DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Hill Restoration Forest Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Red Hill Restoration Forest Service Environmental Assessment April 2013 Hood River Ranger District Mt. Hood National Forest Hood River County, Oregon Legal Description: T1S R8-9E; T2S, R8E; Willamette Meridian West Fork Hood River Watershed United States Department of Agriculture Red Hill Restoration Forest Service Environmental Assessment April 2013 Hood River Ranger District Mt. Hood National Forest Hood River County, Oregon Legal Description: T1S R8-9E; T2S, R8E; Willamette Meridian Lead Agency: U.S. Forest Service Responsible Official: Claire Lavendel, Forest Supervisor Mt. Hood National Forest Information Contact: Jennie O'Connor Card Hood River Ranger District 6780 Highway 35 Mount Hood/Parkdale, OR 97041 (541) 352-6002 [email protected] Project Website: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda- pop.php/?project=35969 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i Summary ............................................................................................................................ iii CHAPTER 1 – Introduction ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Document Structure ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 Management Direction ................................................................................ 1-4 1.3.2 Desired Future Condition / Land Allocations ............................................. 1-5 1.4 Proposed Action ................................................................................................. 1-12 1.5 Decision Framework .......................................................................................... 1-14 1.6 Public Involvement ............................................................................................ 1-14 1.6.1 Collaboration ............................................................................................. 1-14 1.6.2 Scoping/Publication Involvement ............................................................. 1-16 1.7 Issues .................................................................................................................. 1-17 CHAPTER 2 – Alternatives, including the Proposed Action .................................... 2-1 2.1 No Action Alternative .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Vegetation Treatments ................................................................................ 2-2 2.2.2 Variable Density Thinning .......................................................................... 2-5 2.2.3 Economics ................................................................................................. 2-10 2.2.4 Temporary Roads ...................................................................................... 2-11 2.2.5 Landings .................................................................................................... 2-13 2.2.5 Riparian Prescriptions ............................................................................... 2-15 2.2.6 Road Decommissioning and Road Closures ............................................. 2-18 2.2.7 Road Reconstruction/Maintenance ........................................................... 2-21 2.3 Project Design Criteria/Mitigation Measures .................................................... 2-23 2.3.1 Design Criteria/Mitigation Measures for Vegetation Treatments ............ 2-23 2.3.2 Design Criteria/Mitigation Measures for Road Decommissioning .......... 2-33 2.4 Monitoring Requirements .................................................................................. 2-35 2.5 Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Detailed Study ......................... 2-37 2.6 Mt. Hood Land and Resource Management Consistency .................................. 2-39 2.6.1 Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines ....................................................... 2-39 2.6.2 National Forest Management Act Findings for Vegetation Manipulation .......................................................................... 2-39 2.6.3 Best Management Practices ...................................................................... 2-40 CHAPTER 3 –Environmental Consequences ............................................................. 3-1 3.1 Vegetation Resources ........................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Transportation System ....................................................................................... 3-19 3.3 Geology .............................................................................................................. 3-33 3.4 Soil Productivity ................................................................................................ 3-37 Hood River Ranger District Mt. Hood National Forest i 3.5 Water Quality ..................................................................................................... 3-47 3.6 Fisheries and Aquatic Fauna .............................................................................. 3-75 3.7 Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives ...................................................... 3-144 3.8 Wildlife ............................................................................................................ 3-146 3.9 Botany .............................................................................................................. 3-172 3.10 Invasive Plant Species.................................................................................... 3-185 3.11 Recreation and Visual Quality ....................................................................... 3-190 3.12 Fuels Management and Air Quality ............................................................... 3-199 3.13 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................... 3-208 3.14 Climate Change .............................................................................................. 3-212 3.15 Environmental Justice and Civil Rights ......................................................... 3-213 3.16 Conflicts with Plans, Policies or Other Jurisdictions ..................................... 3-214 CHAPTER 4 – Consultation and Coordination .......................................................... 4-1 4.1 Federal, State, and Local Agencies ...................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service ....................... 4-1 4.1.2 Consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service ............................... 4-1 4.1.3 Consultation with the Oregon SHPO ....................................................... 4-2 4.1.4 Consultation with City of Hood River ..................................................... 4-2 4.2 Tribes ................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 List of Preparers ................................................................................................... 4-3 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... Ref-1 APPENDIX 1 – COLLABORATIVE GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2 – BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICVES FOR WATER QUALITY PROTECTION APPENDIX 3 – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Hood River Ranger District Mt. Hood National Forest ii SUMMARY The Red Hill Restoration project is located on the Hood River Ranger District within the West Fork Hood River Watershed. The project area includes approximately 12,000 acres. About 90% of the project area is within C1 (Timber Emphasis) land allocation, with the majority (80%) in Matrix lands. The stand composition, structure and densities in the project area have been altered by fire suppression efforts over the past 100 years; favorable climatic conditions for vegetation growth; and, increased presence and scale of native and non-native insects and diseases. This high density of the stands contributes to mortality of trees because of competition for nutrients,
Recommended publications
  • Notice of Project Scoping Meeting by the City of Chula Vista

    Notice of Project Scoping Meeting by the City of Chula Vista

    NOTICE OF PROJECT SCOPING MEETING BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA has called and will convene a public project scoping meeting as summarized below: PROJECT: Environmental Impact Report (EIR20-0001) for the Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital PURPOSE: Solicit public comment on the type and extent of the environmental analyses to be performed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), such as: Land Use, Aesthetics, Air Quality, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Public Services, Transportation/Circulation, and Wildlife. DATES: August 31 to September 29, 2020 online (see review and commenting instructions below) The purpose of a public scoping meeting is to inform the public that the lead agency, the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department (DSD), is evaluating a project under CEQA and set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21065 to solicit public comment regarding the type and extent of environmental analyses to be undertaken. At the scoping stage, DSD describes the preliminary concept of the project, and asks for public feedback regarding the scope of the EIR. Under normal circumstances, public scoping meetings are held in a public location in the community near the location of the proposed project. Pursuant to the Governor of the State of California's executive order N-29-20, and in the interest of the public health and safety, the public may participate virtually in this project scoping meeting. HOW TO REVIEW THE PRESENTATION: Members of the public will be able to access a link to watch a pre- recorded presentation via livestream at https://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development- services/planning/public-notices/virtual-meetings.
  • Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C

    Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C

    Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C. T. Geppert FLEETING CITIES Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe Co-Edited EUROPEAN EGO-HISTORIES Historiography and the Self, 1970–2000 ORTE DES OKKULTEN ESPOSIZIONI IN EUROPA TRA OTTO E NOVECENTO Spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni ORTSGESPRÄCHE Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert NEW DANGEROUS LIAISONS Discourses on Europe and Love in the Twentieth Century WUNDER Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert Imagining Outer Space European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Edited by Alexander C. T. Geppert Emmy Noether Research Group Director Freie Universität Berlin Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Alexander C. T. Geppert 2012 Chapter 6 (by Michael J. Neufeld) © the Smithsonian Institution 2012 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
  • Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report

    Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report

    CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4
  • Ithaca Classified Business Directory 1935

    Ithaca Classified Business Directory 1935

    JAMIESON - McKINNEY COMPANY HOME HUMIDIFYING SYSTEMS AND HOT WATER 115-121 S. CAYUGA ST. PHONE 3434 1935-ITHAcA DIRECTORY-1935 379 MANNING'S Ithaca Classified Business Directory 1935 Copyright 1935, by H. A. Manning Co. *Indicates heading given by special arrangement with publishers *ABDOMINAL SUPPORTERS (BRANDS) FAHEY EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, 124 E PARADOX, AB Brooks & Son, 126 E State, State, see p 66 see p 67 Student Agencies (Inc), 409 College av ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS Boynton Leland C, 1006 EState AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS MAXFIELD TERRELL B, Savings Bank Anderson & Eddy Implement Co, 107 E bldg (219), see p 60 Green LANG JB ENGINE & GARAGE CO, 117 E *ACCOUNTING SCHOOLS Green, see p 43 (See Business Colleges) AIR BRUSH (PHOTOGRAPHY) *ACETYLENE WELDING FRANZ STUDIO THE, 214 E State, see p 80 CARL'S GARAGE, 201 E Tompkins, see back cover AIR CONDITIONING LANG'S PALACE GARAGE, 117-133 E JAMIESON-McKINNEY CO, 115-121 S Green, see p 43 Cayuga, see top margins REYNOLDS & DRAKE GARAGE CO, 216 S Cayuga, see front cover and p 45 AIRPORTS ADVERTISING AGENCIES Ithaca Flying Service, Taughannock blvd Agricultural Advertising and Research Ser­ Ithaca Municipal Airport, Taughannock blvd vice, 110 N Tioga Ithaca Sales & Pedigree Co, 513 N Tioga ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTRAl BUREAUS Roberts Grace E, 316 N Aurora Tompkins County Alcoholic Control Board 202 EState (601) *ADVERTISING SIGNS (See Sign Painters and Manufacturers) *ALUMINUM AND ENAMEL WARE AGENCIES ROTHSCHILD BROS, 155-59 E State and CO-OPERATIVE GLF EXCHANGE INC, 100-26 S Tioga, see p 7 Seneca bldg, 112 E Seneca RUMSEY CJ & CO, 206 E State, see p 64 CAREY BLDG.
  • Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1991 Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park William Henry Stiver University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Stiver, William Henry, "Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1991. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2517 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William Henry Stiver entitled "Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Michael R. Pelton, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Boyd L. Dearden, James L. Schmidhammer Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William Henry Stiver entitled "Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park." I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science .
  • Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice

    Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice

    Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A.
  • The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra

    The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra

    THE COMPOSITION OF THE LUNAR CRUST: RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF LUNAR VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS DECEMBER 2009 By Joshua T.S. Cahill Dissertation Committee: Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson G. Jeffrey Taylor Patricia Fryer Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis Trevor Sorensen Student: Joshua T.S. Cahill Student ID#: 1565-1460 Field: Geology and Geophysics Graduation date: December 2009 Title: The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra We certify that we have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology and Geophysics. Dissertation Committee: Names Signatures Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson ____________________________ G. Jeffrey Taylor ____________________________ Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis ____________________________ Patricia Fryer ____________________________ Trevor Sorensen ____________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must first express my love and appreciation to my family. Thank you to my wife Karen for providing love, support, and perspective. And to our little girl Maggie who only recently became part of our family and has already provided priceless memories in the form of beautiful smiles, belly laughs, and little bear hugs. The two of you provided me with the most meaningful reasons to push towards the "finish line". I would also like to thank my immediate and extended family. Many of them do not fully understand much about what I do, but support the endeavor acknowledging that if it is something I’m willing to put this much effort into, it must be worthwhile.
  • NASA Ames to Establish Nationwide Lunar Science Institute

    NASA Ames to Establish Nationwide Lunar Science Institute

    November 2007 Worden gives upbeat message about future work for Ames BY JOHN BLUCK "We have switched material to In an upbeat talk to a crowd that phenolic impregnated carbon abla- filled the Ames main auditorium, tor (PICA), a (heat shield) material Ames Center Director S. Pete Worden developed here," Worden noted. His outlined an exciting future at Ames projected slide also listed Ames as that includes new work in exploration, leading PICA development and test- science and aeronautics -- each about a ing both for the Crew Exploration Ve- third of the center's efforts, he said. "I hicle, now called Orion, and the Mars have a gazillion charts to go through," Science Laboratory (MSL), which has photo by Eric James NASA he said. a planned launch date in fall 2009. His wide-ranging presentation Worden said that Ames' arc jets about Ames touched on moon explo- facility "a unique facility in the world." ration, a lunar institute, moon dust re- He added, "We want to upgrade search, heat shield work for spacecraft them." destined for the moon and Mars, a Mars sample "cache box" assignment, Life Sciences rising supercomputer capability, small "We are getting additional life Ames Center Director S. Pete Worden responds satellite work with a potential for support tasks assigned by Johnson to a question during the recent upbeat talk he many missions, increased astrobiology (and Marshall)," Worden said. "This is gave to the center about the future of Ames. work, growing cooperation among significant." continued on page 5 academia, and commercial partners and Ames and much more.
  • South Pole-Aitken Basin

    South Pole-Aitken Basin

    Feasibility Assessment of All Science Concepts within South Pole-Aitken Basin INTRODUCTION While most of the NRC 2007 Science Concepts can be investigated across the Moon, this chapter will focus on specifically how they can be addressed in the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). SPA is potentially the largest impact crater in the Solar System (Stuart-Alexander, 1978), and covers most of the central southern farside (see Fig. 8.1). SPA is both topographically and compositionally distinct from the rest of the Moon, as well as potentially being the oldest identifiable structure on the surface (e.g., Jolliff et al., 2003). Determining the age of SPA was explicitly cited by the National Research Council (2007) as their second priority out of 35 goals. A major finding of our study is that nearly all science goals can be addressed within SPA. As the lunar south pole has many engineering advantages over other locations (e.g., areas with enhanced illumination and little temperature variation, hydrogen deposits), it has been proposed as a site for a future human lunar outpost. If this were to be the case, SPA would be the closest major geologic feature, and thus the primary target for long-distance traverses from the outpost. Clark et al. (2008) described four long traverses from the center of SPA going to Olivine Hill (Pieters et al., 2001), Oppenheimer Basin, Mare Ingenii, and Schrödinger Basin, with a stop at the South Pole. This chapter will identify other potential sites for future exploration across SPA, highlighting sites with both great scientific potential and proximity to the lunar South Pole.
  • Appendix a Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable

    Appendix a Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable

    Appendix A Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable, or Possible Distal Ejecta Layers A.1 Introduction In this appendix we discuss the methods that we have used to recover and study ejecta found in various types of sediment and rock. The processes used to recover ejecta material vary with the degree of lithification. We thus discuss sample processing for unconsolidated, semiconsolidated, and consolidated material separately. The type of sediment or rock is also important as, for example, carbonate sediment or rock is processed differently from siliciclastic sediment or rock. The methods used to take and process samples will also vary according to the objectives of the study and the background of the investigator. We summarize below the methods that we have found useful in our studies of distal impact ejecta layers for those who are just beginning such studies. One of the authors (BPG) was trained as a marine geologist and the other (BMS) as a hard rock geologist. Our approaches to processing and studying impact ejecta differ accordingly. The methods used to recover ejecta from unconsolidated sediments have been successfully employed by BPG for more than 40 years. A.2 Taking and Handling Samples A.2.1 Introduction The size, number, and type of samples will depend on the objective of the study and nature of the sediment/rock, but there a few guidelines that should be followed regardless of the objective or rock type. All outcrops, especially those near industrialized areas or transportation routes (e.g., highways, train tracks) need to be cleaned off (i.e., the surface layer removed) prior to sampling.
  • Odd Year Nur-Rn-Lic-30550 G

    Odd Year Nur-Rn-Lic-30550 G

    LicenseNumber FirstName MiddleName LastName RenewalGroup NUR-LPN-LIC-6174 DOLORES ROSE AABERG 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-30550 GRETCHEN ELLEN AAGAARD-SHIVELY 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-128118 CAMBRIA LAUREN AANERUD 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-25862 SOPHIA SABINA AANSTAD 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-APRN-LIC-124944 ERIN EDWARD AAS 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-105371 ERIN EDWARD AAS 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-34536 BRYON AAS 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-39208 JULIA LYNN AASEN 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-APRN-LIC-130522 LORI ANN AASEN 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-130520 LORI ANN AASEN 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-21015 DEBBIE ABAR 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-APRN-LIC-130757 LUKE G ABAR 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-130756 LUKE GORDON ABAR 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-31911 AIMEE KRISTINE ABBOTT 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-29448 DENISE M ABBOTT 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-131150 SARAH FRANCES ABBOTT 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-LPN-LIC-31701 ANGIE ABBOTT 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-LPN-LIC-33325 HEIDI ABBOTT 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-LPN-LIC-4920 LORI ANN ABBOTT 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-LPN-LIC-97426 DAYMON ABBOTT Expired - 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-13260 ROBERT C ABBOTT Expired - 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-17858 MONICA MAY ABDALLAH 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-48890 STEVEN P ABDALLAH 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-APRN-LIC-101391 LANEICE LORRAINE ABDEL-SHAKUR Expired - 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-101333 LANEICE LORRAINE ABDEL-SHAKUR Expired - 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-96606 RENDI L ABEL 2018 - EVEN YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-97338 LAURA ANN ABEL 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-69876 LACEY ANN ABELL 2019 - ODD YEAR NUR-RN-LIC-131932
  • R-700 MIT's ROLE in PROJECT APOLLO VOLUME I PROJECT

    R-700 MIT's ROLE in PROJECT APOLLO VOLUME I PROJECT

    R-700 MIT’s ROLE IN PROJECT APOLLO FINAL REPORT ON CONTRACTS NAS 9-153 AND NAS 9-4065 VOLUME I PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACTS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY edited by James A. Hand OCTOBER 1971 CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS, 02139 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared under DSR Project 55-23890, sponsored by the Manned Spacecraft Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The description of project management was prepared by James A. Hand and is based, in large part, upon discussions with Dr. C. Stark Draper, Ralph R. Ragan, David G. Hoag and Lewis E. Larson. Robert C. Millard and William A. Stameris also contributed to this volume. The publication of this document does not constitute approval by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the findings or conclusions contained herein. It is published for the exchange and stimulation of ideas. @ Copyright by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Published by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Printed in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U. S. A., 1972 ii The title of these volumes, “;LJI’I”s Role in Project Apollo”, provides but a mcdest hint of the enormous range of accomplishments by the staff of this Laboratory on behalf of the Apollo program. Rlanss rush into spaceflight during the 1060s demanded fertile imagination, bold pragmatism, and creative extensions of existing tecnnologies in a myriad of fields, The achievements in guidance and control for space navigation, however, are second to none for their critical importance in the success of this nation’s manned lunar-landing program, for while powerful space vehiclesand rockets provide the environment and thrust necessary for space flight, they are intrinsicaily incapable of controlling or guiding themselves on a mission as complicated and sophisticated as Apollo.