Populations of Emmer Wheat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Populations of Emmer Wheat Heredity66 (1991) 251 —257 Received 25 June 1990 Genetical Society of Great Britain Herbicide response polymorphism in wild populations of emmer wheat J. W. SNAPE, E. NEVO,* B. B. PARKER, D. LECKIE & A. MORGUNOV Cambridge Laboratory, JI Centre for Plant Science Research, Colrey Lane, Norwich NR4 9UJ, UK and * Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mt Carmel, Haifa 31999, Israel Theresponses of wild populations of emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides), from different eco- geographical areas of Israel, to three herbicides, difenzoquat, chiortoluron and metoxuron, commonly used on cultivated wheats, were studied. Although cultivated wheats are polymorphic for a response to difenzoquat, all families of all populations of the wild species were resistant. The species was, however, polymorphic for response to both chiortoluron and metoxuron. In addition, there appeared to be differentiation between populations in the frequencies of resistant and sus- ceptible morphs for these herbicides. There was also a close correspondence between the responses of individual families to chiortoluron and metoxuron, which suggests a common genetic control. The implications of these findings for understanding the evolution of herbicide resistance, and for developing strategies for breeding for resistance in the cultivated species are discussed. Keywords:emmerwheat, herbicides, polymorphisms. Introduction wheat, Gale & Miller, 1987). Finally, if no variation Theuse of effective and environmentally safe herbi- exists within related species then the techniques of cides is an important component of maintaining high genetic engineering must be used to introduce genes and stable agricultural production. Not infrequently, from wider biological sources including other plant however, new varieties of crop species are susceptible species or bacteria (Oxtoby & Hughes, 1989). to environmentally acceptable and/or widely used Wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides) is a chemicals for which resistance would be desirable. tetraploid species which is a progenitor of both durum Consequently there is, and will continue to be, a wheats, Triticum durum and bread wheats, Triticum recurring need to introduce herbicide resistance genes aestivum. This species has been shown to be highly into plant breeding programmes as new safer herbi- polymorphic for major gene variation and also highly cides are developed and as weed spectra change. variable for quantitative characters (Nevo et a!., 1984; For any particular crop species the available sources Nevo, 1987, 1988; Nevo & Beiles, 1989). Much of this of genes for herbicide resistance will depend on the variation appears to have an adaptive significance for types of herbicides used for weed control and their the species, and in addition, it can be an important mode of action. A crop series may indeed itself be source of genetic variation for improvement of the polymorphic for responses, as, for example, wheat is cultivated species. As the species is already demonstra- for response to some phenylurea herbicides (Snape & tively variable for a wide range of characteristics, it is of Parker, 1988). In this case, the introduction of resis- interest to examine whether it could be a source of tance is straightforward by utilizing conventional variation for characters not yet examined, such as methods for sexual hybridization in backcrossing pro- resistance to widely used herbicides to which the grammes. If such variation does not exist within the cultivated species are polymorphic or uniformly species then alternative technologies must be susceptible. The present experiments were initiated, employed. As a first step the responses of related, wild therefore, to examine this possibility by studying the species can be examined. If resistance exists in these, response of wild populations of emmer wheat from then the techniques of interspecific hybridization and different ecogeographical areas of Israel to three chromosome engineering can be used to introgress widely used herbicides of cultivated wheat, difenzo- genes for resistance into the crop (see for example in quat, chiortoluron, and metoxuron, to which the 251 252 J. W. SNAPE etal. cultivated wheats display herbicide response poly- field under natural conditions or in a growth room morphisms. under controlled conditions. Field experiments were grown in 1986, 1987 and Materials and methods 1988. Each experiment consisted of a random block design where individual families were represented by microplot rows of five plants. The numbers of repli- Populations studied cates of each family varied depending on the avail- Seventeen populations, taken as representatives of ability of seed, from 1 to 4. Control plots of known different ecogeographic regions of Israel, were chosen resistant or susceptible varieties of bread wheat were for study. These populations were a subset of a much randomized between the experimental families. larger study of genetic variation in T dicoccoides of the The experiments were sown either in the autumn or Middle East region (Nevo & Beiles, 1989). In the late winter and sprayed with the appropriate herbicide experiments each population was represented by a in late spring when the majority of plants had reached sample of families, where each family consisted of the the 4—5 leaf stage, and when weather conditions were progeny produced by the controlled self-pollination of appropriate. Difenzoquat was sprayed at a dose rate of individual plants collected in the wild. In all, 336 2kg ha1 active ingredient (a.i.), equivalent to twice the separate families were tested. recommended dose. Chlortoluron and metoxuron were also sprayed at dose rates twice that recom- mended for farmers, namely 5.5 kg a.i. ha-' and 8.25 Herbicidesused kg a.i. ha ,respectively.These doses were chosen on Threeherbicides commonly used for weed control in the results of previous experiments, which showed that crops of cultivated bread and durum wheat were they gave maximum differentiation between resistant examined. First, two phenylurea herbicides, chlor- and susceptible genotypes. Individual plants of each toluron [3-( 3-chloro-p-tolyl)- 1, 1 -dimethylurea] and plot were scored for response 3—4 weeks after applica- metoxuron [3-( 3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl)- 1,1 -di- tion. methylurea]. These are widely used for the control of Growth-room experiments were carried out under annual grass and broad-leaved weeds of wheat and simulated day conditions of 16 h light at 20°C and 8 h barley. Variation in the tolerance of bread wheat dark at 15°C. Initially, seed from each family was germi- varieties to chiortoluron and metoxuron has been nated in Petri dishes and then transplanted into 10-cm reported (van Heile et al., 1970), and Snape & Parker pots containing John limes Number 1 potting compost. (1988) showed that the polymorphism for response to Between 4 and 10 plants from each family were sown, chioroluron is controlled by a single major gene locus together with appropriate controls. All pots were then on chromosome 6B. It is of interest, therefore, to individually randomized for each experiment in one examine whether the wild progenitor species is poly- large block. When the majority of plants had reached morphic or whether the polymorphism arose during the 4—5 leaf stage they were removed from the growth cultivation. room and sprayed with the appropriate herbicide at the Difenzoquat [1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenylpyrazolium] same concentrations used for the field experiments. is used to control wild oat species in wheat, barley and They were then replaced and rerandomized. Individual rye. Again, differential responses are exhibited within plants were scored for response 3 weeks after applica- bread wheat and have been shown to be controlled by tion. variation at a major gene locus on chromosome 2B In both environments, field and growth room, quali- (Snape et al., 1987). However, varieties of durum tative (resistant or susceptible) scores were taken, rela- wheat appear to be almost uniformly susceptible to this tive to the performance of the controls, as well as a herbicide and only one resistant variety has been found quantitative score of damage, on a 1—9 scale. A score among a sample of world varieties (Leckie, 1989). It is of 1 indicated no perceivable effect of the herbicide of interest therefore to examine whether resistance and a score of 9 severe damage or plant death. In most exists in the wild progenitor species or evolved during experiments it was possible to classify individual cultivation of the bread wheats. families unambiguously and qualitatively as being uniformly resistant, intermediate, or susceptible, or segregating relative to the bread wheat controls. Experimentaltechniques Generally, resistant families correlated with quantita- Totest the responses to all three herbicides, individual tive scores of 1—3, intermediate as 4—7, and susceptible plants for each population were grown either in the as 8—9. HERBICIDE RESPONSES IN WILD EMMER WHEAT 253 Results tions appeared homogenous for resistant genotypes. This result is surprising in view of the almost uniform Response to difenzoquat susceptibility previously observed in tests of cultivated durum wheat varieties (Leckie, 1989). It appears, Totest the responses to difenzoquat, a single experi- ment was grown in the field in 1986. This contained a therefore, that this wild species may be monomorphic sample of 157 families, representatives of 17 different for the resistance allele at the locus for response to populations, together with
Recommended publications
  • Observations on the Malting of Ancient Wheats: Einkorn, Emmer and Spelt
    fermentation Article Observations on the Malting of Ancient Wheats: Einkorn, Emmer and Spelt Alice Fujita, Senay Simsek and Paul B. Schwarz * Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA; [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (S.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-701-231-7732 Received: 25 November 2020; Accepted: 10 December 2020; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: There have been tremendous marketing efforts and consumer interest in the so-called ancient grains. Einkorn, emmer and spelt, which are sometimes referred to as ancient wheats, are frequently included in this category, and have gained some attention among brewers. The objective of the current study was to compare the malting behavior and quality of einkorn, emmer and spelt cultivars obtained from the same growing environment. Aside from standard malt quality traits, the levels of β-amylase, protease, xylanase, wort arabinoxylans and wort phenolic acids were measured. While protein levels of the samples were higher (11.4–14.0%) than normally selected for wheat malt, the results indicated that malts of acceptable quality in terms of extract and amylolytic activity can be prepared from the three grain types. However, the ideal malting protocol will likely differ between the grains. The kernels of einkorn are significantly smaller, and steep hydration and malt modification are quicker. In terms of potential health benefits from antioxidant capacity and dietary fiber, wort from einkorn trended to higher levels of free and conjugated ferulic acid, as well as high-molecular-weight arabinoxylan. Keywords: arabinoxylan; brewing; einkorn; enzyme activity; emmer; malt; phenolic acid; spelt; and sprouting 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Grains & Flours
    Grains and Flours IN OUR REGION Available through Greenmarket’s wholesale distribution arm, Greenmarket Co. Prices and complete product list given upon request. Buckwheat* High in amino acids and vitamins. Best as toasted whole groats, or “kasha.” Flour is best for pan- cakes, crepes, biscuits, soba noodles. Cornmeal & Polenta* Made with flint, or “Indian” corn, and dent corn. Einkorn An “ancient grain,” high in protein content and min- erals. Best for cooking whole and using flour for pancakes and crackers. Emmer (Farro) An “ancient grain,” best as a cooked Wholesale grain and for pasta and flat breads. Freekeh Wheat that is harvested green and roasted. Toasted, mildly sweet flavor. High in protein, minerals and Grains fiber, very low in gluten. Best in soups and stews. Oats* Rolled or cracked, flour upon request. Rye Low gluten, bold, assertive flavor. Blended with wheat Mission Driven Food. & Flours for bread. Grains can be cooked whole or as cracked rye. Spelt An “ancient grain,” low gluten, high protein content. Flour used for bread, pasta, crackers. Triticale A wheat-rye hybrid. High protein, low gluten. Best for breads, pancakes, crackers. Contact us for more information. Wheat flours Whole and sifted, all-purpose & pastry For wholesale inquires: flour, special blends [email protected] % Hard wheat, or “bread flour” Higher protein content, The Greenmarket Regional Grains Project best for baking bread. For more information on grains: is helping re-establish grain production in the Northeast. % Soft wheat, or “pastry flour” Lower protein content, [email protected] Greenmarket’s customers, both wholesale and retail, are best for pastry and flat breads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, C. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons University of Pennsylvania Museum of University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Papers Archaeology and Anthropology 1997 The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, c. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C. Naomi F. Miller University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers Part of the Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Miller, N. F. (1997). The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, c. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C.. Paléorient, 23 (2), 197-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/paleo.1997.4661 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/36 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, c. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C. Abstract Vegetation during the glacial period, post-glacial warming and the Younger Dryas does not seem to have been affected by human activities to any appreciable extent. Forest expansion at the beginning of the Holocene occurred independently of human agency, though early Neolithic farmers were able to take advantage of improved climatic conditions. Absence of macrobotanical remains precludes discussion of possible drought from 6,000 to 5,500 ВС. By farming, herding, and fuel-cutting, human populations began to have an impact on the landscape at different times and places. Deleterious effects of these activities became evident in the Tigris-Euphrates drainage during the third millennium ВС based on macrobotanical evidence from archaeological sites.
    [Show full text]
  • And Modern Wheat Species (Durum and Common Wheat)
    foods Article Comparative Study on Gluten Protein Composition of Ancient (Einkorn, Emmer and Spelt) and Modern Wheat Species (Durum and Common Wheat) Sabrina Geisslitz 1, C. Friedrich H. Longin 2, Katharina A. Scherf 1,3,* and Peter Koehler 4 1 Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, Lise-Meitner-Strasse 34, 85354 Freising, Germany 2 State Plant Breeding Institute, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 21, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany 3 Department of Bioactive and Functional Food Chemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Adenauerring 20a, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany 4 biotask AG, Schelztorstrasse 54-56, 73728 Esslingen am Neckar, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 August 2019; Accepted: 6 September 2019; Published: 12 September 2019 Abstract: The spectrophotometric Bradford assay was adapted for the analysis of gluten protein contents (gliadins and glutenins) of spelt, durum wheat, emmer and einkorn. The assay was applied to a set of 300 samples, including 15 cultivars each of common wheat, spelt, durum wheat, emmer and einkorn cultivated at four locations in Germany in the same year. The total protein content was equally influenced by location and wheat species, however, gliadin, glutenin and gluten contents were influenced more strongly by wheat species than location. Einkorn, emmer and spelt had higher protein and gluten contents than common wheat at all four locations. However, common wheat had higher glutenin contents than einkorn, emmer and spelt resulting in increasing ratios of gliadins to glutenins from common wheat (< 3.8) to spelt, emmer and einkorn (up to 12.1). With the knowledge that glutenin contents are suitable predictors for high baking volume, cultivars of einkorn, emmer and spelt with good predicted baking performance were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheat Improvement: the Truth Unveiled
    Wheat Improvement: The Truth Unveiled By The National Wheat Improvement Committee (NWIC) From wheat farmers to wheat scientists, we know consumers are yearning for more transparency and trust within their food “system.” We understand those concerns as consumers ourselves. In an effort to give consumers full scientific knowledge of how wheat has been improved over the years, we have worked together to publish a concise response to recent claims made by Dr. William Davis. The National Wheat Improvement Committee has compiled the following responses to Davis’ slander attack on wheat’s breeding and science improvements. Responses were developed with a scientific and historical perspective, utilizing references from peer-reviewed research and input from U.S. and international wheat scientists. Wheat Breeding & Science The wheat grown around the world today came from three grassy weed species that naturally hybridized around 10,000 years ago. The past 70 years of wheat breeding have essentially capitalized on the variation provided by wheat’s hybridization thousands of years ago and the natural mutations which occurred over the millennia as the wheat plant spread around the globe. There is no crop plant in the modern, developed world – from grass and garden flowers, to wheat and rice – that is the same as it first existed when the Earth was formed, nor is the environment the same. There is no mystery to wheat breeding. To breed new varieties, breeders employ two basic methods: Conventional crossing involves combining genes from complementary wheat plant parents to produce new genetic combinations (not new genes) in the offspring. This may account for slightly higher yield potential or disease and insect resistance relative to the parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualities of Einkorn, Emmer, and Spelt
    Qualities of Einkorn, Emmer, and Spelt Frank J. Kutka Farm Breeding Club Co-Coordinator Northern Plains Sustainable Agriculture Society Einkorn | Favored for adding excellent flavor to foods. | Suitable for baked products, some good for bread. | Higher lipid content than bread wheat (4.2 vs. 2.8 g/100g. | Usually high in minerals although low in Cadmium. | Usually higher in protein, lutein, and Vitamin E; Lower in total phenols. | Has same allergenic proteins as other wheats but may be lower in some of the gliadins that cause responses in those with celiac disease: more research is needed. Emmer | Favored for adding excellent flavor to foods. | Recommended for children and new mothers in Ethiopia and for diabetics in India. | Gluten varies from very low to higher than bread wheat: bread making properties vary but are usually lower than bread wheat. Missing some gliadin proteins. | Usually has higher minerals, higher fiber and lower glycemic index. | Often has higher antioxidants (total phenolics and flavonoids) and protein. Not high in carotenoids. | Often has higher phytic acid concentration. Emmer | The species is a known source of disease and pest resistance traits (common bunt, stem rust, leaf rust, powdery mildew, Septoria Leaf Blotch, Loose smut, Tan Spot, Russian wheat aphid, Hessian Fly) | Asian and African types appear to be more drought tolerant | Some varieties have shown tolerance to higher soil salinity | Alternate source of dwarfing trait Spelt | Spelt has gluten and similar protein composition to bread wheat but reduced bread making quality. | Higher lipid and unsaturated fatty acid content. | Some minerals tend to be higher in spelt: Fe, Zn, Mg, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Hulled Wheat Productivity and Quality in Modern Agriculture Against Conventional Wheat Species
    agriculture Article Hulled Wheat Productivity and Quality in Modern Agriculture Against Conventional Wheat Species Leszek Racho ´n 1, Aneta Bobryk-Mamczarz 2 and Anna Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz 1,* 1 Department of Plant Production Technology and Commodity Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 15, 20-950 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 2 PZZ LUBELLA GMW Sp. z o.o. Sp. k., ul. Wrotkowska 1, 20-469 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +4881-445-6629 Received: 1 June 2020; Accepted: 19 June 2020; Published: 7 July 2020 Abstract: The objective of this study is to compare the yields and qualities of the hulled wheats emmer (Triticum dicoccum Schübl.) and spelt (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. spelta) with the commonly cultivated naked wheats common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. vulgare) and durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Three years of field experiments were carried out from 2015 to 2017 in the Lubelskie province (Poland) on rendzina soils. The experimental results indicate that the hulled wheats, even when cultivated with advanced technology, produced lower yields compared to the common and durum wheats (reduced by 30–56%). In spite of their lower yields, emmer and spelt retained appropriate technological parameters. Higher ash, protein, and wet gluten yields were characteristic of the hulled wheats; however, the high gluten spread of emmer (13.3 mm) may limit its application as a raw material in some food processes. In summary, hulled wheat species can be recommended for modern agricultural production as an alternative source of high-quality materials for the agricultural and food industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewiring the Wheat Reproductive System to Harness Heterosis for the Next Wave of Yield Improvement Piotr Gornickia,1 and Justin D
    COMMENTARY Rewiring the wheat reproductive system to harness heterosis for the next wave of yield improvement Piotr Gornickia,1 and Justin D. Farisb aDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; and bCereal Crops Research Unit, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Fargo, ND 58102 Bread wheat (hexaploid Triticum aestivum) emmer that hybridized with goatgrass about provides an extraordinary 10,000-y story of 8,000 y ago (3), probably southeast of the a new species, established by early farmers, Caspian Sea, that resulted in the first hexa- selecting for simple agronomical traits to fa- ploid bread wheat (4). cilitate efficient and plentiful grain harvest. During most of the last 10,000 y, farmers The genetic changes underlying wheat domes- grew wheat in heterogenic stands consisting of tication over thousands of years, however, mixed genotypes and ploidy levels. The first included not just a collection of beneficial bread wheat captured genetic variation from single gene mutations, but also introgres- the two progenitors, but subsequent hybrid sions and whole genome duplication. The swarms allowing for gene flow and increased hexaploidization event occurred spontane- genetic variation occurred in such stands. ously in nature, but the resulting wild spe- During this time, the geographical range of cies did not survive; it is known only in wheat expanded dramatically as it acquired its domesticated form. Evolutionary bottle- adaptation to extreme environments and ad- neck(s) reduced genetic variation of the spe- ditional competitive traits such as increased cies, and it was introduced broadly outside tillering, increased height, and wide leaves (5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Accelerator Dating at the Early Village of Abu Hureyra on the Euphrates
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 34, No. 3, 1992, P. 850-858] THE IMPACT OF ACCELERATOR DATING AT THE EARLY VILLAGE OF ABU HUREYRA ON THE EUPHRATES A. M. T. MOORS Yale University, Graduate School, 1504A Yale Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-7425 USA ABSTRACT. The early village of Abu Hureyra is significant because of its great size (ca. 11.5 ha) and long sequence of occupation (ca. 11,500-7000 BP) that spans the transition from late Pleistocene hunting and gathering to early Holocene farming, and the cultural change from Epipaleolithic to Neolithic. The 40 accelerator dates obtained for Abu Hureyra provide new information on the development of agriculture in Southwest Asia. The dates have demonstrated that the site was inhabited for much longer than the few conventional radiocarbon dates for the site had suggested. The gap between the Epipaleolithic and Neolithic villages seems to have been brief. A change in climate and vegetation, dated at ca. 10,600 BP, during the span of occupation of the Epipaleolithic village, precipitated an adjustment in the foraging way of life of its inhabitants just before the inception of agriculture. Dating of individual bones and seeds has shown that the wild progenitors of sheep and several cereals were present near Abu Hureyra in the late Pleistocene and early Holocene, well outside their present areas of distribution. This has implications for where those species may have been domesticated. A rapid switch from exploitation of the gazelle to herding of sheep and goats during the Neolithic occupation occurred ca. 8300 BP. THE SITE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE Abu Hureyra was a very large prehistoric settlement mound (11.5 ha) in the Euphrates Valley of northern Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Ancient Types of Wheat Have Health Benefits Compared with Modern Bread Wheat?
    Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat? Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Open access Shewry, P. R. (2018) Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat? Journal of Cereal Science, 79. pp. 469-476. ISSN 0733-5210 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.11.010 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/75999/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.11.010 Publisher: Elsevier All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Journal of Cereal Science 79 (2018) 469e476 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cereal Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcs Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat? * Peter R. Shewry Department of Plant Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, UK article info abstract Article history: A number of studies have suggested that ancient wheats have health benefits compared with modern Received 12 October 2017 bread wheat.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Emmer
    Issued November 4,1911. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. FARMERS' BULLETIN 466. WINTER EMMER. Cerealisi hi Chiirge of the Office of Grain Iti'.'estigalions, linrean of IHanl Industry. WASHINGTON: GOVBRNMBNT PRINTING OFFICE. 1911. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AaBicn^TunE, BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF, Washinffton, D. C, Aiigust 24, 1911. SIB: I have the honor to transmit and to recommend for publica­ tion as a Farmers' Bulletin the accompanying manuscript entitled "Winter Emmer," prepai'ed by Mr. Mark Alfred Carleton, Cerealist in Charge of the Office of Grain Investigations. In recent years the cultivation of emmer in the United States has come to be of considerable importance. Heretofore almost the entire bulk of the crop has been made up of spring varieties. In localities whore spring grain is not well adapted there is always need of fall- sown varieties. The accompanying papoi' will therefore be of value to farmers in such districts. Respectfully, B. T. GALLOWAY, Chief of Bureau. Hon. JAMES WII-SOX, Secretarij of Agriculture. [A list giving the titloe of all Farmers' Bulletins available for distribution will be sent free ujion application to a Member of Congress or the Secretary of Agriculture.] 460 2 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction 5 Use of incorrect names for emmer 5 Characteristics of emmer 5 Dietribution of emmer 7 Cultivation of emmer in tlie United States 8 Introduction of winter enimer 9 Adaptation of winter emmer in the United States 10 Trials on experiment farms 10 Trials by farmers 12 Experience with Black Winter emmer on a Wyoming farm 13 Value of winter emmer as a field crop 16 Uses of winter emmer 17 Production of emmer in pounds of grain per acre as compared with other cereals.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Wheat Varieties Grown in the United States in 1949
    ■^"çfpp^ Classification of Wheat ^''^''^ LI 3 RAR' Varieties Grown in the United States in 1949 ^'^-.lifí!'. 'f3^'''^ , *,»;$.^"''' By B. B, BAYLES Principal Agronomist and J. ALLEN CLARK Senior Agronomist Field Crops Researeh Braneh Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin No. 1083 March 19S4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, B.C. Technical Bulletin No. 1083 March 1954 Classification of Wheat Varieties Grown in the United States in 1949 By B. B. BAYLES Principal Agronomist and J. ALLEN CLARK Senior Agronomist Field Crops Research Branch Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D. C. - Price 70 cents Technical Bulletin No. 1083 March 1954 Classification of Wheat Varieties Grown in the United States in 1949 ' By B. B. BAYLES, principal agronomist, and J. ALLEN CLARK, senior agronomist, Field Crops Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service CONTENTS Pa^e Page Need for classification 1 Classification of the genus Trit- Previous investigations 2 icum 35 Foreign classifications 2 Spelt.-_ 37 Domestic classifications 6 Emmer 37 Summary of previous classifica- Poulard wheat 37 tions 8 Polish wheat 40 Present investigations 9 Timopheevi 40 Classification nurseries 10 Einkorn 40 Description, history, and dis- Common wheat 40 tribution 12 Club wheat 146 Varietal nomenclature 13 Durum wheat 151 The wheat plant 14 Literature cited 158 Taxonomic characters 14 Index to varieties and synonyms.. 169 Other characters 34 NEED FOR CLASSIFICATION careful consideration by growers. The choice is partly dependent, The varieties of wheat grown in however, upon the determination the United States show a great of identity.
    [Show full text]