Initial Environmental Examination
Project Number: 47279-002 July 2019
PAK: Karachi Bus Rapid Transit Red Line Project
Development of Staging Facility (Underneath Karachi Goan Association Cricket Ground)
Prepared by the Transport and Mass Transit Department, provincial Government of Sindh for the Asian Development Bank.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 19 July 2019)
Currency unit – Pakistan rupee (PRs) PRs1.00 = $0.00625 $1.00 = PRs160
ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BRT – bus rapid transit DoF – Department of Forests EA – environmental assessment EAAC – Environmental Assessment Advisory Committee EARF – environment assessment review framework EIA – environment impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan EPA – Environmental Protection Agency GOP – Government of Pakistan GoS – Government of Sindh IA – implementing agency IEE – initial environmental examination KGA – Karachi Goan Association km – kilometer LAA – Land Acquisition Act (of 1984) LARP – land acquisition and resettlement plan Leq – equivalent sound pressure level NEQS – national environmental quality standards NGO – nongovernment organization O&M – operation & maintenance PAP – Project-affected person PC – public consultation PEPAct – Pakistan Environment Protection Act 1997 PFS – prefeasibility study PMU – Project Management Unit RP – resettlement plan SC – Steering Committee SEPA – Sindh Environmental Protection Agency SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement TMTD – Transport and Mass Transit Department tpd – tonnes per day
NOTE In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated.
This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Content Details
S/No. Version Date Summary of Revisions made 1 1 19-7-19 First Draft of IEE report
Table of Content
1 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Project Background ...... 1 1.2 Project Objective ...... 1 1.3 Environmental Category of the Project ...... 2 1.4 Methodology of IEE Study ...... 2 1.5 Proponent of Project ...... 2 1.6 Structure of the Report ...... 2 1.7 Further Additions & Updating of IEE study ...... 3 2 Policy and Legal Framework ...... 5 2.1 General ...... 5 2.2 National Policy and Legal Framework ...... 5 2.3 Regulations for Environmental Assessment, Pakistan EPA ...... 5 2.4 Sindh Environmental Protection Act, 2014 ...... 5 2.5 Other National and Sindh Government Laws and Regulations ...... 7 2.6 Regulatory Clearances, Sindh EPA ...... 10 2.7 Guidelines for Environmental Assessment, Pakistan EPA ...... 10 2.8 National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS) 2000 ...... 10 2.9 Interaction with Other Agencies ...... 11 2.10 Provincial EPAs ...... 11 2.11 Provincial Departments of Forests and Wildlife ...... 11 2.12 Provincial Governments ...... 11 2.13 ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 ...... 11 2.14 ADB’s Access to Information Policy (AIP) 2018 ...... 12 2.15 ADB’s Accountability Mechanism Policy 2012...... 12 2.16 Implications of ADB’s safeguard policies on proposed project ...... 12 2.17 Comparison of International and Local Environmental Legislations ...... 14 3 Description of the Project ...... 19 3.1 Project Overview ...... 19 3.2 Justification and Need for Project ...... 20 3.3 Project Construction Schedule ...... 20 3.4 Construction Camps and Work Force ...... 20 3.5 Machinery Requirement ...... 24 4 Description of Environment ...... 25 4.1 General ...... 25 4.2 Physical Resources ...... 25
4.2.1 Meteorological Parameters ...... 25 4.2.2 Air Quality ...... 30 4.2.3 Noise ...... 33 4.2.4 Climate Change and Effects ...... 33 4.3 Geology, Soils and Groundwater ...... 36 4.3.1 Seismic activity ...... 37 4.4 Hydrology, Water Quality and Sediment ...... 39 4.4.1 Ground Water Quality ...... 41 4.4.2 Climate Vulnerability—Flooding ...... 41 4.5 Biological Resources ...... 42 4.5.1 Flora ...... 42 4.5.2 Fauna ...... 43 4.6 Socioeconomic Resources ...... 46 4.6.1 Population ...... 46 4.6.2 Land Use ...... 49 4.6.3 Physical Infrastructure ...... 50 4.7 Physical Cultural Resources ...... 54 4.7.1 Religious, Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Sites ...... 54 5 Analysis of Alternatives ...... 55 5.1 Overview ...... 55 5.2 ‘No Project’ Option ...... 55 5.3 Rationale for selected Staging Facility Location ...... 55 Alternative Location Options ...... 55 5.4 Assessment of alternatives to prevent demolition of associated facilities .. 56 6 Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...... 57 6.1 Design/Pre-Construction Phase ...... 57 Avoidance of demolition of Associated Facilities ...... 57 Relocation of Utilities ...... 58 Identification of Locations for Labor Camps and ancillary facilities ...... 58 Development of Traffic Management Plan ...... 59 6.2 Construction Phase ...... 60 Traffic Management ...... 64 Air Quality ...... 66 Noise Levels ...... 70 Excavated Material (Earthworks) Disposal ...... 73 Community Health and Safety ...... 73 Worker Health and Safety...... 75
Water Resources ...... 75 Camp & Batching plant effluent ...... 76 Soil Erosion and Sedimentation ...... 76 Soil Contamination ...... 76 Drainage and Storm Water Run-off ...... 77 Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Waste Management ...... 77 Historical/Archaeological Sites ...... 78 Vegetation and Wildlife Loss ...... 78 Employment Conflicts ...... 79 Communicable Diseases ...... 80 Loss of Access around Project Site ...... 80 Land Use and Aesthetics ...... 80 Natural and Man made Hazards ...... 80 6.3 Operation Phase...... 81 Air Quality ...... 82 Noise Levels ...... 83 Solid Waste disposal ...... 83 Land Contamination ...... 84 Socioeconomic ...... 84 6.4 Cumulative Impacts ...... 84 6.5 Indirect and Induced Impacts ...... 85 7 Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan ...... 86 7.1 Introduction ...... 86 7.2 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) ...... 86 7.3 Objectives of EMP ...... 86 7.4 Environmental Management Framework ...... 87 7.4.1 Roles of TMTD PIU and SMTA ...... 87 7.4.2 Roles of CSC Consultants during Design/Construction ...... 87 7.4.3 Role of the Contractor ...... 87 7.4.4 Role of Sindh EPA ...... 89 7.5 Environmental Management/Monitoring and Reporting ...... 89 7.6 Monitoring Parameters ...... 89 7.7 Environmental Training ...... 89 Capacity Building and Training ...... 89 7.8 Further Additions & Updating of IEE study & EMP ...... 90 7.9 Environmental Management Costs ...... 95 8 Public Consultation and Information Disclosure...... 135
8.1 Introduction ...... 135 8.2 Objective of Consultations ...... 135 8.3 Identification of Main Stakeholders ...... 136 8.4 Approach for Public Consultation ...... 136 8.5 Consultations ...... 137 8.6 Key Discussion points ...... 137 9 Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. 9.1 General ...... 146 10 Conclusions and Recommendations ...... 149 11 References ...... 151
ANNEXURES
Annexure A Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist
Annexure B NEQS Guidelines
Annexure C Photographs of Project Area Settings
Annexure D Photographs of Public Consultations
Annexure E List of Participants of Public Consultations
Annexure F Photographs of Ambient Air Quality and Noise Monitoring
Annexure G Methodology for Air Quality and Noise Monitoring
Annexure H Results of Air Quality, Noise and Vibration Monitoring
Annexure I Traffic Management Plan
Annexure J Occupational Health and Safety Plan
Annexure K Emergency Response Plan
Annexure L Archaeological ‘Chance Find’ Procedure Annexure M ToRs of Third Party Monitor
Annexure N Certifications of SUPARCO Laboratory
Annexure O Dust Management Plan
Annexure P Site Specific EMP (SSEMP) Guide & Template for Guidance to Contractor
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Key Map of Proposed Project ...... 4
Figure 3.1: Layout of Mezzanine Level of Staging Facility ...... 21
Figure 3.2: Layout of Ground Floor of Staging Facility ...... 22
Figure 3.3: Detailed Layout of Proposed Staging Facility ...... 23
Figure 4-1: Monthly Average Precipitation (mm) and Evapotranspiration (mm) at Karachi Airport ...... 26
Figure 4-2: Minimum and maximum Precipitation (mm) and Evapotranspiration (mm) at Karachi (2009-2018) ...... 26
Figure 4-3: Monthly Averages for Mean, Maximum and Minimum Temperatures (Deg-C) at Karachi Airport ...... 27
Figure 4-4: minimum, maximum and average temperature of Karachi (2009-2018) 27
Figure 4-5 Average cloud and Humidity of Karachi (2009-2018) ...... 28
Figure 4-6: maximum and average wind speed of Karachi (2009-2018) ...... 29
Figure 4-7: Annual Wind Rose for Karachi ...... 30
Figure 4.8: Monitoring Location for Ambient Air Quality and Noise Levels ...... 32
Figure 4-9: Katchi Settlements Flooded and Dry ...... 36
Figure 4-10: Geological Map of Karachi and Surrounding Area ...... 38
Figure 4-11: Historical Reconstruction of Earthquakes in the Vicinity of Karachi and Southern Pakistan ...... 39
Figure 4-12: Generalized Schematic of Drainage Basins in Karachi Metropolitan Area ...... 41
Figure 4-13: Images of Flooding in Karachi ...... 42
Figure 4-14: Administrative map of Karachi ...... 48
Figure 4-14: Population Distribution by Area, Age and Sex...... 48
Figure 6-1: Predominant Wind Direction & Expected Impact from Dust Emissions from Construction Site ...... 68
Figure 9.1: Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 148 LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Other National and Sindh Government Laws and Regulations ...... 8
Table 4-1: Humidity and Dew Point Temperature for Karachi ...... 28
Table 4.2: Ambient Noise Monitoring Results (24 hrs) at Staging Facility Project Site ...... 33
Table 4.3: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results (24 hrs) at Staging Facility Proposed Location ...... 35
Table 4.4: Comparison of ambient air quality results versus applicable Air Quality standards ...... 35
Table 4-5: Birds of Karachi and Dow University Campuses (1996—2015) ...... 44
Table 4-6: Mammals and Reptiles Historically Present in the Area of Karachi District ...... 45
Table 4-7: District-wise 2017 Population for Karachi Division ...... 47
Table 4-8: Medical Facilities in Karachi ...... 52
Table 4-9: Mortality Statistics of Karachi and Nationwide ...... 53
Table 6.1: Associated Facilities next to KGA ground to be impacted ...... 57
Table 6.2: Screening of Possible Impacts during Construction Phase ...... 60
Table 6.3: Control measures for Fugitive Dust emissions ...... 67
Table 6.4: Construction Equipment Noise Ranges, dB(A) ...... 71
Table 6.5: Summary of Possible Impacts during Operation Phase ...... 81
Table 7.1: Pre-Construction Monitoring Requirements...... 91
Table 7.2: Construction Phase Monitoring Requirements ...... 92
Table 7.3: Operation Phase Monitoring Requirements...... 94
Table 7.4: Capacity Development and Training Programme ...... 95
Table 7.5: Annual Cost Estimates for ‘Pre-Construction Phase’ Environmental Monitoring ...... 96
Table 7.6: Annual Cost Estimates for ‘Construction Phase’ Environmental Monitoring ...... 96
Table 7.7: Annual Cost Estimates for ‘Operation Phase’ Environmental Monitoring 96
Table 7.8: Estimated Costs for EMP Implementation ...... 96
Table 7.9: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan ...... 98
Table 8.1: Summary of Public Consultations ...... 139
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project Overview
1. This IEE study has been prepared for development of a BRT vehicle staging facility under the Karachi Goan Association (KGA) ground, adjacent to Numaish station. A map of the project area is provided as Figure ES-1.
2. The KGA ground will be reconfigured to house an underground commercial area as well as a staging facility for the BRT network. The total floor area of KGA mezzanine level is 23,520 square meters.
3. As per the preliminary designs, the existing structures on the KGA ground will need to be demolished during construction, the concept design proposes to reconstruct the ground and its associated facilities on top of the Mezzanine floor at ground level. The associated facilities possess a rich historical and cultural value since they are over 100 years old, although they are not listed as national and cultural heritage by the Government of Sindh. However, during the detailed design phase, all efforts need to be made to prevent demolition of the associated facilities of the KGA ground as far as possible by considering all alternatives (technical and location related) and through continuing of the stakeholder consultative process.
4. The staging facility is proposed to be constructed at the KGA ground which will be an underground facility consisting of 2 floors having a basement or the underground level which will be used for bus lanes, drivers sitting area, dispatch center and washrooms. The Mezzanine level will be for the commuters and will have the ticketing booths, waiting and commercial areas.
5. It will also provide ease of transfer of passengers from one line to the other and include parking lots for the buses, maintenance of buses, offices, ticketing booth, waiting areas and turnaround facility for the routes that terminate at Numaish.
6. As all BRT corridors converge at Numaish station, this location holds importance in permitting customer interchange between routes. This area also holds importance as a BRT vehicle staging facility for the following reasons:
▪ Since limited space is available along the M. A. Jinnah Road to hold BRT vehicles, in order to cater the difference in demand between peak and off-peak periods, Numaish is an ideal location to stage vehicles and thus optimize operations.
▪ A staging facility at Numaish shall ensure interoperability between all corridors by ensuring physical and operational integration.
▪ A large number of BRT vehicles and people will pass through Numaish station; this gives Numaish an additional significance for potential Transit-Oriented Development (ToD).
7. Commercial activities within the system will not only enhance non-fare revenue, but also provide a sense of security around the station area.
Project Need
8. The staging facility will help in optimizing and adjusting fleet operations as the demand varies along the day. Additionally, it shall provide a turnaround facility for routes that terminate at Numaish, and will thus reduce the dead mileage for operations without passengers.
Study Methodology
9. Primary and secondary data has been collected and used to assess the environmental impacts of the Project. Detailed baseline monitoring in the project area to assess potential impacts on air quality and noise levels has been conducted and presented in this study. This IEE report highlights all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project and recommends mitigation measures. Any environmental impacts associated with the project need to be properly mitigated, through the existing institutional arrangements described in this report.
10. The significance of impacts from the proposed project were then assessed and for those impacts requiring mitigation, suitable measures were proposed to reduce impacts to within acceptable limits as per local and international applicable regulations. A detailed environmental management and monitoring plan was developed to ensure compliance to the proposed measures during the project development.
Public Consultation Process
11. Detailed and extensive consultations with different key stakeholders have been conducted to date, consisting of the KGA Ground management and the local communities residing in close proximity to the proposed project site and their comments/concerns/suggestions were obtained. Furthermore, representatives of the relevant public sector agencies such as the Karachi Municipal Corporation were also consulted. The details of the persons consulted are provided as Annexure E.
12. The key comments and concerns raised as a result of the consultations as part of the scoping activity are as follows:
▪ Restoration of existing motorbike parking space along-with the cricket ground must take place. ▪ There are some exposed and uninsulated electricity wires on the M.A Jinnah Road, which should be insulated to avoid any mishap. ▪ The work activities going on at the adjacent Green Line works creates dust emissions and the flats which are facing the M.A Jinnah Road and KGA Ground are exposed to large volumes, particularly in windy conditions.
▪ Prior notice should be provided before commencement of works for the staging facility. ▪ Dust and noise levels must be minimized through all possible measures. Sprinkling must be conducted as much as possible so that huge clouds of dust do not reach their residences. ▪ Expressed positive views about the staging facility with a major reason that the existing conditions will be restored. ▪ He mentioned that it must be ensured by the Contractor that the existing route being used for the Green Line works is used by the vehicles for the staging facility development. ▪ Access of the residences around the KGA must be blocked any more than the existing situation due to the Green line works.
▪ It was hoped that some employment opportunities will be provided for the residents for the proposed Staging facility development. ▪ It was mentioned that work in the evening hours onwards must not be allowed or must be restricted as far as possible to enable the residents to rest properly in the evenings and night-time.
▪ It must be ensured that ground is restored as per existing situation to ensure the aesthetics of the area are not adversely affected. ▪ Proper safety barricading must be installed around the work site since a deep pit will be created due to excavation and the safety of the community, particularly its children must be ensured.
▪ A Contractor that has experience and reputation for timely completion of works must be engaged to ensure the works are not delayed as is the case for the Green Line. ▪ Water sprinkling and all other required measures must be implemented to minimize dust emissions. ▪ It must be ensured that worker camps are not developed near our residences to ensure our safety and proper sanitary facilities must be provided to them to ensure they do not defecate openly. ▪ Contractor must conduct works in accordance with international best practices. ▪ Safety and convenience of the local communities must be kept a priority during the project works. Analysis of Alternatives
13. The ‘No Project’ alternative was considered, which is not a viable option since the development of the staging facility, to be part of the BRT system, will benefit millions of people using public transport in Karachi city each day that would otherwise not benefit from a sustainable, more efficient, more economical and safer transport system and would continue to suffer congestion and traffic accident risks in the city.
14. Alternative Location Option: As all BRT corridors converge at Numaish station, this location holds importance in permitting customer interchange between routes. This area also holds importance as a BRT vehicle staging facility for the following reasons:
▪ Since limited space is available along the M. A. Jinnah road to hold BRT vehicles, in order to cater the difference in demand between peak and off-peak periods, Numaish is an ideal location to stage vehicles and thus optimize operations.
▪ A staging facility at Numaish shall ensure interoperability between all corridors by ensuring physical and operational integration.
▪ A large number of BRT vehicles and people will pass through Numaish station; this gives Numaish an additional significance for potential Transit-Oriented Development (ToD).
15. Due to the factors mentioned above, the KGA ground site was selected to be the most suitable along with having the required land available to meet the Staging facility requirements.
16. As mentioned above, in order to make efforts to prevent demolition of the associated facilities located next to the KGA ground, during the detailed design phase, all potential alternatives related to technical and location related aspects of the proposed staging facility development will need to be reviewed and assessed.
Potential Major Impacts
Traffic Management
17. The traffic management plan shall be prepared by the Contractor and approved by the GoS and ADB prior to commencement of the project construction activity. The main objectives of the plan shall be to maximize the safety of the workforce and the travelling public while keeping the traffic flowing as freely as possible.
Disruption to Utilities
18. The project will require demolishing and relocating some of the structures within the ROW such as water supply pipes, drainage structures, power and communication cables. Temporary suspension of services (planned or accidental) can affect the economy, industries, businesses and residents’ daily lives.
19. All required mitigation measures shall be implemented such as planning of activities through coordination with relevant line departments to minimize impacts on utilities at
work sites in the project area, advance notices to communities to enable them to prepare for utility outages etc.
Ambient Monitoring (Air Quality & Noise Levels)
20. The EPA certified and well-reputed laboratory, SUPARCO, was engaged to conduct ambient monitoring for air quality and noise levels at the project site.
Air Quality
21. The potential impacts on air quality have been assessed for both the construction and operation phases of the project. The major impacts expected during the construction phase of the project are due to dust emissions resulting from vehicular movement, emissions from construction machinery, use of generators and construction vehicles. These impacts will be mitigated through employing of best practices such as water sprinkling, tuning and maintenance of construction equipment and vehicles, covering of materials susceptible to dust formation during transportation etc.
22. Detailed air quality monitoring at the project site has been conducted and the results
have been presented in this IEE report. As can be observed, SO2, PM2.5 and PM10 are already exceeding the permissible limits, which indicates that the airshed is already quite degraded. Thus, all possible efforts will need to be made during the construction phase through adoption of best practices to minimize any further worsening of the pollutant concentrations in the airshed of the project area.
Construction Noise impacts
23. Based on the ambient monitoring, the noise levels have been observed to be considerably exceeding the permissible levels. Thus, it will need to be ensured as part of the mitigation measures that during the construction works, at no time must the noise levels be permitted to exceed 3 dB from the ambient noise levels as per IFC guidelines.
24. As measured, existing average noise levels at the project site during daytime is 76.3 dB, in accordance to the IFC guidelines, the noise limit will be 79.3 dB. Also, duration of the anticipated noisy construction activities are expected to be short and during daytime. Therefore, residences may not object to the noise.
Land Acquisition & Resettlement
25. No land acquisition and/or resettlement shall be required for the development of the Staging facility.
Cumulative Impacts
26. The construction works for the BRT – Green Line are presently ongoing along the entire western face of the proposed KGA ground. The ongoing activities consist of major earthworks in order to develop the Numaish station and BRT corridor. However, considering the progress and completion status of these existing activities, they will
have already been completed by the time the proposed Staging Facility related construction works would commence. Thus, no Cumulative impacts are expected.
Indirect and Induced Impacts
27. The potential impact of development of the proposed Staging facility at the KGA cricket ground location has been examined, which has indicated that the existing and planned infrastructure such as water supply, wastewater collection and treatment, municipal solid waste collection and disposal would be adequate to accommodate any potential population intake as a result of the proposed project development. Impacts on the environment from air emissions, traffic and community noise, and treated effluent discharge have also been assessed and have found to be acceptable and within the carrying capacities of the environmental media. Thus, negative indirect and induced impacts from this project are not expected.
Institutional Arrangements
28. During the construction phase, the overall responsibility for the implementation and monitoring of the EMP rests with the Project Director (PD). The PD through assistance from the Supervision Consultant’s Environmental staff and the Environment team of TMTD, will supervise the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures and monitor the implementation progress in the field. Monthly environmental monitoring data/reports will be incorporated in the project implementation progress reports to be shared with ADB and such monthly reports will be consolidated into bi-annual monitoring reports and submitted to ADB for review and clearance. Upon clearance, all such reports will be uploaded on the TMTD and ADB websites.
Conclusion & Recommendations
29. An action plan with clear roles and responsibilities of stakeholders has been provided in the report. The TMTD, Contractors and the Construction Supervision Consultant are the major stakeholders responsible for the action plan. The action plan must be implemented prior to commencement of construction work.
30. Mitigation will be assured by a program of environmental monitoring conducted during construction and operation to ensure that all measures in the EMP are implemented and to determine whether the environment is protected as intended. This will include observations on and off-site, document checks, and interviews with workers and beneficiaries, and any requirements for remedial action will be reported. The engaging of external environmental monitoring consultants for ensuring efficient and effective implementation of the mitigation measures is also under consideration.
31. Therefore, the proposed Staging Facility development is likely to cause certain significant adverse impacts, mostly during the construction phase, that shall be mitigated through necessary measures. The potential adverse impacts that are associated with design, construction, and operation can be mitigated to standard levels without difficulty through proper engineering design and the incorporation or
application of recommended mitigation measures and procedures. Based on the findings of this IEE study, the classification of the Project as Category ‘A’ is confirmed. It is concluded that the proposed project should proceed, with appropriate mitigation measures and monitoring programs identified in the IEE.
32. As a result of this IEE study, it has been determined that any adverse or harmful impacts shall be effectively mitigated through implementation of necessary measures and through regular monitoring. The project falls under the Category ‘B’ of ADB's Guidelines and thus an IEE has been prepared for the proposed project.
Figure ES-1: Project Area Map
1 Introduction
1.1 Project Background 33. The proposed Staging facility will be developed as part of the BRT network being developed in Karachi city. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will be financing the development of the BRT – Red Line, the 2.4 km Common Corridor along M.A Jinnah Road (Municipal Park to Tower) and this proposed Staging Facility, located opposite Numaish station.
34. The KGA ground will be reconfigured to house an underground commercial area as well as a staging facility for the BRT network. The total floor area of KGA mezzanine level is 23,520 square meters.
35. As all BRT corridors converge at Numaish station, this location holds importance in permitting customer interchange between routes. This area also holds importance as a BRT vehicle staging facility for the following reasons:
▪ Since limited space is available along the M. A. Jinnah Road to hold BRT vehicles, in order to cater the difference in demand between peak and off-peak periods, Numaish is an ideal location to stage vehicles and thus optimize operations.
▪ A staging facility at Numaish shall ensure interoperability between all corridors by ensuring physical and operational integration.
▪ A large number of BRT vehicles and people will pass through Numaish station; this gives Numaish an additional significance for potential Transit-Oriented Development (ToD).
36. Commercial activities within the system will not only enhance non-fare revenue, but also provide a sense of security around the station area.
37. This IEE study report presents the screening of potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and contains the mitigation measures in order to eliminate or reduce the negative impacts to an acceptable level, describes the institutional requirements and provides an environmental management plan.
The project area map of the proposed project is provided as Figure 1.1 below.
1.2 Project Objective 38. The development of the Staging facility will help in optimizing and adjusting fleet operations as the demand varies along the day. Additionally, it shall provide a turnaround facility for routes that terminate at Numaish, and will thus reduce the dead mileage for operations without passengers.
Introduction 1 | Page
1.3 Environmental Category of the Project 39. According to ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009, a Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist was prepared (Annexure-A). The Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency’s “Guidelines for the Preparation and Review of Environmental Reports (2000)” were also consulted. Based on the initial findings, it was ascertained that limited adverse environmental impacts are expected due to development of the proposed Staging Facility and thus it has been classified as Category ‘B’ from environmental safeguards perspective. Thus, this IEE study has been prepared.
1.4 Methodology of IEE Study The following methodology was employed for this IEE study:
40. Available secondary data was reviewed from the existing EIA report for the Main Red Line, the finalized PC-1 document, EIA report for the Green Line and any other documents that were found to be relevant to the environmental assessment of this proposed Staging Facility.
41. Field visits were undertaken consisting of preliminary scoping through surveys and assessment activities along with primary data collection such as ambient monitoring (air quality and noise levels) and stakeholder consultations to establish the potential impacts and categorization of activities and the Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) was completed. The key receptors and stakeholders within the project area were identified.
42. Detailed and extensive stakeholder consultations have been conducted with key stakeholders such as KGA ground management, local businesses, government and local government bodies etc. in line with the national and ADB requirements.
43. The significance of impacts from the proposed project were then assessed and for those impacts requiring mitigation, suitable measures were proposed to reduce impacts to within acceptable limits as per local and international applicable regulations.
44. A detailed environmental management and monitoring plan was developed to ensure compliance to the proposed measures during the project development.
1.5 Proponent of Project 45. The Transport and Mass Transit Department (TMTD), Government of Sindh (GoS) is the proponent of the Project and all planning and execution activities will be accomplished through a designated Project Director (PD).
1.6 Structure of the Report 46. The IEE report contains eleven chapters as follows:
▪ Introduction
Introduction 2 | P a g e
▪ Policy and Legal Framework
▪ Description of the Project
▪ Description of Environment
▪ Analysis of Alternatives
▪ Assessment of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
▪ Institutional Requirements Environmental Management Plan
▪ Public Consultation
▪ Grievance Redress Mechanism
▪ Findings, Recommendations and Conclusions
▪ References
1.7 Further Additions & Updating of IEE study 47. This version of the report shall be further updated once the detailed design is completed and any other details of the proposed staging facility become available over the coming weeks and months. These revisions shall be incorporated into any subsequent updated versions of this IEE report.
Figure 1.1: Key Map of Proposed Project
Introduction 4 | Page
2 Policy and Legal Framework
2.1 General 48. This section provides an overview of the policy framework and national legislation that applies to the proposed project. The project is expected to comply with all national legislation relating to the environment in Pakistan, and to obtain all the regulatory clearances required.
2.2 National Policy and Legal Framework 49. The Pakistan National Conservation Strategy (NCS) that was approved by the federal cabinet in March 1992 is the principal policy document on environmental issues in the country (EUAD/IUCN, 1992). The NCS outlines the country's primary approach towards encouraging sustainable development, conserving natural resources, and improving efficiency in the use and management of resources. The NCS has 68 specific programs in 14 core areas in which policy intervention is considered crucial for the preservation of Pakistan's natural and physical environment. The core areas that are relevant in the context of the proposed project are pollution prevention and abatement and increasing energy efficiency while conserving biodiversity.
50. Prior to the adoption of the 18th Constitutional Amendment, the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA) 1997 was the governing law for environmental conservation in the country. Under PEPA 1997, the Pakistan Environmental Protection Council (PEPC) and Pak EPA were primarily responsible for administering PEPA 1997. Post the adoption of the 18th Constitutional Amendment in 2011, the subject of environment was devolved and the provinces have been empowered for environmental protection and conservation.
2.3 Regulations for Environmental Assessment, Pakistan EPA 51. Under Section 12 (and subsequent amendment) of the PEPA (1997), a project falling under any category specified in Schedule I of the IEE/EIA Regulations (SRO 339 (I0/2000), requires the proponent of the project to file an IEE with the concerned provincial EPA. Projects falling under any category specified in Schedule II require the proponent to file an EIA with the provincial agency, which is responsible for its review and accordance of approval or request any additional information deemed necessary.
2.4 Sindh Environmental Protection Act, 2014 52. The following articles of the SEPA 2014 have a direct bearing on the proposed Project:
53. Article 11(1): ‘Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules and regulations therein, no person shall discharge or emit or allow the discharge or emission of any effluent, waste, pollutant, noise or any other matter that may cause or likely cause
Policy and Legal Framework 5 | Page
pollution or adverse environmental effects, as defined in Section 2 of this Act, in an amount, concentration or level which is in excess to that specified in Sindh Environmental Quality Standards.
54. Article 11(2): ‘All persons, in industrial or commercial or other operations, shall ensure compliance with the Environmental Quality Standards for ambient air, drinking water, noise or any other Standards established under section 6(1)(g)(i); shall maintain monitoring records for such compliances; shall make available these records to the authorized person for inspection; and shall report or communicate the record to the Agency as required under any directions issued, notified or required under any rules and regulations.
55. Section 11(3): Monitoring and analysis under sub-section (1) and (2), shall be acceptable only when carried out by the Environmental Laboratory certified by the Agency as prescribed in the rules. All stipulated tests will be regularly performed from designated laboratories approved by Sindh EPA.
56. Article 14 (1): ‘Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules and regulations, no person shall cause any act, deed or any activity’, including; (b) disposal of solid and hazardous wastes at unauthorized places as prescribed; (c) dumping of wastes or hazardous substances into coastal waters and inland water bodies; and (d) release of emissions or discharges from industrial or commercial operations as prescribed.
57. Article 15 (1): ‘Subject to the provisions of this Act, no person shall operate or manufacture a motor vehicle or class of vehicles from which air pollutants or noise are being emitted in an amount, concentration or level which is in excess of the Sindh Environmental Quality Standards or, where applicable, the standards established under sub-clause (i) of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 6’.
58. Article 17(1): ‘No proponent of a project shall commence construction or operation unless he has filed with the Agency an initial environmental examination or environmental impact assessment, and has obtained from the Agency approval in respect thereof.
59. Article 17(2): The agency shall; o a) review the initial environmental examination and accord its approval, subject to such terms and conditions as it may prescribe, or require submission of an environmental impact assessment by the proponent; or o (b) review the environmental impact assessment and accord its approval subject to such terms and conditions as it may deem fit to impose or require that the environmental impact assessment be re-submitted after such modifications as may be stipulated or decline approval of the environmental impact assessment as being contrary to environmental objectives.
60. Article 17(3): ‘Every review of an environment impact assessment shall be carried out with public participation and, subject to the provisions of this Act, after full disclosure of the particulars of the project’.
Policy and Legal Framework 6 | P a g e
61. Article 17(4): ‘The Agency shall communicate its approval or otherwise within a period of two months from the date that the initial environmental examination is filed, and within a period of four months from the date that the environmental impact assessment is filed complete in all respects in accordance with the regulations, failing which the initial environmental examination or, as the case may be, the environmental impact assessment shall be deemed to have been approved, to the extent to which it does not contravene the provisions of this Act and the rules and regulations’.
62. Article 20(1): ‘The Agency shall from time to time require the person in charge of a project to furnish, within such period as may be specified, an environmental audit or environmental review report or environmental management plan containing a comprehensive appraisal of the environmental aspects of the project’.
63. Article 20(2): The report of a project prepared under sub-section (1) shall include: (a) analysis of the predicted qualitative and quantitative impact of the project as compared to the actual impact; (b) evaluation of the efficacy of the preventive, mitigation and compensatory measures taken with respect to the project; and (c) Recommendations for further minimizing or mitigating the adverse environmental impact of the project.
64. Article 20(3): ‘Based on its review of the environmental audit report, the Agency may, after giving the person in charge of the project an opportunity of being heard, direct that specified mitigation and compensatory measures be adopted within a specified time period and may also, where necessary, modify the approval granted by it under section 17’.
65. Section 31(1): The Agency shall cause relevant details of any proposed project regarding which an Environmental Impact Assessment has been received to be published, along with an invitation to the public to furnish their comments thereon within a specified period. (2) In accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed, the Agency shall hold public hearings to receive additional comments and hear oral submissions. (3) All comments received under sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be duly considered by the Agency while reviewing the environmental impact assessment or strategic impact assessment, and decision or action taken thereon shall be communicated to the persons who have furnished the said comments.
2.5 Other National and Sindh Government Laws and Regulations 66. The national laws and regulations are provided in Table 2.1 below.
Policy and Legal Framework 7 | P a g e
Table 2.1: Other National and Sindh Government Laws and Regulations
National and Provincial Brief Description Legislation
Sindh Factories Act 2015 The Sindh Factories Act 2015 deals with regulations related to project area, workers and workplace Environment Health and Safety (EH&S) requirements. The Factories Act also provides regulations for handling and disposal of toxic and hazardous materials. As construction activity is classified as ‘industry’, these regulations will be applicable to the project & construction contractors’ scope of work also. The Protection against It shall be the responsibility of the employer to ensure Harassment of women at the implementation of this Act, including but not limited to incorporate work place Act 2010 the Code of Conduct for protection against harassment at the workplace as a part of their management policy and to form Inquiry Committee referred to in section 3 and designate a competent authority referred to in section 4 of this act. Employment of Child Act 1991 Article 11(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan prohibits employment of children below the age of 14 years in any factory, mines or any other hazardous employment. In accordance with this Article, the Employment of Child Act (ECA) 1991 disallows the child labour in the country. The ECA defines a child to mean a person who has not completed his/her fourteenth year of age. The ECA states that no child shall be employed or permitted to work in any of the occupation set forth in the ECA (such as transport sector, railways, construction, and ports) or in any workshop wherein any of the processes defined in the Act is carried out. The contractor will be bound by this Act to disallow any child labour at the project sites or campsites. Bonded labor system On the commencement of this act, the bonded labor system shall (Abolition) Act 1992 stand abolished and every bonded labourer shall stand freed and discharged from any obligations to render any bonded labor. Sindh Cultural Heritage Act This provincial Act empowers the Government of Sindh to 1994 preserve and protect any premises or objects of archaeological, architectural, historical, cultural, or national interest in Sindh by declaring them protected. Antiquity act 1975 The Antiquities Act relates to the protection, preservation and conservation of archaeological/historical sites and monuments. The Sindh Minimum Wages To provide for the regulation of minimum rates of wages and Act, 2015 various allowances for different categories of workers employed in certain industrial and commercial undertakings and establishments. Workmen’s compensation 1923 The liability of an employer is confined to payment of compensation to a “workman” and then only in respect of an injury caused by “accident arising out of and in the course of his employment”. The liability of employer is limited by ceiling fixed in Schedule to the Act.
Policy and Legal Framework 8 | P a g e
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 This Legislation relates to land acquisition and compensation. The LAA 1894 is, however, is limited to a cash compensation policy for the acquisition of land and built-up property and damage to other owned assets, such as crops, trees and infrastructure. The LAA does not consider the rehabilitation and resettlement of disrupted populations and the restoration of their livelihoods. The Pollution Charge for Related to methods for evaluation and collection of fee for not Industries (calculation and meeting environmental standards. Collection) Rules 2001
The Sindh Forest Act 2012 The law requires review and revision to meet the challenges of management and empower the forest managers to carryout management interventions with full legal support. The new legal instrument should amply address the provision and requirements of UNFCCC, CBD and Convention on Combating Desertification. Legal aspects of carbon sequestration and carbon credit marketing should also be kept in view. The Cutting of Trees It mandates that no person shall, without prior written approval (prohibition) Act, 1992 from authorized officer shall cut, fell or damage trees growing in: First Zone (Area adjacent to and beyond the external frontier of Pakistan to a line at four kilometers measured from the external frontiers of Pakistan) if the number of remaining trees in any field falls short of the number to be calculated at the rate of fifteen trees per acre; and Second Zone (Area adjacent to and beyond the first one extending towards Pakistan to a line at four kilometers measured from the first zone) if the number of remaining trees in any field falls short of the number to be calculated at the rate of ten trees per acre. Sindh Wildlife Protection This ordinance provides for the preservation, protection and Ordinance, 1972 (SWPO) conservation of wildlife by the formation and management of protected areas and prohibition of hunting of wildlife species declared protected under the ordinance. The ordinance also specifies three broad classifications of the protected areas; national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and game reserves. Activities such as hunting and breaking of land for mining are prohibited in national parks, as are removing vegetation or polluting water flowing through the park. Wildlife sanctuaries are areas that have been set aside as undisturbed breeding grounds and cultivation and grazing is prohibited in the demarked areas. Nobody is allowed to reside in a wildlife sanctuary and entrance for the general public is by special dispensation. However, these restrictions may be relaxed for scientific purpose or betterment of the respective area on the discretion of the governing authority in exceptional circumstances. Game reserves are designated as areas where hunting and shooting is not allowed except under special permits.
Policy and Legal Framework 9 | P a g e
Hazardous Substance Rule, These Rules were notified to streamline procedures for issuance 2014 of licenses to industries / businesses that generate hazardous waste, safety precautions for workers and devices them methods for the removal of hazardous wastes in an environmentally friendly manner. The rules also specify procedures to be adopted for import, transport and disposal of hazardous waste; and identify two hundred and forty-three hazardous substances and synthetic chemicals. The rules also specify the requirement of obtaining license from Sindh EPA for the import, transport, storage and disposal of hazardous substances as specified in the rules
2.6 Regulatory Clearances, Sindh EPA 67. In accordance with provincial regulatory requirements, an IEE/EIA satisfying the requirements of the Sindh Environmental Protection Act (2014) is to be submitted to Sindh environmental protection agency (SEPA) for review and approval, and subsequent issuance of NOC before the commencement of construction.
2.7 Guidelines for Environmental Assessment, Pakistan EPA 68. The Pak-EPA has published a set of environmental guidelines for conducting environmental assessments and the environmental management of different types of development projects. The guidelines that are relevant to the proposed project are listed below:
▪ Guidelines for the Preparation and Review of Environmental Reports, Pakistan, EPA1997;
▪ Guidelines for Public Consultations; Pakistan EPA May 1997;
2.8 National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS) 2000 69. The National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS), 2000, specify the following standards:
▪ Maximum allowable concentration of pollutants (32 parameters) in municipal and liquid industrial effluents discharged to inland waters, sewage treatment facilities, and the sea (three separate sets of numbers);
▪ Maximum allowable concentration of pollutants (16 parameters) in gaseous emissions from industrial sources;
▪ Maximum allowable concentration of pollutants (two parameters) in gaseous emissions from vehicle exhaust and noise emission from vehicles;
▪ Maximum allowable noise levels from vehicles;
Policy and Legal Framework 10 | P a g e
70. These standards apply to the gaseous emissions and liquid effluents discharged by batching plants, campsites and construction machinery. The standards for vehicles will apply during the construction as well as operation phase of the project. Standards for ambient air quality have also been prescribed.
2.9 Interaction with Other Agencies 71. The Transport & Mass Transit Department (TMTD), GoS is responsible for ensuring that the project complies with the laws and regulations controlling the environmental concerns of the Staging facility construction and operation and that all preconstruction requisites, such as permits and clearances are met.
2.10 Provincial EPAs 72. TMTD will be responsible for providing the complete environmental documentation required by the SEPA and remain committed to the approved project design. No deviation is permitted during project implementation without prior and explicit permission of the SEPA.
2.11 Provincial Departments of Forests and Wildlife 73. No uprooting or clearing of trees is expected for the proposed project. However, any removed trees or vegetation under private ownership will be compensated as per provision that in case of disruption to vegetation or trees, the project contractor will be responsible for acquiring a 'No-Objection Certificate' (NOC) from the concerned forest department. The application for an NOC will need to be endorsed by the TMTD.
2.12 Provincial Governments 74. The TMTD and its contractors must ensure that the project meets the criteria of provincial/district governments as related to the establishment of construction camps and plants, and the safe disposal of wastewater, solid waste, and toxic materials. TMTD will coordinate and monitor environment related issues.
2.13 ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 75. The ADB’s SPS 2009 requires that environmental considerations be incorporated into ADB funded projects to ensure that the project will have minimal environmental impacts and be environmentally sound. Occupational health & safety of the local population should also be addressed as well as the project workers as stated in SPS. A Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) to receive application and facilitate resolution of affected peoples’ concerns, complaints, and grievances about the project’s environmental performance is also established.
76. All loans and investments are subject to categorization to determine environmental assessment requirements. Categorization is to be undertaken using Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) checklists, consisting of questions relating to (i) the sensitivity and vulnerability of environmental resources in project area, and (ii) the
Policy and Legal Framework 11 | P a g e
potential for the project to cause significant adverse environmental impacts. Projects are classified into one of the following environmental categories:
Category A: A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are irreversible, diverse or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental impact assessment (EIA) is required.
Category B: A proposed project is classified as category B if its potential adverse environmental impacts are less adverse than those of category A projects. These impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for category A projects. An initial environmental examination (IEE) is required.
Category C: A proposed project is classified as category C if it is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. No environmental assessment is required although environmental implications need to be reviewed.
Category FI: A proposed project is classified as category FI if it involves investment of ADB funds to or through a financial intermediary (FI).
2.14 ADB’s Access to Information Policy (AIP) 2018 77. ADB’s new Access to Information Policy (AIP), reflects the ADB’s ongoing commitment to transparency, accountability, and participation by stakeholders. The policy contains principles and exceptions to information sharing with external stakeholders, led by a new overarching principle of “clear, timely, and appropriate disclosure.”
2.15 ADB’s Accountability Mechanism Policy 2012 78. The objectives of the Accountability Mechanism is providing an independent and effective forum for people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects to voice their concerns and seek solutions to their problems, and to request compliance review of the alleged noncompliance by ADB with its operational policies and procedures that may have caused, or is likely to cause, them direct and material harm. The Accountability Mechanism is a “last resort” mechanism.
2.16 Implications of ADB’s safeguard policies on proposed project 79. The objectives of ADB’s safeguards are to:
▪ avoid adverse impacts of projects on the environment and affected people, where possible;
▪ minimize, mitigate, and/or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and affected people when avoidance is not possible; and
▪ help borrowers/clients to strengthen their safeguard systems.
Policy and Legal Framework 12 | P a g e
80. ADB’s SPS sets out the policy objectives, scope and triggers, and principles for three key safeguard areas:
▪ environmental safeguards,
▪ involuntary resettlement safeguards, and
▪ Indigenous Peoples safeguards.
81. The objective of the environmental safeguards is to ensure the environmental soundness and sustainability of projects and to support the integration of environmental considerations into the project decision-making process. ADB’s policy principles are summarized in Table 2.2 below.
Table 2.2: ADB Policy Principles
Policy principle Summary
1 Screening and Screening process initiated early to determine the categorization appropriate extent and type of environmental assessment.
2 Environmental Conduct an environmental assessment to identify assessment potential impacts and risks in the context of the project’s area of influence.
3 Alternatives Examine alternatives to the project’s location, design, technology, and components and their potential environmental and social impacts, including no project alternative.
4 Impact mitigation Avoid, and where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, and/or offset adverse impacts and enhance positive impacts. Prepare an environmental management plan (EMP).
5 Public consultations Carry out meaningful consultation with affected people and facilitate their informed participation. Involve stakeholders early in the project preparation process and ensure that their views and concerns are made known to and understood by decision makers and taken into account. Continue consultations with stakeholders throughout project implementation. Establish a grievance redress mechanism.
6 Disclosure of Disclose a draft environmental assessment in a environmental timely manner, in an accessible place and in a form and language(s) understandable to stakeholders.
Policy and Legal Framework 13 | P a g e
assessment Disclose the final environmental assessment to stakeholders.
7 Environmental Implement the EMP and monitor its effectiveness. management plan Document monitoring results, and disclose monitoring reports.
8 Biodiversity Do not implement project activities in areas of critical habitats.
9 Pollution prevention Apply pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practices. Adopt cleaner production processes and good energy efficiency practices. Avoid pollution, or, when avoidance is not possible, minimize or control the intensity or load of pollutant emissions and discharges. Avoid the use of hazardous materials subject to international bans or phaseouts.
10 Occupational health and Provide workers with safe and healthy working safety conditions and prevent accidents, injuries, and disease. Establish preventive and emergency Community safety. preparedness and response measures to avoid, and where avoidance is not possible, to minimize, adverse impacts and risks to the health and safety of local communities
11 Physical cultural Conserve physical cultural resources and avoid resources destroying or damaging them. Provide for the use of “chance find” procedures.
2.17 Comparison of International and Local Environmental Legislations 82. The ADB SPS requires application of pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practice, as reflected in internationally recognized standards. The SPS states that when host country regulations differ from these standards, the EA will achieve whichever is more stringent.
83. In order to select the most stringent standards applicable, a mix of local (NEQS) and international (IFC) regulations have been selected. The IFC Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines, General EHS Guidelines: Environmental, Noise Management has noise level guidelines for daytime and nighttime, which are applicable. Considering the high baseline noise levels in the project area, it shall be ensured that the increase in noise levels is minimized as far as possible. Also, project related noise levels in the project area are not allowed to increase the existing levels
Policy and Legal Framework 14 | P a g e
by 3 dB or more. Furthermore, it shall be ensured that all necessary noise mitigation measures are implemented to minimize the noise levels in the project area.
84. The Table 2.3 presents IFC workplace noise standards that are applicable to the construction workers. It should also be noted that IFC EHS guidelines advise that where existing ambient noise levels already exceed thresholds, the Project should not result in an increase of more than 3 dB over existing ambient noise at the nearest receptor location off-site.
85. Since measured existing background noise levels along the project alignment in average are 85 dB during the daytime and 79 dB during the nighttime, per IFC guidelines, noise limits could be set at 3 dB above these existing background levels. Therefore, average hourly daytime limit could be 88 dB and nighttime limit could be 82 dB.
86. A comparison of applicable local and international guidelines for ambient air quality has been provided in Table 2.4 below. In the case of most pollutants, the NEQS standards for ambient air quality are more stringent in comparison to USEPA and WHO/IFC standards. The applicable and most stringent parameters for each respective pollutant are highlighted in green.
87. Similar to the standards for air quality, the comparison of noise standards provided in Table 2.5 clearly shows that NEQS standards for noise are more stringent in comparison to the IFC standards. The only exception is the daytime noise level standard for Industrial areas where the IFC standard is more stringent (70 dB(A)) in comparison to NEQS (75 dB(A)) and so for this particular parameter, the IFC standard will be used. Apart from this one exception, the NEQS standards have been used for the proposed BRT project.
88. As far as regulations regarding other environmental parameters are concerned such as acceptable effluent disposal parameters, the local regulations i.e. NEQS take precedence over any other international regulations such as IFC.
Table 2.3: IFC Work Environment Noise limits
Type of Work, workplace IFC General EHS Guidelines
Heavy Industry (no demand for oral communication) 85 Equivalent level Leq,8h
Light industry (decreasing demand for oral 50-65 Equivalent level Leq,8h communication)
Policy and Legal Framework 15 | P a g e
Table 2.4: Comparison of International and local Air Quality Standards*
USEPA WHO/IFC Pak. NEQS Pollutants Avg. Time Standard Avg. Time Standard Avg. Time Standard
3 hrs 0.5 ppm 24 hr 20 ug/m3 Annual Mean 80 ug/m3 SO2 1 hr 75 ppb 10 min 500 ug/m3 24 hrs 120 ug/m3
8 hrs 9 ppm (11 mg/m3) 8 hrs 5 mg/m3 CO - - 35 ppm (43 1 hr 10 mg/m3 1 hr mg/m3)
Annual 100 ug/m3 (53 40 ug/m3 1 yr 40 ug/m3 Annual Mean Mean ppb) NO2 80 ug/m3 1 hr 200 ug/m3 24 hrs 1 hr 100 ppb
8 hrs 100 ug/m3 130 ug/m3 0.07ppm (148 O3 8 hrs 1 hr ug/m3)
Annual Mean 360 ug/m3 TSP - - - - 24 hrs 500 ug/m3
3 3 3 PM10 24 hrs 150 ug/m 1 yr 20 ug/m Annual Mean 120 ug/m
Policy and Legal Framework 16 | Page
24 hr 50 ug/m3 24 hrs 150 ug/m3
Annual Average 15 ug/m3 Annual 15 ug/m3 1 yr 10 ug/m3 Mean 3 PM2.5 24 hrs 35 ug/m 35 ug/m3 24 hr 25 ug/m3 24 hrs 1 hr 15 ug/m3
*: The standards highlighted in green for each respective pollutant are the most stringent based on a comparison between local and international regulations and thus shall be applicable for the proposed project.
* In instances where the airshed is significantly degraded and the pollutant levels are already exceeding the ambient pollutant concentrations provided in the table above, it shall be ensured that the project activities cause as small an increase in pollution levels as feasible, and amounts to a fraction of the applicable short term and annual average air quality guidelines or standards as established in the project specific environmental assessment.
Policy and Legal Framework 17 | P a g e
Table 2.5: Comparison of International and Local Noise Standards
Limit in dB(A) Leq
Category of Area/Zone NEQS WHO/IFC
Day Time Night Time Day Time Night Time
06:00 – 22:00 22:00-06:00 07:00 – 22:00 22:00-07:00
Residential area (A) 55 45 55 45
Commercial area (B) 65 55 70 70
Industrial area (C) 75 65 70 70
Silence zone (D) 50 45 55 45
*: The standards highlighted in green for each respective Area/Zone are the most stringent based on a comparison between local and international regulations and thus shall be applicable for the proposed project.
* In instances where baseline noise levels are already exceeding the standards above, it will need to be ensured that the project activities do not cause an increment of more than 3 dB(A) from the baseline noise levels.
Policy and Legal Framework 18 | Page
3 Description of the Project
3.1 Project Overview 89. The development of a BRT vehicle staging facility under the Karachi Goan Association (KGA) ground, adjacent to Numaish station is being considered with the layouts of the proposed facility provided as Figures 3.1 to 3.3 below. The KGA ground will be reconfigured to house an underground commercial area as well as a staging facility for the BRT network. The total floor area of KGA mezzanine level is 23,520 square meters.
90. The existing structures on the KGA ground will need to be demolished during construction, the concept design proposes to reconstruct the ground and its associated facilities on top of the Mezzanine floor at ground level.
91. The staging facility is proposed to be constructed at the KGA ground, which will be an underground facility consisting of 2 floors having a basement or the underground level which will be used for bus lanes, drivers sitting area, dispatch center and washrooms. The Mezzanine level will be for the commuters and will have the ticketing booths, waiting and commercial areas.
92. It will also provide ease of transfer of passengers from one line to the other and include parking lots for the buses, maintenance of buses, offices, ticketing booth, waiting areas and turnaround facility for the routes that terminate at Numaish.
93. As all BRT corridors converge at Numaish station, this location holds importance in permitting customer interchange between routes. This area also holds importance as a BRT vehicle staging facility for the following reasons:
▪ Since limited space is available along the M. A. Jinnah Road to hold BRT vehicles, in order to cater the difference in demand between peak and off-peak periods, Numaish is an ideal location to stage vehicles and thus optimize operations.
▪ A staging facility at Numaish shall ensure interoperability between all corridors by ensuring physical and operational integration.
▪ A large number of BRT vehicles and people will pass through Numaish station; this gives Numaish an additional significance for potential Transit-Oriented Development (ToD).
94. Commercial activities within the system will not only enhance non-fare revenue, but also provide a sense of security around the station area.
Project Need
95. The staging facility will help in optimizing and adjusting fleet operations as the demand varies along the day. Additionally, it shall provide a turnaround facility for
Description of the Project 19 | Page
routes that terminate at Numaish, and will thus reduce the dead mileage for operations without passengers.
3.2 Justification and Need for Project 96. The staging facility will help in optimizing and adjusting fleet operations as the demand varies along the day. Additionally, it shall provide a turnaround facility for routes that terminate at Numaish, and will thus reduce the dead mileage for operations without passengers.
97. It is important to mention that the Staging Facility shall be a part of the overall Karachi BRT system, which will deliver a sustainable urban transport system that focuses on accessibility and people's mobility needs. The BRT system will aim to organize urban growth and public space along the BRT corridors through integration of land-use and transport planning, improving quality of life, and providing a holistic solution for integrated urban mobility. The purpose of this project is to develop a sustainable urban transport system that delivers fast, affordable, comfortable, safe, and secure services to all.
3.3 Project Construction Schedule 98. The project construction phase is expected to last for a total of 12 months with the activity expected to commence in the third quarter of 2019 and completed by the third quarter of 2020.
3.4 Construction Camps and Work Force 99. The construction activity is expected to span over approximately twelve months. There shall be a number of contracts for a variety of works. The selected Contractor shall have the option to select suitable site(s) located near the project site to establish his labor camps.
100. The work bases shall be setup by the contractor in consultation with the engineering teams. Essential for the work bases is easy approach, availability of a suitable place for temporary storage of material and availability of water for construction in the vicinity. Presence of shade from trees close to the work bases can add to the comfort of the labor while taking rest during the hot season.
101. The location of storage materials and camps will be critical. Since the project contractor(s) will be responsible for identifying the suitable locations for storage and labor camps from the private sector, thus there will need to be clear guidelines for this process, which will need to be closely monitored by the implementing agency. As far as possible, the project design team shall be assigned the task to identify the suitable location(s) for storage of materials since inappropriate storage of materials may result disruption of the traffic movement.
Description of the Project 20 | P a g e
Figure 3.1: Layout of Mezzanine Level of Staging Facility
Description of the Project 21 | Page
Figure 3.2: Layout of Ground Floor of Staging Facility
Description of the Project 22 | Page
Figure 3.3: Detailed Layout of Proposed Staging Facility
Description of the Project 23 | P a g e
3.5 Machinery Requirement 102. For storing materials, stocking equipment and parking machinery and vehicles, the Contractor shall require open and accessible sites close to the labor camps. The Contractor, at his own expense, but keeping in view his contractual obligations to honor the NEQS regarding level of pollution, shall make the arrangements.
Description of the Project 24 | Page
4 Description of Environment
4.1 General 103. The description of various features of the project area environment including the physical, ecological, cultural and socio-economic environmental aspects are presented in the following sub-sections.
4.2 Physical Resources
4.2.1 Meteorological Parameters 104. Karachi is located just above the tropical zone on the coast of the Arabian Sea at 24.9 N latitude and 67.13 E longitude at about 20 m ASL (airport weather station). It is classified as BWh (arid/desert/hot) under the Köppen system. According to Budyko’s criteria, Karachi is characterized by the following parameters:
▪ Radiation index of Dryness: 7.54 ▪ Budyko Evaporation 211 mm/year ▪ Budyko Runoff 1 mm/year ▪ Budyko Evaporation 99.5 % ▪ Budyko Runoff 0.5 %
105. The best estimate of annual rainfall is 212 mm. Net moisture allowance follows the pattern shown in the Figure 4-1 below and as can be seen, precipitation is exceeded by evapotranspiration for every month (arid/desert), hence, it is only during heavy rains that Karachi experiences runoff. Note that these values as well as other data in this section are long term averages compiled by the FAO and available through its “Climate Estimator”1. No particular year is represented in Figure 4-1 below. On the other hand, Figure 4-2 depicts the last 9 years maximum and minimum precipitation at Karachi.
1 The FAO Climate Estimator is a software program and database that provides estimates of average climatic conditions at locations throughout the world. The program can be used to create climatic maps and extract data in various formats for further processing, available at http://www.fao.org/nr/climpag/pub/en3_051002_en.asp. Description of Environment (25)24 July 2019
Figure 4-1: Monthly Average Precipitation (mm) and Evapotranspiration (mm) at Karachi Airport
100 days
75 days
50 days
25 days
0 days
Figure 4-2: Minimum and maximum Precipitation (mm) and Evapotranspiration (mm) at Karachi (2009-2018)
Source: Pakistan Metrological Department
106. The temperature ranges are shown in Figure 4-3 below. Cool weather can prevail during the night from November through March; however, daytime temperatures are generally hot. Temperatures may reach 40°C during May (considered the hottest month), and extreme temperatures of greater than 45°C are not uncommon. No Description of Environment 26 | P a g e
particular year is represented in Figure 4-3 below. On the other hand, the Figure 4-4 depicts the last 9 years maximum, minimum and average temperature of Karachi.
Figure 4-3: Monthly Averages for Mean, Maximum and Minimum Temperatures (Deg-C) at Karachi Airport
Figure 4-4: minimum, maximum and average temperature of Karachi (2009-2018)
Source: Pakistan Metrological Department
107. Despite arid conditions, humidity is relatively high throughout the year. The average annual relative humidity is 75.9% and average monthly relative humidity ranges from
Description of Environment (27)24 July 2019
60% in December to 85% in August (Table 4-1). The Figure 4-5 depicts the last 9 years average cloud and humidity of Karachi.
Table 4-1: Humidity and Dew Point Temperature for Karachi Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Aver Relative Humidity (%) 61 70 77 79 83 83 83 85 84 79 67 60 75.9
Average Dew Point 12.2 15.4 20.2 23.2 26 27.5 26.6 25.7 25 23.5 18.6 13.4 21.5 Temperature °C ( °F) (53.9) (59.8) (68.4) (73.8) (78.8) (81.5) (79.9) (78.3) (77.1) (74.4) (65.6) (56.1) (70.6)
Comfor Comfor Very Severely Severely Severely Very Comfor Very Interpretation Humid M uggy M uggy Humid table table humid high high high humid table humid
Figure 4-5 Average cloud and Humidity of Karachi (2009-2018)
Source: Pakistan Metrological Department
108. Karachi weather is considered pleasant by some due to its breeze from the sea. The wind speed has highest velocities during the summer months, when the direction is south-west to west. The last nine years’ maximum and average wind speeds are given in Figure 4-6 and the Onshore winds from the Arabian Sea contribute to humid conditions, with winds from the west-southwest and southwest being 57% of the time and are depicted in the wind rose in
109.
110.
Description of Environment 28 | P a g e
111. Figure 4-7 below.
Figure 4-6: maximum and average wind speed of Karachi (2009-2018)
Description of Environment (29)24 July 2019
Source: Pakistan Metrological Department
Figure 4-7: Annual Wind Rose for Karachi
4.2.2 Air Quality 112. The main sources of air pollution in Karachi include motor vehicles, uncontrolled waste burning, and industry, including metal working shops, chemical and engineering works, an oil refinery, railroad yards, jute and textile factories, printing and publishing plants, and food processing plants. Re-suspended dust, and small scale unlicensed businesses using ‘dirty fuels’ for manufacturing and production purposes are also contributors.
113. Air pollutant emissions are directly related to fuel consumption. Pakistan’s consumption of petroleum products is growing at 6 per cent annually, of which one- half is consumed by the transport sector. The high content of sulphur in diesel (0.5-1 %) and furnace oil (1-3.5 %) is a major contributor to air pollution. Energy from waste fuels such as waste paper, wood and textile waste contribute a disproportionate load. Industrial emissions are further compounded by the widespread use of small diesel generators in commercial and residential areas in response to the poor reliability of electricity supplies. (Hashmi, et.al 2005)
114. Air pollution from vehicles is severe, with high concentrations gaseous emissions, and fine particulate that cause respiratory problems for an exposed population. The number of diesel trucks and buses has increased. A major share of the emission load from motor vehicles can be attributed to low quality diesel fuel and oil burning two- stroke engines. Description of Environment 30 | P a g e
115. To offset this trend, Karachi has witnessed an increase in vehicles fuelled by compressed natural gas (CNG) in recent years and many formerly diesel fuelled vehicles have been converted to run on CNG. However, there has been a greater increase in traffic overall and Karachi has a preponderance of old buses that run on diesel fuel and produce high emissions. Buses and trucks cause significant air pollution and since the main sources of pollutants are traffic, and traffic has increased on the Red Line corridor, it is assumed that air quality has deteriorated as a result.
116. The main air pollutants in Karachi City are nitrogen oxides (NOX) sulphur dioxide
(SO2) particulate matter (PM10, PM with diameter of 10 microns or smaller and PM2.5, i.e. PM 2.5 microns or smaller) and carbon monoxide (CO). Motor vehicles are the major source of PM pollution. Most of the PM pollution (>80%) comes from diesel-run vehicles. Sindh Environmental Quality Standards (SEQS) for these parameters in
addition to lead (Pb) and ozone (O3) are set by the Government and have been promulgated at provincial level by the Government of Sindh as well as standards for vehicle emissions in line with Euro II. Finally, the Government has promulgated tailpipe emissions standards.
117. The EPA certified and well-reputed laboratory, SUPARCO, was engaged to conduct monitoring for ambient air quality near the proposed project site for the Staging facility development with the results provided as Annexure H.
The location selected for the monitoring activity is shown on the map as Figure 4.8 below.
Description of Environment (31)24 July 2019
Figure 4.8: Monitoring Location for Ambient Air Quality and Noise Levels
Description of Environment 32 | P a g e
118. Detailed 24 hourly ambient air quality monitoring at the proposed project site for the Staging facility has been conducted and the results of this monitoring are provided as Table 4.3 below. Furthermore, a comparison of these monitoring results with the applicable air quality guidelines is also presented in Table 4.4 below. As can be
observed, SO2, PM2.5 and PM10 are already exceeding the permissible limits, which indicates that the airshed is already quite degraded. Thus, all possible efforts will need to be made during the construction phase through adoption of best practices to minimize any further worsening of the pollutant concentrations in the airshed of the project area.
4.2.3 Noise 119. Traffic is a major contributor of noise pollution in all the big cities of the World. Karachi is noted for its high level of noise from improperly maintained vehicles, weak and ineffective noise pollution regulations and lack of enforcement.
120. The results of this monitoring activity are provided in Table 4.2 below. Since the ambient noise levels have been observed to be exceeding the permissible levels, thus it will need to be ensured as part of the mitigation measures that during the construction works, at no time shall the noise levels be permitted to exceed 3 dB from the ambient noise levels.
Table 4.2: Ambient Noise Monitoring Results (24 hrs) at Staging Facility Project Site
Monitoring Location Parameter Noise Reading Results
Day Time Readings (0600 to 2200)
Staging Facility Project Site dB(A) Leq* 76.3
Night Time Readings (2200 to 0600)
Staging Facility Project Site dB(A) Leq* 67.6
Source: SUPARCO Monitoring Report, June 2019 *dB(A) Leq: Time weighted average level of sound in decibel on scale which is relatable to human hearing
4.2.4 Climate Change and Effects 121. Climate change acting hand-in-hand with urban dislocation and growth promises to exert a significant negative impact on Karachi’s urban infrastructure systems and services, its built environment and ecosystem services, and therefore on its urban population and economy. As one of the region’s coastal mega cities, which includes Manila, Bangkok, Jakarta, Mumbai and Shanghai, Karachi will face increased flooding and damage from unpredictable weather patterns along with other forms of extreme event including drought with attendant risks on water supply, heat waves with attendant effect on fuel consumption and water use, sea level rise that impacts mangrove and other ecosystems, flood water removal, and complicity with tropical cyclones. (Anwar 2012)
Description of Environment (33)24 July 2019
122. Another prominent study (Hasan et.al. 2017) maintains that Karachi, being a city of migrants located in the midst of an alien and unwelcoming province, suffers from a disconnect of governance that bodes ill for dealing with the effects of climate change:
“Of the estimated 3.35 million ‘illegal’ immigrants in Pakistan, 75 per cent (or 2.5 million) are settled in more than 100 migrant-concentrated residential areas in Karachi. Living conditions in these settlements are mostly cramped, and services such as clean drinking water, sanitation and solid waste disposal are hard to come by. Research from the region suggests that processes and structures of unplanned rapid urbanisation, environmental change and social exclusion reinforce urban vulnerability for migrants.” (p. 6)
123. The report concludes with recommendations to enhance capacity and political support for institutional reforms, reconstitute the low-cost housing market and support private and public-sector cooperation in health and housing provision, as means for reducing vulnerabilities among the Katchi Abadi population.
Description of Environment 34 | P a g e
Table 4.3: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results (24 hrs) at Staging Facility Proposed Location
NO NO2 CO SO2 O3 PM2.5 PM10 SPM Monitoring Location Parameter (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)
Min 5.6 25.0 2.2 16.0 5.7 Staging Facility Max 19.6 98.0 6.4 30.0 31.5 61.5 133.8 385.6 Project Site Average 11.5 58.5 3.5 24.0 16.7
Source: SUPARCO Monitoring Report, June 2019
Table 4.4: Comparison of ambient air quality results versus applicable Air Quality standards
NO NO2 CO SO2 O3 PM2.5 PM10 SPM Monitoring Location Parameter (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)
Applicable Guideline - 80 - 20 - 25 50 500 (ug/m3) for 24 hrs
Min 5.6 25.0 2.2 16.0 5.7 Staging Facility 61.5 133.8 385.6 Project Site Max 19.6 98.0 6.4 30.0 31.5
Average 11.5 58.5 3.5 24.0 16.7