DOCSLIB.ORG

Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015 Statistical Thermodynamics Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015 Solution Exercise 11 Problem 1: Ideal chain models a) The end-to-end vector of a polymer chain is defined as n ~ X Rn = ~ri : (1.1) i=1 Since there are no correlations between the individual ~ri all chain orientations will be equally likely. The mean end-to-end vector is therefore equal to zero. ~ hRni = 0 : (1.2) the mean-square end-to-end distance, however, provides a more useful description of the system. With *0 n 1 0 n 1+ 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ X X hR i = hRni = hRn · Rni = @ ~riA · @ ~rjA ; (1.3) i=1 j=1 and with the hint given one gets n n 2 2 X X hR i = l hcos θiji : (1.4) i=1 j=1 Again we use the assumption that there are no correlations between the orientations of the bond vectors. For all i 6= j this will lead to hcos θiji = 0, however for i = j (one and the same bond) θii will always be equal to 0° which leads to hcos θiii = 1. With this Eq. (1.4) then simplifies to hR2i = nl2 : (1.5) b) When considering correlations between the individual bond vectors the hcos θiji are not necessarily equal to zero or one anymore. In general one might assume, however, that for bonds that are infinitely far apart from each other there won't be any correlations, i.e lim hcos θiji = 0 : (1.6) ji−jj!1 Without any further knowledge about the polymer we cannot write an analytic expression for the mean-square end-to-end distance apart from the most general form in which the correlations between the ith element and all the other elements in the chains is denoted as n 0 X Ci ≡ hcos θiji : (1.7) j=1 With these considerations Eq. (1.4) reduces to n n n 2 2 X X 2 X 0 2 hR i = l hcos θiji = l Ci = Cnnl ; (1.8) i=1 j=1 i=1 page 1 of 6 Statistical Thermodynamics Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015 where the Flory's characteristic ratio Cn is the average correlation over all bonds n 1 X C = C0 (1.9) n n i i=1 It is interesting to note that for all polymers Cn > 1 and as n ! 1 Cn approaches a finite value C1. For long polymers Eq. (1.8) can then be rewritten as 2 ∼ 2 hR i = C1nl : (1.10) c) Neglecting some exceptions such as polyethylene (C1 = 7:4) a more sterically hindered polymer has a larger C1. Polypropylene has a characteristic ratio at infinite chain length of C1 = 5:9, whereas for polystyrene C1 = 9:5. Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook, James E. Mark, 2007, p.445-452 is a good refer- ence. d) Polypropylene has a repeat unit of (C3H6). One repeat unit therefore has a molar mass −1 of M(C3H6) = 42:08 g mol . Since we are interested in the number of backbone bonds n, we will have to find the average molar mass of the repeat unit per backbone bond. In polypropylene there are two backbone bonds. Therefore, we get an average molar mass per −1 backbone bond of Mb = 21:04 g mol . From this it follows that the chain consists of 107 g mol−1 n = = 48 · 104 (1.11) 21:04 g mol−1 backbone bonds. The bond length can be assumed to be l = 1:54 A. The mean-square end-to-end distance therefore is 2 hR2i = 5:9 · 48 · 104 · (1:54 A) 2 = 6 720 000 A : (1.12) This corresponds to a root-mean-square end-to-end distance of p 2 Rrms = hR i = 2600 A ≈ 0:3 µm (1.13) e) From Eq. (8.44) in the lecture script we get an expression for the Kuhn length b hR2i C nl2 b = = 1 : (1.14) Rmax Rmax For a chain in the all-trans conformation (see Fig. (1-3) on the exercise sheet) Rmax = nl cos (θ=2) : (1.15) Eq. (1.14) can then be simplified to C nl2 C l b = 1 = 1 : (1.16) nl cos (θ=2) cos (θ=2) Inserting the bond angle θ = 68°, the characteristic ratio C1 = 5:9 and the bond length l = 1:54 A one gets 5:9 · 1:54 A b = = 11 A: (1.17) cos (34°) page 2 of 6 Statistical Thermodynamics Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015 The length of the Kuhn monomer is therefore roughly 11 A. This is larger than the size of a single repeat unit of the polymer. To get a feeling of how many repeat units are within a Kuhn monomer one could derive an expression for the ratio of the backbone bonds n to Kuhn monomers N. Also from the lecture script (Eq. (8.43)) and with Eq. (1.15) of this solution we get 2 2 2 2 2 Rmax n l cos (θ=2) n cos (θ=2) N = 2 = 2 = : (1.18) C1nl C1nl C1 This gives a ratio of n C C 5:9 = 1 = 1 = = 8:6 : (1.19) N cos2 (θ=2) cos2 (34°) 0:6873 Since there are 2 backbone bonds in each repeat unit, there are roughly 4 repeat units in each Kuhn monomer! Using the same considerations as above, one has to consider the average molar mass per backbone bond Mb of the original polymer to get to the molar mass of one Kuhn monomer. −1 The molar mass of a repeat unit in polypropylene is M(CH2CH(CH3)) = 42:08 g mol . Since there are two backbone bonds per repeat unit, the average molar mass per backbone −1 bond Mb is equal to 21:04 g mol . Since the total mass of the polymer has to be conserved Mpolymer = NM0 = nMb : (1.20) Therefore n M = M = 8:6 · 21:04 g mol−1 = 181 g mol−1 : (1.21) 0 N b The molecular weight can then be calculated by deviding by Avogadro's constant NA. In the equivalent freely rotating chain model chemical information is contained within the Kuhn monomer size, making a comparison between polymers easy. f) By using Eq. (8.34) from the lecture script and Eq. (1.3) from the exercise sheet one gets n n n 0 i−1 n 1 2 X X X X 2 X hR i = h~ri · ~rji = @ h~ri · ~rji + h~ri i + h~ri · ~rjiA i=1 j=1 i=1 j=1 j=i+1 n n 0 i−1 n 1 X 2 2 X X i−j X j−i = h~ri i + l @ (cos θ) + (cos θ) A (1.22) i=1 i=1 j=1 j=i+1 n 0 i−1 n−i 1 2 2 X X k X k = nl + l @ cos θ + cos θA : i=1 k=1 k=1 In the first line of the expression we made a simple expansion of the sum over j. This enables us to get all terms of i = j out of the summation. From line two to line three a change in variables was undertaken. The new variable of summation k = jj − ij gives the distance in linking units from the position at which i = j. With Eq. (1.4) of the exercise sheet we are able write the summation over k as an infinite sum. We are making use of the fact, that cos θjj−ij is a rapidly decaying function. n 1 1 X X X hR2i = nl2 + 2l2 cosk θ = nl2 + 2nl2 cosk θ : (1.23) i=1 k=1 k=1 page 3 of 6 Statistical Thermodynamics Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015 After factorizing out one cos θ, 1 X hR2i = nl2 + 2nl2 cos θ cosk θ (1.24) k=0 Eq. (1.23) can be rewritten using the following relation 1 = 1 + x + x2 + x3 + ::: ; (1.25) 1 − x as cos θ 1 + cos θ hR2i = nl2 + 2nl2 = nl2 . Q.E.D. (1.26) 1 − cos θ 1 − cos θ When comparing Eq. (1.26) with Eq. (1.10) one also gets 1 + cos θ C = : (1.27) 1 1 − cos θ g) For a chain with a bond angle of θ = 68° C1 ≈ 2 : (1.28) When comparing this value to the characteristic ratio C1 of real polymers one sees, that the correlations are underestimated by a factor of 2 to 5. Better agreements are achieved when taking hindrance of the bond torsion into account. h) When using the series expansion for cos θ at small angles θ2 cos θ ∼= 1 − ; (1.29) 2 and a series expansion ln(1 − x) ∼= −x + ::: (1.30) the persistence segment sp can be approximated as ∼ 1 ∼ 2 sp = − = : (1.31) θ2 θ2 ln 1 − 2 The Flory characteristic ratio (Eq. (1.8)) might similarly be rewritten in the limit of a worm-like chain as 2 2 − θ 1 + cos θ ∼ 2 ∼ 4 C1 = = = : (1.32) 1 − cos θ θ2 θ2 2 The expression for the Kuhn length b in Eq. (1.16) then gives C 4 b = l 1 ∼= l = 2l ; (1.33) cos (θ=2) θ2 p when using the hint given that the persistence length lp is lp = spl : (1.34) page 4 of 6 Statistical Thermodynamics Solution Exercise 11 HS 2015 i) In the limit of Rmax lmax Eq. (1.6) on the exercise sheet simplifies to 2 hR i ≈ 2lpRmax = bRmax ; (1.35) which corresponds to the ideal chain limit. For Rmax lp we get 2 2 hR i = Rmax ; (1.36) where we used the series expansion 1 exp(−x) ∼= 1 − x + x2 + ::: ; (1.37) 2 with ! R x = max : (1.38) lp This essentially corresponds to a rod-like behaviour of the polymer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ideal Chain Conformations and Statistics
    ENAS 606 : Polymer Physics Chinedum Osuji 01.24.2013:HO2 Ideal Chain Conformations and Statistics 1 Overview Consideration of the structure of macromolecules starts with a look at the details of chain level chemical details which can impact the conformations adopted by the polymer. In the case of saturated carbon ◦ backbones, while maintaining the desired Ci−1 − Ci − Ci+1 bond angle of 112 , the placement of the final carbon in the triad above can occur at any point along the circumference of a circle, defining a torsion angle '. We can readily recognize the energetic differences as a function this angle, U(') such that there are 3 minima - a deep minimum corresponding the the trans state, for which ' = 0 and energetically equivalent gauche− and gauche+ states at ' = ±120 degrees, as shown in Fig 1. Figure 1: Trans, gauche- and gauche+ configurations, and their energetic sates 1.1 Static Flexibility The static flexibility of the chain in equilibrium is determined by the difference between the levels of the energy minima corresponding the gauche and trans states, ∆. If ∆ < kT , the g+, g− and t states occur with similar probability, and so the chain can change direction and appears as a random coil. If ∆ takes on a larger value, then the t conformations will be enriched, so the chain will be rigid locally, but on larger length scales, the eventual occurrence of g+ and g− conformations imparts a random conformation. Overall, if we ignore details on some length scale smaller than lp, the persistence length, the polymer appears as a continuous flexible chain where 1 lp = l0 exp(∆/kT ) (1) where l0 is something like a monomer length.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Two-Dimensional Polymers
    Macromolecules 1982,15, 549-553 549 The squared frequencies uA2are obtained from the ei- (4) Flory, P. J. "Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules"; In- genvalues Of this matrix described in the text* terscience: New York, 1969; p 315. (5) Volkenstein,M. V. &Configurational Statistics of polymeric for N = 3 and 4 will be found in ref 7. Chains" (translated from the Russian edition by S. N. Ti- masheff and M. J. Timasheff);Interscience: New York, 1963; References and Notes p 450. (1) Weiner, J. H.; Perchak, D. Macromolecules 1981, 14, 1590. (6) Frenkel, J. "Kinetic Theory of Liquids"; Oxford University (2) Weiner, J. H., Macromolecules, preceding paper in this issue. Press: London, 1946, Dover reprint, 1955; pp 474-476. (3) G6, N.; Scheraga, H. A. Macromolecules 1976, 9, 535. (7) Perchak, D. Doctoral Dissertation, Brown University, 1981. Properties of Two-Dimensional Polymers Jan Tobochnik and Itzhak Webman* Department of Mathematics, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 Joel L. Lebowitzt Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 M. H. Kalos Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York university, New York, New York 10012. Received August 3, 1981 ABSTRACT: We have performed a series of Monte Carlo simulations for a two-dimensional polymer chain with monomers interacting via a Lennard-Jones potential. An analysis of a mean field theory, based on approximating the free energy as the sum of an elastic part and a fluid part, shows that in two dimensions there is a sharp collapse transition, at T = 0, but that there is no ideal or quasi-ideal behavior at the transition as there is in three dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Polymer Dynamics
    Polymer Dynamics 2017 School on Soft Matters and Biophysics Instructor: Alexei P. Sokolov, e-mail: [email protected] Text: Instructor's notes with supplemental reading from current texts and journal articles. Please, have the notes printed out before each lecture. Books (optional): M.Doi, S.F.Edwards, “The Theory of Polymer Dynamics”. Y.Grosberg, A.Khokhlov, “Statistical Physics of Macromolecules”. J.Higgins, H.Benoit, “Polymers and Neutron Scattering”. 1 Course Content: I. Introduction II. Experimental methods for analysis of molecular motions III. Vibrations IV. Fast and Secondary Relaxations V. Segmental Dynamics and Glass Transition VI. Chain Dynamics and Viscoelastic Properties VII. Rubber Elasticity VIII. Concluding Remarks 2 INTRODUCTION Polymers are actively used in many technologies Traditional technologies: Even better perspectives for use in novel technologies: Example: Light-weight materials Boeing-787 “Dreamliner” 80% by volume is plastic Materials for energy generation Example: polymer solar cells Materials for energy storage Example: Polymer-based Li battery Polymers have huge potential for applications in Bio-medical field “Smart” materials, stimuli-responsive, self-healing … 3 Polymers Polymers are long molecules They are constructed by covalently bonded structural units – monomers Main difference between properties of small molecules and polymers is related to the chain connectivity Advantages of Polymeric Based Materials: Easy processing, relatively cheap manufacturing Light weight (contain mostly light elements like C, H, O) Unique viscoelastic properties (e.g. rubber elasticity) Extremely broad tunability of macroscopic properties 4 Definitions o Monomer – repeat unit, structural block of the polymer chain o Oligomer – short chains, ~ 3-10 monomers o Polymers – long chains, usually hundreds of monomers o Degree of polymerization – number of monomers in the polymer chain Molecular weight: Weight of the molecule M [g/mol].
    [Show full text]
  • Biodegradable Polymeric Biomaterials in Different Forms for Long-Acting
    University of Tennessee Health Science Center UTHSC Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations (ETD) College of Graduate Health Sciences 5-2017 Biodegradable Polymeric Biomaterials in Different Forms for Long-acting Contraception and Drug Delivery to the Eye and Brain Dileep Reddy Janagam University of Tennessee Health Science Center Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations Part of the Pharmaceutics and Drug Design Commons Recommended Citation Janagam, Dileep Reddy (http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-7709), "Biodegradable Polymeric Biomaterials in Different Forms for Long-acting Contraception and Drug Delivery to the Eye and Brain" (2017). Theses and Dissertations (ETD). Paper 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2017.0429. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Graduate Health Sciences at UTHSC Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (ETD) by an authorized administrator of UTHSC Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biodegradable Polymeric Biomaterials in Different Forms for Long-acting Contraception and Drug Delivery to the Eye and Brain Document Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program Pharmaceutical Sciences Track Pharmaceutics Research Advisor Tao L. Lowe, Ph.D. Committee Joel Bumgardner, Ph.D. James R. Johnson, Ph.D. Bernd Meibohm, Ph.D. Duane D. Miller, Ph.D. ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-7709 DOI 10.21007/etd.cghs.2017.0429 Comments Two year embargo expires
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Structure and Properties of Engineering Polymers
    Structure and Properties of Engineering Polymers Lecture: Microstructures in Polymers Nikolai V. Priezjev Textbook: Plastics: Materials and Processing (Third Edition), by A. Brent Young (Pearson, NJ, 2006). Microstructures in Polymers • Gas, liquid, and solid phases, crystalline vs. amorphous structure, viscosity • Thermal expansion and heat distortion temperature • Glass transition temperature, melting temperature, crystallization • Polymer degradation, aging phenomena • Molecular weight distribution, polydispersity index, degree of polymerization • Effects of molecular weight, dispersity, branching on mechanical properties • Melt index, shape (steric) effects Reading: Chapter 3 of Plastics: Materials and Processing by A. Brent Strong https://www.slideshare.net/NikolaiPriezjev Gas, Liquid and Solid Phases At room temperature Increasing density Solid or liquid? Pitch Drop Experiment Pitch (derivative of tar) at room T feels like solid and can be shattered by a hammer. But, the longest experiment shows that it flows! In 1927, Professor Parnell at UQ heated a sample of pitch and poured it into a glass funnel with a sealed stem. Three years were allowed for the pitch to settle, and in 1930 the sealed stem was cut. From that date on the pitch has slowly dripped out of the funnel, with seven drops falling between 1930 and 1988, at an average of one drop every eight years. However, the eight drop in 2000 and the ninth drop in 2014 both took about 13 years to fall. It turns out to be about 100 billion times more viscous than water! Pitch, before and after being hit with a hammer. http://smp.uq.edu.au/content/pitch-drop-experiment Liquid phases: polymer melt vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Semi-Empirical Equation of State for Square-Well Chain Fluid Based on the Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (SAFT)
    Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(1), 52-57 (2000) Development of the Semi-empirical Equation of State for Square-well Chain Fluid Based on the Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (SAFT) Min Sun Yeom, Jaeeon Chang and Hwayong Kim† School of Chemical Engineering, Seoul National University, Shinlim-dong, Kwanak-ku, Seoul 151-742, Korea (Received 25 August 1999 • accepted 29 October 1999) Abstract−A semi-empirical equation of state for the freely jointed square-well chain fluid is developed. This equation of state is based on Wertheim's thermodynamic perturbation theory (TPT) and the statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT). The compressibility factor and radial distribution function of square-well monomer are ob- tained from Monte Carlo simulations. These results are correlated using density expansion. In developing the equa- tion of state the exact analytical expressions are adopted for the second and third virial coefficients for the com- pressibility factor and the first two terms of the radial distribution function, while the higher order coefficients are determined from regression using the simulation data. In the limit of infinite temperature, the present equation of state and the expression for the radial distribution function are represented by the Carnahan-Starling equation of state. This semi-empirical equation of state gives at least comparable accuracy with other empirical equation of state for the square-well monomer fluid. With the new SAFT equation of state from the accurate expressions for the mo- nomer reference and covalent terms, we compare the prediction of the equation of state to the simulation results for the compressibility factor and radial distribution function of the square-well monomer and chain fluids.
    [Show full text]
  • High Elasticity of Polymer Networks. Polymer Networks
    High Elasticity of Polymer Networks. Polymer Networks. Polymer network consists of long polymer chains which are crosslinked with each other to form a giant three-dimensional macromolecule. All polymer networks except those who are in the glassy or partially crystalline states exhibit the property of high elasticity, i.e., the ability to undergo large reversible deformations at relatively small applied stress. High elasticity is the most specific property of polymer materials, it is connected with the most fundamental features of ideal chains considered in the previous lecture. In everyday life, highly elastic polymer materials are called rubbers. Molecular Nature of the High Elasticity. Elastic response of the crystalline solids is due to the change of the equilibrium interatomic distances under stress and therefore, the change in the internal energy of the crystal. Elasticity of rubbers is composed from the elastic responses of the chains crosslinked in the network sample. External stress changes the equilibrium end-to-end distance of a chain, and it thus adopts a less probable conformation. Therefore, the elasticity of rubbers is of purely entropic nature. Typical Stress-Strain Curves. for steel for rubbers А - the upper limit for stress-strain linearity, В - the upper limit for the reversibility of deformations, С - the fracture point. - the typical values of deformations ∆ l l are much larger for rubber; - the typical values of strain σ are much larger for steel; - the typical values of the Young modulus is enormously larger for steel than for rubber ( E 1 0 1 1 Pa and 1 0 5 − 1 0 6 Pa, respectively); - for steel linearity and reversibility are lost practically simultaneously, while for rubbers there is a very wide region of nonlinear reversible deformations; - for steel there is a wide region of plastic deformations (between points B and C) which is all but absent for rubbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Polymer Physics Lecture 1 Boulder Summer School July – August 3, 2012
    Introduction to polymer physics Lecture 1 Boulder Summer School July – August 3, 2012 A.Grosberg New York University Lecture 1: Ideal chains • Course outline: • This lecture outline: •Ideal chains (Grosberg) • Polymers and their •Real chains (Rubinstein) uses • Solutions (Rubinstein) •Scales •Methods (Grosberg) • Architecture • Closely connected: •Polymer size and interactions (Pincus), polyelectrolytes fractality (Rubinstein) , networks • Entropic elasticity (Rabin) , biopolymers •Elasticity at high (Grosberg), semiflexible forces polymers (MacKintosh) • Limits of ideal chain Polymer molecule is a chain: Examples: polyethylene (a), polysterene •Polymericfrom Greek poly- (b), polyvinyl chloride (c)… merēs having many parts; First Known Use: 1866 (Merriam-Webster); • Polymer molecule consists of many elementary units, called monomers; • Monomers – structural units connected by covalent bonds to form polymer; • N number of monomers in a …and DNA polymer, degree of polymerization; •M=N*mmonomer molecular mass. Another view: Scales: •kBT=4.1 pN*nm at • Monomer size b~Å; room temperature • Monomer mass m – (240C) from 14 to ca 1000; • Breaking covalent • Polymerization bond: ~10000 K; degree N~10 to 109; bondsbonds areare NOTNOT inin • Contour length equilibrium.equilibrium. L~10 nm to 1 m. • “Bending” and non- covalent bonds compete with kBT Polymers in materials science (e.g., alkane hydrocarbons –(CH2)-) # C 1-5 6-15 16-25 20-50 1000 or atoms more @ 25oC Gas Low Very Soft solid Tough and 1 viscosity viscous solid atm liquid liquid Uses Gaseous
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture1541230922.Pdf
    MODULE-1 Introduction: -The macromolecules are divided between biological and non-biological materials. The biological polymers form the very foundation of life and intelligence, and provide much of the food on which man exists. The non-biological polymers are primarily the synthetic materials used for plastics, fibers and elastomers but a few naturally occurring polymers such as rubber wool and cellulose are included in this class. Today these substances are truly indispensable to mankind because these are essential to his clothing,shelter, transportation, communication as well as the conveniences of modern living. Polymer Biological Non- biological Proteins, starch, wool plastics, fibers easterners Note: Polymer is not said to be as macromolecule, because polymer is composedof repeating units whereas the macromolecules may not be composed of repeating units. Definition: A polymer is a large molecule built up by the repetition of small, simple chemical units known as repeating units which are held together by chemical covalent bonds. These repeating units are called monomer Polymer – ---- poly + meres Many parts In some cases, the repetition is linear but in other cases the chains are branched on interconnected to form three dimensional networks. The repeating units of the polymer are usually equivalent on nearly equivalent to the monomer on the starting material from which the polymer is formed. A higher polymer is one in which the number of repeating units is in excess of about 1000 Degree of polymerization (DP): - The no of repeating units or monomer units in the chain of a polymer is called degree of polymerization (DP) . The molecular weight of an addition polymer is the product of the molecular weight of the repeating unit and the degree of polymerization (DP).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry C3102-2005: Polymers Section
    Chemistry C3102-2005: Polymers Section Dr. Edie Sevick, Research School of Chemistry, ANU 2.0 Thermodynamics of an Ideal Chain: Stretching and Squashing In this section, we begin to investigate the thermodynamics of polymers, starting first, with an isolated ideal chain. We begin with the general relation ∆F = ∆U T ∆S (1) − where the first term on the RHS is the change in the free energy, ∆U is the change in the internal energy of the chain, and ∆S is the change in entropy. Examples of interactions which contribute to ∆U range from Lennard-Jones interactions to complex interactions which scientists might arbitrarily propose, all of which are of the form U = f(rij) where rij is a vector of distances between monomers, solvent, or other particle or surface which might be included in the system. By definition, an ideal chain suffers NO interactions and contributes nothing to the internal energy. Consequently, if we take an ideal chain and end-tether it to a phantom wall, or change the solvent, then the change in the internal energy of the system is 0. On the other hand, the chain has considerable disorder, measured by the number of configurations that it can adopt and quantified by the thermodynamic quantity entropy. If we were to hold the two ends of the chain a distance Na apart so that the chain was taut, we would considerably decrease the number of configurations that the chain could adopt. If S1 is the entropy of the ideal chain in its relaxed, or natural state, and S2 the entropy of the chain in its taut state, then S1 >> S2 or ∆S = S2 S1 would be negative, and by the above equation, ∆F , would be positive.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiment 26E LINEAR and CROSSLINKED POLYMERS
    Experiment 26E FV-4-13-09 LINEAR AND CROSSLINKED POLYMERS MATERIALS: Resorcinol, 3 M NaOH, formalin, phthalic anhydride, anhydrous sodium acetate, ethylene glycol, glycerol, corn starch, Nylon 6,10 demo, ring stand, Bunsen burner or hot plate, 2 clamps, test tube (20 x 150 mm), 2 test tubes (16 x 125 mm), applicator sticks, weighing boat, polyvinyl alcohol solution, sodium borate solution, stirring rod, 20 mL graduated cylinder, 10 mL graduated cylinder, 2 beakers, 2 plastic beakers, thermometer. PURPOSE: The purpose of this experiment is to study the properties of polymers. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: By the end of this experiment, the student should be able to demonstrate the following proficiencies: 1. Understand the differences between linear and crosslinked polymers. 2. Compare and contrast the properties of polyester fibers. 3. Define the following terms: polymer, monomer, repeat unit, crosslinking, biopolymer. PRE-LAB: Complete the Pre-lab assignment before lab. DISCUSSION: Polymers are extremely large molecules (molar masses from 1000 to greater than 106 g/mole) which result from chemically linking thousands of relatively small molecules called monomers. Dramatic changes in physical properties accompany this process. Monomers, due to their weak intermolecular forces, are either gases, liquids or structurally weak molecular solids. In a polymerization reaction, these are joined together to form larger molecules. As the intermolecular forces between the molecules increase, the mixture becomes more viscous. Eventually the molecules become so large that their chains become entangled. It is this entanglement of the individual polymer chains that gives polymeric materials their characteristic properties. A classic example of the changes accompanying polymerization is given by the conversion of ethylene to polyethylene (PE).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter #2 Thermodynamics of an Ideal Chain
    Chemistry C3102-2006: Polymers Section Dr. Edie Sevick, Research School of Chemistry, ANU 2.0 Thermodynamics of an Ideal Chain: Stretching and Squashing In this section, we begin to investigate the thermodynamics of polymers, starting first, with an isolated ideal chain. We begin with the Helmholtz free energy, F , which corresponds to the available work at a constant temperature: ∆F = ∆U T ∆S, (1) − where U is the internal energy of the chain, T is the temperature which is held constant and S is the entropy. Examples of energies which contribute to U range from Lennard-Jones interactions to complex interactions which scientists might propose, all of which are of the form U = f(rij) where rij is a vector of distances between monomers, solvent, or other particle or surface which might be included in the system. By definition, an ideal chain suffers NO interactions and contributes nothing to the internal energy at a constant temperature. Consequently, if we take an ideal chain and end-tether it to a phantom wall, or change the solvent, then the change in the internal energy of the system is 0 under isothermal conditions: ∆U = 0 1. On the other hand, the chain has considerable disorder, measured by the number of configurations that it can adopt and quantified by the thermodynamic quantity entropy. If we were to hold the two ends of the chain a distance Na apart so that the chain was taut, we would considerably decrease the number of configurations that the chain could adopt. If S1 is the entropy of the ideal chain in its relaxed, or natural state, and S2 the entropy of the chain in its taut state, then S1 >> S2 or ∆S = S2 S1 would be negative, and by the above equation, ∆F , would be − positive.
    [Show full text]