DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2009.06972V2 [Astro-Ph.SR] 1 Oct 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2009.06972V2 [Astro-Ph.SR] 1 Oct 2020 MNRAS 000,1{19 (2020) Preprint 2 October 2020 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Asteroseismic Inference of Subgiant Evolutionary Parameters with Deep Learning Marc Hon1?, Earl P. Bellinger2;1;3, Saskia Hekker3;2, Dennis Stello1;2;4, and James S. Kuszlewicz3;2 1School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia 2Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 G¨ottingen, Germany 4Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT With the observations of an unprecedented number of oscillating subgiant stars ex- pected from NASA's TESS mission, the asteroseismic characterization of subgiant stars will be a vital task for stellar population studies and for testing our theories of stellar evolution. To determine the fundamental properties of a large sample of subgiant stars efficiently, we developed a deep learning method that estimates distributions of fundamental parameters like age and mass over a wide range of input physics by learn- ing from a grid of stellar models varied in eight physical parameters. We applied our method to four Kepler subgiant stars and compare our results with previously deter- mined estimates. Our results show good agreement with previous estimates for three of them (KIC 11026764, KIC 10920273, KIC 11395018). With the ability to explore a vast range of stellar parameters, we determine that the remaining star, KIC 10005473, is likely to have an age 1 Gyr younger than its previously determined estimate. Our method also estimates the efficiency of overshooting, undershooting, and microscopic diffusion processes, from which we determined that the parameters governing such pro- cesses are generally poorly-constrained in subgiant models. We further demonstrate our method's utility for ensemble asteroseismology by characterizing a sample of 30 Kepler subgiant stars, where we find a majority of our age, mass, and radius estimates agree within uncertainties from more computationally expensive grid-based modelling techniques. Key words: asteroseismology { stars: oscillations { stars: evolution { methods: data analysis 1 INTRODUCTION 1977). As the interiors of subgiants evolve over relatively arXiv:2009.06972v2 [astro-ph.SR] 1 Oct 2020 short timescales, the mixed mode behaviour of the star's Asteroseismology of solar-like oscillations is a powerful ap- oscillation spectrum also changes rapidly (e.g., Christensen- proach to measure ages of individual field stars. By prob- Dalsgaard et al. 1995). Hence, detailed measurements of sub- ing the stellar interior, asteroseismic measurements can re- giant mixed modes not only provide valuable diagnostics of veal structural changes that are indicators of stellar evo- the stellar interior (e.g., Deheuvels & Michel 2011; Benomar lution. This is especially the case for subgiant stars that et al. 2012; Benomar et al. 2014), but also yield precise stel- have begun to show mixed modes in their oscillation spec- lar age estimates (e.g., Deheuvels et al. 2014; Metcalfe et al. tra. These modes arise from the coupling of acoustic waves 2014; Li et al. 2017). that propagate in the stellar envelope with gravity (g-) waves that propagate near the core (Osaki 1975), and re- Owing to high-quality photometric observations from sult in perturbations to the near-uniform frequency spacing the Kepler space mission (Borucki et al. 2010), precise os- of acoustic (p-) modes (avoided crossings, Aizenman et al. cillation frequencies have been measured for subgiant stars (e.g., Appourchaux et al. 2012). Such measurements have en- abled the fundamental stellar parameters of subgiants to be ? E-mail: [email protected] determined using stellar modelling techniques (e.g., Metcalfe © 2020 The Authors 2 Hon et al. Figure 1. (a) General schematic of the deep neural network in this work. The network takes as input individual mode frequencies, xfreq, along with measurements from global seismic parameters and spectroscopic measurements, xobs, to predict the parameters describing a 10-dimensional Gaussian mixture distribution of stellar model parameters, y. These parameters are the mean (µ), deviations (σ), and mixture coefficient (π) of each Gaussian in the mixture. (b) Schematic of a mixture density network. The network maps input x, which is indicated by the neurons within the box, into conditional density p¹y j xº by predicting the shape parameters π¹xº; µ¹xº; σ¹xº for as many as k Gaussian functions, which are combined to form a mixture model as described in Equations4 and5. et al. 2010; Creevey et al. 2012; Doˇgan et al. 2013; Stokholm solutions. Grid interpolation methods mitigate the need for et al. 2019). Although only a small number of oscillating sub- a very fine grid of models; however they still struggle with giants were observed by Kepler, this number is expected to high computational complexity once additional dimensions be amplified by NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satel- are included in the search. A common alternative is to re- lite (TESS), where at least a few hundred oscillating sub- strict the search to only a few free parameters and use ap- giants are expected to be observed for a year (Campante proximations for other initial model parameters. These in- et al. 2016; Schofield et al. 2019). There will therefore be clude the adoption of a solar-calibrated value for the mixing further opportunities for studying subgiant stellar structure length parameter (αMLT), or the use of the Galactic enrich- and evolution along the subgiant branch. ment relation to estimate the initial helium abundance (Y0) Stellar models are necessary for inferring stellar ages but using the initial metal abundance (Z0). These assumptions the task of finding a model that best fits the observables may lead to underestimated uncertainties and/or systematic from a star is computationally demanding. Such a task is errors when inferring stellar properties from models. An ad- a non-linear, high-dimensional optimization problem, where ditional prohibiting factor in subgiant model searches is the the complex relations governing stellar structure and evolu- time-consuming calculation of non-radial modes for evolved tion (E) are sensitive to numerous input physical parameters stars, which makes it expensive for search methods that re- that are being optimized (P) such as the star's mass, initial quire either a large grid of models or the on-the-fly calcula- composition, and mixing parameters. Traditional optimiza- tion of stellar tracks (e.g., Metcalfe et al. 2009; Paxton et al. tion methods find a best-matching set of parameters (P∗) 2013). that best fits the observed properties of a star (O) by solv- ing the following: Bellinger et al.(2016, hereafter BA16) showed that E¹Pº − Oº2 these problems can be mitigated for main-sequence stars P∗ = arg min ; (1) by using machine learning to infer the parameters of stel- U2 P lar models from a given set of observables. Machine learning where U is the uncertainty from O. However, as the dimen- techniques, once trained, are able to statistically capture the sionality of P increases, the volume of the parameter space complex relations connecting observations to stellar models involved in the search increases exponentially. In an attempt at a fraction of the computational cost required for model to make stellar model searches tractable, traditional opti- grid searches. In other terms, machine learning algorithms mization methods typically deploy one or more of the fol- can learn to approximate the inverse relation E−1 between lowing strategies: lowering the model grid density, grid inter- model parameters and observed data. As a result, such al- polation (e.g., Rendle et al. 2019), or reducing the number gorithms output maximum likelihood estimates for P∗ by of initial model parameters that are explored in the search. computing E−1¹Oº. These algorithms have been shown by Lowering the grid density significantly reduces the number BA16 to be effective in the systematic age determination of models required to be generated, but comes at the cost of of all main-sequence stars within the high-quality Kepler parameter coverage that may result in finding sub-optimal LEGACY sample with an age precision closely comparable MNRAS 000,1{19 (2020) Subgiant properties with deep learning 3 to those inferred from traditional grid-based optimization the surface, which reduces a star's age at a given mean den- methods (Angelou et al. 2017; Bellinger et al. 2019a). sity (e.g., Miglio & Montalb´an 2005; Gai et al. 2009; Valle In this work, we seek to extend machine learning-based et al. 2015). Meanwhile, the undershooting parameter αunder stellar model inference towards subgiant stars using deep controls the inwards extent of the outer convective boundary learning. A major difference between our work and the BA16 of the stellar envelope and is often constrained to be equiv- study is the type of asteroseismic stellar age proxy used. The alent with αover. For exploratory purposes, we set αunder to observed oscillation frequency ratios r0;2, which are known be a free parameter. to be sensitive towards core hydrogen abundance (Roxburgh Despite much evidence in literature indicating the im- & Vorontsov 2003), are typically used as a stellar age proxy portance of these additional processes in stellar models (e.g., for main-sequence stars (e.g., Christensen-Dalsgaard 1984; Guzik & Cox 1993; Gruyters et al. 2013; Silva Aguirre et al. White et al. 2011; Bellinger & Christensen-Dalsgaard 2019). 2013), there remains significant uncertainty in both theory These ratios, however, are no longer effective age proxies for and observations regarding the nature and efficiency of such core hydrogen-depleted subgiant stars. Instead, observations processes. It is therefore common for modelling tasks to ei- of rapidly evolving mixed modes can be used to precisely ther disregard the parameters governing these additional constrain subgiant stellar ages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterizing Two Solar-Type Kepler Subgiants with Asteroseismology: Kic 10920273 and Kic 11395018
    The Astrophysical Journal, 763:49 (10pp), 2013 January 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/49 C 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. CHARACTERIZING TWO SOLAR-TYPE KEPLER SUBGIANTS WITH ASTEROSEISMOLOGY: KIC 10920273 AND KIC 11395018 G. Doganˇ 1,2,3, T. S. Metcalfe1,3,4, S. Deheuvels3,5,M.P.DiMauro6, P. Eggenberger7, O. L. Creevey8,9,10, M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro11, M. Pinsonneault3,12, A. Frasca13, C. Karoff2, S. Mathur1,S.G.Sousa11,I.M.Brandao˜ 11, T. L. Campante11,14, R. Handberg2, A. O. Thygesen2,15, K. Biazzo16,H.Bruntt2, E. Niemczura17, T. R. Bedding18, W. J. Chaplin3,14, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard2,3,R.A.Garc´ıa3,19, J. Molenda-Zakowicz˙ 17, D. Stello18, J. L. Van Saders3,12, H. Kjeldsen2, M. Still20, S. E. Thompson21, and J. Van Cleve21 1 High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA; [email protected] 2 Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kohn Hall, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 4 Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO 80301, USA 5 Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101, USA 6 INAF-IAPS, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Roma, Italy 7 Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, Maillettes 51, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 8 Universite´ de Nice, Laboratoire Cassiopee,´ CNRS UMR 6202, Observatoire de la Coteˆ d’Azur, BP 4229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France 9 IAC Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, C/V´ıa Lactea´ s/n, E-38200 Tenerife, Spain 10 Universidad de La Laguna, Avda.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetism, Dynamo Action and the Solar-Stellar Connection
    Living Rev. Sol. Phys. (2017) 14:4 DOI 10.1007/s41116-017-0007-8 REVIEW ARTICLE Magnetism, dynamo action and the solar-stellar connection Allan Sacha Brun1 · Matthew K. Browning2 Received: 23 August 2016 / Accepted: 28 July 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The Sun and other stars are magnetic: magnetism pervades their interiors and affects their evolution in a variety of ways. In the Sun, both the fields themselves and their influence on other phenomena can be uncovered in exquisite detail, but these observations sample only a moment in a single star’s life. By turning to observa- tions of other stars, and to theory and simulation, we may infer other aspects of the magnetism—e.g., its dependence on stellar age, mass, or rotation rate—that would be invisible from close study of the Sun alone. Here, we review observations and theory of magnetism in the Sun and other stars, with a partial focus on the “Solar-stellar connec- tion”: i.e., ways in which studies of other stars have influenced our understanding of the Sun and vice versa. We briefly review techniques by which magnetic fields can be measured (or their presence otherwise inferred) in stars, and then highlight some key observational findings uncovered by such measurements, focusing (in many cases) on those that offer particularly direct constraints on theories of how the fields are built and maintained. We turn then to a discussion of how the fields arise in different objects: first, we summarize some essential elements of convection and dynamo theory, includ- ing a very brief discussion of mean-field theory and related concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroseismology Notes
    2 observed pulsations • operate on the dynamical time scale Asteroseismology • accessible on convenient time scale • probe global and local structure Steve Kawaler • periods change on ‘evolutionary’ time scale Iowa State University (thermal or nuclear) - depend on global properties • amplitudes change on ~ ‘local’ thermal time scale 3 4 dynamical stability a more complex example: a star • “stable” configuration represents a stable mean configuration • multiple oscillation modes • on short time scale, oscillations occur, but the • radial modes - enumerated by number of mean value is fixed on longer time scales nodes between center and surface • simple example: a pendulum (single mode) • most likely position - extrema • non-radial modes - nodes also across • mean position is at zero displacement surface of constant radius with no damping would oscillate forever • • modes frequencies determined by solution of • more complex example: a vibrating string the appropriate wave equation • multiple modes with different frequencies • enumerated by number of nodes 5 6 stability, damping, and driving Okay, start your engines... • PG 1159: light curve • zero energy change: what kind of star might this be? constant amplitude oscillation • • what kind of star can this not possibly be? • energy loss via pulsation: • what about the amplitude over the run? oscillation amplitude drops with time • PG 1336 light curve • if net energy input: • huh? what time scale(s) are involved amplitude increases with time • what kind of star (or stars)? (if properly phased)
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Hunters1 (Fischer Et Al
    draft version May 31, 2012 Planet Hunters: Assessing the Kepler Inventory of Short Period Planets Megan E. Schwamb1,2,3,Chris J. Lintott4,5, Debra A. Fischer6, Matthew J. Giguere6, Stuart Lynn5,4, Arfon M. Smith5,4, John M. Brewer6, Michael Parrish5, Kevin Schawinski2,3,7, and Robert J. Simpson4 [email protected] ABSTRACT We present the results from a search of data from the first 33.5 days of the Kepler science mission (Quarter 1) for exoplanet transits by the Planet Hunters citizen science project. Planet Hunters enlists members of the general public to visually identify tran- sits in the publicly released Kepler light curves via the World Wide Web. Over 24,000 volunteers reviewed the Kepler Quarter 1 data set. We examine the abundance of ≥ 2 R⊕ planets on short period (< 15 days) orbits based on Planet Hunters detections. We present these results along with an analysis of the detection efficiency of human classifiers to identify planetary transits including a comparison to the Kepler inventory of planet candidates. Although performance drops rapidly for smaller radii, ≥ 4 R⊕ Planet Hunters ≥ 85% efficient at identifying transit signals for planets with periods less than 15 days for the Kepler sample of target stars. Our high efficiency rate for simulated transits along with recovery of the majority of Kepler ≥4R⊕ planets suggest suggests the Kepler inventory of ≥4 R⊕ short period planets is nearly complete. Subject headings: Planets and satellites: detection-Planets and satellites: general 1. Introduction In the past nearly two decades, there has been an explosion in the number of known planets arXiv:1205.6769v1 [astro-ph.EP] 30 May 2012 orbiting stars beyond our own solar system, with over 700 extrasolar planets (exoplanets) known 1Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Yale University,P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Jun 2012 Kepler-36: a Pair of Planets with Neighboring Orbits
    Kepler-36: A Pair of Planets with Neighboring Orbits and Dissimilar Densities Joshua A. Carter1+∗, Eric Agol2+∗, William J. Chaplin3, Sarbani Basu4, Timothy R. Bedding5, Lars A. Buchhave6, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard7, Katherine M. Deck8, Yvonne Elsworth3, Daniel C. Fabrycky9, Eric B. Ford10, Jonathan J. Fortney11, Steven J. Hale3, Rasmus Handberg7, Saskia Hekker12, Matthew J. Holman13, Daniel Huber14, Christopher Karoff7, Steven D. Kawaler15, Hans Kjeldsen7, Jack J. Lissauer14, Eric D. Lopez11, Mikkel N. Lund7, Mia Lundkvist7, Travis S. Metcalfe16, Andrea Miglio3, Leslie A. Rogers8, Dennis Stello5, William J. Borucki14, Steve Bryson14, Jessie L. Christiansen17, William D. Cochran18, John C. Geary13, Ronald L. Gilliland19, Michael R. Haas14, Jennifer Hall20, Andrew W. Howard21, Jon M. Jenkins17, Todd Klaus20, David G. Koch14, David W. Latham13, Phillip J. MacQueen18, Dimitar Sasselov13, Jason H. Steffen22, Joseph D. Twicken17, Joshua N. Winn8 1Hubble Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Department of Astronomy, Box 351580, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA arXiv:1206.4718v1 [astro-ph.EP] 20 Jun 2012 3School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK 4Department and Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA 5Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 6Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Natural History
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Stellar Model-Fitting Pipeline for Asteroseismic Data from the TESS Mission
    Development of a Stellar Model-Fitting Pipeline for Asteroseismic Data from the TESS Mission PI: Travis Metcalfe / Co-I: Rich Townsend Collaborators: David Guenther, Dennis Stello The launch of NASA’s Kepler space telescope in 2009 revolutionized the quality and quantity of observational data available for asteroseismic analysis. Prior to the Kepler mission, solar-like oscillations were extremely difficult to observe, and data only existed for a handful of the brightest stars in the sky. With the necessity of studying one star at a time, the traditional approach to extracting the physical properties of the star from the observations was an uncomfortably subjective process. A variety of experts could use similar tools but come up with significantly different answers. Not only did this subjectivity have the potential to undermine the credibility of the technique, it also hindered the compilation of a uniform sample that could be used to draw broader physical conclusions from the ensemble of results. During a previous award from NASA, we addressed these issues by developing an automated and objective stellar model-fitting pipeline for Kepler data, and making it available through the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal (AMP). This community modeling tool has allowed us to derive reliable asteroseismic radii, masses and ages for large samples of stars (Metcalfe et al., 2014), but the most recent observations are so precise that we are now limited by systematic uncertainties associated with our stellar models. With a huge archive of Kepler data available for model validation, and the next planet-hunting satellite already approved for an expected launch in 2017, now is the time to incorporate what we have learned into the next generation of AMP.
    [Show full text]
  • IAU Symp 269, POST MEETING REPORTS
    IAU Symp 269, POST MEETING REPORTS C.Barbieri, University of Padua, Italy Content (i) a copy of the final scientific program, listing invited review speakers and session chairs; (ii) a list of participants, including their distribution on gender (iii) a list of recipients of IAU grants, stating amount, country, and gender; (iv) receipts signed by the recipients of IAU Grants (done); (v) a report to the IAU EC summarizing the scientific highlights of the meeting (1-2 pages). (vi) a form for "Women in Astronomy" statistics. (i) Final program Conference: Galileo's Medicean Moons: their Impact on 400 years of Discovery (IAU Symposium 269) Padova, Jan 6-9, 201 Program Wednesday 6, location: Centro San Gaetano, via Altinate 16.0 0 – 18.00 meeting of Scientific Committee (last details on the Symp 269; information on the IYA closing ceremony program) 18.00 – 20.00 welcome reception Thursday 7, morning: Aula Magna University 8:30 – late registrations 09.00 – 09.30 Welcome Addresses (Rector of University, President of COSPAR, Representative of ESA, President of IAU, Mayor of Padova, Barbieri) Session 1, The discovery of the Medicean Moons, the history, the influence on human sciences Chair: R. Williams Speaker Title 09.30 – 09.55 (1) G. Coyne Galileo's telescopic observations: the marvel and meaning of discovery 09.55 – 10.20 (2) D. Sobel Popular Perceptions of Galileo 10.20 – 10.45 (3) T. Owen The slow growth of human humility (read by Scott Bolton) 10.45 – 11.10 (4) G. Peruzzi A new Physics to support the Copernican system. Gleanings from Galileo's works 11.10 – 11.35 Coffee break Session 1b Chair: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Michael John Thompson
    Curriculum Vitae Michael John Thompson Michael J. Thompson, MA, PhD, FRAS Interim President, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA Contact Details Work tel: +1 303 497 1652 E-mail: [email protected] Web: https://president.ucar.edu/ Home address: 5840 Flagstaff Road, Boulder, CO 80302, USA Home tel: +1 303 443 3816 Postgraduate Employment 2010 { National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) Interim UCAR President (2015 { ) NCAR Deputy Director, and Chief Operating Officer (2013 { ) NCAR Associate Director (2010 { 2013) Director of the High Altitude Observatory (2010 { 2014) NCAR Senior Scientist (2010 { ) 2004 { 2015 University of Sheffield Professor of Applied Mathematics & Solar Physics Head of School of Mathematics & Statistics (2007 { 2010) Chair of School of Mathematics & Statistics (2005 { 2007) Head of Department of Applied Mathematics (2004 { 2007) 2001 { 2004 Imperial College London Professor of Physics Deputy Head of the Space & Atmospheric Physics Group (2003 { 2004) 1990 { 2000 Queen Mary, University of London Reader in Mathematics and Astronomy (1996 { 2000) Lecturer in Astronomy (1990 { 1996) SERC Postdoctoral Fellow (1990 { 1992) 1990 Institute for Theoretical Physics, Univ. California Santa Barbara Post-doctoral researcher 1988 { 1989 High Altitude Observatory, Boulder CO, USA Visiting scientist 1987 { 1988 Institute for Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark Post-doctoral researcher 1981 { 1983 Pafec Ltd., Nottingham, U.K. Management trainee Academic qualifications PhD (1988; University of Cambridge); MA (1985; University of Cambridge); Cert. Advanced Studies in Mathematics, with distinction (1984; University of Cambridge); BA Hons (1981; University of Cambridge).
    [Show full text]
  • Kepler Mission Stellar and Instrument Noise Properties
    University of Birmingham Kepler Mission stellar and instrument noise properties Gilliland, Ronald L.; Chaplin, William J.; Dunham, Edward W.; Argabright, Vic S.; Borucki, William J.; Basri, Gibor; Bryson, Stephen T.; Buzasi, Derek L.; Caldwell, Douglas A.; Elsworth, Yvonne P.; Jenkins, Jon M.; Koch, David G.; Kolodziejczak, Jeffrey; Miglio, Andrea; Van Cleve, Jeffrey; Walkowicz, Lucianne M.; Welsh, William F. DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/6 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Gilliland, RL, Chaplin, WJ, Dunham, EW, Argabright, VS, Borucki, WJ, Basri, G, Bryson, ST, Buzasi, DL, Caldwell, DA, Elsworth, YP, Jenkins, JM, Koch, DG, Kolodziejczak, J, Miglio, A, Van Cleve, J, Walkowicz, LM & Welsh, WF 2011, 'Kepler Mission stellar and instrument noise properties', Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series, vol. 197, no. 1, 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/6 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: © American Astronomical Society. Published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series - http://iopscience.iop.org/0067-0049/197/1/6/. Eligibility for repository checked August 2014. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Prospects for Helioseismology
    Future Prospects for Helioseismology Michael J. Thompson High Altitude Observatory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA Abstract Helioseismology has been spectacularly successful at revealing many aspects of the Sun s internal structure and dynamics. "hat then are the new challenges and opportunities for the $eld? &n this talk & #ill briefly review the current state of helioseismology, and #ill then discuss science opportunities and future directions for observations from the ground and space. Solar oscillations: sound waves in the Sun Resonant cavities are of Refraction of #aves provides lower di*ering e+tent boundary of resonant cavity Resonant modes the sun l=-,m,. l=-,m,/ l=-,m,- 1+amples of spherical harmonics Spherical harmonic degree l, order m Schematic of a resonant mode of the sun l=/,m,0 Helioseismology Measure mode fre3uencies and other properties 1igenfunctions 4 spherical harmonics 5re3uencies νnlm(t7 depend on conditions in solar interior determining #ave propagation &nversion provides maps such as of sound speed, density and rotation Spherical harmonics Ring-Analysis Helioseismology · Observe line-of9sight velocity · 8ata used in this talk are 68opplergrams7! from SOHO/MD& · Make plane-wave decomposition of patches 6tiles) of the solar disk y t + :omography · 2ake surface observations at end-points of ray paths of waves propagating through the solar interior · Cross9correlating the observational signal at the two end-points reveals the wave travel time between the two points · &nversions of those travel times then reveal the subsurface structure and dynamics 6and magnetic field) Temperature Sound-speed inferences Convection zone Build-up of helium* Gravitational settling 2 ∝ Γ µ Opacity c 1T / Helium ionization zone Base of convection zone (Sound speed is in units of hundreds of km/s) ;&ndirect inference from small fre3uency separations Solar Rotation and the Tachocline Solar rotation Solar tachocline Near-surface Tachocline shear layer Tachocline lies substantially<.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroseismology of Solar-Type Stars with Kepler I: Data Analysis C
    Asteroseismology of solar-type stars with Kepler I: Data analysis C. Karoff, W.J. Chaplin, Thierry Appourchaux, Y. Elsworth, R.A. Garcia, G. Houdek, T.S. Metcalfe, J. Molenda-Żakowicz, M.J.P.F.G. Monteiro, M.J. Thompson, et al. To cite this version: C. Karoff, W.J. Chaplin, Thierry Appourchaux, Y. Elsworth, R.A. Garcia, et al.. Asteroseismology of solar-type stars with Kepler I: Data analysis. Astronomical Notes / Astronomische Nachrichten, Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2010, 331 (9-10), pp.972-976. 10.1002/asna.201011438. hal-00683333 HAL Id: hal-00683333 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00683333 Submitted on 18 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Astron. Nachr. / AN 331, No. 9/10, 972 – 976 (2010) / DOI 10.1002/asna.201011438 Asteroseismology of solar-type stars with Kepler I: Data analysis C. Karoff1,2,, W.J. Chaplin1, T. Appourchaux3,Y.Elsworth1,R.A.Garcia4, G. Houdek5, T.S. Metcalfe6, J. Molenda-Zakowicz˙ 7, M.J.P.F.G. Monteiro8, M.J. Thompson9, J. Christensen- Dalsgaard2, R.L. Gilliland10,H.Kjeldsen2,S.Basu11, T.R. Bedding12, T.L. Campante2,8, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1908.06042V4 [Astro-Ph.SR] 21 Jan 2020 Which Are Born on the Interface Between the Tachocline and the Overshoot Layer, Are Developed
    Thermomagnetic Ettingshausen-Nernst effect in tachocline, magnetic reconnection phenomenon in lower layers, axion mechanism of solar luminosity variations, coronal heating problem solution and mechanism of asymmetric dark matter variations around black hole V.D. Rusov1,∗ M.V. Eingorn2, I.V. Sharph1, V.P. Smolyar1, M.E. Beglaryan3 1Department of Theoretical and Experimental Nuclear Physics, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Odessa, Ukraine 2CREST and NASA Research Centers, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. 3Department of Computer Technology and Applied Mathematics, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia Abstract It is shown that the holographic principle of quantum gravity (in the hologram of the Uni- verse, and therefore in our Galaxy, and of course on the Sun!), in which the conflict between the theory of gravitation and quantum mechanics disappears, gives rise to the Babcock-Leighton holographic mechanism. Unlike the solar dynamo models, it generates a strong toroidal mag- netic field by means of the thermomagnetic Ettingshausen-Nernst (EN) effect in the tachocline. Hence, it can be shown that with the help of the thermomagnetic EN effect, a simple estimate of the magnetic pressure of an ideal gas in the tachocline of e.g. the Sun can indirectly prove that by using the holographic principle of quantum gravity, the repulsive toroidal magnetic field Sun 7 Sun of the tachocline (Btacho = 4:1 · 10 G = −Bcore) precisely \neutralizes" the magnetic field in the Sun core, since the projections of the magnetic fields in the tachocline and the core have equal values but opposite directions. The basic problem is a generalized problem of the antidy- namo model of magnetic flux tubes (MFTs), where the nature of both holographic effects (the thermomagnetic EN effect and Babcock-Leighton holographic mechanism), including magnetic cycles, manifests itself in the modulation of asymmetric dark matter (ADM) and, consequently, the solar axion in the Sun interior.
    [Show full text]