DOCSLIB.ORG

6 Sanctuary Info

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6 Sanctuary Info THE SANCTUARY Information for teachers When was the Sanctuary built? 1,000 years after the completion of the earthworks at Windmill added to the timber monument of the Sanctuary. Hill, in about 2500BC, a new monument was begun at Overton Hill. Today it is called the Sanctuary. What was the Sanctuary for? How was the Sanctuary constructed? One recent and interesting theory is that stone, because of its durability, represented the dead, the ancestors, and timber which The Sanctuary began as a circle of six concentric settings of grows, matures and decays, represented the living. Perhaps the upright timber posts. Archaeologists have discovered that Sanctuary was originally for the living and its significance changed although the overall shape of the settings did not change over when the stone circles were added. time, the timber posts were frequently replaced over the years. The posts had not rotted away, so it seems likely that removing a The West Kennet Avenue runs between the Sanctuary and post and replacing it with a new one had a symbolic significance. Avebury Henge and was clearly meant to link the two together. This process must have taken a long time – perhaps several The Sanctuary – like Windmill Hill and Avebury Henge, must centuries. have been a focus for meetings, ceremonies or rituals of some kind. The Sanctuary is much smaller than Avebury Henge (the outer circle of stones at the Sanctuary is 40m in diameter, compared to In the 1930s archaeologists found fragments of human bone and the 350m of Avebury’s huge stone circle). the remains of food and pottery, so it looks as though the Sanctuary was a place used for feasts connected with death and At around the same time as the sarsen stones were erected burial. along the West Kennet Avenue, additional stone circles were .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE SANCTUARY from Exploring Avebury: the Essential Guide
    NOTES ON THE SANCTUARY from Exploring Avebury: The Essential Guide www.exploringavebury.com Page 116 - Rediscovering the Sanctuary Maud Cunnington excavated the Sanctuary in 1930 with her husband Ben and a small team of workmen under the direction of Will Young. But first the Sanctuary had to be located. A few years earlier the Cunningtons had excavated Woodhenge, which was discovered from aerial photographs; the Sanctuary though, was not visible from the air and its exact location was unknown. Cunnington wrote that she attempted to find it first by using Stukeley’s 1723 sketch, but “it gave little help.” She eventually followed up Stukeley’s claim that the head of his imagined serpent (the Sanctuary) could be seen from its tail. Stukeley believed that the Beckhampton Avenue had once terminated near a group of round barrows at Fox Covert, three- quarters of a mile west of the Beckhampton roundabout. Stukeley had described this as the “serpent’s tail” terminating “near a fine group of barrows under Cherhill-hill” and claimed that “in this very point only you can see the temple on Overton-hill, on the south side of Silbury-hill.” Cunnington reported: “On going to this spot it was found that a small triangular patch of Mill Field, 2½ miles away, could be seen, and by counting the telegraph poles visible along the roadside, it became easy to define the possible area on which the Sanctuary must have stood.” (“The “Sanctuary” on Overton Hill, near Avebury” by M.E. Cunnington, WAM 45, pp. 300 – 335.) Stukeley and Cunnington both described viewing the Sanctuary from a specific place but neither supplied a map reference for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan 2015 Summary
    Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Vision The Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site is universally important for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites which together form a landscape without parallel. We will work together to care for and safeguard this special area and provide a tranquil, rural and ecologically diverse setting for it and its archaeology. This will allow present and future generations to explore and enjoy the monuments and their landscape setting more fully. We will also ensure that the special qualities of the World Heritage Site are presented, interpreted and enhanced where appropriate, so that visitors, the local community and the whole world can better understand and value the extraordinary achievements © K020791 Historic England © K020791 Historic of the prehistoric people who left us this rich legacy. Avebury Stone Circle We will realise the cultural, scientific and educational potential of the World Heritage Site as well as its social and economic benefits for the community. © N060499 Historic England © N060499 Historic Stonehenge in summer 2 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 World Heritage Sites © K930754 Historic England © K930754 Historic Arable farming in the WHS below the Ridgeway, Avebury The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site is internationally important for its complexes of outstanding prehistoric monuments. Stonehenge is the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world, while Avebury is Stonehenge and Avebury were inscribed as a single World Heritage Site in 1986 for their outstanding prehistoric monuments the largest.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Sims and Fisher
    THE MARRIAGE OF ASTRONOMY AND CULTURE: THEORY AND METHOD IN THE STUDY OF CULTURAL ASTRONOMY A special issue of Culture and Cosmos Vol. 21 no. 1 Spring/Summer 2017 Copyright © 2017 Culture and Cosmos All rights reserved Published by Culture and Cosmos & Sophia Centre Press England www.cultureandcosmos.org In association with the Sophia Centre for the Study of Cosmology in Culture, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Faculty of Humanities and the Performing Arts Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, SA48 7ED, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue card for this book is available from the British Library All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publishers. ISSN 1368-6534 Printed in Great Britain by Lightning Source Through the Gloomy Vale: Underworld Alignments at Stonehenge Lionel Sims and David Fisher Abstract: Three recent independently developed models suggest that some Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments exhibit dual design properties in monument complexes by pairing obverse structures. Parker Pearson’s1 materiality model proposes that monuments of wood are paired with monuments of stone, these material metaphors respectively signifying places of rituals for the living with rituals for the dead. Higginbottom’s2 landscape model suggests that many western Scottish megalithic structures are paired in mirror-image landscape locations in which the horizon distance, direction and height of one site is the topographical reverse of the paired site – all in the service of ritually experiencing the liminal boundaries to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. World Heritage Property Data 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal
    Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 1. World Heritage Property Data Comment ASSUME EH WORLD HERITAGE TEAM WILL CORRECT 1.1 - Name of World Heritage Property THIS SECTION FOR ALL SITES? English Heritage Christopher Young Correct job title - "Head of International Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites Advice" DCMS Francesa Conlon, 4th Floor, 100 Parliament Comment St, London SW1A 2QB + 44 (0) 20 7211 6117 The steering groups for the property are considering whether [email protected] to propose a name change 1.6 - Property Manager / Coordinator, Local Institution / 1.2 - World Heritage Property Details Agency State(s) Party(ies) Sarah Simmonds United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Wiltshire Council Avebury World Heritage Site Coordinator Type of Property Amanda Chadburn cultural English Heritage Identification Number Lead Adviser, Stonehenge 373bis Beth Thomas Year of inscription on the World Heritage List Stonehenge Administration Office 1986 Comment Sarah Simmonds Job title "Avebury World Heritage Site 1.3 - Geographic Information Table Officer" email is: [email protected] ie omit 2 Name Coordinates Property Buffer Total Inscription in email address Amanda Chadburn Job role "Lead Adviser, (longitude / (ha) zone (ha) year Stonehenge" no longer exists. Please delete contact. Beth latitude) (ha) Thomas Job role "Stonehenge World Heritage Site 0 / 0 ? ? ? Coordinator" is missing 0 / 0 ? ? ? Stonehenge and 51.179 / -1.825 2608.2 ? 2608.2 1986 1.7 - Web Address of the Property (if existing) Associated 1. View photos from OUR PLACE the World Heritage Monuments , Wiltshire , England , collection United Kingdom of 2. Stonehenge (English Heritage) Great Britain and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Stonehenge
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NERC Open Research Archive The Age of Stonehenge Mike Parker Pearson1, Ros Cleal2, Josh Pollard3, Colin Richards4, Julian Thomas, Chris Tilley5, Kate Welham6, Andrew Chamberlain, Carolyn Chenery7, Jane Evans, Janet Montgomery8 & Mike Richards9 The date of Stonehenge’s sarsen circle and trilithons has never been satisfactorily established. This detailed re-examination of the monument’s stratigraphy identifies flaws in previous excavators’ interpretations, leading to a revision of the stratigraphic sequence and re-dating of this important phase(Phase 3ii) to 2620-2480 BC. Implications of this include the presence of Beaker pottery in Britain before 2500 BC, the relatively late adoption of an inhumation rite after 2470 BC for the Amesbury Archer and other early Beaker burials, and the possible contemporaneity of Stonehenge Phase 3ii with nearby Durrington Walls. The paper outlines two new initiatives: the Beaker People Project (analysing mobility, migration and diet in the late third millennium BC) and the Stonehenge Riverside Project (summarizing results of new excavations at Durrington Walls). Key words: Stonehenge, Durrington Walls, radiocarbon dating, Beakers Introduction The date of Stonehenge remains a matter of dispute. There is no agreement amongst archaeologists as to whether the sarsen stones were erected as early as 2600-2500 BC (Parker Pearson et al. in press), in the period after 2550 BC (Cleal et al. 1995: 167) or even towards the end of the millennium around 2300 BC or later (Pitts 2000: 144; Case 1997: 164). This is perhaps surprising, given the success of the 1994 dating programme which produced three of the four accepted radiocarbon dates from contexts associated with the erection of the sarsen circle and the trilithons (Phase 3ii; Cleal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Research Agenda for the Avebury World Heritage Site
    This volume draws together contributions from a number of specialists to provide an agenda for future research within the Avebury World Heritage Site. It has been produced in response to the English Heritage initiative for the development of regional and period research frameworks in England and represents the first formal such agenda for a World Heritage Site. Following an introduction setting out the background to, need for and development of the Research Agenda, the volume is presented under a series of major headings. Part 2 is a resource assessment arranged by period from the Lower Palaeolithic to the end of the medieval period (c. AD 1500) together with an assessment of the palaeo-environmental data from the area. Part 3 is the Research Agenda itself, again arranged by period but focusing on a variety of common themes. A series of more over-arching, landscape-based themes for environmental research is also included. In Part 4 strategies for the implementation of the Research Agenda are explored and in Part 5 methods relevant for that implementation are presented. Archaeological Research Agenda for the Avebury World Heritage Site Avebury Archaeological & Historical Research Group (AAHRG) February 2001 Published 2001 by the Trust for Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury SP4 6EB Wessex Archaeology is a Registered Charity No. 287786 on behalf of English Heritage and the Avebury Archaeological & Historical Research Group Copyright © The individual authors and English Heritage all rights reserved British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue entry for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 1–874350–36–1 Produced by Wessex Archaeology Printed by Cromwell Press Ltd, Trowbridge The cost of this publication was met by English Heritage Front Cover: Avebury: stones at sunrise (© English Heritage Photographic Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Avebury, Wiltshire: Archaeology and History (Summary for Visitors Prepared by the Royal Archaeological Institute, 2017)
    Avebury, Wiltshire: archaeology and history (summary for visitors prepared by the Royal Archaeological Institute, 2017) Together with Stonehenge (see separate on-line entry), Avebury and the area around it are part of the World Heritage Site. As well as the henge and the avenues, the West Kennet long barrow, Silbury Hill (see separate on-line entry) and other archaeological monuments are included in the WHS, but substantial areas are privately owned and can only be visited by public paths, such as the track called the Ridgeway across Overton Down; until recently that was thought to have been the only prehistoric north-south route, but has been shown to be no more than one of several tracks that can be identified as a ‘Ridgeway zone’ in the area (Fowler 2000, 254-7). The Avebury part of the World Heritage Site (map from Leivers and Powell 2016, 4, reproduced by courtesy of Wessex Archaeology) Avebury in Prehistory. By Joshua Pollard By the second quarter of the fourth millennium B.C., Neolithic communities were well established in the area around the headwaters of the River Kennet. It is during this period that we witness the beginnings of monument building, and on quite a scale, with the construction of several of the region’s long barrows, including that at West Kennet, and the enclosure on Windmill Hill. The latest fourth and earliest third millennia B.C. may have been a relatively quiet time in terms of monument building within this landscape, but visits to and deposition at early Neolithic Windmill Hill and several of the region’s long barrows occurred, and part of the outer circuit of the Windmill Hill enclosure was re-defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Megaliths: Shifting and Unstable Stones in the Neolithic of the Avebury Landscape
    Making Megaliths: Shifting and Unstable Stones in the Neolithic of the Avebury Landscape Mark Gillings & Joshua Pollard This paper focuses upon the web of practices and transformations bound up in the extraction and movement of megaliths during the Neolithic of southern Britain. The focus is on the Avebury landscape of Wiltshire, where over 700 individual megaliths were employed in the construction of ceremonial and funerary monuments. Locally sourced, little consideration has been given to the process of acquisition and movement of sarsen stones that make up key monuments such as the Avebury henge and its avenues, attention instead focusing on the middle-distance transportation of sarsen out of this region to Stonehenge. Though stone movements were local, we argue they were far from lacking in significance, as indicated by the subsequent monumentalization of at least two locations from which they were likely acquired. We argue that since such stones embodied place(s), their removal, movement and resetting represented a remarkably dynamic and potentially disruptive reconfiguration of the world as it was known. Megaliths were never inert or stable matter, and we need to embrace this in our interpretative accounts if we are to understand the very different types of monument that emerged in prehistory as a result. Introduction The stone employed in those building projects was without exception sarsen, a quartz-cemented siliceous This paper focuses upon the complex web of practices sandstone that occurs as discrete blocks on or close to and processes that were bound up in the extraction the modern ground surface, and which is abundant and movement of megaliths during the Neolithic of in the Upper Kennet Valley where the Avebury com- southern Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Henges and Circles
    Prehistoric Henges and Circles Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which have previously lacked such a published summary, either because the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. This IHA provides an introduction to prehistoric henges and circles. Henges (or henge monuments) are enclosures where, unlike those with a defensive purpose, the ditch lies inside the bank. Timber circles comprise one or more concentric rings of post‑holes marking where wooden posts once stood. Pit circles are similar in present‑day appearance but comprise rings of pits which can be shown by excavation never to have held posts, though they often contain other types of deposit. Stone circles are among the most familiar of prehistoric monuments but also among the least well understood. Descriptions of henges and circles and their development along with a brief chronology are included. A list of in‑depth sources on the topic is suggested for further reading. This document has been prepared by Jonathan Last and edited by Joe Flatman and Pete Herring. It is one of a series of 41 documents. This edition published by Historic England October Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Prehistoric Henges and Circles: Introductions to Heritage Assets. Swindon.
    [Show full text]
  • LONGSTONES COVE and BECKHAMPTON AVENUE Protecting the World Heritage Site
    LONGSTONES COVE AND BECKHAMPTON AVENUE Protecting the World Heritage Site NIO M O UN IM R D These two large standing stones, T IA You are welcome to come into A L P W L O A I R Longstones Field to visit these L D D N known as Adam and Eve, are the only H O E R M I E important monuments but please TA IN G O Location West E M visible remains of Longstones Cove PATRI of present day Kennet treat this sensitive area with respect. United Nations Stonehenge, Avebury The farmer at Manor Farm in and Beckhampton Avenue, a major (GXFDWLRQDO6FLHQWL¿FDQG and Associated Sites Cultural Organization inscribed on the World Avebury village Avenue Avebury Trusloe has protected this Heritage List in 1986 ceremonial avenue of standing stones important archaeological site by which led from the henge at Avebury. Avebury henge and stone circles removing the area from ploughing as part of an Environmental Stewardship scheme. In the centuries around 2,500 BC, late Neolithic farmers transformed the Avebury The grassland around the monuments is sown with a special landscape, leaving a monumental legacy you William Stukeley 1743 Three intact stones were found buried, as well as five burning mix of native chalk grassland can still see today. wildflowers which provides a source William Stukeley’s field notes and Location of present day pits where stones had been of nectar for butterflies and a habitat Using antler picks and stone tools they dug the drawings published in 1743 show Avebury Trusloe destroyed and one pit where for invertebrates and farmland birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Avebury Resource Assessment
    Page left blank intentionally A Research Framework for the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Avebury Resource Assessment compiled and edited by Matt Leivers and Andrew B. Powell A Research Framework for the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Avebury Resource Assessment compiled and edited by Matt Leivers and Andrew B. Powell with contributions by by Martyn Barber, Mark Bowden, Rosamund J. Cleal, Nikki Cook, Mark Corney, Paul Cripps, Andrew David, Bob Davis, David Dawson, Bruce Eagles, Jane Ellis-Schön, A. P. Fitzpatrick, Abigail George, Frances Healy, Katie Hinds, David Hinton, Ronald Hutton, Mandy Jay, Matt Leivers, Michael Lewis, Rebecca Montague, Janet Montgomery, David Mullin, Joshua Pollard, Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger, Andrew B. Powell, Andrew Reynolds, Clive Ruggles, Julie Scott-Jackson, Sarah Simmonds, Nicola Snashall, Chris J. Stevens, Anne Upson, Bryn Walters and Sarah F. Wyles Illustrations by Rob Goller Wessex Archaeology Monograph 38 2016 Published 2016 by Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, SP4 6EB www.wessexarch.co.uk Copyright © 2016 Wessex Archaeology Ltd All rights reserved British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-874350-98-9 Designed and typeset by Kenneth Lymer Cover design by Kenneth Lymer Copy-editing by Philippa Bradley Printed by Cambrian Printers Front cover Avebury – the Z stones in the southern Inner Circle (Steve Marshall) Back cover Upper – looking west from the Sanctuary on Overton Hill towards the West Kennet Long Barrow and the southern part of the World Heritage Site (Erica Gittins) Middle – the West Kennet Avenue (Steve Marshall) Bottom – the Valley of Stones in Clatford Bottom (Steve Marshall) Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a company limited by guarantee registered in England, company number 1712772.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Avebury: Stone Circles and Nearby Sites
    24 2.4 Avebury: stone circles and nearby sites N E W S Beckhampton Avenue The bank originally The ditch was The outer circle The two inner circles stood 7 m (23 ft) high, originally 9 m (30 ft) consisted of 100 house ‘The Cove’ much taller than today. deep and 20 m (65 ft) stones, of which 27 (north-east) and ‘The wide. still stand. Obelisk’ (south-east). West Kennet Avenue, leading to Artist’s impression of the stone circles when first erected The Sanctuary on Overton Hill Avebury is only 2.5 km (1.6 mi) from Overton Hill, and packed with interest – mainly prehistoric but also more recent. Allow at least half a day to visit it, longer if possible, and ideally aim to overnight there or nearby. It is a place of great beauty and tranquillity, especially at dawn and dusk. Avebury has the largest stone circle in the world – about 16 times the size of its more famous cousin, Stonehenge. Unlike the latter, Avebury is a true henge – its stones are encircled by a massive ditch with an outer bank beyond. Jointly with Stonehenge and other local antiquities, it was recognised as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1986. Overview Britain’s Neolithic period (New Stone Age) started 6000 years ago when primitive tribes made the transition from hunting and gathering to settlement and agriculture. This led to faster population growth, and also to more organised forms of society. Wielding merely tools that they created from animal bones, antlers, timber and flint, these people built vast monuments – especially across south-west Britain.
    [Show full text]