DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places As the Designated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places As the Designated NPS Form 10-900-bOMB Approval No. 1024—0018 (Rev. Aug 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. __X__ New Submission ____ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Southern Florida Sites Associated with the Tequesta and their Ancestors B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Archaic Origins of the Tequesta ca. 10,000-500 B.C. Development of Glades Pottery 500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Settlement Patterns 2500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Plant and Animal Use among the Tequesta 500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Mortuary Practices 500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Earthwork Building 500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Exchange Networks 2500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Tequesta Art and Aesthetics 500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Sociopolitical Development 500 B.C.-A.D. 1763 Culture Contact A.D. 1500-A.D. 1763 C. Form Prepared by name/title Ryan J. Wheeler, Ph.D., Chief, Bureau of Archaeological Research organization Florida Division of Historical Resources date May 2004 street & number 500 South Bronough Street telephone 850.245.6300 city or town Tallahassee state FL zip code 32309-0250 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (G See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ______________________________________________ ____________________ Signature and title of certifying official Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. _______________________________________________ ___________________ NPS Form 10-900-bOMB Approval No. 1024—0018 (Rev. Aug 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Signature of the Keeper Date of Action NPS Form 10-900-bOMB Approval No. 1024—0018 (Rev. Aug 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. E. Statement of Historic Contexts (If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) Page Numbers Introduction 3 Modern American Indian Perspectives 4 Archeology, History and the Tequesta 5 Archaic Origins of the Tequesta 6 Development of Glades Pottery 8 Settlement Patterns 11 Plant and Animal Use among the Tequesta 15 Mortuary Practices 26 Earthwork Building 30 Exchange Networks 32 Tequesta Art and Aesthetics 34 Sociopolitical Development 36 Culture Contact 37 Summary 41 F. Associated Property Types (Provide description, significance, and registration requirements.) Significance of the Tequesta and their Ancestors 43 NHL Thematic Framework 43 Criteria for the Evaluation of Tequesta and their Ancestors Sites 44 Establishing Significance 45 Levels of Significance 46 Accretionary Middens 46 Knoll sites 49 Burial Mound sites 50 Cemetery sites 52 Temple Mound sites 54 Prehistoric Earthwork sites 56 Constructed Habitation Mound sites 58 Aboriginal Water Course or Canal 59 Significant Sites of the Tequesta and their Ancestors/Potential NHL Sites 64 G. Geographical Data 68 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing.) 69 I. Major Bibliographical References (List major written works and primary location of additional documentation: State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, local government, university, or 71 other, specifying repository.) Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section _E_ Page _5_ Southern Florida Sites Associated with the Tequesta and their Ancestors Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 120 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.0. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503 NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section _E_ Page _6_ Southern Florida Sites Associated with the Tequesta and their Ancestors E. HISTORIC CONTEXTS Introduction This NHL theme study, Southern Florida Sites Associated with the Tequesta and their Ancestors, was developed to provide the archeological and historical context for the National Historic Landmark (NHL) nomination of the Miami Circle at Brickell Point site. Discussions among archeologists who worked at the site and the Florida Division of Historical Resources National Register of Historic Places survey and registration staff in mid-2003 led to the conclusion that the Miami Circle site was significant at the national level, but that it would be difficult to nominate the site since existing NHL theme studies did not reflect the unique character of the ancient Tequesta people who once occupied southeastern Florida, their role in the early history of the United States, and the potential contribution of archeological sites in the region to understanding broader patterns of American Indian architecture, exchange, and ceremonialism. Sites of the Tequesta and their ancestors were recognized as regionally and nationally significant for several reasons. The first reason is the association between the Tequesta and the Everglades. Considerable attention has recently been focused on restoration of the Everglades ecosystem, a unique hydrological system found in large portions of Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade counties. Today, the coastal portions of these counties are dominated by the urban and suburban development of West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale and Miami—making it difficult to visualize the estuarine lagoons; narrow, sandy beaches; and streams draining the Everglades marsh that were home to the Tequesta people. Development has pushed westward from the coast, and now the remnants of the Everglades are preserved in three major water conservation areas, the Arthur G. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge and Everglades National Park. Unfortunately, recent historical and environmental perspectives on the Everglades have ignored the role of the Tequesta in shaping and controlling the Everglades system (see McCally 1999). Archeological investigation of Everglades tree island communities indicates that the Tequesta may have intentionally contributed to the formation of these islands. Better understanding of tree island formation, and the integral relationship of the Tequesta and the Everglades, may aid in developing restoration strategies. Secondly, some sites of the Tequesta and their ancestors exhibit considerable engineering accomplishments related to the construction of long-distance canoe canals. This accomplishment is equivalent to irrigation canals built by prehistoric cultures in the American Southwest (Busch et al. 1976), raised causeways connecting some Maya sites in Mesoamerica (Coe 1987: 64, 104, 113-114; Sabloff 1989:212), or irrigation canals built by some coastal South American cultures (Moseley 1983:189-190, 234-235), representing a major element of the aquatic adaptation that developed during the Archaic. Archeologists John Griffin (1988:308) and George Luer (1989) also suggest that the construction of these long-distance canoe canals is archeological evidence for social complexity. Thirdly, the Tequesta were one of the first American Indian groups encountered by Ponce de Leon in the early sixteenth century. Some
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Florida Historical Quarterly
    Florida Historical Quarterly V OLUME XXXVIII July 1959 - April 1960 Published by the FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONTENTS OF VOLUME XXXVIII Anderson, Russell H., The Shaker Community in Florida, 29 Arnade, Charles W., Florida On Trial, review of, 254 Bashful, Emmett W., The Florida Supreme Court, review of, 355 Beater, Jack, True Tales of the Florida West Coast, review of, 175 Book reviews, 74, 172, 252, 347 Boyd, Mark F., Historic Sites in and Around the Jim Woodruff Reservoir Area, Florida-Georgia, review of, 351 Camp, Vaughan, Jr., book review of, 173 Capron, Louis, The Spanish Dance, 91 Carpetbag Rule in Florida, review of, 357 Carson, Ruby Leach, book review of, 252 Carter, Clarence Edwin, (ed.), The Territory of Florida, review of, 347 Contributors, 90, 194, 263, 362 Corliss, Carlton J., Henry M. Flagler, Railroad Builder, 195 Covington, James W., Trade Relations Between Southwestern Florida and Cuba, 1600-1840, 114; book reviews of, 175, 254 Cushman, Joseph D., Jr., The Episcopal Church in Florida Dur- ing the Civil War, 294 Documents Pertaining to the Georgia-Florida Frontier, 1791- 1793, by Richard K. Murdoch, 319 Doherty, Herbert J., book review by, 78; The Whigs of Florida, 1845-1854, review of, 173 Douglas, Marjory Stoneman, Hurricane, review of, 178 Dovell, J. E., book review of, 351 Dodd, Dorothy, book review of, 347 “Early Birds” of Florida, by Walter P. Fuller, 63 Episcopal Church in Florida During the Civil War, by Joseph D. Cushman, Jr., 294 Florida - A Way of Life, review of, 252 Florida Handbook, review of, 172 Florida on Trial, 1593-1602, review of, 254 Florida Supreme Court, review of, 355 Foreman, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
    [Show full text]
  • The Everglades Before Reclamation
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 26 Number 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 26, Article 4 Issue 1 1947 The Everglades Before Reclamation J. E. Dovell Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Dovell, J. E. (1947) "The Everglades Before Reclamation," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 26 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol26/iss1/4 Dovell: The Everglades Before Reclamation THE EVERGLADES BEFORE RECLAMATION by J. E. DOVELL Within our own generation a scientist who always weighed his words could say of the Everglades: Of the few as yet but very imperfectly explored regions in the United States, the largest perhaps is the southernmost part of Florida below the 26th degree of northern latitude. This is particularly true of the central and western portions of this region, which inland are an unmapped wilderness of everglades and cypress swamps, and off-shore a maze of low mangrove “keys” or islands, mostly unnamed and uncharted, with channels, “rivers” and “bays” about them which are known only to a few of the trappers and hunters who have lived a greater part of their life in that region. 1 This was Ales Hrdlicka of the Smithsonian Institution, the author of a definitive study of anthropology in Florida written about 1920 ; and it is not far from the truth today.
    [Show full text]
  • Everglades National Park and the Seminole Problem
    EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK 21 7 Invaders and Swamps Large numbers of Americans began migrating into south Florida during the late nineteenth century after railroads had cut through the forests and wetlands below Lake Okeechobee. By the 1880s engineers and land developers began promoting drainage projects, convinced that technology could transform this water-sogged country into land suitable for agriculture. At the turn of the cen- EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK AND THE tury, steam shovels and dredges hissed and wheezed their way into the Ever- glades, bent on draining the Southeast's last wilderness. They were the latest of SEMlNOLE PROBLEM many intruders. Although Spanish explorers had arrived on the Florida coast early in the sixteenth century, Spain's imperial toehold never grew beyond a few fragile It seems we can't do anything but harm to those people even outposts. Inland remained mysterious, a cartographic void, El Laguno del Es- when we try to help them. pirito Santo. Following Spain, the British too had little success colonizing the -Old Man Temple, Key Largo, 1948 interior. After several centuries, all that Europeans had established were a few scattered coastal forts. Nonetheless, Europe's hand fell heavily through disease and warfare upon the aboriginal Xmucuan, Apalachee, and Calusa people. By 1700 the peninsula's interior and both coasts were almost devoid of Indians. Swollen by tropical rains and overflowing every summer for millennia, Lake The vacuum did not last long. Creeks from Georgia and Alabama soon Filtered Okeechobee releases a sheet of water that drains south over grass-covered marl into Florida's panhandle and beyond, occupying native hunting grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources
    Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources Everglades National Park was created primarily because of its unique flora and fauna. In the 1920s and 1930s there was some limited understanding that the park might contain significant prehistoric archeological resources, but the area had not been comprehensively surveyed. After establishment, the park’s first superintendent and the NPS regional archeologist were surprised at the number and potential importance of archeological sites. NPS investigations of the park’s archeological resources began in 1949. They continued off and on until a more comprehensive three-year survey was conducted by the NPS Southeast Archeological Center (SEAC) in the early 1980s. The park had few structures from the historic period in 1947, and none was considered of any historical significance. Although the NPS recognized the importance of the work of the Florida Federation of Women’s Clubs in establishing and maintaining Royal Palm State Park, it saw no reason to preserve any physical reminders of that work. Archeological Investigations in Everglades National Park The archeological riches of the Ten Thousand Islands area were hinted at by Ber- nard Romans, a British engineer who surveyed the Florida coast in the 1770s. Romans noted: [W]e meet with innumerable small islands and several fresh streams: the land in general is drowned mangrove swamp. On the banks of these streams we meet with some hills of rich soil, and on every one of those the evident marks of their having formerly been cultivated by the savages.812 Little additional information on sites of aboriginal occupation was available until the late nineteenth century when South Florida became more accessible and better known to outsiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Ammodramus Maritimus Mirabilis
    Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis ape Sable seaside sparrows (Ammodramus Federal Status: Endangered (March 11, 1967) maritimus mirabilis) are medium-sized sparrows Critical Habitat: Designated (August 11, 1977) Crestricted to the Florida peninsula. They are non- Florida Status: Endangered migratory residents of freshwater to brackish marshes. The Cape Sable seaside sparrow has the distinction of being the Recovery Plan Status: Revision (May 18, 1999) last new bird species described in the continental United Geographic Coverage: Rangewide States prior to its reclassification to subspecies status. The restricted range of the Cape Sable seaside sparrow led to its initial listing in 1969. Changes in habitat that have Figure 1. County distribution of the Cape Sable seaside sparrrow. occurred as a result of changes in the distribution, timing, and quantity of water flows in South Florida, continue to threaten the subspecies with extinction. This account represents a revision of the existing recovery plan for the Cape Sable seaside sparrow (FWS 1983). Description The Cape Sable seaside sparrow is a medium-sized sparrow, 13 to 14 cm in length (Werner 1975). Of all the seaside sparrows, it is the lightest in color (Curnutt 1996). The dorsal surface is dark olive-grey and the tail and wings are olive- brown (Werner 1975). Adult birds are light grey to white ventrally, with dark olive grey streaks on the breast and sides. The throat is white with a dark olive-grey or black whisker on each side. Above the whisker is a white line along the lower jaw. A grey ear patch outlined by a dark line sits behind each eye.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H
    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H3575
    June 9, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3575 presumptive nominees for the Office of Recently, West End Ambulance and postpartum depression in communities President of the United States, a prin- the Phoenixville Fire and Police De- across this country. ciple memorialized in section 370 of the partments responded to a call for help. f House Rules and Manual. These devoted crews assisted an indi- THREE BRANCHES OF vidual who went into cardiac arrest. f GOVERNMENT Through their swift efforts to admin- SCHUYLKILL SCHOLASTIC ister CPR, the responders were able to The SPEAKER pro tempore. The DRINKING WATER AWARD save a life. Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The Chester County EMS Council Texas (Ms. JACKSON LEE) for 5 minutes. Chair recognizes the gentleman from recognized the responders for their ex- Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Speaker, I Pennsylvania (Mr. COSTELLO) for 5 min- pertise on May 28, coinciding with Na- am a Member of the United States Con- utes. tional Emergency Medical Services gress and a very—I hate to use the Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania. Mr. Week, which honors those serving on term proud, but I am proud to have Speaker, I rise today to highlight the our communities’ front lines every day. been a member of the Judiciary Com- work of students from Perkiomen Val- Mr. Speaker, I commend and thank mittee for the number of years that I ley High School and Phoenixville Area these and all firefighters, officers, have served in this august place. Middle School. EMTs, and paramedics for their serv- As I serve, I am well aware of the im- Recently, the Schuylkill Action Net- ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite of State of Florida Division of Historic Preservation Office Letter and Cultural Resource Reports
    ATTACHMENT 1 Composite of State of Florida Division of Historic Preservation Office Letter and Cultural Resource Reports Environmental Assessment for the Coral Reef Commons Project Incidental Take Permit Application Frozune Xlspenrli{ENT o RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Govemor Secretary of State Mr. Roberl Carr December 9,2015 Archaeological and Historical Conservancv, Inc. 4800 S.W. 64m Ave., Suire 107 Davie, Florida 33314 Re: DHR Project File No.: 2015-5923 / Received by DHR: November 9, 2015 A Phase II Cttltural Resource Assessment of SDA11320, BDAl432l, BDA I 13 22, and SDAI I 3 96. Dade County, Florida Dear Mr. Carr: Our office received and reviewed the above re1'erenced surve), report in accordance rvith Chapters 267 and313 of the Florida Statutes, and the applicable Dacle County ordinances, for possible advLrse impact to cultural resources (any prehistoric or histolrc district, site. building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of l-listoric places (NRHP). In June and July 2015, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AFIC) conducted a phase II assessment of the Coral Reef Cornmons parcel on behalf of Johnson Engineering,Inc. AHC investigated resources 8DA14320,SDA14321,8DA14322, and identified archaeological site 8DA14396, It is the opinion of AHC that resources BDAl4321,BDA|4322, and8DA143g6 are eligible forthe NRHP. AHC had insufficient information to determine the eligibility of site 8DA14320. Resources 8DA14320 and 8DA14396 are located within natural areas of the project parcel, and AHC recommends that they are preserved, Based on tlie ir,fonnation providecl, or-rr office finds the submitted report complete and sufficient in accordance rvitllthapter lA-46, Florida Administrative Code.It is our opinion that resources DA14321, 8D4I4322, and 8DA14396 are ineligible for the NRHP.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing a Model to Investigate Calusa Salvage of 16Th- and Early-17Th-Century Spanish Shipwrecks
    THEY ARE RICH ONLY BY THE SEA: TESTING A MODEL TO INVESTIGATE CALUSA SALVAGE OF 16TH- AND EARLY-17TH-CENTURY SPANISH SHIPWRECKS by Kelsey Marie McGuire B.A., Mercyhurst University, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2014 The thesis of Kelsey McGuire is approved: ____________________________________________ _________________ Amy Mitchell-Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Gregory Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Marie-Therese Champagne, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ John Worth, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ _________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School Date ! ACKNOWLEDGMENTS If not for the financial, academic, and moral support of dozens of people and research institutions, I could not have seen this project to completion. I would not have taken the first steps without financial support from Dr. Elizabeth Benchley and the UWF Archaeology Institute, the UWF Student Government Association. In addition, this project was supported by a grant from the University of West Florida through the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. Their generous contributions afforded the opportunity to conduct my historical research in Spain. The trip was also possible through of the logistical support of Karen Mims. Her help at the Archaeology Institute was invaluable then and throughout my time at UWF. Thank you to my research companion, Danielle Dadiego.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 August 6, 2013 VITA JOHN C. WHITTAKER Personal Information
    1 August 6, 2013 VITA JOHN C. WHITTAKER Personal Information Born: September 6, 1953, Richland, Washington Married: Kathryn Kamp Citizenship: USA Dept. of Anthropology Grinnell College Grinnell, IA 50112-0806 641-269-3447 [email protected] Degrees B.A. (1975) Cornell University, cum laude in Anthropology M.A. (1979) University of Arizona, Anthropology PhD. (1984) University of Arizona, Anthropology Dissertation Title: Arrowheads and Artisans: Stone Tool Manufacture and Individual Variation at Grasshopper Pueblo Honors and Grants - New York State Regents Scholarship 1971-1975 - University of Arizona Graduate Research Development Fund Grant 1980 - Comins Fellowship 1981 (Univ. of Arizona, Anthro Dept) - Agnese N. Lindley Foundation: grant in support of Grinnell College Archaeological Field School, 1985 field season - Grinnell College Grant Board Faculty Research Grants yearly since 1987. - Sloan Foundation/Grinnell College Technology Concentration grants to support Bronze Technology experiments in Prehistory class 1988, 1991 - Matching Challenge Grants from Coconino National Forest in support of 1992 and 1994 Archaeological Field Schools - World Atlatl Association Top 10 Award, 2000, 2001, 2006 - Henry Luce Foundation research grant “Four Thousand Years of Environmental Change in a Maya Forest” $500,000 to support five year teaching/research project, with D. Campbell, K. Kamp, 2001 - World Atlatl Association President’s Award, 2012 Teaching Experience Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa. Professor, May 2001
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Everglades to the 1920S Introduction
    Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s Introduction The Everglades is a vast wetland, 40 to 50 miles wide and 100 miles long. Prior to the twentieth century, the Everglades occupied most of the Florida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee.1 Originally about 4,000 square miles in extent, the Everglades included extensive sawgrass marshes dotted with tree islands, wet prairies, sloughs, ponds, rivers, and creeks. Since the 1880s, the Everglades has been drained by canals, compartmentalized behind levees, and partially transformed by agricultural and urban development. Although water depths and flows have been dramatically altered and its spatial extent reduced, the Everglades today remains the only subtropical ecosystem in the United States and one of the most extensive wetland systems in the world. Everglades National Park embraces about one-fourth of the original Everglades plus some ecologically distinct adjacent areas. These adjacent areas include slightly elevated uplands, coastal mangrove forests, and bays, notably Florida Bay. Everglades National Park has been recognized as a World Heritage Site, an International Biosphere Re- serve, and a Wetland of International Importance. In this work, the term Everglades or Everglades Basin will be reserved for the wetland ecosystem (past and present) run- ning between the slightly higher ground to the east and west. The term South Florida will be used for the broader area running from the Kississimee River Valley to the toe of the peninsula.2 Early in the twentieth century, a magazine article noted of the Everglades that “the region is not exactly land, and it is not exactly water.”3 The presence of water covering the land to varying depths through all or a major portion of the year is the defining feature of the Everglades.
    [Show full text]