Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II Originally built by Thutmose II - 1492 BCE to 1479 BCE Modified by Hatshepsut - 1479 BCE to 1458 BCE Modified by Thutmose III - 1479 BCE to 1425 BCE Modified by Amenhotep II - 1427 BCE to 1401 BCE Modified by Thutmose IV - 1401 BCE to 1391 BCE Destroyed by: Amenhotep III - 1390 BCE to 1352 BCE Contains features: Amenhotep II Shrine, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall East Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall Other works initiated by Hatshepsut: Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Palace of Ma’at, 8th Pylon, Amenhotep I Calcite Chapel, Obelisks at Contra Temple, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall, Wadjet Hall, Red Chapel Other works initiated by Thutmose III: Akhmenu, Contra Temple, Wadjet Hall, 7th Pylon, Thutmose III Shrine, Enclosures and Gates, Sacred Lake, 6th Pylon and Court, 5th Pylon and Court, Obelisks of 7th Pylon, Station of the King and Corridor, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Central Bark Shrine, Palace of Ma’at, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall, East Exterior Wall Other works initiated by Amenhotep II: Edifice of Amenhotep II, Station of the Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II King and Corridor, Wadjet Hall, Amenhotep II Shrine in its existing state. Other works initiated by Thutmose IV: Obelisk Unique, Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall Other works destroyed by Amenhotep III: Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, White Chapel, Amenhotep II Shrine, Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel Other halls: Akhmenu, Hypostyle Hall, Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall, Wadjet Hall Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II Introduction The pylon and “festival court” of Thutmose II originally stood to the west of the fourth pylon. These structures were completed destroyed by later construction at the site and can no longer be seen in their original location at Karnak. A num- ber of kings made architectural additions to the hall, most of which also disap- peared during the reworking of the area. Remains of the stone pylons and court doorways have been found at Karnak and provide some information on the original appearance of this area. Some of these were reconstructed at Karnak and can be seen in the Open Air Museum. Measurements: The pylon towers were theoretically reconstructed to measure 55m by 10m at each base. The court area would have covered 73m by 38m (deep). Phase: Thutmose II Thutmose II built his pylon and court to the west of pylon IV, creating a new western entrance to the temple and linking the north/south and east/west pro- cessional routes at the site of the court. The construction of this court enclosed the obelisks of Thutmose I and probably the “white chapel” of Senusret I and the limestone chapel of Amenhotep I. Construction materials: limestone About the reconstruction model of this phase The reconstruction of the pylon and court on the model are based on the hypothesized form of these structures shown in the plans and axial draw- ings of Gabolde (1993: fig. V, pl. III-VII). A plain limestone pattern was applied to these features. None of the in- scriptions or decoration (which can be seen on the reconstructed sections of the pylon towers in the Open Air Museum at Karnak) was added to the model. Renderings of the Pylon and Festival Court as completed during the reign of Thutmose II. Large wooden flagstaffs have been added to the pylon towers. These would have been topped with colorful cloth banners. The tall poles stood on stone bases, and were arranged within square notches left in the py- lon’s exterior masonry. Clamps secured to the pylon itself (not shown on the model) further stabilized their upper portions. The form and size of the flagstaffs were based on representations of these features found at temples and tombs. These show the poles as reaching above the height of Sullivan 2008, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II. Digital Karnak. 2 Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II the pylon and tapering as they rise (Azim and Traunecker (1982: fig. 4). Phase: Hatshepsut Hatshepsut erected the pair of obelisks commissioned by Thutmose II. See the entry Obelisks of Festival Hall, West Pair for information on these features. Construction materials: red granite Phase: Thutmose III Thutmose III erected a third pair of obelisks, between those of Thutmose I and Thutmose II. See Obelisks of Festival Hall, Center Pair for information on these features. Construction materials: rose granite Phase: Amenhotep II Amenhotep II added a small white alabaster chapel between the obelisks of Thut- mose I. See Amenhotep II Shrine for information on this feature. Construction materials: calcite (“Egyptian alabaster”) Phase: Thutmose IV Thutmose IV adorned the court with a double peristyle of square pillars and small alabaster shrine. See Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall for information on these features. Construction materials: sandstone, calcite (“Egyptian alabaster”) Destruction: Amenhotep III Amenhotep III demolished the pylon and the western side of the court in order to construct the third pylon. His new pylon was situated east of the Thutmose II pylon, shrinking the area of the court between the temple’s entrance and the fourth pylon. The western half of the pillared peristyle of Thutmose IV was disassembled. Four pillars from the peristyle were discovered in the northeast corner of this smaller court, suggesting that the eastern peristyle may have remained. The obelisks of Thutmose II were removed and their bases were incorporated into the third pylon. The pillars of the peristyle, Thutmose IV’s shrine, the Amenhotep II shrine, the “white chapel” of Senusret I and the limestone chapel of Amenhotep I Sullivan 2008, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II. Digital Karnak. 3 Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II were all used as fill in the new pylon. Bibliography and Sources Used for Model Construction Azim, Michel and Claude Traunecker (1982), “Un mât du IXe Pylône au nome d’Horemheb.” Cahiers de Karnak, vol. VII, 75-92. Gabolde, Luc (1993), “La “cour de fêtes” de Thoutmosis II à Karnak..” Cahiers de Karnak, vol. IX, 1-100. Further reading Golvin, Jean-Claude (1987), “la restauration antique du passage du IIIe pylône.” Cahiers de Karnak, vol. VIII, 189-206. © 2008 All rights reserved. Sullivan 2008, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II. Digital Karnak. 4 Regents of the University of California..
Recommended publications
  • The Image of the 'Warrior Pharaoh'
    The image of the ‘warrior pharaoh’ The mighty ‘warrior pharaoh’ is one of the most enduring images of ancient Egypt and dates to the beginnings of Egyptian civilisation around 3000 BC . It was both a political and a religious statement and emphasised the king’s role as the divine upholder of maat, the Egyptian concept of order. The king is shown triumphing over the forces of chaos, represented by foreign enemies and bound captives. In earlier times, the king, a distant and mysterious being, was held in godlike awe by his subjects. However, by New Kingdom times he was a more earthly, vulnerable figure who fought alongside his troops in battle. The militarism of the New Kingdom gave birth to a new heroic age. To the traditional elements of the warrior pharaoh image was added the chariot, one of the most important innovations of this period. The essential features of the New Kingdom ‘warrior pharaoh’ image include the pharaoh: • leading his soldiers into battle and returning in victory • attacking the enemy while riding in his chariot • wearing war regalia, for example, the blue war crown or other pharaonic headdress • depicted larger than life-size, holding one or more of the enemy with one hand, while he clubs their brains out with a mace (also known as ‘smiting the enemy’) • in the guise of a sphinx, trampling his enemies underfoot • offering the spoils of war to the god Amun, the inspiration for his victory. FIGURE 21 Thutmose III smiting the enemy Another aspect of the warrior pharaoh image that developed over time was the pharaoh as elite athlete and sportsman, a perfect physical specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO WAS WHO AMONG the ROYAL MUMMIES by Edward F
    THE oi.uchicago.edu ORIENTAL INSTITUTE NEWS & NOTES NO. 144 WINTER 1995 ©THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO WHO WAS WHO AMONG THE ROYAL MUMMIES By Edward F. Wente, Professor, The Oriental Institute and the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations The University of Chicago had an early association with the mummies. With the exception of the mummy of Thutmose IV, royal mummies, albeit an indirect one. On the Midway in the which a certain Dr. Khayat x-rayed in 1903, and the mummy area in front of where Rockefeller Chapel now stands there of Amenhotep I, x-rayed by Dr. Douglas Derry in the 1930s, was an exhibit of the 1893 World Columbian Exposition known none of the other royal mummies had ever been radiographed as "A Street in Cairo." To lure visitors into the pavilion a plac­ until Dr. James E. Harris, Chairman of the Department of Orth­ ard placed at the entrance displayed an over life-sized odontics at the University of Michigan, and his team from the photograph of the "Mummy of Rameses II, the Oppressor of University of Michigan and Alexandria University began x­ the Israelites." Elsewhere on the exterior of the building were raying the royal mummies in the Cairo Museum in 1967. The the words "Royal Mummies Found Lately in Egypt," giving inadequacy of Smith's approach in determining age at death the impression that the visitor had already been hinted at by would be seeing the genuine Smith in his catalogue, where mummies, which only twelve he indicated that the x-ray of years earlier had been re­ Thutmose IV suggested that moved by Egyptologists from a this king's age at death might cache in the desert escarpment have been older than his pre­ of Deir el-Bahri in western vious visual examination of the Thebes.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity and Innovation in the Reign of Hatshepsut
    iii OCCASIONAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE THEBAN WORKSHOP Creativity and Innovation in the Reign of Hatshepsut edited by José M. Galán, Betsy M. Bryan, and Peter F. Dorman Papers from the Theban Workshop 2010 2014 studies in ancient ORientaL civiLizatiOn • numbeR 69 THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE of THE UNIVERSITY of CHICAgo chicagO • IllinOis v Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................. vii Program of the Theban Workshop, 2010 Preface, José M. Galán, SCIC, Madrid ........................................................................... viii PAPERS FROM THE THEBAN WORKSHOP, 2010 1. Innovation at the Dawn of the New Kingdom. Peter F. Dorman, American University of Beirut...................................................... 1 2. The Paradigms of Innovation and Their Application to the Early New Kingdom of Egypt. Eberhard Dziobek, Heidelberg and Leverkusen....................................................... 7 3. Worldview and Royal Discourse in the Time of Hatshepsut. Susanne Bickel, University of Basel ............................................................... 21 4. Hatshepsut at Karnak: A Woman under God’s Commands. Luc Gabolde, CNRS (UMR 5140) .................................................................. 33 5. How and Why Did Hatshepsut Invent the Image of Her Royal Power? Dimitri Laboury, University of Liège .............................................................. 49 6. Hatshepsut and cultic Revelries in the new Kingdom. Betsy M. Bryan, The Johns Hopkins
    [Show full text]
  • Hatshepsut), Triumphant, Repeated Honors to Me
    Genealogy of the early 18th Dynasty 17th Dynasty (Second Intermediate Period) 18th Dynasty (New Kingdom) = Red indicates people who ruled as kings Autobiography of Turi, King’s Son of Kush (viceroy) under Thutmose I: the coronaon decree "This royal [decree is brought] to inform you that My Majesty, may he live, prosper and be healthy, has arisen as King of Upper and Lower Egypt upon the Horus throne of the living, with no equal in eternity. My Jtulary has been composed as: `Horus Mighty Bull, Beloved of Truth, He of the Two Ladies, Risen with the fiery serpent, Great of Strength, Horus of Gold, Perfect of Years. He who makes hearts live, King of Upper and Lower Egypt Aakheperkara Son of Ra Thutmose living forever and eternity.' Now you are to have divine offerings presented to the temples of the Southern Reach of ElephanJne in doing what is praised upon the life-prosperity-health of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt Aakheperkara given life, and you are to have oaths taken in the name of My Majesty, may he live, prosper and be healthy, born of the King's Mother Seniseneb, in health. This is sent to inform you of this, and that the Royal domain flourishes and prospers. Year 1, month 3 of winter, day 21, day of the feast of the coronaon." Thutmose I at Karnak (added 5th pylon) Yet more from Ahmose son of Ibana: Then his majesty (Thutmosis I) was informed that the Nubian…. At this, his majesty became enraged like a leopard. His majesty shot, and his first arrow pierced the chest of that foe.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun's Family
    Supplementary Online Content Hawass Z, Gad YZ, Ismail S, et al. Ancestry and pathology in King Tutankhamun’s family. JAMA. 2010;303(7):638-647. eAppendix. Details of Methods, Results, and Comment eFigure 1. Comparison of El Amarna Art (circa 1353-1323 BC) With the Remains of Akhenaten (KV55) eFigure 2. Variant STEVOR Gene Sequences Obtained From DNA Extracts of Tutankhamun eFigure 3. Grave Goods Found in Tutankhamun’s Tomb KV62 This supplemental material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 eAppendix. Details of Methods, Results, and Comment METHODS Radiology. The scanning parameters used were KV=130 effective MAS ranged from 23 to 63. Pitch ranged from 0.83 to 1.8. FOV from 350 to 500. Slice thickness 0.6 to 1.25 mm. Reconstruction 0.4 to 0.8 mm. The scan took a few minutes and produced thousands of images. The refinement process was undertaken using 3D reconstruction, real-time extraction with saggital, coronal, and axial planes as well as oblique planes. The use of soft tissue kernel and high- resolution kernel supplemented with different ranges of window width and level followed by maximum intensity projection, multiplanner reconstruction (MIP, MPR) were carried out. In a second step, surface shaded display (SSD) with different threshold values was performed. Colored mapping of different volumes using the volume rendering technique (VRT) was also applied (online interactive feature). Molecular Genetics: Good Working Practice, Data Authentication. A dedicated ancient DNA laboratory was established in the basement of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
    [Show full text]
  • Rate the Pharaohs
    Rate the Pharaohs Menes (ruled 3407 BC – 3346 BC) (Mee-nees) Ancient tradition credits Menes with having united Upper and Lower Egypt into in a single kingdom and becoming the first pharaoh of unified Egypt. According to Manetho (an Egyptian historian who live in around 300 BCE), Menes reigned for 62 years. Menes built the city of Memphis. King Menes built Memphis on the Nile's flood plain. In order to have it on the flood plain and still avoid the water overflow, he constructed a gigantic dam that would redirect the annual floods from the Nile. Menes established worship of the gods in his new city, as well as manners and styles of decoration and sophisticated tastes. He taught the residents of Memphis to cover their tables and couches with beautiful cloths. These dramatic changes to life seemed almost as if they were a gift of the gods. Of course, not all Egyptians could live this way as they were poor and could not afford the expensive tastes of Menes. Menes built the temple of Ptah, who was considered the potter and craftsman of the gods. It was believed that Ptah dreamt creation through his heart, and when he spoke it, the world came into being. Having Upper and Lower Egypt united and further establishing its culture, King Menes and his subjects accumulated surpluses of food. This no doubt, had a huge influence upon the advancement of technology and government that continued for approximately 1,000 years. The trade of food throughout the Mediterranean brought yet more wealth to Memphis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Ancient Egypt
    034-037 Ch2 CO-824133 3/9/04 4:37 PM Page 34 Ancient Egypt 34–35 Brian Lawrence/Image State Sphinx and pyramid in Giza, Egypt 3500 B.C. 2500 B.C. 1500 B.C. 500 B.C. c. 3100 B.C. c. 2540 B.C. c. 1500 B.C. 728 B.C. Narmer Great Queen Piye of Kush unites Pyramid at Hatshepsut defeats Egypt Giza built reigns Egyptians 034-037 Ch2 CO-824133 7/14/04 6:50 PM Page 35 Chapter Overview Visit Chapter Preview jat.glencoe.com for a preview While the people of Mesopotamia fought wars, people of Chapter 2. along Africa’s Nile River formed rich and powerful civiliza- tions. Read this chapter to learn how the people of Egypt and Kush built large monuments that still stand today. View the Chapter 2 video in the World History: Journey Across Time Video Program. The Nile Valley The fertile land along the great Nile River supported the Egyptian civilization. Egypt’s Old Kingdom During the Old Kingdom period, Egyptians built cities, great pyramids, and a strong kingdom. The Egyptian Empire Many changes occurred during Egypt’s Middle and New Kingdoms. It expanded into a great empire as art, literature, and architecture blossomed. The Civilization of Kush South of Egypt a new civilization arose called Kush. Kushites adopted Egyptian ways and eventually conquered Egypt itself. Organizing Information Make this foldable to help you organize the key events and ideas from ancient Egypt and Kush. Step 1 Stack Step 2 Fold down the top edges of the paper to Reading and Writing two sheets of form four tabs.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnak: Development of the Temple of Amun-Ra الكرنك: تطور معبد آمون رع
    KARNAK: DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEMPLE OF AMUN-RA الكرنك: تطور معبد آمون رع Elaine A. Sullivan EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Geography University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Sullivan 2010, Karnak: Development of the Temple of Amun-Ra. UEE. Full Citation: Sullivan, Elaine A., 2010, Karnak: Development of the Temple of Amun-Ra. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002564qn 1132 Version 1, September 2010 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002564qn KARNAK: DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEMPLE OF AMUN-RA الكرنك: تطور معبد آمون رع Elaine A. Sullivan Karnak, die Baugeschichte des Amuntempels Karnak, le développement du temple d’Amon-Ra The temple of Amun-Ra at Karnak (Luxor) experienced over 1,500 years of construction, destruction, renovation, and expansion. Here we provide a detailed survey of the current understanding of the temple’s chronological development, based primarily on published excavation reports, as well as interpretive articles and recent discoveries at the site. على مدار أكثر من 1500 عام مر معبد آمون رع بالكرنك بمراحل من البناء، التدمير، التجديد و التوسيع. ھذه المقالة تعطي دراسة تفصيلية عن الفكر الحالي للتطور التاريخي للمعبد طبقاً لما ورد بتقارير الحفائر و أيضاً إستناداً إلى المقاﻻت التفسيرية و اﻹكتشافات ةالجديد . he ancient city of Thebes (or the Aten; north Karnak, the site of the temple Waset as it was known in of the god Montu; and main/central Karnak, T Egyptian) played an important with its temple to the god Amun-Ra.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Contribution of Prominent Officials Within Egypt and the Empire
    Role and contribution of prominent officials within Egypt and the empire While the pharaoh had responsibility for the inspiration and direction of internal and foreign affairs, it was his officials who carried out pharaonic policy and ensured its success. Initially it was the military officials who played the most prominent roles. Men such as Ahmose son of Ebana and Ahmose Pennekhbet were not only instrumental in pharaohs’ victories, they recorded their contributions in their tomb biographies, thereby leaving invaluable evidence for scholars reconstructing the expulsion and its aftermath. Civil administration As the ‘empire’ grew, a vast bureaucracy of civil officials became necessary to administer both internal and external policy. At the head of the civil administration stood the vizier who was directly responsible to the pharaoh for all of the branches of national government. The complexity of the New Kingdom administration required two viziers, one for the north and one for the south, although most of our evidence relates to the southern (Theban) vizier in this period. He was the chief financial officer in charge of taxation and tribute, he acted as chief judge in legal affairs and had overall responsibility for the royal building program. He also acted on behalf of the king in foreign affairs such as the reception of the annual tribute. Perhaps the best-known vizier of this period was Rekhmire who served both Thutmose III and Amenhotep II. Below the vizier were other important officials such as the overseers of the treasury, overseers of the granaries and overseers of building works and members of the provincial administration such as nomarchs and mayors.
    [Show full text]
  • History Dec 5 Post-Amarna.Pdf
    “I fall at the feet of the king, my lord, my god, my sun from the sky, 7 Times and 7 times, on the back and on the stomach” Year 12: receiving foreign tribute The succession: Two sets of royal names Ankhkheperure beloved of Akhenaten, Neferneferuaten Ankhkheperure Smenkhkare Both associated with Akhenaten: Smenkhkare on a calcite jar from the tomb of Tutankhamun with A’s cartouches followed by A.S.’s, both subsequently erased A.N. a box from the tomb of Tutankhamun and a stela from Amarna Both A.N. and A.S. also associated with Meritaten; A.S. in a scene from the tomb of Merira II at Amarna and A.N. on the box from Tut’s tomb A graffito: “Regnal year 3, 3rd month of inundation, day 10. The King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Lord of the Two Lands, Ankhkheperure beloved of Aten (?), the Son of Ra Neferneferuaten beloved of Waenre (?). Giving worship to Amun, kissing the ground to Wenennefer by the lay priest, scribe of the divine offerings of Amun in the Mansion of Akhkheperure in Thebes, Pawah… Come back to us, O lord of continuity. You were here before anything had come into being, and you will be here when they are gone…” The Aftermath: Tutankhamun, Ay, Horemheb and the restoration Amun and Tutankhamun Tutankhaten becomes Tutankhamun Tutankhamun restoration stela From the restoration stela: (titulary and epithets involving Ra, Amun-Ra, Atum, Ra-Horakhty, Ptah, Thoth, Horus, etc) …the good ruler who performs benefactions for his father and all the gods, having repaired what was ruined as a monument lasting to the length of continuity, and having repelled disorder throughout the Two Lands, so that Maat rests [in her place] as he causes falsehood to be abomination and the land to be like its primeval state.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Images in Private Tombs at Thebes in the Early Ramesside Period
    ROYAL IMAGES IN PRIVATE TOMBS AT THEBES IN THE EARLY RAMESSIDE PERIOD by GABRIELLE HEFFERNAN A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Philosophy Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham June 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Cultural memory is a relatively new area of study within Egyptology. It is, however, a key issue in the understanding of how society functioned. Important work has been done by scholars such as Assmann on the subject and this study hopes to build on that by taking the case of depictions of kings in Theban tombs, and discussing what they may tell us about the role of the king in the lives of the people. This study will focus on three types of scene; the king as a part of everyday life, the king as a historical figure, and the king as a 'divine' being. This will allow a more detailed study of how the king, and kingship, was understood by people who were not members of the royal court, or holders of high office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power Behind the Crown: Messages Worn by Three New Kingdom Egyptian Queens
    Studia Antiqua Volume 5 Number 1 Article 4 June 2007 The Power Behind the Crown: Messages Worn by Three New Kingdom Egyptian Queens Mary Abram Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua Part of the History Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Abram, Mary. "The Power Behind the Crown: Messages Worn by Three New Kingdom Egyptian Queens." Studia Antiqua 5, no. 1 (2007). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studia Antiqua by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Power Behind the Crown: Messages Worn by Three New Kingdom Egyptian Queens Mary Abram hroughout the ages and among diverse cultures, the crown has Tbeen recognized as a statement of power, honor, and high political or religious office. In the deeply symbolic society of ancient Egypt, the crowns and headdresses worn by royalty represented more than mere emblems of authority. Various symbolisms accompanied the crown’s different components. An evaluation of the crowns worn by three New Kingdom queens—Hatshepsut, Nefertiti, and Nefertari—places the pronouncement of royal status as only one of a multi-layered message. These messages even transcend traditional symbolisms of Egyptian iconography. The particular components for each crown chosen by these women actually reveal personal and political agendas. Before reviewing the life and times of these New Kingdom royal figures, however, an outline of standard wear for queens will illustrate how these three individuals conformed with or contested the norm, thus providing the first insight into their respective personalities.
    [Show full text]