DOCSLIB.ORG

V. M. Seiders U.S. Geological Survey and L. E. Esparza, Charles Sabine, J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
V. M. Seiders U.S. Geological Survey and L. E. Esparza, Charles Sabine, J DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1559-A UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF PART OF THE VENTANA WILDERNESS AND THE BLACK BUTTE, BEAR MOUNTAIN, AND BEAR CANYON ROADLESS AREAS, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By V. M. Seiders U.S. Geological Survey and L. E. Esparza, Charles Sabine, J. M. Spear, Scott Stebbins, and J. R. Benham U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preser­ vation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of part of the Ventana Wilder­ ness and the Black Butte (5102), Bear Mountain (5103), and Bear Canyon (5104) Roadless Areas, Los Padres National Forest, Monterey County, California. The Ventana Wilderness was established by Public Law 91-58; this report discusses additions to the Ventana Wilderness that were established by Public Law 95-237 in 1978. The Black Butte, Bear Mountain, and Bear Canyon Roadless Areas were classified as further planning areas during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. SUMMARY A geologic, geochemical, and geophysical investigation and a survey of claims and prospects have been conducted to eval­ uate the mineral resource potential of part of the Ventana Wilderness and the Black Butte, Bear Mountain, and Bear Canyon Roadless Areas. The study area is part of the Los Padres National Forest and lies in the Santa Lucia Range on the central Cali­ fornia coast. Most of the area is underlain by crystalline basement consisting of high-grade metamorphic rocks intruded by Creta­ ceous granitic plutons which is unconformably overlain by sedimentary rocks of Late Cretaceous and Tertiary age. There has been virtually no mining within the study area. In the central California coastal area, most mining of metallic- mineral deposits has been from rocks of the Franciscan assemblage; igneous and metamorphic rocks like those of the study area have yielded no significant deposits. Geochemical study of 167 stream-sediment samples showed anomalous values of certain elements in 9 samples, but most of these anomalies appear to correlate with minerals that are not abundant enough to indicate resource potential. Field examination and chemical analyses of rock samples revealed little evidence of metallic mineralization. The igneous and metamorphic rocks of the study area have a low potential for metallic-mineral deposits and no potential for oil and gas. Petroleum and natural gas are produced from sandstone in the Monterey Formation in the nearby Salinas Valley. The Monterey in the study area is beyond the known limits of productive sandstone and has a low potential for oil and gas production. Other sedimentary rocks of the area have a very low potential for oil and gas. The sedimentary rocks have a low or no potential for metallic-mineral deposits. The Monterey Formation contains phosphate rock in the study area, but the abundance is not known; there may be a low resource potential. The study area contains deposits of crystalline limestone, sand, and gravel. The deposits are small and inaccessible and thus have a low resource potential. Hot springs of moderate discharge occur adjacent to the area and are utilized as hot baths. No hot springs are known in the study area and thus the potential for geothermal energy is low. INTRODUCTION roads from Greenfield and King City provide access from the east. A paved road from Jolon crosses the range and reaches Area description the coast just south of the area. The study area has rugged relief and dense vegetation. The Ventana Wilderness encompasses approximately Cone Peak, only 3.2 mi from the Pacific Ocean, has an eleva­ 159,000 acres, of which 98,000 acres was initially designated tion of 5,155 ft. Junipero Serra Peak, with an elevation of as a primitive area and 61,000 acres was later added. This 5,862 ft, is the highest peak in the Santa Lucia Range. Much report deals with the areas added to wilderness together with of the area is covered by brush, with stands of oak, madrone, the Black Butte, Bear Mountain, and Bear Canyon Roadless and pine in more moist locations and at higher elevations. Areas. In all, they comprise about 116,000 acres in the Los Redwoods occur in valleys near the coast. The large Marble Padres National Forest, Monterey County, Calif, (fig. 1). For Cone fire of 1977 burned much of the study area north of The the purpose of this report the areas will be referred to collec­ Indians ranch, temporarily eliminating a great deal of nearly tively as the study area. impenetrable brush. Annual precipitation ranges from more The study area is located in the Santa Lucia Range than 100 in. near the coast to about 20 in. inland, falling between U.S. Highway 101 and California Highway 1. Paved mainly between December and April (Pearson and others, 1967). rite, but diorite and gabbro bodies also occur. The largest intrusive bodies are near Junipero Serra and Pinyon Peaks Previous investigations (fig. 1). A few small ultramafic intrusions, some with unusual zoned structure, are spaced widely within the granitic and Numerous reports deal with the geology of the study high-grade metamorphic rocks. Charnockitic tonalite is area. Geologic maps with discussions of the mineral re­ found in the southwestern part of the area (Compton, 1960). sources of parts of the area have been published by Reiche Both the igneous and the metamorphic rocks contain abundant (1937), Fiedler (1944), and Durham (1963, 1970, 1974). Other dikes and pods of pegmatite. Radiometric dating suggests an geologic maps are published by Dibblee (1974), Dickinson emplacement age of 100-110 m.y. (middle Cretaceous) for the (1965), Wiebe (1970), Graham (1979), and Ruetz (1976). The granitic rocks of the northern Santa Lucia Range (Mattinson, area is included in maps of the northern Santa Lucia Range 1978; Ross, 1978). showing reconnaissance geology (Ross, 1976a) and the distri­ The igneous and metamorphic rocks are overlain bution of metamorphic rocks and minerals (Ross, 1976b). The unconformably by sedimentary rocks, mainly sandstone, economic geology of the area is included in Hart's (1966) mudstone, and conglomerate. These rocks show complex study of the mines and mineral resources of Monterey stratigraphic relations and have been assigned various strati- County. Limestone and dolomite resources are described by graphic names (Durham, 1974; Graham, 1979). South and Hart (1978). Gribi (1963) discusses the petroleum geology of west of The Indians the sedimentary rocks are mainly Late the region. The mineral resources of the original Ventana Cretaceous and Paleocene in age. North and east of The Wilderness adjoining the present study area have been inves­ Indians, Paleocene to Miocene age rocks are present. The tigated by Pearson and others (1967). Monterey Formation (Miocene) is a distinctive mudstone unit rich in foraminifers and containing porcelaneous and diato- Present investigation maceous beds. Many rock samples of the Monterey emit a fetid petroliferous odor when freshly broken. In the study The U.S. Geological Survey conducted geologic, geo- area the Monterey is the youngest sedimentary unit exposed. chemical, and geophysical investigations to evaluate the Sand and gravel occur in alluvium and alluvial terraces mineral resource potential of the area. Previous geologic along most streams. These bodies are generally small, but mapping was compiled and modified by additional observa­ near The Indians two broad tongues of bouldery alluvium tions to produce a geologic map of the study area at a scale extend 1 and 3 mi into the mountains along minor streams. of 1:50,000 (Seiders and others, 1983). Geochemical studies chiefly involved the collection and semiquantitative analysis Geochemistry of stream-sediment samples. The analytical results were examined statistically to reveal anomalous concentrations of Stream-sediment samples were collected at 167 local­ elements. An aeromagnetic survey was conducted by R. J. ities. An attempt was made to sample sedynent from each Blakely, (unpub. data, 1982). The U.S. Bureau of Mines re­ drainage basin with an area of about 1 mi and to collect viewed Monterey County records to determine claim loca­ samples along trunk streams at 2 mi intervals. The minus-80- tions. An attempt was made to locate and examine all claims mesh fraction of each sample was analyzed by semiquanti­ and prospects in the field. Chip and grab samples were taken tative spectrographic methods (Motooka and Grimes, 1976) from outcrops, dumps, and float, and placer samples were for 31 elements (Ag, As, Au, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, taken from streambeds and slopewash. Scintillometers were Cu, Fe, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Nb, Ni, Pb, Sb, Sc, Sn, Sr, Ti, V, W, carried during fieldwork in an attempt to detect anomalous Y, Zn, Zr, and Th). Each sample was also analyzed by instru­ radioactivity. Lode and placer samples were also checked for mental methods for mercury (limit of determination, 0.02 radioactivity and fluorescence. ppm (parts per million). Eleven samples representing large drainage areas were analyzed by atomic-absorption spectro- GEOLOGY, GEOCHEMISTRY, AND GEOPHYSICS photometry for gold (limit of determination 0.05 ppm).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 1999 SCREE
    January, 2001 Peak Climbing Section, Loma Prieta Chapter, Sierra Club Vol. 35 No. 1 World Wide Web Address: http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/lomaprieta/pcs Next General Meeting 2001 Publicity Committee Date: Tuesday, January 9 The PCS Publicity Committee for the year 2001 is the following: Time: 7:30 PM Mailings: Paul Vlasveld Listmaster: Steve Eckert Program: Annapurna III, Southwest Buttress Webmaster: Jim Curl In October 1978 a team of people including Ann Scree Editor: Bob Bynum Reynolds made their way to Annapurna III with the I will announce the various e-mail addresses and contact objective of climbing the southwest buttress. information once I get that straightened out. Avalanche conditions on the mountain forced them to We can also use more help with the printing and mailing. If you are interested, please contact me. rethink their route and a line up the west face was chosen. Join us for a slide show by Ann Reynolds • Rick Booth, PCS PubComm Chair recounting this journey. A $2 donation is requested for the slide show. Farewell As Webmaster Location Peninsula Conservation Center 3921 Back in 1994, when the world wide web was young, Silicon East Bayshore Rd, Palo Alto, CA Graphics CEO Ed McCracken instructed all employees that the Directions: From 101: Exit at San Antonio Road, web was our future. He arranged to provide an internet server on the SGI site to be used for employees personal sites and for Go East to the first traffic light, Turn community service pages. I jumped at the opportunity, and left and follow Bayshore Rd to the without stopping to obtain permission from the Sierra Club, I PCC on the corner of Corporation created the first PCS web site on the SGI server.
    [Show full text]
  • Springs of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 338 SPRINGS OF CALIFORNIA BY GEKALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. lntroduction by W. C. Mendenhall ... .. ................................... 5 Physical features of California ...... ....... .. .. ... .. ....... .............. 7 Natural divisions ................... ... .. ........................... 7 Coast Ranges ..................................... ....•.......... _._._ 7 11 ~~:~~::!:: :~~e:_-_-_·.-.·.·: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::: 12 Sierra Nevada .................... .................................... 12 Southeastern desert ......................... ............. .. ..... ... 13 Faults ..... ....... ... ................ ·.. : ..... ................ ..... 14 Natural waters ................................ _.......................... 15 Use of terms "mineral water" and ''pure water" ............... : .·...... 15 ,,uneral analysis of water ................................ .. ... ........ 15 Source and amount of substances in water ................. ............. 17 Degree of concentration of natural waters ........................ ..· .... 21 Properties of mineral waters . ................... ...... _. _.. .. _... _....• 22 Temperature of natural waters ... : ....................... _.. _..... .... : . 24 Classification of mineral waters ............ .......... .. .. _. .. _......... _ 25 Therapeutic value of waters .................................... ... ... 26 Analyses
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) Project Approximately a 35-Mile Section on State Route 1, from Big Sur to Carmel-By-The-Sea, in the County of Monterey
    Big Sur Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) Project Approximately a 35-mile section on State Route 1, from Big Sur to Carmel-by-the-Sea, in the County of Monterey 05-MON-01-PM 39.8/74.6 Project ID: 05-1400-0046 Project EA: 05-1F680 SCH#: 2018011042 Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation April 2018 General Information About This Document The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), has prepared this Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration, which examines the potential environmental impacts of the Big Sur CAPM project on approximately a 35-mile section of State Route 1, located in Monterey County California. The Draft Initial Study was circulated for public review and comment from January 26, 2018 to February 26, 2018. A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Opportunity for Public Hearing was published in the Monterey County Herald on Friday January 26, 2018. The Notice of Intent and Opportunity for Public Hearing was mailed to a list of stakeholders that included both government agencies and private citizen groups who occupy and have interest in the project area. No comments were received during the public circulation period. The project has completed the environmental compliance with circulation of this document. When funding is approved, Caltrans can design and build all or part of the project. Throughout this document, a vertical line in the margin indicates a change that has been made since the draft document
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 General Plan
    I I I I I I MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I MONTEREY COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I I ADOPTED BY THE MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1968 I ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY OCTOBER 22, 1968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N I I I MONTEREY COUNTY I I I I I I PREFACE I The Monterey County General Plan is an attempt to establish a county philosophy based on the values and desires of the people. This in turn becomes a valid basis for decisions by public bodies as well as private enterprise. Such a pro­ cedure is vitally needed in our rapidly changing environment. The General Plan I is a study of the ever changing pattern of Monterey County --a mirror in which to review the past, to comprehend the present, and to contemplate the future, This plan reflects years of research and study as well as many other reports such as I the continuing Facts and Figures, Recreation in Monterey County, Beach Acqui­ sition, and other plans which are shown as separate documents h~cause of the volume of material. I The size of Monterey County, its variety of climate, vegetation, and land forms make it imperative that only large land uses or broad proposals be used to portray geographically the objectives desired for the future development of the County. I Accordingly, in addition to the maps, greater emphasis in the General Plan is placed on the text which conveys in words the objectives as well as the princi­ ples and standards recommended to make them effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur for Other Uses, See Big Sur (Disambiguation)
    www.caseylucius.com [email protected] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Big Sur For other uses, see Big Sur (disambiguation). Big Sur is a lightly populated region of the Central Coast of California where the Santa Lucia Mountains rise abruptly from the Pacific Ocean. Although it has no specific boundaries, many definitions of the area include the 90 miles (140 km) of coastline from the Carmel River in Monterey County south to the San Carpoforo Creek in San Luis Obispo County,[1][2] and extend about 20 miles (30 km) inland to the eastern foothills of the Santa Lucias. Other sources limit the eastern border to the coastal flanks of these mountains, only 3 to 12 miles (5 to 19 km) inland. Another practical definition of the region is the segment of California State Route 1 from Carmel south to San Simeon. The northern end of Big Sur is about 120 miles (190 km) south of San Francisco, and the southern end is approximately 245 miles (394 km) northwest of Los Angeles. The name "Big Sur" is derived from the original Spanish-language "el sur grande", meaning "the big south", or from "el país grande del sur", "the big country of the south". This name refers to its location south of the city of Monterey.[3] The terrain offers stunning views, making Big Sur a popular tourist destination. Big Sur's Cone Peak is the highest coastal mountain in the contiguous 48 states, ascending nearly a mile (5,155 feet/1571 m) above sea level, only 3 miles (5 km) from the ocean.[4] The name Big Sur can also specifically refer to any of the small settlements in the region, including Posts, Lucia and Gorda; mail sent to most areas within the region must be addressed "Big Sur".[5] It also holds thousands of marathons each year.
    [Show full text]
  • UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer
    UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer Photographs - Job Number Index Description Job Number Date Thompson Lawn 1350 1946 August Peter Thatcher 1467 undated Villa Moderne, Taylor and Vial - Carmel 1645-1951 1948 Telephone Building 1843 1949 Abrego House 1866 undated Abrasive Tools - Bob Gilmore 2014, 2015 1950 Inn at Del Monte, J.C. Warnecke. Mark Thomas 2579 1955 Adachi Florists 2834 1957 Becks - interiors 2874 1961 Nicholas Ten Broek 2878 1961 Portraits 1573 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1517 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1573 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1581 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1873 circa 1945-1960 Portraits unnumbered circa 1945-1960 [Naval Radio Training School, Monterey] unnumbered circa 1945-1950 [Men in Hardhats - Sign reads, "Hitler Asked for It! Free Labor is Building the Reply"] unnumbered circa 1945-1950 CZ [Crown Zellerbach] Building - Sonoma 81510 1959 May C.Z. - SOM 81552 1959 September C.Z. - SOM 81561 1959 September Crown Zellerbach Bldg. 81680 1960 California and Chicago: landscapes and urban scenes unnumbered circa 1945-1960 Spain 85343 1957-1958 Fleurville, France 85344 1957 Berardi fountain & water clock, Rome 85347 1980 Conciliazione fountain, Rome 84154 1980 Ferraioli fountain, Rome 84158 1980 La Galea fountain, in Vatican, Rome 84160 1980 Leone de Vaticano fountain (RR station), Rome 84163 1980 Mascherone in Vaticano fountain, Rome 84167 1980 Pantheon fountain, Rome 84179 1980 1 UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer Photographs - Job Number Index Quatre Fountain, Rome 84186 1980 Torlonai
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1.1 Introduction This Section Describes the Aesthetic and Visual
    Paraiso Springs Resort Draft Environmental Impact Report 3.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources 3.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 3.1.1 Introduction This section describes the aesthetic and visual resource conditions at the project site and in the project vicinity; presents the regulatory framework applicable to the proposed project; and discusses the potential aesthetic impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed project. The primary aesthetic concerns associated with the proposed project are potential changes in aesthetic character of the project site; impacts to public viewsheds; and/or obstruction of existing views. The project-specific information and analysis within this section is primarily based on project plans and site reconnaissance and photo documentation of the project site performed by RBF Consulting during the spring of 2007, and a subsequent site visit and documentation by EMC Planning Group in the fall of 2012. 3.1.2 Environmental Setting Local Visual Resources The project site consists of about 235 acres nestled in the mouth of a canyon extending westward into the foothills located at the western terminus of Paraiso Springs Road on the eastern slope of the Sierra de Salinas Foothills in the Salinas Valley, approximately seven miles west of the City of Greenfield. Elevations at the project site range from approximately 1,000 feet in the southern portion of the project site to slightly over 2,400 feet along the ridgelines. Views from the project site consist of scenic ridgelines north, west, and south, and the expansive Salinas Valley to the east. Surrounding land uses currently consist of agricultural uses and grazing, as well as several single-family residences located along Paraiso Springs Road located east of the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Accomplishments in the Big Sur Coast Area
    CCC Hearing Item: Th 13.3 February 9, 2012 _______________________________________________________________ California Coastal Commission’s 40th Anniversary Report Coastal Management in Big Sur History and Accomplishments Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR SOUTHERN BIG SUR Gorda “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, southbound, north of Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Cape San Martin, Big Sur Coast. CCRP#1649 9/2/2002 “A Highway Runs Through It” Heading south on Highway One. “A Highway Runs Through It” Southbound Highway One, near Partington Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, south of Mill Creek. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Historic Big Creek Bridge, at entrance to U.C. Big Creek Reserve. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, looking south to the coastal terrace at Pacific Valley. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Monterey County line, looking south into San Luis Obispo County, with Ragged Point and Piedras Blancas in far distance (on the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 NORTHERN BIG SUR “Grand Entrance View” (from the north) of the Big Sur Coast, looking southwards to Soberanes Point, with Point Sur in the distance (on the horizon to the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Garrapata State Park/Beach, looking north to Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Mouth of Garrapata Creek (from Highway One). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Sign for Rocky Point Restaurant, with Notley’s Landing and Rocky Creek Bridge in distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Lobos State Natural Reserve ⁞North Shore Cannery Point Trail
    Point Lobos State Natural Reserve ⁞ North Shore Cannery Point Trail ⁞ 3 Miles ⁞ Easy Carmelo Meadow Trail > Granite Point Trail > North Shore Trail > Point Lobos to Cannery Point > North Shore Trail > Cypress Grove Trail > Lace Lichen Trail FYI • Parking Pass $10 in designated lot Visit California Parks’ website for more information HERE. http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=571 Point Lobos State Natural Reserve ⁞ South Shore Trail ⁞ 2 Miles ⁞ Easy Bird Island Trail > China Cove > South Shore Trail > Sand Hill Trail > Sea Lion Point Trail > South Shore Trail FYI • Parking $10 Visit California Parks’ website for more information HERE. http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=571 Fort Ord ⁞ Badger Hills Trailhead ⁞ 5.8 Miles ⁞ Moderate Toro Creek Road > Guidotti Road > Skyline Road > Oil Well Road > Toro Creek Road FYI • Dog Friendly Visit Fort Ord National Monument website for more information HERE. https://www.blm.gov/visit/fort-ord-national-monument Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park ⁞ Buzzards Roost Trail ⁞ 2.6 Miles ⁞ Moderate Buzzards Roost Trail FYI • $10/day per car. Do not expect your phone to work here. Visit Monterey County Parks website for more information HERE. https://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=29833 Ventana Wilderness ⁞ Cone Peak Trail ⁞ 4.5 Miles ⁞ Moderate-Strenuous Turn off HWY 1 between Kirk Creek Campground and Mill Creek Picnic Area > Naciemento-Fergusson Rd > Forest Rte 22S05 > Cone Peak Trailhead FYI • Dog Friendly • Forest Rte22S05 to trailhead is a dirt road More information HERE. http://www.ventanawild.org/trails/ventana-wilderness-trails/cone-peak-trail Pinnacles National Park ⁞ High Peaks-Condor Gulch Trail ⁞ 7.5 Miles ⁞ Strenuous From Chaparral Ranger Station—Juniper Canyon Trail > Tunnel Trail > High Peaks Trail > Condor Gulch Trail > High Peaks Trail > Juniper Canyon Trail FYI • Parking Pass $30—valid for seven days • 4th graders and their families can visit National Parks Free www.everykidinapark.gov Visit Pinnacles website for more information HERE.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Monterey County Salinas River The Salinas River consists of more than 75 stream miles and drains a watershed of about 4,780 square miles. The river flows northwest from headwaters on the north side of Garcia Mountain to its mouth near the town of Marina. A stone and concrete dam is located about 8.5 miles downstream from the Salinas Dam. It is approximately 14 feet high and is considered a total passage barrier (Hill pers. comm.). The dam forming Santa Margarita Lake is located at stream mile 154 and was constructed in 1941. The Salinas Dam is operated under an agreement requiring that a “live stream” be maintained in the Salinas River from the dam continuously to the confluence of the Salinas and Nacimiento rivers. When a “live stream” cannot be maintained, operators are to release the amount of the reservoir inflow. At times, there is insufficient inflow to ensure a “live stream” to the Nacimiento River (Biskner and Gallagher 1995). In addition, two of the three largest tributaries of the Salinas River have large water storage projects. Releases are made from both the San Antonio and Nacimiento reservoirs that contribute to flows in the Salinas River. Operations are described in an appendix to a 2001 EIR: “ During periods when…natural flow in the Salinas River reaches the north end of the valley, releases are cut back to minimum levels to maximize storage. Minimum releases of 25 cfs are required by agreement with CDFG and flows generally range from 25-25[sic] cfs during the minimum release phase of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Government Documents and Publications First Nations Era 3-10-2017 2005 – An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_ind_1 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Education Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "2005 – An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumas Communities – 1769 to 1810" (2017). Government Documents and Publications. 4. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_ind_1/4 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the First Nations Era at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government Documents and Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumash Communities – 1769 to 1810 By: Randall Milliken and John R. Johnson March 2005 FAR WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. 2727 Del Rio Place, Suite A, Davis, California, 95616 http://www.farwestern.com 530-756-3941 Prepared for Caltrans Contract No. 06A0148 & 06A0391 For individuals with sensory disabilities this document is available in alternate formats. Please call or write to: Gale Chew-Yep 2015 E. Shields, Suite 100 Fresno, CA 93726 (559) 243-3464 Voice CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929 An Ethnogeography of Salinan and Northern Chumash Communities – 1769 to 1810 By: Randall Milliken Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. and John R. Johnson Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Submitted by: Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. 2727 Del Rio Place, Davis, California, 95616 Submitted to: Valerie Levulett Environmental Branch California Department of Transportation, District 5 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered C N - S L ,
    8/23/2018 ESCTP:: Abies bracteata Fact Sheet A Endangered C N - S L , F - P (P F) S S - F S - Habitat and Associates Discontinuous stands of one to hundreds of trees, generally comprising < 5 ha, in less fireprone areas such as steep, w-, n-, or e-facing slopes in canyons or ravines, often in moist microsites near the bottom or at the head of drainages, often in talus or scree; above 1400 m on all exposures on rocky ridgetops, bluffs, or cliffs; and occasionally on stream benches or terraces. Generally in rocky, clayey, or loamy soil, occasionally on sandstone and serpentine (Talley 1974, CNDDB 2017, CNPS 2016 & 2017). Closed-canopy stands with the shrub layer open to intermittent and a sparse herb layer occur most often within montane or lower montane hardwood– conifer forest; frequently associated with Quercus chrysolepis, Pinus coulteri, or Pinus lambertiana (Junipero Serra Peak and Cone Peak). Occasionally in chaparral (especially young trees) or riparian woodland, and, rarely, at lower elevations just upslope from redwood forest (Talley 1974). Other associates include Alnus rhombifolia, Acer macrophyllum, Arbutus menziesii, Calocedrus Santa Lucia fir (Abies bracteata), from Cyclopedia of American Horticulture, 1909. decurrens, Notholithocarpus densiflorus var. densiflorus, Pinus ponderosa var. pacifica, Quercus agrifolia var. agrifolia, Quercus parvula var. shrevei, and Umbellularia californica, (CNDDB 2017, CNPS 2017); Pinus sabiniana is an associate in one of the southermost stands (Hoover 1970). Elevation 183–1555 m (generally > 500 m; with more than half of distribution > 1000 m) (Talley 1974, Farjon 2010). An Abies bracteata Forest Alliance is described in the Manual for California Vegetation Online (CNPS 2017) in areas where the fir has > 30% relative cover when co-dominant with Quercus chrysolepis.
    [Show full text]