DOCSLIB.ORG

The Biblical Doctrine of Salvation Maintaining Truth and Unity by Pastor Matt Postiff, Ph.D., Th.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Biblical Doctrine of Salvation Maintaining Truth and Unity by Pastor Matt Postiff, Ph.D., Th.M. Electronic copy of these materials is available at http://fbcaa.org/ucb/ Workshop #1 Salvation: Labels and Positions Introduction My name is Matt Postiff. I have been a pastor in Ann Arbor, Michigan for over 10 years and I have been involved in active Christian ministry for almost 20 years. I have been married since 2003 to Naomi, and have three sons named David, John, and Daniel (ages 11, 10, and 7). Prior to becoming a pastor full-time, I studied and worked in the area of computer engineering. I received a doctorate (Ph.D.) in computer engineering in 2001 and did consulting work with a multi-national company headquartered in Silicon Valley in the state of California. As a result of having this training, I also have interests in technology ministry through websites and Bible translation software. I have been preparing for this conference since May, and I have been joined in prayer by members of the GMSA (MESA) leadership, missionaries, and friends, asking that God would use this time to inform, encourage, and strengthen you and your churches throughout Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay. In these days of apostasy, it is important to apply ourselves diligently to all the doctrines of Scripture. I hope our time together will be a blessing to you. The topic of that we will consider in these sessions is the doctrine of salvation or soteriology. We want to examine what the Bible teaches about God's way of salvation. We want to understand different beliefs in this area of theology and be able to evaluate them through the lens of the Bible. In order to do this, I have been asked to do at least four workshops in which I speak on the various labels and positions, the Biblical tensions regarding the intention of the atonement, how to handle differences among ourselves, and how to emphasize evangelism in our churches and personal lives. I hope that these topics will best meet the current needs of you as pastors and of the church association. We have been praying to that end. To put this into context for the missionaries, you may remember that almost 3 years ago in Paysandu I taught one workshop on the definition of Reformed Theology. There we said that reformed theology consists of historic orthodoxy, reformation doctrines, the fundamentals of the faith, covenant theology, and Calvinism. It is on this last issue—Calvinism—and its main alternative system—Arminianism, that we will spend a lot of time thinking about in the first couple of workshops. Conferencia Pastoral de la UCB | 17 - 20 de Octubre 2016 | Pastor Matt Postiff, Ph.D., Th.M. 1 The issues we will speak about are very sensitive because they touch on the very core of the atonement. I also want to say that I did not come to the conference to make trouble or stir up hard feelings about theology. I came to be a help and blessing, and have prayed that God will use these sessions to be a help to us. My position is 4-point Calvinist, and I strongly believe in the need and practice of evangelism. But I am not here primarily to convince you to believe my position. I do not preach Calvinism or Arminianism in my church. I don't often use these labels. I don't spend tons of time preaching on election or inability. I preach the Bible verse by verse, paragraph by paragraph, through entire books of the Bible. I am first and foremost a Bible man. Our church is a Bible church. We believe in the sole authority and sufficiency of the Bible. Systems of theology are necessary and natural because we as humans are organizers and systematizers. But they must not become our source of authority. Scripture is that. Furthermore, our people are not fed properly unless they receive a steady diet of Bible. It is Bible for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Bible for meat and potatoes. Bible for dessert, and bedtime snack too! Therefore, I hope to help you evaluate your own theology of salvation by the Bible and be sure you are following Scripture; but also that when you run into someone who holds some different views, you know the best way to manage that. I hope that after we are done, we will be better equipped to maintain the truth that has been delivered to us, and to keep the unity of the Spirit that Jesus desires us to have. We will have accomplished our goal if we are more Biblically informed and can handle differences in our fellowship with Christ-like love and humility. In this first session, our goal will be to better understand the major positions concerning the doctrine of salvation so that we will not misuse the various labels. UCB Doctrine of Salvation We begin with what we believe and share in common. The following is copied from the Reglamentos Internos Iglesia Evangelical Unión de Centros Biblicos Chile (Versión 3, Julio 2015).1 5.- El Hombre Creemos que el ser humano fue creado a imagen de Dios por un acto directo y sobrenatural de El. Por el pecado del primer hombre, Adán, la humanidad incurrió en el castigo de la muerte física y espiritual, quedando de esta manera separada de Dios. En consecuencia, todos los seres humanos nacen con una naturaleza pecaminosa y son responsables de sus pensamientos, palabras y actos. El hombre necesita la salvación y no puede obtenerla por propios recursos, capacidades o actos de cualquier tipo. Gen. 1:27; Ro. 3:23; 5:12; 6:23; Gá. 5:l7ss; Ef. 2:1ss.; Ro. 3:23 6.- La Obra de Cristo Creemos que la muerte de Cristo en a cruz fue un sacrificio vicario y expiatorio. Con base en el 1 This is the latest edition that I have in my posssession. I would welcome someone to send me the latest version, if there is one. I do not have similar statements for UCB in Argentina or UCB in Uruguay. Conferencia Pastoral de la UCB | 17 - 20 de Octubre 2016 | Pastor Matt Postiff, Ph.D., Th.M. 2 derramamiento de Su sangre, Su resurrección corporal y su ascensión a la diestra del Padre, El provee salvación completa para todos y es el Salvador de todos que creen. Él está ahora en el cielo como intercesor y abogado a favor de los creyentes. 1ª Tim.2:6; 1ª Ped. 3:16; 1ª Co. 15:1ss; 1ª Jn. 2:1; He. 7:25. 7.- Justificación y Nuevo Nacimiento Creemos que cada persona que recibe a Jesucristo como su único Salvador y Señor por medio de la fe solamente, aparte de cualquier obra humana, es declarada justa ante Dios en virtud de justicia y la obra salvadora de Cristo. Es nacido de lo alto y llega a ser un hijo de Dios creado en Cristo Jesús para buenas obras sirviendo al Señor. Todos los redimidos son guardados eternamente por el poder de Dios. Jn. 1:12- 13; Ro. 3:21ss; 8:1, 29ss; 2ª Co. 5:17; Ef. 2:8-10; 1ª Jn. 5:11-12; Jn. 10:28-29. 8.- Santificación Creemos que cada persona que está en Cristo ya es santificada, o sea, apartada para Dios, en cuanto a su posición ante Él. Dios ha hecho provisión mediante la obra de Cristo y el ministerio del Espíritu Santo para que el creyente pueda vencer el pecado y crecer en santidad, vivir una vida llena del Espíritu y consagrada a Dios. La santificación del creyente no será completa en su vida terrenal hasta el día de la redención final en los cielos. 1ª. Cor.1:2; Rom. 6:6, 11-13; Gál. 5:16; Ef. 1:7; 4:30; 5:17ss; 2ª. Ped. 3:18; 1ª Tes. 5:23; 1ª Jn. 3:2. As best I can understand this statement of belief, it agrees very well with the views still held by the missionaries of Gospel Mission of South America (MESA). I am in agreement with it, as far as it goes. The Major Theological Positions on Salvation Pelagianism This heretical doctrine teaches that man’s nature is basically good, and “that original sin did not taint human nature and that the mortal will is capable of choosing good or evil without special divine aid.”2 Man has a free will and his nature is basically good. Each man is born today like Adam was created in the past, pure and upright. Most non Christians embrace this kind of view of mankind. We hear it from the highest levels of society and from the man on the street. Origin: Pelagius Morgan, British teacher in Rome, 5th century AD.3 Short statement: Man is good. Rebuttal: Biblical texts like Psalm 51:5, Romans 3:9-12, Romans 5:12-19, Ephesians 2:1-3. Diagram of Romans 3:9b-12 This text shows that the Pelagian assertion that original sin did not damage or stain human nature is false. Here is the text in Greek: 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelagianism 3 https://carm.org/pelagianism Conferencia Pastoral de la UCB | 17 - 20 de Octubre 2016 | Pastor Matt Postiff, Ph.D., Th.M. 3 9b προῃτιασάμεθα γὰρ Ἰουδαίους τε καὶ Ἕλληνας πάντας ὑφ᾽ ἁμαρτίαν εἶναι, 10 καθὼς γέγραπται ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν δίκαιος οὐδὲ εἷς, 11 οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ συνίων, οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ ἐκζητῶν τὸν θεόν. 12 πάντες ἐξέκλιναν ἅμα ἠχρεώθησαν· οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ ποιῶν χρηστότητα, [οὐκ ἔστιν] ἕως ἑνός. Paul writes so that we are certain that all humanity: every person who has ever lived, ever will live, or is now living, is described by the passage.
Recommended publications
  • Rev. Falwell, Rev. Sun Myung Moon And

    Rev. Falwell, Rev. Sun Myung Moon And

    Rev. Falwell, Rev. Sun Myung Moon and The Love of Money In this teaching we will be looking at the ‘fruit' of some of the most prominent ‘Christian' figures in America. This list will include: The late Rev. Jerry Falwell, Timothy La Haye 'Left Behind', Gary Bauer, Bill Bright, Paul Crouch, Dr. James Dobson, Rev. Billy Graham, Dr. D. James Kennedy, Beverly La Haye, Ralph Reed, Pat Robertson, Rev. James Robison, Phyllis Schlafly, George Bush Sr. and Jr., Dr. Robert Schuller I and II Jerry Falwell. Jesus said by their fruits “ye shall know them”, which is in reference to the fruit of a true Christian as opposed to a pseudo Christian tare. We will be looking at the undeniable documented financial links of the people listed above cult leader Rev. Sun Myung Moon of the Unification Church of Korea. Unbelievably Rev. Moon was actually crowned Messiah and Savior of Earth on March 23, 2004 at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington D.C, where scores of Christian leaders as well as several U.S. Senators and Representatives met for this very blasphemous occasion. Southern Baptist leaders were on hand, as were Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) President Paul Crouch, Reverend Jerry Falwell, Rev. Robert Schuller, Kenneth Copeland, Pat Boone and many others. Moon claims Jesus failed on his mission to earth but Moon has not. This is one of the largest smoking guns and flagrant moves ever made and condoned by main stream Christian figures and politicians. This information is based on highly referenced, factual evidence. To hear go to: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=52007215646 Reverend Moon was crowned Messiah and Savior of Earth in Washington, D.C.
  • Events of the Reformation Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution

    Events of the Reformation Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution

    May 20, 2018 Events of the Reformation Protestants and Roman Catholics agree on first 5 centuries. What changed? Why did some in the Church want reform by the 16th century? Outline Why the Reformation? 1. Church becomes powerful institution. 2. Additional teaching and practices were added. 3. People begin questioning the Church. 4. Martin Luther’s protest. Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution Evidence of Rome’s power grab • In 2nd century we see bishops over regions; people looked to them for guidance. • Around 195AD there was dispute over which day to celebrate Passover (14th Nissan vs. Sunday) • Polycarp said 14th Nissan, but now Victor (Bishop of Rome) liked Sunday. • A council was convened to decide, and they decided on Sunday. • But bishops of Asia continued the Passover on 14th Nissan. • Eusebius wrote what happened next: “Thereupon Victor, who presided over the church at Rome, immediately attempted to cut off from the common unity the parishes of all Asia, with the churches that agreed with them, as heterodox [heretics]; and he wrote letters and declared all the brethren there wholly excommunicate.” (Eus., Hist. eccl. 5.24.9) Everyone started looking to Rome to settle disputes • Rome was always ending up on the winning side in their handling of controversial topics. 1 • So through a combination of the fact that Rome was the most important city in the ancient world and its bishop was always right doctrinally then everyone started looking to Rome. • So Rome took that power and developed it into the Roman Catholic Church by the 600s. Church granted power to rule • Constantine gave the pope power to rule over Italy, Jerusalem, Constantinople and Alexandria.
  • Calvinism Vs Wesleyan Arminianism

    Calvinism Vs Wesleyan Arminianism

    The Comparison of Calvinism and Wesleyan Arminianism by Carl L. Possehl Membership Class Resource B.S., Upper Iowa University, 1968 M.C.M., Olivet Nazarene University, 1991 Pastor, Plantation Wesleyan Church 10/95 Edition When we start to investigate the difference between Calvinism and Wesleyan Arminianism, the question must be asked: "For Whom Did Christ Die?" Many Christians answer the question with these Scriptures: (Failing, 1978, pp.1-3) JOH 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. (NIV) We believe that "whoever" means "any person, and ...that any person can believe, by the assisting Spirit of God." (Failing, 1978, pp.1-3) 1Timothy 2:3-4 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, (4) who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. (NIV) 2PE 3:9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. (NIV) REV 22:17 The Spirit and the bride say, "Come!" And let him who hears say, "Come!" Whoever is thirsty, let him come; and whoever wishes, let him take the free gift of the water of life. (NIV) (Matthew 28:19-20 NIV) Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, (20) and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
  • Studying the Bible

    Studying the Bible

    STUDYING THE BIBLE Prepared by the Reverend Brent Anderson WHAT IS THE BIBLE? The word “Bible” is derived from a plural Greek word, into covenant relation with the God of justice and ta biblia, “the little scrolls” or “the books”. While steadfast love and to bring God’s way and blessings to many think of the Bible as a single book, it is actually a the nations. The New Testament is considerably short- collection of books—a collection of many diverse er than the Old Testament. It consists of twenty-seven writings from our ancestors in the faith who tell the books written entirely in Greek. It records the life, story of God and God’s love. Like an ancestral scrap- work and significance of Jesus Christ (including the book, the Bible is the witness of God’s people of God’s practical and ethical implications of following him) and commitment to Israel—and through Israel to the it describes the spread of the early Christian church as world—and God’s decisive activity on behalf of the well as a vision of God’s ultimate desires for God’s world through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus people and creation. Christ. It is a book that gathers the testimonies and THE PURPOSE OF BIBLE STUDY confessions of the ancient Israelites and early Chris- Our goal in studying the Bible is not primarily to learn tians regarding the nature and will of God—revealing information—to learn the history or story of God’s who God is and what God is like.
  • Every Book in the Bible, Either Directly Or Indirectly, Tells You ___It Was

    Every Book in the Bible, Either Directly Or Indirectly, Tells You ___It Was

    Every book in the Bible, either directly or indirectly, tells you _________ it was written. Today’s text in Galatians does just that as we will see the very reason for the letter. It is important to note that within the ranks of Christianity these four verses are softened up in ______________ Bibles by mistranslations and rewording, or by simply avoiding these scriptures completely. It seems better in this lukewarm age to side- step this hard issue and let it go unchecked rather than hitting it head on and allowing its truth to convict hearts and transform lives. This morning as we are working through the passage remember your ____________ friends and family who may have been given a false hope in religion, and as a result, will face the consequences in the future. For certain, as the Bible states, there will come a time to answer for their rejection of the gospel and to face ____________________ from the Lord Jesus Christ himself. THE PEOPLE’S PROBLEM – GALATIANS 1:6-9 1. False gospel – Galatians 1:6-7a a. The exasperation – verse 6 - The churches’ desertion of God – verse 6a - The churches’ desertion of the ______________ of Christ – verse 6b b. The determination – verse 7a - There is _______ other gospel The plain and simple _________________ – 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures… He was buried… He rose again the third day according to the scriptures The response we must have when hearing the gospel – Romans 10:9-10, 13 Confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus…with the mouth confession is made unto salvation Believe in in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead…for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness Call upon the name of the Lord to be _______________ (talk to God in prayer and receive Christ as your personal sin-bearer, asking God to save you) Any other message is false and a clear departure from the plain and simple truth.
  • Hunter Bailey Phd Thesis 08.Pdf (1.357Mb)

    Hunter Bailey Phd Thesis 08.Pdf (1.357Mb)

    VIA MEDIA ALIA: RECONSIDERING THE CONTROVERSIAL DOCTRINE OF UNIVERSAL REDEMPTION IN THE THEOLOGY OF JAMES FRASER OF BREA (1639-1699) A thesis submitted to New College, the School of Divinity of the University of Edinburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2008 By Hunter M. Bailey M.Th. (2003) University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK M.Div. (2002) Reformed Theological Seminary, Jackson, MS, USA B.A. (1998) University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA I hereby declare that this thesis has been composed by myself and is the result of my own independent research. It has not, in any form, been submitted or accepted for any other degree or professional qualification, as specified in the regulations of the University of Edinburgh. All quotations in this thesis have been distinguished by quotation marks, and all sources of outside information have received proper acknowledgment. _________________________________ Hunter M. Bailey 16 June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents....................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements.................................................................................................... v Abstract..................................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations............................................................................................................ ix Section A Chapter 1: An Introduction..........................................................................
  • Two Aspects in the Design of Christ's Atonement

    Two Aspects in the Design of Christ's Atonement

    Journal for Baptist Theology and Ministry Vol. 2 No. 2 (Fall 2004): 85-98 Two Aspects in the Design of Christ’s Atonement Wayne S. Hansen Associate Professor of Theology Bethel Seminary of the East 1601 N. Limekiln Pike Dresher, Pennsylvania 19025 For well over three and a half centuries Christians have been divided over one aspect of Christ’s atonement. This topic has served to separate believer from believer, often with great animosity. The cleavage is so great that it has divided schools, denominational institutions, mission agencies, and local churches. Ironically, it has been labeled as a “non-essential” by at least one side in the debate. Yet the implications for this topic are significant for one’s approach to the church, evangelism, confidence in the sovereignty of God, and especially, Christology. The topic I am alluding to is limited atonement, to use its more recognized label. Some have preferred the term “definite atonement” or “particular redemption” to emphasize the positive focus of the doctrine and eliminate any suspicion of the value of Christ’s work. But whichever term is used the basic question remains. “Did God intend to save only the elect in the death of Christ or provide salvation for all?” Passionate defenses on each side of the issue have been offered. Frequently, tensions are so strong on this issue that one side does not hear what the other is saying. Each feels justified in her/his view and often refuses to look at the other’s argument. Not a few have stated that both are true and then dismissed the subject without seeing the inconsistency of their logic.
  • The Catholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation Is Perhaps the Most Well Received Teaching When It Comes to the Application of Greek Philosophy

    The Catholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation Is Perhaps the Most Well Received Teaching When It Comes to the Application of Greek Philosophy

    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2010 The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense Pat Selwood Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Selwood, Pat, "The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense" (2010). Honors Theses. 11. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/11 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My deepest appreciation and gratitude goes out to those people who have given their support to the completion of this thesis and my undergraduate degree on the whole. To my close friends, Carolyn, Joseph and Andrew, for their great friendship and encouragement. To my advisor Professor Paul Macdonald, for his direction, and the unyielding passion and spirit that he brings to teaching. To the Heights, for the guidance and inspiration they have brought to my faith: Crescite . And lastly, to my parents, whose love, support, and sacrifice have given me every opportunity to follow my dreams. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………..………………………………………………1 Preface: Explanation of Terms………………...………………………………………......5 Chapter One: Historical Analysis of the Doctrine…………………………………...……9
  • Calvinism and Arminianism Are Tw

    Calvinism and Arminianism Are Tw

    K-Group week 3 Question: "Calvinism vs. Arminianism - which view is correct?" Answer: Calvinism and Arminianism are two systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God's sovereignty and man's responsibility in the matter of salvation. Calvinism is named for John Calvin, a French theologian who lived from 1509-1564. Arminianism is named for Jacobus Arminius, a Dutch theologian who lived from 1560-1609. Both systems can be summarized with five points. Calvinism holds to the total depravity of man while Arminianism holds to partial depravity. Calvinism’s doctrine of total depravity states that every aspect of humanity is corrupted by sin; therefore, human beings are unable to come to God on their own accord. Partial depravity states that every aspect of humanity is tainted by sin, but not to the extent that human beings are unable to place faith in God of their own accord. Note: classical Arminianism rejects “partial depravity” and holds a view very close to Calvinistic “total depravity” (although the extent and meaning of that depravity are debated in Arminian circles). In general, Arminians believe there is an “intermediate” state between total depravity and salvation. In this state, made possible by prevenient grace, the sinner is being drawn to Christ and has the God-given ability to choose salvation. Calvinism includes the belief that election is unconditional, while Arminianism believes in conditional election. Unconditional election is the view that God elects individuals to salvation based entirely on His will, not on anything inherently worthy in the individual. Conditional election states that God elects individuals to salvation based on His foreknowledge of who will believe in Christ unto salvation, thereby on the condition that the individual chooses God.
  • Introduction to Various Theological Systems Within the Christian Tradition

    Introduction to Various Theological Systems Within the Christian Tradition

    Introduction to Theological Systems: Dr. Paul R. Shockley Theological Systems Dogmatic Theology: A doctrine or body of doctrines of theology and religion formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a group. Calvinist Theology John Calvin (1509-1564) French Institutes – 80 chapter document explaining his views Presbyterian churches Jonathan Edwards, George Whitfield, Charles Spurgeon, Charles Hodge, William Shedd, Benjamin Warfield, Cornelius Van Til Westminster Confession - 1647 Emphases of Calvinism Sovereignty Predestination TULIP – Synod of Dort (1619) Total Depravity Unconditional Election Limited Atonement Irresistible Grace Perseverance of the Saints Arminian Theology Jacob Arminius (1560-1609) Dutch Remonstrance – 1610 document by followers of Arminius explaining his doctrine Methodist, Wesleyan, Episcopalian, Anglican, Free Will Baptist churches John Wesley, H. Orton Wiley Emphases of Arminianism God limits His sovereignty in accordance with man’s freedom – all divine decrees are based on foreknowledge Prevenient Grace – Prevenient grace has removed the guilt and condemnation of Adam’s sin – it reverses the curse Emphases of Arminianism Man is a sinner but not totally depravity (Free Will) Conditional Election based on the foreknowledge of God (God does not predestine all things) Unlimited Atonement Resistible Grace Salvation Insecure Covenant Theology Johann Bullinger (1504-1575) Swiss He was the sole author of Second Helvetic Confession of 1566, which gives a clear statement of the Reformed doctrine. Reformed churches Johannes Wollebius, William Ames, Johannes Cocceius, Hermann Witsius Westminster Confession – 1647 Emphases of Covenantism A system of interpreting the Scriptures on the basis of two covenants: the covenant of works and the covenant of grace. Some add the covenant of redemption. Importance of grace – In every age, believers are always saved by grace.
  • The Apostolicity of the Church

    The Apostolicity of the Church

    THE APOSTOLICITY OF THE CHURCH Study Document of the Lutheran–Roman Catholic Commission on Unity The Lutheran World Federation Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity Lutheran University Press Minneapolis, Minnesota The Apostolicity of the Church Study Document of the Lutheran–Roman Catholic Commission on Unity Copyright 2006 Lutheran University Press, The Lutheran World Federation, and The Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in articles or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior permission. Published by Lutheran University Press under the auspices of: The Lutheran World Federation 150, rte de Ferney, PO Box 2100 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland The Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity 00120 Vatican City, Vatican Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data Lutheran-Roman Catholic Commission on Unity The apostolicity of the church : study document of the Lutheran-Roman Catho- lic Commission on Unity [of] The Lutheran World Federation [and] Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-1-932688-22-1 ISBN-10: 1-932688-22-6 (perfect bound : alk. Paper) 1. Church—Apostolicity—History of doctrines—20th century. 2. Interdenomi- national cooperation. 3. Lutheran Church—Relations—Catholic Church. 4. Catho- lic Church—Relations—Lutheran Church. 5. Lutheran-Roman Catholic Com- mission on Unity. I. Title. BV601.2.L88 2006 262’.72—dc22 2006048678 Lutheran University Press, PO Box 390759, Minneapolis, MN 55439 Manufactured in the United States of America 2 CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................... 7 Part 1 The Apostolicity of the Church – New Testament Foundations 1.1 Introduction.
  • The Historical Denial of the Free Offer

    The Historical Denial of the Free Offer

    The Historical Denial of the Free Offer Modern Calvinist leaders who teach the free offer usually claim that they have support from historic Reformed theology. This is false. They frequently claim that Calvin supports their position and that the chief Reformed standards justify their claims. All this is false also. Historic Calvinism, both in its accepted standards and as expressed by its main theologians, denies the free offer; indeed, it would recognise the teaching of modern free offer preachers as Amyraldism, and condemn it as error. Now such is the lack of knowledge on these matters amongst today’s churchgoers that my claims here must be evidenced. I am happy to comply with this to demonstrate the truth. This paper is written to show what the foremost Reformed standards and theologians teach regarding the free offer. What is the free offer? The free offer is the teaching that: 1. God has a good intent to reprobates. 2. God loves all men without exception. 3. God desires, and even wills, the salvation of all men. 4. God gives grace to all men to some degree. To this the following is at least implied: 1. The atonement of Christ is universal in scope; he died for all. 2. Conversion is conditioned upon the will of the sinner. The Arminian basis of this theology is plain to see. Where does this come from? This teaching was once restricted to those who followed the school of Moses Amyraut (or Amyrald, 1596-1664) who sought to unite the universalism of Lutherans with the sovereign particularity of Calvinists.