2.3 Latin America & the Caribbean

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2.3 Latin America & the Caribbean Regional Overview 2.3 Latin America & the Caribbean 99 2.3 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ARGENTINA THE BAHAMAS BOLIVIA BARBADOS BRAZIL BELIZE COLOMBIA BERMUDA COSTA RICA CUBA CHILE DOMINICA ECUADOR DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EL SALVADOR GRENADA GUATEMALA GUYANA HONDURAS HAITI MEXICO JAMAICA NICARAGUA PUERTO RICO PANAMA SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS PARAGUAY SAINT LUCIA PERU SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES URUGUAY SURINAME VENEZUELA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 100 Global State of Harm Reduction 2020 TABLE 2.3.1: Epidemiology of HIV and viral hepatitis, and harm reduction responses in the Latin America and the Caribbean Country/ People who HIV Hepatitis C Hepatitis B Harm reduction response territory with inject drugs prevalence (anti-HCV) (anti-HBsAg) reported injecting among prevalence prevalence Peer drug use1 people who among among distribution inject drugs people who people who NSP2 OAT3 DCRs4 of (%) inject drugs inject drugs naloxone (%) (%) Argentina 8,144[2] 3.5[3] 4.8[4] 1.6[4] x (M)[5] x x The Bahamas 0[6] nk nk nk x x x x Bolivia nk nk nk nk x x x x Brazil nk 5 9.9 [7]6 nk nk x x x x Chile nk nk nk nk x x x x Colombia 14,893[8] 5.5[9] 31.6[9] nk [10,11] (M)[10,11] x x Costa Rica nk7 nk nk nk x x x x Dominican Republic <1,359[13]8 3.2[13]9 22.8[14]10 nk 2[15] x x x Ecuador nk nk nk nk x x x x El Salvador nk nk nk nk x x x x Guatemala nk nk nk nk x x x x Guyana nk nk nk nk x x x x Haiti nk nk nk nk x x x x Honduras nk nk nk nk x x x x Jamaica nk nk nk nk x x x x Mexico 164,157[18] 11 4.4[19] 12 96[20] 13 0.2[4] [17] (M)[21] [21] x14 Nicaragua nk nk nk nk x x x x Panama 5,714[22] nk nk nk x x x x Paraguay nk nk 9.8[23] nk x x x x Peru nk nk nk nk x x x x Puerto Rico 28,000[24] 11.3[25] 15 78.4 - 89[27,28] 16 nk [29] (M,B)[29] [29] x Suriname nk[30] 17 nk nk nk x x x x Uruguay nk nk nk nk x x x x Venezuela nk nk nk nk x x x x nk = not known 1 Countries with reported injecting drug use according to Larney et al in 2017. The study found no reports of injecting drug use in Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Cuba, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Trinidad and Tobago.[1] 2 All operational needle and syringe programme (NSP) sites, including fixed sites, vending machines and mobile NSPs operating from a vehicle or through outreach workers. 3 Opioid agonist therapy (OAT), including methadone (M), buprenorphine (B) and any other form (O) such as morphine and codeine. 4 Drug consumption rooms, also known as supervised injecting sites. 5 Unpublished data from a national household survey coordinated by Francisco Bastos found very little evidence of injecting drug use in Brazil. 6 Based on data collected in 2009 in eight Brazilian cities. 7 Civil society organisations indicate that injecting drug use is minimal in Costa Rica.[12] 8 There are an estimated 56,632 people who use illegal drugs in the Dominican Republic, less than 2.4% of whom are reported to be people who inject drugs. 9 Estimate from 2012 for people who use drugs. 10 Based on data from 2008. 11 Based on data from 2011 National Addiction Survey. There may be limitations to the representativeness of this data, as household surveys are known to exclude people living out- side traditional households, such as people who are homeless or incarcerated.[16] Civil society organisations believe that this figure may be an overestimate, with the true number of people who inject drugs in the country being around 30,000.[17] 12 Based on data collected in 2006-2007. 13 Based on data collected in 2005. 14 Though one DCR operates in Mexicali, Mexico, this is not officially sanctioned by the state.[21] 15 Based on subnational data from 2015. 16 Based on subnational data from 2006-2015. Civil society organisations report that there is no effective system monitoring viral hepatitis infection among people who inject drugs in Puerto Rico.[26] 17 A 2008 government study estimated that 0.3% of Suriname’s estimated 1,000 people who use drugs are people who inject drugs. Regional Overview 2.3 Latin America & the Caribbean 101 BERMUDA MAP 2.3.1: Availability of harm reduction services THE BAHAMAS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC CUBA PUERTO RICO ANTIGUA BELIZE & BARBUDA MEXICO JAMAICA HAITI HONDURAS SAINT KITTS DOMINICA & NEVIS BARBADOS GUATEMALA SAINT LUCIA NICARAGUA SAINT VINCENT EL SALVADOR GRENADA & THE GRENADINES PANAMA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO COSTA RICA VENEZUELA GUYANA COLOMBIA SURINAME ECUADOR PERU BRAZIL BOLIVIA CHILE PARAGUAY ARGENTINA URUGUAY Both NSP and OAT available OAT only NSP only Neither available Not known DCR available Peer-distribution of naloxone 102 Global State of Harm Reduction 2020 2.3 Harm reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean NEEDLE AND SYRINGE PROGRAMMES (NSPs) Transition to domestic funding applies primarily MEXICO to services for people who inject drugs, and there remain few funding opportunities for services for the majority of people who use drugs in the region who do not inject. <5% CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ESTIMATE THAT LESS THAN 5% OF THE PEOPLE WHO INJECT DRUGS IN MEXICO ACCESS NSPs. 20% COCAINE IN LATIN AMERICA APPROXIMATELY 40% OF PEOPLE IN CONTACT WITH THE CRIMINAL APPROXIMATELY 20% OF PEOPLE IN JUSTICE SYSTEM HAVE BEEN ARRESTED ON THE PRISON IN LATIN AMERICA ARE CHARGED BASIS OF COCAINE-RELATED OFFENCES’ WITH A DRUG OFFENCE. Regional Overview 2.3 Latin America & the Caribbean 103 Author: Author: Author: Sam Shirley-Beavan Jorgelina Di Iorio Carolina Ahumada Harm Reduction Intercambios Intercambios International 1. Overview There are approximately 5.5 million people who Harm reduction programmes for people who inject drugs, use non-injected illegal drugs in Latin America and including opioid agonist therapy (OAT) and needle and the number of people who inject drugs is very low syringe programmes (NSP), operate in Colombia, the compared with other regions.[31,32] This is largely due Dominican Republic, Mexico and Puerto Rico.[11,15,21,29,45] to the fact that, currently, injecting use is relatively In Mexico, primarily in the north close to the border rare outside Mexico and Colombia[33] and because the with the USA, they also function as overdose prevention rate of use of cocaine and its derivatives (which are programmes, distributing naloxone and offering fentanyl commonly not injected) in the region is among the strips. La Sala, a safe consumption space for women highest in the world.[5,31,34] who use drugs, is the first drug consumption room (DCR) in the region, though it is not authorised by the The production and use of cocaine and coca derivatives is Mexican government.[46] prevalent in South America, specifically Bolivia, Colombia and Peru, which are responsible for virtually all the world’s Drug checking programmes (also known as substance coca leaf cultivation.[35,36] The smokable use of cocaine paste analysis) have increased in the region since 2018, and (an intermediate product in the production of cocaine are managed by civil society organisations, including in also known as basuco, paco, base paste or oxi) is greater Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay.[11,39,44] There are other than that of opioids in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, peer education projects in clubs and festivals that offer Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay.[5,32,37–39] It is a cheaper assistance, information and hydration points to reduce risk alternative to cocaine in South America and people who related to recreational drug use.[5,43] use cocaine paste, as well as those who use crack cocaine, are usually from socially marginalised groups, are more There are several examples from recent years of regression stigmatised and face more barriers to access to health towards more punitive drug policies in Latin America. care and harm reduction programmes than other people. For example, new governments in Brazil and Bolivia [5,11,12,34] have explicitly rejected harm reduction as a response to illegal drug use and closed successful programmes, The rate of opioid use in Latin America and the Caribbean is replacing them with abstinence-based, rehabilitation lower than that of amphetamine-type substances (ATS) or and law enforcement-led projects.[36] In several other other new psychoactive substances (NPS). However, opioid countries such as Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El use is prevalent in Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, the response to drug Mexico and Puerto Rico.[11,15,21,29,31] NPS use is increasing in use continues to be dominated by abstinence-centred Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru and programmes.[12,15] Uruguay. MDMA is the most common substance among ATS, and NPS such as ketamine, synthetic cannabinoids and With reductions in funding from international donors, the synthetic hallucinogens are also used in some countries. funding landscape for harm reduction in Latin America is [11,12,21,32,37,39–41] becoming increasingly difficult. Due to the socio-economic crisis in the region caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Harm reduction programmes for people who use non- national government funding has also decreased.
Recommended publications
  • Factors That Influence the Provision of Intrapartum and Postnatal Care By
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle- income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis (Review) Munabi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fretheim A, Nabudere H Munabi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fretheim A, Nabudere H. Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD011558. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2. www.cochranelibrary.com Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 4 BACKGROUND .................................... 21 Figure1. ..................................... 23 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 24 METHODS ...................................... 24 RESULTS....................................... 27 Figure2. ..................................... 28 Figure3. ..................................... 31 DISCUSSION ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • LMIC Databases August 2013
    LMIC Databases August 2013 A collection of databases, web sites and journals relevant to Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) This list has been put together in a collaborative effort by Cochrane Groups, the WHO Library and volunteers outside the Cochrane Collaboration. Please click the navigation pane to see the list content. For information on how the list has developed, please see the history note at the bottom of this document. Any comments you might have to the list, or suggestions for additional resources, will be most welcome. Contact person: [email protected] Global Databases 3ie Database of Impact Evaluations URL http://www.3ieimpact.org/en/evidence/ Provider 3ie Region Global – low and middle income countries Description Covers impact evaluations conducted in low- and middle- income countries. Search language English Format Web Content language English Content Impact evaluation studies Draws from a wide range of sources (22 databases and 12 research web sites) including grey literature To be included, the study must meet 3ie’s quality standards. MEDLINE overlap Unclear Database size Circa 750 publications [February 2013] Journals indexed Not applicable. Individual papers included Other items indexed Unclear Update frequency Unclear Search options Basic keyword (single box) and advanced search. Search function Advanced search has options to search within title, author, country, region, sector (topic), vulnerable groups, evaluation method (eg experimental, quasi-experimental), status (eg ongoing, published) and whether or not there is a gender focus. Search tips Can search for single terms or phrases. Does not appear to support Boolean logic as yet. Search example Text words in basic search (keywords) and words in title/author boxes plus drop down boxes in advanced search (see search function).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Strengthening Research Capacities for Health in the Caribbean, 2007–2017 Executive Summary Iii
    Executive Summary i REPORT ON STRENGTHENING RESEARCH CAPACITIES FOR HEALTH IN THE CARIBBEAN 2007-2017 ii Report on Strengthening Research Capacities for Health in the Caribbean, 2007–2017 Executive Summary iii REPORT ON STRENGTHENING RESEARCH CAPACITIES FOR HEALTH IN THE CARIBBEAN 2007-2017 Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) Office of Knowledge Management, Bioethics and Research (KBR) Secretariat to the Advisory Committee on Health Research Washington, D.C. 2017 iv Report on Strengthening Research Capacities for Health in the Caribbean, 2007–2017 Report on Strengthening Research Capacities for Health in the Caribbean, 2007-2017 Document Number: PAHO/KBR/17-021 © Pan American Health Organization, 2017 All rights reserved. Publications of the Pan American Health Organization are available on the PAHO website (www.paho.org). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate PAHO Publications should be addressed to the Communications Department through the PAHO website (www.paho.org/ permissions). Suggested citation: Pan American Health Organization. Report on Strengthening Research Capacities for Health in the Caribbean, 2007-2017. Washington, D.C.: PAHO; 2017. Available at http://iris.paho. org/xmlui/handle/123456789/34342. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data: CIP data are available at http://iris.paho.org. Publications of the Pan American Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Pan American Health Organization concerning the status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Grenada Health System: National and Regional Structures and Influences 22
    Acknowledgements This “Rapid Assessment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and HIV Policy, This report is a Systems and Services in Grenada” was undertaken by the United Nations product of the Population Fund (UNFPA) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health of United Nations Grenada from August to November 2010. Population Fund (UNFPA)/ Sub- Sincere thanks and appreciation are extended to all persons interviewed and Regional Office for involved in the process of data collection for this report, particularly Senator the Caribbean. It the Hon. Ann Peters, Minister of Health, for securing representatives of was prepared by Ms the Ministry to oversee country coordination of data collection and report Cherise Adjodha, reviewing processes; Dr. George Mitchell, Senior Medical Officer, who was Consultant, on appointed as the Ministry of Health focal point, for coordination of all Ministry- behalf of UNFPA. related interviews and site visits; and Dr. Alister Antoine, Medical Officer of Health, for overseeing coordination of the national stakeholder consultation OCTOBER 2011 held to review and validate the report’s findings and recommendations. UNFPA also acknowledges the assistance of all respondents and staff of the following agencies and organizations: Ministry of Health Ministry of Education Grenada Council for the Disabled Legal Aid and Counselling Clinic (LACC) Ministry of Social Affairs Hope Pals Foundation Grenada National Organisation of Women (GNOW) Grenada Planned Parenthood Association National AIDS Council Grenada/Caribbean HIV/AIDS Partnership (GrenCHAP) Child Welfare Authority Ministry of Legal Affairs Grenada Community Development Agency (GRENCODA) United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Sub-Regional Office for the Caribbean/Barbados UN House Marine Gardens, Hastings, Christ Church, Barbados TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXES 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 3 INTRODUCTION 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CARPHA State of Public Health Inaugural Report 2013
    Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 ContentsExecutive Summary ............................................................................................................. ........................................................... 3 15 AbbreviationsFigures ....................................................................................................................... and Acronyms .......................................................................... 1120 ExecutiveTables ....................................................................................................................... Summary ........................................................................... 10 24 FiguresSection 1 Regional Health Overview ........................................................................................... ......................... 20 25 Tables1.1 Demographics .............................................................................................................. ............................................................. 23 27 Section 1.1.1 The1 Regional Caribbean Health Region Overview ................................................................................................... ............................................... 2527 1.1.1.1 Demographic overview of CARPHA Member States ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2019
    2019 Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean The new global financial context: effects and transmission mechanisms in the region Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps 2019 Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean The new global financial context: effects and transmission mechanisms in the region 2 Executive summary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Daniel Titelman Chief, Economic Development Division Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division The Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean is issued annually by the Economic Development Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). The 2019 edition was prepared under the leadership of Daniel Titelman, Chief of the Division, and coordinated by Ramón Pineda Salazar and Daniel Titelman. In the preparation of this edition, the Economic Development Division was assisted by the Statistics Division, the Division of International Trade and Integration, the ECLAC subregional headquarters in Mexico City and Port of Spain, and the Commission’s country offices in Bogotá, Brasilia, Buenos Aires, Montevideo and Washington, D.C. Part I, entitled, “The economic situation and outlook for 2019”, was prepared with input from the following experts: Alejandra Acevedo, Claudio Aravena, Pablo Carvallo, Claudia de Camino, Ivonne González, Michael Hanni, Juan Pablo Jiménez, Noel Pérez, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, Ramón Pineda Salazar, José Antonio Sánchez, Cecilia Vera and Jürgen Weller.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    Participant List 4/14/2019 8:59:41 AM Category First Name Last Name Position Organization Nationality CSO Jillian Abballe UN Advocacy Officer and Anglican Communion United States Head of Office Osman Abbass Head of Sudan Sickle Cell Sudan Sickle Cell Anemia Sudan Anemia Center Center Babak Abbaszadeh President and Chief Toronto Centre for Global Canada Executive Officer Leadership in Financial Supervision Ilhom Abdulloev Executive Director Open Society Institute Tajikistan Assistance Foundation - Tajikistan Mohammed Abdulmawjoo Director The Engineering Association Iraq d for Development & Environment Kassim Abdulsalam Zonal Coordinator/Field Strength in Diversity Nigeria Executive Development Centre, Nigeria and Farmers Advocacy and Support Initiative in Nig Serena Abi Khalil Research and Program Arab NGO Network for Lebanon Officer Development (ANND) Kjetil Abildsnes Senior Adviser, Economic Norwegian Church Aid (NCA) Norway Justice Maria Victoria Abreu Lugar Program Manager Global Foundation for Dominican Democracy and Development Republic (GFDD) Edmond Abu Executive Director Native Consortium & Research Sierra Leone Center Mohammed Abu-Nimer Senior Advisor KAICIID Dialogue Centre United States Aouadi Achraf Founder I WATCH Tunisia Terica Adams Executive Director Hamilton National Dance Day United States Inc. Laurel Adams Chief Executive Officer Women for Women United States International Zoë Adams Executive Director The Strongheart Group United States BAKINAM ADAMU C E O Organization for Research and Ghana Community Development Ghana
    [Show full text]
  • Antigua & Barbuda's 2015-2020 National Action Plan
    Antigua & Barbuda’s 2015-2020 National Action Plan: Combatting Desertification, Land Degradation & Drought i | P a g e Table of Contents FOREWORD................................................................................................................................................. VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................. VII ANTIGUA & BARBUDA’S 2015-2020 NATIONAL ACTION PLAN PROJECT TEAM.................................. VIII ACRONYMS.................................................................................................................................................IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................XI BACKGROUND...........................................................................................................................................12 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................12 DESCRIPTION OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA..........................................................................................................13 Geography ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Climate..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lovell 0708 Antigua Barbuda
    REGIONALISM VERSUS NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY: THE PROMISE AND PROBLEMS OF A CARICOM FISHERIES AGREEMENT Tricia Lovell The United Nations-Nippon Foundation Fellowship Programme 2007 - 2008 DIVISION FOR OCEAN AFFAIRS AND THE LAW OF THE SEA OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, THE UNITED NATIONS NEW YORK, 2008 DISCLAIMER The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of Antigua & Barbuda, the United Nations, the Nippon Foundation of Japan, or the University of Massachusetts - Boston. © 2008 Tricia Lovell. All rights reserved. i ABSTRACT The Caribbean Sea is the second largest sea in the world and is characterised by its complex biogeography and diversity of marine life. Thirty-three States and territories border the region, including the fifteen members and five associate members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). The CARICOM States have had a long and tumultuous history of economic integration, culminating with the formation of the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME) in 2006. In February 2003, the CARICOM Heads of Government accepted and endorsed a proposal by one of its member States to create a Common Fisheries Policy and Regime (CFPR) for the CARICOM region. This regime would essentially extend the rights and freedoms enjoyed under the CSME to the fisheries economic sectors of member States. In so doing, it would create a regional arrangement that would include the creation of a Common Fisheries Zone (CFZ), encompassing the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) of member States beyond the 12-mile territorial sea. Within the CFZ, the Community members would be allowed equal access to surplus stocks deemed able to sustain harvest.
    [Show full text]