Independent Inquiry Into the Georges River - Botany Bay System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Independent Inquiry Into the Georges River - Botany Bay System Independent Inquiry into the Georges River - Botany Bay System FINAL REPORT September 2001 HY RIVERS ALT C E OM H M I S S I O N Healthy Rivers Commission of New South Wales © Healthy Rivers Commission 2001 Level 18, 15 Castlereagh Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Telephone: 02 9231 2977 1800 818 369 (freecall – outside Sydney) Facsimile: 02 9232 5973 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.hrc.nsw.gov.au ISBN 0 9577268 5 6 Printed on recycled paper Foreword In finalising this Georges River - Botany Bay Inquiry, the Commission has completed the picture of river and bay health for the three river systems (the Hawkesbury Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora), that provide water to the Sydney metropolitan area. The Commission has found that the health of each of these rivers is affected, to varying degrees, by water extraction, sewage and stormwater discharge, urban and rural development. It has become clear that if river health is to be optimised whilst preserving the many uses that the catchment communities expect of their watercourses, the three river systems cannot be managed in isolation from each other. Likewise, key elements of the water cycle must be managed across the metropolitan area in an integrated way. Stormwater and sewage effluent must no longer be thought of as ‘wastewater’ but as a valuable resource and part of the total water cycle available to improve river health and ameliorate demand on supply for the wider Sydney region. The Commission has devised strategies and recommendations to improve river health, taking into account the expectations and needs of the diverse and growing community. In that context, in the Georges River - Botany Bay Inquiry, the Commission has found that there are three critical issues which must be addressed as a matter of priority if we are to secure a healthy river and bay environment. The most significant of these is the future management of the water cycle across the three river systems. In all Inquiries to date, the Commission has advocated that rivers should be managed as ‘whole systems’: in this instance, the ‘system’ incorporates those three rivers, interconnected by the operation of the metropolitan water, sewage and stormwater systems. The Government’s commitment to providing environmental flows in these rivers, coupled with its recent decision to defer construction of Welcome Reef Dam, means that demand for water must be reduced and alternate sources of supply must be harnessed if the current security of the metropolitan water supply is not to be placed at risk. In that context, future decisions about the urban water cycle must be made in an integrated manner, considering water requirements of all users, provision of environmental flows, options to reduce demand, and options for the reuse of stormwater and sewage effluent. The Commission proposes a mechanism to allow such decision-making. Recommendations include better integration of stormwater management, not just in the Georges River - Botany Bay catchment, but across the metropolitan area, and with other water, wastewater and reuse strategies. To provide that better integration, using existing institutions, the Commission recommends that Sydney Water take on greater strategic responsibility for stormwater management, while local councils manage local systems, focussing on promotion of water sensitive urban design principles. Establishment of long- term sustainable funding and partnerships between Sydney Water and local government will ensure the most cost-effective outcomes for the metropolitan area are achieved. The management of Botany Bay is the second issue that requires urgent attention. The bay is a very complex system, in terms of the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and also the political and administrative arrangements. There is a clear need for an integrated decision- making framework for the bay to deal with this complexity and devise strategies to sustain the competing interests of industry, commercial activity, national and international FINAL REPORT - Independent Inquiry into the Georges River – Botany Bay System i Healthy Rivers Commission of New South Wales transport, residents and the environment. The Commission recommends that the State establish an integrating framework with unambiguous support from the three levels of government and key stakeholders. That should facilitate the development of a strategic plan for Botany Bay which would identify agreed goals, strategies to achieve them, and the context against which new development is assessed. The third critical issue in the Georges River - Botany Bay system is the continued protection of remaining natural areas within the catchment that contribute to river health in terms of aquatic and terrestrial habitat, water quality and visual and recreational amenity at both the local and catchment scale. The Commission recommends mechanisms to protect these areas in future. I thank all of those citizens, council officers, agency staff, and independent experts who have participated in the Inquiry process, contributed to the Commission’s appreciation of the complexity of the issues, and assisted in devising strategies to harness the many opportunities to improve river and bay health. Peter J Crawford Commissioner ii FINAL REPORT - Independent Inquiry into the Georges River – Botany Bay System Healthy Rivers Commission of New South Wales The Georges River - Botany Bay catchment P ros pe ct Ck Co k oks a C Riv att er l am Marrickville a br Liverpool an Ca C a dr Bankstown an ex Al Botany G eorges River Sutherland Kurnell r e iv R es rg r o e e v G i R Campbelltown ra o n ro o W Dam N k C s 0 8km e r a Waterfall H ’ O FINAL REPORT - Independent Inquiry into the Georges River – Botany Bay System iii Healthy Rivers Commission of New South Wales Table of Contents PART A CONTEXT............................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 3 Key outcomes...............................................................................................................................4 Implications of Government decisions on related Inquiries .................................................6 PART B RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................... 13 River flows and water supply................................................................................. 14 RF 1 Water management in the Sydney metropolitan area ..........................................14 RF 2 Environmental flow releases from Woronora Dam ..............................................17 RF 3 Provision of fish passage..........................................................................................20 Stormwater and sewage........................................................................................ 21 WM 1 Improved institutional arrangements for wastewater management..................21 WM 2 Integrated stormwater management at the local level .........................................24 WM 3 Stormwater management by public land owners .................................................26 Botany Bay ............................................................................................................. 28 BM 1 Integrated management framework for Botany Bay ............................................28 BM 2 Accountability for ‘resource management’ within Botany Bay...........................32 BM 3 Assessment procedures for activities within Botany Bay and surrounds .........33 BM 4 Protection of lands on the Kurnell Peninsula ........................................................35 BM 5 Protection and management of the southern shores.............................................37 BM 6 Preservation of wetlands, western shores ..............................................................38 BM 7 Management of Botany Aquifer, northern shores.................................................40 River corridors ......................................................................................................... 42 RC 1 Protection of urban streams......................................................................................42 Natural areas .......................................................................................................... 46 NA 1 Protection of remaining natural lands, including those currently under Commonwealth ownership and management ......................................................46 NA 2 Management of longwall coal mining ....................................................................50 NA 3 Clay mining in upland swamps...............................................................................53 NA 4 Management of Crown land on urban fringe, including that reverting to Aboriginal ownership that was degraded under prior Crown ownership .......55 NA 5 Provision of 'offsets' and 'trade-offs'........................................................................57 iv FINAL REPORT - Independent Inquiry into the Georges River – Botany Bay System Healthy Rivers Commission of New South Wales River and bay health objectives........................................................................... 60 RHO 1 Environmental values................................................................................................60 RHO 2 River corridor objectives ...........................................................................................66 RHO 3 River
Recommended publications
  • Dragonfly Survey Report
    Moorebank Precinct West Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Part 4, Division 4.1, State Significant Development September 2016 TACTICAL GROUP MOOREBANK PRECINCT WEST Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Author Adam Costenoble Checker Kate Carroll Approver Ketan Patel Report No 001 Date 26/09/2016 Revision Text Final This report has been prepared for Tactical Group in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for AA009335 dated July 2016. Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. REVISIONS Prepared Approved Revision Date Description by by Adam 001 26/09/16 For submission to DPI Fisheries Ketan Patel Costenoble V i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Aims of this Report ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Consultation .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cooks River Valley Association Inc. PO Box H150, Hurlstone Park NSW 2193 E: [email protected] W: ABN 14 390 158 512
    Cooks River Valley Association Inc. PO Box H150, Hurlstone Park NSW 2193 E: [email protected] W: www.crva.org.au ABN 14 390 158 512 8 August 2018 To: Ian Naylor Manager, Civic and Executive Support Leichhardt Service Centre Inner West Council 7-15 Wetherill Street Leichhardt NSW 2040 Dear Ian Re: Petition on proposal to establish a Pemulwuy Cooks River Trail The Cooks River Valley Association (CRVA) would like to submit the attached petition to establish a Pemulwuy Cooks River Trail to the Inner West Council. The signatures on the petition were mainly collected at two events that were held in Marrickville during April and May 2018. These events were the Anzac Day Reflection held on 25 April 2018 in Richardson’s Lookout – Marrickville Peace Park and the National Sorry Day Walk along the Cooks River via a number of Indigenous Interpretive Sites on 26 May 2018. The purpose of the petition is to creatively showcase the history and culture of the local Aboriginal community along the Cooks River and to publicly acknowledge the role of Pemulwuy as “father of local Aboriginal resistance”. The action petitioned for was expressed in the following terms: “We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge Inner West Council in conjunction with Council’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Reference Group (A&TSIRG) to designate the walk between the Aboriginal Interpretive Sites along the Cooks River parks in Marrickville as the Pemulwuy Trail and produce an information leaflet to explain the sites and the Aboriginal connection to the Cooks River (River of Goolay’yari).” A total of 60 signatures have been collected on the petition attached.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to Australia's Faunal Extinction Crisis Inquiry
    Supplementary to my submission of the 5th September 2018 I would appreciate it if the panel would take the following information into account most of the local information has been taken from the web site: Campbelltown Koala Research and Database.com. which is Report undertaken by Prof. Robert Close and his team over a 27 year period.. www.campbelltown research and database.com 13th August 2019 Submission to Australia’s Faunal Extinction Crisis Inquiry Patricia Durman 28th July 2019 Thank you for allowing us to submit a submission into the state of koalas in NSW, my knowledge is mainly restricted to the local koala population and I have aimed this submission to the protection of these animals, but regard all native animals including koalas as part of the ecosystem that is required to keep the planet healthy. It is unfortunate that unless the panel has the power to delay development until they have made their report and it has been accepted by the government the Campbelltown koala population will have been seriously endangered by subdivision and the installation of new roads. I have referred to the koala population as the Campbelltown population, but this, of course, refers to all koalas living in the South West region of Sydney including Sutherland. HISTORY Although there were a few extinctions of native flora and fauna once the Aboriginal people had landed in Australia 40,000 years ago, perhaps even longer in the Cape York region, it wasn’t until Europeans arrived and cleared vast areas of bushland that the extinction of native animals escalated and in only 200 years we have become the continent with the most amount of extinction in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • FINED out a Practical Guide for People Having Problems with Fines What Is FINED out All About? FINED out Is a Practical Guide to the NSW Fines System
    FINED OUT A practical guide for people having problems with fines What is FINED OUT all about? FINED OUT is a practical guide to the NSW fines system. It provides information about how to deal with fines and contact information for services that can help people with their fines. 5th edition, March 2021. Produced by Legal Aid NSW Design and production: ARMEDIA Illustrations: Carolyn Ridsdale © Inner City Legal Centre, Redfern Legal Centre and the State of NSW through the Legal Aid Commission of NSW, 2021. You may copy, print, distribute, download and otherwise freely deal with this work for a non-profit purpose provided that you attribute Inner City Legal Centre, Redfern Legal Centre and Legal Aid NSW as the owners. To reproduce or modify the work for any other purpose, you need to ask for and be given permission by Legal Aid NSW or Inner City Legal Centre. DISCLAIMER: This guide applies only to residents and the law of NSW. The information in this resource is general and is not intended to be specific legal advice on any matter. If you have a specific legal problem, you should consult a lawyer. To the extent permissible by law, Inner City Legal Centre, Redfern Legal Centre and Legal Aid NSW disclaim all liability for anything contained in this resource and any use you make of it. First published in 2006 by Legal Aid NSW. ISBN 978-0-9806128-9-9 If you are hearing/speech impaired, you can communicate with us by calling the National Relay Service (NRS) on 133 677 TIS provides free interpreters if you do not speak English.
    [Show full text]
  • Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program
    Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program Volume 1 Data Report 2019-20 Commercial-in-Confidence Sydney Water 1 Smith Street, Parramatta, NSW Australia 2150 PO Box 399 Parramatta NSW 2124 Report version: STSIMP Data Report 2019-20 Volume 1 final © Sydney Water 2020 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed requires permission from Sydney Water. Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program | Vol 1 Data Report 2019-20 Page | i Executive summary Background Sydney Water operates 23 wastewater treatment systems and each system has an Environment Protection Licence (EPL) regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). Each EPL specifies the minimum performance standards and monitoring that is required. The Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program (STSIMP) commenced in 2008 to satisfy condition M5.1a of our EPLs. The results are reported to the NSW EPA every year. The STSIMP aims to monitor the environment within Sydney Water’s area of operations to determine general trends in water quality over time, monitor Sydney Water’s performance and to determine where Sydney Water’s contribution to water quality may pose a risk to environmental ecosystems and human health. The format and content of 2019-20 Data Report predominantly follows four earlier reports (2015-16 to 2018-19). Sydney Water’s overall approach to monitoring (design and method) is consistent with the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC 2000 and ANZG 2018) guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 – Maps Part 5
    LEGEND LGAs Study area FAIRFIELD LGA ¹ 8.12a 8.12b 8.12c 8.12d BANKSTOWN LGA 8.12e 8.12f 8.12i ROCKDALE LGA HURSTVILLE LGA 8.12v 8.12g 8.12h 8.12j 8.12k LIVERPOOL LGA NORTH BOTANY BAY CITY OF KOGARAH 8.12n 8.12o 8.12l 8.12m 8.12r 8.12s 8.12p 8.12q SUTHERLAND SHIRE 8.12t 8.12u COORDINATE SCALE 0500 1,000 2,000 PAGE SIZE FIG NO. 8.12 FIGURE TITLE Overview of Site Specific Maps DATE 17/08/2010 SYSTEM 1:70,000 A3 © SMEC Australia Pty Ltd 2010. Meters MGA Z56 All Rights Reserved Data Source - Vegetation: The Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment LOCATION I:Projects\3001765 - Georges River Estuary Process Management Authority Area (Draft) (2009). NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change PROJECT NO. 3001765 PROJECT TITLE Georges River Estuary Process Study CREATED BY C. Thompson Study\009 DATA\GIS\ArcView Files\Working files and Water. Hurstville, NSW Australia. LEGEND Weed Hotspot Priority Areas Study Area LGAs Riparian Vegetation & EEC (Moderate Priority) Riparian Vegetation & EEC (High Priority) ¹ Seagrass (High Priority) Saltmarsh (High Priority) Estuarine Reedland (Moderate Priority) Mangrove (Moderate Priority) Swamp Oak (Moderate Priority) Mooring Areas River Area Reserves River Access Cherrybrook Park Area could be used for educational purposes due to high public usage of the wharf and boat launch facilities. Educate on responsible use of watercraft, value of estuarine and foreshore vegetation and causes and outcomes of foreshore FAIRFIELD LGA erosion. River Flat Eucalypt Forest Cabramatta Creek (Liverpool LGA) - WEED HOT SPOT Dominated by Balloon Vine (Cardiospermum grandiflorum) and River Flat Eucalypt Forest Wild Tobacco Bush (Solanum mauritianum).
    [Show full text]
  • Club Veedub Sydney. December 2014
    NQ629.2220994/5 Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au Merry Christmas to all our members! December 2014 IN THIS BUMPER CHRISTMAS ISSUE: Eastern Creek Marshals Marques in the Park Boris’ Picnic Day Snowy Mountains 1000 Pie In the Sky Run Eat St Parramatta 1956 Chicago Run Plus lots more... Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au A member of the NSW Council of Motor Clubs. Also affiliated with CAMS. ZEITSCHRIFT - December 2014 - Page 1 Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au Club VeeDub Sydney Club VeeDub membership. Membership of Club VeeDub Sydney is open to all Committee 2014-15. Volkswagen owners. The cost is $45 for 12 months. President: Steve Carter 0490 020 338 [email protected] Monthly meetings. Monthly Club VeeDub meetings are held at the Vice President: Craig Adams 0404 184 893 Greyhound Social Club Ltd., 140 Rookwood Rd, Yagoona, on [email protected] the third Thursday of each month, from 7:30 pm. All our members, friends and visitors are most welcome. Secretary and: Norm Elias 0421 303 544 Membership: [email protected] Correspondence. Assist. Secretary: David Birchall (02) 9534 4825 Club VeeDub Sydney [email protected] PO Box 1340 Camden NSW 2570 Treasurer: Martin Fox 0411 331 121 [email protected] Our magazine. Editor: Phil Matthews 0412 786 335 Zeitschrift (German for ‘magazine’) is published monthly [email protected] by Club VeeDub Sydney Inc. Members with email details receive Assistant Editor: Lily Matthews Zeitschrift as a full-colour PDF from our website. We welcome all letters and contributions of general VW interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrobrachium Intermedium in Southeastern Australia: Spatial Heterogeneity and the Effects of Species of Seagrass
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 75: 239-249, 1991 Published September 11 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Demographic patterns of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium in southeastern Australia: spatial heterogeneity and the effects of species of seagrass Charles A. Gray* School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW. Australia ABSTRACT. The effects of species of seagrass (Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis) on spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the demography of estuarine populations of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium across 65 km of the Sydney region, southeastern Australia, were examined. Three estuaries were sampled in 1983 and 1984 to assess the magnitude of intra- and inter- estuary variability in demographic characteristics among populations. Species of seagrass had no effect on the demographic patterns of populations: differences in the magnitude and directions of change in abundances, recruitment, reproductive characteristics, size structures and growth were as great among populations within each species of seagrass as those between the 2 seagrasses Abiotic factors, such as the location of a meadow in relation to depth of water and distance offshore, and the interactions of these factors with recruiting larvae are hypothesised to have greater influence than the species of seagrass in determining the distribution and abundance of these prawns. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in demography was similar across all spatial scales sampled: among meadows (50 m to 3 km apart) in an estuary and among meadows in all 3 estuaries (10 to 65 km apart). Variability in demographic processes among populations in the Sydney region was most likely due to stochastic factors extrinsic to the seagrasses then~selves.I conclude that the demography of seagrass-dwelling estuarine populations of M.
    [Show full text]
  • “Are New Developments Cleaning up the Cooks River Or Creating More Problems?”
    Capacity Building and training needs analysis: Stage 1 Report “Are new developments cleaning up the Cooks River or creating more problems?” FINAL Brian Keogh 24 June, 2016 Report Basis This report partially fulfils two Cobalt59 requirements: It provides a baseline evaluation of the capacity of the Cooks River councils within a critical systems area (planning assessment in relation to water management). It provides a training assessment that will assist in developing this capacity. Page 1 of 46 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 3 State Environment Protection Policies (SEPP) .................................................................. 3 Local Environment Plans (LEP) ......................................................................................... 3 Development Control Plans (DCP) .................................................................................... 4 Training Recommendations ............................................................................................... 7 2. Capacity Assessment – Systems ................................................................................... 9 3. Background .................................................................................................................. 11 4. Planning Overview ....................................................................................................... 13 5. NSW State Environment Protection Policies (SEPPs) .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat
    REDUCING THE IMPACT OF WEIRS ON AQUATIC HABITAT NSW DETAILED WEIR REVIEW REPORT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST SYDNEY METROPOLITAN CMA REGION Published by NSW Department of Primary Industries. © State of New South Wales 2006. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in an unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal use or for non-commercial use within your organisation provided due credit is given to the author and publisher. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Manager Publishing, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2006). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of NSW Department of Primary Industries or the user‘s independent adviser. This report should be cited as: NSW Department of Primary Industries (2006). Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat - New South Wales Detailed Weir Review. Sydney Metropolitan CMA region. Report to the New South Wales Environmental Trust. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Flemington, NSW. ISBN: 0 7347 1753 9 (New South Wales Detailed Weir Review) ISBN: 978 0 7347 1833 4 (Sydney Metropolitan CMA region) Cover photos: Cob-o-corn Weir, Cob-o-corn Creek, Northern Rivers CMA (upper left); Stroud Weir, Karuah River, Hunter/Central Rivers CMA (upper right); Mollee Weir, Namoi River, Namoi CMA (lower left); and Hartwood Weir, Billabong Creek, Murray CMA (lower right).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Paper (Pdf)
    Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF SPREAD FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF THE CORE ALLIGATOR WEED INFESTATIONS IN AUSTRALIA - TAKING STOCK FINAL REPORT October 2008 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia- ‘Taking Stock’ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR ISSUE OF DOCUMENTS Report Title: Final Report Document Status: Final Report Document No: NE210541-2008 Date of Issue: 10/10/2008 Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management Client: Department of Agriculture, Project Title: of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia - Fisheries & Forestry Taking Stock Comments: Position Name Signature Date Prepared by: Principal Consultant Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 DAFF, CMAs, DPI, Peer Review by: LGAs and various Given in acknowledgements July-August 2008 others For further information on this report, contact: Name: Dr. Nimal Chandrasena Title: Principal Ecologist, Ecowise Environmental Address: 24 Lemko Place, Penrith, NSW 2750 Phone: 4721 3477 Mobile: 0408 279 604 E-mail: [email protected] Document Revision Control Version Description of Revision Person Making Issue Date Approval 1 Working Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 27 July 2008 2 Final Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 © Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd This Report and the information, ideas, concepts, methodologies, technologies and other material remain the intellectual property of Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the Client named above and is to be used only for the purposes for which it was commissioned. No warranty is given as to its suitability for any other purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette No 164 of Friday 23 April 2021
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE – 4 September 2020 Government Gazette of the State of New South Wales Number 164–Electricity and Water Friday, 23 April 2021 The New South Wales Government Gazette is the permanent public record of official NSW Government notices. It also contains local council, non-government and other notices. Each notice in the Government Gazette has a unique reference number that appears in parentheses at the end of the notice and can be used as a reference for that notice (for example, (n2019-14)). The Gazette is compiled by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and published on the NSW legislation website (www.legislation.nsw.gov.au) under the authority of the NSW Government. The website contains a permanent archive of past Gazettes. To submit a notice for gazettal, see the Gazette page. By Authority ISSN 2201-7534 Government Printer NSW Government Gazette No 164 of 23 April 2021 DATA LOGGING AND TELEMETRY SPECIFICATIONS 2021 under the WATER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) REGULATION 2018 I, Kaia Hodge, by delegation from the Minister administering the Water Management Act 2000, pursuant to clause 10 of Schedule 8 to the Water Management (General) Regulation 2018 (the Regulation) approve the following data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment. Dated this 15 day of April 2021. KAIA HODGE Executive Director, Regional Water Strategies Department of Planning, Industry and Environment By delegation Explanatory note This instrument is made under clause 10 (1) of Schedule 8 to the Regulation. The object of this instrument is to approve data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment that holders of water supply work approvals, water access licences and Water Act 1912 licences and entitlements that are subject to the mandatory metering equipment condition must comply with.
    [Show full text]