of Albert Embankment as a result of the Government’s call in of the project? Please provide a month by month breakdown starting from June 2020. Answer for Albert Embankment and government intervention

Page 109

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Property Transformation (1) Question No: 2020/4452 Andrew Dismore The Director of Corporate Services indicated recently that visits to fire stations were being undertaken to improve the way that stations are being used1. How regularly do these visits take place? 1 London.gov, ‘Appendix 2: London Assembly Budget and Performance Committee, 22nd September 2020’ [Date accessed 24.11.2020] Answer for Property Transformation (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Property Transformation (2) Question No: 2020/4453 Andrew Dismore How have the visits improved the ways in which fire stations are used? What efficiencies have been found? Answer for Property Transformation (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Property Transformation (3) Question No: 2020/4454 Andrew Dismore Have the changes made led to policy change or vice versa? Answer for Property Transformation (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 110

Property Transformation (4) Question No: 2020/4455 Andrew Dismore How much money has property transformation allowed LFB to reinvest back into the Brigade? Where has this money been reinvested? Answer for Property Transformation (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Government and EWS1s Question No: 2020/4456 Andrew Dismore At People’s Question Time you stated you were awaiting a response from Government to a letter you had written on the issue of EWS1 forms. Have you received this? If so what actions have been promised and will you publish the correspondence? Answer for Government and EWS1s The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LFB and LAS [1] Question No: 2020/4457 Andrew Dismore Have the costs incurred by LFB due to supporting the work of LAS during the Covid-19 pandemic now been reimbursed? If so, how much has been paid; and if not, how much is due? Answer for LFB and LAS [1] The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LFB and LAS [2] Question No: 2020/4458 Andrew Dismore What is the monthly cost of seconding firefighters to LAS; and is there agreement with LAS for regular reimbursement of this cost?

Page 111

Answer for LFB and LAS [2] The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LFB and LAS [3] Question No: 2020/4459 Andrew Dismore What changes in arrangements such as shift patterns have been made to seconding firefighters to LAS; and how many are currently being seconded? Answer for LFB and LAS [3] The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Government intervention on EWS1s (1) Question No: 2020/4460 Andrew Dismore The Government recently announced measures to address the EWS1 crisis1. Does the rush to train 2000 assessors in 6 months- compared to the standard 4-5 years RICS have stated is necessary for training- risk leaving EWS1 forms being completed by inexperienced and undertrained assessors? 1 ‘Government steps in to help homeowners caught up in ‘EWS1’ process’ [Date accessed 24.11.20] Answer for Government intervention on EWS1s (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Government intervention on EWS1s (2) Question No: 2020/4461 Andrew Dismore With the Government training up new EWS1 assessors before addressing the issue of professional indemnity insurance, do you believe they understand how to address safety in London’s built environment? Government intervention on EWS1s (2)

Page 112

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I was very disappointed with the absence of an announcement from the Government on the ongoing professional indemnity issues. Until the Government unlocks the Professional Indemnity Insurance market, the wider system will remain broken. Put simply, those qualified to carry out remedial works essential to addressing this crisis must also have access to sufficient cover. The prolonged lack of a comprehensive national solution continues to take a heavy toll on many thousands of Londoners – both financially and in terms of their wellbeing. That is why I wrote to the Secretary of State in September regarding EWS1, setting out five urgent steps he must take to solve this issue for both leaseholders and the housing market. I am still yet to receive a response, but their recent announcement will not work in isolation. I will keep pressing for a properly integrated package of measures that fixes the problem once and for all.

Machine Learning and LFB Question No: 2020/4462 Andrew Dismore How is artificial intelligence being used to enhance the work of LFB? Answer for Machine Learning and LFB The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LFB’s Fire Safety Department (1) Question No: 2020/4463 Andrew Dismore Has LFB’s fire safety department increased in size either in officer numbers or in workload since 2017? Please give staffing numbers and ranks for each year from 2017 to date. Answer for LFB’s Fire Safety Department (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 113

LFB’s Fire Safety Department (2) Question No: 2020/4464 Andrew Dismore Has the cost of running the LFB’s fire safety department increased since 2017? Answer for LFB’s Fire Safety Department (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Filling fire safety posts (1) Question No: 2020/4465 Andrew Dismore There has been a longstanding arrangement that an ARA/specialist rank would be paid to take a junior officer to the rank above in recognition of additional work they are doing because operations officers would need to do operations on top of fire safety work. Why was this not offered for the c 20 fire safety posts needing to be filled? Answer for Filling fire safety posts (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Filling fire safety posts (2) Question No: 2020/4466 Andrew Dismore How many fire safety posts, and in which ranks, are currently vacant; and what steps are being taken to fill them? Answer for Filling fire safety posts (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 114

Covid and self-isolation of firefighters Question No: 2020/4467 Andrew Dismore There are different interpretations by different officers on when firefighters should self- isolate due to Covid 19, not following NHS or PHE advice. Will you ensure that this advice is applied consistently across LFB? Answer for Covid and self-isolation of firefighters The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Training on PN633 Question No: 2020/4468 Andrew Dismore What progress is being made towards an agreement with the FBU over training on PN633? Answer for Training on PN633 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Applications to the non-ACM cladding fund Question No: 2020/4469 Andrew Dismore How many applications have been made to date to the non-ACM fund under the Building Safety Programme for remediation of buildings in London? Applications to the non-ACM cladding fund The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG) closed the registration process for the Building Safety Fund on 31 July 2020. The GLA is a delivery partner in administering the fund for London. MHCLG publishes registration statistics for the Building Safety Fund which is available on its website: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/remediation-of-non-acm-buildings. As of 9 December 2020, MHCLG had passed 151 registrations to the GLA.

Page 115

Accelerating the removal of ACM cladding Question No: 2020/4470 Andrew Dismore What action is your Building Safety Team taking to accelerate progress in removing dangerous cladding from all buildings over 18 metres in London? Accelerating the removal of ACM cladding The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The GLA is a delivery partner for three programmes that accelerate the remediation of unsafe buildings over 18 metres in London. In particular, my team has worked closely with central Government and Homes England (delivery partner for buildings outside of London) to streamline the Private Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund and the Building Safety Fund such that applications can be progressed at pace. For example, two GLA officers recently provided direct support to MHCLG to help accelerate the Building Safety Fund registration process.

The impact of Covid-19 of LFB’s operational response Question No: 2020/4471 Andrew Dismore What impact has COVID-19 had on the operational response of the London Fire Brigade, including the second lockdown? Answer for The impact of Covid-19 of LFB’s operational response The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LFB cost mitigation and Covid-19 Question No: 2020/4472 Andrew Dismore What action has been taken to mitigate costs incurred by the London Fire Brigade due to the pandemic? Answer for LFB cost mitigation and Covid-19 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 116

LFB use of reserves Question No: 2020/4473 Andrew Dismore London Fire Brigade are proposing to use £12.1million of reserves this year in order to address overspend within the budget. How much has Covid-19 impacted on the finances of the Brigade and necessitated the use of reserves? Answer for LFB use of reserves The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Electric vehicle charging points and LFB (1) Question No: 2020/4474 Andrew Dismore Which fire stations currently offer electric vehicle charging points for public use? Answer for Electric vehicle charging points and LFB (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Electric vehicle charging points and LFB (2) Question No: 2020/4475 Andrew Dismore Has there been any policy change regarding the public use of electric vehicle charging points at fire stations? Please provide details if so. Answer for Electric vehicle charging points and LFB (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Electric vehicle charging points and LFB (3) Question No: 2020/4476 Andrew Dismore Have any fire stations removed public access to electric vehicle charging points in the last year? If so please provide details of which stations and the reasons why public access has been changed.

Page 117

Answer for Electric vehicle charging points and LFB (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Spending Review (1) Question No: 2020/4477 Len Duvall OBE What do you consider to be the key points and omissions of the Spending Review in terms of its impact on London? Answer for Spending Review (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Spending Review (2) Question No: 2020/4478 Len Duvall OBE What impact will the Government’s commitment to cover 75% of council tax and business rates income have on the GLA and functional bodies? Answer for Spending Review (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Spending Review (3) Question No: 2020/4479 Len Duvall OBE What impact will the Government’s commitment to cover 75% of council tax and business rates income have on local authorities across London? Answer for Spending Review (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 118

Spending Review (4) Question No: 2020/4480 Len Duvall OBE Why were combined authorities and the GLA excluded from the third and fourth tranches of the Government’s emergency Covid-19 support and do you support the Government’s decision to do so? Answer for Spending Review (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Discretionary Mayoral Income Spent on Metropolitan Police Service Question No: 2020/4481 Len Duvall OBE How much funding over which the Mayoralty has direct control (i.e. council tax, business rates, GLA reserves and other GLA income excluding central government grants) was spent on MOPAC in 2015/16 and how much was spent in 2019/20? Answer for Discretionary Mayoral Income Spent on Metropolitan Police Service The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Discretionary Mayoral Income Spent on London Fire Brigade Question No: 2020/4482 Len Duvall OBE How much funding over which the Mayoralty has direct control (i.e. council tax, business rates, GLA reserves and other GLA income excluding central government grants) was spent on the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority in 2015/16 and how much was spent on the London Fire Commissioner 2019/20? Answer for Discretionary Mayoral Income Spent on London Fire Brigade The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 119

Use-class order changes in London Question No: 2020/4485 Nicky Gavron Changes to the E use-class order, which amalgamates; shops, financial and professional services, business, non-residential institutions, and leisure into one use-class came into effect from the 1st of September 2020. How are you monitoring the impact of these changes to highstreets in London? Use-class order changes in London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 This is an important issue and one which I am concerned about. Since changes of use within the new Use Class E do not require planning permission, however, it will not be possible to monitor changes of use within this new Use Class through the London Development Database. I intend instead to monitor the impact of new Use Class E on high streets through the London town centre health check which will be reliant upon, and subject to, third party data sources. The town centre health check provides periodic snapshots of the balance of uses in town centres, including shops, financial and professional services, business, non- residential institutions and leisure. This will inform our ongoing work with boroughs and other stakeholders to understand the impacts of the new Use Class E and to consider appropriate and feasible mitigations.

Permitted development rights Question No: 2020/4486 Nicky Gavron Permitted development rights were introduced into London Central Activity Zone in May 2019. Have you been monitoring the conversion of central London offices into residential buildings via permitted development rights? if so, how many conversions have you seen since then? Answer for Permitted development rights The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Loneliness over Christmas Question No: 2020/4487 Nicky Gavron Given that many more older people will spend Christmas alone this year, what actions are you taking directly or indirectly though other organisations to combat this?

Page 120

Loneliness over Christmas The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 No one should have to feel lonely this Christmas. Loneliness can affect all Londoners and this Christmas will be particularly hard for many. To help tackle loneliness this winter I provided £1.4 million to wave 4 of the London Community Response Fund. This will support organisations which exist to reduce social isolation and promote good mental health and wellbeing. My Thrive LDN initiative has developed an article on staying well and connected during Christmas and will be dispatching 113,000 wellbeing packs through TfL and charity partners. I am supporting the Jo Cox Foundation’s Great Winter Get Together and encouraging all Londoners to stay connected, whether that’s by delivering a gift to a neighbour, hosting a virtual gathering, reaching out to others who may be lonely or volunteering in your local community.

Child-friendly London (1) Question No: 2020/4488 Nicky Gavron During the most recent lockdown, children’s playgrounds have remained opened. What have you been doing to ensure that these have been kept safe? Child-friendly London (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 During these difficult times it is beneficial for children to have a place to play outdoors for their health, development and wellbeing. It is the responsibility of the Local Authorities or community organisations running play spaces to ensure that they comply with the relevant regulations. The government has published guidance for the owners and operators responsible for outdoor playgrounds during this period at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance- for-managing-playgrounds-and-outdoor-gyms/covid-19-guidance-for-managing- playgrounds-and-outdoor-gyms My teams continue to provide guidance and the latest coronavirus updates for London. These are available at https://www.london.gov.uk/coronavirus.

Page 121

Child-friendly London (2) Question No: 2020/4489 Nicky Gavron What steps will you be taking to ensure that all children and young people will have locally accessible outdoor space to play? Answer for Child-friendly London (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Parks and Recreation Space (1) Question No: 2020/4490 Nicky Gavron Lockdown has demonstrated the need for parks and recreation grounds. What is your assessment of opportunities for creating new parks of all sizes? Parks and Recreation Space (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Given the availability and competing pressures on land in London, there are very few opportunities to create large areas of new public open space based on traditional parks and green spaces. To address this challenge and make the city greener my London Plan policies G1, G4 and G5 set out how boroughs should protect, plan and integrate green infrastructure and open space into new development. This requires developers to consider how they can provide publicly accessible open space, particularly in areas of deficiency, and apply an Urban Greening Factor (UGF). The UGF requires greening to be incorporated into new development to deliver health and environmental benefits. To support the implementation of these policies, Green Infrastructure Strategy Guidance will be published to help boroughs identify opportunities for new and enhanced green infrastructure, including greening the public realm. My Grow Back Greener Fund has also recently awarded almost £700,000 to 34 local community greening projects to create and improve at least six hectares of public open space, prioritising projects in areas of deprivation and with poor access to green space. This builds on the £13 million I have invested since 2016 which has supported over 250 projects to create and improve nearly 500 hectares of green space, including 2 new publicly accessible woodlands in London’s greenbelt.

Page 122

Parks and Recreation Space (2) Question No: 2020/4491 Nicky Gavron Sports teams are facing financial pressures as a result of the pandemic. Do you envision pitches being lost to developers if the clubs go out of business, and what can you do about it? Parks and Recreation Space (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The role of Sports now is more important than ever in supporting London’s recovery. I signed the London Funders joint statement pledging support to civil society groups affected by COVID-19. I contributed £7.6 million to the London Community Response Fund with £450,000 dedicated to sports. As part of this pledge, my Sports team adapted their mid-term strategic priorities to focus on supporting the sector, relieving social isolation and improving Londoners’ mental wellbeing. My investment in Community Sport is revenue based and funds grassroots organisations under my £8.8m programme, Sport Unites. I am currently working with officers to scope future investment in community sport. My London Plan Policy S5 sets out protections to prevent any net loss of sporting facilities, except where there is a surplus as identified by a needs assessment. Many existing pitches are located on open space and may have additional protection through Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land or other designations.

Vaccination Priority Question No: 2020/4493 Joanne McCartney Will you lobby the Government to ensure that domiciliary care workers are prioritised for COVID vaccinations – they are not currently in the priority groups, but are key frontline workers moving from home to home? Answer for Vaccination Priority The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 123

Brexit and London Question No: 2020/4494 Joanne McCartney What plans do you have to ensure that London plays a leading role in Europe following Brexit? Brexit and London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I’m optimistic that the historic bonds established between London and other European cities will endure. There are many common interests we can unite around, and challenges we must meet together; such as tackling air pollution, promoting equality, fighting terrorism and striving against the politics of division that we see on the rise across Europe. Earlier this month, I spoke at the EU Committee of the Regions to reinforce my commitment to engage with European city leaders in pursuit of those goals. I will ensure that London remains a partner for EU institutions and European cities, regions and nations by sharing our ideas and expertise both bilaterally and through international networks. My international promotion agency London & Partners will continue banging the drum for London as a world leading place to do business, study, visit and invest, with L&P representatives based in Paris and Berlin dedicated to promoting these opportunities.

Supporting Young People Jobs & Training (1) Question No: 2020/4495 Joanne McCartney What can young Londoners in Enfield & Haringey expect from you in terms of training and job support during this extremely difficult time? Answer for Supporting Young People Jobs & Training (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Supporting Young People Jobs & Training (2) Question No: 2020/4496 Joanne McCartney In order to deal with the increasing need for training and job support for young Londoners are you asking the Government for further resources; if so, what? Answer for Supporting Young People Jobs & Training (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 124

Officers are drafting a response

Drainage Problems on Tottenham High Road Question No: 2020/4497 Joanne McCartney There is regular water pooling, presumably due to poor drainage, along Tottenham High Road affecting bus lanes and pedestrians who have difficulty crossing the road – residents have complained on numerous occasions - can this please be fully investigated and finally resolved? Drainage Problems on Tottenham High Road The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Transport for London (TfL) has been working with its contractors to resolve the issues on Tottenham High Road. In December 2019 and January 2020 TfL’s contractors carried out significant work at the location to resolve the problems that had previously been highlighted by local residents. This work included: • Relining • Excavation and repair to collapses • Additional CCTV surveying • Patch line repairs each patch repair • New line installation • Mass Root cutting • Traffic Management • Additional De-silting • New connections These works resolved the issues that had previously been reported by local residents and issues that TfL’s inspections had identified. Recently some issues of water pooling have been reported following periods of heavy rain. These will be addressed during TfL’s regular yearly cyclical maintenance work, carried out in this location every 12 months, which is due to begin in this area imminently. Any issues that are found will be noted and acted upon to make sure that all drainage in the area is working as it should be.

Page 125

Edmonton Incinerator Question No: 2020/4498 Joanne McCartney There is growing concern locally in Edmonton about North London Waste Authority’s plans for Edmonton Eco-Park, in particular the new incinerator. Planning approval was given by the Secretary of State, supported by your predecessor. Would you ask the Government, given their now stated commitment to tackle the climate crisis and reduce carbon emissions, to review this planning approval? Edmonton Incinerator The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 In November 2019 there was an unsuccessful attempt by a local campaign group to seek a judicial review of the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy’s decision to make the Development Consent Order for the North London Heat and Power Generating Station. It is no longer possible to bring any further challenge to this decision as the time period for doing so has expired. I have been clear with the Government that London is facing a climate emergency and does not need any further waste incinerator capacity to manage the city’s non-recyclable waste. I am committed to London becoming net zero carbon by 2030 but we also need Government to play its part and ensure its decision-making is in line with tackling the climate emergency. In these circumstances, I am now focused on making sure that this facility, and London’s other incinerators minimise their environmental impact by only managing truly non- recyclable waste, maximising both the heat and electricity generated, and operating to the most stringent air quality standards possible. One of the projects funded by my recently announced Green New Deal Fund will support the development of a low carbon heat network in Enfield that will capture waste heat from the Edmonton facility and supply affordable ‘near zero carbon’ heating to homes and businesses in the London borough of Enfield whilst making at least 20MW of heat available in the network for the boroughs of Haringey and Hackney.

ULEZ Information Campaign Question No: 2020/4499 Joanne McCartney What further plans do you/TfL have to alert Londoners, who are not yet aware, of the coming introduction of the ULEZ? Answer for ULEZ Information Campaign The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 126

ULEZ Information in Car Dealerships Question No: 2020/4500 Joanne McCartney Has any work taken place with car dealerships to make sure that they don’t sell non- compliant vehicles, or at least inform buyers that they are buying a non-compliant ULEZ vehicle? Answer for ULEZ Information in Car Dealerships The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Piccadilly Line Signalling upgrade Question No: 2020/4501 Joanne McCartney Did the Government’s Spending Review 2020 offer any hope of investment in the much needed Piccadilly Line signalling upgrade? Whilst the new Piccadilly Line trains that will be rolled out from 2023 will increase capacity by around 12%, this signalling upgrade will increase capacity by 60% thereby transforming the service for my residents in Enfield & Haringey. Answer for Piccadilly Line Signalling upgrade The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Overground Capacity Question No: 2020/4502 Joanne McCartney Is it possible for you to provide the capacity data – including times of day and times of the year – for each London Overground line? Answer for London Overground Capacity The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 127

Platform Capacity at Liverpool Street (1) Question No: 2020/4503 Joanne McCartney What plans are there to re-allocate platform space at Liverpool Street once Crossrail has opened? Platform Capacity at Liverpool Street (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Some Elizabeth line services will continue to use two of the existing Liverpool Street station platforms during peak periods once the full Crossrail network opens, and as such any potential reallocation of platform space is only possible during off peak periods. Transport for London and other affected operators are working with Network Rail (as owners of the infrastructure concerned) to explore how best to exploit any opportunities created by the opening of Crossrail at Liverpool Street station. This process is expected to conclude in summer 2021.

Platform Capacity at Liverpool Street (2) Question No: 2020/4504 Joanne McCartney Will platform space at Liverpool Street be allocated to allow extra services on the Enfield Town/Cheshunt London Overground service? Platform Capacity at Liverpool Street (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 It is highly unlikely that platform capacity can be reallocated at Liverpool Street to support the objective of providing additional London Overground services on the Enfield Town and Cheshunt routes. Although platforms 16 and 17 at Liverpool Street are not planned to be used during off-peak periods once the full Crossrail network has opened, they cannot be used directly by London Overground services because they are on the wrong side of the station. Opportunities for Greater Anglia services to use platforms 16 and 17 are also severely limited as the platforms are shorter than the trains normally deployed by Greater Anglia during off peak periods. This severely limits the potential for moving Greater Anglia services to free up platform capacity that could then be used by London Overground services. Any allocation of platform space at Liverpool Street would ultimately be determined in line with the processes governing access to the rail network, as defined by the Network Code. Please also these my response to Mayors Question 2020/4503.

Page 128

Face Covering Enforcement Question No: 2020/4505 Joanne McCartney Is it possible for you to provide a borough by borough breakdown of TfL enforcement action regarding passengers who were not wearing a face covering on public transport? Answer for Face Covering Enforcement The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Government’s Building Safety Fund Delay Question No: 2020/4506 Joanne McCartney My constituents who are leaseholders and residents living in ‘The Pavillions’ (Crane Heights, Merlin Heights, Egret Heights, Kingfisher Heights, Lapwing Heights and Eagle Heights) in Tottenham, N17 have raised concerns regarding delays by the Government’s Building Safety Fund (BSF). Although an application was made on time to the BSF their freeholder, Lee Valley Estates, and Managing Agent, Pinnacle, have reported concern at the lack of engagement from the BSF around completion of the application process. Can you make representations to Government about this matter? Government’s Building Safety Fund Delay The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Building owners wishing to apply for funding from the Building Safety Fund (BSF) must first register with the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) who confirm building eligibility for the Fund. Once eligibility is confirmed these buildings are passed over to the GLA, who act as delivery partner in London, and building owners can proceed with their full application. My team are aware of delays in passing eligible buildings over to the GLA and concerns have been raised with MHCLG about these issues. Staff from the GLA’s building safety team have also been deployed to assist MHCLG in order to speed up the process. This is having a positive impact and that buildings are now being passed over to the GLA more rapidly.

Oyster weekly cap Question No: 2020/4508 Alison Moore Please update me on TfL’s attempts to introduce weekly capping for Oyster customers on all rail services in London. Answer for Oyster weekly cap

Page 129

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Transport for London Consulting Question No: 2020/4509 Alison Moore Following MQ 2020/0638 can you provide costs and revenue figures for TfL Consulting? Please break down by financial year from 2018/19 onwards. Please provide actual figures for 2018/19 to 2019/20 and estimated figures for 2020/21 and the subsequent business plan years. Answer for Transport for London Consulting The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Spending on Cycling Question No: 2020/4510 Alison Moore Following MQ 2020/0639 can you provide figures for 2020/21 and 2021/22 now a financial settlement with Government has been agreed? Answer for Spending on Cycling The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail Funding (1) Question No: 2020/4511 Alison Moore What specific representations have you made to the Government to secure and agree a funding deal for Crossrail? Answer for Crossrail Funding (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 130

Crossrail Funding (2) Question No: 2020/4512 Alison Moore What is your latest estimate of the expected Crossrail completion date? Answer for Crossrail Funding (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

E-Scooter Trial Question No: 2020/4513 Alison Moore What criteria will you use to select the three e-scooter rental providers that will participate in the rental e-scooters trial due to start next year, and under what conditions will they be able to operate? E-Scooter Trial The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 On 17 November 2020, Transport for London (TfL) and London Councils launched the procurement process to select up to three operators for a multi-borough London rental e- scooter trial. Safety is TfL’s top priority, and the purpose of taking a collaborative approach between TfL, London Councils and the boroughs is to ensure consistent safety standards that are as high as possible.

Operators will be assessed on their ability to meet strict safety requirements and high operating standards, with a focus on safety, maintenance, rider education, parking, environmental impacts and inclusion, as well as their ability to mobilise and work with a range of partners and stakeholders. Selected operators will be subject to regular ongoing monitoring throughout the trial, and operations will be able to be suspended if necessary.

Homeless Young People (1) Question No: 2020/4515 Murad Qureshi The latest data on rough sleeping in London covering July to September shows that 18-25- year olds are the only age group with more people rough sleeping this year than in the

Page 131

same period in 2019. In fact, it shows a 48% increase in the numbers, from 248 to 366. Why do you think there has been an increase in rough sleeping in this age group? Homeless Young People (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Young people have been hit particularly hard by the COVID pandemic, with the instability, lack of opportunities and unstable employment leading hundreds into homelessness for the first time. In addition, homeless young people often face insecure accommodation options such as sofa surfing with friends and travelling on night buses etc, sometimes interspersed with short periods of rough sleeping. Understandably, during the pandemic sofa surfing has not been possible, forcing many more young people to sleep rough, or to sleep rough for longer periods than previously. I am concerned that as temporary protections for renters come to an end, along with the end of the furlough scheme next year, more young people will find themselves pushed onto the streets. I have been lobbying ministers to put in place permanent reforms to the private rented sector, and to increase benefits available through the welfare system to help protect renters and prevent more young people becoming homeless.

Homeless Young People (2) Question No: 2020/4516 Murad Qureshi David Eastwood, the GLA’s Rough Sleeping Lead said at last month’s Housing Committee that DePaul was running a dedicated service for under‑25s and under‑35s at the hotel provision in Wandsworth. Can you provide some more details on what this dedicated service looks like and what the early results are? Homeless Young People (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 This service, launched on 9 November 2020, supports rough sleepers aged 18 to 34. It is operating within a dedicated young people’s floor of a GLA-procured hotel in Wandsworth, where people referred to the Mayor’s new ‘triage hubs’ can be accommodated. The hubs provides assessment and support for those new to the street. Depaul is providing on-site support five days a week, comprehensively assessing clients’ needs, and finding safe, affordable longer-term accommodation, with ongoing support if required. Depaul has access to a move-on and resettlement budget to cover deposits and/or rent in advance for clients moving into the private rented sector. The service has so far supported 24 young people (3 aged under 25, and 21 aged under 35), four of whom have already moved on into longer-term accommodation. Nine have also been supported to engage with services relating to mental health, drugs and alcohol, and employment education and training to date.

Page 132

Homeless Young People (3) Question No: 2020/4517 Murad Qureshi Do you feel a pan-London youth homelessness strategy is needed, given there is a relatively small number of young rough sleepers in some boroughs, so it is a challenge for those boroughs to provide specialist services? Homeless Young People (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Specifically in relation to young people sleeping rough, as I highlighted in my response to the recent Mayor’s Question 2020/3829, I tasked a sub-group of my Life Off the Streets taskforce to explore the scale and nature of rough sleeping among young people and solutions needed across London. The COVID crisis has delayed progress with some of this work, understandably, but I will work with the sub-group as it follows through its plans in due course. Future work will include taking on board learning from the specialist service for young people I recently commissioned in future commissioning of rough sleeping services. A wider youth homelessness strategy would need to be driven by local authorities, given their statutory obligations to young people facing or experiencing homelessness. London boroughs do already collaborate in their responses to youth homelessness, with London Councils funding the London Youth Gateway. This partnership between New Horizon Youth Centre, [Depaul](http://www.londonyouthgateway.org.uk/partners/alone-in- london/ " Alone in London"), Shelter and LGBT Jigsaw provides advice and support for young people who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless.

Homeless Young People (4) Question No: 2020/4518 Murad Qureshi What progress has been made to distribute cold weather funding to local authorities this winter, and will it be enough to meet demand? Homeless Young People (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 MHCLG rather than the GLA distributes cold weather funding to local authorities. With COVID restrictions on communal sleeping, the amount of winter night shelter provision available is far lower than usual. That is why I am lobbying the Government to meet the estimated £24m funding gap to ensure that there is COVID-safe accommodation for all rough sleepers this winter. As usual, this winter the GLA is triggering and co-ordinating Severe Weather Emergency Protocol (SWEP) and provides over-flow accommodation when borough provision is full.

Page 133

Homeless Young People (5) Question No: 2020/4519 Murad Qureshi With a 40% increase in under-25s seen sleeping rough compared to the same period last year and young people now making up a record high proportion of rough sleepers, what steps are you taking to ensure access to age-appropriate accommodation and support for young people facing homelessness in the capital this Winter, particularly those aged 16-25? Homeless Young People (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Local authorities have a statutory obligation to assist young people facing or experiencing homelessness, with particular duties to those aged 16 and 17 or leaving local authority care. Very sadly, some young people do still end up on the streets and I am very concerned by the recent increase in their numbers. There are a range of factors here. We know young people have been hard hit by the economic impacts of COVID-19. Those who are non-UK nationals may not be entitled to help from local authorities under the homelessness legislation. Common arrangements, whereby young people stay with family or friends, broke down during lockdown. In my response to the recent Mayor’s Question 2020/3829, I reported that we worked with charities to provide safe accommodation to over 150 people aged under 25 as part of the ‘Everyone In’ response to rough sleepers. I also explained the work I am doing to ensure young people who have recently started sleeping rough receive specialist support. In recognition of the impact the Covid-19 pandemic is having on young people, and the rise in youth homelessness, this year my winter rough sleeping fundraising campaign will raise money for four youth homelessness charities. The generosity of Londoners is hugely appreciated and has raised hundreds of thousands of pounds in previous years. However, it is vital that the Government steps up and provides the additional funding we need to help rough sleepers this winter.

Homeless Young People (6) Question No: 2020/4520 Murad Qureshi What steps are you taking to support the development of high-quality, affordable and sustainable move-on accommodation for young people facing homelessness in London, and for those unable to afford accommodation in the private rental market? Answer for Homeless Young People (6) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 134

Housing Need in London Question No: 2020/4521 Murad Qureshi Do you believe the Government should rethink its proposed formula to determine housing need in local authorities across England? Answer for Housing Need in London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Mayor opens City Hall to homeless Londoners on Christmas Eve Question No: 2020/4522 Murad Qureshi Last Christmas, the Mayor welcomed people experiencing homelessness to City Hall for a meal and services such as haircuts and optical checks. Many such events usually happen across London at Christmas, delivered by charities and community groups. What could be done to galvanise some of the Christmas community spirit to support rough sleepers, despite restrictions expected to be in place this Christmas? Mayor opens City Hall to homeless Londoners on Christmas Eve The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 All rough sleepers accommodated in the GLA-procured hotels over the festive period will be receiving a traditional Christmas lunch on Christmas Day. Many charities and community groups are continuing to provide key services to help people throughout the pandemic and the Christmas period, and will be seeking to celebrate the festive season with their clients in a COVID-secure way.

London Plan Annual Monitoring Report Question No: 2020/4523 Murad Qureshi When will you publish the sixteenth London Plan Annual Monitoring Report? London Plan Annual Monitoring Report The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I will be publishing the London Plan Annual Monitoring Report early in the new year.

Page 135

Affordable Homes Programme 2016-2023 Question No: 2020/4524 Murad Qureshi Now that the End date for project starts on site has moved from March 2022 to March 2023 can you confirm what the new a) End date for project completions on site (SPs and CME) and b) End date for project completions on site (LTSPs) are? Affordable Homes Programme 2016-2023 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 In the AHP 2021-2026 programme the end date for project completions on site for SPs and CME is 31 March 2028 and for LTSPs is 31 March 2029.

Edgware Road Housing Zone update Question No: 2020/4525 Murad Qureshi How much of the indicative GLA funding allocation; total number of homes; total number of affordable homes and total number of construction jobs have been delivered so far in the Edgware Road Housing Zone? Edgware Road Housing Zone update The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 In February 2017, £2million recoverable grant was allocated to Westminster for infrastructure works (utility diversions) required to unlock two key sites and provide a total of 158 new homes for Londoners. Lisson Arches will provide 44 sheltered homes for Affordable Rent and 14 homes for private sale with restricted leases for over-55s. The enabling works commenced in July 2020 and are nearing completion which should enable construction of the new homes to start as expected early in the New Year and complete by March 2023. Lisson Grove will provide 100 homes including 35 affordable homes (31 Intermediate and 4 Social Rent) and 65 for private sale. This scheme is now expected to start in December 2025. The GLA does not monitor the number of construction jobs created by interventions funded in Housing Zones.

Page 136

Time for International Baccalaureate? Question No: 2020/4526 Murad Qureshi With another summer likely to be without “A” Level exams and with no fall back on coursework since 2010, it is not time to promote the International Baccalaureate for London’s schools? Time for International Baccalaureate? The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The International Baccalaureate is a valuable qualification and I hope it continues to be offered in state sector schools in London. It is schools, with parents and students, who are best placed to determine the qualifications for which their students are entered, based on the needs of their pupils and the resources available. The Government must ensure that the exams chaos of the past summer is not repeated, and that pupils’ qualifications are a true reflection of their ability and effort

Rail Clear Air Zone Question No: 2020/4527 Murad Qureshi The first rail Clear Air Zone was created around Marylebone station in 2018. When can we expect further rail Clear Air Zones to be created around other London terminus rail stations? Answer for Rail Clear Air Zone The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Rerouting the 414 & social distancing on No.6 Question No: 2020/4528 Murad Qureshi Is stopping the No.414 bus service from Marble Arch to Maida Vale advisable when this would result in the doubling up of passengers on the No.6 bus service during the COVID-19 era (and beyond), making it difficult to maintain social distancing which will have an adverse health impact? Rerouting the 414 & social distancing on No.6 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 137

TfL is reviewing the feedback from the recent public consultation on these proposals and the results will be published in early 2021. No decision has yet been taken. Any changes would not take place until later in 2021. The rationale for the change is that the section of route is also covered by route 6, which runs 8 buses per hour and provides sufficient capacity. Therefore, resources could be released to meet customer requirements elsewhere.

Paddington Green Question No: 2020/4529 Murad Qureshi Thank you for the letter of the 30th of October 2020 confirming the sale of the Police Station. Can you please confirm the sale price of Paddington Green Police Station and any conditions of sale? Answer for Paddington Green The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Bridges repair costs since 2010 Question No: 2020/4530 Murad Qureshi How much has it cost to repair and renovate each London bridge that has been repaired since 2010? And who has paid for it and in what proportion for each case? Answer for London Bridges repair costs since 2010 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Air Pollution in Second Lockdown Question No: 2020/4531 Murad Qureshi With air pollution reductions less impressive during the second European lockdown, what lessons are there for London? Air Pollution in Second Lockdown The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 138

The changes in traffic across London was one of the reasons why I have reintroduced the ULEZ and the Congestion Charge, which were temporarily suspended in March during the first lockdown, to facilitate the movement of London’s critical workers and freight vehicles, whose journeys were essential to the early response to the coronavirus pandemic. At the same time, my Streetspace Plans have created more space for walking and cycling across London. The need for a cleaner, greener London has never been more apparent - we cannot afford to replace one public health crisis with another. Emerging evidence of the association between air pollution and the most severe effects of COVID-19 make these schemes even more essential to protect Londoners’ health. These schemes reduce congestion and pollution and help tackle the climate emergency.

Children’s mental health Question No: 2020/4533 Onkar Sahota Research is beginning to show that children’s mental health has suffered greatly during the pandemic. Can you provide support to children in London? Answer for Children’s mental health The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

University Covid testing Question No: 2020/4534 Onkar Sahota The Government’s plan to test all students before they leave university for Christmas was thrown into question after unions raised “grave concerns” about the accuracy of the Covid- 19 tests being used and warned that the mass evacuation of students was a “recipe for chaos”. Are you concerned about this causing a spike as students return to London? Answer for University Covid testing The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 139

Testing inaccuracies Question No: 2020/4535 Onkar Sahota Government-backed assessments carried out by Public Health England and the University of Oxford suggests the lateral flow rapid tests may miss as many as half of Covid-19 cases, depending on who is using them. The study found that the sensitivity of the test dropped from 79% to 58% when it was used by self-trained members of the public as opposed to laboratory scientists. Are you worried about testing accuracy for Londoners if rapid testing is made more widely available? Answer for Testing inaccuracies The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

School children infection rate Question No: 2020/4536 Onkar Sahota The number of school-age children with coronavirus has risen “significantly” in the second wave compared with the first, according to the Government’s scientific advisers. How can you as Mayor encourage safe practices and distancing in schools? School children infection rate The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 We have repeatedly asked for more testing in our worst hit boroughs to help tackle the spread of the virus and I have discussed our concerns with the Health Secretary, including the particularly concerning rise in cases in secondary school children. It’s important that the Government is providing much-needed testing support before the Christmas break for secondary school students in the seven north east London boroughs where there are worrying rises on infection rates. I welcome the announcement from the Secretary of State for Education on 15 December that mass weekly testing will be introduced in January for all secondary schools. It is essential that the Government provides the capital’s schools and colleges with the resources to quickly mobilise and roll out testing when children return after the Christmas holidays. It is essential that Londoners continue to follow the rules to reduce the spread of the virus. Within the school, face coverings should be worn by adults and pupils in secondary schools when moving around the school, such as in corridors and communal areas where social distancing is difficult to maintain. More guidance to pupils and parents is provided on london.gov.uk https://www.london.gov.uk/coronavirus/back-school-and-college, through fortnightly Healthy Schools London briefings to borough leads and targeted messaging

Page 140

encouraging safe behaviours to young Londoners from 13 years old upwards on my social media platforms.

London’s dirty air increases risk of catching Covid-19 Question No: 2020/4537 Onkar Sahota Research by Queen Mary University has found that London’s dirty air increases risk of catching Covid-19. What steps are you taking to urgently tackle air quality in light of the pandemic? London’s dirty air increases risk of catching Covid-19 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the way air pollution affects health; not only is there growing evidence of a potential link between exposure and the severity of the illness but long term exposure to high levels of air pollution has long been known to contribute to the underlying conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, that exacerbate COVID-19 symptoms. The GLA is carefully monitoring this field of research as it evolves, and I will continue to be led by the best available science. I am taking many steps to tackle air quality in London. My Streetspace for London scheme is encouraging people to walk, cycle or scoot more whilst discouraging an increase in car use in London. The expansion of the ULEZ in October 2021 out to the North and South Circular roads. TfL is leading by example ensuring that its buses meet the cleanest Euro VI standard and there are now more than 3,700 zero emission capable taxis on London’s streets. Additionally, I have supported the delivery of over 289 rapid charge points and over 2,000 standard charge points across London.

Vaccine messaging Question No: 2020/4538 Onkar Sahota What campaign and messaging materials around encouraging vaccine uptake has your office produced? Answer for Vaccine messaging The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 141

Vaccine messaging (2) Question No: 2020/4539 Onkar Sahota Are you working with councils to produce messaging materials around encouraging vaccine uptake? Answer for Vaccine messaging (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ICU capacity Question No: 2020/4540 Onkar Sahota In an ICU, the critical care nurse to patient ratio should be 1:1. During the first wave, at its peak, the ratio reached 1:6. The focus and concern should not be about the number of ICU beds available, but instead about the number of trained critical care staff to care for those in ICU. Are you concerned about the pressures on London’s nurses and other NHS staff? Answer for ICU capacity The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Health Equity Group Question No: 2020/4541 Onkar Sahota Can you provide an update on the work of the London Health Equity Group? Answer for London Health Equity Group The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Health Equity Group Question No: 2020/4542 Onkar Sahota Why will the meeting papers for the London Health Equity Group not be made public? Answer for London Health Equity Group

Page 142

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

60+ Oyster Card – Removal of travel ban during morning peak Question No: 2020/4544 Navin Shah Thank you for your response to my question about, in my view, the discriminatory ban on use of 60+ Freedom Pass during morning peak hours. After months of this imposition by DfT there is no sign of the removal of this restriction. What steps are you taking to demand that the Government removes this condition forthwith? If the ban is not lifted when you are negotiating the next TfL funding can you give me assurance that you would lobby the DfT to lift this condition? Answer for 60+ Oyster Card – Removal of travel ban during morning peak The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LLDC – Park Venues Question No: 2020/4545 Navin Shah Whilst I appreciate that many of the venues are currently closed, can you please indicate what recovery plans you have for gradual opening of the venues and particularly their use by local communities and stakeholders like schools? Answer for LLDC – Park Venues The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LLDC – ‘Towers of Privilege’ Question No: 2020/4546 Navin Shah In August 2017 referring to the future of the LLDC I asked you if you were sympathetic to the view that the LLDC’s planning powers could be handed back ahead of the planned period of 2030 to the boroughs to complement and further progress the great social and economic convergence agenda? I note that no progress has been made on this. Now I notice that the relevant East London borough leaders have called for return of powers from

Page 143

the Olympic Legacy corporation which I support. Is it not the time that this happens without any further delay? Answer for LLDC – ‘Towers of Privilege’ The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LLDC – Construction Question No: 2020/4547 Navin Shah I appreciate that construction works continue around and on the Park. However, can you confirm the state of current delay in completion targets due to the pandemic and any cost implications arising from that? Answer for LLDC – Construction The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

NHS Staff – Carparking Charges Question No: 2020/4548 Navin Shah Do you support proposals for 200 per cent hike in hospital parking fees recently reported in the Mail on Sunday? It is not clear when the plan will be implemented but is there any way NHS staff in London can be protected from the hike? Answer for NHS Staff – Carparking Charges The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Uptake of Covid-19 Vaccines in London Question No: 2020/4549 Navin Shah The recent poll from the London Assembly Health Committee indicates worrying stats in that a quarter of Londoners (“15% very unlikely”, “10% fairly unlikely”) to take the vaccines with “17% don’t knows”. The concerns are further compounded by additional polls highlighting the reluctance of people from BAME communities to get the jab (“23% very

Page 144

unlikely” and “14% fairly unlikely”). What London wide strategies are planned to encourage much greater take up and extensive and effective distribution of vaccines? Answer for Uptake of Covid-19 Vaccines in London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

‘Save Christmas’ – Plight of Restaurants & Hospitality Sector Question No: 2020/4550 Navin Shah The Tier two announcement allowing restaurants and some pubs to remain open has seen a distinct increase in bookings and been welcome by the hospitality sector. However, the sector is still facing a tough time beyond festive period. What do you expect Government to do the help the sector on its knees and how can you do to revive the hospitality sector in London? ‘Save Christmas’ – Plight of Restaurants & Hospitality Sector The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The decision by the government to rapidly put London into tier three from 16 December was incredibly disappointing for London businesses who have suffered so much already this year. We now urgently need more government support for the hardest hit sectors of our economy, including hospitality, culture and leisure. For any businesses affected by the further restrictions put in place during the festive period. I have called for a compensation scheme which covers lost income, based on last year’s returns. The Government must also cover the full cost of Statutory Sick Pay for workers who have to self-isolate. I continue to lobby for extension of the business rates holiday and a reversal on the decision to end VAT- free shopping. I’m determined to do all I can to support London’s hospitality sector and continue to provide grants and support directly to businesses. I also am urgently pressing forward with key London stakeholders on a meaningful and achievable roadmap for the safe reopening London’s economy, with recommended actions for Government, boroughs, City Hall and other partners.

Slump of Tourism in London Question No: 2020/4551 Navin Shah It is suggested that UK could lose £60 million a day through a slump in tourism. London’s Tourism industry accounts for one in seven jobs in the capital. This, in the short and long

Page 145

term also means a deep decline in the viability of various sectors including retail, leisure, creative, culture and hotels etc. Experts within the tourism industry agree that the tourism sector needs much greater and specific support from Government. How far has the Government recognised this and do you think there is adequate support available from Government for a sustained recovery? Answer for Slump of Tourism in London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

City Hall – Anti-Racist Organisation Question No: 2020/4552 Navin Shah In your initiative you refer to actions and targets by gender and ethnicity. What will be the process for monitoring outcomes and review if needed? Answer for City Hall – Anti-Racist Organisation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Low Traffic Neighbourhoods Question No: 2020/4553 Navin Shah Are LTN schemes blunt tools, failing to achieve the desired benefits of the Streetspace programme to promote healthy streets? In some case they are having negative impact. So, don’t you think the current implementation procedures need replacing by more effective and collaborative work between TfL, Department of Transport and Councils ensuring that due consultations and equality impact assessments are undertaken before implementation and there are clear strategies to monitor the outcomes and reviews? Answer for Low Traffic Neighbourhoods The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 146

Rising unemployment (3) Question No: 2020/4554 Leonie Cooper It is clear that some sectors, especially retail, hospitality, aviation, culture and creative, are being hit harder by rising unemployment than others. Can you give a breakdown of levels of unemployment in these sectors, using the most up to date figures available? Answer for Rising unemployment (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Mass deportation flights Question No: 2020/4555 Florence Eshalomi MP The Home Office has used specially chartered flights to deport rejected refugees and migrants en masse for 12 years now. A constituent of mine wants Government to end this method of deportation for foreign-born offenders who came to the UK as children. Do you share her concerns that mass deportation flights are a violation of basic human rights? Mass deportation flights The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Government should support people to access their rights instead of expediting deportations. The Government’s discriminatory hostile environment policies are affecting children and young people, alongside their parents and grandparents. I published research in January, which estimated that there are 133,000 undocumented children and young people in London who risk deportation once they turn 18. Some were born here; others have been here since childhood. They are British in all but paperwork, but the UK’s citizenship fees have become among the highest in the world under this Government. I’m dedicated to supporting young Londoners to access their citizenship and settlement rights and I’ve contributed funding to the Justice Together Initiative to make immigration advice more accessible across London. I’ll keep calling on the Government to reduce citizenship and immigration fees, as well as reinstating legal aid for children, which is vital for ensuring that children and young people are protected from this injustice.

E-scooters Question No: 2020/4556 Florence Eshalomi MP Can you reassure my constituents that the increased use of e-scooters will enable pedestrians to use pavements safely? We must ensure greener forms of transport are safe

Page 147

for all concerned via additional regulation and by ensuring there is not a law enforcement deficit. E-scooters The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Private use of e-scooters on any public highway remains illegal, and the Metropolitan Police Service is undertaking enforcement activity to deal with illegal use of e-scooters, including enforcing against activities such as riding e-scooters on pavements. On 17 November 2020, Transport for London (TfL) and London Councils launched the procurement process to select up to three operators for a multi-borough London rental e- scooter trial. The trial is scheduled to commence in spring 2021, with safety as the main focus. Riding on pavements or footways will remain illegal throughout the trial, and boroughs will be specifying where e-scooters can and cannot be ridden or parked, supported by geofencing technology. Prospective operators bidding for the trial will be assessed on their ability to meet strict safety requirements and high operating standards. This will include plans for providing the appropriate technology and comprehensive training to users on how to ride e-scooters safely and considerately, including absolute clarity on the prohibition of riding e-scooters on footways.

TfL Toilet Charges Question No: 2020/4557 Joanne McCartney Further to my MQ 2019/0405 and subsequent meeting with TfL officers what progress has been made in ensuring all TfL toilets are free to use? I note that during the pandemic those TfL toilets that still required a charge were to be made free, if possible, to reduce the need for cash handling. Have charges now been scrapped at all TfL facilities and will these changes be made permanent? Answer for TfL Toilet Charges The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Money laundering Question No: 2020/4558 Murad Qureshi How is the Met working with HMRC and other financial authorities to tackle money laundering?

Page 148

Answer for Money laundering The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (1) Question No: 2020/4559 Andrew Boff Will the entire £4 billion affordable housing funding for 2021-26 be used to fund the 35,000 homes as set out in MD2707? If not, how much of the fund will be used? Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The settlement for £4bn for the AHP 2021-26 programme will be used in full to support 35,000 affordable homes.

Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (2) Question No: 2020/4560 Andrew Boff How much of the £4 billion affordable housing funding for 2021-26 will not be used to fund the 35,000 homes set out in MD2707? What alternative projects will this money be spent on, and how many homes will this deliver? Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The settlement for £4bn for the AHP 2021-26 programme will be used in full to support 35,000 affordable homes.

Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (3) Question No: 2020/4561 Andrew Boff Will any of the £4 billion allocated for the 2021-26 programme be used to deliver the 116,000 homes within the 2016-23 programme? Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 149

The funding settlement for the current AHP 2016-23 programme (£4.82bn) is separate to the funding settlement of £4bn for the AHP 2021-26 programme, which will be used in full to support 35,000 affordable homes.

Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (4) Question No: 2020/4562 Andrew Boff How many homes in the 2021-26 programme do you expect to be family sized with three bedrooms or more? How many will be one-bedroom and how many will be two-bedroom? Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have not set targets to fund homes of different sizes in the new Affordable Homes Programme because my new London Plan asks boroughs, for the first time, to set out size and mix requirements for new social housing in their local policies based on evidence of local need. Instead of setting a top-down London-wide target, this approach provides boroughs with the flexibility to set size and mix policies which are right for their area. The move away from fixed tariff rates to negotiated grant rates in the new AHP gives partners the opportunity to bring forward schemes with more larger family-sized homes and request grant levels required to make those schemes viable.

Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (5) Question No: 2020/4563 Andrew Boff Will you please provide a breakdown of how many homes will be started and completed from the 2021-26 programme each year? Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The AHP 2021-26 programme funding guide was launched in November 2020 and allocations from the bidding round are expected to be announced in June 2021. Following that I will be in a position to determine the annual profile of homes from 2021 to 2026.

Page 150

Renaming the CW3 Cycleway Question No: 2020/4564 Andrew Boff The route of the CW3 cycleway goes past the proposed new Chinese Embassy. Will you consider celebrating the freedom of speech for which this city is famous by renaming it the “Joshua Wong cycleway”? Answer for Renaming the CW3 Cycleway The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

BCU Sex Work Advisory role Review Question No: 2020/4565 Andrew Boff What reviews are there into the BCU Sex Work Advisory role? Answer for BCU Sex Work Advisory role Review The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

BCU Sex Work Advisors Training Question No: 2020/4566 Andrew Boff What training do BCU Sex Work Advisors receive? Answer for BCU Sex Work Advisors Training The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

National Ugly Mugs Funding Question No: 2020/4567 Andrew Boff What GLA Group funding has been provided to the National Ugly Mugs scheme in the past 2 years? Answer for National Ugly Mugs Funding The Mayor

Page 151

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Bus Driver Diversity & Inclusion Training Question No: 2020/4568 Andrew Boff Further to your answer to my question 2020/0714, how many of London’s 25,000 bus drivers have received Diversity & Inclusion training and when do you expect all drivers to have completed this training? Bus Driver Diversity & Inclusion Training The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 All London bus drivers receive Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) training, designed by Transport for London (TfL), as part of their initial training. The subject has also been addressed within annual Certificate of Professional Competence training like “All Aboard” and “Hello London”. TfL recognises, however, that some drivers may have completed D&I-specific training some time ago, and that new training will ensure all drivers and support staff receive the latest best practice, knowledge, skills and behaviours. TfL’s overall training programme was paused twice during lockdown to protect staff and bring in coronavirus-safe methods. The current programme envisages a bespoke D&I course being developed for and attended by all fleet drivers by the end of 2023.

Acoustic Vehicle Alert System Question No: 2020/4569 Andrew Boff Further to your answer to my question 2020/0714, please can you give an update on TfL’s Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System on buses and give details of the consultation process? Acoustic Vehicle Alert System The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 There are currently more than 200 buses in the fleet with the new Acoustic Vehicle Alerting Systems (AVAS) and this total will grow by a further 176 vehicles into the first half of 2021. Prior to its development, six national accessibility groups based in London, were invited to workshops to give their views and feedback. The current signature sound is the result of that process. In response to a direct request from these accessibility groups, Transport for London (TfL) has licensed the bus AVAS sound for use on buses outside of London and is encouraging its

Page 152

uptake by transport authorities and bus operators elsewhere in the UK. This would promote a single bus signature sound for the UK. Several transport authorities and bus operators in the West Midlands and Scotland have licenced or are in the process of licencing the sound on more than 75 buses so far. TfL is also seeking to further enhance the effectiveness of AVAS’s safety benefits by optimising the volume level of this signature sound in response to background noise. In February 2021, TfL will conduct more engagement with Londoners including accessibility groups through an online survey. Optimising AVAS is a further example of how TfL is endeavouring to exceed the international regulatory minimum requirements for AVAS.

Failure to provide turn up and go services Question No: 2020/4570 Andrew Boff Further to your answer to my question 2020/0714, how many complaints have you had about TfL failing to provide turn up and go services? Answer for Failure to provide turn up and go services The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Taipei - Sister City Question No: 2020/4571 Andrew Boff Will you invite Taipei to be a sister city with London? Answer for Taipei - Sister City The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Recovery Board Question No: 2020/4572 Andrew Boff Will you include a representative of organisations for the disabled on the London Recovery Board? Answer for London Recovery Board The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 153

Officers are drafting a response

Highways Consultations Question No: 2020/4573 Andrew Boff How will Londoners with disabilities be consulted when you modify highways? Answer for Highways Consultations The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London City Airport Question No: 2020/4574 Andrew Boff Will you resist the proposed increase in flghts from London City Airport? London City Airport The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I note that, on 4 December, London City Airport published its final Master Plan, a non- statutory statement of its future plans. I raised a number of significant concerns in response to its consultation on its draft Master Plan last year (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/mayoral- letter-london-city-masterplan-consultation-accessible.pdf). On the key question of increased flights – particularly at times of day currently witnessing few if any flights – the final Master Plan does not represent a fundamental change of position from the draft, albeit the likely timescales have inevitably been pushed back as a result of the collapse in aviation demand this year. Should London City Airport come forward with a planning application for development in the future – and one that is referable to me – I will scrutinise the proposals, giving very careful consideration to their environmental impacts.

Air Monitoring - Silvertown Tunnel Question No: 2020/4575 Andrew Boff What air quality monitoring will take place at schools around the approaches to the Silvertown Tunnel? Answer for Air Monitoring - Silvertown Tunnel The Mayor

Page 154

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Construction Question No: 2020/4576 Andrew Boff How many working days were lost after the Mayor’s decision to stop work on housebuilding sites in 2020 due to coronavirus? Construction The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The GLA does not hold data on working days on housebuilding sites. The decision to pause work on such sites was taken by our partners in response to emerging Public Health England guidance and my encouragement for work to be deferred where it was not safety critical. This action was critical in keeping workers safe and containing the spread of the virus in the city. The impact of coronavirus on the productivity of construction sites continues - as Public Health England guidelines required reduced or staggered on-site presence of workers - and I will continue to work with the industry to support construction and housing delivery without undermining public health objectives.

Housing completions (1) Question No: 2020/4577 Andrew Boff Of the GLA-funded affordable homes started since 2017/18, how many have been completed to date? Please provide a breakdown by borough and number of bedrooms. Answer for Housing completions (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Housing completions (2) Question No: 2020/4578 Andrew Boff Further to your response to question 2020/2442, could you please provide a borough breakdown for the number of GLA-funded affordable homes started in 2016/17 which have now been completed?

Page 155

Answer for Housing completions (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Permitted development rights Question No: 2020/4579 Andrew Boff What work have you done with local authorities regarding the conversion of commercial space under permitted development rights? Permitted development rights The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I continue to work with all of London’s local planning authorities to monitor conversions of commercial space to residential use under permitted development rights through the London Development Database. I supported the CAZ boroughs by publishing strategic evidence to inform the introduction of Article 4 Directions to remove office to residential permitted development rights. This helped to safeguard central London’s nationally significant office locations. In my London Plan I also encourage boroughs to introduce Article 4 Directions to safeguard strategic office capacity beyond central London and industrial and logistics capacity across the capital where appropriate. I have highlighted concerns about the implications of the Government’s proposals on PDR and continue to make the case that permitted development rights should be devolved to London government. This would ensure that appropriate flexibility can be provided – but in ways that deliver Good Growth for the capital and ensure higher quality development.

Live-work units Question No: 2020/4580 Andrew Boff Can you confirm how many live-work units have been provided as part of your affordable housing programme? Live-work units The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The GLA Open Project system used to project manage schemes approved in the Affordable Housing 2016-21 programme does not hold information to explicitly identify these types of units. Funding approvals for all projects are made on the merit of the general affordable

Page 156

housing criteria set out in the AH 16-21 and Addendum funding guides available on the GLA website.

Planning ‘call-in’ powers Question No: 2020/4581 Andrew Boff Can you please confirm whether you intend to publish guidelines on which types of development you will ‘call-in’, and if so when this will be published? Answer for Planning ‘call-in’ powers The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Housing investment Question No: 2020/4582 Andrew Boff What efforts have you made to use City Hall as a platform to attract institutional investors, pension and other investment funds to finance homes for long term, secure rent, and what has been the outcome of these efforts? Housing investment The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Please see Mayor’s Question 2020/3545for information on how the Mayor has used City Hall as a platform to attract institutional investors, pension and other investment funds to finance homes for long term, secure rent; and the outcome of these efforts to date.

Workforce homes Question No: 2020/4583 Andrew Boff What incentives have you explored for businesses to provide investment in new homes which could benefit their workforce? Workforce homes The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Through my Affordable Homes Programme 2016-2023, I have delivered a record number of affordable homes, and my London Plan (Intend to Publish version) policies will help ensure

Page 157

that public sector land makes a greater contribution to delivering affordable homes in future. Given the urgent need for affordable housing and the importance of retaining key public sector workers, I have worked closely with major public sector employers and landowners. With NHS trusts and other partners, I established the London Estates Board so that surplus land can be identified, and proper investment secured to deliver the affordable homes key workers need. My London Housing Strategy also makes clear my support for genuinely affordable homes for key workers on land owned by Government department and agencies.

Land banking Question No: 2020/4584 Andrew Boff What discussions have you had with central government regarding devolving “use it or lose it” powers to prevent land banking? Land banking The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I am committed to supporting the pace of housing delivery in London and have supported the Government to develop effective measures to get homes built faster through, for example, my response to Sir Oliver Letwin’s Independent Review of Housing Build Out Rates. The review found that affordable housing can play an important role in de-risking development and unlocking faster build out, and I have called on the Government to recognise and meet the scale of funding needed to support this. The Covid-19 Housing Delivery Taskforce, convened by my Deputy Mayor for Housing and Residential Development to plot a route to recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, sets out recommendations for the GLA to work with the Government to support a range of measures that will unlock more land for housing and support development. These recommendations include reform of the CPO process, and the introduction of a new Compulsory Selling Order power for councils. I have also adopted a threshold approach to viability which provides a Fast Track Route for developers who meet the affordable housing threshold, including an incentive to develop before the two-year review mechanism is triggered.

Lettings agency Question No: 2020/4585 Andrew Boff Do you have any plans to set up a not-for-profit lettings agency for good landlords? If so, when will this be established?

Page 158

Lettings agency The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I do not have plans to set up a not-for-profit lettings agency. When I took office, I was determined to tackle the egregious fees letting agents were charging tenants across London. Thanks to lobbying by me and other voices in the sector, and despite opposition from some Members of the London Assembly, these fees were banned in 2018. In the intervening years, many councils in the capital have moved away from the social lettings agency model as it is increasingly difficult to establish viable schemes in London, where the market for landlords’ business is enormously competitive. There are better ways that I can support renters, including my Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker and new Property License Checker, my new private rented sector enforcement qualification for councils, the illegal eviction prevention training I have arranged for Met police officers, and lobbying for changes to security of tenure and welfare. I continue to support organisations running social lettings agencies.

Housing associations Question No: 2020/4586 Andrew Boff What work have you done with housing associations to keep their rents down for existing tenants? Housing associations The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Housing associations are required to comply with the Rent Standard set and implemented by the Regulator of Social Housing. I have consistently rejected the Government’s dodgy definition of “Affordable Rent” at 80% of market rents. I am committed to increasing the supply of genuinely affordable homes for low-cost rent and I continue to impress upon the Government London’s acute need for new social rented homes. I am pleased that they were persuaded that over half of the homes funded through the 2021-26 Affordable Homes Programme I recently announced will be social rented homes.

Downsizing Question No: 2020/4587 Andrew Boff What policies do you plan to introduce to help older Londoners downsize into smaller homes? Downsizing The Mayor

Page 159

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I already run two successful schemes specifically aimed at enabling social housing tenants to downsize, Housing Moves for those who want to move within London and Seaside and Country Homes for older tenants who want to move to a rural or coastal area. By delivering homes for older people, my Care and Support Specialised Housing programme also provides opportunities for older Londoners wishing to downsize. These complement the work local authorities and housing associations to support opportunities for those on Housing Needs Registers or their own tenants to transfer to smaller homes. My Intend to Publish London Plan makes clear that boroughs should ensure a range of new homes are provided that meet the needs of those who wish to downsize. These may well include specialist housing for older people (for which the Plan outlines annual benchmarks at borough-level).

Small workspaces Question No: 2020/4588 Andrew Boff What planning protections do you intend to introduce for small industrial and creative workspaces? Small workspaces The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My new London Plan supports the provision, and where appropriate, protection of a range of business space through borough Local Plans, to meet the needs of SMEs including industrial and creative workspace. Furthermore, the Plan contains policy which supports the provision of affordable workspace through local development plans and through development proposals where appropriate, for sectors that have cultural value including creative workspace and makerspace. My Plan also encourages boroughs to work with us and relevant stakeholders to identify Creative Enterprise Zones in Local Plans which support the development, enhancement and protection of new and existing creative workspace.

Existing planning protections for such types of workspace have been undermined by the government’s new Use Class E which means that any creative or light industrial workspace can change to any of the other uses in Class E without the need for planning permission. This will be further exacerbated by the government’s latest proposals for permitted development rights to allow commercial uses within Class E to change to housing. I will be writing to government on this matter in due course.

Page 160

Sony TfL advertising campaign Question No: 2020/4589 Gareth Bacon MP How much did TfL raise in revenue as a result of the Sony Playstation 5 advertising campaign at Oxford Circus? Sony TfL advertising campaign The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Article 7 of the Town and Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 makes provision for me to give the local planning authority a direction that I will be the local planning authority if I consider: • the development or any of the issues raised by the development to which the PSI application relates is of such a nature or scale that it would have a significant impact on the implementation of the spatial development strategy; • the development or any of the issues raised by the development to which the application relates has significant effects that are likely to affect more than one London Borough; and • there are sound planning reasons for issuing a direction. Further in deciding whether to give a direction I must take account – (a) where the application relates to development which comprises or includes the provision of more than 150 houses, flats, or houses and flats of the extent to which the council of the London Borough in which the development is or is to be situated is achieving, and has achieved the applicable development plan targets for new housing, including affordable housing; (b) in relation to all applications, of the extent to which the council of the London Borough is achieving, and has achieved any other targets set out in the development plan which are relevant to the subject matter of the application. Answer for Sony TfL advertising campaign The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (1) Question No: 2020/4590 Gareth Bacon MP Further to MD2689, what is the anticipated expenditure for the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm for 2021/22?

Page 161

Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London is one of the most diverse cities in the world, but many Londoners do not see themselves or their histories reflected in our public realm. The range of people immortalised in our statues, memorials and buildings do not capture who we are and what we represent. The Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm, working with London boroughs and partners across the city, will take forward a programme of work to address this. Recruitment for Commission members is currently underway. The GLA has not yet agreed and completed its budget setting process for 2021-22 and beyond. Any budget covering the Commission’s work in future years will be set as part of this process, and published to the London Assembly in early 2021.

Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (2) Question No: 2020/4591 Gareth Bacon MP MD2689 states that ‘delegated authority to the Executive Director, Communities and Skills to approve detailed proposals for £110,000 towards a community fund which will be co- designed with the Commission.’ What is this community fund and what will be its purpose? Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London is one of the most diverse cities in the world and our public realm should reflect the true diversity and make-up of our city. The Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm will engage Londoners to further the discussion into inclusion and representation in the public realm. The Commission will in work in partnership with boroughs and communities to ensure our street names, squares and statues properly reflect our city’s achievements. The purpose of the community fund is to support local people to begin to make a change to their public realm. This could be by supporting new representations in our streets and space, through artworks, murals, plaques or other methods. The programme will be designed by the Commission when it begins to meet.

Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (3) Question No: 2020/4592 Gareth Bacon MP When will the members of the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm be announced? Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 162

Applications for the Commission for Diversity in Public Realm closed on 4 October 2020. Almost 300 applications were received from a diverse and highly skilled range of people from across London and from a wide range of backgrounds, indicating the passion, knowledge and desire for action in this area. Of the applicants, 61 per cent were female, 69 per cent were from Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic backgrounds, 9 per cent have a disability and 18 per cent were LGBTQ+. 34 candidates were interviewed by a panel which included an independent external panel member to ensure a fair process. Final recommendations from the interview panel are expected later this month. The names of the Members will be announced as soon as possible, once they have been formally appointed and references have been checked.

Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (4) Question No: 2020/4593 Gareth Bacon MP How many meetings has the Mayor personally had with the co-Chairs of the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm to discuss the project specifically? Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London is one of the most diverse cities in the world, but many Londoners do not see themselves or their histories represented in our public realm. That is why, in June, I asked my Deputy Mayors Justine Simons OBE, Deputy Mayor for Culture and Creative Industries and Dr Debbie Weekes-Bernard, Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility and Community Engagement, to co-chair the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm. I have met with them separately on numerous occasions, as outlined in MQ4752 and MQ4727. They have made significant progress in the recruitment of Commission members, and have formed a Partners Board including Historic England, English Heritage, Arts Council England, Black Cultural Archives, Shape Arts and others. They have met with 11 Borough leaders and have delivered a series of public engagement events. My Deputy Mayors provide me with regular updates on all their work on the Commission.

Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (5) Question No: 2020/4594 Gareth Bacon MP Please list all the statues, monuments and plaques on land owned by the Greater London Authority. Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm (5)

Page 163

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Please find the lists below. Parliament Square Gardens Sir Robert Peel Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield Edward Stanley, Earl of Derby Viscount Palmerston Field Marshall Jan Christian Smuts Sir Winston Churchill Nelson Mandela David Lloyd George Mahatma Gandhi Dame Millicent Fawcett [plinth includes images of 50 other suffragists] Trafalgar Square Nelson’s Column, topped with statue of Admiral Horatio Lord Nelson Bronze bas-reliefs x4, base of column Bronze lion sculptures x4, base of column Major-General Sir Henry Havelock General Sir Charles Napier King George IV Admiral Cunningham Admiral Beatty Admiral Jellicoe Fountains x2 with sculptures of Dolphins & Tritons Imperial Standards of Lengths, historic bronze inlay 4th plinth sculpture, with temporary art installations Stone drinking fountains x2, engraved text ‘GIVEN BY THE METROPOLITAIN DRINKING FOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION 1960’ Stone inscription, paving centre of Square ‘THESE FOUNTAINS AND THE BUSTS AGAINST THE NORTH WALL OF THE SQUARE WERE ERECTED BY PARLIAMENT TO THE MEMORY OF ADMIRALS OF THE FLEET EARL JELLICOE AND EARL BEATTY TO THE END THAT THEIR ILLUSTRIOUS SERVICES TO THE STATE MIGHT NEVER BE FORGOTTEN’ Information panel, etched metal, located on NE balcony Information panel, metal relief, south of Nelson’s Column

Page 164

Crossrail (1) Question No: 2020/4595 Gareth Bacon MP Question 2020/2671 states, ‘Following the start of Trial Running, it will then take a period of time to fully test the Elizabeth line before it can open for passenger service.’ How long is this testing expected to last? Answer for Crossrail (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail (2) Question No: 2020/4596 Gareth Bacon MP Given the latest funding package agreed for the completion of Crossrail, can you confirm the proposed opening date of the full line? Answer for Crossrail (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail (3) Question No: 2020/4597 Gareth Bacon MP How many drivers are currently trained to drive trains on the Crossrail line? Is this number enough to provide a full service when the line opens in its entirety? Answer for Crossrail (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail (4) Question No: 2020/4598 Gareth Bacon MP Please detail the full final fare structure for the whole Crossrail line. Answer for Crossrail (4)

Page 165

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Car accidents (1) Question No: 2020/4599 Gareth Bacon MP Presenting the data by year since 2015/16, how many car accidents which caused death have involved a person over-70 in London? Answer for Car accidents (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Car accidents (2) Question No: 2020/4600 Gareth Bacon MP Please break down the number of car accidents by age group (17 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, 80 and over) in the year up to November 2020? Answer for Car accidents (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Car accidents (3) Question No: 2020/4601 Gareth Bacon MP Presenting the data by year since 2015/16, what proportion of car accidents have involved a person over-70 in London? Answer for Car accidents (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 166

Car accidents (4) Question No: 2020/4602 Gareth Bacon MP Please break down the number of car accidents which caused death by age group (17 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, 80 and over) in the year up to November 2020? Answer for Car accidents (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail 2 Question No: 2020/4603 Gareth Bacon MP What are your projected timelines for Crossrail 2? Answer for Crossrail 2 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Scrapping Taxis without TfL Consultation Question No: 2020/4604 Keith Prince Broken down for each of the last 6 years, how many London Taxi drivers have been forced to scrap their vehicles without any compensation from TFL? Answer for Scrapping Taxis without TfL Consultation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Extension Advertising (1) Question No: 2020/4605 Keith Prince In total and broken down by month, how much has City Hall and Transport for London spent advertising the extension of the Ultra-Low Emission Zone in October 2021? Answer for ULEZ Extension Advertising (1)

Page 167

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Extension Advertising (2) Question No: 2020/4606 Keith Prince How much does City Hall and TfL plan to spend for each subsequent months to inform Londoners about the change? Answer for ULEZ Extension Advertising (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Expansion Awareness (1) Question No: 2020/4607 Keith Prince Broken down by borough and for the whole of London, what percentage of Londoners are aware of the upcoming extension of the ULEZ? Answer for ULEZ Expansion Awareness (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Expansion Awareness (2) Question No: 2020/4608 Keith Prince If the expansion of the ULEZ were to go ahead in October 2021, what percentage of Londoners do you believe ought to have been made aware of the expansion ahead of it happening? Answer for ULEZ Expansion Awareness (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 168

TfL Buses Service Volume (1) Question No: 2020/4609 Keith Prince What was the service volume for TfL buses (million km operated) for 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, and 2020/21? Answer for TfL Buses Service Volume (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Buses Service Volume (2) Question No: 2020/4610 Keith Prince What was the service volume for TfL buses (million km operated) broken down into outer and inner London for 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, and 2020/21? Answer for TfL Buses Service Volume (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Buses Service Volume (3) Question No: 2020/4611 Keith Prince What was the service volume for TfL buses (million km operated) broken down by borough for 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, and 2020/21? Answer for TfL Buses Service Volume (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Assaults on London Bus Drivers Question No: 2020/4612 Keith Prince Broken down by month up to November 2020 for the past three years, how many London bus drivers have been assaulted? Answer for Assaults on London Bus Drivers

Page 169

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Complaints Question No: 2020/4613 Keith Prince Please provide a monthly breakdown over the last 5 years up to November 2020 for complaints TfL has received in every category? Answer for TfL Complaints The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail Lost Working Days Question No: 2020/4614 Keith Prince How many working days were lost after the Mayor’s decision to stop work on Crossrail in 2020 due to coronavirus? Answer for Crossrail Lost Working Days The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Sick Leave Question No: 2020/4615 Keith Prince Giving a yearly breakdown for 2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21 to date, please outline how many days of sick leave TfL staff have taken? Please also provide a breakdown of the reasons given for sick leave being taken. Answer for TfL Sick Leave The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 170

Assaults Against TfL Staff Question No: 2020/4616 Keith Prince Presenting the data monthly for Nov 19 to Oct 20 please can you provide the number of times TFL staff were: • Attacked? • Threatened with a knife/bladed article? • Injured by a knife/bladed article? Answer for Assaults Against TfL Staff The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

LTN Car Accidents Question No: 2020/4617 Keith Prince How many car accidents have been reported within Low Traffic Neighbourhoods broken down by scheme? Answer for LTN Car Accidents The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Euston Road Eastbound Traffic Speed (1) Question No: 2020/4620 Keith Prince What was the average speed of traffic eastbound on Euston Road over the first week of December 2020? Answer for Euston Road Eastbound Traffic Speed (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 171

Euston Road Westbound Traffic Speed (2) Question No: 2020/4621 Keith Prince What was the average speed of traffic westbound on Euston Road over the first week of December 2020? Answer for Euston Road Westbound Traffic Speed (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Effective Use of Manpower Question No: 2020/4622 Keith Prince During the Covid-19 pandemic, when Tube drivers were on sick leave or self-isolating, what consideration was given to using the 140 underused Crossrail drivers to drive Tube trains? Answer for Effective Use of Manpower The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Mayor’s Transport Strategy - Taxis Question No: 2020/4623 Keith Prince Given the dramatic decrease in vehicles, does the Mayor agree that a fully wheelchair accessible, emissions target achieving taxi fleet should be included in his 80% target within his 2018 Transport Strategy? Mayor’s Transport Strategy - Taxis The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The success of London’s future transport system relies on reducing Londoners’ dependency on cars in favour of active, efficient and sustainable modes of travel. This shift will help address many of the health, congestion and environmental challenges we face as a city. Accordingly, Policy 1 of my Transport Strategy sets out my aim for 80 per cent of trips in London to be made on foot, bicycle or public transport by 2041. It would be inappropriate for taxis to be included in this 80 per cent target given they do not contribute to our aims to increase Londoners physical activity and given they do create emissions, including from tyre and brake wear. However, taxis and PHVs will continue to play a role in London’s future transport mix, catering for some of the 20 per cent of trips in

Page 172

2041 that are not expected to be made by foot, cycle or public transport. My Transport Strategy states that taxis are an important mode of transport that provide an accessible, door-to-door service for Londoners and visitors, and that’s why Policy 20 of my Transport Strategy seeks to ensure London has a safe, secure and accessible world-class taxi service.

Taxi Licence Fees Deferral Question No: 2020/4624 Keith Prince Due to severe financial challenges facing taxi drivers and proprietors, will the Mayor consider a deferral scheme of taxi drivers’ vehicle licence fees? Answer for Taxi Licence Fees Deferral The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Internal Audit’s decision to discontinue IA 16767 - Trams Management of Operational Risk Audit Question No: 2020/4625 Keith Prince In your response to Question 2020/4094 you stated “All decisions whether to undertake or to discontinue an audit were taken by Transport for London Internal Audit.” On what date did TfL Internal Audit decide to discontinue IA 16767 and who authorised this decision? Please provide me with copies of all communications (including handwritten notes) associated with TfL Internal Audit’s decision to discontinue IA 16767, including (but not limited to) any exchanges with First Group, TfL’s General Counsel, the Transport Commissioner and Audit and Assurance. Answer for TfL Internal Audit’s decision to discontinue IA 16767 - Trams Management of Operational Risk Audit The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 173

Protocols for Undertaking or Discontinuing Internal Audits Question No: 2020/4626 Keith Prince Following up on Questions 2020/4094, please provide me with a copy of TfL’s formal protocols for undertaking or discontinuing an Internal Audit. Answer for Protocols for Undertaking or Discontinuing Internal Audits The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Discontinued Internal Audits from 1 January 2014 to present Question No: 2020/4627 Keith Prince Please provide me with the reference number and title of all Internal Audits commenced and discontinued from 1 January 2014 to the present and the formal reason why the audit was discontinued. Answer for Discontinued Internal Audits from 1 January 2014 to present The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Mayor not being informed of IA 16767 - Trams Management of Operational Risk Audit Question No: 2020/4628 Keith Prince Further to you response to Question 2020/4096, when you rejected the London Assembly’s request for an Independent Investigation of TfL’s behaviour during the Crash Investigation on 18 July 2018, you state that you were not aware that TfL was conducting a Safety Audit of First Group TOL when Sandilands occurred on 9 November 2016. When did you become aware of the existence of IA 16767? Please provide me with the exact date when you were informed and all communication and documentation associated with this event. Does it concern you that, as TfL Chair, you were seemingly kept in the dark for potentially over 18 months about IA 16767 while you were making public statements assuring the public of TfL’s full cooperation and transparency with all crash investigations? Answer for Mayor not being informed of IA 16767 - Trams Management of Operational Risk Audit

Page 174

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor’s misleading statements to London Assembly on 11 September 2019 Question No: 2020/4629 Keith Prince Further to your response to Question 2020/4097, does it concern you that— seemingly ignorant of IA 16767 existence—your Deputy Mayor testified to the London Assembly on 11 September 2019 “having looked at a lot of the documents myself, as you would expect, speaking to senior members of staff at TfL about exactly what has happened, I am confident that a further independent investigation into this is not required.” 11 September 2019 was almost 3 years after Sandilands, so when was the Deputy Mayor informed about the existence of IA 16767? Please provide me with all communications and documentation associated with this event. Answer for Deputy Mayor’s misleading statements to London Assembly on 11 September 2019 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Discrepancy in Length of Fieldwork for Internal Audits of First Group TOL. Question No: 2020/4630 Keith Prince In your response to Question 2018/1315, IA 13744 (2014) shows the fieldwork was started and completed in 1 day (18 June 2014) and IA 17780 (2017) shows fieldwork was started and completed in 2 days (13 June-15 June 2017), yet your response to Question 2019/17340 shows fieldwork for IA 16767 started 18 October 2016 and wasn’t scheduled for completion until 15 November 2016. How do you explain the huge discrepancy between the fieldwork required for each of these 3 different safety audits especially when IA 16767 was commenced prior to Sandilands and IA 17780—which took place after—only involved 2 days of fieldwork? Can you assure me that the audit information contained in “IA 16 767vd DRAFT Version D” has not been altered ex post facto to show IA 16767’s fieldwork scheduled to be concluded after Sandilands?

Page 175

Answer for Discrepancy in Length of Fieldwork for Internal Audits of First Group TOL. The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

2017 Letters exchanged between First Group Tram Driver, the Mayor and TfL concerning Safety at Croydon Tram Question No: 2020/4631 Keith Prince In documents found in your long-delayed response to Question 2019/17340, a 7 June 2017 12:26 email from Crossrail Head of Audit to a TfL Internal Audit team states: “A letter has been received by the Mayor from a driver at ‘Victoria Derbyshire’. He was disciplined and sacked by First following a recent incident in which the Mayor called for action by First. The letter blamed the Mayor (etc etc), but also management practices at First, including the design of the tram cabs and poor air conditioning. A decision has been made that a letter in response would come from Howard to the driver. WE will get copies of the documents to use as background information for the audit.” Please provide me with (a) copies of the letter to the Mayor from the Croydon Tram Driver and the response to the Driver from TfL General Counsel and (b) all communication (emails, drafts, handwritten notes) associated with these two letters. Answer for 2017 Letters exchanged between First Group Tram Driver, the Mayor and TfL concerning Safety at Croydon Tram The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Communications about First Group ‘resistance’ to IA 17780 sent by Internal Audit to General Counsel, 7 June - 27 July 2017 Question No: 2020/4632 Keith Prince Data released in Question 2019/17340 shows an 7 June 2017 12:26 email sent from Crossrail Head of Audit to the IA 17780 Internal Audit Team which, inter alia, states: "I have just had Howard [Carter, TfL General Counsel] on the phone. He wanted to say: 1. We may meet some resistance to our audit. If we do so, then we have contractual rights which we can enforce. At the first hint of resistance, can you please let me know, so that we can nip it in the bud

Page 176

3. Howard would like to be kept up to date with regard to progress of the audit, i.e. the LoE, when fieldwork commences, finishes, a first draft report and any problems we have along the way. I have agreed to do this.” Meanwhile, a 27 July 2017 08:01 email released in Question 2020/0023 from Crossrail Head of Audit to TfL’s Head of Internal Audit states “the audit [IA 17780[ was marred throughout by a grudging lack of co-operation. Not downright refusal, but an obvious lack of engagement, and sometimes obfuscation” Please provide me with copies of all communications sent from TfL’s Internal Audit Team and Crossrail’s Head of Audit to TfL General Counsel about the “progress of the audit, i.e. the LoE, when fieldwork commences, finishes, a first draft report and any problems we have along the way” sent by TfL’s IA 17780 Internal Audit Team between 7 June and 27 July 2017. Answer for Communications about First Group ‘resistance’ to IA 17780 sent by Internal Audit to General Counsel, 7 June - 27 July 2017 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Internal Communication about decision to modify IA 17780 sent on 27 July 2017 between 0801-0928 Question No: 2020/4633 Keith Prince Copies of emails you provided in Question 2020/0023 show that a decision was communicated by TfL Internal Audit to modify IA 17780 in order to ‘placate First Group’ between 08:01 and 09:28 on 27 July 2017. Please provide me with copies of all communications (including emails, texts and handwritten notes) relating to the decision to modify IA 17780 sent and received by TfL Internal Audit between 08:01 and 09:28 on 27 July 2017. Answer for TfL Internal Communication about decision to modify IA 17780 sent on 27 July 2017 between 0801-0928 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 177

Mayor’s May 2017 Call to First Group CEO about “the video of a Tram Operations Limited (TOL) driver obtained by the Evening Standard” Question No: 2020/4634 Keith Prince Please provide me with all minutes, briefing materials, communications (including emails and handwritten notes), decisions and follow-up actions connected with the discussion the Mayor had with First Group CEO Tim O’Toole about “the video of a Tram Operations Limited (TOL) driver obtained by the Evening Standard” referred to in O’Toole’s letter to the Mayor dated 25 May 2017 (Ref: TOT/SB/Lett. 0027) released in Question 2019/17340. Answer for Mayor’s May 2017 Call to First Group CEO about “the video of a Tram Operations Limited (TOL) driver obtained by the Evening Standard” The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

IA 16767 Terms of Reference Question No: 2020/4635 Keith Prince Further to your response to Question 2020/4098 please provide me with copies of all communication and documentation (including the terms of reference for IA 16767) that TfL sent to RAIB “ 24 November 2016 and again on 1 February 2017”. Answer for IA 16767 Terms of Reference The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

2014 Report from CIRAS about Fatigue from TOL Croydon Tram Drivers Question No: 2020/4636 Keith Prince Your response to Question 2020/4104 — “Transport for London Internal Audit became aware of the AbsTracked audit during the 13 744 audit, not during an investigation. The Audit team were not informed of the Confidential Incident Reporting & Analysis Service (CIRAS) report at any stage of this audit” — does not answer my question.

Page 178

Were any TfL Executives, including (but not limited to) the Transport Commissioner, MD Surface Transport, Director HSE and/or General Counsel aware/in possession of the 4 March 2014 CIRAS Report about Fatigue from TOL Croydon Tram Drivers before or while IA 13744 was conducted? Answer for 2014 Report from CIRAS about Fatigue from TOL Croydon Tram Drivers The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Safety Incident(s) that Prompted TfL Internal Audit to undertake IA 16767 Question No: 2020/4637 Keith Prince Since TfL Internal Audit’s decision to undertake— (a) IA 17780 was prompted by a safety incident involving a Tram Driver filmed behind the controls on 18 May 2017 and (b) IA 13744 was prompted by a Tram Driver reporting fatigue concerns to CIRAS on 4 March 2014 —what safety incident involving First Group TOL’s operation of the Croydon Tram prompted Internal Audit to commence IA 16767 in October 2016? Answer for Safety Incident(s) that Prompted TfL Internal Audit to undertake IA 16767 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Cycling KSIs Question No: 2020/4638 Keith Prince How many cycling KSIs have there been on London’s roads for every month from January 2015 to the present day? Answer for Cycling KSIs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 179

Crossrail 2 Question No: 2020/4639 Keith Prince During your Mayoralty, have you secured Crossrail 2? Answer for Crossrail 2 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Bakerloo Line Extension Question No: 2020/4640 Keith Prince During your Mayoralty, have you secured the Bakerloo Line Extension? Bakerloo Line Extension The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 During my Mayoralty I have continued to support and develop plans for the Bakerloo line extension. During this time, two public consultations have been carried out, in 2017 and 2019, both of which have demonstrated high levels of public support and have allowed Transport for London (TfL) to confirm the details of the scheme. The results from the most recent public consultation and TfL’s response to the issues raised was published on 30 November. Technical feasibility work has been completed that would support the issuing of Statutory Safeguarding Directions. Following close working with the Department for Transport and the Secretary of State for Transport, the Government has now confirmed that we can proceed with Safeguarding for the scheme, which would prevent premature development on sites required to deliver the project. I will continue to work with government and others on options for funding so this vital project can be delivered, and its many benefits realised.

London Overground Question No: 2020/4641 Keith Prince During your Mayoralty, what extensions have you secured to the London Overground? Answer for London Overground The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 180

Crossrail 3 (1) Question No: 2020/4642 Keith Prince What is your proposed route for Crossrail 3? Answer for Crossrail 3 (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail 3 (2) Question No: 2020/4643 Keith Prince Have you had any discussions with the Government on Crossrail 3? Answer for Crossrail 3 (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Making TfL More Efficient and Profitable Question No: 2020/4644 Keith Prince Since May 2016 have all your spending reductions at TfL had the impact of making TfL a more efficient and profitable organisation? Answer for Making TfL More Efficient and Profitable The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Spending Cuts Question No: 2020/4645 Keith Prince Since May 2016 can you honestly claim that you have avoided any cuts to spending on better TfL services and any cuts to spending that would have boosted capacity? Answer for TfL Spending Cuts The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 181

Officers are drafting a response

Rotherhithe Bridge (1) Question No: 2020/4646 Keith Prince Do you regret promising to deliver the Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf pedestrian and cycle bridge in your 2016 manifesto? Answer for Rotherhithe Bridge (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Rotherhithe Bridge (2) Question No: 2020/4647 Keith Prince When you promised to deliver the Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf pedestrian and cycle bridge in your 2016 manifesto, how much did you anticipate that the bridge would cost? Answer for Rotherhithe Bridge (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Car Clubs Question No: 2020/4648 Keith Prince What evidence is there that you have supported car clubs during your Mayoralty? Answer for Car Clubs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Expansion (1) Question No: 2020/4649 Keith Prince Broken down by month, how much money has TfL spent on the expansion of the ULEZ?

Page 182

Answer for ULEZ Expansion (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Expansion (2) Question No: 2020/4650 Keith Prince In total, how much money does TfL expect to spend on the expansion of the ULEZ? Answer for ULEZ Expansion (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Expansion (3) Question No: 2020/4651 Keith Prince How many cameras does TfL estimate the ULEZ would need to be expanded to the North and South Circulars? Answer for ULEZ Expansion (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

ULEZ Expansion (4) Question No: 2020/4652 Keith Prince Please provide a map detailing the positions of all the cameras that TfL plans to introduce in order to ensure the expansion of the ULEZ to the North and South Circulars is effective, including which cameras are already in position and which are yet to be put in place. Answer for ULEZ Expansion (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 183

Road User Charging Question No: 2020/4653 Keith Prince Will you rule out the introduction of road user charging in London so long as you are Mayor? Road User Charging The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Earlier this year the Transport for London (TfL) Board and I commissioned an independent review to examine potential options for long-term financial stability of TfL and firmer foundations into the future. Londoners pay £500m a year in VED, and I have been clear that it is not fair that the government spends this huge sum almost exclusively outside the capital, with TfL left to fund maintenance of major roads in Greater London from its fare-dominated income. The report recommends that further road user charging income could be used alongside other sources to ensure long-term investment in London’s transport. The report refers to different types of schemes that could be considered to help address policy issues and the funding gap. I have asked TfL to undertake a feasibility study of a Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents, including the case for such a scheme and its impacts on traffic, congestion, air quality, inclusion, health and London’s economy. This will establish whether such a scheme would be effective in delivering key existing policy objectives at the same time as providing essential income for London’s transport network. This detailed feasibility study will provide a sound basis for any future proposals, which, if brought forward, would be fully researched, evidence-based and put to public consultation as part of a proper process.

Maximising Revenue from TfL’s Capital Assets Question No: 2020/4654 Keith Prince Do you accept you should seek to maximise revenue from TfL’s capital assets before agreeing to increase the Mayor’s Precept? Answer for Maximising Revenue from TfL’s Capital Assets The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 184

TfL Finances - Mayoral Priorities Question No: 2020/4655 Keith Prince Given the state of TfL’s finances, do you now accept that you should scrap nominee passes and reduce TfL pension contributions to the public sector average in preference to any other TfL savings? Answer for TfL Finances - Mayoral Priorities The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Updated Business Cases for TfL Capital Projects Question No: 2020/4656 Keith Prince Given the inevitable variations in demand for different transport projects in the light of Covid-19 and the changes to people’s working patterns, have you instructed TfL to re- calculate the business cases for all ongoing and potential projects? Answer for Updated Business Cases for TfL Capital Projects The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Victoria Line Noise - Islington (1) Question No: 2020/4657 Shaun Bailey Hundreds of Islington residents have been suffering with horrific tube noise levels since 2017, when flat bottom track was installed on the Victoria line without an essential track fastener such as Delkor. When will the correct material be installed? Answer for Victoria Line Noise - Islington (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 185

Victoria Line Noise - Islington (2) Question No: 2020/4658 Shaun Bailey Islington residents have informed me that TfL has agreed to grinding, which has an effect for less than two months twice a year. This is an insufficient solution only lowering the noise relatively (59 to 47 decibels). How much is being spent on this process? Answer for Victoria Line Noise - Islington (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Victoria Line Noise - Islington (3) Question No: 2020/4659 Shaun Bailey Islington residents need the respite of slower trains during the section of the Victoria line track but have been told it will ‘affect the timetables’. Slowing the trains would not fix it the problem but would provide some respite. Will the Mayor consider this? Answer for Victoria Line Noise - Islington (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail NDAs Question No: 2020/4661 Shaun Bailey How many NDAs have Crossrail employees signed in each year since 2015/16 including the current year? Answer for Crossrail NDAs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Oyster/Contactless Usage Question No: 2020/4662 Shaun Bailey What percentage of commuters use travelcards/oyster cards and bank cards to travel on bus and tube?

Page 186

Answer for Oyster/Contactless Usage The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tube Travel Payment Methods Question No: 2020/4663 Shaun Bailey What statistics do you have for how users pay for their travel on the tube broken down by the different method of payments in % terms? Answer for Tube Travel Payment Methods The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Debt - 2020 Question No: 2020/4664 Shaun Bailey Please provide a month by month breakdown of TfL debt since January 2020 to date? Answer for TfL Debt - 2020 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Design Festival Question No: 2020/4665 Shaun Bailey What is the total amount of money that has been given by the GLA to the London Design Festival since May 2016? Answer for London Design Festival The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 187

London Architecture Festival Question No: 2020/4666 Shaun Bailey What is the total amount of money that has been given by the GLA to the London Architecture Festival since May 2016? Answer for London Architecture Festival The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Games Festival Question No: 2020/4667 Shaun Bailey What is the total amount of money that has been given by the GLA to the London Games Festival since May 2016? London Games Festival The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The London Games Festival is part of my Creative Economy Growth Programme which has been funded by successive Mayors since the year 2000. It creates jobs and growth by delivering new sales, exports and inward investment in the creative industries.

Last year, the GLA’s funding to London Games Festival helped to deliver £11 million in new inward investment for games businesses.

Since May 2016, I have granted £2,192,000 to London Games Festival.

Tenancy Deposits (1) Question No: 2020/4668 Shaun Bailey Can you provide an update on helping private renters by expanding the use of tenancy deposit loans across London? Tenancy Deposits (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 188

Making renting more affordable for Londoners is vital. Through my Good Work Standard, I am encouraging employers to make interest-free tenancy deposit loans available as part of a package of measures to support their employees. In total, over 90 employers have been accredited through my Good Work Standard, covering 210,000 employees. As set out in my response to question 2020/4670, I also supported the launch of London First’s Employer Housing Pledge in 2017, which included tenancy deposit loans. I have successfully lobbied government to ban rip-off letting agent fees and cap tenancy deposits charged by landlords and, in response to COVID-19, I am calling for grants to be provided to help renters impacted by the pandemic and a two-year rent freeze to ease the pressure of unaffordable rents on renters already bearing the brunt of this crisis.

Tenancy Deposits (2) Question No: 2020/4669 Shaun Bailey Which private employers have agreed to offer tenancy deposits? Tenancy Deposits (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Please see my response to question 2020/4670.

Tenancy Deposits (3) Question No: 2020/4670 Shaun Bailey Which and how many private employers have agreed to offer tenancy deposits as part of the GLA’s London First scheme? Tenancy Deposits (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London First’s Employers Pledge on Housing was launched in 2017. Through this pledge, employers signed up to providing housing support to their employees, including by offering tenancy deposit loans. To support this campaign, I wrote to employers encouraging them to sign up to the pledge. London First are no longer running this campaign and as set out in my response to 2020/4668, I continue to support employers to provide tenancy deposit loans through my Good Work Standard. Employers that signed up to the London First pledge – covering 120,000 employees across the capital - are listed below: ARUP Bird College

Page 189

Child Graddon Lewis Deloitte Dolphin Living Essential Living Golin Grant Thornton Greater London Authority Heathrow Airport Hexagon Iceni JLL LB Hackney LB Camden Lichfields London Communications Agency London Fire Brigade London & Partners London First London Legacy Development Corporation Mace Metropolitan Police Morgan Stanley Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation Optimity Pinsent Masons Portman Estate Quintain Shroders

Page 190

Shaftesbury Transport for London Trim Editing Thames Valley Housing UK Power Networks Westfield West London Business ZSAH

TfL Income - Covid-19 Question No: 2020/4671 Shaun Bailey What is your current estimate for how much money Transport for London has lost in fare revenue due to Covid-19? Answer for TfL Income - Covid-19 The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Freeports Question No: 2020/4672 Shaun Bailey What consideration have you given to freeports in London? Freeports The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 No amount of UK ‘freeports’ will be an adequate substitute for the existing benefits of the current customs union and single market obtained through membership of the European Union. Nor will they be an effective mitigation for the impact on businesses from losing this access through a no deal or flimsy deal Brexit. To date neither the GLA or LEAP have been approached by potential bidders requesting endorsement of an application to the Government’s scheme. However, I will continue to work closely with the Port of London Authority, its partners and the wider south-east, to ensure that any future plans align with my vision to deliver good growth for London that is economically and socially inclusive and environmentally sustainable.

Page 191

Any future plans for this and any other freeport would be closely scrutinised to assess any impacts on jobs, business, transport, air quality and the environment in London.

Zero Emission Buses Question No: 2020/4673 Shaun Bailey By which date will all London buses become zero emission? Answer for Zero Emission Buses The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Oyster Cards (1) Question No: 2020/4674 Shaun Bailey How many Oyster cards are in use? Answer for Oyster Cards (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Oyster Cards (2) Question No: 2020/4675 Shaun Bailey How many people used Oyster cards before lockdown in a typical day before Covid? Answer for Oyster Cards (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tube Payments Question No: 2020/4676 Shaun Bailey Please provide a breakdown in terms of the number of people who use the tube each day and what payment method they use?

Page 192

Answer for Tube Payments The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

City Hall Savings Question No: 2020/4677 Shaun Bailey What is the amount of costs/savings from moving City Hall to The Crystal broken down by year? Answer for City Hall Savings The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Streetspace Schemes/Cost Question No: 2020/4678 Shaun Bailey Please list a breakdown of all Streetspace schemes as well as the cost for each one? Answer for Streetspace Schemes/Cost The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Places of Worship (1) Question No: 2020/4679 Shaun Bailey What was the total number of planning permissions submitted in the 2019/20 year for places of worship? Places of Worship (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 We do not currently hold this information in a format that would enable this question to be answered (for example we cannot interrogate the data by use). The determining authority for the vast majority of these applications will be the boroughs.

Page 193

To address the issue of accessible data in relation to enquiries such as this, the Planning London Datahub was launched on the 18th November 2020 which will enable us to access this data more easily in the future

Places of Worship (2) Question No: 2020/4680 Shaun Bailey Has any research been undertaken regarding how far people have to travel to get to their place of worship? Answer for Places of Worship (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Places of Worship (3) Question No: 2020/4681 Shaun Bailey How many planning permissions for places of worship were rejected in the 2019/20 year across London? Places of Worship (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 We do not currently hold this information in a format that would enable this question to be answered (for example we cannot interrogate the data by use). The determining authority for the vast majority of these applications will be the boroughs.

To address the issue of accessible data in relation to enquiries such as this, the Planning London Datahub was launched on the 18th November 2020 which will enable us to access this data more easily in the future.

Places of Worship (4) Question No: 2020/4682 Shaun Bailey Can you please provide a map which provides a breakdown of all places of worship within London? Answer for Places of Worship (4) The Mayor

Page 194

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Pay Question No: 2020/4683 Shaun Bailey How many TFL employees earned over £100,000 per year in the last financial year after overtime and voluntary redundancy payments are included? Answer for TfL Pay The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Funding Review Question No: 2020/4684 Shaun Bailey In July you announced an independent review of TfL’s long-term future funding and financing options. When was this report completed and when do you intend to publish the results? Answer for TfL Funding Review The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Advertising Spend Question No: 2020/4685 Shaun Bailey How much has the GLA and TfL spent on adverts and other sponsored content in newspapers, since the 2015/16 financial year? Please provide a list of the newspapers and the amount provided to each one. Answer for TfL Advertising Spend The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 195

Police Officers (1) Question No: 2020/4686 Shaun Bailey How many police officers has London had for each year over the last 10 years? Answer for Police Officers (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Police Officers (2) Question No: 2020/4687 Shaun Bailey How much does it cost to hire a police officer? Answer for Police Officers (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

COVID-19 Vaccine Question No: 2020/4688 Shaun Bailey Who will be prioritised for a Covid-19 vaccine in London? Please provide a list showing the various categories. Answer for COVID-19 Vaccine The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail (1) Question No: 2020/4689 Shaun Bailey What is your assessment of the amount of lost fares revenue due to the delays in Crossrail? Answer for Crossrail (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 196

Officers are drafting a response

Crossrail (2) Question No: 2020/4690 Shaun Bailey What is your assessment of the total amount of money Crossrail will cost? Answer for Crossrail (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Police Officers (3) Question No: 2020/4691 Shaun Bailey What is the cost of a full-time police officer, and for a police constable? Answer for Police Officers (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

BNOs (1) Question No: 2020/4692 Shaun Bailey What work has the GLA undertaken to ensure the smooth arrival of British Nationals (Overseas) to London? BNOs (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 GLA officials have met with representatives of Hong Kong British Nationals (Overseas), community groups and organisations supporting East and South East Asian Londoners. This is helping assess potential numbers of arrivals to London, their integration needs, and the capacity and needs of specialist organisations who represent and support Hong Kong communities. The GLA has also engaged with the Home Office to shape proposals for an integration approach to ensure alignment with the Mayor’s ‘All of Us’ strategy for social integration. Government funding must be available to support local authorities to meet increases in demand and build capacity of specialist civil society organisations to ensure holistic support is available for arrivals to London.

Page 197

I welcome the Government’s commitment to British National (Overseas) and look forward to working together to ensure arrivals from Hong Kong feel welcome in London, can access their rights and entitlements, and fully participate in in their new communities.

BNOs (2) Question No: 2020/4693 Shaun Bailey What estimates has the GLA made of how many British National (Overseas) will move to London? BNOs (2) The Mayor Last updated: 17 December, 2020 The GLA has met with the Home Office and community organisations representing Hong Kong British Nationals (Overseas), conducted data analysis to understand the Hong Kong diaspora in London, and modelled arrival numbers under the Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa from 31 January 2021. Estimates by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office suggest a range of between 257,000 and 322,000 arrivals to the UK over five years or a plausible, but more unlikely, range of between 900,000 and 1,050,000. These estimates are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to lack of data and reliance on several assumptions. The GLA estimates a third of UK arrivals will choose to come to London based on analysis of the 2011 Census and language and ethnicity data. BNOs (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The GLA has met with the Home Office and community organisations representing Hong Kong British Nationals (Overseas), conducted data analysis to understand the Hong Kong diaspora in London, and modelled arrival numbers under the Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa from 31 January 2021. Estimates by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office suggest a range of between 257,000 and 322,000 arrivals to the UK over five years or a plausible, but more unlikely, range of between 9,000 and 1,050,000. These estimates are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to lack of data and reliance on several assumptions. The GLA estimates that, should new arrivals follow similar patterns of settlement shown by analysis of the 2011 Census and language and ethnicity data, a third may choose to come to London.

Page 198

London’s Economy Question No: 2020/4694 Shaun Bailey Have you undertaken any research to ascertain which sectors are most important to London’s economy? Answer for London’s Economy The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London’s Economy (2) Question No: 2020/4695 Shaun Bailey What are the components of London’s financial services sector and what percentage do they each contribute? Answer for London’s Economy (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL PR (1) Question No: 2020/4696 Shaun Bailey How much money has TfL spent on PR/public affairs companies over the past 5 years, broken down by year? Please also provide details of what this money was used for and which PR/public affairs companies were/are used? Answer for TfL PR (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL PR (2) Question No: 2020/4697 Shaun Bailey How much money has TFL spent on PR/public affairs companies in the 2019/20 year? Please also provide details of what this money was used for and which PR/public affairs companies were used.

Page 199

Answer for TfL PR (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL PR (3) Question No: 2020/4698 Shaun Bailey How many people does TfL employ who work in external communications, marketing, public relations and PR and what was their total salary costs for 2019/20? Answer for TfL PR (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

MOPAC Spending Question No: 2020/4699 Shaun Bailey How many different spending streams does MOPAC have and how much money within each stream is unallocated? Answer for MOPAC Spending The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tube Train CCTV Question No: 2020/4700 Shaun Bailey How many Tube trains are there on each line? How many of these have been fitted with CCTV cameras? Answer for Tube Train CCTV The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 200

Affordable homes promise in Kidbrook Question No: 2020/4701 Susan Hall In relation to your press release dated 23/08/16, entitled “Mayor brings forward first TfL site to deliver homes for Londoners”, can you please confirm that 400 new homes, 50% to be affordable to rent or buy, have since been built in Kidbrooke? Answer for Affordable homes promise in Kidbrook The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Homelessness Funding Question No: 2020/4702 Susan Hall Can you provide a breakdown of the £38 million spent on supporting London’s rough sleepers during Covid, as detailed in the Q2 monitoring report? To include, if possible, a breakdown of funding origins and key lines of expenditure. Answer for Homelessness Funding The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Tech jobs for young Londoners (1) Question No: 2020/4703 Susan Hall Further to your press release dated 01.12.16, entitled “ Mayor unveils £7m fund to help young Londoners access tech jobs”, could you please provide examples of by how much the number of high-quality learning opportunities for young people aged 15-24 years old in London, to study industry-designed courses in technology, digital & digital-creative disciplines has increased? Tech jobs for young Londoners (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Mayor’s Digital Talent Programme aims to increase the quality and volume of industry- led digital training opportunities for young Londoners aged 16-24 years. The programme is also focused on increasing opportunities for young women and BAME groups who are under-represented in the digital and tech sector.

Page 201

The programme has funded twelve projects targeted at specific needs of the learners, and these have been co-developed with industry practitioners to ensure their market relevance. To date, more than 1,154 young Londoners have accessed new, industry approved learning opportunities (comprising digital, employability and entrepreneurial skills). Over 350 young Londoners have gained new skills and work experience through work placements. In addition, 879 school and FE teachers have been upskilled in industry-relevant digital skills learning and qualifications, and this will in turn translate into improved quality of teaching for young people (11 – 24).

Tech jobs for young Londoners (2) Question No: 2020/4704 Susan Hall Since your press release dated 01.12.16, entitled “Mayor unveils £7m fund to help young Londoners access tech jobs”, could you please advise as to whether 1,000 young Londoners have since been able to access new industry approved learning opportunities. Tech jobs for young Londoners (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Mayor’s Digital Talent programme is a multi-stranded programme that aims to increase the quality and volume of industry-led digital training opportunities for young Londoners aged 16-24 years. The programme has a special focus on young women and people from BAME background to increase the representation of these groups in the digital and tech sectors in London. Since its launch in 2017, it has supported more than 1,154 young Londoners to gain new, industry approved learning opportunities throughout the Digital Skills Training and Young Entrepreneurs projects. Digital Skills Training is focused on employability and digital skills, and trains young Londoners, in a range of digital specialisms from front‑end web development, digital marketing, gaming to visual effects. The Young Entrepreneurs projects prepare, coach and support young people in the planning and development of a start-up, through different levels of support, including an intense internship and accelerator programme. These training programmes have been co-developed with industry players, ensuring their relevancy to the job market.

Page 202

Tech jobs for young Londoners (3) Question No: 2020/4705 Susan Hall Further to your press release dated 01.12.16, entitled “Mayor unveils £7m fund to help young Londoners access tech jobs”, could you please advise as to whether 500 university students have gained new skills and work experience through small business placements. Tech jobs for young Londoners (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 To date, the programme has supported over 354 learners to gain new skills and work experience through the Higher Level Digital Skills, Digital Skills Training, Digital Work Placement and Young Entrepreneurs projects. It is expected that the full target of 500 learners supported to gain new skills and work experience through work placements will be achieved within the programme lifetime. In February 2020, the London Economic Action Partnership (LEAP) widened the target to include organisations larger than small business to allow a wider group of young Londoners to benefit from these sector-wide opportunities.

London Fire Brigade Question No: 2020/4706 Susan Hall Could the Mayor confirm whether or not any more Grenfell Inquiry Phase 1 recommendations have been completed by London Fire Brigade since the press release on 28 October 2020? Answer for London Fire Brigade The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Congestion Charge PCNs Question No: 2020/4708 Susan Hall Since May 2019 a number of Penalty Charge Notices were issued by TfL because a problem in the TfL system meant that, although congestion charge payments were confirmed on the TfL system to drivers, they were never actually claimed from their banks by TfL resulting in the unjust issuing of PCNs. I understand that steps have been taken to remedy this, however, can you: - please confirm that in all cases drivers who incur these penalties are now being identified before penalties are issued? If not, why not?

Page 203

- confirm that drivers in these cases have been notified of the above? - confirm that suitable apologies have been made to all concerned? - detail whether enforcement action been taken against any drivers affected by this problem? - confirm whether you personally apologise to all the drivers affected and distressed by this problem? - confirm that the action taken to remedy this problem will prevent this happening in the future? Answer for Congestion Charge PCNs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Culture Spending Question No: 2020/4709 Susan Hall How much money have you spent on culture in each year since May 2016? Culture Spending The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture and creative industries generate £58.4bn each year and provide one in six jobs in the capital. They drive tourism and hospitality and will play a vital economic and social role in accelerating the capital’s recovery from COVID-19.

Expenditure of the Culture and Creative Industries Unit from April 2016 to March 2020 financial years is below, including the GLA’s joint statutory duty to fund the Museum of London with the City of London Corporation.

Culture & Creative Industries Museum of Year Unit London Total £ m £ m £ m 16/17 4.4 8.1 12.5 Expenditure 17/18 5.9 8.0 13.9 Expenditure

Page 204

18/19 8.0 8.6 16.6 Expenditure 19/20 10.7 7.9 18.6 Expenditure

Total 29.0 32.6 61.6

London Borough of Culture Spending Question No: 2020/4710 Susan Hall How much money have you spent on the London borough of culture programme for each year of its operation? London Borough of Culture Spending The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My London Borough of Culture programme will play an important role in London’s economic and social recovery. Working with 13 local authorities, through title awards and Cultural Impact Awards, it is supporting communities, generating creative jobs, transforming young people’s lives and contributing to local regeneration. Waltham Forest’s title year in 2019 saw them attract 500,000 additional visits to culture, reach every school in the borough, and recruit 1,000 volunteers, who went on to provide important community support during the COVID-19 lockdown. £4.1m was spent in the local area by audiences, and over £1.1m external investment was secured by the Council. Brent 2020’s programme pivoted online, with projects developed in response to COVID-19. While the programme changed, Brent delivered on the ambition of its original bid, with the voices of young people and artists at its heart. Over 500,000 people have engaged with the programme online. The total spend in each year of operation is as follows:

2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 (Budget) £21,077 £240,989 £1,454,560 £2,195,852 £1.394m

Deputy Mayor meetings Question No: 2020/4711 Susan Hall For each of your Deputy Mayors, please list the number of individual meetings you have had with each of them since lockdown began in March 2020 and the subject of those meetings.

Page 205

Answer for Deputy Mayor meetings The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Night Czar meetings Question No: 2020/4712 Susan Hall Please list the number of individual meetings (both in-person and virtual) you have had with the Night Czar since lockdown began in March 2020 and the subject of those meetings. Night Czar meetings The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I refer the Assembly Member to my answer from 15 October 2020, MQ2020/3685; https://www.london.gov.uk/questions/2020/3685 2020/3685. In addition, I have been in two further video meetings with the Night Czar. These were a meeting of my Covid Business Forum and a meeting with the Chief Executive of UK Hospitality to discuss the impact of Covid-19 on the sector. In addition, on 3 December, my Night Czar and I accompanied The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall on a visit to Soho. The visit celebrated London’s night time economy and helped Their Royal Highnesses further understand the impact that Covid-19 has had on venues and night workers.

London’s Night Time Commission Question No: 2020/4713 Susan Hall What work has the London’s Night Time Commission produced specifically on the sector’s recovery from the global pandemic? London’s Night Time Commission The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The London Night Time Commission ceased to exist in January 2019 following publication of their final report, ‘Think Night’. Since then, I have continued to deliver on the recommendations of that report. My Night Time Enterprise Zone Pilot Project in Walthamstow was completed earlier this year. I convened the Late Night Transport Working Group and the development of the

Page 206

Night Time Data Observatory is nearing completion. Guidance created to assist boroughs in developing their own night time strategies includes a section on how local authorities can support night time business in recovering from the impact of Covid-19.

Night Time Borough Champions Network Question No: 2020/4714 Susan Hall According to its GLA webpage, the last meeting of the Night Time Borough Champions Network was in April 2020. Why hasn’t the Night Czar held any further meetings of this network in 2020 at such a crucial time in London’s economic recovery from COVID-19? Night Time Borough Champions Network The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Night Time Borough Champions Network usually meets quarterly. So far this year there have been meetings on 18th February, 1st April, 30th April, 21st May, 22nd May and 8th December. These included additional meetings to discuss the impact of Covid-19 and to help develop night time strategy guidance for boroughs.

Night Czar achievements (1) Question No: 2020/4715 Susan Hall Please list the specific achievements of the Night Czar since lockdown began. Night Czar achievements (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I refer the Assembly Member to answer https://www.london.gov.uk/questions/2020/3686 from 15th October. The Night Czar continues support our work on London’s transition and recovery and is working hard to ensure a safe and coordinated reopening of businesses on the high street. She also continues to be in regular contact with those industries bodies that represent night time businesses. This ensures that we have the latest sector specific information about the ongoing impact of the pandemic. This informs our thinking around the support we can offer as well as our asks of Central Government.

Page 207

Night Czar achievements (2) Question No: 2020/4716 Susan Hall What specific actions did you ask the Night Czar to undertake since lockdown began in March 2020 to support the recovery of London’s night-time economy? a) How many actions has she achieved, b) How many actions remain outstanding, and c) What Key Performance Indicators did you ask her to perform against? Night Czar achievements (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I refer the Assembly Member to the answer I have given for Question No. 2020/4715 https://www.london.gov.uk/questions/2020/4715

Economy recovery meetings Question No: 2020/4717 Susan Hall Please list the number of meetings held specifically between the Night Czar and the Deputy Mayor for Business since lockdown began in March 2020, the subject of those meetings, and the outcomes of those meetings. Economy recovery meetings The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I refer the Assembly Member to the answer I gave for question, MQ2020/3685, on 15th October. https://www.london.gov.uk/questions/2020/3685 The appendix table in that question includes details of all the Night Czar’s meetings with my Deputy Mayors since the beginning of March. For meetings she has had with Deputy Mayor for Business since November please see the Appendix. Appendix: Economy recovery meetings Question No: 2020/4717 Susan Hall Please list the number of meetings held specifically between the Night Czar and the Deputy Mayor for Business since lockdown began in March 2020, the subject of those meetings, and the outcomes of those meetings.

Date Meeting with: Activity 3 Nov Deputy Mayor for Meeting of the SCG Business & Economic Impacts sub- 2020 Business and other group to take views on keys asks, risks and issues of the key stakeholders upcoming planned four-week lockdown.

Page 208

13 Deputy Mayor for SCG Business & Economic Impacts Sub-group Nov Business and other 2020 key stakeholders 18 Deputy Mayor for London Covid Business Forum chaired by the Mayor to Nov Business and other provide a space for the raising of urgent matters 2020 key stakeholders pertaining to the impact of the pandemic on London’s economy, and identifying key actions which can be taken by the Government, the GLA, boroughs, business organisations, to support businesses through the pandemic and as we emerge from it in months to come. 18 Deputy Mayor for London Covid Business Forum follow-up with Mayoral Nov Business and Team arranged by Nick Bowes. 2020 Mayoral Team 20 Deputy Mayor for SCG Business & Economic Impacts Sub-group Nov Business and other 2020 key stakeholders 23 Mayor of London, Pre brief before the Mayor of London’s meeting with Kate Nov Deputy Mayor for Nicholls, UK Hospitality 2020 Business and other colleagues 23 Mayor of London, Mayor of London’s meeting with Kate Nicholls, UK Nov Deputy Mayor for Hospitality to discuss how they could help support the 2020 Business and other Mayor in the asks of Government and to plan for the next colleagues 30/100 days and beyond to recovery Date Meeting with: Activity 24 Deputy Mayor for London Business Reopening Strategy Group. Given the Nov Business and other impact on Business and on London’s economy, the joint 2020 key stakeholders Chairs of the Transition Board, the Mayor of London and the Secretary of State for MHCLG, have agreed on the importance of establishing the Business Reopening sub- group. The Strategy Group will report to the London Transition Board and run in parallel with the establishment by the Mayor and London Councils of separate arrangements to plan for and oversee the capital’s longer- term economic and social recovery, and HM Government’s work on recovery. 25 Deputy Mayor for Follow up to London Covid Business Forum arranged by Nov Business and other Dep Mayor of Business 2020 key stakeholders 27 Deputy Mayor for SCG Business & Economic Impacts Sub-group Nov Business and other 2020 key stakeholders

Page 209

4 Dec Deputy Mayor for SCG Business & Economic Impacts Sub-group 2020 Business and other key stakeholders 11 Deputy Mayor for SCG Business & Economic Impacts Sub-group Dec Business and other 2020 key stakeholders 16 Deputy Mayor for London Covid Business Forum chaired by the Mayor of Dec Business and other London 2020 key stakeholders 18 Deputy Mayor for SCG Business & Economic Impacts Sub-group Dec Business and other 2020 key stakeholders

Deputy Mayor for Business meetings (1) Question No: 2020/4718 Susan Hall Please list the number of meetings held by the Deputy Mayor for Business and London borough leaders (including which boroughs) since lockdown began in March 2020, the subject of those meetings, and the outcomes of those meetings. Answer for Deputy Mayor for Business meetings (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Business meetings (2) Question No: 2020/4719 Susan Hall Please list the number of meetings held between the Deputy Mayor for Business and the taxi trade since lockdown began in March 2020, the subject of those meetings, and the outcomes of those meetings. Deputy Mayor for Business meetings (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Deputy Mayor for Transport Heidi Alexander is the member of my team who is responsible for engaging with stakeholders representing taxi and private hire drivers alongside TfL. In addition to the frequent conference calls TfL has held with the industry since the pandemic, Heidi met with the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) on 5 June regarding the Streetspace Programme. Heidi most recently met with taxi stakeholders, including the

Page 210

London Cab Drivers Club (LCDC), United Cabbies Group (UCG), RMT Taxi Branch, Unite and the LTDA, on 15 December. TfL and I recognise the difficulties faced by both taxi and private hire drivers. This is why I have written to the Treasury to ask for the provision of targeted financial support and in the coming weeks TfL will be distributing 1.5 million face masks and 30,000 bottles of hand sanitiser for drivers.

Economic impact of COVID-19 across London Question No: 2020/4720 Susan Hall Please publish any analysis undertaken by the Deputy Mayor for Business which specifically focuses on the economic impact of COVID-19 across different areas of London, including any variation in impact between inner and outer boroughs. Economic impact of COVID-19 across London The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Since March, the Deputy Mayor for Business and GLA officers have analysed the business and economic impacts of COVID-19 on a regular basis, closely supported by GLA Economics. The GLA frequently release publications on the state of London’s economy. There are two regular publications - London’s Economy Today (LET) and London’s Economic Outlook - as well as additional individual publications. The LET is published at the end of every month, with the latest released on 26 November 2020. The Latest London’s Economic Outlook was released on 7 December. The Mayor has also commissioned a major piece of research into the future challenges and opportunities facing the Central Activities Zone which should inform understanding of the long-term impacts on the variation in impact between inner and outer London. This work will involve robust analysis and evidence gathering, scenario development and policy implications.

Impact of COVID-19 on workers (1) Question No: 2020/4721 Susan Hall Has the Deputy Mayor for Business undertaken any specific work on the impact of COVID- 19 on the self-employed in London? Impact of COVID-19 on workers (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My Deputy Mayor for Business, Rajesh Agrawal, has played a key role in our response to the pandemic, making sure regular updates are fed back to me from his meetings with the

Page 211

business community as well as his meetings chairing the Business and Economic Impacts sub-group of the pan-London Strategic Coordination Group. This has included focus on support for the self-employed. As a result, I have repeatedly pressed the government to close gaps in eligibility in the Self Employment Income Support Scheme. The impact of COVID-19 on self-employed Londoners has been profound. GLA figures show that up to 200,000 self-employed workers are being excluded by the Government from support, in most cases because they are either newly self-employed, receive a mix of PAYE and self- employed income, or company directors. My Economic Development and Culture teams are funding ongoing research from Centre for London on the future of self-employment in London, covering the impact in sectors most affected by Covid-19 restrictions, and making recommendations for further action to the Deputy Mayor for Business.

Impact of COVID-19 on workers (2) Question No: 2020/4722 Susan Hall Has the Deputy Mayor for Business undertaken any specific work on the impact of COVID- 19 on freelancers and gig economy workers in London? Impact of COVID-19 on workers (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Freelancers and gig economy workers cut across the responsibilities of my Deputy Mayor for Business, Culture & the Creative Industries, and Night Czar, who have all played important roles in our pandemic response. The Deputy Mayor for Business feeds back regularly from his meetings with the business community. He chairs the Business and Economic Impacts sub-group of the London Strategic Coordination Group. I and my deputy Mayors have called on government to close eligibility gaps in the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme and ensure that gig economy workers have adequate sick pay protection if they need to self-isolate. The Culture Unit hosted a roundtable with freelancers in March to identify their immediate needs and has continued to lobby central government on their behalf. The GLA is funding research from Centre for London on the future of self-employment in London, particularly sectors where freelancer and gig economy work is most prevalent.

Impact of COVID-19 on workers (3) Question No: 2020/4723 Susan Hall Has the Deputy Mayor for Business undertaken any specific work on the impact of COVID- 19 on high street businesses in London?

Page 212

Answer for Impact of COVID-19 on workers (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (1) Question No: 2020/4725 Susan Hall What specific work is the Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement currently working on? Answer for Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (2) Question No: 2020/4726 Susan Hall What specific work has the Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement done to date in relation to London’s recovery from COVID-19? Answer for Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (3) Question No: 2020/4727 Susan Hall How many times have you met with the Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement since lockdown began in March 2020? Please list the number of meetings, the subject of those meetings, and the outcomes of those meetings. Answer for Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community

Page 213

Engagement (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (4) Question No: 2020/4728 Susan Hall How many and with which boroughs has the Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement met with since lockdown began in March 2020? Answer for Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (5) Question No: 2020/4729 Susan Hall What specific actions did you task the Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement with to contribute to London’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic? a) How many actions has she achieved, b) How many actions remain outstanding, and c) What Key Performance Indicators did you ask her to perform against? Answer for Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility, Community Engagement (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Help for businesses Question No: 2020/4730 Susan Hall What percentage of London’s businesses do you estimate City Hall initiatives have engaged with (in some form) since lockdown began in March 2020? Help for businesses

Page 214

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 It is not possible to accurately determine the extent of engagement with GLA initiatives as a percentage of businesses in London, not least because much of our engagement work is through our network of partner organisations. For example, we are continually engaging with London’s boroughs, business groups and sectoral bodies, as well as business support providers who in turn engage their extensive business networks in GLA-funded initiatives. My Business Advisory Board, London Covid Business Forum, the SCG Business and Economic Impact Subgroup, the London Business Board and the business-led London Economic Action Partnership, all of which provide avenues of direct engagement with business leaders, are at the heart of our ongoing work to support London’s economy, providing valuable insight and advice at this difficult time. Since the beginning of the Covid-19 Pandemic, I have been offering a series of support services and grants to support businesses during these difficult times. Through the London Business Hub alone we have engaged with around 110,000 new users via our website, 8,000 businesses on a bi-weekly basis through the London Business Hub newsletter and we have achieved approximately 8,000 profile visits through social media. In addition to this, we have provided one-to-one and one-to-many support to over 1400 SMEs. In terms of specific interventions to engage and support London’s businesses, these include: – Peer to Peer Networks – Pay it Forward London – Back to Business Fund – London Resilience Fund – Property Advice Service – Recover and Grow – London Business Hub Advisers – Covid-19 Recovery Grants – Business Growth Programme – Mayors International Growth Programme – Investment Readiness Programme Government funding provided to London for business support amounts to 80 pence per business in London and therefore without significant additional funding, our outreach and support has to be targeted at specific businesses and business needs.

Honour-based childhood abuse offences Question No: 2020/4731 Susan Hall Presenting the data by year since 2015/16, please provide a breakdown of the number of honour-based childhood abuse offences?

Page 215

Answer for Honour-based childhood abuse offences The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Help for night-time venues Question No: 2020/4732 Susan Hall What percentage of London’s night-time venues do you estimate City Hall initiatives have engaged with (in some form) since lockdown began in March 2020? Help for night-time venues The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s night-time venues have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Culture at Risk Office has supported 155 night-time venues since March 2020. My London Business Hub Advisors have provided up to 12 hours of one-to-one advice for over 189 creative businesses, including night-time venue operators. My £2.3 million Culture at Risk Business Support Fund is providing emergency funding and dedicated advice and guidance to sustain night time venues most at risk of falling into administration due to COVID-19. Many of these venues were unable to benefit from Government schemes and Arts Council England funding. To date, £2 million has been distributed in grants to 18 grassroots music venues, 11 LGBTQ+ venues, 15 independent cinemas and 82 artist workspaces across London, supporting 11,500 individuals. In addition, my Pay It Forward London and Back to Business Funds helped at least 77 night- time businesses.

Help for London’s cultural venues and businesses Question No: 2020/4733 Susan Hall What percentage of London’s cultural venues and businesses do you estimate City Hall initiatives have engaged with (in some form) since lockdown began in March 2020? Help for London’s cultural venues and businesses The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture and creative industries have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Culture at Risk Office has supported nearly 700 cases since March 2020, and London Business Hub Advisors have provided up to 12 hours of one-to-one advice for over 189 creative businesses. My Creative Enterprise Zones programme has supported over 300 affected creative businesses and protected over 1000 jobs during the pandemic.

Page 216

My £2.3 million Culture at Risk Business Support Fund is providing emergency funding, advice and guidance to those most at risk of falling into administration due to COVID-19. Many of these venues were unable to benefit from Government schemes and funding. To date, £2 million has been distributed in grants to 18 grassroots music venues, 11 LGBTQ+ venues, 15 independent cinemas and 82 artist workspaces across London, supporting 11,500 individuals. The fund is also providing access to advice and guidance to 175 night- time venues. My Pay It Forward London and Back to Business Funds have helped 150 cultural venues and businesses.

Breast ironing offences Question No: 2020/4734 Susan Hall Presenting the data by year since 2015/16, please provide a breakdown of the number of breast ironing offences. Answer for Breast ironing offences The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Help for hospitality Question No: 2020/4735 Susan Hall What percentage of London’s hospitality businesses do you estimate City Hall initiatives have engaged with (in some form) since lockdown began in March 2020? Answer for Help for hospitality The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Violence at Supermarkets Question No: 2020/4736 Susan Hall Presenting the data monthly to November 2020 for the past three years, please provide a breakdown of the number of violence against the person offences at London supermarkets? Answer for Violence at Supermarkets The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 217

Officers are drafting a response

Retail violence Question No: 2020/4737 Susan Hall Presenting the data monthly to November 2020 for the past three years, please provide a breakdown of the number of violence against the person offences at London retailers? Answer for Retail violence The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Corner shop violence Question No: 2020/4738 Susan Hall Presenting the data monthly to November 2020 for the past three years, please provide a breakdown of the number of violence against the person offences at London corner shops? Answer for Corner shop violence The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

The Mayor’s Culture Strategy (1) Question No: 2020/4739 Susan Hall How many objectives have been achieved in the Mayor’s Culture Strategy to date? The Mayor’s Culture Strategy (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My Culture Strategy, Culture for All Londoners, is the most ambitious culture strategy of any administration to date. In March 2020, I published a One Year On report outlining achievements up to March 2020. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/oneyearon_web_upload.pdf We are making progress across the full range of activities set out in the strategy, and achieved the following since March 2020: Brent’s 2020 London Borough of Culture programme; launching a £1.3m skills programme in three Creative Enterprise Zones;

Page 218

unveiling the 13th Fourth Plinth sculpture, ‘THE END’ by Heather Phillipson; launching the Thames Estuary Production Corridor Case for Investment and the capital’s largest film studios in Dagenham; and delivering an online World Cities Culture Forum with cities across the world. In response to COVID-19, our Culture Unit has also pivoted to aid our recovery from this pandemic. We’ve expanded our Culture at Risk office, provided emergency funding of £2.3m to London’s creative and night time businesses, and launched new funds for Community Spaces at Risk and community recovery projects, through Make London.

The Mayor’s Culture Strategy (2) Question No: 2020/4740 Susan Hall How many of the policy and actions have been achieved in the Mayor’s Culture Strategy to date? (Beginning at Page 160 of the document). The Mayor’s Culture Strategy (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My Culture Strategy, Culture for All Londoners, is the most ambitious culture strategy of any administration to date. In March 2020, I published a One Year On report outlining achievements up to March 2020. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/oneyearon_web_upload.pdf We are making progress across the full range of activities set out in the strategy, and achieved the following since March 2020: Brent’s 2020 London Borough of Culture programme; launching a £1.3m skills programme in three Creative Enterprise Zones; unveiling the 13th Fourth Plinth sculpture, ‘THE END’ by Heather Phillipson; launching the Thames Estuary Production Corridor Case for Investment and the capital’s largest film studios in Dagenham; and delivering an online World Cities Culture Forum with cities across the world. In response to COVID-19, our Culture Unit has also pivoted to aid our recovery from this pandemic. We’ve expanded our Culture at Risk office, provided emergency funding of £2.3m to London’s creative and night time businesses, and launched new funds for Community Spaces at Risk and community recovery projects, through Make London.

Tube crime Question No: 2020/4741 Susan Hall Presenting the data monthly to November 2020 for the past three years, please provide a breakdown of major crime types for each London tube station?

Page 219

Answer for Tube crime The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Blackmail offences Question No: 2020/4742 Susan Hall From November 2018, for each month, please can you provide a breakdown of the number of blackmail offences? Answer for Blackmail offences The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Kidnappings Question No: 2020/4743 Susan Hall From November 2018, please provide a monthly breakdown of kidnappings Answer for Kidnappings The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Drugs in schools Question No: 2020/4744 Susan Hall For each of the years Nov 16 to Oct 17, Nov 17 to Oct 18, Nov 18 to Oct 19 and Nov 19 to Oct 20, please can you provide how many drug offences in schools have been reported to the police? Answer for Drugs in schools The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 220

MPS flights and hotels costs Question No: 2020/4745 Susan Hall What is the cost of (1) flights, and (2) hotels for MPS officers for 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018- 19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 to date. Please also break down the costs for the flights for each year by first class, business and economy. Answer for MPS flights and hotels costs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Child abuse Question No: 2020/4746 Susan Hall Presenting the data monthly to November 2020 for the past three years, please provide a breakdown of the number of child abuse offences? Answer for Child abuse The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Racist assaults against Met police officers Question No: 2020/4747 Susan Hall Presenting the data monthly to November 2020 for the past three years, please provide a breakdown of the number of racist assaults against Met police officers? Answer for Racist assaults against Met police officers The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Expenses Question No: 2020/4748 Susan Hall For each of the years Nov 16 to Oct 17, Nov 17 to Oct 18, Nov 18 to Oct 19 and Nov 19 to Oct 20, how much has been paid in expenses to staff across GLA bodies?

Page 221

Answer for Expenses The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (1) Question No: 2020/4749 Susan Hall What specific work is the Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries currently working on? Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture, creative industries and night time businesses have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Deputy Mayor, Justine Simons OBE, is supporting this essential part of London’s economy and social fabric, to secure jobs and plan for the safe reopening of cultural businesses. My Deputy Mayor is supporting cultural organisations and creative businesses who have been impacted by the second lockdown and Tier 2 restrictions . She is working with industry to lobby government on the impacts of Tier 3 on London’s economy; advocating for the creative industries in any trade deal with the EU, to mitigate the devastating impacts that a No-Deal scenario would have; co-leading research on supporting London’s crucial Central Activities Zone; and aiding cultural organisations across London in planning for wider reopening in 2021. Under her leadership, my Culture team is delivering on my Culture Strategy, Culture for all Londoners. This includes supporting community recovery through London Borough of Culture, and economic recovery through my Creative Industries Growth Programme.

101 call waits Question No: 2020/4750 Susan Hall How long is the average wait time on 101 calls broken down by year since 2016/17? Answer for 101 call waits The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 222

Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (2) Question No: 2020/4751 Susan Hall What specific work has the Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries done to date in relation to London’s recovery from COVID-19? Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture and creative industries and night time economy have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Deputy Mayor is supporting this important part of London’s economy and social fabric, to secure jobs and plan for the reopening of cultural and creative businesses. My Deputy Mayor has expanded my Culture at Risk Office; launched my £2.3m Culture at Risk Business Support Fund and new Community Spaces at Risk Fund; worked with industry to gather intelligence on the issues faced and support needed; lobbied government on freelancers and support for cultural organisations; commissioned research on the impact of COVID-19; and ensured culture is represented in London’s recovery missions. She’s supported investment in jobs and growth, including the launch of London’s biggest film studios in Dagenham; supporting Film London to get £1bn worth of filming back in production; launching a £1.3m skills programme in three Creative Enterprise Zones; and supporting East Bank to carry on building.

Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (3) Question No: 2020/4752 Susan Hall How many times have you met with the Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries since lockdown began in March 2020? Please list the number of meetings, the subject of those meetings, and the outcomes of those meetings. Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture, creative industries and night time economy have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Deputy Mayor, Justine Simons OBE, is playing a key role supporting this important part of London’s economy and social fabric, to secure jobs and plan for the safe reopening of cultural venues and businesses. I am in regular contact with my Deputy Mayor and we have taken part in numerous virtual meetings and in person visits to support the sector. These have included a recent visit to support cultural venues in central London on 3rd December; at the launch of the capital’s largest film studios in Dagenham East; at the exhibition of works by Khadija Saye in Notting

Page 223

Hill; and in October, when I spoke on a panel of global Mayors which my Deputy Mayor chaired as part of the World Cities Culture Forum.

Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (4) Question No: 2020/4753 Susan Hall How many and which boroughs has the Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries met with since lockdown began in March 2020? Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (4) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture, creative industries and night time economy have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Deputy Mayor, Justine Simons OBE, is playing a key role supporting this important part of London’s economy and social fabric, to secure jobs and plan for the safe reopening of cultural businesses. Since March 2020, my Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries has met with borough leaders and officers across London, including with the Leader of Barking and Dagenham Council on the launch of Eastbrook Studios; a meeting of 11 borough leaders regarding the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm; and in her role on the City of London’s Culture and Commerce Task Force. My Culture Unit has held five virtual meetings supporting culture officers across London, with attendance from thirty boroughs. Through this, my Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries has supported representatives from almost all London boroughs since March 2020.

Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (5) Question No: 2020/4754 Susan Hall What specific actions did you task the Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries with to contribute to London’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic? a) How many actions has she achieved, b) How many actions remain outstanding, and c) What Key Performance Indicators did you ask her to perform against? Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries (5) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London’s culture, creative industries and night time economy have been catastrophically impacted by COVID-19. My Deputy Mayor, Justine Simons OBE, is supporting this important part of London’s economy and social fabric, to secure jobs and plan for the reopening of cultural and creative businesses.

Page 224

My Deputy Mayor has expanded my Culture at Risk Office; launched my £2.3m Culture at Risk Business Support Fund and new Community Spaces at Risk Fund; worked with industry to gather intelligence on the issues faced and support needed; lobbied government on freelancers and support for cultural organisations; commissioned research on the impact of COVID-19; and ensured culture is represented in London’s recovery missions. She’s supported investment in jobs and growth, including the launch of London’s biggest film studios in Dagenham; supporting Film London to get £1bn worth of filming back in production; launching a £1.3m skills programme in three Creative Enterprise Zones; and supporting East Bank to carry on building.

Protest costs Question No: 2020/4755 Susan Hall For each of the years Nov 16 to Oct 17, Nov 17 to Oct 18, Nov 18 to Oct 19 and Nov 19 to Oct 20, what was the total cost for policing protests? Please provide a further breakdown of the five most expensive groups/issues to protest for the same periods. Answer for Protest costs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

London Crime Prevention Fund budget Question No: 2020/4756 Susan Hall Further to the Deputy Mayor for Policing & Crime’s commitment in 2016 to sustain the LCPF budget at £72m for a further 4 years, could you please advise as to whether this commitment has been maintained. If so, please provide details as to how the funding has helped to reduce crime in London boroughs, by providing data for each borough.? Answer for London Crime Prevention Fund budget The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 225

Covid fines Question No: 2020/4757 Susan Hall Since the introduction of Covid fines, please provide a monthly breakdown of how many have been issued? Answer for Covid fines The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Data breaches Question No: 2020/4758 Susan Hall For Dec 18 to Nov 19 and Dec 19 to Nov 20, please provide how many data breaches have occurred in each of the following organisations: • GLA • MPS • TFL Answer for Data breaches The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Data sharing agreements Question No: 2020/4759 Susan Hall For each of the following organisations, please provide a list of current data sharing agreements (With whom and what for) • GLA • MPS • TFL Answer for Data sharing agreements The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020

Page 226

Officers are drafting a response

Victim Right of Review Question No: 2020/4760 Susan Hall For 2020/4188, could you provide updated data to to include November and further for the same period mentioned (June 2020 to Nov 2020) please provide the number of successful VRRs Answer for Victim Right of Review The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Advertising Income Question No: 2020/4761 Susan Hall Can you provide the most up-to-date figures possible regarding TfL’s revenue income from advertising in 2020-21? Answer for TfL Advertising Income The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

TfL Passenger Revenue Question No: 2020/4762 Susan Hall Can you provide an update to MQ 2020/1809 on passenger revenue for as much of 2020- 21 as data is available? Answer for TfL Passenger Revenue The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 227

Green Jobs Question No: 2020/4763 Tony Arbour In your opening remarks at MQT on 19th November you intimated that London has more people employed in Green jobs than construction. Please provide the detail to support this claim. Green Jobs The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The latest interim assessment of London’s low carbon and environmental goods and services sector shows the sector employed 317,000 in 2019/20, see the link. The assessment of the low carbon and environment goods and services sector versus the construction sector is from the London Low Carbon Market Snapshot 2019 published in June last year, see the link. The comparison is set out in Table 3 of Appendix 6 and shows that in 2016/17 the low carbon and environment goods and services sector employed 224,659 people compared with 199,038 in the construction sector in 2016/17.

Planning Application for Stag Brewery, Mortlake Question No: 2020/4764 Tony Arbour In relation to the Planning Application for the Stag Brewery, Mortlake (GLA references: 4172, 4172A, 4172B), can the Mayor explain why the GLA Planning Directorate held 23 meetings between May and October 2020 with the applicant or their representatives for this development, but are unable to provide figures for the number of meetings which were held between GLA Planning and local groups representing the interests of residents? Were any meetings at all held between GLA Planning and residents’ groups between May and October 2020? Will GLA Planning now be consulting with local residents’ groups, given that the November date of the public Representation Hearing has been delayed? Planning Application for Stag Brewery, Mortlake The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The applications were called in on 4 May 2020 to subject them to further scrutiny. GLA officers have met with the applicants’ representatives to discuss various technical elements of the development. Dialogue between the applicant (and their technical representatives) and the LPA during an assessment is routine and reflected in the requirements of the NPPF, which requires LPAs to “work proactively with applicants to secure developments that will improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area”.

Page 228

No direct meetings were held with local residents’ groups in this period. Residents and third parties provide comments and opinions on development proposals to planning authorities through the statutory consultation process, which occurred between 19 August - 27 September and 1 - 31 October. More recently, since postponement of the hearing date, GLA officers have met with two community groups. Further public consultation – which will include local residents - will occur prior to a rescheduled hearing.

London Power (1) Question No: 2020/4765 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor explain why after ten months on from the launch of London Power, up to the end of September 2020, only 3,658 households had signed-up to London Power as their energy provider? London Power (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 As per my answer to MQ 2020/ 2854, this year has been challenging for businesses across the country, particularly those that are just starting out. Marketing for London Power was paused in March as the COVID-19 pandemic hit but was resumed this autumn. I plan to continue to grow London Power in order that more Londoners will benefit from affordable, green energy.

London Power (2) Question No: 2020/4766 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor explain what he is doing to increase the number of households signing up to London Power as their energy provider? London Power (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I launched London Power to provide a fair, affordable and green energy supply option for Londoners. We are communicating the benefits to Londoners. Marketing for London Power was paused in March as the COVID-19 pandemic hit but was resumed this autumn. My officers are also engaging with London boroughs to gain their support in further promoting London Power to their residents.

Page 229

London Power (3) Question No: 2020/4767 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor provide how much London Power’s income has been since its launch? London Power (3) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 London Power will publish an annual report in Q1 2021-22 to evaluate the impact of the company in the first full financial year of operation. This will provide an evaluation of the company’s financial and operational performance over the previous year, where this data is not considered commercially sensitive.

Recycling (1) Question No: 2020/4769 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor confirm whether or not every London Council is delivering a separate kerbside food waste collection service? Recycling (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 My London Environment Strategy (LES) requires all London boroughs to provide a separate weekly food waste collection to properties with kerbside recycling collections. 22 boroughs already offer separate kerbside food waste collections. Two boroughs (Greenwich and Waltham Forest) collect food and garden waste together. Nine boroughs do not currently offer a food waste collection service: Barking and Dagenham, Barnet, Hammersmith and Fulham, Havering, Kensington and Chelsea, Newham, Redbridge, Wandsworth and Westminster. My officers have worked with the eleven boroughs that do not provide a fully separate kerbside food waste collection to set out in their Reduction and Recycling Plans (RRPs) a commitment of how and when they will do this. Greenwich and Waltham Forest have included plans to move to separate food waste collections by 2023. Barnet have committed to reintroducing a food waste service from April 2022. Kensington and Chelsea, Westminster and Hammersmith and Fulham RRPs were approved on condition of a commitment and clear road map of rollout following trials, ideally by 2022 and all three boroughs have now begun to pilot food waste recycling services for the first time. Due to contractual restraints Wandsworth cannot introduce a food waste service before 2024 but have said that they have a trial planned provisionally starting in January 2021 and my officers have asked for an update on this. Boroughs are due to provide me with their first updates to RRPs in January which will include progress against the commitments they have made.

Page 230

The remaining boroughs are the constituent authorities of the East London Waste Authority (ELWA). There are contractual and technological constraints within ELWA’s existing disposal contract which mean the potential for significant service change to waste and recycling services is severely limited. I am aware of numerous contract reviews at national and local level that have found little to no latitude within the contract. I am working with these boroughs to identify what other improvements can be made. Please see also Mayor’s Question 2020/3411.

Recyling (2) Question No: 2020/4770 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor confirm whether or not recycling levels have dropped this year? Recyling (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Annual recycling rates for Local Authorities are published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), usually in November or December of each year. The publication of recycling rates for 2019/20 has been delayed until January or February 2021, due to Covid-related impacts on data reporting and quality assurance within local authorities and DEFRA.

London Pollution Helpdesk Question No: 2020/4771 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor confirm how many schools have called the London Pollution Helpdesk so far? London Pollution Helpdesk The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 By introducing bold measures to tackle pollution in London, I have successfully reduced the number of state schools in areas with illegal levels of pollution from 455 in 2016 to 14 in 2019. However, I am determined to do more to ensure that the air quality around all schools in the city is within legal pollution limits. This is why I will be launching the London Schools Pollution Helpdesk early next year. The Helpdesk will support schools across London to deliver air quality audits, prioritising and proactively approaching the remaining schools in areas still exceeding or nearly exceeding legal pollution levels. It will also support schools to implement audit recommendations, which will help reduce pollution and children’s exposure to it.

Page 231

The Helpdesk will build on my successful School and Nursery Air Quality Audits Programme, which has delivered audits at 50 schools and 20 nurseries across London’s most polluted areas and offered funding support to facilitate the implementation of audit recommendations such as the introduction of School Streets, active travel and engine idling campaigns, and the addition of green infrastructure like green screens. However, whilst officers are finalising preparations and the Helpdesk has been launched, schools will not be able to call on its services.

Air Quality Audits (1) Question No: 2020/4772 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor confirm whether or not applications were received from organisations from Bromley, Enfield and Havering for the Grow Back Greener Fund? Air Quality Audits (1) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The Grow Back Greener Fund supports projects to improve and create green space, focusing on neighbourhoods with poor green space provision and high levels of deprivation. The fund received five applications for projects in Enfield, and three applications for projects in Havering. Unfortunately, these applications were unsuccessful. No applications were received from projects based in Bromley. The Fund was heavily oversubscribed, with a total funding request over seven times greater than the funding available. All applications were subject to a formal assessment process that prioritised projects most closely aligned with the aims of the fund. Projects in these boroughs have received funding through other programmes as part of my Greener City Fund this year, including for greening Valley Primary School in Bromley, and major woodland creation projects in Enfield and Havering.

Air Quality Audits (2) Question No: 2020/4773 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor confirm whether or not funding awarded for air quality measures as a result of the first round of air quality audits had reduced pollution around schools? Air Quality Audits (2) The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have implemented a wide range of bold measures that have improved air quality across the capital. The Ultra Low Emission Zone, for example, has effectively addressed toxic

Page 232

emissions at source thereby helping to reduce the number of state schools located in areas with illegal levels of pollution by 97 per cent. The audits themselves have recommended a variety of measures to be implemented by the schools, boroughs or other organisations, some of which would directly address emissions and others which would reduce exposure to pollution or raise awareness. I offered grant funding of £10,000 to each of the participating schools to kick-start the implementation of their recommendations, which many boroughs matched, and further ringfenced funding from the Greener City Fund to support schools in areas exceeding legal pollution limits to deliver greening measures which would help tackle air pollution.

Our initial estimate is the average reduction of nitrogen dioxide pollution at audited schools of around 22 per cent between 2016 and 2019. An overall evaluation of the audit programme will take place once both the school and nursery programmes are complete in 2021.

North London District Energy Network Question No: 2020/4774 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor confirm in detail what the £1.2million awarded to the North London District Energy Network will specifically deliver? North London District Energy Network The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 This project supports the development of a strategic heat network, decarbonising heat in North London. It will allow the “super” sizing of the heat main from the future Edmonton Energy Recovery Facility so that the heat network is able to capture at least 20MW of waste heat available from the future Edmonton Energy Recovery Facility for supplying into the London boroughs of Haringey and Hackney, for more details see MD2700. Without this funding the proposed sizing of the heat main would only have provided a maximum of 10MW of waste heat for use in a heat network supplying homes in Haringey and Hackney. To upgrade the capacity of the heat network in the future so that it could take more waste heat from the facility and supply more homes would have been much more expensive than this option. This will improve the performance of the incinerator, reducing carbon from connected heating systems by at least 80% compared to gas boilers while providing affordable heating to up to 8,000 more properties in Haringey and Hackney while reducing air pollution from gas boilers and supporting jobs and tackling fuel poverty. The funding enables the heat network to access an additional 20MW of heat from the Edmonton plant. It is also supporting piloting the retrofit of heating systems in existing houses and flats enabling their connection to a local heat network. Connecting existing buildings to heat networks will be an increasingly important part of decarbonising heat in

Page 233

London. This will also support up to 36 jobs associated with the delivery of the overall project.

North London District Energy Network Question No: 2020/4775 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor explain his decision to award £1.2million to the North London District Energy Network as it is linked to the building of the new incinerator at Edmonton which local MPs believe is a project that needs to be reviewed? North London District Energy Network The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have been clear with the Government that London is facing a climate emergency and does not need any further waste incinerator capacity to manage the city’s non-recyclable waste. As I have stated in MQ 2020/1836, the Facility, which was supported by my predecessor, was approved by the Secretary of State in February 2017. An application by ‘Stop The Edmonton Incinerator Rebuild’ for a judicial review of the Government’s decision was unsuccessful in November 2019. The time period for a statutory challenge to the development consent order has now expired. In these circumstances, I am now focused on making sure that this facility, and London’s other existing incinerators minimise their environmental impact by only managing truly non-recyclable waste, maximising electricity generation and capturing the waste heat created during the process and operating to the most stringent air quality standards possible. District energy networks, maximising the use of renewable and waste heat sources, form an important part of my strategy to tackle the climate emergency and get London to net zero carbon. This project supports Enfield, Haringey and Hackney in their efforts to tackle the climate emergency through the development of a multi-borough district energy network that will use the low carbon waste heat that will be available from the new Edmonton Energy Recovery Facility. This will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% compared with conventional gas boilers while reducing air pollution from them.

Low Traffic Neighbourhoods Question No: 2020/4776 Tony Arbour Could the Mayor provide the current nitrogen dioxide levels of streets within and adjacent to all Low Traffic Neighbourhoods schemes that were agreed as part of the Streetspace programme? Answer for Low Traffic Neighbourhoods

Page 234

The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Greenwash Question No: 2020/4777 Tony Devenish Do you agree with Greenpeace UK’s John Sauven, that “this is the golden age for greenwash. Any company that wants to gain the public’s trust and be a genuine green leader needs to put in the hard work first and put up the billboards later”? What exactly have you done over the last four and a half years to help address this problem? Greenwash The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have always been clear that my vision for London’s environment must be driven by evidence and successful real world actions. Over the last four years I have introduced the world’s first Ultra Low Emission Zone, which has reduced roadside concentrations of nitrogen dioxide by over a third, and supported the delivery of over 289 rapid charge points and over 2,000 standard charge points; London has peaked its emissions from 1990 levels and in 2018, emission had fallen by 29% from 1990 levels. Our efforts have been recognised independently through numerous awards, showing the rigour and world leading nature of our actions in London. This includes a C40 Cities Bloomberg Philanthropies Award for the Ultra Low Emission Zone, being the UK’s first National Winner in WWF’s One Planet City Challenge for climate action, Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) awarding London an A grade for climate action for three years running and an EVIE (Electric Vehicle Innovation & Excellence Award) for Public Transport Authority of the Year, in recognition of the progress made on supporting electric vehicles in the capital and have recently been nominated by WRI for a Ross Center Sustaintable Cities or ULEZ. I also agree that everyone, including businesses, must take the climate emergency seriously and take genuine action in line with climate science. Over the past four years I have been working with some of London’s leading businesses through my London Business Climate Leaders initiative which aims to drive action by London’s businesses on climate change. Businesses selected were assessed by CDP and We Mean Business against globally recognised standards to ensure they were industry leaders in tackling climate change and that they were following up on their public commitments. Businesses who did not meet these standards are not able to work with us or receive our endorsement.

Page 235

Support for older Londoners Question No: 2020/4779 Tony Devenish How have you been supporting older Londoners during the pandemic and how are you responding to Positive Ageing in London’s survival plan for older Londoners this Winter? Support for older Londoners The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 The impact of the pandemic on older people has been all too clear – both in terms of mortality and serious illness, but also from the challenges of lockdown and social isolation. The infrastructure established to support shielding and other vulnerable households has enabled my officers to work with partners to disseminate information directly relevant to older Londoners – from maintaining mental well-being through to claiming pension credit and free TV licenses. And, of course, I have successfully dissuaded ministers from withdrawing travel concessions to older Londoners. The London Recovery Programme will provide further opportunities to respond to the priorities of older Londoners, and through my Equality, Diversity & Inclusion Advisory Group I have been able to ensure that stakeholders from the older Londoners sector – including representatives from Positive Ageing in London – are able to play an active role in shaping that programme.

Working from Home Question No: 2020/4780 Tony Devenish Do you agree we used to work from home, but now many Londoners, live at work ? What specifically have you done to ensure Londoners don’t become like hamsters on a wheel? Working from Home The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I have been open that I have found working from home difficult at times. If you thrive on company, mixing with people and sharing ideas, online meetings and fully remote working do not always provide the same experience. Some people have found their working days getting longer- starting earlier and finishing later. Employers need to the right thing by their employees and support them to set clear boundaries and ensure good work-life balance. I have made this clear to the GLA workforce, promoted the practical wellbeing tools from Thrive LDN and offered guidance on homeworking via the London Business Hub. The rollout of the vaccine presents a clear

Page 236

route out of this crisis, and with it a return to London’s offices for those who prefer physical separation of work and life. But for now, in line with Government guidance, we need people who can work from home to do so to help to suppress the virus in London and save lives. Many employers have woken up to flexible working and Londoners are feeling the benefit of that. I am a long- time supporter of flexible working which ultimately is an important tool in supporting better work-life balance, general wellbeing and economic fairness.

Driving Public Excellence Question No: 2020/4781 Tony Devenish With the Bank of England stimulus having reached £450bn since the Covid-19 pandemic began, equivalent to 40 times TfL’s annual budget (the annual GDP of Belgium) is it time that you started spending more time on driving public excellence out of your existing £18bn budget and less time asking, like Oliver Twist, for “more”? Answer for Driving Public Excellence The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Old Oak Common Access Road Question No: 2020/4783 Tony Devenish Will you ask the OPDC to liaise between H&F and HS2 Ltd to try to gain agreement to use Old Oak Common Lane instead of Braybrook Street as an access road as they had committed to do? Old Oak Common Access Road The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 OPDC has already been in close liaison with both HS2 and the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to seek a revised solution for the use of Old Oak Common Lane instead of Braybrook Street for the access HS2 requires to Wormwood Scrubs. Good progress has been made and OPDC is anticipating a planning application from London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham for the alternative access, early in the new year.

Page 237

West Central Air Quality Question No: 2020/4784 Tony Devenish Please provide me with all of TfL’s air quality readings across the West Central constituency over the last 12 months. Answer for West Central Air Quality The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Addison Primary School Modernisation Question No: 2020/4785 Tony Devenish Will you speak with the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to urge them not to remove education space and playground space during the modernisation of Addison Primary School? Addison Primary School Modernisation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I am pleased to see investment in London’s school infrastructure, but it is important that when schools modernise that they ensure that sufficient space is devoted to informal education and play areas. My London Plan recognises the importance of open space for exercise and leisure. In my new London Plan, policy S3, Education and childcare facilities, states that “development proposals for education and childcare facilities should ensure that facilities incorporate suitable, accessible outdoor space”. Furthermore, “development proposals should ensure that there is no net loss of education or childcare facilities, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no ongoing or future need.” London boroughs should follow these policies where planning permission is required for the modernisation of school facilities

Hammersmith Temporary Road Bridge Question No: 2020/4786 Tony Devenish Will you insist TfL takes a temporary road bridge for Hammersmith seriously? Do you agree seven more years without a road bridge is completely unacceptable? Hammersmith Temporary Road Bridge The Mayor

Page 238

Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Transport for London (TfL) has already conducted a thorough analysis of the proposal for a temporary road bridge put forward by Beckett Rankine. I refer you to my answer to your question in October’s Mayor’s Question Time round for further details (2020/3750). With regards to the more recent proposal for a two-deck road and pedestrian bridge put forward by ‘Foster + Partners’ in November, TfL is assisting the Department for Transport and Hammersmith Bridge Taskforce in reviewing this proposal to determine its viability.

London’s Electricity Requirements Question No: 2020/4787 Tony Devenish What research has been undertaken on the cost of upgrading the London electricity grid before all cars can become electric cars? London’s Electricity Requirements The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 To prepare for the mass roll out of electric vehicles (EVs), my officers have convened key London stakeholders, including London Councils, with London’s Distribution Network Operators (DNOs). This is ensuring information including the Mayor’s plans to be net zero are taken into account in the development of DNOs network investment strategies to ensure London’s electricity grid meets demand from EVs and other electrification ambitions. . By knowing where and when network upgrades are likely to be needed, they can then invest in the right places, at the right time. My Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Taskforce, , published a Delivery Plan last year (http://lruc.content.tfl.gov.uk/london-electric-vehicle-infrastructure-ta…).Evidence provided to the Taskforce by National Grid and DNOs indicates that these concerns are either not material or can be mitigated with planning and introduction of coordinated smart response. The regulator (Ofgem) will review all plans, including projected costs, as part of the DNO’s business plan submissions next year https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/system/files/docs/2020/08/ed2_draft_business_pl…. To ensure continued effective planning and coordination I have reconvened the Taskforce and this remains an ongoing area of priority.

Standard of TfL Consultation Question No: 2020/4788 Tony Devenish At last month’s MQT you told Assembly Member Boff that TfL would “continue to do what we do, which is have world-leading consultation with disabled Londoners, continue to have the equality impact assessments that we do.” Can you provide chapter and verse evidence to back up this statement for changes you have made since March 2020?

Page 239

Answer for Standard of TfL Consultation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

20mph Roads Question No: 2020/4789 Tony Devenish Will you commit to making Edith Grove, Finborough Road and Redcliffe Gardens in Chelsea 20mph roads? 20mph Roads The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 In July 2018, Transport for London (TfL) and the Metropolitan Police launched the Vision Zero Action Plan, introducing a programme to lower the speed limit by 10mph on 140km of the TfL Road Network. Under the first phase of this programme, a 20mph speed limit was introduced on the TfL Road Network in Central London in March 2020. TfL is now progressing work to introduce 20 mph speed limits on key TfL Road Network corridors outside Central London. I can confirm that Edith Grove, Finborough Road and Redcliffe Gardens are part of TfL’s next phase of 20 mph speed limits. TfL is also working closely with the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea to coordinate 20 mph speed limits on borough roads.

ACCT NOx Emission Reduction System Question No: 2020/4790 Tony Devenish What evaluation has TfL made of the potential benefits of the ACCT NOx emission reduction system? Answer for ACCT NOx Emission Reduction System The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 240

Cashless Ticket Machines Consultation Question No: 2020/4791 Tony Devenish Before seeking to implement your plan to stop taking cash at ticket machines, will you commit to a full public consultation? Answer for Cashless Ticket Machines Consultation The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Unsafe Junction between Cheyne Walk and Beaufort Street Question No: 2020/4792 Tony Devenish Residents and councillors are anxious and have been for at least twenty years that the Cheyne Walk/Beaufort Street junction, which is on TfL’s TLRN network, is unsafe. Pedestrians regularly report feeling unsafe and I have heard about a number of near- accidents at this location. TfL undertook to address improvements in August 2002 and confirmed that a press button “green man” control would be installed in 2005. This was not achieved and despite numerous subsequent initiatives to address the problem the junction remains unsafe and in safety terms unimproved. Kensington and Chelsea Council fully supports pedestrian improvements at the junction, as does the local amenity society and local residents association. Does the Mayor of London support such improvements; and will the Mayor commit to accelerating TfL sign-offs associated with such a scheme, so that we can improve road safety in Chelsea? Unsafe Junction between Cheyne Walk and Beaufort Street The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 I am committed to delivering a Vision Zero approach to road danger to eliminate all deaths and serious injuries from London’s streets by 2041. I am very supportive of bringing forward pedestrian and cycle safety improvements to the Cheyne Walk / Beaufort Street junction, as well as a high-quality cycle route along Chelsea Embankment. I understand that Transport for London’s (TfL) feasibility studies have highlighted that introducing safer facilities for pedestrians and cyclists without adverse impacts on buses and traffic will require some difficult choices to be made, including restricting traffic movements at the junction. I have asked TfL to continue to work closely with the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea to identify a workable solution.

Page 241

Flu Vaccine Question No: 2020/4793 Tony Devenish What more can you do to publicise flu vaccine take up rates in North Kensington? Will you use the local bus and tube network to press home this vital public health message please? Answer for Flu Vaccine The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Transport Crime Question No: 2020/4794 Tony Devenish Crime on TfL’s Bus and Tube networks had jumped by 30% in the year before Covid. It has fallen since the start of the pandemic but what do you intend to do to ensure this fall is permanent? Answer for Transport Crime The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Covid rules and mental health Question No: 2020/4795 Tony Devenish How are you ensuring the police are balancing enforcing Covid rules with recognising that the restrictions may have caused additional mental health issues ? Answer for Covid rules and mental health The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Road Rage Question No: 2020/4796 Tony Devenish For Dec 17 to Nov 18, Dec 18 to Nov 19 and Dec 19 to Nov 20, please provide the number of road rage incidents in London?

Page 242

Answer for Road Rage The Mayor Last updated: 21 December, 2020 Officers are drafting a response

Page 243 This page is intentionally left blank

Page 244

Appendix 2

Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 17 December 2020

Transcript of Item 4 – Questions to the Mayor

2020/4321 - Metropolitan Police David Kurten AM

Are you satisfied that the Metropolitan Police are currently upholding the Peelite principles of policing?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. It is a source of great pride for London that the Peelite principles of policing by consent with the respect and co-operation of the public still apply. Officers are proud to police with impartiality and without fear or favour. It remains one of our greatest strengths that the police strive to build strong relationships with the public with consent at their core. For nearly 200 years, this has been the basis of policing across the country.

Living up to these principles requires constant vigilance. That is why a system of checks and balances, including the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) and Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) is vital. I am pleased that in recent HMICFRS police effectiveness, efficiency and legitimacy inspections, the MPS was judged to be ‘good’ in relation to legitimacy.

It is vital that our police service retains the trust and confidence of the public and neither I nor the Commissioner is complacent about this. We meet regularly to discuss public confidence and satisfaction levels and I am proud to have appointed London’s first Victims Commissioner to ensure victims’ voices are also heard.

Openness and transparency are vital to building trust and confidence, making it crucial to empower communities to scrutinise the police. That is why the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) co-ordinates both community monitoring groups and independent custody visitors, providing important checks and promoting the rights of Londoners. I am proud that we have maintained a police service that operates largely unarmed, is more diverse than it has ever been, and continues to operate with the overall trust of Londoners in the face of many challenges.

I recognise, however, that there is room for improvement. Levels of trust in the police are not equal across London’s communities and this is something we must address, particularly with black Londoners. My new action plan has been co-developed with communities and the police to secure greater trust and confidence in policing. This co-production shows a willingness to listen to communities and demonstrates that the Peelite principles are very much alive and well.

David Kurten AM: Good morning, Mr Mayor. Thank you for your answer. The Peelite principles are fantastic and should be adhered to at all times.

You mentioned there impartiality. It is one of the principles that the police should constantly demonstrate impartiality to the law. However, that has not been happening over the last six months, particularly in terms of protests, demonstrations and rallies. We do now have in London two-tier policing and there are different approaches taken to Black Lives Matter protests and freedom rallies.

Why is there a difference in the approach taken by police to these rallies? 1 Page 245

Léonie Cooper AM: Chair, enough with this kind of nonsense. Honestly.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not accept there is a difference. The police do police without fear or favour. The short answer to your question is actually looking at the circumstances of the time the Black Lives Matter protests were taking place and the circumstances now and also the regulations, the rules and the law as they were then and are now. The police are quite clear in relation to treating everybody fairly and equally. If there has been a difference over the last nine months in relation to policing protests, that is probably down to the rules and the law as they were at the time and the increase or decrease of the virus rather than partiality from the police.

David Kurten AM: I will give you an example. On Monday this week, 14 December [2020], there was a freedom rally in Parliament Square and the decision was taken to close it down. I was there to observe what was happening. Just a few days before, under the same regulations, on 10 December there was a Black Lives Matter march through Tottenham. It was given an escort by officers of the MPS, despite them marching along the streets chanting, “Take it to the streets. Eff the police”.

There was a clear difference there. Can you explain that difference, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not aware of the two different cases, but what I would suggest to the Member is that if he is unhappy with police conduct, he can make a complaint to the IOPC or raise it directly with the Commissioner. I am simply not aware of the two marches or the differences between the two.

David Kurten AM: I would like to ask you about your thoughts even though you might not be aware. At the 14 December freedom rally that I mentioned, as was also the case on 28 November when there was a large freedom rally in central London - under different regulations, admittedly - there were actions taken that were appalling. You have often spoken about combatting violence against women and girls but it seems that the police tactic there was to push in snatch squads to pick on individual women, pull them off from the crowds, beat them to the ground, put handcuffs on them, surround them with 20 other police officers to that no one could help the women and girls with placards clearly in distress. That is not something that is going to sustain public support for the police.

What do you think about that police tactic, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I cannot comment on the circumstances you have described, but what I can say is that in public order situations there are experienced public order commanders on the ground. There are experienced teams working the control room that can see the various closed-circuit television (CCTV) options. Often for big demonstrations there are also helicopters in the air. The police do communicate with each other and often have to move swiftly in relation to an individual incident.

I am not sure about the example you are describing, but if there is a protest and you are unhappy with the way it is being policed, the sensible thing to do is to raise your concerns with the Commissioner, with the IOPC or at the Police and Crime Committee. You are in a privileged position, being one of 25 Assembly Members who has direct access to the Commissioner and her deputies. What I would encourage you to do if you are unhappy with the way the police are policing protests, please do raise it.

What is important, as you say, is that we police impartially. I am quite clear that it is important police do so.

2 Page 246

David Kurten AM: Sure, Mr Mayor. I have and other people who have raised things, but you are the Mayor of London. You are the Police and Crime Commissioner for London. You are paid £152,734 a year to do that job.

I would like to ask you about something else before I finish my question, which is even more disturbing. On 14 December, a protester was hit over the head by a policeman wielding a baton, fell to the ground and was hit over the head again by that same policeman. There is clear footage of this happening. Do you ever think that it is right that a policeman should hit or try to punch someone in the face? That is a red zone. If someone is hit over the head with a baton, they could die instantly. Is that ever acceptable, Mr Mayor, do you think?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are raising a factual situation and then asking a question that is hypothetical. The police have the equipment to keep themselves safe and to keep the public safe. That includes batons. They also have, for example, the use of taser as well. It is really important that the police are policing by consent and the police in a majority of times do it in a peaceful way. Sometimes, unfortunately, there is a need to use force. I know the Commissioner is examining the use of force in relation to reviews she is undertaking.

The police have to police impartially. They have to police without fear or favour. They are one of the most scrutinised police forces in the world. I speak as somebody who has practised in the area of law around police accountability. Also, I am somebody who, as you remind me, is a Police and Crime Commissioner. If there are concerns that you have or Londoners have or people visiting our city to protest have, then it is important that they raise them through the various channels there are. That includes --

David Kurten AM: Mr Mayor, sorry, I do have to cut you off. I do not have much more time. I am bringing them to you because you are in that position. I will also bring them to [Dame] Cressida Dick [DBE QPM, Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis] and the various bodies that are there to scrutinise the police and take action as well --

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am really happy, Assembly Member, to raise the particular issues you have raised today with the Commissioner, if you want me to do so, Chair. I will do that.

David Kurten AM: Yes. OK. We will do that. OK. I have to finish now. Thank you, Mr Mayor.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Hall, you have a supplementary question?

Susan Hall AM: Yes, I do. Thank you. Mr Mayor, I spoke to Ken Marsh from the Metropolitan [Police] Federation this morning and I believe he has written to you with concerns about the demonstrations this weekend. Over 800 police officers are required to police the demonstrations and it is at a time, apparently, I have been told, when more officers are off work than ever before with COVID-related issues.

What are you going to do to discourage protests and protect the frontline officers at this very dangerous time? As we all know, any of us who have been on these front lines know, they are spat at, they are hit and all sorts of dreadful things. I have never known so many people coming down with COVID. What are you going to do, please?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for raising this and for the way you have raised this. I am really grateful. Ken Marsh, Chair of the [Metropolitan] Police Federation, has written to the Home Secretary and to me, and my Deputy Mayor yesterday responded in the public forum that Ken raised it in. 3 Page 247

You are right. I will be using all the channels I have access to over the course of tomorrow to remind those wishing to come to the protest about the public health reasons you are talking about. These are not officers that we have suddenly found. These officers are doing overtime or are cancelling leave to police these protests. You are right to remind all of us, including me, that we have a pandemic out there. There is a public health crisis and nobody wants our officers abused in the way you describe. That is why we will be working with the MPS over the course of the next 24 and 48 hours to get the best messages out there.

My message to anybody thinking about protesting this weekend is that I would remind you that we are in the middle of a pandemic. The virus is going up. Over the last 24 hours, 47 Londoners have lost their lives due to COVID, including a personal friend of mine. We have a record number of cases at this time of year to do with COVID. The National Health Service (NHS) is stretched in December. January is the busiest month of the year. You going on a protest may inadvertently lead to the virus being passed on when you take it home and give it to a loved one. Please think very carefully about whether you are going to be protesting this weekend.

Susan Hall AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you. Assembly Member Arbour, Deputy Chairman, if you can take charge of the chair whilst the Mayor starts with my question, please? Thank you.

[Deputy Chairman, Tony Arbour AM, in the Chair.]

2020/4543 - Keeping Londoners Safe at Christmas Navin Shah AM

What is your message to Londoners to keep them safe but at the same time be able to celebrate the festive season?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Deputy Chairman. It has been a difficult and distressing year for our city with thousands of Londoners losing their lives, countless families left grieving and millions more struggling with mental health as a result of this terrible pandemic. There has also been a catastrophic economic impact on businesses and workers. Infection rates have recently been rising in the capital and the Government has made the decision to move London into tier 3. The rules Londoners are being asked to follow this Christmas are determined by the Government, but I am concerned that they may be exposing Londoners and the NHS to unnecessary risk.

I am not the only one who is concerned about this. The British Medical Journal and the Health Service Journal have also expressed concern about the Government’s relaxation plans. There is a real concern that NHS services could be overwhelmed in the new year. The Leader of the Opposition has called for the Prime Minister to urgently rethink the Christmas rules. Even [The Rt Hon] Jeremy Hunt [MP], former Conservative Health Secretary and Chair of the Health Select Committee, has said that the Government should listen to the scientific experts on this one.

So far, despite some confusing messages from Ministers about what they are advising people to do this Christmas, there has been no sign that the Government will change the rules it controls to give people the clarity they need. In the absence of Government leadership, I would encourage Londoners to be safe and exercise caution this Christmas. Not only am I urging Londoners to comply with the rules, but I am asking 4 Page 248 them to think very carefully about whether to do as the rules allow. The safest thing you can do is to celebrate with the people you already live with. I also want Londoners to be cautious around New Year’s Eve. I would encourage Londoners to stay home, celebrating just with the people they live with.

The sacrifices we have all made to try to get this virus under control cannot go to waste now. Coronavirus is not taking a break this Christmas. The rollout of the vaccine does not mean that we can stop playing our part to keep cases down. If we work hard to minimise the spread during this Christmas and New Year period, we will save lives and protect the people we love. I know how hard it is to have these conversations with family, but I cannot express how important it is.

Navin Shah AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Unfortunately, it is likely that there could be a spike in cases in the post-Christmas period. Are you worried about the NHS and particularly London hospitals becoming overwhelmed and having difficulties in coping with the health situation across the board?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am. Our NHS [staff] have worked incredibly hard over the last nine months. They always work incredibly hard. I spoke yesterday to the head of the London Ambulance Service and this morning I have been in contact with the NHS. In six of the seven regions across the country, we are seeing a big rise in NHS general admissions. We also know that the northeast of London has been helping our friends in Kent and Essex in relation to mutual assistance to those parts of the country. January traditionally is the busiest month of the year for the NHS. We have already seen, I am afraid, in London some ambulances having to wait in queues to get into emergency departments because of the pressure in December. That is usually a January issue. That is why it is really important we do not act in a way that inadvertently leaves the virus spreading, leading to people being hospitalised at the busiest time of the year. We still very much want, Chair, non-COVID patients to receive the care they need. I am thinking of cancer patients and other patients as well. We saw in March, April and May [2020] the consequence of non-COVID patients not receiving the care they need. It is really important that we do all that we can to stop the NHS being overwhelmed in January.

Navin Shah AM: Mr Mayor, finally, what measures do you think you and the borough councils can take to stop breaches of COVID guidelines that do not allow the mixing of households after Christmas?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes, we saw last week some really good work by councils across London providing mutual aid to other councils who were having difficulties. We had central London councils providing officers to go to other parts of London. It was fantastic to see high-visibility council officers giving that messaging on busy high streets about COVID.

In January [2021] you are going to see, I am afraid, potentially, the virus spreading across all 32 boroughs. It already is, by the way. Every single borough in our city has the virus going up. This idea that you can somehow balkanise some councils is ridiculous. That is why it is really important that we continue to work as Team London. The silos have gone.

This is a really good example of London leaders, cross-party, inner and outer, working closely together with the NHS, Public Health England (PHE), City Hall and other key partners across our city. That working together will be even more important in January because we share information on a daily basis that helps us take action. We have to make sure that work carries forward in January, which could be the most difficult part of this period.

Navin Shah AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. 5 Page 249

[The Chair, Navin Shah AM, resumed the Chair.]

2020/4292 - Air pollution above WHO limits Caroline Russell AM

Are you concerned that London’s air still contains particulate matter above World Health Organisation (WHO) limits?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. Yes. We know that poor air quality remains the biggest environmental risk to health and yesterday the Coroner concluded that air pollution played a role in the tragic death of nine-year-old Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah in 2013. This must be a turning point so that other families do not have to suffer the same heartbreak as Ella’s family.

I have taken bold action to tackle air pollution in London. The changes I have made since 2016 have led to a 94% reduction in the number of Londoners living in areas exceeding legal limits of nitrogen dioxide and a 97% reduction in the number of state schools in areas exceeding these limits.

However, despite a 15% reduction in particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) since 2016, 99% of Londoners still live in areas exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) PM2.5 guidelines.

I am proud that London was the first major world city to make the Breathe Life pledge to achieve WHO PM2.5 guidelines by 2030. I have adopted this target in my Environment Strategy. A Greater London Authority (GLA) report published in October 2019 showed that through the delivery of my policies and with additional powers and funding, it is possible for London to meet this target. Road transport is the largest individual source of local PM2.5 emissions. I have taken real action to tackle this, including accelerating the introduction of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) in 2019, cleaning up the bus and taxi fleets, and investing hugely in walking and cycling.

However, I have more limited powers to tackle non-transport sources of PM2.5, which account for around 70% of local emissions. This includes construction machinery, woodburning, river vessels and commercial cooking. Much of the PM2.5 measured in London comes from sources outside of the city, meaning a national approach is needed. Alongside other city leaders, I continue to call on the Government to use the Environment Bill to make the WHO PM2.5 guidelines legally binding and provide the new powers needed to clean up our polluted cities by 2030.

London is on track to meet legal pollution limits for nitrogen dioxide by 2025, a milestone that will have taken 193 years but for our policies over the last four and half years on air quality.

Caroline Russell AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Today is the day after Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah, a brave and very remarkable woman who campaigned for years, had toxic air, mainly from traffic, recognised as the cause of her daughter Ella’s death back in 2013. This changes everything for elected members at every level of government. All of us in this virtual chamber and those of us also elected as councillors and Members of Parliament (MPs) must now think how we can help protect the Londoners we represent from the harm posed by traffic, tyre wear and exhaust emissions. Ella’s case shows we need action that cuts pollution in London rapidly. The main lever you, Mr Mayor, and local authorities have on this is to cut motor traffic. As the TfL independent review put it last week:

6 Page 250

“Road user charging can discourage private vehicle use and encourage public transport use, reducing congestion and improving air quality.”

Your Transport Strategy does have a traffic reduction target, but it aims for just a reduction of 10% to 15% by 2041. That is 20 years away. Will you strengthen your traffic reduction target and bring it forward as part of planning for any future road user charging?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I say this respectfully; you have taken two minutes to ask a question there. Give me some time to answer it.

We have set out a number of plans already, which are leading to real change. I gave you the evidence from King’s College [London], which is that rather than it taking 195 years, it will take us five years to bring our air within legal lawful limits because of our policies. You will be aware that even bringing the ULEZ forward was very controversial. Many in the Assembly opposed me doing so. We are going to extend that to the North Circular and the South Circular, which means 96% of London will be covered by that policy. I would rather do something now than do something in five years’ time. No major city in the world is using road user charging. There are big questions about the technology as it is. To get the ULEZ rolled out to the North Circular and the South Circular by next October [2021] is going to be a big challenge. We are already, as you will be aware, rolling it out across all of London for the big vehicles as well. We have also seen a major transformation in relation to us trying to lead to modal shift, avoiding a car-led recovery and encouraging people to use public transport safely where they can and to walk and cycle as well. What is really important is that we persuade the Government to provide us with the additional powers and resource we need.

Caroline Russell AM: Mr Mayor, the conclusions of the TfL independent review say that you should not just investigate a Greater London boundary charge but also a distance-based scheme with new technology, which is something I have long advocated for. To be very clear, all your charges currently are area-based, but that does not help reduce miles driven. Once an area charge is paid, there is no incentive to drive less that day.

Will you look at smart distance-based options, which will actually help reduce pollution, especially for people living by main roads?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We are in danger of making an argument where there is not one. My Transport Strategy, which I can send to you, already makes it quite clear that we are going to explore those sorts of technologies. I have already made it quite clear that the concern is that we are not quite ready in relation to the technologies.

What we are doing is going on with what we can to make speedy change. You will be aware that because of our policies, we have already reduced the amount of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in our city, particulate matter (PM) and carbon. You have seen the numbers in relation to 94% fewer homes in areas where the air is unlawful and the 97% reduction in relation to schools.

What is wrong is for you to give the impression we are against that technology. We are looking into it and my Transport Strategy is quite clear about that.

Caroline Russell AM: OK. I am glad you are looking into it. Thank you. What I am worried about is that Londoners are going to look at all the actions they have been told about on air pollution and think that the problem is actually solved. I warned you back in 2017 in my response to the original consultation on the wider 7 Page 251

ULEZ that all of London was breathing air with particulates that are above WHO limits. Time is running out. We need to get on with cutting traffic, not raising it with things like the Silvertown Tunnel, but I have no further questions. I am out of time.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you. Assembly Member Cooper?

Léonie Cooper AM: Thanks very much, Chair. Mr Mayor, I agree with a lot of what you have been doing. Since May 2016 you have been moving as fast as you possibly can with consultations and moving ahead with implementing the Toxicity Charge (T-Charge), the central London ULEZ and the wider London Low Emission Zone. The first Mayor of London also implemented a lot of actions around addressing climate change and cleaning up the air with the Congestion [Charge] Zone.

Unfortunately, between 2008 and 2016, there was an intervening Mayor and it was in 2013 when Ella [Adoo- Kissi-Debrah], sadly, died. In 2012, the WHO said that diesel was definitely carcinogenic. The number of diesel vehicles between 2012 and 2016 on London’s roads went up by 500,000. You are going as fast as you can. Unfortunately, you started from a poor place because you were undermined by your predecessor. There is now a candidate for the London Mayor, at least one, who is suggesting that expanding the ULEZ would be a mistake.

I just wondered if you would comment on how foolish it might be to reject that and to also reject a number of your other very good initiatives to clean up our air. Thank you.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yesterday’s narrative verdict from the Coroner should be a wake-up call to those people, like the candidate you referred to standing to be the Mayor, in relation to the dangers of air pollution. The Coroner concluded that air pollution was a factor in Ella’s death. It was not asthma that came just by virtue of Ella being Ella. Air pollution was a factor. I am someone who has adult-onset asthma caused, experts think, by the poor-quality air in our city. There is a link.

There are some people who deny that. There are some people who have opposed actively our policies to bring in the ULEZ in 2017, opposed our policies in relation to bringing forward the North Circular and South Circular to 2021, opposed our policies in relation to Low Emission Bus Zones and are opposing some of our policies in relation to encouraging people to cycle. They want to remove the protected cycle lane outside the Houses of Parliament. Londoners are smarter than that. I am hoping that over the next five months, rather than having my opponent propagating lies, we can have an honest debate about the merits and demerits of these sorts of policies.

Léonie Cooper AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. Thank you, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you. Before I bring in the next Member to ask a question, can I just make one point? No matter how strongly and passionately you feel about your question or viewpoint, when you are speaking, please make your point. Can I request the other party not to intervene or speak over the other party. It does not look good and it does not serve any purpose.

With that request to all Members and the Mayor, can I invite Assembly Member Arbour to ask his question about the future of City Hall? Thank you.

8 Page 252

2020/4768 - Future of City Hall Tony Arbour AM

The departure of the Mayor and Assembly from City Hall puts the future of this iconic landmark at risk. Will you support a proposal for the building to be statutorily listed as being of architectural and historical importance?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. London is exceptionally rich in the heritage of its buildings. They form a key aspect of London’s historic environment and have enriched the lives of Londoners past and present.

There is a statutory system for listing buildings in England. Anyone can make a nomination and it is the responsibility of Historic England to assess any nominated buildings and make a recommendation to the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, who makes the final decision. Historic England advises that it is unusual for buildings under 30 years old to be listed as they have yet to stand the test of time. Construction of City Hall commenced in 2000, which means that it is still some way off meeting this threshold.

Statutory listing is not the only way, though, for people to understand that a building is iconic or otherwise has important value for Londoners. For example, a number of architectural awards and programmes provide an avenue for the public recognition of buildings apart from the listing process. I am a programme partner of Open City and for many years City Hall has taken part in the annual Open House London event. This is an active way of celebrating the building and ensuring that it is shared with and appreciated by as wide an audience as possible. I would encourage the ongoing inclusion of the building in this event in the future even if it transfers to private usage.

I am sure that City Hall has a full life ahead of it, with the potential for a number of different incarnations. I am confident that good use will be made of the building for many years to come and that it will continue to have landmark status in the architectural vernacular of our city.

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. I am extremely disappointed by your answer. Indeed, it is true that it is unusual for a building less than 30 years old to be listed, but there is provision for this to be done if they are of special architectural or historic interest. Nobody could doubt that City Hall is of special architectural interest. Although you and I may be ephemeral players in London government, London government is going to continue and City Hall will be a monument to London government if it survives. The listing of a building will ensure that it does survive. I do not share your confidence that this building - or rather the building where the Chair is, which is the current home of London government - will survive without some sort of protection. This is a relatively small building on an extremely valuable site. If it does not have that protection, there is a risk that it will go.

There cannot be a single person in London - certainly there cannot be a single person who is connected with London government - who does not believe that this is a building of architectural interest. They may not think it is beautiful. Secondly, there is no one who cannot believe that City Hall is already an important part of the landscape and it will be a dereliction of our duty - and I suggest your duty as incumbent Mayor - to ensure that this building survives. I would suggest to you that the way you can see that it survives is to apply to the Department [for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport] for this building to be listed. I have no doubt that a request from you - and, I have no doubt, supported by most Londoners - would be supported. Can I ask you, please, to take action, not hide behind the fact that it is unusual? Something that is unusual, in fact, is something which has considerable merit. Indeed, this may be a way in which you could be remembered. 9 Page 253

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I say, Chair, that the Deputy Chairman raises really powerful points very persuasively. Can I discuss with him after this meeting what we can do working together to address the concerns he has? He raises really powerful points. As often, his experience is useful here. I am more than happy to work with him and the Assembly. He is right. Even though we may be leaving next year, this building has huge significance. Chair, this is a good example of me being persuaded by the Deputy Chairman. Can we take this away, Tony, and work on what we can do together?

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. I am grateful to you.

2020/4660 - Financial Performance Shaun Bailey AM

Are you satisfied with your performance on financial and budgetary matters during your tenure?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. The GLA’s financial management is underpinned by a comprehensive budget process, given a clean bill of health by our external auditors in our latest accounts. It is subject to extensive scrutiny by the Assembly as well as consultation with the public. This process has successfully delivered a balanced budget on time year after year, with reserves maintained at prudent levels, demonstrated again in my consultation budget this week.

Since 2016, we have successfully utilised the GLA group’s budget to deliver for Londoners. This includes laying the foundations to fix London’s housing crisis by starting a record number of council homes, taking the boldest action of any city in the world to tackle air pollution, making transport more affordable for millions of Londoners, supporting the police in tackling crime in the face of huge Government cuts, and providing for the London Fire Brigade in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower fire.

This is a clear turnaround from the mess I inherited from my predecessor, who, amongst other things, closed 76 police stations and front counters, closed 10 fire stations, cut £100 million from the London Fire Brigade, wasted £45 million on a bridge that was never built, wasted £280 million on a vanity bus with no opening windows, and increased TfL borrowing by £7 billion.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on our city’s public finances this year, just as it has across the country. We are facing the perfect storm of increased costs associated with responding to the crisis, a collapse in revenue and no confirmed details of support from the Government. As a result, we will be forced to make significant cuts over the next two years. I will do everything I can to protect frontline services by making savings and using the reserves we prudently built up before the pandemic hit, even though the Assembly’s Budget and Performance Committee was sceptical about this.

The Government has a clear choice: invest in London’s economic recovery to avoid cuts and help families and communities get back on track or introduce a new era of austerity that will choke off growth and hit our public services, including TfL and the police, at the worst possible time.

There is no doubt, Chair, we face huge financial challenges, but I am confident in the financial management arrangements we have in place and I will continue to stand up for London.

10 Page 254

Shaun Bailey AM: Good morning, Mr Mayor. Thank you for your answer. I want to concentrate on our finances going forward. While Londoners are worried about their jobs and making ends meet, even GLA staff, it has been widely reported that your senior adviser is based in a different time zone in San Francisco, working eight hours behind hardworking GLA staff. Why did you sign this off?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, you will be aware that I have to be very careful talking about staff members in relation to such matters, but what I can confirm is that the member of staff who is being referred to for personal reasons began working part-time for a short period of time and will be going back to full-time in the new year.

Shaun Bailey AM: Why did you sign this off? They are in a different time zone. Surely they cannot produce the work that we need done right now. You said we face great financial difficulty, which means that a member of staff - a very senior member of staff who is personally responsible for relationships with the Government - surely should be here doing the job.

Is it acceptable that your highly paid adviser, who is personally responsible for liaising with the Government, is based in San Francisco when we have a pandemic to deal with?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have many examples across government - central, regional and local - where staff for personal reasons have to work part-time or take time off. It is not unusual. It is really important that as a good employer we provide the flexibility to our staff. We, for example, have employment practices in relation to those members of staff who have babies early or, for example, those members of staff who have disabilities. That flexibility is really important in the modern world. Particularly this pandemic has shown the importance of having flexibility around working environments.

I am disappointed that people are seeking to make political points around us having the flexibility to give our staff part-time working arrangements for short periods of time before they return to full-time working.

Shaun Bailey AM: The point here, Mr Mayor, is that London needs all of its resources to make the best deal with the Government. You talked about the hard work being done, but surely your team is weakened when this individual is responsible for sign-off and they are eight hours behind.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let us compare and contrast me agreeing to a member of my staff going part-time to the Government giving a £45,000 pay increase to somebody who broke COVID rules by driving to Barnard Castle. I am really happy to have a comparison of my advisers and the work they do, paid part-time for part-time work, with Government advisers employed by the Conservative Government, who get a £45,000 increase even though they break the rules. I am happy to compare my record with anybody.

Shaun Bailey AM: Let us be clear, Mr Mayor. This is about you. It is not about the Government. Of course, this member of staff went to San Francisco. We need to know when. There are allegations that the rules were broken. Can you confirm? How does a member of staff enter the United States of America (USA)?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is quite clear from the letter written by the Chief Officer to the Assembly Member - who is a mayoral candidate - that his arguments are nonsense. If the arguments were not nonsense, he would have pursued this matter further with the Chief Officer. He has not. What he is seeking to do is make cheap points here, Chair, for a short clip seen by a couple of people to try to earn some additional points. Londoners know that this is a candidate who is using lies and fantasies to try to get votes in the next election. Londoners are not stupid. They see through this. 11 Page 255

Shaun Bailey AM: Mr Mayor, you made the comment to compare your record with the Government’s record. There is no travel corridor between the UK and the USA. I am just asking you to confirm how this member of staff entered the USA. You were very vocal about Dominic Cummings [former Chief Adviser to the Prime Minister] and his goings on. Please let us know what happened here. That is all I am asking.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, the proper forum for an Assembly Member to raise issues about staff is with the Chief Officer. What I am not going to do is discuss individual members of staff employed by City Hall through Mayor’s Question Time. I am disappointed that things have got so bad for this candidate that he is using this forum to try to make cheap points. I am not going to rise to that. What I suggest he does is continue to explore this with the Chief Officer, who I am sure will respond to any correspondence he has in relation to this matter.

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): Chair, this is unacceptable for the Mayor constantly to refer to an election that is about to happen. He is abusing his position. There has been no suggestion from the Assembly Member that he is a candidate or that he is involved in any part of the election. He is using this for electioneering. It is an abuse of process. I wonder, Chair, if you would rule on that.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Arbour, you have made your point. I ask the Mayor and all Assembly Members equally to bear in mind not to bring in the party political or election matters. Having said that, Assembly Member Bailey, do you have any further questions about financial performance or shall we move on?

Shaun Bailey AM: Yes, I do, Chair, because the point of this, Mr Mayor, is this staff member is a senior member of staff, a political appointee who is above grade 12 and so we can discuss them in this forum. You should understand that. They are part of the sign-off process with our negotiations with the Government. We have had two bailouts from TfL. We have another one coming. I am asking why you have signed off this member of staff when London is at its greatest time of need. That is what I want to know. You have gone on to say you want to compare your record to Dominic Cummings. Let us be very clear. There is some suggestion here, which you have been unable to rebut, that your member of staff broke the rules. As you said about Dominic Cummings, why should people follow the rules if he does not? We are asking the same thing about you and your member of staff. He is a highly paid member of staff who is vital to London’s financial negotiation with the Government.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Bailey, we know where you are coming from. Mr Mayor, for the last time, can you briefly respond to this if you want to or move on with the wider question? We cannot go any further than that. I do believe that the specific member of staff we have discussed in public, yes, we have allowed that, but we should not be going any further into this. Mr Mayor, do you want to respond to that?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Tony Arbour [AM] was trying to throw Shaun Bailey a lifeline, which he has not taken up. I have nothing further to add.

Shaun Bailey AM: Chair, I am happy to stop here. If the Mayor is unable or unprepared to answer the question, Londoners will see that.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you very much. You have asked your question. I am going to move on to Assembly Member Duvall. You have indicated, Assembly Member Duvall?

12 Page 256

Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much, Chair. If there is ever an abuse of process, it is laying down a question on financial performance and then talking about a member of staff. Please, you are having a laugh.

Mr Mayor, can I ask you a question that concerns the financial performance and the budget issues relating to the GLA group? Can you outline to Londoners, as there are many misleading claims, and actually despicable fake information circulating and warning letters going around the communities at the moment - it has had coverage in a national newspaper about how fake it has been and how inaccurate it is - how much the Government has asked you to raise the council tax by and why?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There are members of the Conservative Party across London saying, “Bring back Zac Goldsmith”, [former Conservative Party candidate for Mayor of London] and we can see why. We have an Assembly Member whom, I am afraid, Tony, is a candidate for Mayor. That is why he is going around telling lie after lie after lie with fake news. I am pleased he has been called out by a national newspaper this week.

There are also candidates from other parties calling out this liar. The best place for us to judge whether he is a liar is on 6 May next year [2021] and --

Keith Prince AM: Chair, I thought you just made a ruling that we should not get into politics and yet you are letting the Mayor rant on and do a party political broadcast. It is outrageous.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Look, I will be the judge of that.

Keith Prince AM: Be even-handed, Chair, please.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Prince, I will be the judge of that. The paperwork that Assembly Member Duvall has raised is about financial matters and the Assembly has had discussions about what the Mayor may or may not raise in terms of the precept levels. It is relevant. I do not believe that the election itself has been discussed, but the fact is that there is paperwork in the public domain that is about the Mayor’s precept, etc. I am allowing this question from Assembly Member Duvall. Please let us leave it at that. Assembly Member Duvall, have you finished your question --

Gareth Bacon AM MP: Chair, before we move on, on a point of order, is it in order for the Mayor to sit there and accuse a London Assembly Member of being a liar in a public forum? I would like your ruling on that, please.

Len Duvall AM: If it is true, it must be.

Gareth Bacon AM MP: Is it true, though? It is a point of view, is it not?

Len Duvall AM: It is true.

Gareth Bacon AM MP: Proven by whom? Chair, you need to rule on this. I have been a Member of the London Assembly for 13 years. I have never, ever heard any Mayor of any stripe accuse a London Assembly Member of being a liar and be allowed to get away with that by whoever is chairing the meeting. I would like a ruling on that.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Look, let us not go into individuals here. Can we please -- 13 Page 257

Gareth Bacon AM MP: No, I am not going into individuals, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Feelings are running high and I accept --

Gareth Bacon AM MP: I am asking you if it is in order for the Mayor to accuse a London Assembly Member of being a liar.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Can we please conduct our comments, questions and answers in the spirit of respect and dignity? Mr Mayor, you were in the middle of responding to Assembly Member Duvall.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. All I am going to say is my final sentence, Chair. We have seen a first today. For the first time in our history, we have seen Tony Arbour, Keith Prince and Gareth Bacon back Shaun Bailey. There is a first.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Let us move on to the next question. Sorry, can we please continue with our business before us?

2020/4724 - Londoners’ Needs Susan Hall AM

How have you adapted your priorities to meet the needs of Londoners since the pandemic began?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. Firstly, I want to acknowledge the profound impact COVID-19 has had on Londoners’ lives, the disproportionate impact it has had on certain communities and the significant impact that measures to control the virus are having on businesses and the economy. Central London’s retail, hospitality, leisure and cultural businesses continue to suffer greatly alongside local high streets and, despite the welcome news of a vaccine, we still have a long winter ahead of us. We must all continue to play our part to keep ourselves and others safe.

Working closely with London boroughs, businesses and the voluntary sector, my priority has been to respond to the pandemic and put in place measures to support communities and the economy. During the first lockdown, we safely accommodated thousands of rough sleepers by securing hotel rooms for them to socially isolate in and co-ordinated delivery of emergency food aid to Londoners in urgent need. I have launched an initiative to support businesses facing uncertainty and financial losses including the London Business Hub, Pay It Forward London, the Recover and Grow programme, the London Resilience Fund, the Culture at Risk business support fund, the Property Advice Service and the peer network scheme. I have lobbied the Government to provide more financial help for the hardest-hit sectors, extend the business rates holiday, abandon the decision to end value-added tax (VAT) free shopping and develop a long-term plan to address the unprecedented jobs crisis this pandemic could still yet cause.

My London COVID Business Forum has set out a practical roadmap to support the reopening and recovery of London’s economy over the coming months. I have also commissioned major research into how COVID-19 and emerging trends will impact on the Central Activity Zone and northern Isle of Dogs in the medium to long term.

To co-ordinate London’s economic and social recovery, together with London Councils, I have set up the London Recovery Board. This partnership takes in membership from public, private and voluntary sectors 14 Page 258 across the city. We have developed nine missions, setting out our recovery priorities to build back better the city’s economy and society. These are being developed through unprecedented engagement with Londoners.

This crisis means we are facing increased costs with responding to the crisis combined with significant lost revenue, with the Government forcing the GLA group to make cuts of nearly £500 million over the next two years to cover this shortfall. My budget repurposing exercise supports London’s recovery while protecting the key projects, programmes and frontline services that Londoners rely on.

Susan Hall AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. You mentioned the money at the end of that statement. You also mentioned at the start of this meeting that your twin priorities are keeping Londoners safe and supporting our city out of the economic challenges that it faces. You have recently allocated around £250,000 to fund your Commission to look at statues, street names and other public realm features. Given what you said earlier, do you really think that this is a priority at this time?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We saw during the pandemic there was an issue raised by David Kurten [AM] in relation to Black Lives Matter and his concern about protests leading to the virus spreading and his concern more so about policing, which is not directly relevant to your question. It is an issue that concerns many Londoners, our public realm and whether we have sufficient diversity in the public realm. It is right to look into issues like squares, street names, blue plaques, statues and other ways to memorialise the contribution made by Londoners of different backgrounds, whether they are women, whether they are black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) Londoners, whether they are from the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, plus (LGBTQ+) community, whether they are disabled Londoners. By asking for various people with expertise to come forward and join the Commission, we can leverage in additional support from other sectors to make sure our city properly reflects the contribution made by our diverse population.

Susan Hall AM: We talked about protests earlier. Do you think that there is a pattern in the way you deal with protests in London? If you think about it, Extinction Rebellion protestors caused absolute chaos. They blocked roads. They cost the MPS millions. You called them allies. You also invited them in for a meeting. People took to the streets during the pandemic, vandalised statues of Churchill and Lincoln and the Cenotaph, and you announced a Commission to look at taking down the statues. Do these actions effectively legitimise the more extreme behaviours of these protests?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am sorry if you do not think the brutal murder of George Floyd had an impact on the lives of Londoners. Many Londoners I spoke to, particularly black Londoners, were traumatised by what they saw in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is not unique to those parts of America or to the USA. Black lives do matter.

It is important to address racism, inequality and discrimination. I applaud those sportsmen and women who are taking the knee at sporting events. I criticise unequivocally those people who boo footballers who take the knee. It does matter setting the right tone. It does matter seeing people in a position of power and influence who look like them, whether it is people wanting to be the Mayor, whether it is the Mayor or whether it is a public street being named after people, whether it is murals, whether it is blue plaques, whether it is statues. The campaign is one that is asking people to recognise there is racism, discrimination and inequality. The Commission is going to be looking at our public realm and seeing whether it does properly reflect our society and whether there should be some changes.

I will give you one example of a change we have introduced that I am really proud of, which was opposed by some members of the Assembly: the first statue of a woman in Parliament Square, Millicent Fawcett. There are 15 Page 259

11 statues of great people. None of them were women. The campaign led by Caroline Criado Perez [British activist] and others led to that statue being unveiled in Parliament Square. I am really proud of that.

Susan Hall AM: Are you? You were asked in June [2020] whether the Commission would lead to some existing statues being taken down. You told the BBC, “I hope so”. Are you prejudging what the Commission may recommend?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, I was asked for my view. That is why I am not part of the Commission. The Commission has experts who will be providing advice. We have already seen across London some people who own statues deciding voluntarily to remove them. We have seen across London people - who I am not responsible for - making the decision to consult in relation to changing the names of streets. That is part of the process of us making sure that we have a well-rounded view of our history. There is nothing wrong with that.

Susan Hall AM: Mr Mayor, I completely support any effort there is to add to and to widen our history, to shed light on the past and to celebrate those deserving people who have not been celebrated before. There is no doubt about that. Whether spending money on this right now as a priority is quite another matter. Our history is our history, warts and all, for better or for worse. While you may well be thinking to add to our history, you do not get to rewrite it, to challenge it or to diminish it.

Would you accept that this is not your call but is the call of London over time to shape itself, not you or your Commission?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The fundamental difference that you and I have is that I accept that our history is written by historians and others. Often, in my view, those people have their own inherent prejudices that can lead to a view of history that may not be rounded. It is really important to have a rounded view of history. When I went to school in London, nobody taught me history lessons in school about the legacy of the transatlantic slavery. I was not taught about the important black role models there were. That does not mean there were not any impressive black people --

Susan Hall AM: Mr Mayor, if I may just interrupt you, it is very nice hearing about your past, but we have only a certain amount of --

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, this is the classic situation. We have a three-minute speech and the answer is not liked by the Member and so she interrupts me. You cannot have it both ways. It is a very British thing --

Susan Hall AM: No, you were talking to me about your --

Navin Shah AM (Chair): One person at a time, please.

Susan Hall AM: Mr Mayor --

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Does history not tell you that?

Susan Hall AM: -- I am stopping you. I am very happy to hear about your history but not on the timer and it is my time. What I say in my time is up to me.

16 Page 260

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am surprised you were not taught the history about respectfully answering a question.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Order.

Susan Hall AM: No, I do not like you destroying or attempting to destroy the history and what has happened in the past of London because very many Londoners are proud of different parts of our history. What happened in the past, whether it was good or bad, refers to the past. You cannot change it, whoever you think you are or what you might do. History is history.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): A question, please.

Susan Hall AM: Leave our statues alone and leave our placenames alone. Thank you, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): All right. Let us --

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, can I ask for some clarity? Is this going to be a situation where Conservative Members make speeches and do not wait for the answer or will there actually be questions that I can respond to? I am guided by you, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): You made a legitimate point. My problem is that at times, as people are virtually participating, I am unable to stop. I have tried and I will keep on trying, but all I can say is to request again and again to the Members as well as to you, Mr Mayor, that this is about questions and answers. Yes, you may want to build up a bit of a scenario for your questions, but please do not go into making speeches. This is not a debating chamber for that. This is questions and answers. This is my request to everyone. I am not identifying any particular individual in terms of blaming them.

If we can move on, also, I have been reflecting about what Assembly Member Bacon said and that was about calling Members names or calling them liars. It does not help the reputation of the Assembly and elected Members. If there are differences of opinion, if there are straightforward interpretations or propaganda put about which is not quite supported by facts, fair enough, bring that up, but do not, please, call other colleagues liars or disrespect them in that sort of manner.

2020/4492 - London’s economic recovery Joanne McCartney AM

The economic figures in the Chancellor’s comprehensive spending review made for very bleak reading, just before Christmas and with further disruption possible depending on a Brexit deal. Do the Government’s plans come anywhere near meeting the support needed by London’s businesses and Londoners, considering the scale of the economic crisis we are all facing, over the coming months and years?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. No, they do not. The scale of the economic crisis facing London and the UK is enormous. UK gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020 is expected to fall by a historic 11.3%. Latest figures forecast London’s economic output to fall by £44 billion this year. London could also see the largest fall in employment in over 20 years with the loss of a further 350,000 jobs in 2021.

17 Page 261

I am deeply concerned that this Government is simply not taking London’s economic importance to the rest of the country seriously. In fact, there are those within the Government who think you can narrow the gap between London and the rest of the country by starving our capital city of investment.

Of course, this is the wrong-headed approach. Whilst it is clearly right to try to support jobs and growth in the rest of the country, the Government should do so while leveraging London’s strengths and advantages, not actively working to suppress them. The Government must not be complacent about the ability of London to bounce back from the COVID crisis with our targeted policy interventions and support.

It is absolutely vital that London gets its fair share of the recently announced Levelling Up Fund not just for the future of our city but for the country as a whole. Just £22.1 million of a recent £900 million fund came to the capital despite us providing an extensive list of shovel-ready projects. Investment in London is investment in the UK. Crossrail, for example, is expected to generate at least £42 billion for the UK and over 60% of suppliers to the project are based outside London. London is home to 13% of the population, responsible for 17% of all employment and 24% of all UK output, and is the nation’s biggest net contributor to the Exchequer.

If the Government continues with its approach of starving the capital of investment while failing to adequately support sectors at risk from the pandemic, it will severely hamper our recovery from COVID both in London and across the UK.

Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. I agree with you entirely. One of the things that surprised me was that even though no deal has been done with the EU and Brexit negotiations are going down to the wire, there was no reference to Brexit in the [Comprehensive] Spending Review at all. Even the Office for Budget Responsibility has said that a no-deal Brexit will hit London hard and increase prices by 1.5% at a time when Londoners are struggling to put food on the table.

What deal do Londoners need to see the Government make with the EU, even at this eleventh hour?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not sure it is possible this late in the day to do the deal that we need. You will be aware that 80% of our economy is in the service sector. Think of world-leading financial, legal and professional services, tech and creative industries. Those sectors will be affected by the flimsy deal the Government is trying to negotiate. They will be adversely affected by that and by no deal as well.

What we ideally wanted was access to a single market and to be members of the Customs Union. I really worry about our ability to attract talent as well as the non-tariff barriers the service sector will have to take from 1 January [2021].

Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you. In your initial answer, you spoke about the levelling-up agenda, but it does seem that the Government is actually seeking to do that by levelling down London. As you quite rightly said, the Government did not allocate London its fair share of shovel-ready projects during the summer. For example, I am very keen that the Piccadilly line in my constituency gets its signalling upgrade, which would then increase capacity greatly.

Will Londoners see the Spending Review as levelling up or levelling down? What case are you building with stakeholders to ensure that London in the future does get its fair share of that Shared Prosperity Fund and Levelling Up Fund?

18 Page 262

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am really worried that there is a divide-and-rule agenda from the Government. It is trying to win votes in the north by punishing London. It is really important that we use our partners within London and across the country who know what is going on to get a better deal. Some Members of the Assembly claim to know our history. If they knew our history, they would know the importance of our city to our country’s wealth and prosperity. That is why it is really important for us to lobby the Government.

We have ordered the trains for the Piccadilly line, but without the signalling we cannot get the real benefits. By the way, the trains are not being built in London. They are being built in the north of the country. You will be aware that if we get more electric buses, these buses will be built around the country in Scotland, Northern Ireland and other parts of the country as well.

That is why we have to try to continue to persuade the Government about the importance of investing in our city. If we are not careful, the country will become more equal not by making the rest of the country wealthier but by making London poorer and the rest of the country poorer as well. We will be more equal but we will all be poorer.

Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Thank you, Chair.

2020/4507 - TfL finances Dr Alison Moore AM

Given that the fares freeze equated to £640 million over four years, less than the monthly TfL running costs, and you inherited Transport for London with a £1.5bn deficit, which you have reduced by 71% to £200 million, do claims that you have “racked up £9.56 billion in wasteful spending at Transport for London” add up?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. The idea that I ever racked up £9.56 billion of wasteful spending at TfL could not be further from the truth. This is a fantasy figure plucked out of thin air. I am aware that this ridiculous claim has been made by the Conservative mayoral candidate and I am aware, too, that he has been busy leafletting homes across London making this assertion. I note he was too embarrassed to put his name on the leaflet, though, instead making it look like an official TfL publication. I have to say that it really does say something when a candidate chooses to distance his campaign not only from his own party but from his own name.

Let me get the record straight and make sure that we use this morning as an opportunity to set it out accurately. The candidate claims that £5.2 billion was wasted on Crossrail. He is categorically wrong. I have stepped up to provide funding when the Government as co-sponsor washed its hands of the project. That is not wasteful. It is essential for London.

He claims that £640 million was wasted on the fares freeze. Tell that to the Londoners who experienced a 42% hike in fares under the previous Mayor and were crying out for more affordable travel. He claims there are more TfL staff with salaries over £100,000 in 2020 than in 2019. That is just plain wrong. There are 17% fewer.

If he wants to talk about wasteful spending, let us look at how City Hall was run by the previous Mayor. £45 million was wasted on a Garden Bridge that was never built, £280 million on buses with no opening

19 Page 263 windows, operating costs for TfL that went up every year, a £7 billion increase in TfL borrowing and 4,600 more people employed by the organisation at the end of his second term than at the beginning.

My record pre-COVID: a 71% reduction in TfL’s operating deficit, a 13% increase in cash balances, £3.5 million saved weekly on reductions in the use of agency and consultancy staff, a freeze on senior staff salaries and an overall reduction in the staff headcount of 5,300. I can hold my head up high when it comes to having delivered financial discipline and rigour in TfL.

COVID has, of course, decimated the finances of the public sector and many in the private sector including the privatised train operating companies and TfL. Londoners know this. They can see the empty seats on our Tubes and buses. As much as my political opponents are trying to pretend otherwise, this is the truth and they would do well to stop taking Londoners for fools.

Dr Alison Moore AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. Can I come back to this issue of the debt interest? The claim is that you have wasted £1.5 billion over four years on debt interest. Would you agree that most of that debt is related to the £9.1 billion in debt you inherited from your predecessor and, in fact, the extra interest that has resulted from the borrowing you have taken out is just £124 million? Is that correct?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is. This gives me a chance to give a history lesson to some Members of the Assembly. The first Mayor borrowed £2 billion to invest in TfL. The second Mayor borrowed more than £7 billion to invest in TfL. What I am doing is paying off the interest on the money borrowed by the previous two Mayors.

Dr Alison Moore AM: In that £124 million that you are paying in interest on your debt, can you highlight some of the things that you have funded by borrowing you have authorised so that Londoners can judge whether those projects were a waste or not?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for your question. We are modernising four lines – this is really important - to get trains running more frequently. We have major station upgrades because of the money that we have borrowed. There are track renewals. As mentioned in a previous question, we have new stock and signalling on the Piccadilly line. Something that I care very passionately about is the step-free projects that have benefited colleagues across London. Those are some examples of the fruits of the money that we have invested in TfL, as well as paying off interest on the money borrowed by the previous guy.

Dr Alison Moore AM: I have one final question because I am quite tight on time. How much of that debt you inherited related to the fantasy Garden Bridge, the fantasy airport and those new Routemasters that needed to be retrofitted?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I can disaggregate for you if you like, but we are paying off the money that was spent by the previous Mayor on projects that did not go anywhere. Where is this Thames Estuary Airport we were promised? Where is this Garden Bridge? We have fixed some of the mistakes he made. The windows now open on those vanity buses. It is really important that we learn the lessons from the mistakes made by the previous Mayor.

Dr Alison Moore AM: Thank you very much. I will leave it there, Chair. Thank you.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): All right. Colleagues, Mr Mayor, the next question, 2020/4782 from Assembly Member Devenish, has been withdrawn. 20 Page 264

2020/4247 - Travel for vulnerable passengers Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM

How will your plans to make the tube cashless support vulnerable passengers, including those without access to a bank account?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. As part of its response to the coronavirus pandemic, earlier this year TfL stopped accepting cash at ticket machines at around 200 London Underground stations, more than three quarters of the network. The change was also made at most Docklands Light Railway (DLR) stations and in London Overground and TfL Rail ticket offices. This has helped with social distancing in ticket halls and reduced the requirement for TfL staff to handle cash, helping to keep staff and customers safe. As we continue to fight the virus, TfL is considering extending cashless operation to most remaining London Underground stations and all remaining DLR stations early next year.

Ahead of any changes that may take place, TfL has been talking to key groups and organisations to address the concerns of those who might find this change challenging. This is helping to inform TfL’s equality impact assessments. TfL’s data shows cash transactions accounted for 2.2% of London Underground journeys in 2018/19. This reduced to 1.25% between July and September 2020. While this is relatively low, I appreciate there are likely to be some people who rely on cash for their transactions who may be concerned about this change. This includes customers who do not have access to a bank account and prefer to pay for their travel by cash.

Customers who need to continue to pay by cash can do so at one of nearly 4,000 Oyster Ticket Stops across London. There are 62 Tube stations currently still accepting cash. The average distance to the nearest Oyster Ticket Stop is 180 metres. Before any changes are implemented, TfL will have a customer communications plan to ensure everyone is aware of the alternative ways they can pay for travel.

TfL ensures staff are fully briefed on any changes and able to advise customers, including directing customers to the nearest Oyster Ticket Stop. Staff are also trained to ensure no vulnerable customer is left stranded. This process will be broadened to include situations in which they are unable to use cash, which may be a factor in someone’s ability to travel.

TfL and I remain committed to delivering a more inclusive transport network where everyone is able to make seamless, affordable and accessible journeys. TfL will closely monitor feedback from customers and staff to ensure the impact of any changes is fully understood.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you very much indeed, Mr Mayor. There are many concerns about TfL’s plans to temporarily remove cash payments from the stations you mentioned. There are 260,000 adults in London and 1.2 million in the UK without a bank account. That of course does not include those under 16 who do not have a bank account.

Are you really satisfied that full consideration has been given to the needs of adults on low incomes, children, people with restricted mobility and those for whom access to banking is restricted?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Not yet. As usual, Mayor’s Question Time and this question from you gives me a chance to look at issues that I do not look at probably in as much detail. I am not satisfied yet.

21 Page 265

That is why in preparation for your question, Assembly Member Pidgeon, I have done some work and I have made sure that we are kicking the tyres more to make sure that I have the reassurance that you are rightfully making sure that I have.

Can I communicate with you and others about what further work we are doing to get the reassurance we need? You are spot on. This is an issue that affects a small minority of Londoners but, to them, it is really important.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you for that. I appreciate that. The changes do seem to rely very heavily on the availability of Oyster Ticket Stops but, as TravelWatch has highlighted, they are not always near stations, fully accessible or even open the same hours as the Tube. For example, there are 17 Underground stations where the nearest Oyster Ticket Stop, if it is open, is more than 400 metres away. Will you, as part of this, give careful consideration to, if you do go ahead with removing cash, not removing it at those particular stations because of that distance? Also, will you agree to a formal and well-publicised consultation if the decision is then made to make it permanent?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We are in danger of all your points being good points. Yes, I am particularly concerned also. Let us say you have to travel at 6.30am but the nearest Oyster shop does not open until 9.00am. That is a problem. You are highlighting some of the things we have to address because it is these issues that can lead to huge inconvenience for that individual or their family. We have to make sure that we look into the various issues that TravelWatch has raised - that is one of the jobs it has - and that you have raised as well.

What I will ask my team to do is, in addition to meeting TravelWatch, your experience is quite useful and I will ask them to meet with you as well because you may have spotted things that you can ensure that we address in relation to our response as well.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Will you agree to fully consult if there is a decision in the future to make this permanent?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. Part of the equality impact assessment is making sure that we are looking into these issues and there is a proper consultation taking place. The good news is - and I hate using the phrase ‘opportunity’ or ‘silver lining’ caused by the pandemic - that it has meant that Londoners have found alternative ways, those who have plastic credit cards or debit cards, to use public transport. We are hopeful that that has led to some progress, but we will make sure there is a proper engagement exercise. We will make sure there is a proper equality assessment.

Also, this is not a done deal for the reasons you have said. There could be reasons why there are exceptions made for some stations. I should say that for some stations that adjoin the busiest Overground stations - there are 12 of them - part of our deal with the Government is for them to continue to have certain facilities available. I will make sure we will look additionally at the points you have raised.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: My one final issue: during the pandemic, the Rail Delivery Group has been offering free rail travel to people fleeing domestic abuse. Will you ensure TfL plays its role and looks to provide free travel for the first part of someone’s journey when they are also fleeing domestic abuse?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am more than happy to look into that. I will ask my Victims Commissioner and also Heidi Alexander [Deputy Mayor for Transport] to look into this with you. 22 Page 266

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you very much indeed for your answers.

2020/4532 - No improvements since PHE report Dr Onkar Sahota AM

Since PHE published their report and recommendations in June 2020, highlighting the impact of COVID-19 on the BAME community, we have heard nothing further from ministers regarding implementing its recommendations. Today, as we sit amid a second wave of infections in London, we know that almost a third of those admitted to intensive care are not white - showing no change since the first peak. What immediate steps should be taken to address this?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. Actually, my first line says we are in tier 2, which shows when the answer was written. Let me just correct that.

At the moment we are in tier 3 but the numbers of positive test cases are increasing and Londoners are working tirelessly to prevent a repeat of the terrible experience we had in the first wave. I have asked the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care for more testing and help with self-isolation for the northeast London boroughs where rates last week were increasing. This additional help has been forthcoming, I am pleased to say. I am also asking for more help across all of our city.

The idea that you can have different tiers in different parts of our city is nonsense. Anybody who suggests that does not understand our city or the virus.

Our NHS works tirelessly to care for Londoners with COVID-19 while also looking after those with other health needs. Demand for NHS services has risen in recent days, I am afraid to say. Londoners must continue to follow the rules to avoid a devastating further surge in cases at a time of year when our NHS is under increased pressure.

Following the PHE report on disproportionality, I have published my rapid review with further London-specific data and have taken action to implement the recommendations through the work of the London Recovery Board. I have also taken action to listen and engage with London’s BAME communities to make sure their views are influencing the work the Deputy Mayors and I do. The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Asian people, as seen in the first wave, is now showing in the data for positive cases. People from BAME communities are facing the most difficulties with self-isolating because they are more likely to be living in overcrowded homes where social distancing is more difficult and to be working in jobs that cannot be done from home.

The Government must step up and provide the support needed now, as well as doing much more to address the wider inequalities and structural racism that are the underlying causes of the disproportionate impacts of the virus.

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, for that response. Of course, it is now almost six months since the report was published and eight months since the inequalities effect on the BAME community became apparent in the COVID-19 pandemic. Of course, even if you look at the second wave, one third of the people in intensive care units are from BAME communities, just like in the first wave. Nothing has really changed.

23 Page 267

My real concern is of course that this a report that has been sitting on the Government’s shelf and catching dust there. There is a lack of progress. Are you concerned about how the Government has not acted upon the recommendations made in that report?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is inexcusable. You can almost see the Government making a defence for the first wave because it can say it did not know. There is no such defence in relation to what we are seeing now. As I said in answer to another question, as you know from personal experience, the bad news is that it is déjà vu. That is unacceptable. That is why it is really important that the Government wakes up to this and takes urgent action to address this.

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. I know about all the good work you are doing. The other thing is that the BAME communities are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection and complications and yet they are the very people who have the greater hesitancy in taking a vaccine.

What can we do in London to make sure that we get the messaging right and make sure that these communities are targeted? Everybody else should be taking up the vaccine, particularly the BAME community.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You will be aware of the difference vaccines have made to survival across the globe from polio to smallpox. Certain illnesses have been almost eradicated if not eradicated.

You are right to remind me and to remind us that within our communities there is a certain amount of hesitancy, particularly amongst black Londoners and separately amongst BAME Londoners and others as well. We are not talking about COVID deniers or antivaxxers. We are talking about people who have legitimate concerns that we need to address. You have a role to play as somebody who is respected in the community and who is medically qualified to persuade people about the benefits of this vaccine. We have to do our bit to encourage Londoners who are eligible for the vaccine to take it.

The vaccine will save lives. Let us have no doubt about that. The success of the vaccine is more than 95%. That is a real gamechanger. There is light at the end of the tunnel but we have to make sure that all Londoners understand the benefits of the vaccine. We encourage Londoners who are eligible for the vaccine to take it.

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Great. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Thank you very much.

2020/4483 - In-work poverty Florence Eshalomi AM MP

Why are in-work Londoners visiting Foodbanks in ever greater numbers?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. It is clear that the number of Londoners struggling to afford food has risen as a direct result of COVID-19, job losses, insecure employment and a significant reduction in working hours for many. Trussell Trust figures show that 50% of people accessing emergency food parcels through its network over the summer had never visited a foodbank before. London has seen the largest regional increase in foodbank usage as well as the highest increase in those claiming unemployment benefits.

24 Page 268

We know that this problem has not been created by the pandemic and that being in work is not a guaranteed defence against food insecurity. In 2019 I commissioned the first-ever regional measure of food insecurity in the UK. It revealed that 1.5 million adults were experiencing food insecurity in London, whilst 60% of those were in full-time or part-time employment. The fact is that people were being driven to rely on foodbanks and other forms of crisis support long before COVID.

Whilst we champion those organisations that are supporting Londoners during this pandemic, we must not lose sight of the need to tackle the underlying drivers of food insecurity: unemployment, underemployment, unfair pay and insecure or unpredictable work.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Eshalomi? I cannot see Assembly Member Eshalomi. Is your microphone muted?

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Chair, there was a message in the WhatsApp group that the Assembly Member may be held up somewhere. There was a message to change questions around.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): If she wants to come back in later on, provided there is group time left, I am very happy to call her. The next question, 2020/4778, has been withdrawn.

2020/4484 - Delay to the London Plan Nicky Gavron AM

It’s now almost a year to the day that you submitted your London Plan to the Secretary of State for approval and yet they have still not signed it off. What is the impact of this delay on London and on Londoners?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. I share your concern about the delay to the publication of the London Plan and the impact this is having on London. That is why I wrote to the Secretary of State [for Housing, Communities and Local Government] on 9 December [2020] advising him that I intend to approve a new London Plan on 21 December and submit that to him.

I received the Planning Inspectorate’s report and recommendations last October [2019] and last December I submitted my intent to publish to the Secretary of State. I responded in a timely and constructive way to his initial directions. Now, over a year after I submitted my Plan, he has responded to my letter with further directions. We are working as closely as possible to understand the impact of these directions, including further extensive discussions with Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) officials.

The Plan I intend to approve on 21 December [2020] must be agreed by the Secretary of State before it can be published. I hope he will do so with the sense of urgency he referred to in his response to me this week. It is unfortunate that the Secretary of State has held up the progress of the Plan for so long.

I know the industry, boroughs and community groups want the Plan published without delay. Currently, every planning application must be considered against two London Plans and the Secretary of State’s directions. This creates significant and unnecessary complication, uncertainty and pressure on scarce planning department capacity. At least 25 London planning authorities are currently progressing local plans and similar documents merely to deliver good-quality affordable housing, plan and deliver infrastructure and support our economy. This task is being made much more difficult by the ongoing delay to the London Plan. 25 Page 269

Nicky Gavron AM: Last week when he wrote to you, the Secretary of State [The Rt Hon] Robert Jenrick [MP] said that moving towards adoption, he recognised that it would help to drive, he said, housing delivery, economic recovery and sustainable development across London. He also said that he shared your sense of urgency. This is the same Minister who has sat on the London Plan for a year, piled delay upon delay, during the same year has brought out a huge number of disruptive new changes to the planning system, in a year of unparalleled uncertainty.

As we say, on top of this, boroughs and developers and communities are having to work between two London Plans and that is on top of everything else and the uncertainty about the planning reforms. How has that impacted on the confidence, do you think, of developers and boroughs to get building?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is a real challenge. You speak to developers like I do and also to planners. It is the uncertainty. What developers want is certainty and they are lacking that. They have to look at two London Plans. They have to be cognisant of his directions and also worried about calling in things if he is unhappy with them as well. It is the opposite of devolution. This is a really good example of the Government overcentralising things, “Whitehall knows best”, but also levelling down as far as London is concerned. If the country is to prosper they need London to continue to punch well above our weight, and I think the last 12 months have shown a really poor response from the Government. I am hoping that there will be a renewed sense of urgency to make up lost ground because what we need to have is clarity, certainty, and the pro-good growth agenda that our London Plan would deliver.

Nicky Gavron AM: Right. On that note, then, I just want to ask you something else. Yesterday there was a ministerial announcement saying that the Homes England agency was going to play a role in London now in accelerating housing delivery. Homes England was devolved to London, the whole role. Is that not going to undermine your Housing and Land division? Is that not going to, in a sense, roll back devolution? Is that not levelling down?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is another opportunity for us to give colleagues on the Assembly a history lesson. London was part of the previous Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) and you will be aware that about eight years ago we were devolved issues around housing in London. The Mayor was devolved those powers.

It appears from the announcement yesterday - we are not clear what he meant by this - that he is now asking Homes England to take over some of the role that we have. We are trying to investigate exactly what he meant by that, whether he misspoke or what he meant, because London has far exceeded other parts of the country when it comes to housing starts and houses being completed, but also the genuinely affordable housing that Londoners need. You would have thought that a Government would be trying to emulate our success story rather than taking powers away from us. I hope they are not playing party politics and levelling down, but I am more than happy to share our expertise with colleagues across the country if they need assistance in relation to more genuinely affordable homes, more council homes, and how to be pro-good growth. Last year, you will be aware, we began more homes than in the history of these powers being devolved. You would have thought they would want to copy us rather than stifle us.

Nicky Gavron AM: Right. Thank you for that answer. I am out of time, Mr Mayor, but thank you.

26 Page 270

2020/4483 - In-work poverty (supplementary) Florence Eshalomi AM MP

Navin Shah AM (Chair): OK. Assembly Member Eshalomi was encountering some IT problems, which I believe are sorted. Assembly Member Eshalomi, your follow-up question, please?

Florence Eshalomi AM MP: Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Mr Mayor, for that answer, and again it just highlights the fact that we do need to look at how we help families.

Mr Mayor, you will remember last year we went to the Peckham Pantry in Southwark to see the good work of different organisations who were effectively supporting people who were in work but having to rely on food banks. Now, just yesterday the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) announced that for the first time they are going to be feeding children in the UK, including £25,000 going to children in Southwark across 18 schools. This should shame us as a country. Why is it that we are now seeing UNICEF stepping in where the Government has failed, and how important is it for us to keep pushing and campaigning for a real living wage and reducing in-work poverty?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for your question. I have a number of responses to your question.

Firstly, you remind me, by reminding us of the visit to Peckham Pantry, of the huge contribution our faith communities and churches make to our communities. I want to, at this time of year in particular, pay tribute to our Christian communities for the amazing work they do to help the most vulnerable in our society. You are right in relation to reminding us that churches across the country will do an amazing amount this winter. They are the safety net when they should not be. It should be the role of the Government.

The second point that I want to make is that we are the sixth-richest country in the world. Just think about that. The sixth-richest country in the world, and yet UNICEF is having to provide us with assistance because of the poverty there is in our city and our country.

That leads to my third point, which is the inequalities that exist in our society. We have a situation where the difference between the richest and the poorest is huge. What annoys me, when people talk about levelling up, is not realising that in London there is a huge amount of poverty. We see it in Southwark, in Tower Hamlets, in Newham, in Hackney and other parts of our city. It is not true that our streets are paved with gold.

The London Living Wage - the real living wage, not the con - is a really good way to give people financial assistance and a decent day’s pay for a hard day’s work. The Government rebranding the national minimum wage by calling it a London living wage does not make it the London living wage. What needs to happen is more and more employers being living wage employers, and the good news is that since I have become Mayor we have more than doubled the number of employers who are living wage employers. There are more and more poorer Londoners receiving a decent pay for a hard day’s work.

In your question you recognise the fact that there are people who are underemployed, there are people who are not getting the right remuneration and who do not have security. We have to make sure we have more and more people, who are doing the right thing and working, getting a decent day’s pay for a decent day’s work.

Florence Eshalomi AM MP: No, definitely. On that, on a decent pay and decent work, one of the things the Chancellor of the Exchequer has highlighted is that work is the best route out of poverty, but we know that is 27 Page 271 not working. We are seeing more people facing unemployment and the fact is that this economic crisis is only going to get worse if we do not have a deal. What more do you think that the Chancellor, working with you on a regional level and councils, should be doing to stop people like my constituents in [the London Boroughs of] Lambeth and Southwark turning to food banks?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): What I find astonishing is the number of people across the country, including London, who have fallen through the cracks and gotten no help from this Chancellor. The excluded 3 million have no help at all. Think of those who receive their remuneration through dividends, those who are newly self-employed, those who are sole traders and those who earn above £50,000 in relation to their profit and loss account, which is not a lot in London. They have got no help at all from this Chancellor.

Also, we know that if there is not a deal with the EU, a good deal, our economy will shrink more and there will be less wealth and less prosperity, fewer jobs being created and less investment. That is why it is so crucial that the Chancellor articulates and argues the case for a decent deal with the EU. I am surprised that he, the Business Secretary and others who should know better have been so quiet. We are 14 days away from a no- deal Brexit which would be catastrophic to our economy, and I am particularly worried at this time of year. Hospitality, culture, leisure and retail have had a rotten year and because we are now in tier 3 and there is not the adequate financial support, these businesses may never reopen, those people who are currently furloughed may become unemployed, and we could see a return to mass unemployment in our city. Heart-breaking.

Florence Eshalomi AM MP: Yes. Thank you for that, Mr Mayor. I am out of time now, Chair. Thank you.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you.

2020/4322 - Policing and Politics Peter Whittle AM

Do you think it is ever appropriate for senior officers of the Metropolitan Police to engage in matters of political controversy?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. MPS officers carry out their duties without fear or favour, and understand that their role is to protect the public. The Commissioner is very clear that she is a police officer, not a politician, as are the rest of her senior team. In these trying times, they are doing a difficult job exceptionally well. The MPS is responding to changing rules and regulations and adapting its approach, often with very little warning, to ensure that Londoners are kept safe.

Despite the changing regulations, the MPS has adopted a consistent approach throughout the pandemic to protect Londoners and help stop the spread of the virus. Officers have done this by engaging with people who might be in breach of the rules, explaining the rules to them, encouraging people to follow them and only using enforcement as a last resort. The police have also had to manage a large number of public order events, even as the rules around gatherings change repeatedly. These include over 500 protests and marches between January and November this year and numerous unlicensed music events. Despite these challenges, officers have been able to bear down on violent crime, including county lines, by targeting the most violent offenders through the Violence Suppression Unit and other work that they have been doing.

These are times where questions of operational policing will overlap with wider political debates. Senior officers are frequently asked about their views on the operational impact of complex issues, with lockdown 28 Page 272 restrictions and Brexit being two recent examples of this. In these situations, experienced officers understand the challenges and constraints of an operational environment and this can help to inform debate. Although officers will sometimes comment on the operational impact of current events, both I and the MPS senior command team are clear that it is my role to provide political leadership and theirs to deliver frontline policing services.

Peter Whittle AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor, for that answer. The point, really, here is that in my question I asked about controversial issues. To take the example of Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu [QPM], most recently he made remarks that what he called “disinformation” about COVID should maybe not be allowed to be disseminated. He has also, in the past, said that, for example, there is structural racism permeating every part of British society, and also most recently he said that obviously Britain should not leave the EU without a deal because this would be deleterious to security.

All of these things, Mr Mayor, you might well agree with. As you just said, you are a politician. It is expected of you. But these things, to me, entirely undermine the idea that the police are completely impartial in the way the Commissioner last week made clear to me in the [London Assembly] Plenary, when you were present. These are political statements. Whether you agree with them or not is neither here nor there. This is a very senior policeman, Mr Mayor, making extremely partisan --

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Your question, please.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, I can understand the concern that the Assembly Member has in relation to a feeling that the police officers have views that are different to his. I suspect that what he [Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu QPM] was seeking to do - I have not seen the details - was respond to questions he was asked in relation to certain matters. I, for example, am aware of the concern he and I both have, him as a police officer and me as a politician, about false claims being used to radicalise people, and that may be what he was referring to. Similarly, his experience as an ethnic minority officer may be relevant in relation to --

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Mr Mayor, they are out of time now. Thank you very much. We will move on to the next question.

2020/4618 - Temporary Road Changes - Consultation Keith Prince AM

Now that an end is in sight from Covid-19 restrictions, how soon will TfL be either cancelling or consulting on the various temporary changes to London’s roads that have been introduced since March 2020?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. Last week saw an amazing milestone in our fight against the pandemic with the start of the largest immunisation programme the NHS has ever run. While there is light at the end of the tunnel, my message is clear: we still have a long winter ahead of us and we must all continue to play our part to keep ourselves and others safe. Relaxing too early would be dangerous. The Prime Minister has said that the tier system will be in place until at least spring next year [2021] and we expect social distancing rules to be here for some time.

29 Page 273

The Streetspace programme helps people to comply with these rules, as well as supporting a green and healthy recovery. By helping to clean up London’s air and providing better cycle routes and safer places to walk, TfL and the boroughs are doing their bit to help London build back better.

The programme is working. Cycling is the only mode of transport for which more journeys are being made than this time last year. At Colliers Wood, where protection has been added to the existing cycle lane, the number of cyclists has increased by 35% during the week and 150% at the weekend. On Park Lane, hundreds of cyclists an hour are using the new lanes. On Kensington High Street, before the Council removed the new cycle lanes, the number of people riding bikes had doubled. In the new year, Londoners will start to see the second tranche of the Government’s Active Travel Fund to come to light, meaning more Londoners will be able to walk and cycle in safe, low-traffic, cleaner streets.

I know not all feedback has been positive, but the temporary traffic orders used to put these schemes in place allow councils and TfL to flex and adapt schemes as they bed in to ensure they support their communities. That has been done for some schemes already. TfL is constantly monitoring and gathering feedback to help make decisions about the next steps for Streetspace schemes. Consultation will be required to make any of the temporary schemes permanent.

My Transport Strategy sets out an aim for 80% of all journeys to be made on foot, by cycle or using public transport by 2041. Streetspace has accelerated the pace at which we are moving towards that target. I am not willing to start unpicking this process.

Keith Prince AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. I am not challenging the fact that some of these schemes have been beneficial. In fact, some of them I would openly support. Again, I am not criticising, Mr Mayor, I am just trying to get a commitment from you that there will be proper consultation around these. Now, you know - and we can argue over what the reasons are - some of these schemes were put in very quickly, some for the right reasons, some because of Government pressure. At the end of the day, what I am asking, Mr Mayor, is for you to give a commitment.

We acknowledge these are temporary schemes. There will be a time, as you quite rightly say, I think, in spring, where we will be looking to relax some of the conditions and so on. Would that not be the right time, Mr Mayor, to conduct a proper consultation on whether or not to make these schemes permanent? Some of them probably do deserve to remain permanent, but there are others which we could argue over and others which the residents really object to. I am just asking you, Mr Mayor, to give a commitment that there will be proper consultation, at a given point, on all these schemes.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, as is often the case, Assembly Member Prince and I are not very far apart. I think you are spot on. Some of these schemes have worked; some of them have not worked as well as we would like them to have done. We have to be honest about that. Some boroughs have been really good at adapting and adjusting where they have not worked, and some boroughs have taken the decision - we may disagree with it - to do a U-turn.

You are right. Before these schemes become permanent, it is right and proper there is proper consultation. The good news is that we will have had a period of time to see the benefits and disbenefits. I think it is perfectly proper for a borough to say, “Look, we have sucked it and seen. This is what it has been like for the last X months. We are now not going to do it, we are going to do it and tweak it, or carry it on, but let us consult local residents”. That is important and healthy.

30 Page 274

I am not sure when it is going to be. Hopefully it will be spring [2021]. I think that is being quite optimistic. Why do I say that? The numbers I saw last night were that 140,000 people have received the vaccine so far. We have to roll it out across as much of the population as we can. That will take some time. Until we are sure we have controlled the virus and social distancing is not required I am not sure we can talk about the changes you would like to see, but I think we are not far apart.

Keith Prince AM: It is not changes I would like to see, it is what the residents and what the businesses want. As you say, I think spring is probably the time, but we are looking at a six-week consultation here. It would not hurt if you could give a commitment to say, “Yes, we will look at consulting around about springtime”. That will give us another six weeks. If at the end of the consultation you still think there is an argument for keeping these temporary schemes then that is for you to decide as Mayor, if indeed you are the Mayor at that point.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have to very careful about making false predictions. This Prime Minister promised that this virus would be over by Christmas, did he not? Remember that? You are asking me to --

Keith Prince AM: Let us not get into what promises people make and do not keep. You are on sticky ground --

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Did he or did he not --

Keith Prince AM: Come on, we are working together on this. Come on.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Did he or did he not say that? Did he say that?

Keith Prince AM: Did you promise 2 million trees, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Did he say that? Did he say that?

Keith Prince AM: Did you promise 2 million trees?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let us agree, then, that he said that and it did not happen. For those reasons, I think it is very unwise to predict, as you are seeking to do, that the virus will be over by spring. I disagree with you. It will not be over by spring.

Keith Prince AM: I did not say it would over by spring, Mr Mayor, I did not say that.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think the virus will still be with us.

Keith Prince AM: I agreed with you when you said spring is when it is likely to be reducing. I am agreeing with you. You said spring. I am agreeing with you about spring.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): In my previous answer I explained I think spring is too early because I think the virus will still be with us. I think we will be lucky to have the vaccine completely rolled out by spring, but before any of these schemes become permanent there needs to be a consultation and we will work with boroughs to ensure there is a consultation.

31 Page 275

Keith Prince AM: OK, Mr Mayor, I am going to leave it there. Thank you very much indeed. Merry Christmas, by the way.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You too.

Keith Prince AM: I love your Christmas decorations. Thank you.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, that is appreciated.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Right. Assembly Member Dr Moore, you have a supplementary, please?

Dr Alison Moore AM: Thank you very much, Chair. I just wanted to pick up this issue because it is one of the things that we have had a lot of to-ing and fro-ing about, and a lot of finger-pointing from Members about low-traffic neighbourhoods and other schemes. I just wanted to be clear, didn’t the Transport Secretary, [The Rt Hon] Grant Shapps [MP], encourage local councils to push ahead with these schemes and grant additional funding this November? Should the Member opposite actually be lobbying his own Transport Secretary about timing, instead of being disingenuous and trying to put it all on your plate?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have had a number of councils across London as well as Assembly Member Prince pointing fingers in the wrong direction. I think the Government was right, by the way, to try to get money out as quickly as possible. One of the consequences of that is that some of the schemes had not been properly thought through or there has been a need to adapt and adjust, and that is perfectly understandable. The Government was keen to make sure there was social distancing and avoid a car- led recovery, and I support them on that.

Where it becomes disingenuous - you are spot on - is when rather than accepting that and being grown-up about it, you have councils like Wandsworth basically lying about who is responsible. It is important that we have a bit of honesty in relation to this. Normally - and Assembly Member Prince deserves a lot of credit for this - he works cross-party and if we were outside of this meeting and having a chat, he would accept that.

Dr Alison Moore AM: Thank you very much.

2020/4514 - The Affordable Homes Programme Murad Qureshi AM

Is the £4 billion of Government funding for the 2021-26 Affordable Homes Programme enough to meet London’s housing need?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. No, London’s £4 billion settlement from Government over five years fall far short of need. Research by the GLA and G15 published last year showed London needs £4.9 billion each year for the next ten years to adequately tackle its housing crisis. Earlier this year, the final report of the COVID-19 Housing Delivery Taskforce highlighted that affordable housing funding can ensure new homes continue to be built regardless of the peaks and troughs of the private housing market, protecting jobs in the construction industry at a time when uncertainty about the labour market will impact many people.

Although I believe the size of the settlement represents a missed opportunity, I am very pleased that last month we published the Funding Guidance for the London Affordable Homes Programme 2021 to 2026, and

32 Page 276

Deputy Mayor [for Housing and Residential Development] Tom Copley deserves huge credit for getting it out so quickly. Following several months of negotiation, we achieved a settlement that prioritises homes let out at social rent levels, reflecting the overwhelming need in London for the lowest-cost rental tenues. I am also proud of the progress we have made over the last four years, hitting every single delivery target in the Affordable Homes Programme for 2016 to 2023. However, the housing crisis affects too many Londoners and I will continue to work with City Hall’s delivery partners so that more people can benefit from the opportunities that come from living in a good quality, safe and affordable home.

Murad Qureshi AM: Thank you, Mayor. I expected you to say no but in light of what the Prime Minister said in June [2020], announcing the Government will build back better, faster, and highlighting the Affordable Homes Programme as part of it, are you disappointed that last month’s Spending Review did not give more money to London for affordable homes?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Really disappointed but also really surprised because there is a potential to act in a counter-cyclical manner here. The Government has said this could be the deepest recession for 300 years. I think the Bank of England said that. You have seen a shrinkage in our economy from this time versus last year. Housebuilding is a way to get our economy going. Construction jobs, they will spend. When people move into a home, they will spend. It is a false economy and I hope the Government sees sense going forward.

Murad Qureshi AM: Yes, I agree there. Can I just add that public finances have never been cheaper, with negative interest rates? It is not so much the level of debt, it is the servicing of it, and it cannot get any cheaper than this for probably the next decade or so at least.

We also know that half the homes you want to deliver will be for social rent. Can you explain what led you to make that decision?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): What is clear from speaking to and listening to Londoners is the need for genuinely affordable homes that they can afford. I am against building luxury penthouse flats that are bought by foreigners - nothing against foreigners, some of my best friends and family are foreigners - or are left empty. It is really important that we build genuinely affordable homes, and that basically means council homes or homes at social rent. You will be aware that last year we began more council homes than any year since 1983. We are proud of that. We have to carry that progress.

Murad Qureshi AM: I am glad to hear that. Also, in your negotiations to spend the money, was there anything you wanted to do that they refused to agree to or was there anything they imposed on you as part of the funding that you would like to see removed?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): If you speak to Deputy Mayor Tom Copley, he will show you the scars in relation to the negotiations. Yes, we were a bit concerned about the Government wanting to have final say over some of our long-term strategic partnership funding. We are also concerned that they refused to help in relation to regeneration by the replacement of homes on some estates, which is really important, and by their enthusiasm for shared ownership when you and I both know the real need is for social rent homes.

But, look, in a negotiation you do not get everything. We are just pleased we got over the line, and we now want to get on and start building these homes. We are pleased we have got the prospectus out and we are in discussions now with some really good partners about getting some started, then built, so that families can move into them.

33 Page 277

Murad Qureshi AM: Yes, I am glad to hear that. As you mentioned shared ownership, I am concerned by some of the issues raised by a Panorama programme recently about how the housing associations are delivering that, on the length of the lease and the cost of the surcharges. I do hope you take that into consideration when you are making allocations. It is a critical issue for a lot of shared owners and future ones, and I think we need to get on top of it.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Spot on. One Member of the Assembly is going on about how important shared ownership is, not recognising the downsides, as you referred to, which have not been resolved. We need to resolve those before we encourage more people to enter these. As you have said, the consequences can be quite severe and it is important people are aware of those.

Murad Qureshi AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Boff has a supplementary.

Andrew Boff AM: Do you think the increased role for Homes England in your housing programme will help improve your disappointing record in building the homes Londoners need?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We began last year more council homes than in any year since 1983. Londoners need those, Londoners welcome those, and I think the rest of the country can benefit from our expertise there. We are also one of the few places across the country that has met every single target set by Government in relation to our housing programme. We have begun building more genuinely affordable homes every year since I became Mayor, breaking records: the first year, 12,500, the second year, 14,000, and the third year, more than 17,000. I think this partnership with others outside London is good if we can teach them ways to make progress, but we are not quite sure what the details of that partnership are going to be yet.

Andrew Boff AM: Many local authorities will not really want to learn what you are going to teach them, bearing in mind your record to date. You often quote council homes. How many affordable homes have been started from the 116,000 you undertook to build?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): They are all genuinely affordable. What we have done with the councils --

Andrew Boff AM: What is the number, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): They all are.

Andrew Boff AM: What is the number, Mr Mayor? What number of homes have you actually started?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): All the homes that have been started have been genuinely affordable.

Andrew Boff AM: What is the number, Mr Mayor? What is the number of homes?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): One of the things that we did was, firstly, redefine what an affordable home is --

Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, in your briefing note do you have the number of affordable homes that have been started, or do you just not know?

34 Page 278

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): -- because previously the definition of “affordable home” was one that had a cost of 80% of market rent, those homes above £450,000 --

Andrew Boff AM: These are lovely words, Mr Mayor. I want a number. What is the number of affordable homes, of the 116,000, that you have actually started? Is it embarrassing for you to reveal that number?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, it is not. We will do some basic maths. If you add up the numbers over the last few years, we have broken records and it is north of 58,000. What we are doing is making sure that we meet every target set by the Government. The difference is that our homes are genuinely affordable. You mentioned local authorities --

Andrew Boff AM: You are saying that you have started 58,000 homes?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): -- and it is really important to address your point about local authorities. We are now working with more local authorities, building council homes, than at any time of the mayoralty, and many councils and local authorities have entered deals with us to start building these council homes.

Andrew Boff AM: This is great, Mr Mayor, but why have you been so slow? Why have you been so slow? 116,000 homes were supposed to be started. You have started, in what you have just said, 58,000. The figures from your office say it is 53,000. Why have you been so slow in spending the record amount of money that Government has given you to build the homes that Londoners need?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The deal we have with Government is to have incremental increases up to 2023. Every target set by Government, we have met. If it is the case that you are suggesting that our start has been too slow, you fail to understand the housing market in London that we inherited from the previous Mayor, the legacy he left us. The Government recognise that. It is disappointing you do not. The Government recognised -- Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, in that 58,000, over 7,000 homes were started by your predecessor.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You cannot talk over me because you are not happy with the answer. Chair, that cannot be right. Because the Member is unhappy with the answer, he talks over me. How is that right?

Andrew Boff AM: I was just trying to get an answer, Mr Mayor --

Navin Shah AM (Chair): OK, let the Mayor answer the question now, please.

Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, simply speaking, you have performed really badly in delivering those 116,000 homes.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is an assertion, not a question.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Hold on.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is an assertion. Where is the question?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Let us come up with a question. Assembly Member Boff, can we have a question, please? 35 Page 279

Andrew Boff AM: I have just asked a question. You have performed really badly. Of the 116,000 homes that you said that you would deliver, on your testimony today you have delivered 58,000. Is that good performance?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): OK. Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have met the targets the Government have set. The Government, unlike the Member, recognise that because our legacy was poor and because we had a more stretching definition of “affordable home”, there would be a slow start leading to big progress. Notwithstanding that we have broken every record, since I have been Mayor, of genuinely affordable homes begun. We have broken every single record. Now, the Member does not like that so he talks over me and makes assertions about --

Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, I just asked for the numbers.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): -- the families who are moving into affordable homes, and so --

Andrew Boff AM: I just asked for numbers, Mr Mayor.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Here we go again.

Andrew Boff AM: The numbers you are giving me are pathetic, really, are they not?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): You have the numbers.

Andrew Boff AM: Pathetic. Do you, for example, Mr Mayor, still use this excuse that housing in London is a marathon rather than a sprint?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Question?

Andrew Boff AM: That is a question, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): I did not see a question there. Look --

Andrew Boff AM: Does Mr Mayor still maintain it is a marathon rather than a sprint?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely.

Andrew Boff AM: Many people compete in a marathon in order to get there first.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Have you done it? Have you done a marathon?

Andrew Boff AM: I have done a half-marathon.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Half-marathon.

Andrew Boff AM: Many people compete --

36 Page 280

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I have done a full one.

Andrew Boff AM: That is very good. Many people compete in a marathon, Mr Mayor. You will know many people compete in a marathon in order to get there first, and some run dressed as a chicken. Are you Paula Radcliffe [MBE, celebrated long-distance runner] or a chicken, Mr Mayor?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Look, again, please can we maintain a level of respect for Members?

Andrew Boff AM: I just want to know, Chair. Thank you for helpfully intervening in my question --

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Ask your question then, please.

Andrew Boff AM: -- which was not at all biased, bearing in mind your previous late contribution. Do you think those Londoners need those homes now or can they wait around?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have a group of independent experts, the G15, working with the GLA, who think that we need £4.5 billion a year over the next ten years to meet the needs of our city. Your Government gives us not £4.5 billion a year but £4 billion over five years. That demonstrates the commitment of the Government to building the genuinely affordable homes we need. Notwithstanding the paucity of ambition from the Government or their failure to understand Londoners’ need, we are breaking every record since powers were devolved to the Mayor, building more genuinely affordable homes than at any time since the Mayor has had these powers, beginning more council homes than at any time since 1983 and rehousing more families. We could do far, far more with support from this Government.

What disappoints me is Assembly Members, when it is a really important issue like this, making cheap party political points, making cheap jokes, rather than lobbying their friends in Government. What Londoners need is for a cross-party concerted effort to address the housing crisis in our city. I am proud of the progress we have made so far. I am proud of the partnership we have with housing associations, private developers and others who are important strategically going forward, including councils. What we need, though, is a little support from Government, and the first thing they could do very quickly is sign off the London Plan which has been sitting in the Government’s in-tray for the last 12 months, demonstrating a lack of commitment from the Government or care about genuinely affordable homes for our city.

Andrew Boff AM: That is it, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you.

2020/4411 - Fraud and economic crime Unmesh Desai AM

Are you confident the Met, working with partner organisations, provides a satisfactory response to victims of fraud in London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. The response to fraud is a national issue requiring national solutions. Action Fraud, managed by the City of London Police, is the UK’s reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime and was this year the subject of an independent review by Sir Craig Mackey [QPM, former Deputy Commissioner, MPS]. His report clearly highlighted the need to improve the experience of victims of 37 Page 281 fraud. Although the MPS is not specifically included in the report’s 15 recommendations, I fully support any action that results in a better service to victims and increased opportunities to catch criminals.

All victims of fraud from London can access practical and emotional support from the MOPAC-commissioned London victim and witness service. MOPAC also provides annual funding for the Economic Crime Victim Care Unit. Between January and October this year, it contacted over 15,000 victims. MOPAC and the MPS also support the National Police Digital Security Centre, which works with small and medium-sized enterprises to prevent cybercrime, including fraud, and the MPS has established the specialist Economic Crime Command to coordinate their response.

Unmesh Desai AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. As we approach Christmas, the last thing anyone wants is to be defrauded of their hard-earned money, yet we have heard serious concerns raised about the ability of Action Fraud, which you already referred to, the unit currently operated by the City of London Police, to deal with incidents that are reported. Some of these criticisms have been very severe. Sir Craig Mackey, looking into Action Fraud, said, “Fraud investigation in the UK needs a new future”. Waheed Saleem, the West Midlands Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner, went even further. He said Action Fraud is inadequate, not fit for purpose, and needs a fundamental review as it no longer has the public’s confidence.

You have talked about what the MPS is doing, but at the same time we have seen an increase in fraud reports since the beginning of the pandemic and far greater amounts of money being lost as a result. Do you think that Action Fraud needs fundamental reform in order to improve the service provided to Londoners?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sir Craig Mackey, who we know very well, made a number of recommendations which the City of London Police are going to implement. There is an implementation plan for that. MOPAC are engaged with City of London Police to understand the progress of this work and we are also working with the National Business Crime Centre to improve communication between the police and businesses. You are right, Sir Craig raised a number of concerns and that is why it is important we work closely with the City of London Police in relation to their Implementation Plan.

Unmesh Desai AM: I hope and I am sure you will keep a watch on this issue, because fraud is the fastest- growing area of crime in the UK, it accounts for one third of all crime, and reported fraud losses are approximately £2.3 billion in the last financial year, affecting around 1 million. On that note, Mr Mayor, during the first lockdown, volunteers were safely delivering advice to elderly and vulnerable residents in an effort to help prevent fraud. Whilst the police continue to be stretched, is the imaginative use of civilians, including COVID support groups, to help spread anti-fraud messages something you will be encouraging in the future?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I just say firstly that it is absolutely despicable that elderly and vulnerable residents were targeted this way in relation to this crime? Yes, the MPS has continued to visit communities and physically deliver leaflets safely to raise awareness and give proper advice, and it is really important that we continue to do so.

Unmesh Desai AM: Going into the future, Mr Mayor, in any future Police and Crime Plan that I am sure you will be working on next year, do you think fraud should be part of a Police and Crime Plan for London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes, it is one of the things we will be looking into in relation to the next Police and Crime Plan. The nature of fraud is changing, as you will be aware, with 90% now cyber-enabled, and you have also reminded us of the increase in this area. The Chief Digital Officer, London’s first, is

38 Page 282 developing a Cybersecurity Strategy to help Londoners and businesses protect themselves, and you will be hearing more of this as and when it is ready to go.

Unmesh Desai AM: Thank you for those answers, Mr Mayor. I wish you well.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you.

2020/4433 - London’s building safety Andrew Dismore AM

What has been the impact on the built environment of the Government’s apparent inaction on Londoners’ safety and on the finances of the London Fire Brigade?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. London’s built environment is extremely complex and I continue to be concerned that the Government has failed to grasp the scale of the building safety crisis. MHCLG has approximately 62,000 premises within London it considers may be higher-risk, which fall in the scope of the new Building Safety Regulator.

Although the Fire Safety Bill has nearly completed its progress through Parliament the impact it will have on resourcing and the demand on the London Fire Brigade’s (LFB) budget is still not fully known, as the detail in the related secondary legislation is still unavailable. The LFB expects that a more stringent regime of control and monitoring will bring with it additional duties for fire and rescue services, and that the clarification of the extent of the Fire Safety Order in the residential environment will add to its audit work. Previous national assumptions on LFB’s funding were based on the risk environment prior to the Grenfell Tower fire. The Government now needs to seriously consider what resourcing the LFB needs in the new risk environment.

While we press the Government for the funding required to address these challenges, I am doing all I can to protect the budgets of our most important frontline services, asking the LFB and MPS to find the smallest percentage savings across the GLA Group, and despite building safety being primarily a matter for building regulation I am seeking to lead by example and implementing bold reforms to improve building safety in London.

Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you for that answer. Mr Mayor, would you agree that the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 has laid bare truly shocking accounts of what can only be described as deceit and criminal neglect by those building companies responsible for the cladding on Grenfell, who were utterly and arrogantly dismissive of such building regulations and controls as were in force at the time, weak though they may have been? The consequences continue to grow, with thousands of residents trapped in dangerous homes and facing bills likely to bankrupt them.

And it is not just dangerous cladding, is it? [London] Fire Commissioner Andy Roe said, “We do not know the full limit of what has happened inside the built environment over the past ten to 15 years”, and the Deputy Mayor [for Fire and Resilience] told us yesterday at the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning (FREP) Committee that, “We are learning more about the problems with the built environment on an almost daily basis”. Do you agree with those propositions and what do you think the consequences of that are?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think the concern the LFB has is that the goalposts have moved in relation to what they thought was the built environment and what the reality is. Some of the evidence we 39 Page 283 have seen at Phase 2 of the Inquiry does beggar belief, and it demonstrates the consequences of profit before people and corners being cut. You are aware, because of your experience, of the impact this has on the LFB’s work and the additional pressures on them, but you are also aware of the difference resources not being there makes. That is why we are lobbying to get more resources, and you will be aware of the importance of the legislation as it goes through Parliament.

Andrew Dismore AM: Thanks for that. It is the case, is it not, that the Conservative Government has been increasingly exposed as falling down on the job? They not only voted down the Labour amendment to the Fire Safety Bill which would have brought all of the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 1 recommendations into law, their post-Grenfell record of inaction means there remain an unknown number of buildings with dangerous cladding across London. MHCLG’s best estimate so far is 62,000 dangerous buildings.

It is the case, is it not, that the Conservative Government’s failure means that the burden on the Fire Brigade, apart from the demands of COVID-19, has grown, as they are now expected to monitor and keep safe a built environment with previously unidentified risks, including inspecting over 8,000 high-rise buildings - which they have nearly completed - and an ever-growing number of buildings with waking watches? It is now over 700, and they have to be inspected regularly. That is costing the residents £12 million per month in total on what the Ministry said at the time was an interim measure. It is still ‘interim’ three and a half years after Grenfell due to the delays in remediation.

How much funding from the Government has the Brigade received for these post-Grenfell extra demands? Is it fair that Government is forcing the Brigade to shoulder the costs of monitoring the risks that their poor building regulations have left?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right to remind all of us that the consequence of what you have said is that the job of a London firefighter has never been harder and more challenging. In relation to financial support, the LFB has received very little. We are talking about single-digit millions. We have asked for a certain amount of money, we have received grant funding of £2.3 million for the building risk review programme, and £3.2 million for the protection uplift programme, and so we are asking for further monies as well. It is really important that Government resources the additional responsibilities that there are in the LFB for the reasons you have alluded to.

Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): The next question, 4707, has been withdrawn, so we will move on to a question from Assembly Member Prince.

2020/4619 - Avoiding Hypocrisy Keith Prince AM

It is reported that you believe Kensington & Chelsea Council should repay the cost of the High Street Kensington Cycle Lane. Do you believe that Redbridge Council should also repay the cost of the Barkingside South and Cranbrook LTNs?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. I set out the London Streetspace plan to enable London’s boroughs to work with TfL to react to the coronavirus pandemic rapidly, as requested by the Government to ensure public safety. Our plan focused on enabling people to walk and cycle to get around, 40 Page 284 reflecting the reduction in capacity on public transport services as a result of social distancing and to avoid a car-based recovery which would cause congestion and impact the health of Londoners. Boroughs across London have responded with schemes to improve London’s streets. This includes temporary cycle ways, low- traffic neighbourhoods, School Streets projects, and social distancing for pedestrians at crowded places such as town centres.

As part of this, with support and funding from the DfT and Downing Street, TfL agreed to pay for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) to build a temporary cycle lane on Kensington High Street. The agreement was made on the basis that the scheme would be in place for a sufficient length of time for its operation to be properly assessed.

Despite observing very significant rises in cycling along the route and minimal impact on traffic, Kensington and Chelsea decided not to see the project through to completion. This includes not implementing upgrades to signals and not installing three bus stop bypasses which could have improved movement of traffic through the corridor. Kensington and Chelsea unilaterally decided to remove the scheme instead. In terms of using public money responsibly, this is clearly hard to justify.

RBKC has not yet asked to claim any of the original TfL-offered contribution and it may be that they do not. If they do, however, TfL will need to consider whether or not to make any contributions given the circumstances I have outlined. All funding of Streetspace schemes is subject to an audit process which may lead to funding being reduced, and each funding decision is taken on a case-by-case basis.

The same approach was taken with Redbridge Council’s claim for costs relating to their low-traffic neighbourhoods. Two low-traffic neighbourhoods were introduced and then removed, and in the end TfL only contributed part of the original offer. Again, we would have preferred the schemes to have been given time to bed in to assess the impacts of different choices over time.

Keith Prince AM: Thank you for that answer, Mr Mayor. If you are working in an even-handed manner then I have no criticism of you at all. From what you have said - and I will always believe what you tell me, Mr Mayor - RBKC have not drawn down on the money, and then of course there is no money to give back, is there? If what you say is correct, that you have only partially funded the Redbridge scheme, then that appears to be relatively even-handed. That is all I am asking for. Thank you very much for your answer, Mr Mayor.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you.

2020/4356 - Green New Deal and the Ten Point Plan Léonie Cooper AM

The Government’s ‘Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution’ has been criticised for not going far enough to tackle the climate emergency or to address the jobs crisis caused by Covid-191. By contrast, your Green New Deal promises to deliver on London becoming a zero-carbon, zero-pollution city by 2030 and will deliver green collar jobs growth in the recovery period. How will you achieve these challenging targets and what are milestones have been set?

1 The Guardian, ‘Boris Johnson announces 10-point green plan with 250,000 jobs’ [Date accessed 24.11.2020]

41 Page 285

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. It is good to see the Government finally taking climate action but their Ten Point Plan will not deliver on its new commitment to cut emissions by 68% by 2030.

London’s Green New Deal mission sets the goal of tackling the climate and ecological emergencies and improving air quality by doubling the value of London’s green economy by around £100 billion by 2030. This will build on the foundations laid since I became Mayor, including retrofitting over 37,000 homes and 272 public sector buildings, installing solar panels on 850 homes, supporting 48 community energy projects and 19 decentralised energy projects. This builds on my pioneering Zero Carbon Homes standard, my award-winning ULEZ, divesting GLA cash assets from fossil fuels, supporting planting over 280,000 trees and two major new woodland creation projects covering 84 hectares.

With the UK hosting the 26th United Nations (UN) Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) next year, it is time for the Government to adequately fund and empower cities so that they can do even more.

Léonie Cooper AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. I am really pleased that you are able to give me quite a long list there of all of the things that you have been doing. I wonder if you could just say a bit more about your Community Energy Fund. I know that the closing date for new applications is 11 January [2021]. This is a fantastic way to involve local communities and I think it would be worth exploring that a bit.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes, thanks for using this opportunity to raise awareness of this really exciting initiative. Community energy groups are strongly placed to contribute towards the Green New Deal, supporting local jobs but also supply chains in the green economy. It is important we support community projects that will provide opportunities for the development of new skills, training opportunities through the creation of local apprenticeship schemes and internships, particularly for young people and the unemployed.

As you said, I launched the fourth phase of London Community Energy. Previous rounds have supported the development of 48 community energy projects and this has led to 81 different buildings being helped. That has saved not just money, but 1,500 tonnes of carbon will be saved as a result of this just next year.

Léonie Cooper AM: Which is great news. I wonder if I could move on quickly to say something about London Power. It is really unfortunate that some Assembly Members have sought to undermine the progress that you have made. Obviously, we started off with London Power working with Octopus Energy, who I believe have agreed to support London Power but not even make profits for themselves. That has been grossly misrepresented by one Assembly Member. We have also discovered now that there were other Assembly Members who were pushing you toward a completely freestanding company right from the start and are now criticising you for having worked with Octopus. That seems like the height of hypocrisy to me. I just wondered if you could comment on the progress of London Power, which has been against the backdrop of the pandemic, and how things are going.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You will be aware that I was lobbied quite aggressively by some Members of the Assembly to go down the route of other cities. I explained that one of my responsibilities was to make sure our finances were looked after and that we did not risk GLA finances by going down routes that could be really risky in relation to whether they would be a success. We decided to go down the partnership route with Octopus and London Power.

Lo and behold, we have seen other parts of the country who went down the route that I was being lobbied to by Members of the Assembly, and they are now having serious financial problems. I think I was right to have due diligence, I was right to follow the professional advice I had from my officers, and was right to ignore the 42 Page 286 representations from those Members of the Assembly. You would hope they would give credit where it is due and commend us for the stance that we took. Let us wait and see if they do so.

Léonie Cooper AM: I would completely agree. Let us wait and see if they can abandon their hypocrisy on this subject. Just to be absolutely clear, London Power is not just advertising for Octopus Energy, as has also been claimed by somebody else? Octopus is offering support to London Power, in fact?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely. We have a very good relationship and we are trying to encourage more Londoners to move over to London Power. It is important that we address the issue - you have raised this for the last four years - of fuel poverty. The amount of Londoners who are affected by this is heart-breaking. We have to do much more to address this, and this is a really good, practical way of us addressing this.

Léonie Cooper AM: Absolutely. With COP26 coming through in less than a year, Mr Mayor, do you think that there is any chance that the Government is going to step up and help us do the necessary levels of insulation of our existing buildings that need to go hand in hand with moving over to greener sources of energy?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I know many Members of the Assembly will not welcome the results in the USA, but I really welcome the election of Joe Biden. President-Elect Biden has already confirmed that they will recommit to the Paris climate agreement that was walked away from by the current President. That means that our Government now needs to follow suit. We are in a situation where our Government was being very slow and I am hoping that that is the catalyst needed to get our Government to make some rapid progress.

In the absence of the Government doing stuff, the exciting news is that cities and mayors are taking action. I was a meeting last week with the Mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, on the fifth anniversary of the Paris climate change agreement. There are mayors across the world and the country who are coming together to take action in this area. Mike Bloomberg [former Mayor of New York City] is doing a really good job bringing us together. Also, we have managed to persuade the UN to try to give us a role in relation to addressing the issue of climate change, plus civic society and businesses as well.

Léonie Cooper AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. It is great to hear that you are playing a significant role on the global platform, along with mayors of other cities. Let us just hope that the Office for Environmental Protection is able to keep us where we need to be in terms of moving forward on environmental issues after Brexit occurs. Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. Thank you, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Arbour has a supplementary.

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): Yes, Mr Mayor. I think that Assembly Member Cooper was referring to me when she inferred that someone was saying that your deal with Octopus has not been terribly good. The truth of the matter is that it is not terribly good. It has taken nine months to sign up 3,000 London residents. You have invested £3 million in this, or the GLA has invested £3 million in this. This is a subsidy of £800 per person who has signed up. It has been a very poor response.

I have to say - and this is an anecdote - as someone who just renewed his power subscription, I found that the Octopus offer was not as good as I could find elsewhere. They did not, when I went onto their website, say that they were in partnership with the GLA. I reiterate what I said, that this is indeed a bad deal. You would

43 Page 287 have done better, Mr Mayor, would you not, if you had invested that £3 million in helping the people who you say the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) are helping?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, I think he means UNICEF.

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): I beg your pardon, I do mean UNICEF.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. We are helping the poorest Londoners with a number of policies in excess of £3 million, but it was always the plan, Assembly Member, once it was launched, that it would take some time to get the customers going forward. That was always the plan. What happens is that when a new brand is launched, it needs some time for it to be recognised by Londoners. You will be reassured to know we are working with partners in councils, in housing associations and others to raise awareness. This is the first real winter in relation to London Power having an impact on Londoners.

I am disappointed about your experience. I am more than happy to raise this with London Power if you would let my office know, because that is disappointing that you could find better offers.

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): Mr Mayor, rather than dealing with that, would you answer the point that all over London, on TfL bus shelters, there are advertisements for Octopus Power? Nowhere on any of those advertisements do they say that they have any link with the GLA or any link to the scheme that is being subsidised, in effect, by you and Londoners as a whole. Would you suggest to Octopus, because you are Chairman of TfL, that TfL understand that they are in partnership with Octopus and they should give you due credit, if credit is the appropriate word, for this particular scheme?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, I am in danger of agreeing again with the Member. Can I take that away? I have not been to a bus stop recently, for obvious reasons. I am using the pushbike more than I have in the past. Let me take that away, Assembly Member Arbour, and I will report back to you on the progress we make on that, because you make a very good point again.

Tony Arbour AM (Deputy Chairman): Thank you very much.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Assembly Member Boff, do you still have a point of order?

Andrew Boff AM: Yes, I do, Mr Mayor. Is it not the case that if Members of the Assembly or anyone in this meeting has accounts with Octopus, that they should declare that interest?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Yes. Does anyone?

Andrew Boff AM: Perhaps Assembly Member Cooper would like to declare her interest.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Assembly Member Cooper?

Léonie Cooper AM: No, I switched just before London Power was launched so I am just in the period of ending my other contract, but thank you very much, Assembly Member Boff. Should I need to make that declaration, I will in due course be making it.

Andrew Boff AM: So not that much confidence in Octopus then?

44 Page 288

Léonie Cooper AM: No, I switched just before the launch.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): You have raised a point of order; I have dealt with that. Let us move on to the next question.

2020/4293 - Community-led housing Siân Berry AM

How committed are you to community-led housing?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. I firmly believe that Londoners should be able to play a leading role in building their own homes and communities, and contribute to boosting the supply of affordable housing in the capital, but they need help to do this, which is why I am taking decisive action to support the community-led housing sector to grow. I recognise that community-led housing groups face a range of challenges which have constrained the supply of new community-led homes in London in the past.

The Community-Led Housing London Hub, which I launched in 2018 and continue to fund, helps groups to overcome some of these by enabling them to access the skills, expertise and early-stage funding they need to get projects off the ground. So far, the hub has supported 90 community groups and 10 London boroughs and allocated around £1.4 million in grants and specialist officer time.

Funding is clearly another clear barrier, and in 2018 I secured £38 million from the Government ring-fenced for the delivery of community-led homes in the capital. This means that groups can now access the finance they need to bring their schemes to fruition. So far, around £8.3 million of advance revenue and capital funding has been allocated to London Citizens’ Community Land Trust (CLT), Naked House and Rural Urban Synthesis Society (RUSS) to deliver 109 homes.

Another challenge for community groups is access to land, and I am helping to address this in a number of ways. My Small Sites Small Builders programme is playing a key role and so far both London Citizen’s CLT and Crystal Palace CLT have successfully bid for sites through this initiative. We have also taken a unique approach at the St Ann’s development in Haringey by setting aside 50 homes for community-led housing. This will enable members of the community to own and control some of the homes of this flagship development and make St Ann’s one of the largest community-led housing schemes in London.

These practical initiatives are underpinned by an ambitious target set out in my London Housing Strategy to work with community-led organisations to identify a pipeline of schemes that have capacity to deliver at least 1,000 homes by 2021. I am pleased to say we have exceeded that target early with a pipeline of 1,248 homes. By helping community-led groups play a leading role in developing and managing new homes, I hope we can all benefit from housing built by all Londoners.

Siân Berry AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. First of all, can I just check? You have Christmas lights in your office plants back there, do you not? That is very nice and very festive. I have some of mine up as well today. I wish more Assembly Members were doing that. It is important to be festive despite the hard times that we all face, and Merry Christmas to you.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You too.

45 Page 289

Siân Berry AM: Going back to community-led housing, which you know I feel very strongly about supporting, I thank you for that summary and it does correlate with the numbers that I have been trying to put together, trying my best to find every home that is in the programme. In terms of homes that have received funding so far, we are at 129 homes. If you add in the St Ann’s 50 that have just been announced you get to your 179, which is the number you have me. That is nowhere close to what was said in 2019 when you launched the £38 million fund to get to 500 homes by 2023. We are not at the pipeline of 1,000 homes. 129 is way off getting that ready for this coming year of 2021, and in the Olympic Park there is nothing at all and that is the original place Londoners really wanted to see these kinds of homes.

Can you tell us what will get you spending this more quickly? Why did you not ask for more funding from the Government in your request to the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR)?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You raise a number of different points. Let us deal with each of them. We have in the pipeline 1,248 homes. That is more than the 1,000 target we had by 2021. You will be aware of the issues there are in relation to bringing people together, the support they need, the expertise they need, the funding they need, and the land they need. We are helping different communities across London to do this. You are also aware that CLTs and community-led homes are not on a massive scale. They tend to be small pockets of homes across London, so it does take some time.

In relation to the CSR, it was a one-year CSR, as the Chancellor announced at the last minute, and the monies we have allocated are more than one year. They go to 2023. The money that we have, the £38 million which I mentioned --

Siân Berry AM: 65% of it remains unspent at the present time. That is what is worrying me.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Your criticism is that we should bid for more money for one year, when we have money taking us forward. One of the things we are doing through the hub, which I thought you welcomed, was to encourage people to come together and give them the support and practical help they need. If it is the case that you are aware of communities, whether it is co-housing or CLTs, who are simply waiting for assistance, we can provide the assistance, but we have exceeded our target, 1,000 versus 1,248, and we will continue to work with communities across London.

Siân Berry AM: There are some barriers and sticking points. For example, Croydon Council were nearly releasing sites for CLTs but they are more or less restricted from doing anything at the moment. We have seen problems in Tower Hamlets, for example. Some community groups seem to be on the verge of pulling out because their seed funding is running out. I hope there is more that you can do, more staffing that you can put into this to try to unblock some of these schemes as quickly as you possibly can.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you, Assembly Member Berry, you are out of time. Before we move on to continue with the meeting, can I ask the Assembly to agree to suspend Standing Order 2.9B, in accordance with the provision of Standing Order 1.1H, so that we can continue with the remaining business on the agenda?

All: Agreed.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you. Assembly Member Boff has a supplementary to the question.

46 Page 290

Andrew Boff AM: Despite Londoners’ housing crisis, you have yet to allocate £535 million of the record grant that Government has allocated you to date. Do you not think you could have supported a few more community-led projects with that money?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It shows a basic lack of understanding about the way community-led housing works. The issue is not a shortage of money from City Hall, the issue is working with communities to give them the support, the expertise and the land, as well as the funding, that they need. As I said, we have sufficient funding for the next couple of years. The issue is working with communities. Often, for good reasons, they are not housing specialists or housebuilding specialists and they need the expertise to bring them together. They tend to be smaller sites across London. We are working with a number of councils who have released small sites and the communities around them who want that, and we continue to do so.

In relation to the unallocated money from the monies we secured from Government, in relation to the record 116,000 new genuinely affordable homes, there is a small percentage unallocated because we are in negotiations with some developers, housing associations and councils. One of the slight complications is that some partners we were originally going to deal with may decide to pivot towards the new funding because there are different metrics in relation to the new funding, for good reasons. Some developers may want to have less shared ownership, more social rent, because of the way the funding works. Those are some of the discussions taking place. One of the reasons we were keen to get a prospectus out - and we did, thankfully, last month - was to start these conversations.

I am not troubled by the unallocated monies from 2016 to 2023. We are in discussions about the next tranche of money. Nor do I think the issue of community-led housing not coming forward in the numbers we would like is because of lack of funding. It is because by its very nature it is quite difficult to build big numbers using this technique.

Andrew Boff AM: I understand it is too difficult for you, Mr Mayor, but what Assembly Member Berry asked is for some investment in order to increase the capacity to take on more community-led housing projects.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I will ask one of my team to send you a note about the hub because clearly you are not aware of what the hub does. One of the things the hub does is to give this sort of support. It has the flexibility to meet the demands of community groups with a team of specialist advisors. Rather than you trying to help Assembly Member Berry, why does she not advise you on some of the stuff the hub does? I think it is you that needs her help rather than her needing your help.

Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, I think it is Londoners who need help, and they are not getting it from you.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is the best he can do. God. And he is the experienced Member of the Assembly.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): All right, we will move on to the last question on the agenda paper, and that is from Assembly Member --

Léonie Cooper AM: Chair, I have asked to come in on this, if I may, through the usual channels.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Yes. I have not had the indication. Please feel free to do so.

Léonie Cooper AM: 47 Page 291

Mr Mayor, I just wondered if we could pick up on this issue about housing. It is not just community groups in terms of power that I asked you about earlier on. You have been working with groups across London, and I wondered if you could say a bit about the St Ann’s site and the work that has been going on there.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): A really good example of us working with community groups across London. We took over a site where local residents were not happy, community groups were not happy and there was very little affordable housing, and we worked with the community, worked with the NHS, to increase hugely the amount of genuinely affordable homes, but also worked with the community to make sure some of the homes were community-led housing as well. We have now reached a really good deal with Catalyst to assist on this site. It is a good example of us delivering for Londoners.

I would remind us through your question that before I became Mayor the view of the previous Mayor, supported by Members of this Assembly, was that the way to help Londoners was for us to build luxury penthouse flats that stayed empty, or to build homes costing more than £450,000, or homes that were more than 80% market value. It is us that has changed those policies, but it is a tanker, and it is a marathon, not a sprint. It is quite clear some Members of this Assembly have not sprinted or run a marathon, but we need to make sure that we need to use the resources we have to hugely increase the capacity of housebuilding in our city. I think it is a missed opportunity for the Government not to help us, particularly with the counter-cyclical nature of the housing market. That is a real opportunity and we will kick ourselves if we do not use it.

Léonie Cooper AM: That is an interesting point about the turning around of the tanker because I think your predecessor benefited at the beginning, in 2008 through to 2012, from money that came from the Labour Government. It boosted his figures in terms of housing completions to a much higher level than he was actually interested in, because it was the luxury penthouse market rather than the community-led developments that he was always talking about.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. You will see, in relation to the first term of the previous Mayor, two things. The first was that it was the Labour Government giving the resources, but secondly, he was not responsible for the housing. It was the HCA. When housing was devolved to him and there was a different Government giving him the support, the numbers of affordable homes went down hugely. You will be aware of the large number of trips he made overseas - sometimes with people who should not have been on those trips, by the way - to try to get even more monies for these luxury penthouse flats. I have nothing against foreigners - as I explained, I have family members who are foreigners, and many friends - but we should be building homes for Londoners that they can afford to live in rather than luxury penthouse flats which are gold bricks for foreigners.

Léonie Cooper AM: Yes. Like you, I have family members who are both foreigners and also bus drivers, in fact, as well. Not getting diverted down that route in terms of family members, I just wondered if you would like to comment on how much easier it may have been to development the St Ann’s site, where you had not only community support and housing association support but also a supportive local authority. Would you comment on how you have been trying to use the planning system, with stage 1 and stage 2 and your very clear direction towards having a minimum level of affordable housing - I love the way you always talk about genuinely affordable housing - and how you have had to use that with some boroughs, who seem to be dragged kicking and screaming towards affordable housing, and how effective that has been since you have been Mayor.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. We have been lucky we have had a coalition of the willing. St Ann’s is a good example of a compare and contrast. In the St Ann’s scheme, the legacy I inherited was for 470 48 Page 292 homes, of which 40% would have been ‘affordable’ with a dodgy definition. We have managed to increase that to 934 homes, with 60% which are genuinely affordable. That includes 50 which are set aside for community-led housing. If they could do more we would give them more, but they cannot. It is all well and good some Members of the Assembly saying that there should be more but we have to recognise the capacity there is in that community, who are doing a fantastic amount of work to do the 50. We are working with partners to --

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Can someone turn their mobile off, please, and microphone as well?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is a new form of heckling I am not used to, which is Conservatives, when they are beaten in an argument, having the phone ringing. I am used to lies, not a phone ringing.

Léonie Cooper AM: It was not me, Mr Mayor, because I have my microphone on mute. I am having one of those working from home moments, my dog is actually playing in the room, so I was trying to keep that off the microphone. Thank you very much for that answer, and I really wish the Government gave a special dedicated fund for community-led housing that allowed us to do so much more. I sit as a Labour and Co-operative Member of the Assembly and I am very proud to be a Co-operative Member of the Assembly as well as a Labour Member. The more co-operative and community-led housing we can produce across London, the better. Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. Thank you, Chair.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you. We also have a question from Assembly Member Gavron on this issue.

Nicky Gavron AM: Thank you for bringing me in. I just wanted to make a point, actually. I think it is very good what is happening at St Ann’s but I wanted to make a different point. It was just coming in about what the Mayor inherited from his predecessor, [The Rt Hon] Boris Johnson [MP, former Mayor of London]. The last year, 2015/16, I think London had only 300 affordable homes delivered by Boris Johnson. Just 300. I just wanted to make that point because it means that the Mayor inherited a very poor playing field when he came in in terms of what was in the pipeline. I think that needs to be made, that point, because there has been so much talk about numbers. That is all.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Is there a question there?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): All I would say is that if the Conservatives disagree with that, let them come in now and rebut that.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): All right, we will move on to now definitely the last question.

2020/4343 - Exams 2021 Jennette Arnold OBE AM

The Government recently announced their contingency plans for the 2021 exams period. Do you think these plans are sufficient for students in London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. Students due to take exams are experiencing considerable anxiety after missing months of teaching and face uncertainty as the pandemic continues. The Government has announced a package of measures to support students taking exams next year. However, students have already had to wait a full term for these plans and will have to wait until January or early 49 Page 293

February [2021] for information on which topics will be covered. The Government must prioritise the development of a back-up plan to avoid another last-minute exams U-turn.

I am pleased the Government has responded to my calls and announced the introduction of weekly rapid COVID-19 tests to secondary schools and colleges in England from January. The Government must ensure teachers and young people who are due to take exams have priority access to COVID-19 testing and prompt results to minimise disruption for students who would otherwise have to self-isolate.

Alongside the Government’s proposals for more generous grading next year, our most disadvantaged students must be given extra support to catch up on lost learning. The effect of the pandemic on London’s children and young people will continue to be beyond exams next summer and the Government needs a long-term plan to ensure a whole generation is not left behind.

Jennette Arnold OBE AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, for your answer. I just want to focus on the package of measures and the need for catch-up that you have spoken about. Mr Mayor, some work done in my office shows that the majority of the catch-up funding has not been received in areas with the most disadvantaged pupils. There is no guarantee that those most disadvantaged will receive the right level of catch-up tuition, and even if they targeted it in the right place, the amount of money is just not enough.

Let me just share it with you quickly. Some work done in my office shows that when you compare the money received by Richmond upon Thames - one of the richest boroughs in the city, with the second-lowest number of children on free school meals in London at just over 2,000 - versus that received by Tower Hamlets, who on the other end have the highest number of children on free school meals at over 15,000, Richmond ended up with 644% more whilst Tower Hamlets only received about 68% more funding in the catch-up programme, compared to Richmond. This cannot be fair. Clearly, this fund is missing out those children most in need.

As you said, and I totally agree, if we do not do something urgently then thousands of children across the city will experience a learning loss which will be added to the disadvantages they already have to deal with, day in, day out, and that will definitely impact on their life chances. Will you look to see if you can write to Government? I know that it takes a long time to get a response back from the Department for Education, but it has to be raised with them that their catch-up fund and some of their packages and measures for supporting disadvantaged children have just not reached the spot. I do hope that you can do this.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, I would just say that the issues raised by the Member are really worrying because they will widen inequalities that exist already in our city. We are all aware of the difference education can make as a social ladder for progression. I will ask my office to liaise with Assembly Member Arnold’s office to get the data and the research she has done, and I will be making urgent representations to [The Rt Hon] Gavin Williamson [CBE MP, Secretary of State for Education] to address this anomaly. We are not against kids in Richmond getting this catch-up support, not at all. The issue is making sure that other children across our city who may not have laptops, may not have decent wi-fi connections, may have missed out on lots of classes because of bubbles being sent home and may do less well in their GCSE exams, A-Levels and other exams than they should do, are getting the help they need. I will make those representations urgently and work with Assembly Member Arnold’s office to get that data to the Government as well, so they can see the inequalities potentially getting worse.

Jennette Arnold OBE AM: Thank you so much, and thank you for pointing that out. My colleague, the Deputy Chair of the Assembly, knows of my fondness for his borough. In fact, if I were staying on I would even consider going over and challenging him for that seat. No, it is about the stark differences in our city. 50 Page 294

We have to be working towards narrowing and eradicating those differences, not for Government policy to widen them. Thank you.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Well, Mr Mayor, thank you very much for answering the questions.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, can I just say one thing before we end?

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Sure.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chair, I just wanted to thank you and all the Assembly Members. You have worked incredibly hard this year. This has probably been, in our professional lives, the hardest year of our lives, from March until now, and we know that although we may have light at the end of the tunnel with the vaccine there are still come tricky weeks and months ahead. Can I just wish you all a really happy Christmas and a safe one? Please look after your families.

I want to thank you, genuinely. We may disagree on various policies and issues, we may have knockabout stuff, but I am really grateful for the work you do holding me to account, making me hopefully be a better Mayor but also serving our city. I am really grateful and I think our city is lucky, at this time, to have the 25 of you serving our city. I hope you all have a safe Christmas and I will see you in the new year.

Navin Shah AM (Chair): Thank you, Mr Mayor. Like you said, it has been a very tough year for everyone. We have been truly tested and it has been the collective work of the Assembly, together with your leadership with our Mayor. We have tried to do our best for Londoners and that is what we shall continue to do. I do hope, Mr Mayor, that you have a little bit of respite, a little bit of time during the festive period, and I wish you and your family Merry Christmas and season’s greetings. Thank you very much.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chair. Stay safe, take care.

51 Page 295 This page is intentionally left blank

Page 296