Ingmar Bergman's Nested Dolls
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES INGMAR BERGMAN’S NESTED DOLLS NARRATIVITY AND FICTIONALITY IN CINEMA SAMINDA SUNIMAL RANAWAKA A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Anglia Ruskin University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Submitted: April 2019 ii Dedication Ingmar Bergman and other explorers and scholars of cinema Acknowledgements My Mother For always encouraging my studies irrespective of the end goal My Wife and Children For their sincere and persistent attempts at freeing me from my family commitments Dr Jennifer George For her invaluable and voluntary help in the challenging moments of my academic life Professor Rowland Wymer For interesting discussions and offering access to his private library Professor Henrik Skov Nielsen and Professor Aaron Meskin For generously offering their constructive views and resources on new literature John White For offering considerate and necessary resistance to my work with his supervision Dr Tory Young For being the ideal first supervisor who was always bright, accessible, and persuasive i ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT FACULTY OF ARTS, LAW, AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INGMAR BERGMAN’S NESTED DOLLS: NARRATIVITY AND FICTIONALITY IN CINEMA SAMINDA RANAWAKA April 2019 Swedish filmmaker Ingmar Bergman’s cinema is often seen as a classic nexus between several generic categories: narrative, fiction, art cinema, auteur films. While generic approaches pursue the potential traits and underlying structures that distinguish one class from another, they also ingrain and idealise restrictive preconceptions. By exploring Bergman’s formally and thematically related The Silence (1963) and the prologue of Persona (1966), my research attests that generic approaches are seriously inadequate to explain the multidimensionality of cinematic narrative. In the first part of my study, I develop a three-tier analytical framework by reviewing the key approaches to narrative and cinematic fiction. Considering the insights of rhetorical narratology and C.S. Peirce’s sign theory, I also postulate applicable theses for narrativity and fictionality in the cinematic context. The second part of the study demonstrates that this nested narratological model offers an illuminating approach to elaborate on how audiences exploit cinematic narrativity and fictionality as communicational resources and acts. Instead of relying on the predetermined macro-structures like syuzhet, plot, fabula, or story of Bergman’s individual films, I explore micro-relations of Bergman’s cinema across the proposed analytical tiers offering new readings of these canonical films. Bergman’s cinema not only advances cinematic images, experiences, and their references temporally with narrativity but also stratifies them across various levels with cinematic fictionality. Thus, cinematic narrativity not only hinges on the diegetic tier (or structural-story), but the extra-diegetic and thematic tiers also determine narrativity. The immediate experience and discursive dynamics in Bergman’s cinema interweave author, audience, actors, medium, themes, and other artworks into integrated textual threads with fictional characters, events, and stories. My study argues that cinematic narrative is not a predefined medium, component, or structure, but a text-external communicational event that engenders multifarious cinematic effects and signifying instances. As its original contribution to knowledge, I elaborate cinematic narrativity and fictionality as referential dynamics as well as communicational resources. These resources integrate immediate cinematic experience as well as interpretive engagement for communicational goals. I also maintain that my exploration helps to revisit the ambivalent takes on cinematic authorship, communication, and fiction/reality dichotomy. Keywords: art cinema, narrativity, fictionality, rhetorical narrative theory, Bergman ii Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Cinematic Image and Its Narratives .................................................................... 1 1.1.1. The Phenomenal Experience of Cinema .................................................... 1 1.1.2. The Diegetic Story ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3. The Non-Fictional Story ............................................................................. 3 1.1.4. The Thematic Story .................................................................................... 4 1.1.5. Resistance to the Stories ........................................................................... 5 1.2. Cinematic Acts and Resources ........................................................................... 6 1.3. Cinematic Narrative as an Event ......................................................................... 7 1.3.1. Images and Narrative ................................................................................. 7 1.3.2. Narrative and the Story .............................................................................. 9 1.3.3. Structural Story and Excess ..................................................................... 12 1.4. Representation as Narrativity and Fictionality ................................................... 14 1.5. Ingmar Bergman and Image Making ................................................................. 16 1.6. Research Methodology and Structure .............................................................. 21 1.6.1. Research Context and Focus ................................................................... 21 1.6.2. Research Goals and Outcome ................................................................. 22 1.6.3. Thesis Structure ....................................................................................... 22 Part 1 …………………………………………………………………………………………...25 2. Narrativity as Textual Progression .................................................................... 27 2.1. Narrative Definitions and Their Nested Problems ............................................. 28 2.2. Narrative Dualisms and Their Genealogy .......................................................... 33 2.2.1. Play and Plot ............................................................................................ 33 2.2.2. Syuzhet and Fabula .................................................................................. 35 2.2.3. Story and Discourse ................................................................................. 38 2.3. Beyond Dualism: Narrative to Narrativity .......................................................... 43 2.4. Peircean Signs: Infinite Semiosis ...................................................................... 46 2.5. Semiosis: Dynamic Narrativity ........................................................................... 49 2.6. Narrative and Its Nested Junctures ................................................................... 51 2.7. Narrative Semiosis: Revisiting Narrativity .......................................................... 54 iii 3. Nested Dolls of Cinema: A Framework ............................................................ 61 3.1. The Three Tiers of Cinematic Narrative ............................................................ 62 3.2. The Diegetic Tier of Cinema ............................................................................. 65 3.2.1. Diegetic Tier as The Story ........................................................................ 65 3.2.2. The Diegetic Tier as The Phenomenal Experience .................................. 68 3.2.3. Diegetic Tier as a Rhetorical Resource .................................................... 70 3.3. The Extra-Diegetic Tier of Cinema ................................................................... 72 3.3.1. Extra-Diegetic Frame and Perspective .................................................... 72 3.3.2. Narrative Stylistics ................................................................................... 75 3.3.3. Excess and Materiality ............................................................................. 77 3.4. The Thematic Tier of Cinema ........................................................................... 79 3.4.1. Theme as a Metaphor .............................................................................. 79 3.4.2. The Real-World as a Theme .................................................................... 80 3.5. Nested Paradoxes in Cinema ........................................................................... 82 3.5.1. Cinematic Engagement ........................................................................... 82 3.5.2. Cinematic Reduction ............................................................................... 83 3.5.3. Cinematic Heterogeneity ......................................................................... 87 3.5.4. Fictionality in General .............................................................................. 88 3.5.5. Cinematic Fictionality .............................................................................. 91 3.6. From Phenomenality to Signs .......................................................................... 94 3.6.1. Cinematic Signs and The Referential Act ................................................ 94 3.6.2. Cinematic Phenomenology as Semiosis ................................................. 95 3.7. Cinematic Author