DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification sustainability Review Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective Yuteng Xiao 1, Jihang Yin 1, Yifan Hu 1, Junzhe Wang 2, Hongsheng Yin 1,* and Honggang Qi 3 1 School of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; [email protected] (Y.X.); [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (Y.H.) 2 Bell Honors School, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China; [email protected] 3 School of Computer and Control Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-137-7589-2769 Received: 23 October 2018; Accepted: 29 December 2018; Published: 4 January 2019 Abstract: By igniting in the coal seam and injecting gas agent, underground coal gasification (UCG) causes coal to undergo thermochemical reactions in situ and, thus, to be gasified into syngas for power generation, hydrogen production, and storage. Compared with traditional mining technology, UCG has the potential sustainable advantages in energy, environment, and the economy. The paper reviewed the development of UCG projects around the world and points out that UCG faces difficulties in the field of monitoring and control in UCG. It is expounded for the current research status of monitoring and control in UCG, and clarified that monitoring and control in UCG is not perfect, remaining in the stage of exploration. To improve the problem of low coal gasification rate and gas production, and then to make full use of the potential sustainable advantages, the paper offers a perception platform of a UCG monitoring system based on the Internet-of-Things (IoT) and an optimal control model for UCG based on deep learning, and has an outlook on breakthrough directions of the key technologies related to the package structure design for moisture-proof and thermal insulation, antenna design, the strategy for energy management optimization, feature extraction and classification design for the network model, network structure design, network learning augmentation, and the control of the network model, respectively. Keywords: underground coal gasification; monitoring and control; Internet of Things; deep learning 1. Introduction Coal is one of the most important fossil fuels in the world, playing a vital role in human production, especially in industrial heating, urban gas production, power generation, and other fields. However, the use of coal, especially the emission of sulfides and nitrogen oxides during coal combustion, causing a series of environmental problems, has seriously affected the physical and psychological health and living quality of human beings all over the world [1]. One way to solve these problems is UCG. It converts coal into gas, followed by the operation of removing sulfides and nitrogen oxides, bypassing the traditional coal-burning process, and has the characteristics of low pollution emission [2]. In addition, UCG is also characterized by a high resource utilization rate [3] (it can exploit the unmineable coal compared with the traditional mining technology, such as coal that is too deep, of low grade, and in thin seams) and low cost [4] (water and coal in situ can be used directly during Sustainability 2019, 11, 217; doi:10.3390/su11010217 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2019, 11, 217 2 of 14 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14 UCG process, reducing operating costs). Therefore, UCG is one of the most promising sustainable sustainable technologies in energy, environment, and the economy, having broad application technologies in energy, environment, and the economy, having broad application prospects [5]. prospects [5]. Figure1 illustrates the schematic diagram for UCG. With the compressor injecting a gas agent Figure 1 illustrates the schematic diagram for UCG. With the compressor injecting a gas agent (air, oxygen, oxygen enrichment with different concentration, carbon dioxide, or steam) through an (air, oxygen, oxygen enrichment with different concentration, carbon dioxide, or steam) through an injection well, the coal in the coal seam, deeply buried under overburden, is gasified into syngas by injection well, the coal in the coal seam, deeply buried under overburden, is gasified into syngas by igniting in the active cavity. Then the harmful gases, such as sulfides and nitrogen oxides, in syngas are igniting in the active cavity. Then the harmful gases, such as sulfides and nitrogen oxides, in syngas in the operation of gas cleaning and the residue is left underground. Finally, the syngas with H2, CO, are in the operation of gas cleaning and the residue is left underground. Finally, the syngas with H2, and CH4, which is output through the production well, becomes a clean feed gas for power generation, CO, and CH4, which is output through the production well, becomes a clean feed gas for power hydrogen production, and storage [6,7]. generation, hydrogen production, and storage [6,7]. Figure 1. Schematic diagram for UCG. Figure 1. Schematic diagram for UCG. InIn thethe nearly nearly 100 100 years years of research of research and practice and inpractice the world, in the many world, experiences many andexperiences achievements and haveachievements been accumulated have been in accumulated the methods in and the technologies methods and of technologies UCG. However, of UCG. in practice However, the gasification in practice processthe gasification needs to beprocess monitored needs and to controlledbe monitored to ensure and thatcontrolled the underground to ensure gasificationthat the underground has a stable combustiblegasification has gas a composition stable combustible and calorific gas composition value, as well and as calorific a higher value, gas yield as well and as gasification a higher gas rate yield [1]. UCGand gasification is a very complex rate [1]. physical UCG is and a very chemical complex process, physical and manyand chemical factors affectprocess, the and composition many factors and qualityaffect the of syngas.composition Considering and quality high of temperature syngas. Considering humidity high and closedtemperature environment, humidity it and is difficult closed toenvironment, effectively monitor it is difficult and controlto effectively the UCG monito processr and to control improve the the UCG quality process of theto improve syngas. the Therefore, quality scholarsof the syngas. in various Therefore, countries scholars have in carried various out countries a series have of meaningful carried out research a series onof meaningful the monitoring research and controlon the inmonitoring UCG, such and as control the GPR in (Ground UCG, such Penetrating as the GPR Radar) (Ground technique Penetratin for theg monitoringRadar) technique [8,9], and for studythe monitoring on controlling [8,9], theand combustion study on controlling state in the the gasification combustion process state in [10 the–14 gasification]. There are process few related [10– studies,14]. There technical are few means related remaining studies, on technical paper, or means at the experimentalremaining on teaching paper, level,or at andthe basicexperimental research isteaching almost level, blank. and Therefore, basic research there are is almost still some blank. obstacles Therefore, standing there inare the still way some to actualobstacles application standing atin present.the way to In actual recent application years, with at present. the rapid In developmentrecent years, with of the the Internet-of-Things rapid development (IoT) of the and Internet- deep learningof-Things research (IoT) and [15– 19deep], great learning success research has been [15–19], achieved great in solving success complex has been monitoring achieved and in controlsolving problemscomplex monitoring [20–25]. This and undoubtedly control problems provides [20–25]. a new This idea undoubtedly for the monitoring provides and a new control idea of for UCG. the monitoring and control of UCG. Based on this, the paper puts forward a new idea about monitoring and control of UCG based on IoT and deep learning to improve the problem of the low coal gasification rate and gas production, and then makes full use of the potential sustainable advantages. Sustainability 2019, 11, 217 3 of 14 Based on this, the paper puts forward a new idea about monitoring and control of UCG based on IoT and deep learning to improve the problem of the low coal gasification rate and gas production, and then makes full use of the potential sustainable advantages. This paper reviews the development of UCG projects worldwide and the research progress related to monitoring and control for UCG. Taking the development of IoT and deep learning as an opportunity, it is a new idea of applying the IoT and deep learning into monitoring and control in UCG to be put forward, and the key technical breakthrough directions related to them are also discussed. 2. The Development of UCG Projects Worldwide In 1868, William Siemens creatively proposed the technical idea of coal gasification in the underground, and then the Russian chemist Dimitri I. Mendeleev proposed the process conception of UCG in 1888 [26]. By the beginning of the 20th century, as many cities were covered with smoke from the side effects of the Industrial Revolution, William Ramsay opened the first UCG test in Durham, England to try to solve the problem [27]. Since then, the world’s major coal powers have been competing for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coal and Oil: the Dark Monarchs of Global Energy – Understanding Supply and Extraction Patterns and Their Importance for Futur
    nam et ipsa scientia potestas est List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2008) A decline rate study of Norwe- gian oil production. Energy Policy, 36(11):4262–4271 II Höök, M., Söderbergh, B., Jakobsson, K., Aleklett, K. (2009) The evolution of giant oil field production behaviour. Natural Resources Research, 18(1):39–56 III Höök, M., Hirsch, R., Aleklett, K. (2009) Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production. Energy Pol- icy, 37(6):2262–2272 IV Jakobsson, K., Söderbergh, B., Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2009) How reasonable are oil production scenarios from public agen- cies? Energy Policy, 37(11):4809–4818 V Höök M, Söderbergh, B., Aleklett, K. (2009) Future Danish oil and gas export. Energy, 34(11):1826–1834 VI Aleklett K., Höök, M., Jakobsson, K., Lardelli, M., Snowden, S., Söderbergh, B. (2010) The Peak of the Oil Age - analyzing the world oil production Reference Scenario in World Energy Outlook 2008. Energy Policy, 38(3):1398–1414 VII Höök M, Tang, X., Pang, X., Aleklett K. (2010) Development journey and outlook for the Chinese giant oilfields. Petroleum Development and Exploration, 37(2):237–249 VIII Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2009) Historical trends in American coal production and a possible future outlook. International Journal of Coal Geology, 78(3):201–216 IX Höök, M., Aleklett, K. (2010) Trends in U.S. recoverable coal supply estimates and future production outlooks. Natural Re- sources Research, 19(3):189–208 X Höök, M., Zittel, W., Schindler, J., Aleklett, K.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT Steps up Fight to Curb Global Warming
    THE NETL CARBON SEQUESTRATION NEWSLETTER: ANNUAL INDEX SEPTEMBER 2005 – AUGUST 2006 This is a compilation of the past year’s monthly National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Sequestration Newsletter. The newsletter is produced by the NETL to provide information on activities and publications related to carbon sequestration. It covers domestic, international, public sector, and private sector news. This compilation covers newsletters issued between September 2005 and August 2006. It highlights the primary news and events that have taken place in the carbon sequestration arena over the past year. Information that has become outdated (e.g. conference dates, paper submittals, etc.) was removed. To navigate this document please use the Table of Contents below, the Bookmarks tab or the Acrobat search tool (Ctrl+F). To subscribe to this newsletter, please visit http://listserv.netl.doe.gov/mailman/listinfo/sequestration. To access the newsletter archive, see: http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/carbon_seq/subscribe.html. HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................................................ 2 SEQUESTRATION IN THE NEWS .............................................................................................................. 5 ANNOUNCEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 29 SCIENCE................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Carbon Emissions Allowance Allocation Method Based on Equilibrium Strategy for Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Coal-Fired Power Industry
    sustainability Article New Carbon Emissions Allowance Allocation Method Based on Equilibrium Strategy for Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Coal-Fired Power Industry Qing Feng 1, Qian Huang 1, Qingyan Zheng 2 and Li Lu 1,2,* 1 Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China; [email protected] (Q.F.); [email protected] (Q.H.) 2 Tourism School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-028-85996613 Received: 18 July 2018; Accepted: 17 August 2018; Published: 17 August 2018 Abstract: The carbon emissions from coal-fired power have become an increasing concern to governments around the world. In this paper, a carbon emissions allowances allocation based on the equilibrium strategy is proposed to mitigate coal-fired power generation carbon emissions, in which the authority is the lead decision maker and the coal-fired power plants are the follower decision makers, and an interactive solution approach is designed to achieve equilibrium. A real-world case study is then given to demonstrate the practicality and efficiency of this methodology. Sensitivity analyses under different constraint violation risk levels are also conducted to give authorities some insights into equilibrium strategies for different stakeholders and to identify the necessary tradeoffs between economic development and carbon emissions mitigation. It was found that the proposed method was able to mitigate coal-fired power generation carbon emissions significantly and encourage coal-fired power plants to improve their emissions performance. Keywords: carbon emission allowance allocation; emission mitigation; coal-fired power generation; cap and tax mechanism 1. Introduction Because of their major contribution to global climate change, there has been increased research to determine the best ways to reduce carbon emissions, which have been exponentially increasing due to the increased demand for energy [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Storing Syngas Lowers the Carbon Price for Profitable Coal Gasification
    Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center Working Paper CEIC-07-10 www.cmu.edu/electricity Storing syngas lowers the carbon price for profitable coal gasification ADAM NEWCOMER AND JAY APT Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center, Tepper School of Business, and Department of Engineering and Public Policy, 254 Posner Hall, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) electric power generation systems with carbon capture and sequestration have desirable environmental qualities, but are not profitable when the carbon dioxide price is less than approximately $50 per metric ton. We examine whether an IGCC facility that operates its gasifier continuously but stores the syngas and produces electricity only when daily prices are high may be profitable at significantly lower CO2 prices. Using a probabilistic analysis, we have calculated the plant-level return on investment (ROI) and the value of syngas storage for IGCC facilities located in the US Midwest using a range of storage configurations. Adding a second turbine to use the stored syngas to generate electricity at peak hours and implementing 12 hours of above ground high pressure syngas storage significantly increases the ROI and net present value. Storage lowers the carbon price at which IGCC enters the US generation mix by approximately 25%. 1 Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center Working Paper CEIC-07-10 www.cmu.edu/electricity Introduction Producing electricity from coal-derived synthesis gas (syngas) in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) facility can improve criteria pollutant performance over other coal-fueled technologies such as pulverized coal (PC) facilities [1-5] and can be implemented with carbon capture and sequestration.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Coal Gasification Techniques, Problems and Its Solutions Dr
    ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2, Issue 3, September 2012 Underground Coal Gasification Techniques, Problems and its Solutions Dr. S.M Ali, Punyashree Pattanayak, Shubhra projects have started in Australia, China, South Africa and Abstract-Underground coal gasification (UCG) is an industrial others such as India, Canada and the UK are not far behind process, which converts coal into product gas. UCG is Large-scale operations (>1GW) were developed by the an in-situ gasification process carried out in non-mined coal seams using injection of oxidants, and bringing the product gas to Soviets in the 1970's and at least one plant in Uzbekistan still surface through production wells drilled from the surface. The operates today. Low natural gas prices in the 1990's product gas could to be used as a chemical feedstock or eliminated much of the ongoing development in US, although as fuel for power generation. The technique can be applied to in Europe, a substantial program of development in deeper resources that are otherwise unprofitable or technically seams was maintained until the present day. Extensive trials complicated to extract by traditional mining methods, and it also in Europe, the US, Russia, Australia, have proven the offers an alternative to conventional coal mining methods for some resources. The development work on UCG undertaken in the technology on many occasions. UCG in combination with West over the past 20 years has focussed on technology CCS (Co2 capture and storage) shows considerable promise improvements undertaken within an R&D framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Characteristics
    CCTR Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research COAL CHARACTERISTICS CCTR Basic Facts File # 8 Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin The Energy Center at Discovery Park Purdue University CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 http://www.purdue.edu/dp/energy/CCTR/ Email: [email protected] October 2008 1 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL FORMATION As geological processes apply pressure to peat over time, it is transformed successively into different types of coal Source: Kentucky Geological Survey http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/images/peatcoal.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/coalform.htm&h=354&w=579&sz= 20&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=NavOy9_5HD07pM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=134&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcoal%2Bphotos%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX 2 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL ANALYSIS Elemental analysis of coal gives empirical formulas such as: C137H97O9NS for Bituminous Coal C240H90O4NS for high-grade Anthracite Coal is divided into 4 ranks: (1) Anthracite (2) Bituminous (3) Sub-bituminous (4) Lignite Source: http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=4929705428518&lang=en-US&mkt=en-US&FORM=CVRE8 3 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR BITUMINOUS COAL Bituminous Coal: Great pressure results in the creation of bituminous, or “soft” coal. This is the type most commonly used for electric power generation in the U.S. It has a higher heating value than either lignite or sub-bituminous, but less than that of anthracite. Bituminous coal
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Gas Origins and Exploration Strategies ©
    COAL GAS ORIGINS AND EXPLORATION STRATEGIES © Andrew R. Scott Altuda Energy Corporation San Antonio, Texas USA [email protected] A LTUDA Mid-Continent Coalbed Methane Symposium Tulsa, Oklahoma November 7-9, 2004 © 2004 A.R. Scott EARTH AT NIGHT Page1of1 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 Year Data from U.S. Bureau of the Census; ftuture growth estimates from U.S. Census Bureau publication NP-T1, February 2000; website www.mnforsustain.org/united_states_population.htm World view problems 1. Energy 2. Water 3. Food 4. Environment 5. Poverty 6. Terrorism & War 7. Disease 2. Education 9. Democracy 10. Population Tinker (2004) after Smalley (2003) U.S. ENERGY COMPARISON To Produce 20% of US Energy Demand (20 Quads per year) 1 million kg biomass/km2* 16,000 BTU/kg = .02 Q/4,000km2 after loss 20 ac/turbine 175,000 Kwh/yr/turbine 33 million turbines Solar Wind Biomass According to Pimentel et al. (BioScience Sept. 1994), Tinker RMS AAPG Keynote (2004) A LTUDA NATURAL GAS DEPLETION RATES 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Rocky Texas Oklahoma Offshore Lower 48 Mountain GOM Kenderdine (2002) 1990 1999 A LTUDA COALBED METHANE PRODUCTION IN U.S. 2,000 1,800 1614 1600 1,600 1562 1379 1,400 1252 1194 1,200 1090 1003 956 1,000 851 800 752 600 539 400 348 196 200 91 10 17 24 40 0 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 2003 Energy Information Year Administration (1992, 1995,1999, 2002, 2004) A LTUDA COALBED METHANE EXPLORATION MODEL Permeability Gas content Hydrodynamics CoalbedCoalbed MethaneMethane ProducibilityProducibility Coal rank and Depositional gas generation systems and coal distribution Tectonic and structural setting A LTUDA A LTUDA EVALUATION OF GAS CHEMISTRY • Gas chromatographic analyses provides information about gas chemistry; percentages of hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Asx Announcement
    ABN: 60 076 157 045 ACN: 076 157 045 Smellie & Co Building, 32 Edward Street (GPO Box 1315) BRISBANE QLD 4001 Telephone: (07) 3229 0800 Facsimile: (07) 3229 6800 ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 5 October 2010 LINC ENERGY ENTERS INTO MOU WITH GFZ (GERMANY) FOR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS) IN UCG CAVITIES • Linc Energy signs MOU with leading European research centre, GFZ, to develop carbon capture & storage technology for UCG projects Linc Energy Ltd (ASX:LNC) (OTCQX:LNCGY) is pleased to announce it has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a leading German carbon capture and storage (CCS) research centre to develop and apply CCS technology to Company’s Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) operations. Signed with Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) based in Potsdam, Germany, the MOU establishes a framework for an exclusive working relationship for potential UCG and CCS projects. Under the terms of the agreement, GFZ will work on combined UCG and CCS exclusively for Linc Energy over the next 3 years and will conduct research to confirm the extent of CO2 storage available in remaining UCG cavities once the UCG process is complete. Linc Energy has agreed to contribute €24,000 per quarter towards the UCG-CCS research and will retain ownership of all intellectual property developed. Academic evidence exists which indicates that UCG cavities are capable of absorbing significant quantities of CO2. This research also suggests that UCG cavities could absorb up to 400 times more carbon than traditional CCS methods due to the effect of the UCG process on the surrounding coal seam.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 32: Coke Production
    NPTEL – Chemical – Chemical Technology II Lecture 32: Coke production 32.1 Introduction Coal is used as fuel for electric power generation, industrial heating and steam generation, domestic heating, rail roads and for coal processing. Coal composition is denoted by rank. Rank increases with the carbon content and decreases with increasing oxygen content. Many of the products made by hydrogenation, oxidation, hydrolysis or fluorination are important for industrial use. Stable, low cost, petroleum and natural gas supplies has arose interest in some of the coal products as upgraded fuels to reduce air pollution as well as to take advantage of greater ease of handling of the liquid or gaseous material and to utilize existing facilities such as pipelines and furnaces. 32.2 Coking of coal Raw material is Bituminous coal. It appears to have specific internal surfaces in the range of 30 to 100m2/g. Generally one ton of bituminous coal produces 1400 lb of coke. 10 gallons of tar. Chemical reaction:- 4(C3H4)n nC6H6 + 5nC + 3nH2 + nCH4 Coal Benzene Coke Lighter hydrocarbon Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 1 of 9 NPTEL – Chemical – Chemical Technology II Process flow sheet: Illustrated in Figure. Figure 32.1 Flow sheet of coking of coal 32.3 Functional role of each unit (Figure 32.1): (a) Coal crusher and screening: At first Bituminous coal is crushed and screened to a certain size. Preheating of coal (at 150-250˚C) is done to reduce coking time without loss of coal quality. Briquetting increases strength of coke produced and to make non - coking or poorly coking coals to be used as metallurgical coke.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter L—Coal-Bed Methane Gas-In-Place Resource Estimates
    Chapter L National Coal Resource Coal-Bed Methane Gas-In-Place Resource Assessment Estimates Using Sorption Isotherms and Burial History Reconstruction: An Example from the Ferron Sandstone Member Click here to return to Disc 1 Volume Table of Contents of the Mancos Shale, Utah By Todd A. Dallegge1 and Charles E. Barker1 Chapter L of Geologic Assessment of Coal in the Colorado Plateau: Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah Edited by M.A. Kirschbaum, L.N.R. Roberts, and L.R.H. Biewick U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1625–B* 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 * This report, although in the USGS Professional Paper series, is available only on CD-ROM and is not available separately U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... L1 What Is Coal-Bed Methane? ...................................................................................................................... 2 Importance of Coal-Bed Methane Production ........................................................................................ 2 How Much Coal-Bed Methane is Available?........................................................................................... 3 How Do Coal Beds Generate and Store Methane? ................................................................................ 4 Details About Coal Cleat....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Fuel and Electricity from Coal with Low Carbon Dioxide Emissions
    Producing Fuel and Electricity from Coal with Low Carbon Dioxide Emissions K. Blok, C.A. Hendriks, W.C. Turkenburg Depanrnent of Science,Technology and Society University of Utrecht Oudegracht320, NL-351 1 PL Utrecht, The Netherlands R.H. Williams Center for Energy and Environmental Studies Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey08544, USA June 1991 Abstract. New energy technologies are needed to limit CO2 emissions and the detrimental effects of global warming. In this article we describe a process which produces a low-carbon gaseousfuel from coal. Synthesis gas from a coal gasifier is shifted to a gas mixture consisting mainly of H2 and CO2. The CO2 is isolated by a physical absorption process, compressed,and transported by pipeline to a depleted natural gas field where it is injected. What remains is a gaseousfuel consisting mainly of hydrogen. We describe two applications of this fuel. The first involves a combined cycle power plant integrated with the coal gasifier, the shift reactor and the CO2 recovery units. CO2 recovery and storage will increase the electricity production cost by one third. The secondprovides hydrogen or a hydrogen-rich fuel gas for distributed applications, including transportation; it is shown that the fuel can be produced at a cost comparable to projected costs for gasoline. A preliminary analysis reveals that all components of the process described here are in such a phase of development that the proposed technology is ready for demonstration. ~'> --. ~'"' .,.,""~ 0\ ~ 0\0 ;.., ::::. ~ ~ -.., 01) §~ .5~ c0 ~.., ~'> '" .~ ~ ..::. ~ ~ "'~'" '" 0\00--. ~~ ""00 Q....~~ '- ~~ --. ~.., ~ ~ ""~ 0000 .00 t¥") $ ~ .9 ~~~ .- ..~ c ~ ~ ~ .~ O"Oe) """1;3 .0 .-> ...~ 0 ~ ,9 u u "0 ...~ --.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Gasification
    STRATEGIC ANALYSIS The Future of Gasification By DeLome Fair coal gasification projects in the U.S. then slowed significantly, President and Chief Executive Officer, with the exception of a few that were far enough along in Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. development to avoid being cancelled. However, during this time period and on into the early 2010s, China continued to build a large number of coal-to-chemicals projects, beginning first with ammonia, and then moving on to methanol, olefins, asification technology has experienced periods of both and a variety of other products. China’s use of coal gasification high and low growth, driven by energy and chemical technology today is by far the largest of any country. China markets and geopolitical forces, since introduced into G rapidly grew its use of coal gasification technology to feed its commercial-scale operation several decades ago. The first industrialization-driven demand for chemicals. However, as large-scale commercial application of coal gasification was China’s GDP growth has slowed, the world’s largest and most in South Africa in 1955 for the production of coal-to-liquids. consistent market for coal gasification technology has begun During the 1970s development of coal gasification was pro- to slow new builds. pelled in the U.S. by the energy crisis, which created a political climate for the country to be less reliant on foreign oil by converting domestic coal into alternative energy options. Further growth of commercial-scale coal gasification began in “Market forces in high-growth the early 1980s in the U.S., Europe, Japan, and China in the coal-to-chemicals market.
    [Show full text]